| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Timothy" |
| Date: |
14 Dec 2005 09:47:18 AM |
| Object: |
Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
The Democrat Party is evidently about to collapse. The last two
elections would have been difficult anyway, since the Democrats had to
find someone to run against one of the towering figures of human
history. Even in 2000, he was formidable figure. In 2004, after he
accomplished his mission in Iraq, he is recognized by all those who
have not been blinded by the liberal media as the greatest President of
all time, with the exception of Reagan.
In some ways his accomplishments are more remarkable than Reagan's,
even though this verges on a sacrilegious statement. Reagan didn't
have to fight the most dangerous villain in human history (Saddam.)
He didn't have to fight the most powerful military juggernaut ever
assembled (Saddam's Democrat Guard, whose name was mistranslated by the
ultraliberal media as "The Republicsan Guard.") The fall of
Communism was a great event, but Bush II totally defeated an infinitely
more powerful and more dangerous political movement: islamofascism.
Reagan also never had to deal with a natural disaster like Hurricane
Katrina: Bush II has done a truly masterful job rebuilding the Gulf
Coast, showing just how strong America truly is economically.
The Democrats, on the other hand, nominated two of the greatest
villains in American history to run against Bush II: Al Gore and John
Kerry. And even if you look beyond their ethical shortcomings, Kerry
and Gore both hold views which are utterly outside the mainstream of
American society. A party which can nominate folks like that is one
which will collapse, no matter how much money it is still able to
raise.
It will be interesting to see what would happen to the Republicans
after the Democrats' seemingly inevitable demise. Presumably, the
displaced liberal voters will try to ally themselves with John McCain's
radiclib wing of the GOP. They may try to form a new party. McCain,
even though he campaigned for Bush II in 2004, cannot be trusted, and
he might very well put his personal ambitions ahead of his loyalty to
the Bush dynasty. (We saw him recently trying to undermine Bush II's
credi bility by pandering to the trendy anti-torture movement.) Even
with McCain at the helm, founding a new party will be difficult since
the American people would inevitably transfer their disgust and
revulsion against the old Democrat party to any new anti-Bush party.
YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE!
FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS!
.
|
|
| User: "needledik doesnt have a canadian clue" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
15 Dec 2005 02:18:50 AM |
|
|
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote in message
news:1134575238.781805.36960@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
The Democrat Party is evidently about to collapse.
Not any time soon, needledik.
Bad news for you, needledik. Jon Corzine trounces kkkrookkked lying
repugnigoon Forrester Gump and Tim Kaine trounces Jerry (Falwell) Kilgore in
RED state.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1294540
Democrats Win Elections in NJ, VA, CA
Nov 9, 2005 - Democrats cleaned up big in off-year elections from New Jersey
to California, sinking the candidate who embraced President Bush in the
final days of the Virginia governor's campaign. They also turned back GOP
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's efforts to limit the power of California's
Democratic leaders.
Democratic Sen. Jon Corzine easily won the New Jersey governor's seat after
an expensive, mudslinging campaign, trouncing Republican Doug Forrester by
10 percentage points. Polls in the last week had forecast a much closer
race.
Democratic Lt. Gov. Tim Kaine won a solid victory in GOP-leaning Virginia,
beating Republican Jerry Kilgore by more than 5 percentage points. Democrats
crowed that Bush's election-eve rally for the former state attorney general
only spurred more Kaine supporters to the polls.
In California, Schwarzenegger failed in his push to rein in the
Democrat-controlled Assembly with ballot measures that would cap spending
and remove legislators' redistricting powers. Another measure he supported
was trailing and a fourth was too close to call.
Elsewhere, Texas voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional ban on gay
marriage, Maine voted to preserve the state's new gay-rights law, and GOP
Mayor Michael Bloomberg easily clinched a second term in heavily Democratic
New York.
Democrats said the results were the first steps toward bigger victories next
year when control of Congress and 36 governors seats are at stake and for
the 2008 presidential race.
"I believe national Republican politics . really had an effect in Virginia
and California," said Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean. Voters "don't
like the abuse of power, they don't like the culture of corruption. They
want the nation to go in a different way."
Republicans warned against reading too much into two governorships that
started the day in Democratic hands and ended that way. Virginia Gov. Mark
Warner was barred by law from seeking a second term, and New Jersey acting
Gov. Richard J. Codey opted not to run.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bush Patriot" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
14 Dec 2005 05:37:59 PM |
|
|
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote in message
news:1134575238.781805.36960@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
The Democrat Party is evidently about to collapse. The last two
elections would have been difficult anyway, since the Democrats had to
find someone to run against one of the towering figures of human
history. Even in 2000, he was formidable figure. In 2004, after he
accomplished his mission in Iraq, he is recognized by all those who
have not been blinded by the liberal media as the greatest President of
all time, with the exception of Reagan.
In some ways his accomplishments are more remarkable than Reagan's,
even though this verges on a sacrilegious statement. Reagan didn't
have to fight the most dangerous villain in human history (Saddam.)
He didn't have to fight the most powerful military juggernaut ever
assembled (Saddam's Democrat Guard, whose name was mistranslated by the
ultraliberal media as "The Republicsan Guard.") The fall of
Communism was a great event, but Bush II totally defeated an infinitely
more powerful and more dangerous political movement: islamofascism.
Reagan also never had to deal with a natural disaster like Hurricane
Katrina: Bush II has done a truly masterful job rebuilding the Gulf
Coast, showing just how strong America truly is economically.
The Democrats, on the other hand, nominated two of the greatest
villains in American history to run against Bush II: Al Gore and John
Kerry. And even if you look beyond their ethical shortcomings, Kerry
and Gore both hold views which are utterly outside the mainstream of
American society. A party which can nominate folks like that is one
which will collapse, no matter how much money it is still able to
raise.
It will be interesting to see what would happen to the Republicans
after the Democrats' seemingly inevitable demise. Presumably, the
displaced liberal voters will try to ally themselves with John McCain's
radiclib wing of the GOP. They may try to form a new party. McCain,
even though he campaigned for Bush II in 2004, cannot be trusted, and
he might very well put his personal ambitions ahead of his loyalty to
the Bush dynasty. (We saw him recently trying to undermine Bush II's
credi bility by pandering to the trendy anti-torture movement.) Even
with McCain at the helm, founding a new party will be difficult since
the American people would inevitably transfer their disgust and
revulsion against the old Democrat party to any new anti-Bush party.
YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE!
FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS!
Finally! It's about time some-one made some sence around hear. Some-day
Amarica will
apressiate what avishionarry Bush was!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "XTS" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
14 Dec 2005 08:15:51 PM |
|
|
Tim goes out, scores the good *****, comes home, smokes it and writes this:
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote in message
news:1134575238.781805.36960@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
The Democrat Party is evidently about to collapse. The last two
elections would have been difficult anyway, since the Democrats had to
find someone to run against one of the towering figures of human
history. Even in 2000, he was formidable figure. In 2004, after he
accomplished his mission in Iraq, he is recognized by all those who
have not been blinded by the liberal media as the greatest President of
all time, with the exception of Reagan.
In some ways his accomplishments are more remarkable than Reagan's,
even though this verges on a sacrilegious statement. Reagan didn't
have to fight the most dangerous villain in human history (Saddam.)
He didn't have to fight the most powerful military juggernaut ever
assembled (Saddam's Democrat Guard, whose name was mistranslated by the
ultraliberal media as "The Republicsan Guard.") The fall of
Communism was a great event, but Bush II totally defeated an infinitely
more powerful and more dangerous political movement: islamofascism.
Reagan also never had to deal with a natural disaster like Hurricane
Katrina: Bush II has done a truly masterful job rebuilding the Gulf
Coast, showing just how strong America truly is economically.
The Democrats, on the other hand, nominated two of the greatest
villains in American history to run against Bush II: Al Gore and John
Kerry. And even if you look beyond their ethical shortcomings, Kerry
and Gore both hold views which are utterly outside the mainstream of
American society. A party which can nominate folks like that is one
which will collapse, no matter how much money it is still able to
raise.
It will be interesting to see what would happen to the Republicans
after the Democrats' seemingly inevitable demise. Presumably, the
displaced liberal voters will try to ally themselves with John McCain's
radiclib wing of the GOP. They may try to form a new party. McCain,
even though he campaigned for Bush II in 2004, cannot be trusted, and
he might very well put his personal ambitions ahead of his loyalty to
the Bush dynasty. (We saw him recently trying to undermine Bush II's
credi bility by pandering to the trendy anti-torture movement.) Even
with McCain at the helm, founding a new party will be difficult since
the American people would inevitably transfer their disgust and
revulsion against the old Democrat party to any new anti-Bush party.
YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE!
FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS!
Pass that ***** Tim.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lamont Cranston" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
14 Dec 2005 09:56:13 AM |
|
|
Timothy wrote:
The Democrat Party is evidently about to collapse. The last two
elections would have been difficult anyway, since the Democrats had to
find someone to run against one of the towering figures of human
history. Even in 2000, he was formidable figure. In 2004, after he
accomplished his mission in Iraq, he is recognized by all those who
have not been blinded by the liberal media as the greatest President of
all time, with the exception of Reagan.
Mission accomplished. ROTFLMA!!!! You are truly delusional.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
14 Dec 2005 10:21:46 AM |
|
|
Dems about to collapse, are you crazy. The President is very unpopular
as is the GOP leadership. The economy remains unimpressive 5 years
after the start of the last recession, health care costs continue to
exploid without Bush seeming to even notice, 4 speeches later the
policy in Iraq is to stay as long as the Iraqi government decides it
doesn't want to spend the money and blood to protect itself and to
never put any pressure on the Iraqi government to fight the war for
itself, the economic policy is to cherry pick what ever good news comes
along and claim it is all because of tax cuts in 2001.
Yah I know that my decision on how much to spend, save, and work in
2005 and 2006 are fully determined by changes to the tax code in 2002.
Also my behaviour in 2002, 2003, and 2004 was less influenced by tax
code changes than in 2005. As for 2006 that depends, if the economy is
weak the tax cut will not be working, if on the other hand millions of
hard working Americans continue to work hard and make economic gains
despite the war, despite the weak dollar, massive deficits, run away
government spending, and endless war it will all be the credit of Bush.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
17 Dec 2005 04:31:43 PM |
|
|
Lamont Cranston <Lamont@TheShadow.com> wrote:
Timothy wrote:
The Democrat Party is evidently about to collapse. The last two
elections would have been difficult anyway, since the Democrats had to
find someone to run against one of the towering figures of human
history.
Translation: Run against a mass murdering Christian butcher the
equal to Molosovich.
Mission accomplished. ROTFLMA!!!! You are truly delusional.
---
http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ http://www.rightard.org/ http://www.thedarkwind.org/
"SUVs don't burn down by themselves." -- Some elf in a bunny suit
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chuck Feney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
14 Dec 2005 01:38:20 PM |
|
|
Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
a clever satirical piece.
You really had me going for a while, Tim.
Nice work.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
14 Dec 2005 12:38:09 PM |
|
|
War is a way ignorant people can prove their ignorance.
IB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Theodore Baldwin Boothe III" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
14 Dec 2005 01:45:16 PM |
|
|
On 14 Dec 2005 10:38:09 -0800, "inkyblacks@yahoo.com"
<inkyblacks@yahoo.com> wrote:
War is a way ignorant people can prove their ignorance.
Which is why we had a civil war in the 1860's
Stupid wasn't it?
************************************
http://www.dubyareport.net/
New and Improved...No More Sillyness
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
14 Dec 2005 10:31:53 AM |
|
|
What's a "Democrat Party?" Do you mean the "Democratic Party?"
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote in message
news:1134575238.781805.36960@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
The Democrat Party is evidently about to collapse. The last two
elections would have been difficult anyway, since the Democrats had to
find someone to run against one of the towering figures of human
history. Even in 2000, he was formidable figure. In 2004, after he
accomplished his mission in Iraq, he is recognized by all those who
have not been blinded by the liberal media as the greatest President of
all time, with the exception of Reagan.
In some ways his accomplishments are more remarkable than Reagan's,
even though this verges on a sacrilegious statement. Reagan didn't
have to fight the most dangerous villain in human history (Saddam.)
He didn't have to fight the most powerful military juggernaut ever
assembled (Saddam's Democrat Guard, whose name was mistranslated by the
ultraliberal media as "The Republicsan Guard.") The fall of
Communism was a great event, but Bush II totally defeated an infinitely
more powerful and more dangerous political movement: islamofascism.
Reagan also never had to deal with a natural disaster like Hurricane
Katrina: Bush II has done a truly masterful job rebuilding the Gulf
Coast, showing just how strong America truly is economically.
The Democrats, on the other hand, nominated two of the greatest
villains in American history to run against Bush II: Al Gore and John
Kerry. And even if you look beyond their ethical shortcomings, Kerry
and Gore both hold views which are utterly outside the mainstream of
American society. A party which can nominate folks like that is one
which will collapse, no matter how much money it is still able to
raise.
It will be interesting to see what would happen to the Republicans
after the Democrats' seemingly inevitable demise. Presumably, the
displaced liberal voters will try to ally themselves with John McCain's
radiclib wing of the GOP. They may try to form a new party. McCain,
even though he campaigned for Bush II in 2004, cannot be trusted, and
he might very well put his personal ambitions ahead of his loyalty to
the Bush dynasty. (We saw him recently trying to undermine Bush II's
credi bility by pandering to the trendy anti-torture movement.) Even
with McCain at the helm, founding a new party will be difficult since
the American people would inevitably transfer their disgust and
revulsion against the old Democrat party to any new anti-Bush party.
YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE! YEW ESS AYE!
FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS! FOUR MORE WARS!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Eldred" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Democrat Party about to go out of existence? |
14 Dec 2005 12:33:53 PM |
|
|
<dan@dan.com> wrote in message
news:OoqdnYs8v7Rh1T3enZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
What's a "Democrat Party?" Do you mean the "Democratic Party?"
You've noticed that illiterate repugs don't know the difference between a
noun and an adjective. Oh well, stupid is as stupid does.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
