| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
31 Dec 2007 12:55:33 PM |
| Object: |
It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_further.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush’s State of the Union speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
…Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush’s New Year’s Resolution was not to promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became threatening an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would “be launched from the sea and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the region”
and involved no plan to “compromise or negotiate with Syria or Iran.”
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive “against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114.xml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
“detaining five men.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQMGSFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_personally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "The Countess" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
31 Dec 2007 01:31:41 PM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:uoein31dauviaonqmj7r4jqt247nefssj4@4ax.com...
The madness began on January 12th in Bush's State of the Union speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
the Madness began in January 2001 when he took office.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kirk out..." |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
31 Dec 2007 02:31:13 PM |
|
|
"The Countess" <countess@notyourmama.com> wrote in message
news:4779439e$0$28812$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:uoein31dauviaonqmj7r4jqt247nefssj4@4ax.com...
The madness began on January 12th in Bush's State of the Union speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
the Madness began in January 2001 when he took office.
The madness began when Babs pushed the retard out of her loins and dropped
him on his head behind the Satan Rally in 1947.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Zeno" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
31 Dec 2007 02:04:29 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_further.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush’s State of the Union speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
…Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush’s New Year’s Resolution was not to promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became threatening an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would “be launched from the sea and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the region”
and involved no plan to “compromise or negotiate with Syria or Iran.”
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive “against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114.xml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
“detaining five men.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQMGSFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_personally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five times a day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
.
|
|
|
| User: "Curly Surmudgeon" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
31 Dec 2007 02:10:26 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:29 -0600, Zeno wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_further.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush’s State of the Union speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
…Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush’s New Year’s Resolution was not to promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became threatening an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would “be launched from the sea and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the region”
and involved no plan to “compromise or negotiate with Syria or Iran.”
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive “against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114.xml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
“detaining five men.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQMGSFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_personally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five times a day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
Which proves that they're all crazymotherfuckers, moslem and christer
alike.
Aren't you sick of being caught in their crossfire?
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://feeds.feedburner.com/SL/thegreen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zeno" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
31 Dec 2007 03:59:43 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:10:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
<Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:29 -0600, Zeno wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_further.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush’s State of the Union speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
…Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush’s New Year’s Resolution was not to promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became threatening an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would “be launched from the sea and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the region”
and involved no plan to “compromise or negotiate with Syria or Iran.”
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive “against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114.xml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
“detaining five men.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQMGSFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_personally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five times a day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
Which proves that they're all crazymotherfuckers, moslem and christer
alike.
Aren't you sick of being caught in their crossfire?
To get a taste, perhaps you should read the Quran. It is kind of an
eye opener. All the different ways Infidels should be killed /
punished / fought / enslaved is amazing. It's sort of like a huge
bigoted grudge... Bigoted in the same way one Iraqi muslim sect kills
another Iraqi muslim sect.
Infidels should learn what they are up against...
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://feeds.feedburner.com/SL/thegreen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richardson-Obama in 08" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
02 Jan 2008 11:03:40 PM |
|
|
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:k7pin357rcilg2d8v5tkila0coc66a1pk5@4ax.com...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:10:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
<Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:29 -0600, Zeno wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_furt
her.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush's State of the Union speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
.Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush's New Year's Resolution was not to promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became threatening an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would "be launched from the sea and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the region"
and involved no plan to "compromise or negotiate with Syria or Iran."
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive "against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114.x
ml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
"detaining five men."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQMG
SFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_per
sonally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five times a day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
Which proves that they're all crazymotherfuckers, moslem and christer
alike.
Aren't you sick of being caught in their crossfire?
To get a taste, perhaps you should read the Quran. It is kind of an
eye opener. All the different ways Infidels should be killed /
punished / fought / enslaved is amazing. It's sort of like a huge
bigoted grudge... Bigoted in the same way one Iraqi muslim sect kills
another Iraqi muslim sect.
Infidels should learn what they are up against...
I've never read the Quran (nor do I have a desire to), so I can't dispute
your claim. I do know several peaceful, law-abiding Muslims who I assume
HAVE read the Quran, and they tell me it's a religion of peace. Since
they're peaceful, law-abiding citizens (one is the postmaster at my local
post office . . . a federal government employee . . . and is as nice a guy
as you could ever meet) I tend to take their word for it. Yes, there are
militant Muslims who have interpreted parts of the Quran to claim it
advocates death to all infidels, just as there are parts of the Christian
Bible that have been interpreted similarly by Christian zealots. You should
read some of the punishments the Bible calls for as punishment of some
really silly things, like wearing fabrics woven from two different types of
thread, or planting the wrong crop in the wrong field!
Fanatics of any creed are a blight on society. Getting rid of all religions
altogether would be utopia, but just getting rid of the fanatics within each
religion would be a good step in the right direction. Start with the ones
that show up on my doorstep periodically, trying to push their little
pamphlets off on me.
--
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zeno" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
03 Jan 2008 10:42:29 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:03:40 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:k7pin357rcilg2d8v5tkila0coc66a1pk5@4ax.com...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:10:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
<Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:29 -0600, Zeno wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_furt
her.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush's State of the Union speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
.Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush's New Year's Resolution was not to promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became threatening an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would "be launched from the sea and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the region"
and involved no plan to "compromise or negotiate with Syria or Iran."
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive "against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114.x
ml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
"detaining five men."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQMG
SFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_per
sonally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five times a day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
Which proves that they're all crazymotherfuckers, moslem and christer
alike.
Aren't you sick of being caught in their crossfire?
To get a taste, perhaps you should read the Quran. It is kind of an
eye opener. All the different ways Infidels should be killed /
punished / fought / enslaved is amazing. It's sort of like a huge
bigoted grudge... Bigoted in the same way one Iraqi muslim sect kills
another Iraqi muslim sect.
Infidels should learn what they are up against...
I've never read the Quran (nor do I have a desire to), so I can't dispute
your claim. I do know several peaceful, law-abiding Muslims who I assume
HAVE read the Quran, and they tell me it's a religion of peace. Since
they're peaceful, law-abiding citizens (one is the postmaster at my local
post office . . . a federal government employee . . . and is as nice a guy
as you could ever meet) I tend to take their word for it. Yes, there are
militant Muslims who have interpreted parts of the Quran to claim it
advocates death to all infidels, just as there are parts of the Christian
Bible that have been interpreted similarly by Christian zealots. You should
read some of the punishments the Bible calls for as punishment of some
really silly things, like wearing fabrics woven from two different types of
thread, or planting the wrong crop in the wrong field!
Fanatics of any creed are a blight on society. Getting rid of all religions
altogether would be utopia, but just getting rid of the fanatics within each
religion would be a good step in the right direction. Start with the ones
that show up on my doorstep periodically, trying to push their little
pamphlets off on me.
Do these people that show up at your door look or act like the person
that murdered Bhutto (who was pro west/america) ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richardson-Obama in 08" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
03 Jan 2008 09:08:13 PM |
|
|
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:us3qn3tvftkcrl2c2ruabhtgv0l2o7p9b0@4ax.com...
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:03:40 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:k7pin357rcilg2d8v5tkila0coc66a1pk5@4ax.com...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:10:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
<Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:29 -0600, Zeno wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope
<rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_fur
t
her.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush's State of the Union
speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous
year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
.Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial
integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use
their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush's New Year's Resolution was not to promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war
might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became threatening
an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would "be launched from the sea and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the
region"
and involved no plan to "compromise or negotiate with Syria or
Iran."
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive "against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114.
x
ml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
"detaining five men."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQM
G
SFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the
Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from
Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_pe
r
sonally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as
analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five times a
day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
Which proves that they're all crazymotherfuckers, moslem and christer
alike.
Aren't you sick of being caught in their crossfire?
To get a taste, perhaps you should read the Quran. It is kind of an
eye opener. All the different ways Infidels should be killed /
punished / fought / enslaved is amazing. It's sort of like a huge
bigoted grudge... Bigoted in the same way one Iraqi muslim sect kills
another Iraqi muslim sect.
Infidels should learn what they are up against...
I've never read the Quran (nor do I have a desire to), so I can't dispute
your claim. I do know several peaceful, law-abiding Muslims who I assume
HAVE read the Quran, and they tell me it's a religion of peace. Since
they're peaceful, law-abiding citizens (one is the postmaster at my local
post office . . . a federal government employee . . . and is as nice a
guy
as you could ever meet) I tend to take their word for it. Yes, there are
militant Muslims who have interpreted parts of the Quran to claim it
advocates death to all infidels, just as there are parts of the Christian
Bible that have been interpreted similarly by Christian zealots. You
should
read some of the punishments the Bible calls for as punishment of some
really silly things, like wearing fabrics woven from two different types
of
thread, or planting the wrong crop in the wrong field!
Fanatics of any creed are a blight on society. Getting rid of all
religions
altogether would be utopia, but just getting rid of the fanatics within
each
religion would be a good step in the right direction. Start with the
ones
that show up on my doorstep periodically, trying to push their little
pamphlets off on me.
Do these people that show up at your door look or act like the person
that murdered Bhutto (who was pro west/america) ?
I don't know. Did the person that murdered Bhutto wear a white shirt, black
tie and ride a bicycle? I doubt it. It's far more likely that the person
who murdered Bhutto had a Pakistani Army uniform in his closet.
--
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zeno" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
04 Jan 2008 12:10:42 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:08:13 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:us3qn3tvftkcrl2c2ruabhtgv0l2o7p9b0@4ax.com...
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:03:40 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:k7pin357rcilg2d8v5tkila0coc66a1pk5@4ax.com...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:10:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
<Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:29 -0600, Zeno wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope
<rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_fur
t
her.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush's State of the Union
speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous
year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
.Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial
integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use
their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush's New Year's Resolution was not to promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war
might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became threatening
an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would "be launched from the sea and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the
region"
and involved no plan to "compromise or negotiate with Syria or
Iran."
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive "against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114.
x
ml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
"detaining five men."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQM
G
SFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the
Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from
Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_pe
r
sonally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as
analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five times a
day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
Which proves that they're all crazymotherfuckers, moslem and christer
alike.
Aren't you sick of being caught in their crossfire?
To get a taste, perhaps you should read the Quran. It is kind of an
eye opener. All the different ways Infidels should be killed /
punished / fought / enslaved is amazing. It's sort of like a huge
bigoted grudge... Bigoted in the same way one Iraqi muslim sect kills
another Iraqi muslim sect.
Infidels should learn what they are up against...
I've never read the Quran (nor do I have a desire to), so I can't dispute
your claim. I do know several peaceful, law-abiding Muslims who I assume
HAVE read the Quran, and they tell me it's a religion of peace. Since
they're peaceful, law-abiding citizens (one is the postmaster at my local
post office . . . a federal government employee . . . and is as nice a
guy
as you could ever meet) I tend to take their word for it. Yes, there are
militant Muslims who have interpreted parts of the Quran to claim it
advocates death to all infidels, just as there are parts of the Christian
Bible that have been interpreted similarly by Christian zealots. You
should
read some of the punishments the Bible calls for as punishment of some
really silly things, like wearing fabrics woven from two different types
of
thread, or planting the wrong crop in the wrong field!
Fanatics of any creed are a blight on society. Getting rid of all
religions
altogether would be utopia, but just getting rid of the fanatics within
each
religion would be a good step in the right direction. Start with the
ones
that show up on my doorstep periodically, trying to push their little
pamphlets off on me.
Do these people that show up at your door look or act like the person
that murdered Bhutto (who was pro west/america) ?
I don't know.
Don't play stupid. You know quite well there is a difference.
Did the person that murdered Bhutto wear a white shirt, black
tie and ride a bicycle? I doubt it. It's far more likely that the person
who murdered Bhutto had a Pakistani Army uniform in his closet.
And the guy that blew himself up trying to kill her earlier - but
wasn't close enough. You are thinking he too had a Pakistani Army
uniform in his closet?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richardson-Obama in 08" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
04 Jan 2008 12:16:34 AM |
|
|
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:j6jrn395a9bjf938sa0svhobjdq6bs0e8f@4ax.com...
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:08:13 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:us3qn3tvftkcrl2c2ruabhtgv0l2o7p9b0@4ax.com...
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:03:40 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:k7pin357rcilg2d8v5tkila0coc66a1pk5@4ax.com...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:10:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
<Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:29 -0600, Zeno wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope
<rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_fu
r
t
her.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush's State of the Union
speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous
year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
.Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial
integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use
their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American
troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush's New Year's Resolution was not to
promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war
might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became
threatening
an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and
would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the
war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House
meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would "be launched from the sea
and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the
region"
and involved no plan to "compromise or negotiate with Syria or
Iran."
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive "against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114
..
x
ml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
"detaining five men."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQ
M
G
SFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the
Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was
that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from
Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_p
e
r
sonally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as
analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring
were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading
Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five times a
day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
Which proves that they're all crazymotherfuckers, moslem and
christer
alike.
Aren't you sick of being caught in their crossfire?
To get a taste, perhaps you should read the Quran. It is kind of an
eye opener. All the different ways Infidels should be killed /
punished / fought / enslaved is amazing. It's sort of like a huge
bigoted grudge... Bigoted in the same way one Iraqi muslim sect
kills
another Iraqi muslim sect.
Infidels should learn what they are up against...
I've never read the Quran (nor do I have a desire to), so I can't
dispute
your claim. I do know several peaceful, law-abiding Muslims who I
assume
HAVE read the Quran, and they tell me it's a religion of peace. Since
they're peaceful, law-abiding citizens (one is the postmaster at my
local
post office . . . a federal government employee . . . and is as nice a
guy
as you could ever meet) I tend to take their word for it. Yes, there
are
militant Muslims who have interpreted parts of the Quran to claim it
advocates death to all infidels, just as there are parts of the
Christian
Bible that have been interpreted similarly by Christian zealots. You
should
read some of the punishments the Bible calls for as punishment of some
really silly things, like wearing fabrics woven from two different
types
of
thread, or planting the wrong crop in the wrong field!
Fanatics of any creed are a blight on society. Getting rid of all
religions
altogether would be utopia, but just getting rid of the fanatics
within
each
religion would be a good step in the right direction. Start with the
ones
that show up on my doorstep periodically, trying to push their little
pamphlets off on me.
Do these people that show up at your door look or act like the person
that murdered Bhutto (who was pro west/america) ?
I don't know.
Don't play stupid. You know quite well there is a difference.
Of course there is. One group doesn't bother me if I don't bother them, and
the other group insists on beating on my door at least twice a week, and
yells at the neighborhood kids that they'll be damned to burn forever in
hell for not believing in their "loving god".
Did the person that murdered Bhutto wear a white shirt, black
tie and ride a bicycle? I doubt it. It's far more likely that the
person
who murdered Bhutto had a Pakistani Army uniform in his closet.
And the guy that blew himself up trying to kill her earlier - but
wasn't close enough. You are thinking he too had a Pakistani Army
uniform in his closet?
Quite possibly. What other explanation can you make for these radicals
being able to get past the security, that Musharraf was supposedly providing
for his political rival, so easily?
--
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zeno" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
04 Jan 2008 12:01:55 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:16:34 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:j6jrn395a9bjf938sa0svhobjdq6bs0e8f@4ax.com...
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:08:13 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:us3qn3tvftkcrl2c2ruabhtgv0l2o7p9b0@4ax.com...
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:03:40 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:k7pin357rcilg2d8v5tkila0coc66a1pk5@4ax.com...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:10:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
<Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:29 -0600, Zeno wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope
<rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_fu
r
t
her.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush's State of the Union
speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another tumultuous
year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
.Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial
integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use
their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American
troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush's New Year's Resolution was not to
promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the war
might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became
threatening
an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and
would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against the
war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House
meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would "be launched from the sea
and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the
region"
and involved no plan to "compromise or negotiate with Syria or
Iran."
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive "against Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq114
.
x
ml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
"detaining five men."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFIQ
M
G
SFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for the
Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which was
that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer from
Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_p
e
r
sonally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as
analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring
were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading
Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five times a
day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
Which proves that they're all crazymotherfuckers, moslem and
christer
alike.
Aren't you sick of being caught in their crossfire?
To get a taste, perhaps you should read the Quran. It is kind of an
eye opener. All the different ways Infidels should be killed /
punished / fought / enslaved is amazing. It's sort of like a huge
bigoted grudge... Bigoted in the same way one Iraqi muslim sect
kills
another Iraqi muslim sect.
Infidels should learn what they are up against...
I've never read the Quran (nor do I have a desire to), so I can't
dispute
your claim. I do know several peaceful, law-abiding Muslims who I
assume
HAVE read the Quran, and they tell me it's a religion of peace. Since
they're peaceful, law-abiding citizens (one is the postmaster at my
local
post office . . . a federal government employee . . . and is as nice a
guy
as you could ever meet) I tend to take their word for it. Yes, there
are
militant Muslims who have interpreted parts of the Quran to claim it
advocates death to all infidels, just as there are parts of the
Christian
Bible that have been interpreted similarly by Christian zealots. You
should
read some of the punishments the Bible calls for as punishment of some
really silly things, like wearing fabrics woven from two different
types
of
thread, or planting the wrong crop in the wrong field!
Fanatics of any creed are a blight on society. Getting rid of all
religions
altogether would be utopia, but just getting rid of the fanatics
within
each
religion would be a good step in the right direction. Start with the
ones
that show up on my doorstep periodically, trying to push their little
pamphlets off on me.
Do these people that show up at your door look or act like the person
that murdered Bhutto (who was pro west/america) ?
I don't know.
Don't play stupid. You know quite well there is a difference.
Of course there is. One group doesn't bother me if I don't bother them, and
the other group insists on beating on my door at least twice a week, and
yells at the neighborhood kids that they'll be damned to burn forever in
hell for not believing in their "loving god".
I see that you don't mind lying.
Did the person that murdered Bhutto wear a white shirt, black
tie and ride a bicycle? I doubt it. It's far more likely that the
person
who murdered Bhutto had a Pakistani Army uniform in his closet.
And the guy that blew himself up trying to kill her earlier - but
wasn't close enough. You are thinking he too had a Pakistani Army
uniform in his closet?
Quite possibly. What other explanation can you make for these radicals
being able to get past the security, that Musharraf was supposedly providing
for his political rival, so easily?
What other explanation?
Playing stupid again? Yes, there is another explanation.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richardson-Obama in 08" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
04 Jan 2008 03:51:31 PM |
|
|
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:4vssn392rs9f7stt7nevr8qg3jm1dpgvvq@4ax.com...
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:16:34 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:j6jrn395a9bjf938sa0svhobjdq6bs0e8f@4ax.com...
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:08:13 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:us3qn3tvftkcrl2c2ruabhtgv0l2o7p9b0@4ax.com...
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:03:40 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:k7pin357rcilg2d8v5tkila0coc66a1pk5@4ax.com...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:10:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
<Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:29 -0600, Zeno wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:55:33 -0500, Harry Hope
<rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kevin_go_071231_a_year_spent_f
u
r
t
her.htm
December 31, 2007
A Year Spent Further Defining Madness
by Kevin Gosztola
It was a good year for madness.
Madness found the chance to manifest itself in many forms.
Some would say too many, others would say not enough.
Those who would say not enough would probably not think of it
as
madness like we do.
The madness began on January 12th in Bush's State of the Union
speech
when he laid the groundwork for what would be another
tumultuous
year
for our troops in the Middle East:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16149.htm
.Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial
integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist
challenges.
This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to
use
their
territory to move in and out of Iraq.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American
troops.
We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
We'll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing
advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq...
Americans realized Bush's New Year's Resolution was not to
promote
peace on Earth.
The president in less than a minute sent a signal to the
American
people that Iraq would not be over anytime soon and that the
war
might
be expanding into other areas in the Middle East.
The method for stalling any end to the Iraq war became
threatening
an
illegal war on Iran.
By threatening war with Iran, it forced Democrats to question
the
accepted "truth" that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and
would
be an "imminent threat" if not responded to.
It divided the anti-war bloc in America because some against
the
war
in Iraq were not against taking on Iran.
Just days after the State of the Union speech, a White House
meeting
was held between Cheney, Gates, Rice, and other assistants on
attacking Iran.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16169.htm
It was decided that the attack would "be launched from the sea
and
Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the
region"
and involved no plan to "compromise or negotiate with Syria or
Iran."
A day later Bush signed a clandestine directive "against
Iranian
officials and Revolutionary Guards officers behind a support
and
funding network for anti-American fighters in Iraq."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/wirq11
4
.
x
ml
Under this directive, they raided an Iranian "liaison office"
"detaining five men."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GV50KFJDATR0HQFI
Q
M
G
SFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/12/wiraq12.xml
The madness continued despite the objections to the thought of
a
possible war with Iran.
Peter Pace, a marine general, continued to refuse to lie for
the
Bush
administration on Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17068.htm and
continued to say what he had been saying since March, which
was
that
Iran was not involved in Iraq.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16154.htm
It was found out that Karl Rove had rejected a peace offer
from
Iran.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/26/ex_congressional_aide_karl_rove_
p
e
r
sonally
The build up to a new war also began to seem all too familiar
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17002.htm as
analysts,
scholars, and average Americans realized the events occurring
were
exactly the same as the ones that had occurred before invading
Iraq.
___________________________________________________
Rightard madness was the 2007 Repug name of the game.
Harry
While on the other hand, chanting "Death to America" five
times a
day,
while praying, is nothing short of brainwashing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5240138297636645366
Which proves that they're all crazymotherfuckers, moslem and
christer
alike.
Aren't you sick of being caught in their crossfire?
To get a taste, perhaps you should read the Quran. It is kind of
an
eye opener. All the different ways Infidels should be killed /
punished / fought / enslaved is amazing. It's sort of like a
huge
bigoted grudge... Bigoted in the same way one Iraqi muslim sect
kills
another Iraqi muslim sect.
Infidels should learn what they are up against...
I've never read the Quran (nor do I have a desire to), so I can't
dispute
your claim. I do know several peaceful, law-abiding Muslims who I
assume
HAVE read the Quran, and they tell me it's a religion of peace.
Since
they're peaceful, law-abiding citizens (one is the postmaster at my
local
post office . . . a federal government employee . . . and is as
nice a
guy
as you could ever meet) I tend to take their word for it. Yes,
there
are
militant Muslims who have interpreted parts of the Quran to claim
it
advocates death to all infidels, just as there are parts of the
Christian
Bible that have been interpreted similarly by Christian zealots.
You
should
read some of the punishments the Bible calls for as punishment of
some
really silly things, like wearing fabrics woven from two different
types
of
thread, or planting the wrong crop in the wrong field!
Fanatics of any creed are a blight on society. Getting rid of all
religions
altogether would be utopia, but just getting rid of the fanatics
within
each
religion would be a good step in the right direction. Start with
the
ones
that show up on my doorstep periodically, trying to push their
little
pamphlets off on me.
Do these people that show up at your door look or act like the
person
that murdered Bhutto (who was pro west/america) ?
I don't know.
Don't play stupid. You know quite well there is a difference.
Of course there is. One group doesn't bother me if I don't bother them,
and
the other group insists on beating on my door at least twice a week, and
yells at the neighborhood kids that they'll be damned to burn forever in
hell for not believing in their "loving god".
I see that you don't mind lying.
What lie? Christianity has ALWAYS been promoted and propogated through
fear. The purpose of religion is to keep the common people in line.
Christianity does it by promising an eternity of bliss for those who follow
the rules the Church lays down, and eternal damnation for those who don't.
If not for the promotion of fear, Christianity would have died out
completely centuries ago. These Christian missionaries are only trying to
keep their religion from being wiped out by common sense.
Did the person that murdered Bhutto wear a white shirt, black
tie and ride a bicycle? I doubt it. It's far more likely that the
person
who murdered Bhutto had a Pakistani Army uniform in his closet.
And the guy that blew himself up trying to kill her earlier - but
wasn't close enough. You are thinking he too had a Pakistani Army
uniform in his closet?
Quite possibly. What other explanation can you make for these radicals
being able to get past the security, that Musharraf was supposedly
providing
for his political rival, so easily?
What other explanation?
Playing stupid again? Yes, there is another explanation.
Sure. There are lots of them. One of them is that al Qaeda is pulling
Musharraf's strings. Another is that they're pulling Bush's strings. A
third is that they're just so good at doing this sort of thing that they
somehow duped Bush into encouraging Bhutto to return to Pakistan and duped
Musharraf into pulling Bhutto's security off her. What's YOUR theory?
--
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Governor Swill" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
05 Jan 2008 02:49:37 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:51:31 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
Christianity has ALWAYS been promoted and propogated through
fear.
In what way does this make Christianity unique among religions?
Swill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richardson-Obama in 08" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
05 Jan 2008 10:16:46 AM |
|
|
"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:n3hun3dj6p8ss3beuo01jinavlu9dn2d21@4ax.com...
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:51:31 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
Christianity has ALWAYS been promoted and propogated through
fear.
In what way does this make Christianity unique among religions?
It doesn't, although it's history, and that of Islam, are probably the two
most commonly associated with forced conversion. My point wasn't that
Christianity was any worse than most religions. I was pointing out to the
pro-Christian Zeno that it was really no better. My original comment that
"Fanatics of any creed are a blight on society. Getting rid of all
religions altogether would be utopia, but just getting rid of the fanatics
within each religion would be a good step in the right direction" still
stands.
--
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zeno" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
06 Jan 2008 02:31:52 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:16:46 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
I was pointing out to the
pro-Christian Zeno that ...
You are thinking that anit-muslim is the same as pro-christian?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richardson-Obama in 08" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
06 Jan 2008 03:28:05 PM |
|
|
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:aje2o3dfh5v0ta35lknbik0g4indf954ve@4ax.com...
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:16:46 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
I was pointing out to the
pro-Christian Zeno that ...
You are thinking that anit-muslim is the same as pro-christian?
In 2007 America? Yup.
--
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Governor Swill" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
07 Jan 2008 05:07:20 PM |
|
|
"Richardson-Obama in 08" <NoThanks@NoSpam.com> used a stick in the
sand to babble
You are thinking that anit-muslim is the same as pro-christian?
In 2007 America? Yup.
Let's see. How is that? Does this mean that Buddhists fighting the
war on terror are going to become Baptists?
Swill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richardson-Obama in 08" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
07 Jan 2008 07:29:27 PM |
|
|
"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:73c5o3l4ubnm8hon0j1bejh41telankkh8@4ax.com...
"Richardson-Obama in 08" <NoThanks@NoSpam.com> used a stick in the
sand to babble
You are thinking that anit-muslim is the same as pro-christian?
In 2007 America? Yup.
Let's see. How is that? Does this mean that Buddhists fighting the
war on terror are going to become Baptists?
Buddhists fighting the war on terror see themselves as "fighting against
terrorism". Fundy Christians fighting either the war on terror or the war
against the Iraqi insurgents see themselves as "fighting against Islam".
That's the difference. Bush and the fundys have turned this into a
religious crusade. Most Americans won't buy into that, but those who view
their position in these wars as "anti-Muslim" have.
--
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
06 Jan 2008 05:35:25 PM |
|
|
Richardson-Obama in 08 wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:aje2o3dfh5v0ta35lknbik0g4indf954ve@4ax.com...
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:16:46 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
I was pointing out to the
pro-Christian Zeno that ...
You are thinking that anit-muslim is the same as pro-christian?
In 2007 America? Yup.
Think again. Zero here is a joo, about as anti-Christian as you can get.
My experiences with Muslims have taught me this: Islam respects
Christianity more than the proto-Christian jooz do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richardson-Obama in 08" |
|
| Title: Re: It's been a good year for right wing madness. |
06 Jan 2008 11:03:17 PM |
|
|
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:5ud757F1h1evuU2@mid.individual.net...
Richardson-Obama in 08 wrote:
"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message
news:aje2o3dfh5v0ta35lknbik0g4indf954ve@4ax.com...
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:16:46 -0700, "Richardson-Obama in 08"
<NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote:
I was pointing out to the
pro-Christian Zeno that ...
You are thinking that anit-muslim is the same as pro-christian?
In 2007 America? Yup.
Think again. Zero here is a joo, about as anti-Christian as you can get.
No difference, really. Zionist Jews, fundamentalist Christians and Muslim
fanatics are all basically the same. They're all cut from the same kind of
cloth. The cloth is only dyed slightly differently. Religions, in general,
tend to be very intolerant of each other. There are, of course, exceptions,
like the Unitarians, but most Unitarians don't consider themselves to be
Christians or Jews.
My experiences with Muslims have taught me this: Islam respects
Christianity more than the proto-Christian jooz do.
--
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com
.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
