| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Thebzp" |
| Date: |
15 Apr 2007 08:01:12 PM |
| Object: |
Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years |
From "Iraq: A War For Israel"
By Mark Weber
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/iraqwar.shtml
Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years.
In mid-1996, a policy paper prepared for then-Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu outlined a grand strategy for Israel in the Middle
East. Entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,”
it was written under the auspices of an Israeli think tank, the
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Specifically, it
called for an “effort [that] can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from
power in Iraq, an important Israeli strategic objective in its own
right...” [8]
The authors of “A Clean Break” included Richard Perle, Douglas Feith,
and David Wurmser, three influential Jews who later held high-level
positions in the Bush administration, 2001-2004: Perle as chair of the
Defense Policy Board, Feith as Undersecretary of Defense, and Wurmser as
special assistant to the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control.
The role played by Bush administration officials who are associated with
two major pro-Zionist “neoconservative” research centers has come under
scrutiny from The Nation, the influential public affairs weekly. [9]
The author, Jason Vest, examined the close links between the Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) and the Center for
Security Policy (CSP), detailing the ties between these groups and
various politicians, arms merchants, military men, wealthy pro-Israel
American Jews, and Republican presidential administrations
JINSA and CSP members, notes Vest, “have ascended to powerful government
posts, where... they’ve managed to weave a number of issues – support
for national missile defense, opposition to arms control treaties,
championing of wasteful weapons systems, arms aid to Turkey and American
unilateralism in general – into a hard line, with support for the
Israeli right at its core... On no issue is the JINSA/CSP hard line more
evident than in its relentless campaign for war – not just with Iraq,
but ‘total war,’ as Michael Ledeen, one of the most influential JINSAns
in Washington, put it... For this crew, ‘regime change’ by any means
necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian
Authority is an urgent imperative.”
Samuel Francis, author, editor and columnist, also looked into the
“neo-conservative” role in fomenting war. [10]
“My own answer,” he wrote, “is that the lie [that a massively-armed Iraq
posed a grave and imminent threat to the US] was fabricated by
neo-conservatives in the administration whose first loyalty is to Israel
and its interests and who wanted the United States to smash Iraq because
it was the biggest potential threat to Israel in the region. They are
known to have been pushing for war with Iraq since at least 1996, but
they could not make an effective case for it until after Sept. 11, 2001...”
In the aftermath of the 2001 Nine-Eleven terror attacks, ardently
pro-Zionist “neo-conservatives” in the Bush administration – who for
years had sought a Middle East war to bolster Israel’s security in the
region – exploited the tragedy to press their agenda. In this they were
backed by the Israeli government, which also pressured the White House
to strike Iraq.
“The [Israeli] military and political leadership yearns for war in
Iraq,” reported a leading Israeli daily paper, Haaretz, in February
2002. [11]
The Jerusalem correspondent for the Guardian, the respected British
daily, reported in August 2002: “Israel signalled its decision yesterday
to put public pressure on President George Bush to go ahead with a
military attack on Iraq, even though it believes Saddam Hussein may well
retaliate by striking Israel.” [12]
Three months before the US invasion, the well-informed Washington
journalist Robert Novak reported that Israeli prime minister Sharon was
telling American political leaders that “the greatest US assistance to
Israel would be to overthrow Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi regime.” Moreover,
added Novak, “that view is widely shared inside the Bush administration,
and is a major reason why US forces today are assembling for war.” [13]
Israel’s spy agencies were a “full partner” with the US and Britain in
producing greatly exaggerated prewar assessments of Iraq’s ability to
wage war, a former senior Israeli military intelligence official has
acknowledged. Shlomo Bron, a brigadier general in the Israel army
reserves, and a senior researcher at a major Israeli think tank, said
that intelligence provided by Israel played a significant role in
supporting the US and British case for making war. Israeli intelligence
agencies, he said, “badly overestimated the Iraqi threat to Israel and
reinforced the American and British belief that the weapons [of mass
destruction] existed.” [14]
The role of the pro-Israel lobby in pressing for war is examined in an
81-page research paper by two prominent American scholars, John J.
Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of
Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, professor of international affairs at the
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. [15]
In the paper, “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,” they write:
“Pressure from Israel and the [pro-Israel] Lobby was not the only factor
behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical.
Some Americans believe that this was a war for oil, but there is hardly
any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was
motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure… Within
the United States, the main driving force behind the Iraq war was a
small band of neoconservatives, many with close ties to Israel’s Likud
Party. In addition, key leaders of the Lobby’s major organizations lent
their voices to the campaign for war.”
Important members of the pro-Israel lobby carried out what professors
Mearshiemer and Walt call “an unrelenting public relations campaign to
win support for invading Iraq. A key part of this campaign was the
manipulation of intelligence information, so as to make Saddam look like
an imminent threat.”
For some Jewish leaders, the Iraq war is part of a long-range effort to
install Israel-friendly regimes across the Middle East. Norman
Podhoretz, a prominent Jewish writer and an ardent supporter of Israel,
has been for years editor of Commentary, the influential Zionist
monthly. In the Sept. 2002 issue he wrote:
“The regimes that richly deserve to be overthrown and replaced are not
confined to the three singled-out members of the axis of evil [Iraq,
Iran, North Korea]. At a minimum, the axis should extend to Syria and
Lebanon and Libya, as well as ‘friends’ of America like the Saudi royal
family and Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, along with the Palestinian Authority,
whether headed by Arafat or one of his henchmen.”
Patrick J. Buchanan, the well-known writer and commentator, and former
White House Communications director, has been blunt in identifying those
who pushed for war: [16]
“We charge that a cabal of polemicists and public officials seek to
ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s
interests. We charge them with colluding with Israel to ignite those
wars and destroy the Oslo Accords. We charge them with deliberately
damaging US relations with every state in the Arab world that defies
Israel or supports the Palestinian people’s right to a homeland of their
own. We charge that they have alienated friends and allies all over the
Islamic and Western world through their arrogance, hubris, and
bellicosity...
“Cui Bono? For whose benefit these endless wars in a region that holds
nothing vital to America save oil, which the Arabs must sell us to
survive? Who would benefit from a war of civilizations between the West
and Islam?
“Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel, Sharon, Likud.”
Uri Avnery – an award-winning Israeli journalist and author, and a
three-time member of Israel’s parliament – sees the Iraq war as an
expression of immense Jewish influence and power. In an essay written
some weeks after the US invasion, he wrote: [17]
"Who are the winners? They are the so-called neo-cons, or
neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all of whose members are
Jewish. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well
as in the think-tanks that play an important role in formulating
American policy and the ed-op pages of the influential newspapers...
The immense influence of this largely Jewish group stems from its close
alliance with the extreme right-wing Christian fundamentalists, who
nowadays control Bush's Republican party. ... Seemingly, all this is
good for Israel. America controls the world, we control America. Never
before have Jews exerted such an immense influence on the center of
world power.”
In Britain, a veteran member of Britain’s House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America’s foreign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. “A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy
alliance with fundamentalist Christians,” said Tam Dalyell, a Labour
party deputy and the longest-serving House member. “There is far too
much Jewish influence in the United States,” he added. [18]
--
http://www.investigate911.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years |
15 Apr 2007 08:30:16 PM |
|
|
"a veteran member of Britain's House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America's foreign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. "A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an
unholy
alliance with fundamentalist Christians," said Tam Dalyell, a Labour
party deputy and the longest-serving House member. "There is far too
much Jewish influence in the United States," he added.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------
The United States is controlled by the Zionist cult through AIPAC, the
America Israel Public Affairs Commiteee. Most Americans are either
too stupid or too scared to speak up about it. They would rather bend
over and let the Zionist cult destroy their own country rather than
speak up and make waves. Mind control is a fact of life ion America,
and our BIG BROTHER is the Jewish-Zionist cult. Stealth Jews like
Rupert Murdock and Matt Drudge fan the flames of war, all for God
Israel.
IB
----------------
On Apr 15, 5:01 pm, Thebzp <mathebuzp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
From "Iraq: A War For Israel"
By Mark Weber
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/iraqwar.shtml
Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years.
In mid-1996, a policy paper prepared for then-Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu outlined a grand strategy for Israel in the Middle
East. Entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,"
it was written under the auspices of an Israeli think tank, the
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Specifically, it
called for an "effort [that] can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from
power in Iraq, an important Israeli strategic objective in its own
right..." [8]
The authors of "A Clean Break" included Richard Perle, Douglas Feith,
and David Wurmser, three influential Jews who later held high-level
positions in the Bush administration, 2001-2004: Perle as chair of the
Defense Policy Board, Feith as Undersecretary of Defense, and Wurmser as
special assistant to the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control.
The role played by Bush administration officials who are associated with
two major pro-Zionist "neoconservative" research centers has come under
scrutiny from The Nation, the influential public affairs weekly. [9]
The author, Jason Vest, examined the close links between the Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) and the Center for
Security Policy (CSP), detailing the ties between these groups and
various politicians, arms merchants, military men, wealthy pro-Israel
American Jews, and Republican presidential administrations
JINSA and CSP members, notes Vest, "have ascended to powerful government
posts, where... they've managed to weave a number of issues - support
for national missile defense, opposition to arms control treaties,
championing of wasteful weapons systems, arms aid to Turkey and American
unilateralism in general - into a hard line, with support for the
Israeli right at its core... On no issue is the JINSA/CSP hard line more
evident than in its relentless campaign for war - not just with Iraq,
but 'total war,' as Michael Ledeen, one of the most influential JINSAns
in Washington, put it... For this crew, 'regime change' by any means
necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian
Authority is an urgent imperative."
Samuel Francis, author, editor and columnist, also looked into the
"neo-conservative" role in fomenting war. [10]
"My own answer," he wrote, "is that the lie [that a massively-armed Iraq
posed a grave and imminent threat to the US] was fabricated by
neo-conservatives in the administration whose first loyalty is to Israel
and its interests and who wanted the United States to smash Iraq because
it was the biggest potential threat to Israel in the region. They are
known to have been pushing for war with Iraq since at least 1996, but
they could not make an effective case for it until after Sept. 11, 2001..=
.."
In the aftermath of the 2001 Nine-Eleven terror attacks, ardently
pro-Zionist "neo-conservatives" in the Bush administration - who for
years had sought a Middle East war to bolster Israel's security in the
region - exploited the tragedy to press their agenda. In this they were
backed by the Israeli government, which also pressured the White House
to strike Iraq.
"The [Israeli] military and political leadership yearns for war in
Iraq," reported a leading Israeli daily paper, Haaretz, in February
2002. [11]
The Jerusalem correspondent for the Guardian, the respected British
daily, reported in August 2002: "Israel signalled its decision yesterday
to put public pressure on President George Bush to go ahead with a
military attack on Iraq, even though it believes Saddam Hussein may well
retaliate by striking Israel." [12]
Three months before the US invasion, the well-informed Washington
journalist Robert Novak reported that Israeli prime minister Sharon was
telling American political leaders that "the greatest US assistance to
Israel would be to overthrow Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime." Moreover,
added Novak, "that view is widely shared inside the Bush administration,
and is a major reason why US forces today are assembling for war." [13]
Israel's spy agencies were a "full partner" with the US and Britain in
producing greatly exaggerated prewar assessments of Iraq's ability to
wage war, a former senior Israeli military intelligence official has
acknowledged. Shlomo Bron, a brigadier general in the Israel army
reserves, and a senior researcher at a major Israeli think tank, said
that intelligence provided by Israel played a significant role in
supporting the US and British case for making war. Israeli intelligence
agencies, he said, "badly overestimated the Iraqi threat to Israel and
reinforced the American and British belief that the weapons [of mass
destruction] existed." [14]
The role of the pro-Israel lobby in pressing for war is examined in an
81-page research paper by two prominent American scholars, John J.
Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of
Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, professor of international affairs at the
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. [15]
In the paper, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," they write:
"Pressure from Israel and the [pro-Israel] Lobby was not the only factor
behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical.
Some Americans believe that this was a war for oil, but there is hardly
any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was
motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure... Within
the United States, the main driving force behind the Iraq war was a
small band of neoconservatives, many with close ties to Israel's Likud
Party. In addition, key leaders of the Lobby's major organizations lent
their voices to the campaign for war."
Important members of the pro-Israel lobby carried out what professors
Mearshiemer and Walt call "an unrelenting public relations campaign to
win support for invading Iraq. A key part of this campaign was the
manipulation of intelligence information, so as to make Saddam look like
an imminent threat."
For some Jewish leaders, the Iraq war is part of a long-range effort to
install Israel-friendly regimes across the Middle East. Norman
Podhoretz, a prominent Jewish writer and an ardent supporter of Israel,
has been for years editor of Commentary, the influential Zionist
monthly. In the Sept. 2002 issue he wrote:
"The regimes that richly deserve to be overthrown and replaced are not
confined to the three singled-out members of the axis of evil [Iraq,
Iran, North Korea]. At a minimum, the axis should extend to Syria and
Lebanon and Libya, as well as 'friends' of America like the Saudi royal
family and Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, along with the Palestinian Authority,
whether headed by Arafat or one of his henchmen."
Patrick J. Buchanan, the well-known writer and commentator, and former
White House Communications director, has been blunt in identifying those
who pushed for war: [16]
"We charge that a cabal of polemicists and public officials seek to
ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America's
interests. We charge them with colluding with Israel to ignite those
wars and destroy the Oslo Accords. We charge them with deliberately
damaging US relations with every state in the Arab world that defies
Israel or supports the Palestinian people's right to a homeland of their
own. We charge that they have alienated friends and allies all over the
Islamic and Western world through their arrogance, hubris, and
bellicosity...
"Cui Bono? For whose benefit these endless wars in a region that holds
nothing vital to America save oil, which the Arabs must sell us to
survive? Who would benefit from a war of civilizations between the West
and Islam?
"Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel, Sharon, Likud."
Uri Avnery - an award-winning Israeli journalist and author, and a
three-time member of Israel's parliament - sees the Iraq war as an
expression of immense Jewish influence and power. In an essay written
some weeks after the US invasion, he wrote: [17]
"Who are the winners? They are the so-called neo-cons, or
neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all of whose members are
Jewish. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well
as in the think-tanks that play an important role in formulating
American policy and the ed-op pages of the influential news=ADpapers...
The immense influence of this largely Jewish group stems from its close
alliance with the extreme right-wing Christian fundamentalists, who
nowadays control Bush's Republican party. ... Seemingly, all this is
good for Israel. America controls the world, we control America. Never
before have Jews exerted such an immense influence on the center of
world power."
In Britain, a veteran member of Britain's House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America's foreign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. "A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy
alliance with fundamentalist Christians," said Tam Dalyell, a Labour
party deputy and the longest-serving House member. "There is far too
much Jewish influence in the United States," he added. [18]
--http://www.investigate911.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thebzp" |
|
| Title: Re: Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place foryears |
15 Apr 2007 11:56:26 PM |
|
|
wrote:
"a veteran member of Britain's House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America's foreign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. "A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an
unholy
alliance with fundamentalist Christians," said Tam Dalyell, a Labour
party deputy and the longest-serving House member. "There is far too
much Jewish influence in the United States," he added.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States is controlled by the Zionist cult through AIPAC, the
America Israel Public Affairs Commiteee. Most Americans are either
too stupid or too scared to speak up about it. They would rather bend
over and let the Zionist cult destroy their own country rather than
speak up and make waves. Mind control is a fact of life ion America,
and our BIG BROTHER is the Jewish-Zionist cult. Stealth Jews like
Rupert Murdock and Matt Drudge fan the flames of war, all for God
Israel.
IB
What is Rupert Murdock's link to Israel ? Can you provide a source ?
----------------
On Apr 15, 5:01 pm, Thebzp <mathebuzp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
From "Iraq: A War For Israel"
By Mark Weber
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/iraqwar.shtml
Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years.
In mid-1996, a policy paper prepared for then-Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu outlined a grand strategy for Israel in the Middle
East. Entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,"
it was written under the auspices of an Israeli think tank, the
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Specifically, it
called for an "effort [that] can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from
power in Iraq, an important Israeli strategic objective in its own
right..." [8]
The authors of "A Clean Break" included Richard Perle, Douglas Feith,
and David Wurmser, three influential Jews who later held high-level
positions in the Bush administration, 2001-2004: Perle as chair of the
Defense Policy Board, Feith as Undersecretary of Defense, and Wurmser as
special assistant to the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control.
The role played by Bush administration officials who are associated with
two major pro-Zionist "neoconservative" research centers has come under
scrutiny from The Nation, the influential public affairs weekly. [9]
The author, Jason Vest, examined the close links between the Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) and the Center for
Security Policy (CSP), detailing the ties between these groups and
various politicians, arms merchants, military men, wealthy pro-Israel
American Jews, and Republican presidential administrations
JINSA and CSP members, notes Vest, "have ascended to powerful government
posts, where... they've managed to weave a number of issues - support
for national missile defense, opposition to arms control treaties,
championing of wasteful weapons systems, arms aid to Turkey and American
unilateralism in general - into a hard line, with support for the
Israeli right at its core... On no issue is the JINSA/CSP hard line more
evident than in its relentless campaign for war - not just with Iraq,
but 'total war,' as Michael Ledeen, one of the most influential JINSAns
in Washington, put it... For this crew, 'regime change' by any means
necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian
Authority is an urgent imperative."
Samuel Francis, author, editor and columnist, also looked into the
"neo-conservative" role in fomenting war. [10]
"My own answer," he wrote, "is that the lie [that a massively-armed Iraq
posed a grave and imminent threat to the US] was fabricated by
neo-conservatives in the administration whose first loyalty is to Israel
and its interests and who wanted the United States to smash Iraq because
it was the biggest potential threat to Israel in the region. They are
known to have been pushing for war with Iraq since at least 1996, but
they could not make an effective case for it until after Sept. 11, 2001..."
In the aftermath of the 2001 Nine-Eleven terror attacks, ardently
pro-Zionist "neo-conservatives" in the Bush administration - who for
years had sought a Middle East war to bolster Israel's security in the
region - exploited the tragedy to press their agenda. In this they were
backed by the Israeli government, which also pressured the White House
to strike Iraq.
"The [Israeli] military and political leadership yearns for war in
Iraq," reported a leading Israeli daily paper, Haaretz, in February
2002. [11]
The Jerusalem correspondent for the Guardian, the respected British
daily, reported in August 2002: "Israel signalled its decision yesterday
to put public pressure on President George Bush to go ahead with a
military attack on Iraq, even though it believes Saddam Hussein may well
retaliate by striking Israel." [12]
Three months before the US invasion, the well-informed Washington
journalist Robert Novak reported that Israeli prime minister Sharon was
telling American political leaders that "the greatest US assistance to
Israel would be to overthrow Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime." Moreover,
added Novak, "that view is widely shared inside the Bush administration,
and is a major reason why US forces today are assembling for war." [13]
Israel's spy agencies were a "full partner" with the US and Britain in
producing greatly exaggerated prewar assessments of Iraq's ability to
wage war, a former senior Israeli military intelligence official has
acknowledged. Shlomo Bron, a brigadier general in the Israel army
reserves, and a senior researcher at a major Israeli think tank, said
that intelligence provided by Israel played a significant role in
supporting the US and British case for making war. Israeli intelligence
agencies, he said, "badly overestimated the Iraqi threat to Israel and
reinforced the American and British belief that the weapons [of mass
destruction] existed." [14]
The role of the pro-Israel lobby in pressing for war is examined in an
81-page research paper by two prominent American scholars, John J.
Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of
Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, professor of international affairs at the
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. [15]
In the paper, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," they write:
"Pressure from Israel and the [pro-Israel] Lobby was not the only factor
behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical.
Some Americans believe that this was a war for oil, but there is hardly
any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was
motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure... Within
the United States, the main driving force behind the Iraq war was a
small band of neoconservatives, many with close ties to Israel's Likud
Party. In addition, key leaders of the Lobby's major organizations lent
their voices to the campaign for war."
Important members of the pro-Israel lobby carried out what professors
Mearshiemer and Walt call "an unrelenting public relations campaign to
win support for invading Iraq. A key part of this campaign was the
manipulation of intelligence information, so as to make Saddam look like
an imminent threat."
For some Jewish leaders, the Iraq war is part of a long-range effort to
install Israel-friendly regimes across the Middle East. Norman
Podhoretz, a prominent Jewish writer and an ardent supporter of Israel,
has been for years editor of Commentary, the influential Zionist
monthly. In the Sept. 2002 issue he wrote:
"The regimes that richly deserve to be overthrown and replaced are not
confined to the three singled-out members of the axis of evil [Iraq,
Iran, North Korea]. At a minimum, the axis should extend to Syria and
Lebanon and Libya, as well as 'friends' of America like the Saudi royal
family and Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, along with the Palestinian Authority,
whether headed by Arafat or one of his henchmen."
Patrick J. Buchanan, the well-known writer and commentator, and former
White House Communications director, has been blunt in identifying those
who pushed for war: [16]
"We charge that a cabal of polemicists and public officials seek to
ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America's
interests. We charge them with colluding with Israel to ignite those
wars and destroy the Oslo Accords. We charge them with deliberately
damaging US relations with every state in the Arab world that defies
Israel or supports the Palestinian people's right to a homeland of their
own. We charge that they have alienated friends and allies all over the
Islamic and Western world through their arrogance, hubris, and
bellicosity...
"Cui Bono? For whose benefit these endless wars in a region that holds
nothing vital to America save oil, which the Arabs must sell us to
survive? Who would benefit from a war of civilizations between the West
and Islam?
"Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel, Sharon, Likud."
Uri Avnery - an award-winning Israeli journalist and author, and a
three-time member of Israel's parliament - sees the Iraq war as an
expression of immense Jewish influence and power. In an essay written
some weeks after the US invasion, he wrote: [17]
"Who are the winners? They are the so-called neo-cons, or
neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all of whose members are
Jewish. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well
as in the think-tanks that play an important role in formulating
American policy and the ed-op pages of the influential newspapers...
The immense influence of this largely Jewish group stems from its close
alliance with the extreme right-wing Christian fundamentalists, who
nowadays control Bush's Republican party. ... Seemingly, all this is
good for Israel. America controls the world, we control America. Never
before have Jews exerted such an immense influence on the center of
world power."
In Britain, a veteran member of Britain's House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America's foreign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. "A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy
alliance with fundamentalist Christians," said Tam Dalyell, a Labour
party deputy and the longest-serving House member. "There is far too
much Jewish influence in the United States," he added. [18]
--http://www.investigate911.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
--
http://www.investigate911.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docky Wocky" |
|
| Title: Re: Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years |
16 Apr 2007 08:25:22 AM |
|
|
How long have Islamic jihadist plans for the extermination of Israel been in
place?
It would appear there is a stand-off, at least in the plans department.
.
|
|
|
| User: "hopeful" |
|
| Title: Re: Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years |
16 Apr 2007 08:42:39 AM |
|
|
"Docky Wocky" <mrchuck@lst.net> wrote in message
news:6PKUh.1921$xP.249@trnddc04...
How long have Islamic jihadist plans for the extermination of Israel been
in place?
It would appear there is a stand-off, at least in the plans department.
" ... 10. The United States was anxious to have other countries supply
assistance to Iraq. For example, in 1984, the Israelis concluded that
Iran was more dangerous than Iraq to Israel's existence due to the growing
Iranian influence and presence in Lebanon. The Israelis approached the
United States in a meeting in Jerusalem that I attended with Donald
Rumsfeld. Israeli Foreign Minister Yitzhak Shamir asked Rumsfeld if the
United States would deliver a secret offer of Israeli assistance to Iraq.
The United States agreed. I travelled wtih Rumsfeld to Baghdad and was
present at the meeting in which Rumsfeld told Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq
Aziz about Israel's offer of assistance. Aziz refused even to accept the
Israelis' letter to Hussein offering assistance, because Aziz told us that
he would be executed on the spot by Hussein if he did so. ..." from "teicher
+article1413.htm"
Look up the myth the Jews use to justify their aggression. It covers land
from the great river in Egypt to the Euphrates. Look up aipac, jinsa and
zoa just for starters. Then go to jbuff.com for more on the plans and
tactics of the zionists. Then lookup christian-zionist
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place foryears |
16 Apr 2007 12:38:13 AM |
|
|
Thebzp wrote:
inkyblacks@yahoo.com wrote:
"a veteran member of Britain's House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America's foreign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. "A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an
unholy
alliance with fundamentalist Christians," said Tam Dalyell, a Labour
party deputy and the longest-serving House member. "There is far too
much Jewish influence in the United States," he added.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States is controlled by the Zionist cult through AIPAC, the
America Israel Public Affairs Commiteee. Most Americans are either
too stupid or too scared to speak up about it. They would rather bend
over and let the Zionist cult destroy their own country rather than
speak up and make waves. Mind control is a fact of life ion America,
and our BIG BROTHER is the Jewish-Zionist cult. Stealth Jews like
Rupert Murdock and Matt Drudge fan the flames of war, all for God
Israel.
IB
What is Rupert Murdock's link to Israel ? Can you provide a source ?
He's a zioNist
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-entertainment-news-monopoly-murdoch-jew-part4.html
----------------
On Apr 15, 5:01 pm, Thebzp <mathebuzp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
From "Iraq: A War For Israel"
By Mark Weber
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/iraqwar.shtml
Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years.
In mid-1996, a policy paper prepared for then-Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu outlined a grand strategy for Israel in the Middle
East. Entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,"
it was written under the auspices of an Israeli think tank, the
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Specifically, it
called for an "effort [that] can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from
power in Iraq, an important Israeli strategic objective in its own
right..." [8]
The authors of "A Clean Break" included Richard Perle, Douglas Feith,
and David Wurmser, three influential Jews who later held high-level
positions in the Bush administration, 2001-2004: Perle as chair of the
Defense Policy Board, Feith as Undersecretary of Defense, and Wurmser as
special assistant to the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control.
The role played by Bush administration officials who are associated with
two major pro-Zionist "neoconservative" research centers has come under
scrutiny from The Nation, the influential public affairs weekly. [9]
The author, Jason Vest, examined the close links between the Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) and the Center for
Security Policy (CSP), detailing the ties between these groups and
various politicians, arms merchants, military men, wealthy pro-Israel
American Jews, and Republican presidential administrations
JINSA and CSP members, notes Vest, "have ascended to powerful government
posts, where... they've managed to weave a number of issues - support
for national missile defense, opposition to arms control treaties,
championing of wasteful weapons systems, arms aid to Turkey and American
unilateralism in general - into a hard line, with support for the
Israeli right at its core... On no issue is the JINSA/CSP hard line more
evident than in its relentless campaign for war - not just with Iraq,
but 'total war,' as Michael Ledeen, one of the most influential JINSAns
in Washington, put it... For this crew, 'regime change' by any means
necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian
Authority is an urgent imperative."
Samuel Francis, author, editor and columnist, also looked into the
"neo-conservative" role in fomenting war. [10]
"My own answer," he wrote, "is that the lie [that a massively-armed Iraq
posed a grave and imminent threat to the US] was fabricated by
neo-conservatives in the administration whose first loyalty is to Israel
and its interests and who wanted the United States to smash Iraq because
it was the biggest potential threat to Israel in the region. They are
known to have been pushing for war with Iraq since at least 1996, but
they could not make an effective case for it until after Sept. 11,
2001..."
In the aftermath of the 2001 Nine-Eleven terror attacks, ardently
pro-Zionist "neo-conservatives" in the Bush administration - who for
years had sought a Middle East war to bolster Israel's security in the
region - exploited the tragedy to press their agenda. In this they were
backed by the Israeli government, which also pressured the White House
to strike Iraq.
"The [Israeli] military and political leadership yearns for war in
Iraq," reported a leading Israeli daily paper, Haaretz, in February
2002. [11]
The Jerusalem correspondent for the Guardian, the respected British
daily, reported in August 2002: "Israel signalled its decision yesterday
to put public pressure on President George Bush to go ahead with a
military attack on Iraq, even though it believes Saddam Hussein may well
retaliate by striking Israel." [12]
Three months before the US invasion, the well-informed Washington
journalist Robert Novak reported that Israeli prime minister Sharon was
telling American political leaders that "the greatest US assistance to
Israel would be to overthrow Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime." Moreover,
added Novak, "that view is widely shared inside the Bush administration,
and is a major reason why US forces today are assembling for war." [13]
Israel's spy agencies were a "full partner" with the US and Britain in
producing greatly exaggerated prewar assessments of Iraq's ability to
wage war, a former senior Israeli military intelligence official has
acknowledged. Shlomo Bron, a brigadier general in the Israel army
reserves, and a senior researcher at a major Israeli think tank, said
that intelligence provided by Israel played a significant role in
supporting the US and British case for making war. Israeli intelligence
agencies, he said, "badly overestimated the Iraqi threat to Israel and
reinforced the American and British belief that the weapons [of mass
destruction] existed." [14]
The role of the pro-Israel lobby in pressing for war is examined in an
81-page research paper by two prominent American scholars, John J.
Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of
Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, professor of international affairs at the
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. [15]
In the paper, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," they write:
"Pressure from Israel and the [pro-Israel] Lobby was not the only factor
behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical.
Some Americans believe that this was a war for oil, but there is hardly
any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was
motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure... Within
the United States, the main driving force behind the Iraq war was a
small band of neoconservatives, many with close ties to Israel's Likud
Party. In addition, key leaders of the Lobby's major organizations lent
their voices to the campaign for war."
Important members of the pro-Israel lobby carried out what professors
Mearshiemer and Walt call "an unrelenting public relations campaign to
win support for invading Iraq. A key part of this campaign was the
manipulation of intelligence information, so as to make Saddam look like
an imminent threat."
For some Jewish leaders, the Iraq war is part of a long-range effort to
install Israel-friendly regimes across the Middle East. Norman
Podhoretz, a prominent Jewish writer and an ardent supporter of Israel,
has been for years editor of Commentary, the influential Zionist
monthly. In the Sept. 2002 issue he wrote:
"The regimes that richly deserve to be overthrown and replaced are not
confined to the three singled-out members of the axis of evil [Iraq,
Iran, North Korea]. At a minimum, the axis should extend to Syria and
Lebanon and Libya, as well as 'friends' of America like the Saudi royal
family and Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, along with the Palestinian Authority,
whether headed by Arafat or one of his henchmen."
Patrick J. Buchanan, the well-known writer and commentator, and former
White House Communications director, has been blunt in identifying those
who pushed for war: [16]
"We charge that a cabal of polemicists and public officials seek to
ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America's
interests. We charge them with colluding with Israel to ignite those
wars and destroy the Oslo Accords. We charge them with deliberately
damaging US relations with every state in the Arab world that defies
Israel or supports the Palestinian people's right to a homeland of their
own. We charge that they have alienated friends and allies all over the
Islamic and Western world through their arrogance, hubris, and
bellicosity...
"Cui Bono? For whose benefit these endless wars in a region that holds
nothing vital to America save oil, which the Arabs must sell us to
survive? Who would benefit from a war of civilizations between the West
and Islam?
"Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel, Sharon, Likud."
Uri Avnery - an award-winning Israeli journalist and author, and a
three-time member of Israel's parliament - sees the Iraq war as an
expression of immense Jewish influence and power. In an essay written
some weeks after the US invasion, he wrote: [17]
"Who are the winners? They are the so-called neo-cons, or
neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all of whose members are
Jewish. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well
as in the think-tanks that play an important role in formulating
American policy and the ed-op pages of the influential newspapers...
The immense influence of this largely Jewish group stems from its close
alliance with the extreme right-wing Christian fundamentalists, who
nowadays control Bush's Republican party. ... Seemingly, all this is
good for Israel. America controls the world, we control America. Never
before have Jews exerted such an immense influence on the center of
world power."
In Britain, a veteran member of Britain's House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America's foreign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. "A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy
alliance with fundamentalist Christians," said Tam Dalyell, a Labour
party deputy and the longest-serving House member. "There is far too
much Jewish influence in the United States," he added. [18]
--http://www.investigate911.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kinsship" |
|
| Title: Re: Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years |
15 Apr 2007 09:27:09 PM |
|
|
interesting how the cia and british cia listened to jews when they didn't
have to meanwhile millions of muslims have been allowed to immigrate and the
people with the real weapons Iran is still building nucs.. Jews what power..
for decades the same hate without any proof .. meanwhile I am paying more
money to the Arabs..then everything in my life combined... they still
terrorize... have 99 percent of land people and oil in mideast and they are
coming to our shores by the Millions.. some power of the jews aye?
<inkyblacks@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1176687016.334240.120140@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
"a veteran member of Britain's House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America's foreign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. "A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an
unholy
alliance with fundamentalist Christians," said Tam Dalyell, a Labour
party deputy and the longest-serving House member. "There is far too
much Jewish influence in the United States," he added.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States is controlled by the Zionist cult through AIPAC, the
America Israel Public Affairs Commiteee. Most Americans are either
too stupid or too scared to speak up about it. They would rather bend
over and let the Zionist cult destroy their own country rather than
speak up and make waves. Mind control is a fact of life ion America,
and our BIG BROTHER is the Jewish-Zionist cult. Stealth Jews like
Rupert Murdock and Matt Drudge fan the flames of war, all for God
Israel.
IB
----------------
On Apr 15, 5:01 pm, Thebzp <mathebuzp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
From "Iraq: A War For Israel"
By Mark Weber
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/iraqwar.shtml
Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years.
In mid-1996, a policy paper prepared for then-Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu outlined a grand strategy for Israel in the Middle
East. Entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,"
it was written under the auspices of an Israeli think tank, the
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Specifically, it
called for an "effort [that] can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from
power in Iraq, an important Israeli strategic objective in its own
right..." [8]
The authors of "A Clean Break" included Richard Perle, Douglas Feith,
and David Wurmser, three influential Jews who later held high-level
positions in the Bush administration, 2001-2004: Perle as chair of the
Defense Policy Board, Feith as Undersecretary of Defense, and Wurmser as
special assistant to the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control.
The role played by Bush administration officials who are associated with
two major pro-Zionist "neoconservative" research centers has come under
scrutiny from The Nation, the influential public affairs weekly. [9]
The author, Jason Vest, examined the close links between the Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) and the Center for
Security Policy (CSP), detailing the ties between these groups and
various politicians, arms merchants, military men, wealthy pro-Israel
American Jews, and Republican presidential administrations
JINSA and CSP members, notes Vest, "have ascended to powerful government
posts, where... they've managed to weave a number of issues - support
for national missile defense, opposition to arms control treaties,
championing of wasteful weapons systems, arms aid to Turkey and American
unilateralism in general - into a hard line, with support for the
Israeli right at its core... On no issue is the JINSA/CSP hard line more
evident than in its relentless campaign for war - not just with Iraq,
but 'total war,' as Michael Ledeen, one of the most influential JINSAns
in Washington, put it... For this crew, 'regime change' by any means
necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian
Authority is an urgent imperative."
Samuel Francis, author, editor and columnist, also looked into the
"neo-conservative" role in fomenting war. [10]
"My own answer," he wrote, "is that the lie [that a massively-armed Iraq
posed a grave and imminent threat to the US] was fabricated by
neo-conservatives in the administration whose first loyalty is to Israel
and its interests and who wanted the United States to smash Iraq because
it was the biggest potential threat to Israel in the region. They are
known to have been pushing for war with Iraq since at least 1996, but
they could not make an effective case for it until after Sept. 11,
2001..."
In the aftermath of the 2001 Nine-Eleven terror attacks, ardently
pro-Zionist "neo-conservatives" in the Bush administration - who for
years had sought a Middle East war to bolster Israel's security in the
region - exploited the tragedy to press their agenda. In this they were
backed by the Israeli government, which also pressured the White House
to strike Iraq.
"The [Israeli] military and political leadership yearns for war in
Iraq," reported a leading Israeli daily paper, Haaretz, in February
2002. [11]
The Jerusalem correspondent for the Guardian, the respected British
daily, reported in August 2002: "Israel signalled its decision yesterday
to put public pressure on President George Bush to go ahead with a
military attack on Iraq, even though it believes Saddam Hussein may well
retaliate by striking Israel." [12]
Three months before the US invasion, the well-informed Washington
journalist Robert Novak reported that Israeli prime minister Sharon was
telling American political leaders that "the greatest US assistance to
Israel would be to overthrow Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime." Moreover,
added Novak, "that view is widely shared inside the Bush administration,
and is a major reason why US forces today are assembling for war." [13]
Israel's spy agencies were a "full partner" with the US and Britain in
producing greatly exaggerated prewar assessments of Iraq's ability to
wage war, a former senior Israeli military intelligence official has
acknowledged. Shlomo Bron, a brigadier general in the Israel army
reserves, and a senior researcher at a major Israeli think tank, said
that intelligence provided by Israel played a significant role in
supporting the US and British case for making war. Israeli intelligence
agencies, he said, "badly overestimated the Iraqi threat to Israel and
reinforced the American and British belief that the weapons [of mass
destruction] existed." [14]
The role of the pro-Israel lobby in pressing for war is examined in an
81-page research paper by two prominent American scholars, John J.
Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of
Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, professor of international affairs at the
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. [15]
In the paper, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," they write:
"Pressure from Israel and the [pro-Israel] Lobby was not the only factor
behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical.
Some Americans believe that this was a war for oil, but there is hardly
any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was
motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure... Within
the United States, the main driving force behind the Iraq war was a
small band of neoconservatives, many with close ties to Israel's Likud
Party. In addition, key leaders of the Lobby's major organizations lent
their voices to the campaign for war."
Important members of the pro-Israel lobby carried out what professors
Mearshiemer and Walt call "an unrelenting public relations campaign to
win support for invading Iraq. A key part of this campaign was the
manipulation of intelligence information, so as to make Saddam look like
an imminent threat."
For some Jewish leaders, the Iraq war is part of a long-range effort to
install Israel-friendly regimes across the Middle East. Norman
Podhoretz, a prominent Jewish writer and an ardent supporter of Israel,
has been for years editor of Commentary, the influential Zionist
monthly. In the Sept. 2002 issue he wrote:
"The regimes that richly deserve to be overthrown and replaced are not
confined to the three singled-out members of the axis of evil [Iraq,
Iran, North Korea]. At a minimum, the axis should extend to Syria and
Lebanon and Libya, as well as 'friends' of America like the Saudi royal
family and Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, along with the Palestinian Authority,
whether headed by Arafat or one of his henchmen."
Patrick J. Buchanan, the well-known writer and commentator, and former
White House Communications director, has been blunt in identifying those
who pushed for war: [16]
"We charge that a cabal of polemicists and public officials seek to
ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America's
interests. We charge them with colluding with Israel to ignite those
wars and destroy the Oslo Accords. We charge them with deliberately
damaging US relations with every state in the Arab world that defies
Israel or supports the Palestinian people's right to a homeland of their
own. We charge that they have alienated friends and allies all over the
Islamic and Western world through their arrogance, hubris, and
bellicosity...
"Cui Bono? For whose benefit these endless wars in a region that holds
nothing vital to America save oil, which the Arabs must sell us to
survive? Who would benefit from a war of civilizations between the West
and Islam?
"Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel, Sharon, Likud."
Uri Avnery - an award-winning Israeli journalist and author, and a
three-time member of Israel's parliament - sees the Iraq war as an
expression of immense Jewish influence and power. In an essay written
some weeks after the US invasion, he wrote: [17]
"Who are the winners? They are the so-called neo-cons, or
neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all of whose members are
Jewish. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well
as in the think-tanks that play an important role in formulating
American policy and the ed-op pages of the influential newspapers...
The immense influence of this largely Jewish group stems from its close
alliance with the extreme right-wing Christian fundamentalists, who
nowadays control Bush's Republican party. ... Seemingly, all this is
good for Israel. America controls the world, we control America. Never
before have Jews exerted such an immense influence on the center of
world power."
In Britain, a veteran member of Britain's House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America's foreign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. "A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy
alliance with fundamentalist Christians," said Tam Dalyell, a Labour
party deputy and the longest-serving House member. "There is far too
much Jewish influence in the United States," he added. [18]
--http://www.investigate911.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
