| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
30 Jul 2005 06:37:32 PM |
| Object: |
Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer Rouge
regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic animosity
and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce repression, misery, and
murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
.
|
|
| User: "Rudy Canoza" |
|
| Title: Re: Pseudo-Harry Hope, dissembling ***** |
30 Jul 2005 06:55:24 PM |
|
|
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives
Some 40% of it occurred under the administration of
Gerald Ford.
You were saying about Carter?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wayne H. Wilhelm" |
|
| Title: Re: Pseudo-Harry Hope, dissembling ***** |
30 Jul 2005 07:36:02 PM |
|
|
"Rudy Canoza" <someguy@ph.con> wrote in message
news:MrUGe.11407$oZ.4356@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives
Some 40% of it occurred under the administration of Gerald Ford.
You were saying about Carter?
My understanding is the Cambodian genocide was the direct result of John
Kerry and his friends who defended the North Vietnamese. John Kerry's
protests along with the Demcorat controlled Congress who refused to allow
any true military action, the United States had no choice but to withdraw
from Vietnam. It was then that the North Vietnamese began the genocide of
Combodia. If it hadn't been for the likes of John Kerry, the North
Vietnamese would have lost the war and would have been unable to continue
their operations in Cambodia.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Pseudo-Harry Hope, dissembling ***** |
30 Jul 2005 08:04:16 PM |
|
|
"Wayne H. Wilhelm" <minewwilhelm@neo.rr.com> wrote in message
news:S1VGe.39630$yC5.18716@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
"Rudy Canoza" <someguy@ph.con> wrote in message
news:MrUGe.11407$oZ.4356@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives
Some 40% of it occurred under the administration of Gerald Ford.
You were saying about Carter?
My understanding is the Cambodian genocide was the direct result of John
Kerry and his friends who defended the North Vietnamese. John Kerry's
protests along with the Demcorat controlled Congress who refused to allow
any true military action, the United States had no choice but to withdraw
from Vietnam. It was then that the North Vietnamese began the genocide of
Combodia. If it hadn't been for the likes of John Kerry, the North
Vietnamese would have lost the war and would have been unable to continue
their operations in Cambodia.
LMAO! And Kerry caused the oil shortages in the 70s, too! :)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Oilers" |
|
| Title: Re: Pseudo-Harry Hope, dissembling ***** |
30 Jul 2005 10:01:09 PM |
|
|
<dan@dan.com> wrote in message news:n6CdncgHJqxfvnHfRVn-3A@comcast.com...
"Wayne H. Wilhelm" <minewwilhelm@neo.rr.com> wrote in message
news:S1VGe.39630$yC5.18716@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
"Rudy Canoza" <someguy@ph.con> wrote in message
news:MrUGe.11407$oZ.4356@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7
million
people lost their lives
Some 40% of it occurred under the administration of Gerald Ford.
You were saying about Carter?
My understanding is the Cambodian genocide was the direct result of John
Kerry and his friends who defended the North Vietnamese. John Kerry's
protests along with the Demcorat controlled Congress who refused to
allow
any true military action, the United States had no choice but to
withdraw
from Vietnam. It was then that the North Vietnamese began the genocide
of
Combodia. If it hadn't been for the likes of John Kerry, the North
Vietnamese would have lost the war and would have been unable to
continue
their operations in Cambodia.
LMAO! And Kerry caused the oil shortages in the 70s, too! :)
Maybe John Kerry caused Bush to fall off his bike 45 times, choke on finger
foods, do coke, get arrested for DUI, and marry a murderer.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rudy Canoza" |
|
| Title: Re: Pseudo-Harry Hope, dissembling ***** |
30 Jul 2005 09:53:45 PM |
|
|
Wayne H. Wilhelm wrote:
"Rudy Canoza" <someguy@ph.con> wrote in message
news:MrUGe.11407$oZ.4356@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives
Some 40% of it occurred under the administration of Gerald Ford.
You were saying about Carter?
My understanding is the Cambodian genocide was the direct result of John
Kerry and his friends who defended the North Vietnamese.
No. It was Wendell Willkie. Look it up.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "swayser" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 06:49:37 PM |
|
|
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer Rouge
regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic animosity
and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce repression, misery, and
murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist KLA.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Oilers" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 06:55:25 PM |
|
|
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of
the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge
regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity
and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce repression, misery,
and
murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist KLA.
UN Resolution has 55/2 has been totally ignored by many more US presidents
then Clinton.
.
|
|
|
| User: "swayser" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 09:42:08 PM |
|
|
Oilers wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of
the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge
regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity
and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce repression, misery,
and
murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist KLA.
UN Resolution has 55/2 has been totally ignored by many more US presidents
then Clinton.
Really? Kindly explain who and the circumstances.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Oilers" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 09:53:49 PM |
|
|
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:eSWGe.7018$_R1.4819@fe11.lga...
Oilers wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of
the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge
regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity
and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce repression,
misery,
and
murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist KLA.
UN Resolution has 55/2 has been totally ignored by many more US
presidents
then Clinton.
Really? Kindly explain who and the circumstances.
You're joking right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "swayser" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 11:53:19 PM |
|
|
Oilers wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:eSWGe.7018$_R1.4819@fe11.lga...
Oilers wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of
the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge
regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity
and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce repression,
misery,
and
murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist KLA.
UN Resolution has 55/2 has been totally ignored by many more US
presidents
then Clinton.
Really? Kindly explain who and the circumstances.
You're joking right?
You're an idiot, right? I very politely requested some information and
now you're balking at supplying it. Why?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 08:07:19 PM |
|
|
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce
repression, misery, and murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim terrorist
KLA.
And where does INVADING a nation that was no threat to us, in the process
killing 10s of thousands of innocents, come into the picture? Oh, that's
right, Dubya can do no wrong, even when he does.
.
|
|
|
| User: "swayser" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 09:48:23 PM |
|
|
wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce
repression, misery, and murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim terrorist
KLA.
And where does INVADING a nation that was no threat to us, in the process
killing 10s of thousands of innocents, come into the picture? Oh, that's
right, Dubya can do no wrong, even when he does.
Hey stupid read the resolution. We took out an expansionist totalitarian
dictator more dangerous than Hitler. And search all you want there is NO
resolution prohibiting making war on such a power that endangers the
economies of every industrialized nation in the world, including ours.
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the war
more vigorously.
So ***** stupid. You're just an ignorant little jerk off rat.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Oilers" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 09:58:53 PM |
|
|
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:5YWGe.7019$_R1.3946@fe11.lga...
dan@dan.com wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7
million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of
the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce
repression, misery, and murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist
KLA.
And where does INVADING a nation that was no threat to us, in the
process
killing 10s of thousands of innocents, come into the picture? Oh, that's
right, Dubya can do no wrong, even when he does.
Hey stupid read the resolution. We took out an expansionist totalitarian
dictator more dangerous than Hitler. And search all you want there is NO
resolution prohibiting making war on such a power that endangers the
economies of every industrialized nation in the world, including ours.
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the war
more vigorously.
So ***** stupid. You're just an ignorant little jerk off rat.
You compare Saddam to Hitler and you call dan stupid? ***** you have to be a
Republican, there is no other explanation.
Bush is a moron, and you are even more of a moron for buying into the
'official' reasons for this so called war. Oh wait, pardon me, now we are
calling it 'The Struggle Against Extremeism' or some other *****. I
guess when nobody wants to join the military anymore it calls for desperate
measures.
Don't worry though, even if there is a draft, I'm sure you'll get a wart on
your ***** or some other medical excuse to get out of it. That is the
conservative way afterall, just ask 99% of the Bush Administration.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 11:46:08 PM |
|
|
"Oilers" <rockmal@shaw_net.ca> wrote in message
news:N7XGe.71745$s54.14316@pd7tw2no...
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:5YWGe.7019$_R1.3946@fe11.lga...
dan@dan.com wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7
million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of
the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and
more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce
repression, misery, and murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with
the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist
KLA.
And where does INVADING a nation that was no threat to us, in the
process
killing 10s of thousands of innocents, come into the picture? Oh,
that's
right, Dubya can do no wrong, even when he does.
Hey stupid read the resolution. We took out an expansionist totalitarian
dictator more dangerous than Hitler. And search all you want there is NO
resolution prohibiting making war on such a power that endangers the
economies of every industrialized nation in the world, including ours.
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the war
more vigorously.
So ***** stupid. You're just an ignorant little jerk off rat.
You compare Saddam to Hitler and you call dan stupid? ***** you have to be
a
Republican, there is no other explanation.
Truer words were never spoken.
Bush is a moron, and you are even more of a moron for buying into the
'official' reasons for this so called war. Oh wait, pardon me, now we are
calling it 'The Struggle Against Extremeism' or some other *****. I
guess when nobody wants to join the military anymore it calls for
desperate
measures.
Don't worry though, even if there is a draft, I'm sure you'll get a wart
on
your ***** or some other medical excuse to get out of it. That is the
conservative way afterall, just ask 99% of the Bush Administration.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "swayser" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 11:43:04 PM |
|
|
Oilers wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:5YWGe.7019$_R1.3946@fe11.lga...
dan@dan.com wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7
million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of
the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce
repression, misery, and murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist
KLA.
And where does INVADING a nation that was no threat to us, in the
process
killing 10s of thousands of innocents, come into the picture? Oh, that's
right, Dubya can do no wrong, even when he does.
Hey stupid read the resolution. We took out an expansionist totalitarian
dictator more dangerous than Hitler. And search all you want there is NO
resolution prohibiting making war on such a power that endangers the
economies of every industrialized nation in the world, including ours.
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the war
more vigorously.
So ***** stupid. You're just an ignorant little jerk off rat.
You compare Saddam to Hitler and you call dan stupid? ***** you have to be a
Republican, there is no other explanation.
Let's see you're one of these stupid people who think Hitler was a
credible threat and Hussein wasn't. Let's examine that, shall we. Nazi
Germany had no way to get at America. It took the might of the combined
British Royal Navy and air force and the American Navy and air force to
land 10 divisions, two of them airborne across 30 miles of the English
channel in Normandy. That entailed using over 4,000 ships, 6,000 landing
craft and 11,000 aircraft. That was against no naval opposition. The
Kreigsmarine didn't exist for any practical purpose and there wasn't a
single German aircraft that could even REACH America. So why don't you
explain to use how Hitler could have landed and supplied an invading
force over 3,000 miles of the turbulent Atlantic Ocean. Hell, he
couldn't even invade England when he had an overwhelmingly superior
army. He also couldn't threaten our economy. We supplied all our own oil
at the time. And we had the Atomic Bomb in 1945, and the means to
deliver it, and Hitler had neither.
Hussein on the other hand amply demonstrated his ambition to control
Persian Gulf oil. Iraq is the third largest oil producer 10%. In 1980 he
attacked Iran #4 9% and ten years later #2 12%. Maybe you need a road
map to find your face, very few others do. Had Hussein attained hegemony
over the Persian gulf he would have had the industrialized nations by
their throats.
I know you never actually managed to think of that which makes you as
stupid as dan.
Bush is a moron, and you are even more of a moron for buying into the
'official' reasons for this so called war. Oh wait, pardon me, now we are
calling it 'The Struggle Against Extremeism' or some other *****. I
guess when nobody wants to join the military anymore it calls for desperate
measures.
You're again proving your stupidity. I never bought the WMD theory and
have repeatedly said so. I know too much about nerve agents'
capabilities and limitations. They're lousy battlefield weapons. Troops
carry protective suits which will defeat their danger and even a mental
midget can figure out their limitations as a terrorist weapon. Nerve
agents are liquids, not gases. The tip off was the AUM attack on the
Tokyo subway system. They dropped containers of Sarin in four different
places and killed 12 people. Because it's a liquid stupid. It's heavier
than air. And one has to come in physical contact with the stuff to
kill. In very rare circumstances MAYBE the fumes will kill but mostly
they'll just make one sick, not dead.
Don't worry though, even if there is a draft, I'm sure you'll get a wart on
your ***** or some other medical excuse to get out of it. That is the
conservative way afterall, just ask 99% of the Bush Administration.
Again you're being an *****. I was drafted in 1967 moron. Only morons
speak about that of which they know nothing.
You're just another ignorant ***** rat.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 11:50:13 PM |
|
|
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:DDYGe.6708$6%2.386@fe10.lga...
Oilers wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:5YWGe.7019$_R1.3946@fe11.lga...
dan@dan.com wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7
million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of
the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and
more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce
repression, misery, and murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with
the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist
KLA.
And where does INVADING a nation that was no threat to us, in the
process
killing 10s of thousands of innocents, come into the picture? Oh, that's
right, Dubya can do no wrong, even when he does.
Hey stupid read the resolution. We took out an expansionist totalitarian
dictator more dangerous than Hitler. And search all you want there is NO
resolution prohibiting making war on such a power that endangers the
economies of every industrialized nation in the world, including ours.
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the war
more vigorously.
So ***** stupid. You're just an ignorant little jerk off rat.
You compare Saddam to Hitler and you call dan stupid? ***** you have to
be a
Republican, there is no other explanation.
Let's see you're one of these stupid people who think Hitler was a
credible threat and Hussein wasn't. Let's examine that, shall we. Nazi
Germany had no way to get at America. It took the might of the combined
British Royal Navy and air force and the American Navy and air force to
land 10 divisions, two of them airborne across 30 miles of the English
channel in Normandy. That entailed using over 4,000 ships, 6,000 landing
craft and 11,000 aircraft. That was against no naval opposition. The
Kreigsmarine didn't exist for any practical purpose and there wasn't a
single German aircraft that could even REACH America. So why don't you
explain to use how Hitler could have landed and supplied an invading force
over 3,000 miles of the turbulent Atlantic Ocean. Hell, he couldn't even
invade England when he had an overwhelmingly superior army. He also
couldn't threaten our economy. We supplied all our own oil at the time.
And we had the Atomic Bomb in 1945, and the means to deliver it, and
Hitler had neither.
Hussein on the other hand amply demonstrated his ambition to control
Persian Gulf oil. Iraq is the third largest oil producer 10%. In 1980 he
attacked Iran #4 9% and ten years later #2 12%. Maybe you need a road map
to find your face, very few others do. Had Hussein attained hegemony over
the Persian gulf he would have had the industrialized nations by their
throats.
What had he done, other than shooting at our planes, since the Gulf War? You
fucking retard, your brain is smaller than a gnat's feces. ***** and let
the people who aren't complete and utter fools debate issues of which you
know nothign more than what your mis0handlers have spoon-fed you, you
ignorant fuckwit.
I know you never actually managed to think of that which makes you as
stupid as dan.
Kettle/pot.
Bush is a moron, and you are even more of a moron for buying into the
'official' reasons for this so called war. Oh wait, pardon me, now we
are
calling it 'The Struggle Against Extremeism' or some other *****. I
guess when nobody wants to join the military anymore it calls for
desperate
measures.
You're again proving your stupidity. I never bought the WMD theory and
have repeatedly said so. I know too much about nerve agents' capabilities
and limitations. They're lousy battlefield weapons. Troops carry
protective suits which will defeat their danger and even a mental midget
can figure out their limitations as a terrorist weapon. Nerve agents are
liquids, not gases. The tip off was the AUM attack on the Tokyo subway
system. They dropped containers of Sarin in four different places and
killed 12 people. Because it's a liquid stupid. It's heavier than air. And
one has to come in physical contact with the stuff to kill. In very rare
circumstances MAYBE the fumes will kill but mostly they'll just make one
sick, not dead.
Don't worry though, even if there is a draft, I'm sure you'll get a wart
on
your ***** or some other medical excuse to get out of it. That is the
conservative way afterall, just ask 99% of the Bush Administration.
Again you're being an *****. I was drafted in 1967 moron. Only morons
speak about that of which they know nothing.
You're just another ignorant ***** rat.
You're judt a brianwashed dolt who can neither back up claims of Hussein's
danger to the world any time in the last decade, nor find your own ***** with
both hands (probably cause your head is shoved so far up it). *****
dimwit and let the people who actually know something debate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "swayser" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
31 Jul 2005 01:55:57 PM |
|
|
wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:DDYGe.6708$6%2.386@fe10.lga...
Oilers wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:5YWGe.7019$_R1.3946@fe11.lga...
wrote:
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vkUGe.6351$_R1.6191@fe11.lga...
Harry Hope wrote:
The Cambodian genocide of 1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7
million
people lost their lives (21% of the country's population), was one of
the
worst human tragedies of the last century. As in Nazi Germany, and
more
recently in East Timor, Guatemala, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, the Khmer
Rouge regime headed by Pol Pot combined extremist ideology with ethnic
animosity and a diabolical disregard for human life to produce
repression, misery, and murder on a massive scale.
But today Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter bashes America for detaining 500
enemies.
I basically agree with you but we shouldn't forget UN Resolution
A/res/55/2. This resolution forbids any nation from interfering with
the
internal affairs of another, something Bill Clinton totally ignore by
launching deadly air attacks on Serbia is support of the Muslim
terrorist
KLA.
And where does INVADING a nation that was no threat to us, in the
process
killing 10s of thousands of innocents, come into the picture? Oh, that's
right, Dubya can do no wrong, even when he does.
Hey stupid read the resolution. We took out an expansionist totalitarian
dictator more dangerous than Hitler. And search all you want there is NO
resolution prohibiting making war on such a power that endangers the
economies of every industrialized nation in the world, including ours.
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the war
more vigorously.
So ***** stupid. You're just an ignorant little jerk off rat.
You compare Saddam to Hitler and you call dan stupid? ***** you have to
be a
Republican, there is no other explanation.
Let's see you're one of these stupid people who think Hitler was a
credible threat and Hussein wasn't. Let's examine that, shall we. Nazi
Germany had no way to get at America. It took the might of the combined
British Royal Navy and air force and the American Navy and air force to
land 10 divisions, two of them airborne across 30 miles of the English
channel in Normandy. That entailed using over 4,000 ships, 6,000 landing
craft and 11,000 aircraft. That was against no naval opposition. The
Kreigsmarine didn't exist for any practical purpose and there wasn't a
single German aircraft that could even REACH America. So why don't you
explain to use how Hitler could have landed and supplied an invading force
over 3,000 miles of the turbulent Atlantic Ocean. Hell, he couldn't even
invade England when he had an overwhelmingly superior army. He also
couldn't threaten our economy. We supplied all our own oil at the time.
And we had the Atomic Bomb in 1945, and the means to deliver it, and
Hitler had neither.
Hussein on the other hand amply demonstrated his ambition to control
Persian Gulf oil. Iraq is the third largest oil producer 10%. In 1980 he
attacked Iran #4 9% and ten years later #2 12%. Maybe you need a road map
to find your face, very few others do. Had Hussein attained hegemony over
the Persian gulf he would have had the industrialized nations by their
throats.
What had he done, other than shooting at our planes, since the Gulf War? You
fucking retard, your brain is smaller than a gnat's feces. ***** and let
the people who aren't complete and utter fools debate issues of which you
know nothign more than what your mis0handlers have spoon-fed you, you
ignorant fuckwit.
I know you never actually managed to think of that which makes you as
stupid as dan.
Kettle/pot.
Bush is a moron, and you are even more of a moron for buying into the
'official' reasons for this so called war. Oh wait, pardon me, now we
are
calling it 'The Struggle Against Extremeism' or some other *****. I
guess when nobody wants to join the military anymore it calls for
desperate
measures.
You're again proving your stupidity. I never bought the WMD theory and
have repeatedly said so. I know too much about nerve agents' capabilities
and limitations. They're lousy battlefield weapons. Troops carry
protective suits which will defeat their danger and even a mental midget
can figure out their limitations as a terrorist weapon. Nerve agents are
liquids, not gases. The tip off was the AUM attack on the Tokyo subway
system. They dropped containers of Sarin in four different places and
killed 12 people. Because it's a liquid stupid. It's heavier than air. And
one has to come in physical contact with the stuff to kill. In very rare
circumstances MAYBE the fumes will kill but mostly they'll just make one
sick, not dead.
Don't worry though, even if there is a draft, I'm sure you'll get a wart
on
your ***** or some other medical excuse to get out of it. That is the
conservative way afterall, just ask 99% of the Bush Administration.
Again you're being an *****. I was drafted in 1967 moron. Only morons
speak about that of which they know nothing.
You're just another ignorant ***** rat.
You're judt a brianwashed dolt who can neither back up claims of Hussein's
danger to the world any time in the last decade, nor find your own ***** with
both hands (probably cause your head is shoved so far up it). *****
dimwit and let the people who actually know something debate.
I see nitwit. He INVADED Iran, the third largest oil producer and Kuwait
the second largest producer in the Persian Gulf. Even a complete moron
can see what he's trying to do. Are you so pathetically uninformed you
never heard of the Carter Doctrine? Look it up moron. And of course you
don't actually contest any of my points, probably because you can't. No,
definitely because you can't. You rats are so ignorant of history you
probably think of "Independence Day" is history. You don't debate you
just dribble inanities.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cLIeNUX user" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 11:52:42 PM |
|
|
Jimmy Carter might make it onto US currency someday, which Johnson, Nixon,
Clinton, Ford, Bush and Bush won't.
--
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee Party of one.
write-in candidate, President of the United States of America
platform ftp://linux01.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim/platform2
personal webpage http://linux01.gwdg.de/~rhohen
active in Usenet alt.politics colorg on IRC
humbubba@smart.net Maryland, USA
Ground troops out of Iraq Put the CIA under INS Save Darfur
Semi-legalize drugs Prosecute Bush Tighten the borders
Isolate Israel Tax churches halve military aquisitions
government jobs for Iraq-wounded soldiers and 9-11 survivors
please email my platform to friends, blogs and countrymen
-------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "swayser" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
31 Jul 2005 02:20:40 PM |
|
|
cLIeNUX user wrote:
Jimmy Carter might make it onto US currency someday, which Johnson, Nixon,
Clinton, Ford, Bush and Bush won't.
I can conceive of no possible reason why he should. Don't you remember
Operation Eagle Claw
http://www.specwarnet.com/miscinfo/eagleclaw.htm
Operation Eagle Claw
Which was provoked by Carter allowing the Shah of Iran into this country
for medical treatment which he could easily have obtained elsewhere.
Okay, admittedly we have the best but it was still kinda dumb.
And his policy of favoring Communist insurgencies in Central and South
America? And, on a lighter note, his narrow escape from one of the
dreaded "Killer Rabbits"
http://www.newsoftheodd.com/article1021.html
Today in Odd History: Jimmy Carter Attacked by Killer Rabbit (April 20,
1979)
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a4_019.html
The Straight Dope: What was the deal with Jimmy Carter and the killer
rabbit?
I, personally, have never encounter one of these lethal beasts, and I've
spent a LOT of time hunting and camping.
Even his Carter Doctrine wasn't formulated by Carter. It was produced by
Zbigniew Brezinski, Carters National Security Advisor. And that was
incomplete because it stated that an attempt to gain control of Persian
Gulf oil by an "outside" power should be resisted by force if necessary.
This was produced during the Soviet's attempt to bring Afghanistan into
their "sphere of influence". Clearly it didn't go far enough. Free
access to the Gulf's oil is essential to every industrialized nation in
the world and it doesn't make a damn bit of which country was attempting it.
That was obvious with Saddam Hussein's attempt and now Iran's emerging
nuclear threat may soon have to be dealt with.
Carter MAY make it onto US currency. Maybe we should produce something
like Britain's half pence with a reverse relief of Carter as heads and
the other side a depiction of Carter in a canoe being attacked by a
simply infuriated Bugs Bunny. :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Cox" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 10:41:54 PM |
|
|
"swayser" <swayser@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:5YWGe.7019$_R1.3946@fe11.lga...
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45 minutes. Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he finally does get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
Randy R. Cox
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bishop The" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 11:00:15 PM |
|
|
On 30-Jul-2005, "Randy Cox" <randd49@airmail.net> wrote:
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45 minutes. Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he finally does get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
The "peanut gallery" speaks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
30 Jul 2005 11:47:02 PM |
|
|
"Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com> wrote in message
news:j1YGe.43645$zY4.40350@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
On 30-Jul-2005, "Randy Cox" <randd49@airmail.net> wrote:
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the
war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45 minutes.
Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he finally does
get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
The "peanut gallery" speaks.
Third-person self-referential comments are allowed, but not encouraged, as
they add nothing to the debate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bishop The" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
31 Jul 2005 09:40:25 AM |
|
|
On 31-Jul-2005, <dan@dan.com> wrote:
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the
war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45 minutes.
Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he finally does
get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
The "peanut gallery" speaks.
Third-person self-referential comments are allowed, but not encouraged, as
they add nothing to the debate.
More lib whining and complaining. Even about the stupidest thnigs. Run out
of usual left-looney barbs, we now resort to timing and second guessing
someone's thoughts in a 7 minute span. Amazing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Cox" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
31 Jul 2005 05:29:01 PM |
|
|
"Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com> wrote in message
news:tp5He.43671$zY4.14605@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
On 31-Jul-2005, <dan@dan.com> wrote:
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute the
war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45 minutes.
Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to
children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he finally
does
get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
The "peanut gallery" speaks.
Third-person self-referential comments are allowed, but not encouraged,
as
they add nothing to the debate.
More lib whining and complaining. Even about the stupidest thnigs. Run out
of usual left-looney barbs, we now resort to timing and second guessing
someone's thoughts in a 7 minute span. Amazing.
You delude yourself if you think we focus only on 7 minutes. Before that
while intelligence memo waited in Washington for him to read that might have
alerted those in charge that terrorists were learning to fly airliners but
not bothering to learn to land them. With your head in the sand, you can't
see that a full time president might have averted 9-11. Instead, the part
timer was on vacation in Crawford.
Just shows how selective your application of time is. The 45 minute threat
from Saddam (which was an absolute lie) was repeated a thousand times.
Mushroom clouds were referred to! It was all bogus. The seven minute delay
is on tape for all to see.
It wouldn't matter what kind of evidence you had of Bush's incompetence,
whether it be process or result, you and your kind would explain it away
with some illogical explanation that only worked for you because you were so
willing to revise reality.
Seven minutes of eye blinking after being informed of an attack against New
York is only acceptable to the mindwashed. Look at the response in New
York......almost instantaneous. Look at the response of those in
Washington.......almost instantaneous. Then look at seven minutes of
leadership from the top.
Look at the incompetence of leadership in the planning of Post invasion
Iraq. Remember the 100,000 trained Iraqis Bush bragged about last year only
to have the new leader of Iraq change the numbers. We still don't have that
many trained. If you guys were as good at planning as you are lying and
making excuses. We would be winning over there right now, instead of
planning a retreat.
Randy R. Cox
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wayne H. Wilhelm" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
01 Aug 2005 01:55:01 PM |
|
|
"Randy Cox" <randd49@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:11eqk608mnl9lc5@corp.supernews.com...
"Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com> wrote in message
news:tp5He.43671$zY4.14605@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
On 31-Jul-2005, <dan@dan.com> wrote:
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute
the
war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45 minutes.
Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to
children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he finally
does
get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
The "peanut gallery" speaks.
Third-person self-referential comments are allowed, but not encouraged,
as
they add nothing to the debate.
More lib whining and complaining. Even about the stupidest thnigs. Run
out
of usual left-looney barbs, we now resort to timing and second guessing
someone's thoughts in a 7 minute span. Amazing.
You delude yourself if you think we focus only on 7 minutes. Before that
while intelligence memo waited in Washington for him to read that might
have alerted those in charge that terrorists were learning to fly
airliners but not bothering to learn to land them. With your head in the
sand, you can't see that a full time president might have averted 9-11.
Instead, the part timer was on vacation in Crawford.
Just shows how selective your application of time is. The 45 minute
threat from Saddam (which was an absolute lie) was repeated a thousand
times. Mushroom clouds were referred to! It was all bogus. The seven
minute delay is on tape for all to see.
It wouldn't matter what kind of evidence you had of Bush's incompetence,
whether it be process or result, you and your kind would explain it away
with some illogical explanation that only worked for you because you were
so willing to revise reality.
Seven minutes of eye blinking after being informed of an attack against
New York is only acceptable to the mindwashed. Look at the response in
New York......almost instantaneous. Look at the response of those in
Washington.......almost instantaneous. Then look at seven minutes of
leadership from the top.
Look at the incompetence of leadership in the planning of Post invasion
Iraq. Remember the 100,000 trained Iraqis Bush bragged about last year
only to have the new leader of Iraq change the numbers. We still don't
have that many trained. If you guys were as good at planning as you are
lying and making excuses. We would be winning over there right now,
instead of planning a retreat.
Randy R. Cox
If Bush had immediately stopped everything he was doing in that now infamous
classroom, how could the results of 9/11 been changed?
As to the war in Iraq, we aren't planning to retreat. The only ones
demanding a retreat are the liberals.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
01 Aug 2005 02:13:53 PM |
|
|
"Wayne H. Wilhelm" <minewwilhelm@neo.rr.com> wrote in message
news:9euHe.42444$yC5.5490@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
"Randy Cox" <randd49@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:11eqk608mnl9lc5@corp.supernews.com...
"Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com> wrote in message
news:tp5He.43671$zY4.14605@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
On 31-Jul-2005, <dan@dan.com> wrote:
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute
the
war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45
minutes.
Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to
children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he finally
does
get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
The "peanut gallery" speaks.
Third-person self-referential comments are allowed, but not encouraged,
as
they add nothing to the debate.
More lib whining and complaining. Even about the stupidest thnigs. Run
out
of usual left-looney barbs, we now resort to timing and second guessing
someone's thoughts in a 7 minute span. Amazing.
You delude yourself if you think we focus only on 7 minutes. Before that
while intelligence memo waited in Washington for him to read that might
have alerted those in charge that terrorists were learning to fly
airliners but not bothering to learn to land them. With your head in the
sand, you can't see that a full time president might have averted 9-11.
Instead, the part timer was on vacation in Crawford.
Just shows how selective your application of time is. The 45 minute
threat from Saddam (which was an absolute lie) was repeated a thousand
times. Mushroom clouds were referred to! It was all bogus. The seven
minute delay is on tape for all to see.
It wouldn't matter what kind of evidence you had of Bush's incompetence,
whether it be process or result, you and your kind would explain it away
with some illogical explanation that only worked for you because you were
so willing to revise reality.
Seven minutes of eye blinking after being informed of an attack against
New York is only acceptable to the mindwashed. Look at the response in
New York......almost instantaneous. Look at the response of those in
Washington.......almost instantaneous. Then look at seven minutes of
leadership from the top.
Look at the incompetence of leadership in the planning of Post invasion
Iraq. Remember the 100,000 trained Iraqis Bush bragged about last year
only to have the new leader of Iraq change the numbers. We still don't
have that many trained. If you guys were as good at planning as you are
lying and making excuses. We would be winning over there right now,
instead of planning a retreat.
Randy R. Cox
If Bush had immediately stopped everything he was doing in that now
infamous classroom, how could the results of 9/11 been changed?
We'll never know now, will we? Still stuck on those 7 minutes, I see.
lol
The following are all uncontroversial facts reported in the mainstream
media:
On or about Jan. 20th, 2001, as the Clinton administration transitioned
to the Bush, NSC chief Sandy Berger briefed Condi Rice extensively on the
terrorism threat posed by bin Laden, telling her she would be spending
more time on this threat than she ever imagined. At the Dept. of Defense,
William Cohen was performing the same courtesy for Don Rumsfeld, again
with a sharp reminder of the terrorist threat in the form of a hand-written
letter to Rumsfeld containing the phone numbers of people in the Pentagon
Rumsfeld needed to speak to directly on the subject. On Jan. 26th, the CIA
confirmed to the new Bush administration that bin Laden and Al Qaeda were
responsible for the attack on the U.S.S. Cole which killed 17 American
sailors.
The response of the Bush administration was to cease Predator drone
surveillance flights to track bin Laden, reassign the cruise-missile
equipped submarine stationed in the Indian Ocean with the specific mission
of targeting bin Laden, reassign the AC-130 gunships on scramble alert that
could be on top of bin Laden after a six hour flight, suspend the special
forces operations targeting bin Laden already based in Uzbekistan for the
purpose thanks to a treaty signed by Bill Clinton.
In May, June and July, the sole remaining Clinton appointee, CIA Director
Tenet, was frantic with concern over incoming intelligence indicating a huge
terrorist attack on American soil. Vice-President ***** Cheney was head
of a
new counter-terrorism task force, yet held no meetings. Attorney General
John Ashcroft refused FBI requests for hundreds of new agents to be assigned
to counter-terrorism; his concerns were drugs and pornography, yet in late
July he stopped flying commercial airliners due to a "threat assessment."
The general threat assessment was considered to be the most severe in
decades
according to CIA's Tenet; members of the Senate Intelligence Committee were
briefed on the situation on July 5th.
Also in July, an Arizona FBI agent wrote the 'Phoenix Memo,' expressing
concern about possible Al Qaeda members taking flying lessons in this
country towards the end of terrorist attacks. One of the two FBI officials
to see it before the attacks was New York counter-terrorism chief John
O'Neill; contemporaneous with the timing of this memo was O'Neill's remarks
to the authors of 'Bin Laden: The Hidden Truth,' wherein O'Neill expressed
his outrage with the Bush administration's thwarting of counter-terrorist
efforts in the interests of protecting its Saudi sponsors. John O'Neill
would soon quit the FBI in disgust, only to die at his new job as chief of
security at the WTC.
Also in July, the FAA rescinded the rule allowing airline pilots to be
armed,
a rule that had been in force since 1961.
August found George W. Bush 'vacationing' for the entire month in rural
Texas, while ***** Cheney similarly spent the month in rural Wyoming. On
August 1st actor James Woods as flying from Logan to Los Angeles, sharing
1st class with four Middle Eastern men, who ate nothing, drank nothing,
read nothing, nor slept the entire flight, only making occasional low
comments to one another. Woods remarked to the flight attendant that 'These
guys act like they're going to hijack the plane,' and once the plane landed
he repeated his concerns to the FAA. All four men were hijackers on Sept.
11th. On Aug. 6th, Bush himself was apparently finally briefed about the
specific threat of attacks on American soil. His vacation continued. On Aug.
17th, the Minneapolis FBI office arrested Zacarias Moussaoui, on the basis
of an expired student visa and very curious pilot training requests. FBI
field agents at this office were convinced of Moussaoui's intentions as a
terrorist, and repeatedly tried to obtain a FISA (Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act) warrant to search his computer. In early Sept., French
Intelligence informed both the CIA and the FBI that Moussaoui had Al Qaeda
connections. A FISA warrant remained ungranted against Moussaoui, even
though under Clinton and Janet Reno no FISA request had been refused.
As an interesting aside, before 9/11 Ashcroft was known to put in 3 1/2 day
work weeks at the Dept. of Justice. In the early months of the
administration,
FBI agents flew to Ashcroft's home in rural Missouri to obtain his signature
on a wire-tap for a terrorism investigation. Ashcroft was so displeased to
see the agents, he had them stand out in the cold while he sat in his pickup
to read and sign the documents.
On Sept. 4th, Cheney's counter-terrorism task force met for the first time.
According to the Pentagon's liaison for terrorism, Gen. Kerrik, Clinton's
had met almost weekly, but with Bush he "didn't see that same kind of
focus."
On Sept. 10, Diane Feinstein, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee
briefed on July 5th, asked ***** Cheney's chief of staff Scooter Libby when
the administration would start focusing on these terror threats which had
so pre-occupied CIA's Tenet, the most severe in decades - she was told it
would have to wait another six months.
So, obviously, it's all Clinton's fault.
Pre-9/11 And The Bush Administration. It's All Clinton's Fault, Right?
by Kent Southard
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wayne H. Wilhelm" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
01 Aug 2005 07:32:35 PM |
|
|
Added to post at end...
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@itg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:dcls9i$8nm$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"Wayne H. Wilhelm" <minewwilhelm@neo.rr.com> wrote in message
news:9euHe.42444$yC5.5490@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
"Randy Cox" <randd49@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:11eqk608mnl9lc5@corp.supernews.com...
"Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com> wrote in message
news:tp5He.43671$zY4.14605@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
On 31-Jul-2005, <dan@dan.com> wrote:
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute
the
war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45
minutes.
Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to
children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he finally
does
get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
The "peanut gallery" speaks.
Third-person self-referential comments are allowed, but not
encouraged, as
they add nothing to the debate.
More lib whining and complaining. Even about the stupidest thnigs. Run
out
of usual left-looney barbs, we now resort to timing and second guessing
someone's thoughts in a 7 minute span. Amazing.
You delude yourself if you think we focus only on 7 minutes. Before
that while intelligence memo waited in Washington for him to read that
might have alerted those in charge that terrorists were learning to fly
airliners but not bothering to learn to land them. With your head in
the sand, you can't see that a full time president might have averted
9-11. Instead, the part timer was on vacation in Crawford.
Just shows how selective your application of time is. The 45 minute
threat from Saddam (which was an absolute lie) was repeated a thousand
times. Mushroom clouds were referred to! It was all bogus. The seven
minute delay is on tape for all to see.
It wouldn't matter what kind of evidence you had of Bush's incompetence,
whether it be process or result, you and your kind would explain it away
with some illogical explanation that only worked for you because you
were so willing to revise reality.
Seven minutes of eye blinking after being informed of an attack against
New York is only acceptable to the mindwashed. Look at the response in
New York......almost instantaneous. Look at the response of those in
Washington.......almost instantaneous. Then look at seven minutes of
leadership from the top.
Look at the incompetence of leadership in the planning of Post invasion
Iraq. Remember the 100,000 trained Iraqis Bush bragged about last year
only to have the new leader of Iraq change the numbers. We still don't
have that many trained. If you guys were as good at planning as you are
lying and making excuses. We would be winning over there right now,
instead of planning a retreat.
Randy R. Cox
If Bush had immediately stopped everything he was doing in that now
infamous classroom, how could the results of 9/11 been changed?
We'll never know now, will we? Still stuck on those 7 minutes, I see.
lol
The following are all uncontroversial facts reported in the mainstream
media:
On or about Jan. 20th, 2001, as the Clinton administration transitioned
to the Bush, NSC chief Sandy Berger briefed Condi Rice extensively on the
terrorism threat posed by bin Laden, telling her she would be spending
more time on this threat than she ever imagined. At the Dept. of Defense,
William Cohen was performing the same courtesy for Don Rumsfeld, again
with a sharp reminder of the terrorist threat in the form of a
hand-written
letter to Rumsfeld containing the phone numbers of people in the Pentagon
Rumsfeld needed to speak to directly on the subject. On Jan. 26th, the CIA
confirmed to the new Bush administration that bin Laden and Al Qaeda were
responsible for the attack on the U.S.S. Cole which killed 17 American
sailors.
The response of the Bush administration was to cease Predator drone
surveillance flights to track bin Laden, reassign the cruise-missile
equipped submarine stationed in the Indian Ocean with the specific mission
of targeting bin Laden, reassign the AC-130 gunships on scramble alert
that
could be on top of bin Laden after a six hour flight, suspend the special
forces operations targeting bin Laden already based in Uzbekistan for the
purpose thanks to a treaty signed by Bill Clinton.
In May, June and July, the sole remaining Clinton appointee, CIA Director
Tenet, was frantic with concern over incoming intelligence indicating a
huge
terrorist attack on American soil. Vice-President ***** Cheney was head
of a
new counter-terrorism task force, yet held no meetings. Attorney General
John Ashcroft refused FBI requests for hundreds of new agents to be
assigned
to counter-terrorism; his concerns were drugs and pornography, yet in late
July he stopped flying commercial airliners due to a "threat assessment."
The general threat assessment was considered to be the most severe in
decades
according to CIA's Tenet; members of the Senate Intelligence Committee
were
briefed on the situation on July 5th.
Also in July, an Arizona FBI agent wrote the 'Phoenix Memo,' expressing
concern about possible Al Qaeda members taking flying lessons in this
country towards the end of terrorist attacks. One of the two FBI officials
to see it before the attacks was New York counter-terrorism chief John
O'Neill; contemporaneous with the timing of this memo was O'Neill's
remarks
to the authors of 'Bin Laden: The Hidden Truth,' wherein O'Neill expressed
his outrage with the Bush administration's thwarting of counter-terrorist
efforts in the interests of protecting its Saudi sponsors. John O'Neill
would soon quit the FBI in disgust, only to die at his new job as chief of
security at the WTC.
Also in July, the FAA rescinded the rule allowing airline pilots to be
armed,
a rule that had been in force since 1961.
August found George W. Bush 'vacationing' for the entire month in rural
Texas, while ***** Cheney similarly spent the month in rural Wyoming. On
August 1st actor James Woods as flying from Logan to Los Angeles, sharing
1st class with four Middle Eastern men, who ate nothing, drank nothing,
read nothing, nor slept the entire flight, only making occasional low
comments to one another. Woods remarked to the flight attendant that
'These
guys act like they're going to hijack the plane,' and once the plane
landed
he repeated his concerns to the FAA. All four men were hijackers on Sept.
11th. On Aug. 6th, Bush himself was apparently finally briefed about the
specific threat of attacks on American soil. His vacation continued. On
Aug.
17th, the Minneapolis FBI office arrested Zacarias Moussaoui, on the basis
of an expired student visa and very curious pilot training requests. FBI
field agents at this office were convinced of Moussaoui's intentions as a
terrorist, and repeatedly tried to obtain a FISA (Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act) warrant to search his computer. In early Sept., French
Intelligence informed both the CIA and the FBI that Moussaoui had Al Qaeda
connections. A FISA warrant remained ungranted against Moussaoui, even
though under Clinton and Janet Reno no FISA request had been refused.
As an interesting aside, before 9/11 Ashcroft was known to put in 3 1/2
day
work weeks at the Dept. of Justice. In the early months of the
administration,
FBI agents flew to Ashcroft's home in rural Missouri to obtain his
signature
on a wire-tap for a terrorism investigation. Ashcroft was so displeased to
see the agents, he had them stand out in the cold while he sat in his
pickup
to read and sign the documents.
On Sept. 4th, Cheney's counter-terrorism task force met for the first
time.
According to the Pentagon's liaison for terrorism, Gen. Kerrik, Clinton's
had met almost weekly, but with Bush he "didn't see that same kind of
focus."
On Sept. 10, Diane Feinstein, a member of the Senate Intelligence
Committee
briefed on July 5th, asked ***** Cheney's chief of staff Scooter Libby when
the administration would start focusing on these terror threats which had
so pre-occupied CIA's Tenet, the most severe in decades - she was told it
would have to wait another six months.
So, obviously, it's all Clinton's fault.
Pre-9/11 And The Bush Administration. It's All Clinton's Fault, Right?
by Kent Southard
Ah, you mentioned Sandy Berger. That's an interesting choice to use to
present your case.
If Bill Clinton didn't do something wrong, then why did he send Sandy Berger
on a mission to remove and destroy classified documents. Sandy Berger pled
guilty to having done so and the media had already published the fact the
Bill Clinton had sent Berger on the mission. Now, the 9/11 investigation
commission stated the destroyed documents weren't relevant to the case? And
as we now know, all Berger received was a slap on the wrist, temporary loss
of his security classification with the promise to be a good boy in the
future.
Here we have liberals who throw a major temper tantrum claiming Rove
revealed Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, yet claim Clinton sending Berger
on a mission to destroy classified documents is a minor issue.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bishop The" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
01 Aug 2005 06:27:46 PM |
|
|
On 1-Aug-2005, "Wayne H. Wilhelm" <minewwilhelm@neo.rr.com> wrote:
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute
the
war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45 minutes.
Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to
children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he finally
does
get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
The "peanut gallery" speaks.
Third-person self-referential comments are allowed, but not encouraged,
as
they add nothing to the debate.
More lib whining and complaining. Even about the stupidest thnigs. Run
out
of usual left-looney barbs, we now resort to timing and second guessing
someone's thoughts in a 7 minute span. Amazing.
You delude yourself if you think we focus only on 7 minutes. Before that
while intelligence memo waited in Washington for him to read that might
have alerted those in charge that terrorists were learning to fly
airliners but not bothering to learn to land them. With your head in the
sand, you can't see that a full time president might have averted 9-11.
Instead, the part timer was on vacation in Crawford.
Just shows how selective your application of time is. The 45 minute
threat from Saddam (which was an absolute lie) was repeated a thousand
times. Mushroom clouds were referred to! It was all bogus. The seven
minute delay is on tape for all to see.
It wouldn't matter what kind of evidence you had of Bush's incompetence,
whether it be process or result, you and your kind would explain it away
with some illogical explanation that only worked for you because you were
so willing to revise reality.
Seven minutes of eye blinking after being informed of an attack against
New York is only acceptable to the mindwashed. Look at the response in
New York......almost instantaneous. Look at the response of those in
Washington.......almost instantaneous. Then look at seven minutes of
leadership from the top.
Look at the incompetence of leadership in the planning of Post invasion
Iraq. Remember the 100,000 trained Iraqis Bush bragged about last year
only to have the new leader of Iraq change the numbers. We still don't
have that many trained. If you guys were as good at planning as you are
lying and making excuses. We would be winning over there right now,
instead of planning a retreat.
Randy R. Cox
If Bush had immediately stopped everything he was doing in that now infamous
classroom, how could the results of 9/11 been changed?
As to the war in Iraq, we aren't planning to retreat. The only ones
demanding a retreat are the liberals.
Funny how that works with lib-loons. They protest the war but ***** about
7 minutes. LOL!!! Then, if he would have jumped in 5 seconds, they would
have bitched and moaned about not taking time to "think through" the
situation. They're like a bunch of bitches on their period. Like a bunch of
damn women cackling.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wayne H. Wilhelm" |
|
| Title: Re: Jimmy Carter, gutless scum |
01 Aug 2005 07:40:36 PM |
|
|
"Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com> wrote in message
news:SdyHe.42484$yC5.40178@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
On 1-Aug-2005, "Wayne H. Wilhelm" <minewwilhelm@neo.rr.com> wrote:
The only mistake President Bush has made is to fail to prosecute
the
war
more vigorously.
President Bush told us Saddam could attack us with WMD in 45
minutes.
Bush
was told America was under attack while reading goat stories to
children.
He waited 7 minutes before he responded to the "attack".
It doesn't add up to a presidential response!
For a president so slow to respond, it follows that when he
finally
does
get
around to doing something, it would be something inappropriate.
The "peanut gallery" speaks.
Third-person self-referential comments are allowed, but not
encouraged,
as
they add nothing to the debate.
More lib whining and complaining. Even about the stupidest thnigs. Run
out
of usual left-looney barbs, we now resort to timing and second
guessing
someone's thoughts in a 7 minute span. Amazing.
You delude yourself if you think we focus only on 7 minutes. Before
that
while intelligence memo waited in Washington for him to read that might
have alerted those in charge that terrorists were learning to fly
airliners but not bothering to learn to land them. With your head in
the
sand, you can't see that a full time president might have averted 9-11.
Instead, the part timer was on vacation in Crawford.
Just shows how selective your application of time is. The 45 minute
threat from Saddam (which was an absolute lie) was repeated a thousand
times. Mushroom clouds were referred to! It was all bogus. The seven
minute delay is on tape for all to see.
It wouldn't matter what kind of evidence you had of Bush's
incompetence,
whether it be process or result, you and your kind would explain it
away
with some illogical explanation that only worked for you because you
were
so willing to revise reality.
Seven minutes of eye blinking after being informed of an attack against
New York is only acceptable to the mindwashed. Look at the response
in
New Y | | | | | | | | | | | |