KERRY'S UNEMPLOYMENT HYPOCRISY AND TERESA
Yesterday, May 7, 2004, the Department of Labor's Non Farm
payroll reports revealed that we (the USA) gained 288 thousand
jobs last month alone. In fact, our economy is growing so rapidly
that we have gained 1.5 million jobs in just the past eight
months, and even our production levels have remained high during
this same period! Economists will tell you that a high job growth
rate coupled with a high productivity rate is unprecedented and
means our (the American) economy is accelerating faster that
anyone could have predicted. As of this day, the American economy
is growing faster than any other democratic free market nation in
the world.
Most economists, and especially the Federal Reserve board, relate
our accelerating economy to President Bush's tax cut stimulus
(which Hanoi John Kerry opposed of course).
But the real rub is not just that Kerry opposed the very tax cut
stimulus that has resulted in 1.5 million jobs created for
America and helped our accelerating economy, the really flagrant
Kerry hypocrisy exists in our present 5.6% unemployment rate:
Our unemployment rate fell yesterday to 5.6%, and that rate is a
very historically significant number. Why is the 5.6% figure so
important? Because Hanoi John Kerry and the rest of the Democrats
during the Clinton vs. Gore election not only said that precise
unemployment rate was acceptable, many Democrats including Kerry
said that rate was "outstanding" and "that President Clinton
should be reelected based upon such a low rate of unemployment!"
Yes, you read it right. When President Clinton was running for
reelection against Senator Dole, the unemployment rate at that
time under Clinton was precisely where it is today . . . 5.6%.
But back then the Democrats like Kerry hailed that low 5.6%
unemployment rate as "outstanding" and "excellent low rate" and
congratulated President Clinton on achieving that low rate. But,
strange as it may sound, the Democrats are now claiming that
exact same rate of 5.6% is "unacceptable" "terrible" "worse than
Herbert Hoover" - and the most hypocritical of the Democrats are
Hanoi John Kerry and Hillary Clinton!
It seems that Hillary and Hanoi John just love a 5.6%
unemployment rate when that rate is related to a Democratic
President, but they absolutely loath that same precise rate when
it is associated with a Republican President! Go figure.
This is just one more example of how the Kerry camp is trying to
deceive the American people. The double-dealing and HYPOCRISY of
the Kerry camp are so incredibly obvious I believe it is harming
the Democratic party as a whole. Were the Dems nuts in nominating
such a clear and unmistakable liar and traitor like Hanoi John
Kerry? I believe they have made a terrible mistake, and any one
of the other Democratic candidates would have been a better
choice over Kerry. (I like Lieberman and Gephardt).
Hell, I believe that if the Democrats had randomly chosen an
inmate from a Federal Maximum prison as their candidate that
convict would also have been a better choice than Hanoi John
Kerry! But then we all know I don't like the man mostly because
he is a traitor, liar and a hypocrite, so perhaps I am a bit
prejudiced against him. But I doubt it. I think Kerry more than
deserves all that is being said about him and his past . . .
provided of course it is the truth. (I always post the truth
based upon my research, and if anyone can refute anything I have
posted with specificity I invite them to do so, as no one is
perfect, not even me).
Teresa Heinz
Moreover, if you are a Kerry supporter you do not want to know
what Kerry's wife is saying. That candidate for "First Lady" is a
very outspoken woman, and according to her statements, she does
not like the USA very much and would prefer not to live here. And
that information about Mrs. Kerry is mild compared to what else
she is saying. Stay tuned, Ms. Heinz, er "Kerry" will also turn
out to be a big problem for the Democratic party before this
election is over. (You heard it here first).
Although with that said, Ms. Heinz is not running for office, and
she sure as hell is entitled to her "opinion" on anything...even
if those opinions seem to harm John Kerry's chances to become our
next President. (Thank you Teresa).
So speak out Mrs. Heinz, er, Kerry (she likes to be called Mrs.
Heinz) we are listening...Also the American public deserves to
see your tax returns Mrs. Heinz, especially because Mr. Kerry
(your "other" husband) used money from a Townhouse mortgage that
he claimed was worth much more than it was assessed for, and for
other reasons, such as to see to whom all those big charitable
contributions are going? I hope none of that money is going to
enemies of the USA or is somehow finding its way back into the
Kerry campaign or soft money groups like moveon.org? Naughty
naughty if that is what is going on as the Federal Campaign
Commission might disqualify John Kerry's entire candidacy if this
is the case.
If Laura Bush was refusing to reveal her tax returns the Press
would be having a field day. What is Ms. Heinz trying to hide
from the American people anyway? Revealing tax returns is not a
big deal if you have nothing to hide. We do not want to elect a
President with the possibility that his wife might be indicted
for tax fraud while he is in office, as that event would not be
good for the party nor for the American people.. So it is time to
reveal those tax returns Teresa and put all this suspicion to
rest. We all like Ketchup, no one will hold it against you for
being so rich. You married the man Teresa. Remember the "for
better or for worse" promise? Well, this is one of those "for
worses." Fess up Teresa, we all want to see everything!
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
