LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

Politics > Politics-USA > LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 2

Topic:	Politics > Politics-USA
User:	"ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL"
Date:	21 Oct 2005 09:16:56 PM
Object:	LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

THE LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
(and our nation)
President Lying Draft-Dodging Warmonger Bush
Vice President Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Cheney
Defense Secretary Draft-Dodging Incompetent Lying War-Criminal Rumsfeld
Secretary of State Incompetent Liar Rice
Deputy Defense Secretary Draft-Dodging Incompetent War-Criminal Wolfowitz
Deputy Chief of Staff Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Rove
Vice Presidential Chief of Staff Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Libby
Speaker of the House Heartless Draft-Dodger Hastert
Senate Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Insider-Trading Frist
Deposed House Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Money-Laundering DeLay
Deposed Senate Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Racist Lott
.

User: "XTS"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 09:43:07 PM

"ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL" <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote in message
news:impeach-us-1BC940.22165621102005@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

THE LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
(and our nation)

President Lying Draft-Dodging Warmonger Bush

Vice President Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Cheney

Defense Secretary Draft-Dodging Incompetent Lying War-Criminal Rumsfeld

Secretary of State Incompetent Liar Rice

Deputy Defense Secretary Draft-Dodging Incompetent War-Criminal Wolfowitz

Deputy Chief of Staff Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Rove

Vice Presidential Chief of Staff Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Libby

Speaker of the House Heartless Draft-Dodger Hastert

Senate Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Insider-Trading Frist

Deposed House Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Money-Laundering DeLay

Deposed Senate Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Racist Lott

Lock 'em, all up. This bunch of bums had a chance to help America, and
instead all they did was loot, get us attacked, start wars, get our kids
slaughtered and take us broke. These dirty SOB's dont deserve the name
American.
The news programs tonight were replete with the "non-story" of the CIAeak,
the illegal invasion of Iraq, the lies about Niger, the slandering of the
Wilsons, and the mug shots of TomDelay, the most pious criminal in our
land.
But, it's all a left wing conspiracy, and all the judges and prosecutors
are democrats..wa wa wa, hear them cry, whine and pis their panties.
Rove is goiing to Camp David with buh instead of making a speech. Cheney is
is hiding, Rice is at a football game, Libby is obsessed with Joe Wilson and
his lovely wife, and the country drifts aimlessly while our kidsa are
bening butchered and their commanders are planning their legal defensein
instead of how to keep our KIDS FROM DYING IN THE WAR BASED ON LIES!
This is the State of Our Union. We are in the hands of criminals, muderers,
conspirators, liars theives and scoundrels.
Right now, at Camp David, they are conspiring against WE THE PEOPLE! On two
news programs, they said Rove & Libby have been notified by the prosecutor
they are in criminla liabilty after Roves lawyers told the American people
Rove was not. More lies, more *****.
How much more do we have to sit by and watch as our SOLDIERS DIE FO THE LIE?
.

User: "Nosmo King"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	22 Oct 2005 12:36:58 PM

ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote in news:impeach-
us-1BC940.22165621102005@comcast.dca.giganews.com:

Defense Secretary Draft-Dodging Incompetent Lying War-Criminal Rumsfeld

I think Rummy was in the Navy in the fifties, or maybe the Marines.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.

User: "Foxtrot"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 09:50:21 PM

ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote:

Thanks to the precedent set by Slick Willie, nobody cares
about politicians' draft evasion.

Vice Presidential Chief of Staff Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Libby

Speaker of the House Heartless Draft-Dodger Hastert

Senate Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Insider-Trading Frist

Deposed House Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Money-Laundering DeLay

Deposed Senate Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Racist Lott

With all of Reps' problems, they still have far more power
and more public support than you worthless Dems. Your
party must really SUCK, eh? LOL
.

User: "XTS"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 10:08:04 PM

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in message
news:4u9jl1hkuefmo748fbtohvul1r8mf2jjrf@4ax.com...

ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote:

Thanks to the precedent set by Slick Willie, nobody cares
about politicians' draft evasion.

With all of Reps' problems, they still have far more power
and more public support than you worthless Dems. Your
party must really SUCK, eh? LOL

Tell us how the power structure of the GOP has landed them in this
situation? Tell us how, if they have that much power why their poll numbers
are at the bottom of the toilet. Tell us if bragging about their power is
worth having criminlsa run your country. If power comes in the form of Tom
Delays mug shots, Bill Frists investiagtion, Rove and Libby Cia leaks, tell
us how that is good for America, or is it just good for your ego and *****
America. Tell us why this is such a great thing?
.

User: "Ben Dover"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 10:20:44 PM

"XTS" <xts@Xwoh.rr.com> wrote in message

Tell us how the power structure of the GOP has landed them in this
situation? Tell us how, if they have that much power why their poll
numbers
are at the bottom of the toilet. Tell us if bragging about their power is
worth having criminals run your country. If power comes in the form of Tom
Delays mug shots, Bill Frists investiagtion, Rove and Libby Cia leaks,
tell
us how that is good for America, or is it just good for your ego and *****
America. Tell us why this is such a great thing?

Excellent analysis... Hey Foxtrot!!! Were waiting for a response....
<fingers tapping on the table while humming a joyful tune> LOL! ;)
.

User: "XTS"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 10:28:49 PM

"Ben Dover" <bendover@aol.com> wrote in message
news:gei6f.17544$vw6.5158@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...

"XTS" <xts@Xwoh.rr.com> wrote in message

worth having criminals run your country. If power comes in the form of

Tom

Delays mug shots, Bill Frists investiagtion, Rove and Libby Cia leaks,
tell
us how that is good for America, or is it just good for your ego and

*****

America. Tell us why this is such a great thing?

Excellent analysis... Hey Foxtrot!!! Were waiting for a response....
<fingers tapping on the table while humming a joyful tune> LOL! ;)

I'm waiting too. I want to know if this clown is a republican or an America.
If he puts the republican power in such high esteem, that American rots in
debt, and our soldiers are dying for a lie, then he has is not putting
America first, but the republicans and this power he braggs about. I want to
fuckin know godamnit.
.

User: "Foxtrot"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 10:29:02 PM

"XTS" <xts@Xwoh.rr.com> wrote:

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote

With all of Reps' problems, they still have far more power
and more public support than you worthless Dems. Your
party must really SUCK, eh? LOL

Reps certainly have their problems. Bush irritates me for a
variety of reasons. But they currently control the executive
branch, the legislative branch, and an increasing portion of
the judicial branch. It's all because they don't suck nearly
as bad as Dems. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Dems chose Screamin' Dean, a caustic *****, to lead
the party. Party leaders in the senate include a former
klansman and a man who left his girlfriend to drown while
he went to his hotel to sober up. And yet you still don't
understand why people aren't flocking to the Dem party?
.

User: "XTS"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 10:47:19 PM

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in message
news:gpbjl1pfp6s5tpi9mugmkpvmn1ltfhl7ha@4ax.com...

"XTS" <xts@Xwoh.rr.com> wrote:

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote

With all of Reps' problems, they still have far more power
and more public support than you worthless Dems. Your
party must really SUCK, eh? LOL

Tell us how the power structure of the GOP has landed them in this
situation? Tell us how, if they have that much power why their poll

numbers

are at the bottom of the toilet. Tell us if bragging about their power is
worth having criminlsa run your country. If power comes in the form of

Tom

Delays mug shots, Bill Frists investiagtion, Rove and Libby Cia leaks,

tell

us how that is good for America, or is it just good for your ego and *****
America. Tell us why this is such a great thing?

Because the dont suck as bad as democrats? That is stupid, and avoids
anything I asked you to address. I can only say, that you dont really love
America. If you think this pack of criminals and deficit spenders simply
dont suck, they, you are ignoring America.

Dems chose Screamin' Dean, a caustic *****, to lead
the party. Party leaders in the senate include a former
klansman and a man who left his girlfriend to drown while
he went to his hotel to sober up. And yet you still don't
understand why people aren't flocking to the Dem party?

The democrats had a lot of success long after the attempt on Ted Kennedy's
life. It was bad enough they killed his brothers, but he did mangae to
survive the attempt on his life.
I guess you are speaking of one democrat whop used to have ties to the KKK,
who only people who decide his fate are those in his state right? He's from
the south right? I think that clears that up.
As far as Dean goes, calling him a caustic ***** is akin to me calling
Limbaugh a dope addicted ***** who leads you folks around by your nose,
which is yoked to an AM Radio, waiting for him to tell you what to think, he
is the proxy leader of your right wing.
Now, I addressed you answer point by point, would you do the same, or are
you just going to stick with your astute political observation that
democrats suck. So far all I got from you was this pearl of wisdom:
"Reps certainly have their problems". OK. Problems? Get real, they are in
up to their necks. And, I still want to know how you think their power is
good for America, while we rot in debt and our kids die for nothing. You
addressed why the democrats suck, by citing Ted a racist and Dean, but
avoined the ABUSE of the power the republicans have.
.

User: "ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 10:36:05 PM

In article <gpbjl1pfp6s5tpi9mugmkpvmn1ltfhl7ha@4ax.com>,
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

Is that all ya got? Where's the treason? Where's the lying to start a war?
Where's the draft-dodging-then-starting-a-bumbling-unilateral-war?
Let me repeat...
President Lying Draft-Dodging Warmonger Bush
Vice President Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Cheney
Defense Secretary Draft-Dodging Incompetent Lying War-Criminal Rumsfeld
Secretary of State Incompetent Liar Rice
Deputy Defense Secretary Draft-Dodging Incompetent War-Criminal Wolfowitz
Deputy Chief of Staff Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Rove
Vice Presidential Chief of Staff Draft-Dodging Treasonous Liar Libby
Speaker of the House Heartless Draft-Dodger Hastert
Senate Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Insider-Trading Frist
Deposed House Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Money-Laundering DeLay
Deposed Senate Majority Leader Draft-Dodging Racist Lott
.

User: "Foxtrot"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 10:55:58 PM

ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote:

Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

Is that all ya got? Where's the treason? Where's the lying to start a war?
Where's the draft-dodging-then-starting-a-bumbling-unilateral-war?

You Bush haters were spewing that same crap before the
election last year. As a result, Bush got a higher percentage
of the vote in 2004 than he got in 2000. Keep it up! LOL
.

User: "EagleEye"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 11:15:22 PM

I'm sorry but just WHO THE ***** supports this Bush administration.
Please raise your hand and be counted.
This is about right and WRONG folks, not left vs. right.
How can anyone support these crims and call themselves an American?
No one, in good conscience, supports the Bush administration.
.

User: "ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 11:27:02 PM

In article <3fdjl15ieeuosi79cl0gr0o57602mu60v3@4ax.com>,
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

Is that all ya got? Where's the treason? Where's the lying to start a war?
Where's the draft-dodging-then-starting-a-bumbling-unilateral-war?

You Bush haters were spewing that same crap before the
election last year. As a result, Bush got a higher percentage
of the vote in 2004 than he got in 2000. Keep it up! LOL

So it's all about how many votes the Republicans could rig, steal, and buy?
Are you just completely unconcerned with the high crimes and misdemeanors
of this entire administration?
It doesn't matter how evil and bad for the country the Republicans are...
as long as they get re-elected, everything must be OK.
Money laundering.
Intelligence tampering to start an offensive war.
War crimes.
Treason.
These are the true faces of the Republican leadership, and you are
obviously powerless to deny it.
.

User: "XTS"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	21 Oct 2005 11:39:21 PM

"ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL" <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote in message
news:impeach-us-7DDEBE.00270222102005@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

In article <3fdjl15ieeuosi79cl0gr0o57602mu60v3@4ax.com>,
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

Is that all ya got? Where's the treason? Where's the lying to start a

war?

Where's the draft-dodging-then-starting-a-bumbling-unilateral-war?

You Bush haters were spewing that same crap before the
election last year. As a result, Bush got a higher percentage
of the vote in 2004 than he got in 2000. Keep it up! LOL

So it's all about how many votes the Republicans could rig, steal, and

buy?

Are you just completely unconcerned with the high crimes and misdemeanors
of this entire administration?

It doesn't matter how evil and bad for the country the Republicans are...
as long as they get re-elected, everything must be OK.

Money laundering.
Intelligence tampering to start an offensive war.
War crimes.
Treason.

These are the true faces of the Republican leadership, and you are
obviously powerless to deny it.

According to these guys, your laundry list of crimes is fine and dandy as
long as republicans do them. America, her children, her future, and her
well being are not on the same list of priorities of these bush people. They
obvioulsy hate America, and want a one party criminal administration to
rule. They don't care if it's a diitatorshit, a Nazi Party, or a right wing
fascist country under the iron fist of a totalitarian madman, as long as it
says republican somewhere on the stationary. They dont even care if this
madman is scrigicing their own children to serve his evil ends, they are
gladly allowing their children to go and die for bush. You seen what bthe
dummy wrote..."POWER" he's to dumb to realize how thats being abused, he
just lies the way it sounds, because democrats suck. Now, that's the bottom
of the barrel loyalty to a party isn;t it. Support crimes, murder, and a
criminal element, because in your opnion, the other party sucks. Man o
man...to think the America revolutionaries suffered and died to breed that
kind of apathy is sickening.
.

User: "Foxtrot"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	22 Oct 2005 02:16:01 AM

"XTS" <xts@Xwoh.rr.com> wrote:

"ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL" <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote

Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

You Bush haters were spewing that same crap before the
election last year. As a result, Bush got a higher percentage
of the vote in 2004 than he got in 2000. Keep it up! LOL

So it's all about how many votes the Republicans could rig, steal, and

buy?

Waaaaaaahh, booohooohooo! Mommy, we lost the election
so they must have stole it from us!
You left wing pukes are pathetic. Your problems are always
somebody else's fault, aren't they? You can never accept
the fact that YOU did something wrong, like when you
nominated ultraliberal kooks Al Grrrr and Jean Kerr�e as
your presidential candidates and drove voters to Bush.

Are you just completely unconcerned with the high crimes and misdemeanors
of this entire administration?

Imaginary.

It doesn't matter how evil and bad for the country the Republicans are...
as long as they get re-elected, everything must be OK.

Yes, those things do matter. But Dems are far worse. I keep
telling you that, but you're too dense to get it.

Money laundering.

Compared to BJ pardoning international fugitive Marc Rich
in exchange for $$$?

Intelligence tampering to start an offensive war.

The same intel that BJ and British lefty Tony Blair presented,
you dolt. Ketchup boy was on the Senate Intel Committee from
1993 to 2001 and he voted for the war. Care to explain?

War crimes.

None.

Treason.

If that's true, why aren't any powerful Dems in the Senate
making the case?

These are the true faces of the Republican leadership, and you are
obviously powerless to deny it.

You still can't grasp the concept of "lesser of two evils", eh?
Go ahead and throw around the tired old Nazi and totalitarian
allegations that you libs love to use so frivolously. But it won't
help you win any elections. American voters see Dems as a
bunch of tax-raising power-grubbing bureaucrats who are too
wimpy to stand up to terrorists. THAT is why you keep losing
elections.
.

User: "XTS"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	22 Oct 2005 02:21:38 AM

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in message
news:b4ojl1lpn25nrp2flj3oopj78l2qsim5bd@4ax.com...

"XTS" <xts@Xwoh.rr.com> wrote:

"ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL" <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote

Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

You Bush haters were spewing that same crap before the
election last year. As a result, Bush got a higher percentage
of the vote in 2004 than he got in 2000. Keep it up! LOL

So it's all about how many votes the Republicans could rig, steal, and

buy?

Waaaaaaahh, booohooohooo! Mommy, we lost the election
so they must have stole it from us!

You left wing pukes are pathetic. Your problems are always
somebody else's fault, aren't they?

No, that would be Tom Delay, the prosecutor is a liberal...the judge is a
democrat...pissingf and whining and maoning..and you say democrats, time to
eat your own ***** Delay lover. The hammer is a whiner rotfl!
You can never accept

the fact that YOU did something wrong, like when you
nominated ultraliberal kooks Al Grrrr and Jean Kerr�e as
your presidential candidates and drove voters to Bush.

Never heard of them.

Are you just completely unconcerned with the high crimes and

misdemeanors

of this entire administration?

Imaginary.

It doesn't matter how evil and bad for the country the Republicans

are...

as long as they get re-elected, everything must be OK.

Yes, those things do matter. But Dems are far worse. I keep
telling you that, but you're too dense to get it.

Money laundering.

Compared to BJ pardoning international fugitive Marc Rich
in exchange for $$$?

Intelligence tampering to start an offensive war.

The same intel that BJ and British lefty Tony Blair presented,
you dolt. Ketchup boy was on the Senate Intel Committee from
1993 to 2001 and he voted for the war. Care to explain?

War crimes.

None.

Treason.

If that's true, why aren't any powerful Dems in the Senate
making the case?

These are the true faces of the Republican leadership, and you are
obviously powerless to deny it.

They

obvioulsy hate America, and want a one party criminal administration to
rule. They don't care if it's a diitatorshit, a Nazi Party, or a right

wing

fascist country under the iron fist of a totalitarian madman, as long as

says republican somewhere on the stationary. They dont even care if this
madman is scrigicing their own children to serve his evil ends, they are
gladly allowing their children to go and die for bush. You seen what bthe
dummy wrote..."POWER" he's to dumb to realize how thats being abused, he
just lies the way it sounds, because democrats suck. Now, that's the

bottom

of the barrel loyalty to a party isn;t it. Support crimes, murder, and a
criminal element, because in your opnion, the other party sucks.

You still can't grasp the concept of "lesser of two evils", eh?

Go ahead and throw around the tired old Nazi and totalitarian
allegations that you libs love to use so frivolously. But it won't
help you win any elections. American voters see Dems as a
bunch of tax-raising power-grubbing bureaucrats who are too
wimpy to stand up to terrorists. THAT is why you keep losing
elections.

User: "ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	22 Oct 2005 10:06:27 AM

In article <b4ojl1lpn25nrp2flj3oopj78l2qsim5bd@4ax.com>,
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

Money laundering.

Compared to BJ pardoning international fugitive Marc Rich
in exchange for $$$?

Your idiots had your impeachment, and you chose to focus on a *****
instead of anything important. Tough.
Anyway, it doesn't compare to laundering huge sums of money to steal
elections in Texas in order to shift the balance of Congress.

Intelligence tampering to start an offensive war.

The same intel that BJ and British lefty Tony Blair presented,
you dolt. Ketchup boy was on the Senate Intel Committee from
1993 to 2001 and he voted for the war. Care to explain?

How many times does this have to be explained. It is not the same fucking
intelligence... the intel that was used to justify the war was fabricated
by Cheney and gang. All of this will be very clear next week when the
indictments start coming out.

War crimes.

None.

Torture. Prisoner abuse. Murder.
To quote Cheney... ***** yourself, Foxtrot. To claim that this
administration is not guilty of war crimes is itself criminally stupid.

Treason.

If that's true, why aren't any powerful Dems in the Senate
making the case?

Because Democrats are fucking idiot and Republicans control everything...
at the moment. But Fitzgerald will be proving the treason of the Vice
President and his cronies next week.

You still can't grasp the concept of "lesser of two evils", eh?

Democrats are stupid and somewhat incompetent. Republicans are pure evil,
as is evidenced by their purely evil actions every day. Just read the front
page of the paper.

Go ahead and throw around the tired old Nazi and totalitarian
allegations that you libs love to use so frivolously. But it won't
help you win any elections. American voters see Dems as a
bunch of tax-raising power-grubbing bureaucrats who are too
wimpy to stand up to terrorists. THAT is why you keep losing
elections.

Tax raising? What do the Republicans offer, lower taxes for the rich while
they spend spend spend spend on their cronies and pursuing frivolous wars?
Power-grubbing? What do you call exposing an American agent (that's
treason, mind you) in order to keep alive a lie that is helping you pursue
a false war?
Too wimpy to stand up to terrorists? What does invading Iraq (a
*terrorist-free* nation at the time) have ANYTHING to do with standing up
to terrorists? Where is Osama? How the ***** is Bush doing one fucking thing
about Osama????? By having our troops be killed in Iraq??? By helping
create more and more and more terrorists through frivolous invasion?
.

User: "Foxtrot"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	22 Oct 2005 02:37:56 PM

ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote:

Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

Compared to BJ pardoning international fugitive Marc Rich
in exchange for $$$?

Your idiots had your impeachment, and you chose to focus on a *****
instead of anything important. Tough.

Anyway, it doesn't compare to laundering huge sums of money to steal
elections in Texas in order to shift the balance of Congress.

Let me explain something to you, All Repudiated. When folks
try to blame all of their problems on others, like the way you're
whining about stolen elections, it sets off alarms for others. It
shows that you're a paranoid sore loser, like the loons who
believe the grassy knoll hoax about JFK's death.

The same intel that BJ and British lefty Tony Blair presented,
you dolt. Ketchup boy was on the Senate Intel Committee from
1993 to 2001 and he voted for the war. Care to explain?

How many times does this have to be explained. It is not the same fucking
intelligence... the intel that was used to justify the war was fabricated
by Cheney and gang.

Exact same intel. BJ used it to justify bombing Iraq in 98.

You still can't grasp the concept of "lesser of two evils", eh?

Democrats are stupid and somewhat incompetent. Republicans are pure evil,
as is evidenced by their purely evil actions every day.

Thanks! I'd rather be evil than stupid. Heh heh

Tax raising? What do the Republicans offer, lower taxes for the rich while
they spend spend spend spend on their cronies and pursuing frivolous wars?

Power-grubbing? What do you call exposing an American agent (that's
treason, mind you) in order to keep alive a lie that is helping you pursue
a false war?

Too wimpy to stand up to terrorists? What does invading Iraq (a
*terrorist-free* nation at the time) have ANYTHING to do with standing up
to terrorists? Where is Osama? How the ***** is Bush doing one fucking thing
about Osama????? By having our troops be killed in Iraq??? By helping
create more and more and more terrorists through frivolous invasion?

Thank you so much for the review of this week's moveon.org
talking points.
Unfortunately for you, libs are going to have to do more to
get votes than regurgitating a list of attacks against Reps.
The left's biggest problem is that they fail to offer any kind
of constructive ideas, all they do is *****.
.

User: "ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	23 Oct 2005 10:09:08 AM

In article <m13ll1lo6n44t4sk4cfpsod5mi0g8civ6k@4ax.com>,
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

By your reasoning, nobody can ever call foul in an election without being
branded a looney. Adopting this point of view would be patently idiotic
both in light of history and as we continue to move toward electronic,
no-paper-trail voting.
But you're right. I'm sure Tom DeLay's actions were PERFECTLY INNOCENT. He
only had the best interests of America in mind as he was laundering money
to illegally unbalance campaigns.

Exact same intel. BJ used it to justify bombing Iraq in 98.

Clinton acted on intel that indicated Saddam wasn't complying with U.N.
sanctions.
Bush and Cheney falsified evidence, trumped up evidence, twisted evidence,
and instructed people to generate evidence. They destroyed the career of
anyone who disagreed with their evidence. They then used this "evidence" to
start a MAJOR WAR that destabilized the entire region and ***** 95% of
the world.
These two presentations of evidence and actions upon the evidence are
completely different. No relation at all.

Democrats are stupid and somewhat incompetent. Republicans are pure evil,
as is evidenced by their purely evil actions every day.

Thanks! I'd rather be evil than stupid. Heh heh

I'd rather be neither, thank you. I can't understand why anyone votes for
any of these evil idiots.

Tax raising? What do the Republicans offer, lower taxes for the rich while
they spend spend spend spend on their cronies and pursuing frivolous wars?

Power-grubbing? What do you call exposing an American agent (that's
treason, mind you) in order to keep alive a lie that is helping you pursue
a false war?

Too wimpy to stand up to terrorists? What does invading Iraq (a
*terrorist-free* nation at the time) have ANYTHING to do with standing up
to terrorists? Where is Osama? How the ***** is Bush doing one fucking thing
about Osama????? By having our troops be killed in Iraq??? By helping
create more and more and more terrorists through frivolous invasion?

Thank you so much for the review of this week's moveon.org
talking points.

I don't think I've ever been to moveon's site. Just because something is
written somewhere doesn't make it _not_ true.

Unfortunately for you, libs are going to have to do more to
get votes than regurgitating a list of attacks against Reps.
The left's biggest problem is that they fail to offer any kind
of constructive ideas, all they do is *****.

I hope they all fail. The real problem is that third parties can't come up
with anything but idiots like Nader or Perot.
.

User: "gaffo"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	23 Oct 2005 11:42:27 AM

ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL wrote:

I hope they all fail. The real problem is that third parties can't come up
with anything but idiots like Nader or Perot.

Ron Paul - the 88 libertarian prez candidate was not an idiot. sadly he
is now a "Republican"
--
"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to
explain to us what the exit strategy is."
--Governor George W. Bush (R-TX)
"Had we gone into Baghdad -- we could have done it,
you guys could have done it, you could have been there
in 48 hours -- and then what? Which sergeant, which
private, whose life would be at stake in perhaps a
fruitless hunt in an urban guerilla war to find the
most-secure dictator in the world? Whose life would
be on my hands as the commander-in-chief because I,
unilaterally, went beyond the international law, went
beyond the stated mission, and said we're going to show
our macho? We're going into Baghdad. We're going to be
an occupying power -- America in an Arab land
-- with no allies at our side. It would have been
disastrous."
-- G. Bush 2/28/1998
.

User: "Jack A. Lopes"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	23 Oct 2005 11:08:44 AM

In article <m13ll1lo6n44t4sk4cfpsod5mi0g8civ6k@4ax.com>, Foxtrot
<foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

OK I am curious - what costructive ideas are the republicans offering?
Mostly, I see lies and crime.
.

User: "Bob"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	23 Oct 2005 11:32:44 AM

"Jack A. Lopes" <hunk@burninglove.com> wrote in message
news:231020051208446418%hunk@burninglove.com...

In article <m13ll1lo6n44t4sk4cfpsod5mi0g8civ6k@4ax.com>, Foxtrot
<foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

OK I am curious - what costructive ideas are the republicans offering?
Mostly, I see lies and crime.

Actively opposing the most serious
threat to freedom of this century. This
one issue is what I believe caused the
Democrats to lose the election in 2004.
Attempts to fix Social Security.
Reduced taxation.
I oppose many of the domestic policies
of the Republicans ...
1. Failure to secure our borders and ports.
2. Fiscal policy is irresponsible.
3. Illegal immigration policy is a failure.
4. Too slow at developing alternative energy sources.
5. Administration is too secretive.
6. Failure to propose a reasonable federal tax system.
.

User: "Foxtrot"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	23 Oct 2005 06:35:52 PM

"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote:

"Jack A. Lopes" <hunk@burninglove.com> wrote

Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

OK I am curious - what costructive ideas are the republicans offering?
Mostly, I see lies and crime.

Standing up to foreign thugs is the most important. Limp-
wristed pansies on the left like Jean Kerr�e think we should
fight a "sensitive war on terror".
Reps gave us welfare reform, which has been a smash
success. They proposed cutting pork and favors to special
interests, but haven't been much better at it than the Dems.
They proposed tort reform but so far the ambulance-chasing
trial lawyers (big donors to Dems) have blocked real
reform.
At least they offer more than the Dems, who do nothing but
complain.

Actively opposing the most serious
threat to freedom of this century. This
one issue is what I believe caused the
Democrats to lose the election in 2004.

Attempts to fix Social Security.

At this point in time. it's political poison for either party to
talk about SS reform. Dems have demagogued it to the
point that any discussion of SS reform is political suicide.

I oppose many of the domestic policies
of the Republicans ...

1. Failure to secure our borders and ports.
2. Fiscal policy is irresponsible.
3. Illegal immigration policy is a failure.

All true.

4. Too slow at developing alternative energy sources.

Not the federal government's responsibility.

5. Administration is too secretive.

Too shmoozy with big business too.

6. Failure to propose a reasonable federal tax system.

That's another issue that needs attention, but in reality
can't be touched. Dems will scream like spoiled children
if anybody tries to make the tax system more sensible.
.

User: "XTS"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	23 Oct 2005 07:43:15 PM

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in message
news:4d6ol1phro1uqb1jlp5v5q8uungkip0vjg@4ax.com...

"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote:

"Jack A. Lopes" <hunk@burninglove.com> wrote

Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

OK I am curious - what costructive ideas are the republicans offering?
Mostly, I see lies and crime.

Standing up to foreign thugs is the most important. Limp-
wristed pansies on the left like Jean Kerr�e think we should
fight a "sensitive war on terror".

Reps gave us welfare reform, which has been a smash
success. They proposed cutting pork and favors to special
interests, but haven't been much better at it than the Dems.
They proposed tort reform but so far the ambulance-chasing
trial lawyers (big donors to Dems) have blocked real
reform.

At least they offer more than the Dems, who do nothing but
complain.

Actively opposing the most serious
threat to freedom of this century. This
one issue is what I believe caused the
Democrats to lose the election in 2004.

Attempts to fix Social Security.

At this point in time. it's political poison for either party to
talk about SS reform. Dems have demagogued it to the
point that any discussion of SS reform is political suicide.

*****, Bush's SS plan was a complete failure, and thats why it is sitting
in his failed box, no other reason. It was supossed to be the centerpiece of
his 2nd term, and instead, crimes, investigations, scandal, lies and
ineptitude all are trying for the centerpiece of his 2nd term. The
discussion on SS reform could still b eongoing if the plan was viable, but
it was not.

I oppose many of the domestic policies
of the Republicans ...

1. Failure to secure our borders and ports.
2. Fiscal policy is irresponsible.
3. Illegal immigration policy is a failure.

All true.

4. Too slow at developing alternative energy sources.

Not the federal government's responsibility.

5. Administration is too secretive.

Too shmoozy with big business too.

6. Failure to propose a reasonable federal tax system.

That's another issue that needs attention, but in reality
can't be touched. Dems will scream like spoiled children
if anybody tries to make the tax system more sensible.

Why would the democrats scream, how could they. The GOP has the majority.
What about the political capitol you guys were going to weild because you
control the govt. Now you say the dems will scream. Why would such a
powerful, influential, intelligent majority care? It's not that, it because
the GOP are inept, they have no plan, but to loot the country, lie, cheat
and steal. When you guys grabbed the majority, it was a doubled edged
sword, you either succeed with it, or fail with it. Your supermen have
failed, and now you say so weakly, the "dems will scream".
Let them scream is you are so good at what you do.
After the election, you did not care who screamed, you touted your majority,
and how much you were going to do...SS, tort reform, tax reform, overhaul
the health care system, the best homeland security, the whole 9 yards, and
all you guys have done is ***** up two wars and immerse youselves in crimes,
scandals and investigations.
Big fuckin majority huh...no, the "dems will scream" ***** is out of bounds
kid, you live by your big mouths about your great victory or you go down
with it. The "dems are the minority", those are your election victory words.
Eat them now, with a healthy serving of crow. Do you know how weak and
sorry you sound now, compared to your big mouth only 11 months ago? Shame on
you for even trying to blame it on the "MINORITY." What fools you guys are.
.

User: "Foxtrot"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	23 Oct 2005 08:47:08 PM

"XTS" <xts@Xwoh.rr.com> wrote:

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote

Reps gave us welfare reform, which has been a smash
success. They proposed cutting pork and favors to special
interests, but haven't been much better at it than the Dems.
They proposed tort reform but so far the ambulance-chasing
trial lawyers (big donors to Dems) have blocked real
reform.

At least they offer more than the Dems, who do nothing but
complain.

Actively opposing the most serious
threat to freedom of this century. This
one issue is what I believe caused the
Democrats to lose the election in 2004.

Attempts to fix Social Security.

At this point in time. it's political poison for either party to
talk about SS reform. Dems have demagogued it to the
point that any discussion of SS reform is political suicide.

Bush pushed the issues as far as he could. Reps in congress
don't have the balls to implement any serious improvements in
the system.
However a big lesson was learned from Bush's proposed SS
reform. Dems vehemently rejected much-needed reform, so when
it becomes a big albatross as tens of millions of baby boomers
retire and drain the system, everybody will know that Dems are
to blame for the disaster.

That's another issue that needs attention, but in reality
can't be touched. Dems will scream like spoiled children
if anybody tries to make the tax system more sensible.

It's no secret that most Reps lack the 'nads for responsible
fiscal reform too. But most of the resistance for sensible reform
comes from the left, like the way libs resisted welfare reform.
.

User: "XTS"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	23 Oct 2005 09:41:48 PM

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in message
news:k6eol1lvuv5doaama0j3nmjc0vuesap8hn@4ax.com...

"XTS" <xts@Xwoh.rr.com> wrote:

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote

Actively opposing the most serious
threat to freedom of this century. This
one issue is what I believe caused the
Democrats to lose the election in 2004.

Attempts to fix Social Security.

At this point in time. it's political poison for either party to
talk about SS reform. Dems have demagogued it to the
point that any discussion of SS reform is political suicide.

*****, Bush's SS plan was a complete failure, and thats why it is

sitting

in his failed box, no other reason. It was supossed to be the centerpiece

his 2nd term, and instead, crimes, investigations, scandal, lies and
ineptitude all are trying for the centerpiece of his 2nd term. The
discussion on SS reform could still b eongoing if the plan was viable,

but

it was not.

Bush pushed the issues as far as he could. Reps in congress
don't have the balls to implement any serious improvements in
the system.

The bill is trash. Bush asked for someone to take it and revise it, and he
got no takers. Your republican majority is impotent and to stupid to handle
it past the post election bragging part. Since then, they and bush have
fucked up everything, are under investigation, and America is broke, at war,
and the president has no idea what to do. Thats the politcal capitol they
bragged on. I am not listening to any more excuses from any of you
apologists, excuse makers or blind loyalists. You chose the republican party
over America when you support a scoundrel like Rove, and when you will not
hold your own to honesty. I cant call you Americans, but I will refer to the
republican labeling of Anti-American criminals. it is now my turn to return
the names you calld us, because we did not agree with your criminals and
inelt legislators. ***** all of you pigs, you walow in the slop with the pigs
like Rove, you get stained with the same slop. You placed party and bragging
rights above your country, and had the nerve to call democrats
anti-american. Now you say the GOP has no balls...I DONT GIVE A
*****...they're crooks.

However a big lesson was learned from Bush's proposed SS
reform. Dems vehemently rejected much-needed reform, so when
it becomes a big albatross as tens of millions of baby boomers
retire and drain the system, everybody will know that Dems are
to blame for the disaster.

So you say, but you are also a bush apologists, and as I said, all your
capitol is spent, all you have now is empty words, lame excuses and are
still trying to shovel *****. You like the tatse so much, you continue to
eat it, I never did. I dont support criminals, I place america above party,
You shoud try it. As far as your collective whine, no one gives a *****, you
slept with the do9gs, live with the fleas.

That's another issue that needs attention, but in reality
can't be touched. Dems will scream like spoiled children
if anybody tries to make the tax system more sensible.

because

the GOP are inept, they have no plan, but to loot the country, lie, cheat
and steal. When you guys grabbed the majority, it was a doubled edged
sword, you either succeed with it, or fail with it. Your supermen have
failed, and now you say so weakly, the "dems will scream".

Let them scream is you are so good at what you do.

After the election, you did not care who screamed, you touted your

majority,

and how much you were going to do...SS, tort reform, tax reform, overhaul
the health care system, the best homeland security, the whole 9 yards,

and

all you guys have done is ***** up two wars and immerse youselves in

crimes,

scandals and investigations.

It's no secret that most Reps lack the 'nads for responsible
fiscal reform too.

Boo hoo, more lame *****. You were not saying that after the election,
all you guys were doing waas gloating over your majority. Myself, I have
never ben concerned withg "nads" I prefer honesty. You should try it, all
males are born with nads, but honesty has to fought for.
But most of the resistance for sensible reform

comes from the left, like the way libs resisted welfare reform.

The GOP ran their mouths for decades about welfare reform and a democrat
gave it to America, along with fiscal discipline. It shows you the
republicans have never delivered anything but bulllshit and talk, it took a
democrat to show this country what it's all about, and the republicans were
so fuckin jealous, they went after him like wild dogs, because he delivered
what they only talked about. Thats the heart of your party, jealousy, ego
and empty talk.
.

User: "Mitchell Holman"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	24 Oct 2005 08:40:02 AM

Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in
news:k6eol1lvuv5doaama0j3nmjc0vuesap8hn@4ax.com:

"XTS" <xts@Xwoh.rr.com> wrote:

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote

Actively opposing the most serious
threat to freedom of this century. This
one issue is what I believe caused the
Democrats to lose the election in 2004.

Attempts to fix Social Security.

At this point in time. it's political poison for either party to
talk about SS reform. Dems have demagogued it to the
point that any discussion of SS reform is political suicide.

*****, Bush's SS plan was a complete failure, and thats why it is
sitting in his failed box, no other reason. It was supossed to be the
centerpiece of his 2nd term, and instead, crimes, investigations,
scandal, lies and ineptitude all are trying for the centerpiece of his
2nd term. The discussion on SS reform could still b eongoing if the
plan was viable, but it was not.

Bush pushed the issues as far as he could. Reps in congress
don't have the balls to implement any serious improvements in
the system.

However a big lesson was learned from Bush's proposed SS
reform. Dems vehemently rejected much-needed reform, so when
it becomes a big albatross as tens of millions of baby boomers
retire and drain the system, everybody will know that Dems are
to blame for the disaster.

Bush admits his plan doesn't fix Social Security
Feb. 4, 2005
MSNBC
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - President Bush, on a road trip to
promote private Social Security accounts, acknowledged
Friday that his proposal would not by itself fix the
future financial problems of the retirement program.
Though many in his own party are wary of tampering with
a beloved domestic program, the president said he would
push ahead. "The harder the issue, the bigger the challenge,
and the more exciting it�s going to be when we get the job
done," he said.
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6906269/

That's another issue that needs attention, but in reality
can't be touched. Dems will scream like spoiled children
if anybody tries to make the tax system more sensible.

It's no secret that most Reps lack the 'nads for responsible
fiscal reform too. But most of the resistance for sensible reform
comes from the left, like the way libs resisted welfare reform.

If Bush is so interested in "fiscal reform"
why does he gleefully sign EVERY spending bill
to cross his desk?

Mitchell Holman
President Bush is the first chief executive since
John Quincy Adams in the 1820s to complete a full term
without vetoing a single spending bill.
.

User: "ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	24 Oct 2005 11:06:53 AM

In article <4d6ol1phro1uqb1jlp5v5q8uungkip0vjg@4ax.com>,
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

Standing up to foreign thugs is the most important. Limp-
wristed pansies on the left like Jean Kerr�e think we should
fight a "sensitive war on terror".

Creating terrorists is progress?
How many terrorists were active in Iraq before the draft-dodging warmonger
decided to create chaos there?
How long has Osama been in jail?
If you're saying that Iraq was about dictators not terrorists, then why
aren't we invading Saudi Arabia? Pakistan? North Korea? China? And so on
and so on and so on?????
I DARE you to explain why we invaded Iraq.

Reps gave us welfare reform, which has been a smash
success. They proposed cutting pork and favors to special
interests, but haven't been much better at it than the Dems.

What a fucking lie (typical of Republican liars). The last spending bill
has more than SIX THOUSAND pork projects. They must have been trying really
hard, huh?
This completely Republican-controlled Congress and Administration is
running a three hundred thirty billion dollar deficit. Their 2.5 Trillion
dollar budget is clear-and-away the hugest in history.
How many vetoes has Bush exercised? Right. Zero.
Fucking tax-cuts-for-rich and spend-like-crazy Republicans.

They proposed tort reform but so far the ambulance-chasing
trial lawyers (big donors to Dems) have blocked real
reform.

Here I thought the Republicans had complete majorities in the House,
Senate, and White House. How fucking ineffectual are they?

At least they offer more than the Dems, who do nothing but
complain.

The job of the minority party is to criticize. The job of the majority is
to make progress. Republicans are complete failures.
.

User: "XTS"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	24 Oct 2005 01:05:24 PM

"ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL" <impeach-us@rnc.org> wrote in message
news:impeach-us-6982F9.12065324102005@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

In article <4d6ol1phro1uqb1jlp5v5q8uungkip0vjg@4ax.com>,
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

Standing up to foreign thugs is the most important. Limp-
wristed pansies on the left like Jean Kerr�e think we should
fight a "sensitive war on terror".

Creating terrorists is progress?

How many terrorists were active in Iraq before the draft-dodging warmonger
decided to create chaos there?

How long has Osama been in jail?

If you're saying that Iraq was about dictators not terrorists, then why
aren't we invading Saudi Arabia? Pakistan? North Korea? China? And so on
and so on and so on?????

I DARE you to explain why we invaded Iraq.

Reps gave us welfare reform, which has been a smash
success. They proposed cutting pork and favors to special
interests, but haven't been much better at it than the Dems.

What a fucking lie (typical of Republican liars). The last spending bill
has more than SIX THOUSAND pork projects. They must have been trying

really

hard, huh?

This completely Republican-controlled Congress and Administration is
running a three hundred thirty billion dollar deficit. Their 2.5 Trillion
dollar budget is clear-and-away the hugest in history.

How many vetoes has Bush exercised? Right. Zero.

Fucking tax-cuts-for-rich and spend-like-crazy Republicans.

They proposed tort reform but so far the ambulance-chasing
trial lawyers (big donors to Dems) have blocked real
reform.

Here I thought the Republicans had complete majorities in the House,
Senate, and White House. How fucking ineffectual are they?

At least they offer more than the Dems, who do nothing but
complain.

The job of the minority party is to criticize. The job of the majority is
to make progress. Republicans are complete failures.

Man, you got that right. After the pary they threw celebrating their
majority, the went into neutral, then reverse. Progress, the largest
federal goverment and the largest defict, and they still call themselves
conservatives. What ajoke.
.

User: "ALL REPUBLICANS BELONG IN JAIL"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	24 Oct 2005 11:13:22 AM

In article <MUO6f.2326$NJ.1059@bignews7.bellsouth.net>,
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote:

Actively opposing the most serious
threat to freedom of this century.

It might not sound as glamorous, but actually the biggest threat to freedom
this century is about the election process. Something nobody in power wants
us to talk about.
If we continue to move to electronic ballots with no paper trail, we will
soon be completely unable to ensure that we have a democracy at all. It
will only take one well-placed corrupt person to destroy democracy
permanently.
The people making and running electronic balloting will tell you otherwise,
but ask ANY computer scientist how hard it would be to rig these systems as
they are currently formulated. It is simplicity itself.
We will never know what the actual 2004 results in Ohio were.
.

User: "Jack A. Lopes"
Title: Re: LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY	24 Oct 2005 01:30:07 PM

In article <MUO6f.2326$NJ.1059@bignews7.bellsouth.net>, Bob
<no@email.address> wrote:

"Jack A. Lopes" <hunk@burninglove.com> wrote in message
news:231020051208446418%hunk@burninglove.com...

In article <m13ll1lo6n44t4sk4cfpsod5mi0g8civ6k@4ax.com>, Foxtrot
<foxtrot@null.com> wrote:

OK I am curious - what costructive ideas are the republicans offering?
Mostly, I see lies and crime.

Actively opposing the most serious
threat to freedom of this century.

How so?

This
one issue is what I believe caused the
Democrats to lose the election in 2004.

Assuming you are talking about terrorism, you think democrats were
opposed to stopping terrorism? Why would you think that?

Attempts to fix Social Security.

Nobody is buying that BS except for maybe you. It is clear that the
republicans want to dismantle Social Security. They have been trying
to do that since its inception.

Reduced taxation.

When will that happen? Sorry, but running up a massive deficit does
not count.

I oppose many of the domestic policies
of the Republicans ...

1. Failure to secure our borders and ports.
2. Fiscal policy is irresponsible.
3. Illegal immigration policy is a failure.
4. Too slow at developing alternative energy sources.
5. Administration is too secretive.
6. Failure to propose a reasonable federal tax system.

Those are all legitimate concerns. Too bad you still believe the
party's ***** regarding issues you listed as constructive ideas.
.