Leaking Information?
Prisoners of War?
Or
Political Pimps?
When a person becomes ill, and he cannot recognize the cause for his
body's deviation from its normal constitution, he begins to seek advice
concerning the problem. This is because the solution can be found by
scrutinizing his behavior, and that of others around him.
Articles in addition to, and amendment of, The Constitution of the
United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the
legislatures of the several states pursuant to the fifth article of the
original Constitution.
I think the term amendment is being used to mean - to advocate
development through clarification. Whereas, some seem to think an
amendment to the Constitution can be used to change or reverse the
original intent.
Amendment [I]{12}Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.
Psalms 119:24 Thy testimonies also are my delight and my counsellors.
Recently, some believe they've noticed that when a person smokes, his
smoking has a detrimental health effect on himself and others around
him. And Congress has been persuaded to make laws respecting the
establishment of this new Belief. Tax dollars are being funneled to
the members of this new anti-smoking campaign/religion. And those not
converting are being persecuted by mercenaries receiving tax dollars.
Apparently, few are reading and comprehending the First Amendment.
Henry David Thoreau was imprisoned/held hostage by so-called officers
of the law for refusing to pay a mandatory tax subsidizing members of
the clergy in his community. A ransom was paid by others and Henry
Thoreau was released. Many were profiting monetarily due to so many
not comprehending/enforcing the First Amendment.
Psalms 119:61 The bands of the wicked have robbed me: but I have not
forgotten thy law.
Those without the patience require to allow education to modify our
behavior through free speech, have embraced unlawful methods of having
there will imposed on others. They say, "you can't yell fire in a
crowded theater". I say, "then the First Amendment is saying crowded
theaters are unlawful". Gag orders imposed by courts must be a
violation of law also. When a person is accused of a crime, or
arrested, he should have the right to a representative of the press
rather than a member of the Bar Association. Today, to join the ranks
of law enforcement, (CIA, FBI, military, and local police), one must
first give up his right to free speech. And then these people are
paraded around as good examples, to be followed.
Psalms 119:150 They draw nigh that follow after mischief: they are far
from thy law.
I agree with the many whom have concluded that the "Original US
Constitution" is the basis for a Christian nation. As the Constitution
has made it unlawful, so to would a follower of Jesus think it wrong
for a person's individual believes, ideas, or words to be abridged.
The First Amendment emphasizes the difference between those who follow
the teachings of Jesus, and those that kill them. Some 2000 years ago,
a group of deranged politicians began using their pocket police
officers to eliminate the teachings of Jesus from their society. This
Nazi hunter mentality has continued to this day, and free speech,
revealing the truth, is the Christian's defense against it. Its just
that simple. Over time, free speech reveals the truth to everyone,
everyone becomes a follower of the truth, and those in opposition
become less and less through open public debate. The kingdom of heaven
was at hand, for all, but a tyrannical few continued to perpetuate
their tradition of ruling in hell rather than serving in heaven.
Because it was known that they would track us to America, we were worn
to be eternally vigilant. These tyrannical few cannot survive in the
equally sharing environment free speech affords. Are "We to People"
suffering from their recent attacks?
Psalms 119:126 It is time for thee, LORD, to work: for they have made
void thy law.
Two wrongs? Is revealing a government employees identity supposed to
be wrong? Or is it being made to seem so?
The Republican spokesman in the White House, during a recent press
conference, was asked a question concerning the White House staff
people revealing the identity of a CIA employee known to disagree with
White House spin/assessment. The Republican spokesman declined to
comment on the matter due to a ongoing investigation. Does that
response make common sense, any sense? Or was its design to obscure
its purpose? If everyone involved followed the spokesman's example,
the investigation would be a waste of time. Other White House staff
members are under indictment for just such behavior, are they not? Did
the White House spokesman really miss the point of the question? Is he
not aware of the fact that the Free Press is investigating the matter
on behalf of "We The People"? Or does he realize that the Free Press
aren't allowed into political press conferences, and is really using
the Stooges before him to act out a scene? Like those in the room,
asking questions of the spokesman, are we to accept the response as
legitimate, and leave the investigation to others? We see that the
press puppets keep going back to this clown when they're called, as if
he had good advice. Are they hoping we would follow their lead, and
not get involved? Did we see an example of someone not speaking
freely, when they should have? Are we to accept that there are reasons
for restricting free speech concerning certain matters? Have you ever
heard of public inquiry? Public scrutiny? Did I just see a public
official circumvent this? Allowing people to immigrate to the U.S. for
the purpose of doing jobs U.S. citizens don't want to do, like playing
mercenaries at home and abroad for princely politicians, seems too much
like slavery, too much like living in the state of Israel, too much
like living without Jesus in our thoughts/history. One would think
that this administration could understand that if they were not "with"
the U.S. citizens, U.S. constitutional principles, then they would be
found acting against them.
Psalms 120:3 What shall be given unto thee? or what shall be done unto
thee, thou false tongue?
When we study the social structure of Yard birds/Chickens, what is
known as a pecking order is observed among the hens. When people have
meetings, research has shown that women have a tendency to be concerned
more with who is doing the talking rather than what is being said. And
that the tendency is reversed with men. Being concerned more with who
is doing the talking rather than what is being said, is political
action. And political ambitions are advanced, while real problem
solving takes a back seat. Women having leadership roles in society
benefits corrupt politicians. While, women behaving as they do in the
home helps to focus the attention of the children on the father. Do
the teachings of the Bible/History agree with this biological
tendency/philosophy?
Psalms 119:136 Rivers of waters run down mine eyes, because they keep
not thy law.
Alan
Search + Share ~ Magnetrition
http://www.angelfire.com/nj/alanejackson/index.html
.
|
