| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
14 Feb 2007 09:11:40 PM |
| Object: |
Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
From The Los Angeles Times, 2/14/07:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-libby15feb15,0,3023025.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Judge deals setbacks to Libby defense
By Richard B. Schmitt, Times Staff Writer
WASHINGTON --
I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's decision not to testify in his perjury case
backfired today when a federal judge ruled that his lawyers could not
introduce once-classified details of his workload without Libby taking
the witness stand.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton was one of two
setbacks for the defense as it finished presenting evidence in the
case without calling any additional witnesses.
Walton set closing arguments for Tuesday, and said the jury would
likely start deliberating next Wednesday.
Offering barely two days of testimony, the defense strategy appeared
to reflect a hope and belief among Libby's lawyers that the government
had failed to meet its burden of proving their client's guilt beyond a
reasonable doubt.
_______________________________________________
Scooter tried to be cute and got his ***** caught in a wringer.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
14 Feb 2007 09:30:36 PM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:arj7t25t9rllokm750vvtgb905pkl0c7n8@4ax.com...
From The Los Angeles Times, 2/14/07:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-libby15feb15,0,3023025.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Judge deals setbacks to Libby defense
By Richard B. Schmitt, Times Staff Writer
Scooter tried to be cute and got his ***** caught in a wringer.
It is always better for a defendant not to take the stand. If he doesn't
take the stand, the government can't cross-examine.
it's a push.
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 08:04:05 AM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er0k4u$ire$1@news.albasani.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:arj7t25t9rllokm750vvtgb905pkl0c7n8@4ax.com...
From The Los Angeles Times, 2/14/07:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-libby15feb15,0,3023025.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Judge deals setbacks to Libby defense
By Richard B. Schmitt, Times Staff Writer
Scooter tried to be cute and got his ***** caught in a wringer.
It is always better for a defendant not to take the stand. If he
doesn't take the stand, the government can't cross-examine.
it's a push.
Harry
I agree. The only time the defendant usually takes the stand is in really
desperate circumstances, basically when you got nothing else.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: " First-2-Die" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
14 Feb 2007 09:41:50 PM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er0k4u$ire$1@news.albasani.net...
"Hopelessly Hairy" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:arj7t25t9rllokm750vvtgb905pkl0c7n8@4ax.com...
From The Los Angeles Times, 2/14/07:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-libby15feb15,0,3023025.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Judge deals setbacks to Libby defense
By Richard B. Schmitt, Times Staff Writer
Scooter tried to be cute and got his ***** caught in a wringer.
It is always better for a defendant not to take the stand. If he
doesn't take the stand, the government can't cross-examine.
The judge's decicion also provides grounds for appeal in the event
Fitzgerald is successful in railroading a conviction.
Take heart Hairy - Scooter may be around to torment you a while longer.
Red White and Blue
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Welch" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 12:17:24 AM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er0k4u$ire$1@news.albasani.net...
It is always better for a defendant not to take the stand. If he
doesn't take the stand, the government can't cross-examine.
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the stand?
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 01:53:22 AM |
|
|
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t7unrms5fu33@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er0k4u$ire$1@news.albasani.net...
It is always better for a defendant not to take the stand. If he
doesn't take the stand, the government can't cross-examine.
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 08:32:50 AM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t7unrms5fu33@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er0k4u$ire$1@news.albasani.net...
It is always better for a defendant not to take the stand. If he
doesn't take the stand, the government can't cross-examine.
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Is it still in effect? Bush has exempted himself from so many laws it's
hard to keep track.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roger" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 02:15:55 AM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t7unrms5fu33@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er0k4u$ire$1@news.albasani.net...
It is always better for a defendant not to take the stand. If he
doesn't take the stand, the government can't cross-examine.
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
How would he lose the fifth amendment?
Would he be losing it just for himself or for everyone?
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Welch" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 11:01:00 AM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 11:03:02 AM |
|
|
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 12:30:45 PM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
That is absolutely correct.
And the jury is free to draw their own conclusions as to why he is not.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 01:37:10 PM |
|
|
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:p4mdnab1zJHxOknYnZ2dnUVZ_u7inZ2d@rcn.net...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
That is absolutely correct.
And the jury is free to draw their own conclusions as to why he is not.
and I'm sure that the judge will admonish the jury that they are not to
assume that he is guilty because he won't testify.
Remember, "innocent until proven guilty" applies to everyone. Including
repubilicans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 05:23:31 PM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er2cp8$6on$1@news.albasani.net...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:p4mdnab1zJHxOknYnZ2dnUVZ_u7inZ2d@rcn.net...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
That is absolutely correct.
And the jury is free to draw their own conclusions as to why he is not.
and I'm sure that the judge will admonish the jury that they are not to
assume that he is guilty because he won't testify.
And I'm sure the jury will make their own judgement as to that.
Remember, "innocent until proven guilty" applies to everyone. Including
repubilicans.
But not, apparently, to any one Vice President Cheney or his boy Bush deem
to be a "terrorist.."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Welch" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 06:11:14 PM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er2cp8$6on$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
That is absolutely correct.
And the jury is free to draw their own conclusions as to why he is not.
and I'm sure that the judge will admonish the jury that they are not to
assume that he is guilty because he won't testify.
Remember, "innocent until proven guilty" applies to everyone. Including
repubilicans.
So if Libby did nothing wrong - what does he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Why are you so afraid to answer that question?
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
16 Feb 2007 12:24:26 AM |
|
|
And eleven of the twelve walked into court wearing matching Valentine Day
t-shirts over their clothes.
You better hope the one who didn't brings about a hung jury.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er2cp8$6on$1@news.albasani.net...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:p4mdnab1zJHxOknYnZ2dnUVZ_u7inZ2d@rcn.net...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
That is absolutely correct.
And the jury is free to draw their own conclusions as to why he is not.
and I'm sure that the judge will admonish the jury that they are not to
assume that he is guilty because he won't testify.
Remember, "innocent until proven guilty" applies to everyone. Including
repubilicans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
16 Feb 2007 03:16:46 AM |
|
|
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:FMKdnWIGqteJ00jYnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
And eleven of the twelve walked into court wearing matching Valentine Day
t-shirts over their clothes.
You better hope the one who didn't brings about a hung jury.
What? A new jury? The mainstreammedia is hoping for it, another year of
headlines.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er2cp8$6on$1@news.albasani.net...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:p4mdnab1zJHxOknYnZ2dnUVZ_u7inZ2d@rcn.net...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
That is absolutely correct.
And the jury is free to draw their own conclusions as to why he is not.
and I'm sure that the judge will admonish the jury that they are not to
assume that he is guilty because he won't testify.
Remember, "innocent until proven guilty" applies to everyone. Including
repubilicans.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Welch" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
15 Feb 2007 11:31:35 AM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
I never said he did.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
16 Feb 2007 12:15:03 AM |
|
|
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
16 Feb 2007 03:16:02 AM |
|
|
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
16 Feb 2007 10:56:58 PM |
|
|
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
17 Feb 2007 06:50:57 AM |
|
|
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
17 Feb 2007 08:03:52 PM |
|
|
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned about Dicky's
involvement.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
17 Feb 2007 08:05:34 PM |
|
|
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nNidnRJxjOdiLkrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned about Dicky's
involvement.
And you know this because....?
and watching every episode of LA Law and Law and Order doesn't count as
going to law school.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his
authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
17 Feb 2007 08:53:30 PM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8c9g$lbe$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nNidnRJxjOdiLkrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned about
Dicky's
involvement.
And you know this because....?
and watching every episode of LA Law and Law and Order doesn't count as
going to law school.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their
influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S.
and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his
authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
17 Feb 2007 08:56:47 PM |
|
|
You really don't think Fitz would not have asked any questions of
Scooter.....about his boss?
You really are naive.
Oh, and those shows you mentioned.
We've never seen five minutes of "L.A.Law", and maybe two episodes of the
other.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8c9g$lbe$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nNidnRJxjOdiLkrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned about
Dicky's
involvement.
And you know this because....?
and watching every episode of LA Law and Law and Order doesn't count as
going to law school.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their
influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S.
and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his
authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
17 Feb 2007 10:23:11 PM |
|
|
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2uSdnYCgjsv4XUrYnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
You really don't think Fitz would not have asked any questions of
Scooter.....about his boss?
You really are naive.
Oh, and those shows you mentioned.
We've never seen five minutes of "L.A.Law", and maybe two episodes of the
other.
You still don't know what Fitzgerald would have asked. And it's a moot
point now.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8c9g$lbe$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nNidnRJxjOdiLkrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned about
Dicky's
involvement.
And you know this because....?
and watching every episode of LA Law and Law and Order doesn't count as
going to law school.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by
taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their
influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S.
and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his
authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at
long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
18 Feb 2007 06:36:39 AM |
|
|
Actually liberals know everything because they divine it so!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8kbj$vls$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2uSdnYCgjsv4XUrYnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
You really don't think Fitz would not have asked any questions of
Scooter.....about his boss?
You really are naive.
Oh, and those shows you mentioned.
We've never seen five minutes of "L.A.Law", and maybe two episodes of the
other.
You still don't know what Fitzgerald would have asked. And it's a moot
point now.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8c9g$lbe$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nNidnRJxjOdiLkrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned about
Dicky's
involvement.
And you know this because....?
and watching every episode of LA Law and Law and Order doesn't count as
going to law school.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side
having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by
taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their
influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S.
and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his
authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at
long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
18 Feb 2007 10:38:58 AM |
|
|
I'll re[eat the question.
You really think Scooter doesn't get asked about his boss?
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:rLXBh.12221$gj4.9118@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
Actually liberals know everything because they divine it so!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8kbj$vls$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2uSdnYCgjsv4XUrYnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
You really don't think Fitz would not have asked any questions of
Scooter.....about his boss?
You really are naive.
Oh, and those shows you mentioned.
We've never seen five minutes of "L.A.Law", and maybe two episodes of
the
other.
You still don't know what Fitzgerald would have asked. And it's a
moot
point now.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8c9g$lbe$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nNidnRJxjOdiLkrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned about
Dicky's
involvement.
And you know this because....?
and watching every episode of LA Law and Law and Order doesn't count
as
going to law school.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side
having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by
taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their
influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the
U.S.
and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his
authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the
United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at
long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
18 Feb 2007 11:34:34 AM |
|
|
And I'll repeat my reply you pompous, arrogant bag-of-wind lib, there's no
way I could know. Ask your persecutor Fitzpatrick, you moron.
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8uOdndT-34a-HEXYnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
I'll re[eat the question.
You really think Scooter doesn't get asked about his boss?
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:rLXBh.12221$gj4.9118@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
Actually liberals know everything because they divine it so!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8kbj$vls$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2uSdnYCgjsv4XUrYnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
You really don't think Fitz would not have asked any questions of
Scooter.....about his boss?
You really are naive.
Oh, and those shows you mentioned.
We've never seen five minutes of "L.A.Law", and maybe two episodes of
the
other.
You still don't know what Fitzgerald would have asked. And it's a
moot
point now.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8c9g$lbe$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nNidnRJxjOdiLkrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned about
Dicky's
involvement.
And you know this because....?
and watching every episode of LA Law and Law and Order doesn't count
as
going to law school.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side
having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by
taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their
influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the
U.S.
and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his
authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the
United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at
long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
18 Feb 2007 06:05:16 PM |
|
|
You lose.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:K60Ch.45480$Gr2.9249@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
And I'll repeat my reply you pompous, arrogant bag-of-wind lib, there's no
way I could know. Ask your persecutor Fitzpatrick, you moron.
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8uOdndT-34a-HEXYnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
I'll re[eat the question.
You really think Scooter doesn't get asked about his boss?
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:rLXBh.12221$gj4.9118@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
Actually liberals know everything because they divine it so!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8kbj$vls$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2uSdnYCgjsv4XUrYnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
You really don't think Fitz would not have asked any questions of
Scooter.....about his boss?
You really are naive.
Oh, and those shows you mentioned.
We've never seen five minutes of "L.A.Law", and maybe two episodes
of
the
other.
You still don't know what Fitzgerald would have asked. And it's a
moot
point now.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8c9g$lbe$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nNidnRJxjOdiLkrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned
about
Dicky's
involvement.
And you know this because....?
and watching every episode of LA Law and Law and Order doesn't
count
as
going to law school.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side
having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose by
taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I
asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their
influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the
U.S.
and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his
authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the
United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system
of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir,
at
long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Libby's decision not to testify backfires |
18 Feb 2007 08:48:32 PM |
|
|
I can't lose a game I'm not playing, you know the one in your delusional,
demented dreams lib!
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:PJydnZzVF7ogdEXYnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@comcast.com...
You lose.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:K60Ch.45480$Gr2.9249@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
And I'll repeat my reply you pompous, arrogant bag-of-wind lib, there's
no
way I could know. Ask your persecutor Fitzpatrick, you moron.
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8uOdndT-34a-HEXYnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
I'll re[eat the question.
You really think Scooter doesn't get asked about his boss?
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:rLXBh.12221$gj4.9118@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
Actually liberals know everything because they divine it so!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8kbj$vls$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2uSdnYCgjsv4XUrYnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
You really don't think Fitz would not have asked any questions of
Scooter.....about his boss?
You really are naive.
Oh, and those shows you mentioned.
We've never seen five minutes of "L.A.Law", and maybe two episodes
of
the
other.
You still don't know what Fitzgerald would have asked. And it's
a
moot
point now.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er8c9g$lbe$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nNidnRJxjOdiLkrYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
If Scooter had taken the stand he would have been questioned
about
Dicky's
involvement.
And you know this because....?
and watching every episode of LA Law and Law and Order doesn't
count
as
going to law school.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RSCBh.10991$gj4.4786@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gPudnTqIzL-PFkvYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Yes, because if he goes on the stand things get worse.
You can prove that, right?
But of course you can't lib; then again what else doe your side
having
except pulling horse-***** lies from your *****!
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er3soo$2nb$1@news.albasani.net...
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sdidnb-fCaR81kjYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Who's decision was that?
The Defense?
More to the point. The defendant.
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er23o8$m2i$1@news.albasani.net...
"Joseph Welch" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:12t94ehbnn9i94c@corp.supernews.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:er13hk$t6p$1@news.albasani.net...
If Libby did nothing wrong - what's he have to lose
by
taking
the
stand?
Fifth amendment. Ever hear of it?
Yep.
What does that have to do with the question that I
asked?
In short, he doesn't have to take the stand.
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their
influence
wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack
the
U.S.
and
other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused
his
authority
and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the
United
States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by
undermining
American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system
of
government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir,
at
long
last?
Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr
.
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
