| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Dope" |
| Date: |
20 Jul 2005 12:18:46 PM |
| Object: |
Li'l Chuckie Schumer speaks out |
LITTLE CHUCKY SCHUMER SPEAKS OUT
It didn't take long after Bush's announcement of his choice for the Senate's
reigning media ***** to run down to the Senate gallery and grab a microphone
and start making demands. Schumer said he didn't vote for Roberts for the DC
Court of Appeals because he didn't answer some questions Chucky wanted
answered. Then, the junior (in stature) Senator from New York said this:
"The burden is on a nominee to the Supreme Court to prove that he is worthy,
not on the Senate to prove that he is unworthy."
How's that for being guilty until proven innocent? But that's how the left
views this. In their twisted little world, they should get to pick the
nominee for the court. They want to take 'advise and consent' to a whole new
level. Also, such is their hatred for George Bush, they will do everything
in their power to deny him his choice for the bench.
It will be interesting to see what happens. If Schumer and his buddies in
the Democratic party smell blood, that is if they realize they have 40 votes
against Roberts, you can bet they'll filibuster. All these nice things
they're saying about keeping their powder dry, giving the nominee a fair
hearing and all of that...you can forget it.
The left's last dying grasp on power in Washington D.C. is the United States
Supreme Court, which they view as a lawmaking branch of government.
Replacing Sandra Day O'Connor with John Roberts represents a loss of that
power.
No matter what they say now, they're not going to go quietly.
--
"Mine will be the most ethical administration in the history of the
republic!"
President-Elect Bill Clinton, November 1992.
.
|
|
| User: "DAT" |
|
| Title: Re: Li'l Chuckie Schumer speaks out |
20 Jul 2005 01:39:44 PM |
|
|
"Harry Dope" <HD@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:WHvDe.27230$3j2.702682@twister.southeast.rr.com...
LITTLE CHUCKY SCHUMER SPEAKS OUT
It didn't take long after Bush's announcement of his choice for the
Senate's reigning media ***** to run down to the Senate gallery and grab a
microphone and start making demands. Schumer said he didn't vote for
Roberts for the DC Court of Appeals because he didn't answer some
questions Chucky wanted answered. Then, the junior (in stature) Senator
from New York said this:
"The burden is on a nominee to the Supreme Court to prove that he is
worthy, not on the Senate to prove that he is unworthy."
How's that for being guilty until proven innocent?
Ever have a job interview you fucking moron?
When they asked for your resume, did you scream at them about being innocent
before proven guilty.
Such a person should be given as much consideration as we should you post.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: Li'l Chuckie Schumer speaks out |
20 Jul 2005 12:28:56 PM |
|
|
"Harry Dope" <HD@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:WHvDe.27230$3j2.702682@twister.southeast.rr.com...
LITTLE CHUCKY SCHUMER SPEAKS OUT
It didn't take long after Bush's announcement of his choice for the
Senate's reigning media ***** to run down to the Senate gallery and grab a
microphone and start making demands. Schumer said he didn't vote for
Roberts for the DC Court of Appeals because he didn't answer some
questions Chucky wanted answered. Then, the junior (in stature) Senator
from New York said this:
"The burden is on a nominee to the Supreme Court to prove that he is
worthy, not on the Senate to prove that he is unworthy."
How's that for being guilty until proven innocent? But that's how the left
views this. In their twisted little world, they should get to pick the
nominee for the court. They want to take 'advise and consent' to a whole
new level. Also, such is their hatred for George Bush, they will do
everything in their power to deny him his choice for the bench.
It will be interesting to see what happens. If Schumer and his buddies in
the Democratic party smell blood, that is if they realize they have 40
votes against Roberts, you can bet they'll filibuster. All these nice
things they're saying about keeping their powder dry, giving the nominee a
fair hearing and all of that...you can forget it.
The left's last dying grasp on power in Washington D.C. is the United
States Supreme Court, which they view as a lawmaking branch of government.
Replacing Sandra Day O'Connor with John Roberts represents a loss of that
power.
No matter what they say now, they're not going to go quietly.
Don't worry, everyone knows career liar Frist will do the nuclear option
the second he gets a chance. If Bush nominated Saddam he'd do it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Dope" |
|
| Title: Re: Li'l Chuckie Schumer speaks out |
20 Jul 2005 12:33:29 PM |
|
|
What has Dr. Frist lied about?
--
"Mine will be the most ethical administration in the history of the
republic!"
President-Elect Bill Clinton, November 1992.
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@itg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:dbm1ko$rgf$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"Harry Dope" <HD@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:WHvDe.27230$3j2.702682@twister.southeast.rr.com...
LITTLE CHUCKY SCHUMER SPEAKS OUT
It didn't take long after Bush's announcement of his choice for the
Senate's reigning media ***** to run down to the Senate gallery and grab
a microphone and start making demands. Schumer said he didn't vote for
Roberts for the DC Court of Appeals because he didn't answer some
questions Chucky wanted answered. Then, the junior (in stature) Senator
from New York said this:
"The burden is on a nominee to the Supreme Court to prove that he is
worthy, not on the Senate to prove that he is unworthy."
How's that for being guilty until proven innocent? But that's how the
left views this. In their twisted little world, they should get to pick
the nominee for the court. They want to take 'advise and consent' to a
whole new level. Also, such is their hatred for George Bush, they will do
everything in their power to deny him his choice for the bench.
It will be interesting to see what happens. If Schumer and his buddies in
the Democratic party smell blood, that is if they realize they have 40
votes against Roberts, you can bet they'll filibuster. All these nice
things they're saying about keeping their powder dry, giving the nominee
a fair hearing and all of that...you can forget it.
The left's last dying grasp on power in Washington D.C. is the United
States Supreme Court, which they view as a lawmaking branch of
government. Replacing Sandra Day O'Connor with John Roberts represents a
loss of that power.
No matter what they say now, they're not going to go quietly.
Don't worry, everyone knows career liar Frist will do the nuclear option
the second he gets a chance. If Bush nominated Saddam he'd do it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: Li'l Chuckie Schumer speaks out |
20 Jul 2005 01:47:31 PM |
|
|
"Harry Dope" <HD@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:JVvDe.24181$Kp2.1125453@twister.southeast.rr.com...
What has Dr. Frist lied about?
You can choose from 113,000 hits.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Frist+%2Blied&btnG=Google+Search
Why can't you do that?
--
"Mine will be the most ethical administration in the history of the
republic!"
President-Elect Bill Clinton, November 1992.
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@itg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:dbm1ko$rgf$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"Harry Dope" <HD@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:WHvDe.27230$3j2.702682@twister.southeast.rr.com...
LITTLE CHUCKY SCHUMER SPEAKS OUT
It didn't take long after Bush's announcement of his choice for the
Senate's reigning media ***** to run down to the Senate gallery and grab
a microphone and start making demands. Schumer said he didn't vote for
Roberts for the DC Court of Appeals because he didn't answer some
questions Chucky wanted answered. Then, the junior (in stature) Senator
from New York said this:
"The burden is on a nominee to the Supreme Court to prove that he is
worthy, not on the Senate to prove that he is unworthy."
How's that for being guilty until proven innocent? But that's how the
left views this. In their twisted little world, they should get to pick
the nominee for the court. They want to take 'advise and consent' to a
whole new level. Also, such is their hatred for George Bush, they will
do everything in their power to deny him his choice for the bench.
It will be interesting to see what happens. If Schumer and his buddies
in the Democratic party smell blood, that is if they realize they have
40 votes against Roberts, you can bet they'll filibuster. All these nice
things they're saying about keeping their powder dry, giving the nominee
a fair hearing and all of that...you can forget it.
The left's last dying grasp on power in Washington D.C. is the United
States Supreme Court, which they view as a lawmaking branch of
government. Replacing Sandra Day O'Connor with John Roberts represents a
loss of that power.
No matter what they say now, they're not going to go quietly.
Don't worry, everyone knows career liar Frist will do the nuclear option
the second he gets a chance. If Bush nominated Saddam he'd do it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DAT" |
|
| Title: Re: Li'l Chuckie Schumer speaks out |
20 Jul 2005 01:48:30 PM |
|
|
"Harry Dope" <HD@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:JVvDe.24181$Kp2.1125453@twister.southeast.rr.com...
What has Dr. Frist lied about?
The Schiavo "diagnosis"
Must not be as good a doctor as he is a lying politician.
He also lied about the the nuclear option being a return to constitutional
traditions, and that he had never voted to fillibuster a judicial nominee.
Senators Kerry, Kennedy, Boxer, Feingold and 15 others voted to end all
filibusters in the Senate, not just for judicial nominees, in 1995. And
every single current Republican voted against it. But they've exchanged
scripts now, reading the same words they feigned such outrage at a few years
ago.
.
|
|
|
| User: "enialle" |
|
| Title: Re: Li'l Chuckie Schumer speaks out |
21 Jul 2005 09:02:48 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:48:30 -0700, "DAT" <nospam@nospm.com> wrote:
"Harry Dope" <HD@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:JVvDe.24181$Kp2.1125453@twister.southeast.rr.com...
What has Dr. Frist lied about?
The Schiavo "diagnosis"
Must not be as good a doctor as he is a lying politician.
and a thief:
Bill Frist Got Rich and Powerful through Medical Fraud and Felonies
20-Dec-02
Bill Frist
Nathan Newman writes, "Frist is literally the child of corporate
medical fraud and union-busting. While he bills himself as a heart
surgeon, his relevant position was as member of the family which
founded what became the massive HCA/Columbia health care hospital
chain. Bill Frist's personal stake in the family fortune is unknown
exactly (in the tens of millions), but his brother's share according
to Forbes is $950 million... And how did HCA/Columbia get rich?
Raiding nonprofit hospitals, dumping the poor previously served and
turning them into profit mills for the family bottom line. Oh yeah,
and massive fraud against the Medicare system, a fact that led to a
$745 million criminal fine against the company back in 2000. What was
the nature of the fraud? The worst possible in corrupting the
patient-client relationship to the point of endangering lives. Marc
Gardner was a vice-president at HCA/Columbia where he says he
'committed felonies every day.'"
http://www.nathannewman.org/log/archives/000639.shtml
Bill Frist is a ***** for the Medical-Industrial Complex
20-Dec-02
Bill Frist
The for-profit corporate medical system has driven health care costs
into outer space, and subjected patients to the torture of unnecessary
surgery and devastating drugs. But Senator Bill Frist's "father and
brother helped found what became HCA, the nation's largest hospital
company, which is the focus of a long-running government inquiry into
accusations of health care fraud. On Wednesday, HCA said it had
reached a settlement of more than $880 million with the Justice
Department. The accord calls for HCA to pay $630 million after
agreeing previously to pay $250 million. Mr. Frist has long said that
all his holdings were in a blind trust, although his opponents over
the years have painted him as too sympathetic toward the health care
industry" - in other words, a ***** for the powerful
medical-industrial complex. And despite his less than Neanderthal
appearance, NARAL says Frist is "very much an anti-choice member of
Congress."
http://archive.democrats.com/preview.cfm?term=Bill%20Frist
He also lied about the the nuclear option being a return to constitutional
traditions, and that he had never voted to fillibuster a judicial nominee.
Senators Kerry, Kennedy, Boxer, Feingold and 15 others voted to end all
filibusters in the Senate, not just for judicial nominees, in 1995. And
every single current Republican voted against it. But they've exchanged
scripts now, reading the same words they feigned such outrage at a few years
ago.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nostrobino" |
|
| Title: Re: Li'l Chuckie Schumer speaks out |
20 Jul 2005 01:34:04 PM |
|
|
"Harry Dope" <HD@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:WHvDe.27230$3j2.702682@twister.southeast.rr.com...
LITTLE CHUCKY SCHUMER SPEAKS OUT
It didn't take long after Bush's announcement of his choice for the
Senate's reigning media ***** to run down to the Senate gallery and grab a
microphone and start making demands. Schumer said he didn't vote for
Roberts for the DC Court of Appeals because he didn't answer some
questions Chucky wanted answered. Then, the junior (in stature) Senator
from New York said this:
"The burden is on a nominee to the Supreme Court to prove that he is
worthy, not on the Senate to prove that he is unworthy."
Typical Chuck Schmuck. He thinks the world revolves around him now that he's
a senator. He apparently believes a New York senator is something like a
president, only higher.
N.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Im Right" |
|
| Title: Re: Li'l Chuckie Schumer speaks out |
20 Jul 2005 12:32:12 PM |
|
|
that is UPChuck schumer
"Harry Dope" <HD@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:WHvDe.27230$3j2.702682@twister.southeast.rr.com...
LITTLE CHUCKY SCHUMER SPEAKS OUT
It didn't take long after Bush's announcement of his choice for the
Senate's
reigning media ***** to run down to the Senate gallery and grab a
microphone
and start making demands. Schumer said he didn't vote for Roberts for the
DC
Court of Appeals because he didn't answer some questions Chucky wanted
answered. Then, the junior (in stature) Senator from New York said this:
"The burden is on a nominee to the Supreme Court to prove that he is
worthy,
not on the Senate to prove that he is unworthy."
How's that for being guilty until proven innocent? But that's how the left
views this. In their twisted little world, they should get to pick the
nominee for the court. They want to take 'advise and consent' to a whole
new
level. Also, such is their hatred for George Bush, they will do everything
in their power to deny him his choice for the bench.
It will be interesting to see what happens. If Schumer and his buddies in
the Democratic party smell blood, that is if they realize they have 40
votes
against Roberts, you can bet they'll filibuster. All these nice things
they're saying about keeping their powder dry, giving the nominee a fair
hearing and all of that...you can forget it.
The left's last dying grasp on power in Washington D.C. is the United
States
Supreme Court, which they view as a lawmaking branch of government.
Replacing Sandra Day O'Connor with John Roberts represents a loss of that
power.
No matter what they say now, they're not going to go quietly.
--
"Mine will be the most ethical administration in the history of the
republic!"
President-Elect Bill Clinton, November 1992.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
