"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such
time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent,
for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension,
the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

Propaganda Minister Goebbels

Since Limbaugh's content comes from RNC think tanks, this must mean
another attack will be "engineered" soon. Of course, it will be
softies and lefties who are to blame for it. I wonder what it will be.

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:10:57 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR
HOMICIDE <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

Actually, he's right.

The Dems opposed the Patriotic Act,

they opposed keeping war criminals in military prisons,

they've consistently oppsed tighter restrictions on immigration,

they've underminded our morale and
the war on terror by comparing the US troops to Nazis and the
Gulags

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200506150006

Nationally syndicated radio host Rush Limbaugh declared that "if we
get hit again" by terrorists, it will be the fault of Democratic
senators, the mainstream media, and Amnesty International, "who have
names and identities and spend their every waking moment trying to
obstruct our ability to secure intelligence information for our own
national security."

From the June 14 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show: LIMBAUGH: Let me
tell you something, folks, if we are hit again, if we
are hit again, we need to hold these people in our country who are
undermining our efforts responsible. It ain't going to be the FBI's
fault next time. It isn't going to be the CIA's fault next time. It
isn't going to be some bureaucracy's fault next time. It's going to be
the fault of politicians, left-wing groups and the like who have names
and identities and spend their every waking moment trying to obstruct
our ability to secure intelligence information for our own national
security.

You want some names: [Sen. Patrick] Leahy [D-VT], [Sen. Joseph R.]
Biden [D-DE], [Sen. Richard J.] Durbin [D-IL], [Sen. Barbara] Boxer
[D-CA], [Sen. Edward] Kennedy [D-MA], [Senate Majority Leader Harry]
Reid [D-NV], Newsweek, Time, The New York Times, Amnesty
International. If we get hit again, these are the names of the people
and organizations we need to look at when we're trying to find out why
and how it happened.

Participating in this newsgroup causes me to struggle daily with the
hard-core right's inability to see beyond the nose on their face.

I know plenty of liberals, and there's not one of them who wouldn't put a
bullet in the brain of bin Laden or the knuckleheads killing Marines in
Fallujah. We love America, and we appreciate the efforts and sacrifice of
our troops, and we want them to have the tools they need to do the job.
EVERYONE I know feels that way.

Where we part ways with the neo-cons is we don't believe that we should
have been there to begin with. We believe that a standard needs to be
established that says "hey, once we reach this point we can withdraw." We
need to get the right number of people over there to meet whatever
standard that is, because as it stands they don't have enough troops to do
the job that Bush is asking them to do, and that number is just going to
go up as the Brits begin to withdraw their forces.

I don't hate George Bush. I don't hate (with a few notable exceptions)
the conservatives I know. I'm not attacking them or their faith.

I do think he lied - he wanted us to go into Iraq, and I believe his
Administration fit the intelligence they presented . I do think he's got
rose-colored glasses on with respect to the trouble we're in over there.

I don't love John Kerry or the Democrats. I don't think they're perfect.
I trust them more than I trust Bush, and I'm entitled to say that, and I'm
entitled to say that PUBLICLY without being called a traitor.

I think I'm a lot like most Americans right now ... and we love this
country every bit as much as any conservative.

Tim

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200506150006

Nationally syndicated radio host Rush Limbaugh declared that "if we
get hit again" by terrorists, it will be the fault of Democratic
senators, the mainstream media, and Amnesty International, "who have
names and identities and spend their every waking moment trying to
obstruct our ability to secure intelligence information for our own
national security."

From the June 14 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: Let me tell you something, folks, if we are hit again, if we
are hit again, we need to hold these people in our country who are
undermining our efforts responsible. It ain't going to be the FBI's
fault next time. It isn't going to be the CIA's fault next time. It
isn't going to be some bureaucracy's fault next time. It's going to be
the fault of politicians, left-wing groups and the like who have names
and identities and spend their every waking moment trying to obstruct
our ability to secure intelligence information for our own national
security.

You want some names: [Sen. Patrick] Leahy [D-VT], [Sen. Joseph R.]
Biden [D-DE], [Sen. Richard J.] Durbin [D-IL], [Sen. Barbara] Boxer
[D-CA], [Sen. Edward] Kennedy [D-MA], [Senate Majority Leader Harry]
Reid [D-NV], Newsweek, Time, The New York Times, Amnesty
International. If we get hit again, these are the names of the people
and organizations we need to look at when we're trying to find out why
and how it happened.

Participating in this newsgroup causes me to struggle daily with the
hard-core right's inability to see beyond the nose on their face.

I know plenty of liberals, and there's not one of them who wouldn't put
a bullet in the brain of bin Laden or the knuckleheads killing Marines
in Fallujah. We love America, and we appreciate the efforts and
sacrifice of our troops, and we want them to have the tools they need to
do the job. EVERYONE I know feels that way.

Where we part ways with the neo-cons is we don't believe that we should
have been there to begin with. We believe that a standard needs to be
established that says "hey, once we reach this point we can withdraw."
We need to get the right number of people over there to meet whatever
standard that is, because as it stands they don't have enough troops to
do the job that Bush is asking them to do, and that number is just going
to go up as the Brits begin to withdraw their forces.

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200506150006

Nationally syndicated radio host Rush Limbaugh declared that "if we
get hit again" by terrorists, it will be the fault of Democratic
senators, the mainstream media, and Amnesty International, "who have
names and identities and spend their every waking moment trying to
obstruct our ability to secure intelligence information for our own
national security."

From the June 14 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: Let me tell you something, folks, if we are hit again, if we
are hit again, we need to hold these people in our country who are
undermining our efforts responsible. It ain't going to be the FBI's
fault next time. It isn't going to be the CIA's fault next time. It
isn't going to be some bureaucracy's fault next time. It's going to be
the fault of politicians, left-wing groups and the like who have names
and identities and spend their every waking moment trying to obstruct
our ability to secure intelligence information for our own national
security.

You want some names: [Sen. Patrick] Leahy [D-VT], [Sen. Joseph R.]
Biden [D-DE], [Sen. Richard J.] Durbin [D-IL], [Sen. Barbara] Boxer
[D-CA], [Sen. Edward] Kennedy [D-MA], [Senate Majority Leader Harry]
Reid [D-NV], Newsweek, Time, The New York Times, Amnesty
International. If we get hit again, these are the names of the people
and organizations we need to look at when we're trying to find out why
and how it happened.

Participating in this newsgroup causes me to struggle daily with the
hard-core right's inability to see beyond the nose on their face.

I know plenty of liberals, and there's not one of them who wouldn't put
a bullet in the brain of bin Laden or the knuckleheads killing Marines
in Fallujah. We love America, and we appreciate the efforts and
sacrifice of our troops, and we want them to have the tools they need to
do the job. EVERYONE I know feels that way.

Where we part ways with the neo-cons is we don't believe that we should
have been there to begin with. We believe that a standard needs to be
established that says "hey, once we reach this point we can withdraw."
We need to get the right number of people over there to meet whatever
standard that is, because as it stands they don't have enough troops to
do the job that Bush is asking them to do, and that number is just going
to go up as the Brits begin to withdraw their forces.

I don't hate George Bush. I don't hate (with a few notable exceptions)
the conservatives I know. I'm not attacking them or their faith.

I do think he lied - he wanted us to go into Iraq, and I believe his
Administration fit the intelligence they presented . I do think he's
got rose-colored glasses on with respect to the trouble we're in over there.

I don't love John Kerry or the Democrats. I don't think they're
perfect. I trust them more than I trust Bush, and I'm entitled to say
that, and I'm entitled to say that PUBLICLY without being called a traitor.

I think I'm a lot like most Americans right now ... and we love this
country every bit as much as any conservative.

Tim

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200506150006

Participating in this newsgroup causes me to struggle daily with the
hard-core right's inability to see beyond the nose on their face.

I know plenty of liberals, and there's not one of them who wouldn't put
a bullet in the brain of bin Laden or the knuckleheads killing Marines
in Fallujah. We love America, and we appreciate the efforts and
sacrifice of our troops, and we want them to have the tools they need to
do the job. EVERYONE I know feels that way.

Where we part ways with the neo-cons is we don't believe that we should
have been there to begin with. We believe that a standard needs to be
established that says "hey, once we reach this point we can withdraw."

We need to get the right number of people over there to meet whatever
standard that is, because as it stands they don't have enough troops to
do the job that Bush is asking them to do, and that number is just going
to go up as the Brits begin to withdraw their forces.

I don't hate George Bush. I don't hate (with a few notable exceptions)
the conservatives I know. I'm not attacking them or their faith.

I do think he lied - he wanted us to go into Iraq, and I believe his
Administration fit the intelligence they presented . I do think he's
got rose-colored glasses on with respect to the trouble we're in over there.

I think I'm a lot like most Americans right now ... and we love this
country every bit as much as any conservative.