| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
07 Dec 2005 03:23:07 PM |
| Object: |
Lying Chickenhawk traitor ***** Cyst Limbaugh attacks Vietnam vet |
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_david_si_051206_rush__22ass_cyst_22_limb.htm
Rush "***** Cyst" Limbaugh Attacks Vietnam Vet, Calls For Radical Change
in Military Policy
by David Sirota
Sometimes you just have to just laugh at Rush Limbaugh.
Here's a guy who dodged the Vietnam War draft by citing a cyst on his
***** (no joke), and yet who accuses Vietnam War heroes essentially of
treason.
Today, Limbaugh's attack is on Sen. John Kerry (D-MA).
You remember him -- he's that guy who actually went over and served in
Vietnam, while Limbaugh sat home, dropped his pants, and pointed his
draft board to a cyst on his own ***** in order to avoid serving his
country.
Limbaugh is actually claiming that Kerry called American troops
terrorists this weekend on CBS.
Boy that would be real bad...if it were even close to true.
So let's go to the transcript, shall we, to see if old Rush "***** Cyst"
Limbaugh is telling us the truth:
KERRY:... There is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need
to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing
kids and children...
Yes, that's right -- Limbaugh and other right-wing outfits claim that
means Kerry is calling American soldiers terrorists.
Clearly he's not -- he said "there is no reason" for them to be
required to do that as the war intensifies.
He went on to say that it is time for the Iraqis to enforce their own
security.
And that begs a question:
does ***** Cyst Limbaugh -- the same guy who avoided combat -- actually
WANT American troops to start "going into the homes of Iraqis in the
dead of night, terrorizing kids and children?"
Because that's what he is actually endorsing.
I don't know about you, but I'd bet military commanders in the field
would think that's a bad idea.
Actually, we don't have to bet - we can just look at the record and
see that yes, top military commanders agree with Kerry - not with *****
Cyst Limbaugh.
For instance, back in 2003, the UK Guardian reported that Lieutenant
General Ricardo Sanchez, head of the allied forces in Iraq, "said the
US had decided to revise its strategy and limit the scope of raids
after being warned they were alienating the public."
He said, "It was a fact that I started to get multiple indicators that
maybe our iron-fisted approach to the conduct of ops was beginning to
alienate Iraqis. I started to get those sensings from multiple
sources, all the way from the governing council down to average
people."
Earlier this year, the Washington Post reported that the U.S. military
was rightly questioning its own raid strategy -- as Kerry alluded to
-- because:
"The raids turn up little and leave hard feelings among civilians who
resent foreign soldiers bursting into their homes, breaking doors and
gates and pointing guns at their heads. They resent these men catching
their wives and daughters in their bedclothes. They resent them
barking orders, telling them to get on the ground, invading their
homes, emptying drawers and turning over mattresses."
So let's be clear:
what ***** Cyst Limbaugh is doing is both lying about Kerry, and
frontally endorsing a radical change in U.S. military policy whereby
our soldiers actually do start terrorizing people.
He is doing this, even as our own military says that would be a
mistake.
But then, ***** Cyst Limbaugh always talks with such confidence that
maybe we should we should call him Sgt. ***** Warts Limbaugh, issue him
a weapon, put him in uniform, and send him over to actually implement
his new house-to-house urban combat raid strategy.
He seems so excited and supportive of it -- and so determined to have
the U.S. military commanders adopt his ideas - I'll bet he's ready to
go serve his country, right?
___________________________________________________________
http://www.nhgazette.com/news/chickenhawks/barking_head_brigade/
Name: Rush Limbaugh
Born: 1951
Employer: Yack Radio
Conflict Avoided: Vietnam
Notes: Where to begin ... a joke about the Hindenburg? No, let's go
right to the reason he had to stay home from the war - the world's
most famous anal cyst. He's denied it, but www.snopes.com, the Urban
Legends Reference Pages, has got the goods on him.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "tightwad" |
|
| Title: Re: Lying Chickenhawk traitor ***** Cyst Limbaugh attacks Vietnam vet |
07 Dec 2005 09:35:10 PM |
|
|
Kerry is a pimple on the south end or a north bound *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Hope" |
|
| Title: LIBERAL AT MIAMI AIRPORT TELLS PEOPLE HE HAS A BOMB! ==> Lying Chickenhawk traitor ***** Cyst Limbaugh attacks Vietnam vet |
07 Dec 2005 05:58:27 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:23:07 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_david_si_051206_rush__22ass_cyst_22_limb.htm
Rush "***** Cyst" Limbaugh Attacks Vietnam Vet, Calls For Radical Change
in Military Policy
by David Sirota
Sometimes you just have to just laugh at Rush Limbaugh.
Here's a guy who dodged the Vietnam War draft by citing a cyst on his
***** (no joke), and yet who accuses Vietnam War heroes essentially of
treason.
Today, Limbaugh's attack is on Sen. John Kerry (D-MA).
You remember him -- he's that guy who actually went over and served in
Vietnam, while Limbaugh sat home, dropped his pants, and pointed his
draft board to a cyst on his own ***** in order to avoid serving his
country.
Limbaugh is actually claiming that Kerry called American troops
terrorists this weekend on CBS.
Boy that would be real bad...if it were even close to true.
So let's go to the transcript, shall we, to see if old Rush "***** Cyst"
Limbaugh is telling us the truth:
KERRY:... There is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need
to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing
kids and children...
Yes, that's right -- Limbaugh and other right-wing outfits claim that
means Kerry is calling American soldiers terrorists.
Clearly he's not -- he said "there is no reason" for them to be
required to do that as the war intensifies.
He went on to say that it is time for the Iraqis to enforce their own
security.
And that begs a question:
does ***** Cyst Limbaugh -- the same guy who avoided combat -- actually
WANT American troops to start "going into the homes of Iraqis in the
dead of night, terrorizing kids and children?"
Because that's what he is actually endorsing.
I don't know about you, but I'd bet military commanders in the field
would think that's a bad idea.
Actually, we don't have to bet - we can just look at the record and
see that yes, top military commanders agree with Kerry - not with *****
Cyst Limbaugh.
For instance, back in 2003, the UK Guardian reported that Lieutenant
General Ricardo Sanchez, head of the allied forces in Iraq, "said the
US had decided to revise its strategy and limit the scope of raids
after being warned they were alienating the public."
He said, "It was a fact that I started to get multiple indicators that
maybe our iron-fisted approach to the conduct of ops was beginning to
alienate Iraqis. I started to get those sensings from multiple
sources, all the way from the governing council down to average
people."
Earlier this year, the Washington Post reported that the U.S. military
was rightly questioning its own raid strategy -- as Kerry alluded to
-- because:
"The raids turn up little and leave hard feelings among civilians who
resent foreign soldiers bursting into their homes, breaking doors and
gates and pointing guns at their heads. They resent these men catching
their wives and daughters in their bedclothes. They resent them
barking orders, telling them to get on the ground, invading their
homes, emptying drawers and turning over mattresses."
So let's be clear:
what ***** Cyst Limbaugh is doing is both lying about Kerry, and
frontally endorsing a radical change in U.S. military policy whereby
our soldiers actually do start terrorizing people.
He is doing this, even as our own military says that would be a
mistake.
But then, ***** Cyst Limbaugh always talks with such confidence that
maybe we should we should call him Sgt. ***** Warts Limbaugh, issue him
a weapon, put him in uniform, and send him over to actually implement
his new house-to-house urban combat raid strategy.
He seems so excited and supportive of it -- and so determined to have
the U.S. military commanders adopt his ideas - I'll bet he's ready to
go serve his country, right?
___________________________________________________________
http://www.nhgazette.com/news/chickenhawks/barking_head_brigade/
Name: Rush Limbaugh
Born: 1951
Employer: Yack Radio
Conflict Avoided: Vietnam
Notes: Where to begin ... a joke about the Hindenburg? No, let's go
right to the reason he had to stay home from the war - the world's
most famous anal cyst. He's denied it, but www.snopes.com, the Urban
Legends Reference Pages, has got the goods on him.
Harry
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TheNIGHTCRAWLER" |
|
| Title: Re: Lying Chickenhawk traitor ***** Cyst Limbaugh attacks Vietnam vet |
07 Dec 2005 03:39:01 PM |
|
|
What branch of service were you in? Brownies?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sid9" |
|
| Title: Re: Lying Chickenhawk traitor ***** Cyst Limbaugh attacks Vietnam vet |
07 Dec 2005 03:54:38 PM |
|
|
TheNIGHTCRAWLER wrote:
What branch of service were you in? Brownies?
Can the United States 'win' the war in Iraq?
Yes, within two years 14% 25,100 votes
Yes, but a long haul 25% 46,184 votes
No 62% 114,251 votes
Total: 185,535 votes
CNN Poll today
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|