Politics > Politics-USA > LYING neo-con ***** michelle malkin continues her hollow, pathetic attacks on Ron Paul on 9/11 truth
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"AirRaid" |
| Date: |
17 May 2007 03:12:40 PM |
| Object: |
LYING neo-con ***** michelle malkin continues her hollow, pathetic attacks on Ron Paul on 9/11 truth |
http://tinyurl.com/2o42gc
Yet Another Fox News Smear Job On Ron Paul, Alex Jones & 9/11 Truth
Malkin, Gibson attack "9/11 conspiracy nut" Alex Jones, say Paul
should be kicked out of debates for appearing on his show, suggest
Middle Easterners enjoy being bombed and to claim otherwise is a tin-
foil hat conspiracy theory
Prison Planet | May 17, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson
Fox "News" anchor John Gibson was joined by diehard Neo-Con Michele
"put every Muslim in a concentration camp" Malkin last night to attack
Ron Paul, Alex Jones and suggest that people in the Middle East enjoy
being bombed and to state otherwise is a tin-foil hat conspiracy
theory.
First of all, Gibson lies outright by claiming Ron Paul said the U.S.
had a hand in the 9/11 attacks, something the Texas Congressman has
never stated. He then brings on Malkin, who remains the poster child
for a dwindling gaggle of Internet Neo-Con blowhards.
Malkin knows which side her bread is buttered on and is perfectly
aware of the fact that Prison Planet alone dwarfs the popularity of
her own measly Neo-Con "Hot Air" blog. She seems to have a dangerous
obsession with attacking us and most of the time we ignore her but
this one was too hilarious to pass up.
Malkin defines 9/11 truth as a "virus" and repeats the term over and
over to ensure Fox's geriatric 80-plus viewers don't forget it. Malkin
resorts to the usual fodder of smearing 9/11 truth as a leftist fringe
movement, despite the fact that we are routinely shunned and attacked
by the liberal media, both mainstream and alternative.
Gibson and Malkin then recoil at the temerity of the suggestion that
bombing third world countries breeds hatred and characterize it as a
tin-foil hat conspiracy theory!
Of course, those poor people in the Middle East love being bombed and
to suggest otherwise is unpatriotic!
Malkin cites Popular Mechanics, the Hearst Publishing yellow
journalism rag that is edited by a tabloid TV critic as her bastion of
credibility for standing up to 9/11 truthers, despite the fact that
the magazine's 9/11 hit piece has been debunked over and over and is
the target of Professor David Ray Griffin's new book , Debunking 9/11
Debunking.
"I try not to spend too much time in these cesspools," whines Malkin
before attacking Ron Paul for appearing on radio with "9/11 conspiracy
nut Alex Jones," and suggesting that the Texas Congressman should be
kicked out of the debates for doing so.
All this of course stems from Ron Paul's confrontation with Rudy
Giuliani, the supposed "9/11 hero" who had the real heroes - the
firefighters - arrested when they objected to Giuliani's order that
their colleague's remains be scooped up by and dumped in a landfill.
In reality, the supposed "slap-down" Giuliani handed out to Ron Paul
during the debate has returned in the form of the truth to whack him
back in the face tenfold.
Just for argument's sake, let's accept the premise that 9/11 was
orchestrated from a cave and that Osama bin Laden somehow managed to
neutralize the standard air defenses of the United States for the
first time in history.
Both the vaunted 9/11 Commission Report and the CIA admit that U.S.
foreign policy has endangered the U.S.
"The 9-11 Commission report detailed how bin Laden had, in 1996,
issued "his self-styled fatwa calling on Muslims to drive American
soldiers out of Saudi Arabia" and identified that declaration and
another in 1998 as part of "a long series" of statements objecting to
U.S. military interventions in his native Saudi Arabia in particular
and the Middle East in general. Statements from bin Laden and those
associated with him prior to 9-11 consistently expressed anger with
the U.S. military presence on the Arabian Peninsula, U.S. aggression
against the Iraqi people and U.S. support of Israel," reports the
Nation .
In addition, Michael Scheuer, the former Central Intelligence Agency
specialist on bin Laden and al-Qaeda, told CNN that "We're being
attacked for what we do in the Islamic world, not for who we are or
what we believe in or how we live. And there's a huge burden of guilt
to be laid at Mr. Bush, Mr. Clinton, both parties for simply lying to
the American people."
But we'd be naive to think that Fox "News", Gibson and Malkin would
let the facts get in the way of a good childish name-calling smear
job.
Yet Another Fox News Smear Job On Ron Paul, Alex Jones & 9/11 Truth
Malkin, Gibson attack "9/11 conspiracy nut" Alex Jones, say Paul
should be kicked out of debates for appearing on his show, suggest
Middle Easterners enjoy being bombed and to claim otherwise is a tin-
foil hat conspiracy theory
Prison Planet | May 17, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson
Fox "News" anchor John Gibson was joined by diehard Neo-Con Michele
"put every Muslim in a concentration camp" Malkin last night to attack
Ron Paul, Alex Jones and suggest that people in the Middle East enjoy
being bombed and to state otherwise is a tin-foil hat conspiracy
theory.
First of all, Gibson lies outright by claiming Ron Paul said the U.S.
had a hand in the 9/11 attacks, something the Texas Congressman has
never stated. He then brings on Malkin, who remains the poster child
for a dwindling gaggle of Internet Neo-Con blowhards.
Malkin knows which side her bread is buttered on and is perfectly
aware of the fact that Prison Planet alone dwarfs the popularity of
her own measly Neo-Con "Hot Air" blog. She seems to have a dangerous
obsession with attacking us and most of the time we ignore her but
this one was too hilarious to pass up.
Malkin defines 9/11 truth as a "virus" and repeats the term over and
over to ensure Fox's geriatric 80-plus viewers don't forget it. Malkin
resorts to the usual fodder of smearing 9/11 truth as a leftist fringe
movement, despite the fact that we are routinely shunned and attacked
by the liberal media, both mainstream and alternative.
Gibson and Malkin then recoil at the temerity of the suggestion that
bombing third world countries breeds hatred and characterize it as a
tin-foil hat conspiracy theory!
Of course, those poor people in the Middle East love being bombed and
to suggest otherwise is unpatriotic!
Malkin cites Popular Mechanics, the Hearst Publishing yellow
journalism rag that is edited by a tabloid TV critic as her bastion of
credibility for standing up to 9/11 truthers, despite the fact that
the magazine's 9/11 hit piece has been debunked over and over and is
the target of Professor David Ray Griffin's new book , Debunking 9/11
Debunking.
"I try not to spend too much time in these cesspools," whines Malkin
before attacking Ron Paul for appearing on radio with "9/11 conspiracy
nut Alex Jones," and suggesting that the Texas Congressman should be
kicked out of the debates for doing so.
All this of course stems from Ron Paul's confrontation with Rudy
Giuliani, the supposed "9/11 hero" who had the real heroes - the
firefighters - arrested when they objected to Giuliani's order that
their colleague's remains be scooped up by and dumped in a landfill.
In reality, the supposed "slap-down" Giuliani handed out to Ron Paul
during the debate has returned in the form of the truth to whack him
back in the face tenfold.
Just for argument's sake, let's accept the premise that 9/11 was
orchestrated from a cave and that Osama bin Laden somehow managed to
neutralize the standard air defenses of the United States for the
first time in history.
Both the vaunted 9/11 Commission Report and the CIA admit that U.S.
foreign policy has endangered the U.S.
"The 9-11 Commission report detailed how bin Laden had, in 1996,
issued "his self-styled fatwa calling on Muslims to drive American
soldiers out of Saudi Arabia" and identified that declaration and
another in 1998 as part of "a long series" of statements objecting to
U.S. military interventions in his native Saudi Arabia in particular
and the Middle East in general. Statements from bin Laden and those
associated with him prior to 9-11 consistently expressed anger with
the U.S. military presence on the Arabian Peninsula, U.S. aggression
against the Iraqi people and U.S. support of Israel," reports the
Nation .
In addition, Michael Scheuer, the former Central Intelligence Agency
specialist on bin Laden and al-Qaeda, told CNN that "We're being
attacked for what we do in the Islamic world, not for who we are or
what we believe in or how we live. And there's a huge burden of guilt
to be laid at Mr. Bush, Mr. Clinton, both parties for simply lying to
the American people."
But we'd be naive to think that Fox "News", Gibson and Malkin would
let the facts get in the way of a good childish name-calling smear
job.
Ron Paul was asked by CNN if he was going back down or apologize for
stating the fact that people in the Middle East don't enjoy being
bombed. Righteously, the Texas Congressman invited Giuliani to read
the 9/11 Commission Report and apologize himself.
Yet Another Fox News Smear Job On Ron Paul, Alex Jones & 9/11 Truth
Malkin, Gibson attack "9/11 conspiracy nut" Alex Jones, say Paul
should be kicked out of debates for appearing on his show, suggest
Middle Easterners enjoy being bombed and to claim otherwise is a tin-
foil hat conspiracy theory
Prison Planet | May 17, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson
Fox "News" anchor John Gibson was joined by diehard Neo-Con Michele
"put every Muslim in a concentration camp" Malkin last night to attack
Ron Paul, Alex Jones and suggest that people in the Middle East enjoy
being bombed and to state otherwise is a tin-foil hat conspiracy
theory.
First of all, Gibson lies outright by claiming Ron Paul said the U.S.
had a hand in the 9/11 attacks, something the Texas Congressman has
never stated. He then brings on Malkin, who remains the poster child
for a dwindling gaggle of Internet Neo-Con blowhards.
Malkin knows which side her bread is buttered on and is perfectly
aware of the fact that Prison Planet alone dwarfs the popularity of
her own measly Neo-Con "Hot Air" blog. She seems to have a dangerous
obsession with attacking us and most of the time we ignore her but
this one was too hilarious to pass up.
Malkin defines 9/11 truth as a "virus" and repeats the term over and
over to ensure Fox's geriatric 80-plus viewers don't forget it. Malkin
resorts to the usual fodder of smearing 9/11 truth as a leftist fringe
movement, despite the fact that we are routinely shunned and attacked
by the liberal media, both mainstream and alternative.
Gibson and Malkin then recoil at the temerity of the suggestion that
bombing third world countries breeds hatred and characterize it as a
tin-foil hat conspiracy theory!
Of course, those poor people in the Middle East love being bombed and
to suggest otherwise is unpatriotic!
Malkin cites Popular Mechanics, the Hearst Publishing yellow
journalism rag that is edited by a tabloid TV critic as her bastion of
credibility for standing up to 9/11 truthers, despite the fact that
the magazine's 9/11 hit piece has been debunked over and over and is
the target of Professor David Ray Griffin's new book , Debunking 9/11
Debunking.
"I try not to spend too much time in these cesspools," whines Malkin
before attacking Ron Paul for appearing on radio with "9/11 conspiracy
nut Alex Jones," and suggesting that the Texas Congressman should be
kicked out of the debates for doing so.
All this of course stems from Ron Paul's confrontation with Rudy
Giuliani, the supposed "9/11 hero" who had the real heroes - the
firefighters - arrested when they objected to Giuliani's order that
their colleague's remains be scooped up by and dumped in a landfill.
In reality, the supposed "slap-down" Giuliani handed out to Ron Paul
during the debate has returned in the form of the truth to whack him
back in the face tenfold.
Just for argument's sake, let's accept the premise that 9/11 was
orchestrated from a cave and that Osama bin Laden somehow managed to
neutralize the standard air defenses of the United States for the
first time in history.
Both the vaunted 9/11 Commission Report and the CIA admit that U.S.
foreign policy has endangered the U.S.
"The 9-11 Commission report detailed how bin Laden had, in 1996,
issued "his self-styled fatwa calling on Muslims to drive American
soldiers out of Saudi Arabia" and identified that declaration and
another in 1998 as part of "a long series" of statements objecting to
U.S. military interventions in his native Saudi Arabia in particular
and the Middle East in general. Statements from bin Laden and those
associated with him prior to 9-11 consistently expressed anger with
the U.S. military presence on the Arabian Peninsula, U.S. aggression
against the Iraqi people and U.S. support of Israel," reports the
Nation .
In addition, Michael Scheuer, the former Central Intelligence Agency
specialist on bin Laden and al-Qaeda, told CNN that "We're being
attacked for what we do in the Islamic world, not for who we are or
what we believe in or how we live. And there's a huge burden of guilt
to be laid at Mr. Bush, Mr. Clinton, both parties for simply lying to
the American people."
But we'd be naive to think that Fox "News", Gibson and Malkin would
let the facts get in the way of a good childish name-calling smear
job.
Ron Paul was asked by CNN if he was going back down or apologize for
stating the fact that people in the Middle East don't enjoy being
bombed. Righteously, the Texas Congressman invited Giuliani to read
the 9/11 Commission Report and apologize himself.
It is now clearly evident that Tuesday night's debate and its
aftermath was elaborately rigged and directed towards discrediting Ron
Paul and neutralizing the wave of popular support he has received that
has absolutely terrified the establishment. But it's backfired because
more people than ever now know who Ron Paul is and what he stands for.
Once again, we thank Fox News for the continued attention they are
bringing to the 9/11 truth movement - because for any of their viewers
that still possess their own set of teeth, they will be encouraged to
Google terms like "WTC 7" and "Alex Jones" and find out the truth.
We invite Gibson, O'Reilly, Malkin and their ilk to continue their
desperate ad hominem attacks because anyone with two brain cells left
to rub together can immediately deduce how liars and con-artists
behave - and how their impetuous smear tactics are manifested.
.
|
|
| User: "Mike Flannigan" |
|
| Title: Re: LYING neo-con ***** michelle malkin continues her hollow, pathetic attacks on Ron Paul on 9/11 truth |
17 May 2007 07:50:15 PM |
|
|
"AirRaid" <AirRaid1500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179432760.010272.55090@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://tinyurl.com/2o42gc
Yet Another Fox News Smear Job On Ron Paul, Alex Jones & 9/11 Truth
Yes, Ron Paul was right. Clinton caused 9/11.
"Have you ever read about the reasons they attacked us? They attack us
because we've been over there. We've been bombing Iraq for 10 years"
- Ron Paul
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "mimus" |
|
| Title: Re: LYING neo-con ***** michelle malkin continues her hollow, pathetic attacks on Ron Paul on 9/11 truth |
17 May 2007 04:42:52 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:12:40 -0700, AirRaid wrote:
Yet Another Fox News Smear Job On Ron Paul, Alex Jones & 9/11 Truth
Malkin, Gibson attack "9/11 conspiracy nut" Alex Jones, say Paul
should be kicked out of debates for appearing on his show, suggest
Middle Easterners enjoy being bombed and to claim otherwise is a tin-
foil hat conspiracy theory
You've sunk pretty low when you're being attacked by _FauxNews_ as a
right-wing loonie . . . .
--
When was the last time you heard an American politician
use the word "plutocracy"?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Global Warming K00ks Gone Wild again Global Warming k00k @ ELF.org" |
|
| Title: Re: LYING neo-con ***** continues her hollow, pathetic attacks Bush |
17 May 2007 05:44:49 PM |
|
|
Thursday, May 17, 2007
Opponents hammer Clinton on Iraq
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Some of Sen. Hillary Clinton's Democratic presidential
opponents are accusing the New York Democrat of giving contradictory
statements and being intentionally vague about a critically important issue:
her position on Iraq.
Clinton is denying the charge, which stems from conflicting answers about
the meaning of her "yes" vote cast Wednesday on a proposal to cut off
funding for Iraq.
Cutting funding for the Iraq mission is a drastic step towards ending the
war that until now Clinton, as well as two of her opponents for the
Democratic nomination: Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Joe Biden, have opposed.
The Senate vote on Wednesday, which failed, was a so-called "cloture"
motion.
Clinton spokesman Philippe Reines made it clear Wednesday that she supported
both that procedural measure and the underlying bill to choke funding for
Iraq.
But when asked Wednesday afternoon, Clinton would not answer whether she
would support the actual bill.
"I'm not going to speculate what I'll be voting on in the future," she told
reporters, according to the New York Times. That quote was picked up and
circulated by aides to Clinton's Democratic opponents, including Sen.
Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, who earlier this week ran television ads in New
Hampshire and Iowa prodding Clinton and Obama to support cutting off funding
for the war.
"We're as confused as anyone on Sen. Clinton's position, and frankly it's
hard to know whether it's indecision, miscommunication, or simple word games
and political gamesmanship we're dealing with," said Dodd spokeswoman
Christy Setzer. "Our troops in Iraq don't have time for poll-tested word
games."
Knowing they had to try to quash a potential controversy, Clinton's aides
made her available to reporters to try to explain she was "misunderstood,"
and clarify that she would have voted for the bill to cut off funding, if
she had the chance.
"I support the underlying bill," Clinton said, "I mean, that's what this
vote on cloture was all about."
Clinton's position on the war was already fodder for her opponents in a
Democratic contest where opposition to the war is crucial. The New York
senator refuses to say she regrets her 2002 vote to authorize the war, and
has been looking for other ways to speak out against the war. Two weeks ago,
Clinton backed a measure to revoke the president's authorization for war.
"What we're doing is trying to convey as strongly as we can the feelings
that many of us have about the need to change course -- some take a
different course than others and to send a message to the Iraqis. I think
we're doing that, slowly but surely," said Clinton.
-- CNN's Ted Barrett and Dana Bash
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
