| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Unpleasant Truth" |
| Date: |
08 May 2004 03:31:55 PM |
| Object: |
MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Main Entry: con·ser·va·tism
Pronunciation: k&n-'s&r-v&-"ti-z&m
Function: noun
1 capitalized a : the principles and policies of a Conservative party
b : the Conservative party
2 a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established
b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability,
stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual
development to abrupt change
3 : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to
change
www.m-w.com
.
|
|
| User: "John Rackham" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
08 May 2004 05:14:45 PM |
|
|
On 8 May 2004 13:31:55 -0700, (Unpleasant
Truth) wrote:
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life, Liberty and Property.
All of which dedicated leftwingers are in opposition to.
Main Entry: con·ser·va·tism
Pronunciation: k&n-'s&r-v&-"ti-z&m
Function: noun
1 capitalized a : the principles and policies of a Conservative party
b : the Conservative party
2 a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established
b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability,
stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual
development to abrupt change
3 : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to
change
www.m-w.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "studio" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
09 May 2004 10:42:59 AM |
|
|
John Rackham <johnrackham@calico.com> wrote in message news:<jsmq90trbpfv28l3i2fcd9hg85tsf5l5r3@4ax.com>...
On 8 May 2004 13:31:55 -0700, (Unpleasant
Truth) wrote:
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life, Liberty and Property.
All of which dedicated leftwingers are in opposition to.
Well, if there's "basic", there must be "moderate" and "premium" grade
rights also. Could you explain those extra-grade rights to me, and how
to acquire them?
Does it have anything to do with.....now who could it be.....let me
think......hmmmm......SATAN?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr Nasty Mr" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
08 May 2004 06:13:44 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 May 2004 22:14:45 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2004 13:31:55 -0700, (Unpleasant
Truth) wrote:
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life,
Worth ***** all under Bush?
Liberty
but not to have the truth displayed openly under Bush?
Property.
Like destroying or seizing (Oil) under Bush?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
09 May 2004 04:09:32 AM |
|
|
Mr Nasty <Mr Nasty@zambros.com> wrote in message news:<f6qq901nkb06btfk1g5hl28nbongur5184@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 08 May 2004 22:14:45 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
Basic human rights are Life,
Worth ***** all under Bush?
Liberty
but not to have the truth displayed openly under Bush?
Property.
Like destroying or seizing (Oil) under Bush?
Conserva-Clowns dream that there is a basic human right called
owning property (I suppose the dork meant "owning property" and
not simply "property"). They are simply trying to justify their
EXCESSIVE desire for material wealth. Cons are psychologically
extremely insecure, and find the security they seek in money and
property. They don't realize that there are several things which
should be established as basic human rights before PROPERTY. It
would seem that food and clean air/water are higher priorities.
Cons want to HOARD money and property, and they also want the
luxury of making decisions about the lives of other people.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
09 May 2004 10:25:57 AM |
|
|
"Unpleasant Truth" <unpleazant_truth@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2083fd5d.0405090109.5e044ee5@posting.google.com...
Conserva-Clowns dream that there is a basic human right called
owning property (I suppose the dork meant "owning property" and
not simply "property"). They are simply trying to justify their
EXCESSIVE desire for material wealth. Cons are psychologically
extremely insecure, and find the security they seek in money and
property.
I think it's the leftists who demonstrate
insecurity by installing various government
welfare systems so if they fail there are no
consequences.
They don't realize that there are several things which
should be established as basic human rights before PROPERTY. It
would seem that food and clean air/water are higher priorities.
Cons want to HOARD money and property, and they also want the
luxury of making decisions about the lives of other people.
I don't agree with a right to property, but I do
believe we should have the right to own property
once we earn it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
10 May 2004 11:48:29 AM |
|
|
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message news:<K1snc.91063$7a5.3578@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
I think it's the leftists who demonstrate
insecurity by installing various government
welfare systems so if they fail there are no
consequences.
Insecure Conserva-Clowns need to control how people behave
for the sake of SOCIAL STABILITY:
Main Entry: con·ser·va·tism
Pronunciation: k&n-'s&r-v&-"ti-z&m
Function: noun
1 capitalized a : the principles and policies of a Conservative party
b : the Conservative party
2 a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established
b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability,
stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual
development to abrupt change
3 : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to
change
www.m-w.com
According to Cons, the press shouldn't report certain things.
Iraqis shouldn't resist their occupiers. Americans shouldn't
expect George Bush to account for why he has done what he has
done. Everyone should say please and thank you.
The PROBLEM IS THAT CONS don't want to PAY for the
privilege of telling everyone what to do and how to behave.
Cons will argue that total social cooperation should be
voluntary, it benefits us all blah blah blah which is *****
because not everyone is as insecure as Conserva-Sheep are.
I don't agree with a right to property, but I do
believe we should have the right to own property
once we earn it.
We charge our government with protecting god-given rights
on the premise that all men are created equal, i.e., each
of us begins with an equal right to live and to not be
constrained by another. Whether or not god intended you
to have certain property would seem to be another matter.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Rackham" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
08 May 2004 06:19:24 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 8 May 2004 23:13:44 +0000 (UTC), Mr Nasty <Mr
Nasty@zambros.com> wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 22:14:45 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2004 13:31:55 -0700, (Unpleasant
Truth) wrote:
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life,
Worth ***** all under Bush?
Liberty
but not to have the truth displayed openly under Bush?
Property.
Like destroying or seizing (Oil) under Bush?
I'm going to assume that you are a fascist Weasel, right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warren Stupidity" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
08 May 2004 07:12:41 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 May 2004 23:19:24 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2004 23:13:44 +0000 (UTC), Mr Nasty <Mr
Nasty@zambros.com> wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 22:14:45 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2004 13:31:55 -0700, (Unpleasant
Truth) wrote:
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life,
Worth ***** all under Bush?
Liberty
but not to have the truth displayed openly under Bush?
Property.
Like destroying or seizing (Oil) under Bush?
I'm going to assume that you are a fascist Weasel, right?
Besides it is 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'. Reread
the DOI. Oh, and anyone who disagrees with your idiocy is a 'fascist
Weasel', right?
The Washington NeoClowns can't even get their clown
shoes on right, and there is no wrong way to do that.
==
Mark Roddy
"Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event like a
new Pearl Harbor."
-- Project for a New American Century,
-- the neocon cabal's blueprint for world empire.
http://www.newamericancentury.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Rackham" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
09 May 2004 11:49:34 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 May 2004 20:12:41 -0400, Warren Stupidity
<weaselMark@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 23:19:24 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2004 23:13:44 +0000 (UTC), Mr Nasty <Mr
Nasty@zambros.com> wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 22:14:45 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2004 13:31:55 -0700, (Unpleasant
Truth) wrote:
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life,
Worth ***** all under Bush?
Liberty
but not to have the truth displayed openly under Bush?
Property.
Like destroying or seizing (Oil) under Bush?
I'm going to assume that you are a fascist Weasel, right?
Besides it is 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'. Reread
the DOI. Oh, and anyone who disagrees with your idiocy is a 'fascist
Weasel', right?
Anyone who disagrees that humans have a right to Life, Liberty and
Property is probably a fascist Weasel.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mondaymorning" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
09 May 2004 04:00:04 PM |
|
|
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life,
Worth ***** all under Bush?
Your life is being protected. Can't you see that the cancer of terrorism
must be stamped out *NOW*. All over the world the terrorist's strike. What
is their goal? Osama told you that....to kill infidels. Who are infidels?
Anyone who does not believe as they do. This cancer is all over the middle
east. How soon before they bring it to the U.S big time? 9-11 should have
shown us that. Iraq was the next logical target because all we had to do
was have them prove they didn't have WMD's. I believe Saddam thought we
wouldn't follow through (also he had others in his pocket because of oil
deals) but he greatly underestimated Bush. Now a great deal of the
terrorist war is being fought there.
Liberty
but not to have the truth displayed openly under Bush?
Property.
Like destroying or seizing (Oil) under Bush?
I'm going to assume that you are a fascist Weasel, right?
Besides it is 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'. Reread
the DOI. Oh, and anyone who disagrees with your idiocy is a 'fascist
Weasel', right?
Anyone who disagrees that humans have a right to Life, Liberty and
Property is probably a fascist Weasel.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
10 May 2004 12:05:36 PM |
|
|
John Rackham <johnrackham@calico.com> wrote in message news:<65os9052bsim3tf7vdik6ogva7la2e8j5g@4ax.com>...
Anyone who disagrees that humans have a right to Life, Liberty and
Property is probably a fascist Weasel.
Our government was established primarily to secure our
god-given rights. It would seem that god intended each
of us to begin with the equal right to life and to not
be constrained by another. Whether or not god intended
for you to have certain property is questionable.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
09 May 2004 04:15:03 AM |
|
|
Warren Stupidity <weaselMark@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<lptq9057ghq09pr79oknq9nmqkid895u9a@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 08 May 2004 23:19:24 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2004 23:13:44 +0000 (UTC), Mr Nasty <Mr
Nasty@zambros.com> wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 22:14:45 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2004 13:31:55 -0700, (Unpleasant
Truth) wrote:
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life,
Worth ***** all under Bush?
Liberty
but not to have the truth displayed openly under Bush?
Property.
Like destroying or seizing (Oil) under Bush?
I'm going to assume that you are a fascist Weasel, right?
Besides it is 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'. Reread
the DOI. Oh, and anyone who disagrees with your idiocy is a 'fascist
Weasel', right?
Conserva-Clowns dream that there is a basic human right called
owning property (I suppose the dork meant "owning property" and
not simply "property"). They are simply trying to justify their
EXCESSIVE desire for material wealth. Cons are psychologically
extremely insecure, and find the security they seek in money and
property. They don't realize that there are several things which
should be established as basic human rights before PROPERTY. It
would seem that food and clean air/water are higher priorities.
Cons want to HOARD money and property, and they also want the
luxury of making decisions about the lives of other people.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr Nasty Mr" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
08 May 2004 07:45:02 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 May 2004 23:19:24 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2004 23:13:44 +0000 (UTC), Mr Nasty <Mr
Nasty@zambros.com> wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 22:14:45 GMT, John Rackham
<johnrackham@calico.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2004 13:31:55 -0700, (Unpleasant
Truth) wrote:
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life,
Worth ***** all under Bush?
Liberty
but not to have the truth displayed openly under Bush?
Property.
Like destroying or seizing (Oil) under Bush?
I'm going to assume that you are a fascist Weasel, right?
No, your probably wrong as usual . Fascist want to hide the truth. Why
should the truth be covered up? Lies need covering up - the truth
needs to be seen.
You think Bush gives a ***** how many Americans or Iraqis are killed as
long as they're not relatives of his?
You think Bush gives a ***** about atrocities rather than the fact that
it's bad PR?
C'mon, wake up and get real. Don't spend your life with your head up
your *****. He'll happily send you there tomorrow if needed. You are on
the internet, try and use to learn something other than what comes out
your television.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Unpleasant Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO UNDERSTAND |
08 May 2004 08:28:43 PM |
|
|
You appear to have an anger problem.
John Rackham <johnrackham@calico.com> wrote in message news:<jsmq90trbpfv28l3i2fcd9hg85tsf5l5r3@4ax.com>...
On 8 May 2004 13:31:55 -0700, (Unpleasant
Truth) wrote:
basic human rights. Too many insecure Americans will not hesitate
to interfere with the basic rights of others for the sake of
SOCIAL STABILITY.
Basic human rights are Life, Liberty and Property.
All of which dedicated leftwingers are in opposition to.
Main Entry: con·ser·va·tism
Pronunciation: k&n-'s&r-v&-"ti-z&m
Function: noun
1 capitalized a : the principles and policies of a Conservative party
b : the Conservative party
2 a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established
b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability,
stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual
development to abrupt change
3 : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to
change
www.m-w.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
