| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"MioMyo" |
| Date: |
03 Jul 2007 08:10:35 AM |
| Object: |
Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines about justice
and the rule of law when they defended to the nth degree their
ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these noble
liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not pardoned him)
because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are foaming at the
mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended Clinton when he
Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo paying Willy
millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
And of course none of this is to mention that Libby was NEVER convicted of
outing Plame (the real charge) which Liberals to this day still claim is
fact!
Please keep up the squeals libs; I enjoy your pain!
http://www.time.com/time/2007/presidential_pardons/10.html
.
|
|
| User: "Joe Steel" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
03 Jul 2007 10:19:53 AM |
|
|
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in
news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines about
justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth degree their
ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these noble
liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not pardoned him)
because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are foaming at
the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended Clinton
when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo paying
Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs investigation into
an act of TREASON.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
03 Jul 2007 08:01:45 PM |
|
|
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com> wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not pardoned him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are foaming at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not removed
from office, that's all!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
03 Jul 2007 08:52:48 PM |
|
|
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com> wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury. It was just one of the
many charges thrown against him that failed.
Game, set, match.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
03 Jul 2007 09:44:04 PM |
|
|
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com> wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury. It was just one of the
many charges thrown against him that failed.
Game, set, match.
Learn how the Constitution works kimmey. A sitting president, although is
not above the law, is dealt with differently under the constitution. He must
first be impeached by the house and then removed from office by the senate.
Some claim removal = conviction and then declare failure to remove by the
senate absolves impeachment in the house. It does not and Clinton will
forever remain impeached. Enjoy!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 05:02:42 AM |
|
|
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:UPDii.37444$Um6.19282@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com>
wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines
about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are
foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY
elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury. It was just one of the
many charges thrown against him that failed.
Game, set, match.
Learn how the Constitution works kimmey.
Pretty funny coming from an ignormus like you.
A sitting president, although is
not above the law, is dealt with differently under the constitution. He
must
first be impeached by the house and then removed from office by the
senate.
Some claim removal = conviction and then declare failure to remove by the
senate absolves impeachment in the house. It does not and Clinton will
forever remain impeached. Enjoy!
Wow, are you REALLY that stupid? Impeached = accused. The House made
accusations agaisnt Clinton. The Senate did not convict on EITHER charge.
History records that Clinton was *acquitted* and *exonerated* on the
impeachment charges, while the Republicans ended up looking pathetic and
riduculous.
Today Bill Clinton is one of the most beloved former presidents of modern
times, while George Bush has already surpassed Jimmy Carter in pariah status
and is now in Nixon territory.
Enjoy, wingnut!
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 07:38:35 AM |
|
|
I realize that you're regurgitating the left's spun tripe, but I prefer
sticking with the Constitution and to your chagrin Clinton will remain
forever impeached. Enjoy that fact lib!
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:xP2dnefadun06RbbnZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:UPDii.37444$Um6.19282@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com>
wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com>
wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines
about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth
degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not
pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are
foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY
elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury. It was just one of
the
many charges thrown against him that failed.
Game, set, match.
Learn how the Constitution works kimmey.
Pretty funny coming from an ignormus like you.
A sitting president, although is
not above the law, is dealt with differently under the constitution. He
must
first be impeached by the house and then removed from office by the
senate.
Some claim removal = conviction and then declare failure to remove by the
senate absolves impeachment in the house. It does not and Clinton will
forever remain impeached. Enjoy!
Wow, are you REALLY that stupid? Impeached = accused. The House made
accusations agaisnt Clinton. The Senate did not convict on EITHER charge.
History records that Clinton was *acquitted* and *exonerated* on the
impeachment charges, while the Republicans ended up looking pathetic and
riduculous.
Today Bill Clinton is one of the most beloved former presidents of modern
times, while George Bush has already surpassed Jimmy Carter in pariah
status
and is now in Nixon territory.
Enjoy, wingnut!
50-years from now will give a better perspective since most of you left-wing
nuts will be gone by then. So in your death, history will be what it will
be, not what you say today it will be.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 12:24:06 PM |
|
|
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:fxMii.20514$RX.19576@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
I realize that you're regurgitating the left's spun tripe, but I prefer
sticking with the Constitution and to your chagrin Clinton will remain
forever impeached. Enjoy that fact lib!
Since you are wholly ignorant of the Constittuion you can remain the buffoon
forever, while Clinton remains completely acquitted and exonerated.
That's the plain unvarnished truth, and it just KILLS you, doesn't it?
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:xP2dnefadun06RbbnZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:UPDii.37444$Um6.19282@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com>
wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com>
wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines
about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth
degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all
these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not
pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are
foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose
Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY
elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury. It was just one of
the
many charges thrown against him that failed.
Game, set, match.
Learn how the Constitution works kimmey.
Pretty funny coming from an ignormus like you.
A sitting president, although is
not above the law, is dealt with differently under the constitution. He
must
first be impeached by the house and then removed from office by the
senate.
Some claim removal = conviction and then declare failure to remove by
the
senate absolves impeachment in the house. It does not and Clinton will
forever remain impeached. Enjoy!
Wow, are you REALLY that stupid? Impeached = accused. The House made
accusations agaisnt Clinton. The Senate did not convict on EITHER
charge.
History records that Clinton was *acquitted* and *exonerated* on the
impeachment charges, while the Republicans ended up looking pathetic and
riduculous.
Today Bill Clinton is one of the most beloved former presidents of
modern
times, while George Bush has already surpassed Jimmy Carter in pariah
status
and is now in Nixon territory.
Enjoy, wingnut!
50-years from now will give a better perspective since most of you
left-wing
nuts will be gone by then. So in your death, history will be what it will
be, not what you say today it will be.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John S." |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 07:47:50 AM |
|
|
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:fxMii.20514$RX.19576@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
I realize that you're regurgitating the left's spun tripe, but I prefer
sticking with the Constitution and to your chagrin Clinton will remain
forever impeached. Enjoy that fact lib!
And judged NOT GUILTY by the Senate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "hopeful" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 07:55:39 AM |
|
|
"John S." <John_S@________.___> wrote in message
news:YFMii.7392$g6.1231@newsfe18.lga...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:fxMii.20514$RX.19576@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
I realize that you're regurgitating the left's spun tripe, but I prefer
sticking with the Constitution and to your chagrin Clinton will remain
forever impeached. Enjoy that fact lib!
And judged NOT GUILTY by the Senate.
Both actions by these Presidents are allowed by the Constitution. Neither
were the right thing to do but they were legal. If the American people do
not like the actions of President Bush they should take out their
displeasure on the legislatures, as in voting out the party members. Sadly
that will never happen and if it would what would be voted in would be no
better. All of them are owned by robber barons and the zionist agents
running this country.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John S." |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 07:48:40 AM |
|
|
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:fxMii.20514$RX.19576@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
I realize that you're regurgitating the left's spun tripe, but I prefer
sticking with the Constitution and to your chagrin Clinton will remain
forever impeached. Enjoy that fact lib!
And judged NOT GUILTY by the Senate.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 10:08:05 AM |
|
|
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:fxMii.20514$RX.19576@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
I realize that you're regurgitating the left's spun tripe, but I prefer
sticking with the Constitution and to your chagrin Clinton will remain
forever impeached. Enjoy that fact lib!
What constitution are you talking about? Our provides a democratic society,
our provides for the rule of law. Bush has never support those principles.
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:xP2dnefadun06RbbnZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:UPDii.37444$Um6.19282@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com>
wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com>
wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines
about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth
degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not
pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are
foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose
Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY
elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury. It was just one of
the
many charges thrown against him that failed.
Game, set, match.
Learn how the Constitution works kimmey.
Pretty funny coming from an ignormus like you.
A sitting president, although is
not above the law, is dealt with differently under the constitution. He
must
first be impeached by the house and then removed from office by the
senate.
Some claim removal = conviction and then declare failure to remove by
the
senate absolves impeachment in the house. It does not and Clinton will
forever remain impeached. Enjoy!
Wow, are you REALLY that stupid? Impeached = accused. The House made
accusations agaisnt Clinton. The Senate did not convict on EITHER
charge.
History records that Clinton was *acquitted* and *exonerated* on the
impeachment charges, while the Republicans ended up looking pathetic and
riduculous.
Today Bill Clinton is one of the most beloved former presidents of modern
times, while George Bush has already surpassed Jimmy Carter in pariah
status
and is now in Nixon territory.
Enjoy, wingnut!
50-years from now will give a better perspective since most of you
left-wing nuts will be gone by then. So in your death, history will be
what it will be, not what you say today it will be.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 06:56:01 PM |
|
|
Enjoy the fact Clinton is still more loved by the American people then your
president ever was.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:fxMii.20514$RX.19576@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
I realize that you're regurgitating the left's spun tripe, but I prefer
sticking with the Constitution and to your chagrin Clinton will remain
forever impeached. Enjoy that fact lib!
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:xP2dnefadun06RbbnZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:UPDii.37444$Um6.19282@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com>
wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com>
wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines
about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth
degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all
these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not
pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are
foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose
Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY
elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury. It was just one of
the
many charges thrown against him that failed.
Game, set, match.
Learn how the Constitution works kimmey.
Pretty funny coming from an ignormus like you.
A sitting president, although is
not above the law, is dealt with differently under the constitution. He
must
first be impeached by the house and then removed from office by the
senate.
Some claim removal = conviction and then declare failure to remove by
the
senate absolves impeachment in the house. It does not and Clinton will
forever remain impeached. Enjoy!
Wow, are you REALLY that stupid? Impeached = accused. The House made
accusations agaisnt Clinton. The Senate did not convict on EITHER
charge.
History records that Clinton was *acquitted* and *exonerated* on the
impeachment charges, while the Republicans ended up looking pathetic and
riduculous.
Today Bill Clinton is one of the most beloved former presidents of
modern
times, while George Bush has already surpassed Jimmy Carter in pariah
status
and is now in Nixon territory.
Enjoy, wingnut!
50-years from now will give a better perspective since most of you
left-wing
nuts will be gone by then. So in your death, history will be what it will
be, not what you say today it will be.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
05 Jul 2007 06:48:47 AM |
|
|
I understand you have emotional needs lib. For myself, I don't want to love
a president. I want a president who is good for the country. On that score
Bush surpasses willy in all measures!
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:zMCdnTeqvqsVrhHbnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@comcast.com...
Enjoy the fact Clinton is still more loved by the American people then
your
president ever was.
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:fxMii.20514$RX.19576@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
I realize that you're regurgitating the left's spun tripe, but I prefer
sticking with the Constitution and to your chagrin Clinton will remain
forever impeached. Enjoy that fact lib!
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:xP2dnefadun06RbbnZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:UPDii.37444$Um6.19282@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com>
wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com>
wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines
about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth
degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all
these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not
pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are
foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals
defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose
Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY
elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury. It was just one of
the
many charges thrown against him that failed.
Game, set, match.
Learn how the Constitution works kimmey.
Pretty funny coming from an ignormus like you.
A sitting president, although is
not above the law, is dealt with differently under the constitution.
He
must
first be impeached by the house and then removed from office by the
senate.
Some claim removal = conviction and then declare failure to remove by
the
senate absolves impeachment in the house. It does not and Clinton will
forever remain impeached. Enjoy!
Wow, are you REALLY that stupid? Impeached = accused. The House made
accusations agaisnt Clinton. The Senate did not convict on EITHER
charge.
History records that Clinton was *acquitted* and *exonerated* on the
impeachment charges, while the Republicans ended up looking pathetic
and
riduculous.
Today Bill Clinton is one of the most beloved former presidents of
modern
times, while George Bush has already surpassed Jimmy Carter in pariah
status
and is now in Nixon territory.
Enjoy, wingnut!
50-years from now will give a better perspective since most of you
left-wing
nuts will be gone by then. So in your death, history will be what it will
be, not what you say today it will be.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
05 Jul 2007 07:22:50 AM |
|
|
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:zU4ji.37636$Um6.8786@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
I understand you have emotional needs lib. For myself, I don't want to
love
a president. I want a president who is good for the country. On that score
Bush surpasses willy in all measures!
Yes if, like you, one supports America's enemies.
Those of us who actually love America understand how much better off we were
went Bill Clinton was in the White House, and how hard it will be to clean
up the damage Cheney and his pet Bush are leaving in their wakes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
05 Jul 2007 07:16:07 PM |
|
|
You do paraphrase the mike moore perspective quite well lib!
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:ip6dnUD0Tr-reRHbnZ2dnUVZ_ubinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:zU4ji.37636$Um6.8786@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
I understand you have emotional needs lib. For myself, I don't want to
love
a president. I want a president who is good for the country. On that
score
Bush surpasses willy in all measures!
Yes if, like you, one supports America's enemies.
Those of us who actually love America understand how much better off we
were
went Bill Clinton was in the White House, and how hard it will be to clean
up the damage Cheney and his pet Bush are leaving in their wakes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
05 Jul 2007 10:49:13 PM |
|
|
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:bRfji.45337$5j1.16070@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
You do paraphrase the mike moore perspective quite well lib!
It's called the *American* perspecive. If you don't like it here, why don't
you go back where you came from?
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:ip6dnUD0Tr-reRHbnZ2dnUVZ_ubinZ2d@rcn.net...
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:zU4ji.37636$Um6.8786@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
I understand you have emotional needs lib. For myself, I don't want to
love
a president. I want a president who is good for the country. On that
score
Bush surpasses willy in all measures!
Yes if, like you, one supports America's enemies.
Those of us who actually love America understand how much better off we
were
went Bill Clinton was in the White House, and how hard it will be to
clean
up the damage Cheney and his pet Bush are leaving in their wakes.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harold Burton" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
03 Jul 2007 09:29:38 PM |
|
|
In article <g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net>,
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote:
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com> wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury.
And President Bush was never "convicted" of being AWOL, so when are you
leftards going to give that a rest? Gawd, gotta love your hypocrisy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 10:05:17 AM |
|
|
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-EFA66E.22293803072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net>,
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote:
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com>
wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines
about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are
foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY
elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury.
And President Bush was never "convicted" of being AWOL, so when are you
leftards going to give that a rest? Gawd, gotta love your hypocrisy.
Heck to put it bluntly he was never in the Armed Forces. He never served.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MioMyo" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 10:33:07 AM |
|
|
And the tooth fairy really did come knock your teeth out and left behind
nothing including inside your noggin!
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjv@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:NGOii.3509$Od7.2871@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-EFA66E.22293803072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net>,
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote:
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com>
wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com>
wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines
about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth
degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not
pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are
foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY
elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury.
And President Bush was never "convicted" of being AWOL, so when are you
leftards going to give that a rest? Gawd, gotta love your hypocrisy.
Heck to put it bluntly he was never in the Armed Forces. He never served.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 06:53:37 PM |
|
|
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat and watched?
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-EFA66E.22293803072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <g6OdnUWByMXtYxfbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@rcn.net>,
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote:
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:RjCii.24970$C96.15004@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"Matt" <matttelles@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1183496340.608260.291450@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 3, 1:25 pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com>
wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Joe Steel <JoeSt...@nospam.com>
wrote:
: "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote in
:news:cVrii.367$m%.328@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net:
: > I for one am completely enjoying listening to liberal whines
about
: > justice and the rule of law when they defended to the nth
degree
their
: > ex-Liar_N_chief's obstruction of justice. Where were all these
noble
: > liberals who cared about the rule of law then?
: >
: > Now that Bush has commuted Libby's sentence (though not
pardoned
him)
: > because Bush said Libby must be accountable, liberals are
foaming
at
: > the mouth. The completely laughable part is Liberals defended
Clinton
: > when he Pardoned Marc Rich (a real criminal) whose Quid-Pro-Quo
paying
: > Willy millions for his library doesn't phase them one iota!
: >
: Perjury is a REAL crime and it's worse when it obstructs
investigation
into
: an act of TREASON.
Unless a dem president does it. Then it's no big deal.
I see. So, the President of the United States, who was REALLY
elected,
faced impeachment, was found innocent, and that's no big deal.
Yeah, you matter. Bye.
Matt
He was never found innocent of Perjury you moron. He was merely not
removed
from office, that's all!
Hey, dummy, he was never *convicted* of perjury.
And President Bush was never "convicted" of being AWOL, so when are you
leftards going to give that a rest? Gawd, gotta love your hypocrisy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harold Burton" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 07:56:00 PM |
|
|
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat and watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the "winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
<snicker>
.
|
|
|
| User: "John S" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 08:36:07 PM |
|
|
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-32DF35.20560004072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat and
watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the "winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
Just who is "your president" - surely you can't be referring to baby bush.
He hasn't run the show even one day since he was awarded the presidency.
<snicker>
Lay off them, they're fattening - you don't want to look like *****, do you ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harold Burton" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
04 Jul 2007 08:59:47 PM |
|
|
In article <hWXii.13053$aJ1.5568@newsfe17.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-32DF35.20560004072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat and
watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the "winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
Just who is "your president"
Heheheh, looks like I struck a nerve. hehehehehe.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John S" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
05 Jul 2007 07:30:02 PM |
|
|
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-555262.21594704072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <hWXii.13053$aJ1.5568@newsfe17.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-32DF35.20560004072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat and
watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the "winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
Just who is "your president"
Heheheh, looks like I struck a nerve. hehehehehe.
Nope, I'm just wondering why you refer to him as "your president", like he's
not anyone else's. And, in today's day and age, bragging about bush being
"your president" makes you look like a fool.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harold Burton" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
05 Jul 2007 08:06:59 PM |
|
|
In article <p2gji.1146$oV4.890@newsfe14.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-555262.21594704072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <hWXii.13053$aJ1.5568@newsfe17.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-32DF35.20560004072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat and
watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the "winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
Just who is "your president"
Heheheh, looks like I struck a nerve. hehehehehe.
Nope, I'm just wondering why you refer to him as "your president"
I didn't, that was John S's term. Ask him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John S" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
05 Jul 2007 09:38:26 PM |
|
|
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-BD796F.21065905072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <p2gji.1146$oV4.890@newsfe14.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-555262.21594704072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <hWXii.13053$aJ1.5568@newsfe17.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-32DF35.20560004072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat and
watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the
"winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
Just who is "your president"
Heheheh, looks like I struck a nerve. hehehehehe.
Nope, I'm just wondering why you refer to him as "your president"
I didn't, that was John S's term. Ask him.
Are you totalling insane? YOU called the idiot in the white house "My
president", not me. Can't you remember from one day to the next?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harold Burton" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
06 Jul 2007 05:32:18 AM |
|
|
In article <OWhji.14$Oz7.13@newsfe19.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-BD796F.21065905072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <p2gji.1146$oV4.890@newsfe14.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-555262.21594704072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <hWXii.13053$aJ1.5568@newsfe17.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-32DF35.20560004072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat and
watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the
"winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
Just who is "your president"
Heheheh, looks like I struck a nerve. hehehehehe.
Nope, I'm just wondering why you refer to him as "your president"
I didn't, that was John S's term. Ask him.
Are you totalling (sic) insane? YOU called the idiot in the white house "My
president", not me. Can't you remember from one day to the next?
Are you totally insane? Do you not understand what " " are for?
.
|
|
|
| User: "John S" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
06 Jul 2007 06:05:56 PM |
|
|
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-9CCFF9.06321806072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <OWhji.14$Oz7.13@newsfe19.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-BD796F.21065905072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <p2gji.1146$oV4.890@newsfe14.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-555262.21594704072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <hWXii.13053$aJ1.5568@newsfe17.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-32DF35.20560004072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat
and
watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the
"winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
Just who is "your president"
Heheheh, looks like I struck a nerve. hehehehehe.
Nope, I'm just wondering why you refer to him as "your president"
I didn't, that was John S's term. Ask him.
Are you totalling (sic) insane? YOU called the idiot in the white house
"My
president", not me. Can't you remember from one day to the next?
Are you totally insane? Do you not understand what " " are for?
Certainly do. The fact is you called bush "your president" and now, caught
lambasting ME as though I said it, you're making excuses and redefining your
own statement.
Why?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harold Burton" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
06 Jul 2007 07:39:42 PM |
|
|
In article <GVzji.648$Sb4.347@newsfe21.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-9CCFF9.06321806072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <OWhji.14$Oz7.13@newsfe19.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-BD796F.21065905072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <p2gji.1146$oV4.890@newsfe14.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-555262.21594704072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <hWXii.13053$aJ1.5568@newsfe17.lga>,
"John S" <John_S@________.___> wrote:
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-32DF35.20560004072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat
and
watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the
"winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
Just who is "your president"
Heheheh, looks like I struck a nerve. hehehehehe.
Nope, I'm just wondering why you refer to him as "your president"
I didn't, that was John S's term. Ask him.
Are you totalling (sic) insane? YOU called the idiot in the white house
"My
president", not me. Can't you remember from one day to the next?
Are you totally insane? Do you not understand what " " are for?
Certainly do. The fact is you called bush "your president" and now, caught
lambasting ME as though I said it, you're making excuses and redefining your
own statement.
Why?
Because you haven't a clue. You must be a leftard.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Marc Rich Pardon Verses Scooter Libby's commutation |
05 Jul 2007 10:15:45 PM |
|
|
How did your president fare as the leader of the party in Nov. 2006?
(snicker)
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-32DF35.20560004072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <r7Kdnfj8od9qrxHbnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote:
Do you love how we f*cked your president's skull while you sat and
watched?
Must be why "my president" is still running the show and the "winners"
of the 2006 election are still whining. Love it.
<snicker>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
