Moonie Washington Times magazine blasted Bush spying



 Politics > Politics-USA > Moonie Washington Times magazine blasted Bush spying

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 09 Feb 2006 02:43:30 PM
Object: Moonie Washington Times magazine blasted Bush spying
http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/02/wash-times-1-bush-is-spying-on.html
Wash Times:
1) Bush is spying on American-American phone calls IN THE US;
2) Known Al Qaeda agents are running free inside US;
3) Spy program useless
by John in DC
2/09/2006
It's hard to overstate the significance of this article in the
Washington Times' magazine.
http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/wiretaps_0.htm
1) The article makes clear that Bush is spying on Americans talking to
Americans inside the United States, even when neither of the two
Americans are members of Al Qaeda or an affiliate.
That totally contradicts what Attorney General Gonzales told Congress
this past week, and what the president has been saying for over a
month - namely, that the ONLY phone calls being tapped are ones with
one party abroad and one party being a member or agent of Al Qaeda.
The sources provided guidelines to how the administration has employed
the surveillance program.
They said the National Security Agency in cooperation with the FBI was
allowed to monitor the telephone calls and e-mails of any American
believed to be in contact with a person abroad suspected of being
linked to al Qaeda or other terrorist groups.
At that point, the sources said, all of the communications of that
American would be monitored, including calls made to others in the
United States.
The regulations under the administration's surveillance program do not
require any court order.
2) The article makes clear that Bush's domestic spy program is totally
ineffective and unnecessary as Al Qaeda stopped using the phones and
email a long time ago.
The Bush administration's surveillance policy has failed to make a
dent in the war against al Qaeda.
U.S. law enforcement sources said that more than four years of
surveillance by the National Security Agency has failed to capture any
high-level al Qaeda operative in the United States.
They said al Qaeda insurgents have long stopped using the phones and
even computers to relay messages. Instead, they employ couriers.
"They have been way ahead of us in communications security," a law
enforcement source said.
"At most, we have caught some riff-raff. But the heavies remain free
and we believe some of them are in the United States."....
The assertions by the law enforcement sources dispute President Bush's
claim that the government surveillance program has significantly
helped in the fight against terrorism.
The president said the program, which goes beyond the 1978 Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act, limits eavesdropping to international
phone calls.
3) The article says that the Bush teams knows of specific Al Qaeda
members in the US at the moment, but because of Bush's incompetence he
has been unable to find them.
The law enforcement sources said the intelligence community has
identified several al Qaeda agents believed to be in the United
States.
But the sources said the agents have not been found because of
insufficient intelligence and even poor analysis.
Rush Limbaugh, FOX News, the right-wing blogs, and the rest of the
Republican cheerleading team can all huff and puff as much as they
want to defend this president for their own partisan political
reasons, but his incompetence is putting our lives, and our way of
life, at risk more and more each day.
And all the Republicans who voted for Bush can play politics all they
want in an effort to cover Bush's *****, but we're talking about our
lives here and our future.
You voted for this man.
Now do something about it.
__________________________________________________
Absolutely shocking!
Harry
.

User: "Billy"

Title: Re:HARRY LIES AGAIN 09 Feb 2006 08:32:18 PM
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:nbanu112sh42qsaeimf749l7d03k3h5kp0@4ax.com...


It's hard to overstate the significance of this article in the
Washington Times' magazine.

What Washington Times' magazine? Insite is no more a part of Washington
Times than the Philadelphia Golf Monthly
.
User: "Harry Krause"

Title: Re: HARRY LIES AGAIN 09 Feb 2006 08:36:51 PM
Billy wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:nbanu112sh42qsaeimf749l7d03k3h5kp0@4ax.com...

It's hard to overstate the significance of this article in the
Washington Times' magazine.


What Washington Times' magazine? Insite is no more a part of Washington
Times than the Philadelphia Golf Monthly


Insignt magazine is a conservative magazine published by the Washington
Times, crap-for-brains.
.
User: "Billy"

Title: Re: HARRY LIES AGAIN 09 Feb 2006 08:43:30 PM
"Harry Krause" <harry.krause@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0e-dnbKH5fqjYXbeRVn-vw@comcast.com...

Billy wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:nbanu112sh42qsaeimf749l7d03k3h5kp0@4ax.com...

It's hard to overstate the significance of this article in the
Washington Times' magazine.


What Washington Times' magazine? Insite is no more a part of Washington
Times than the Philadelphia Golf Monthly



Insignt magazine is a conservative magazine published by the Washington
Times, crap-for-brains.

No it's not liar it is published by News World Communications who publishes
several papers including the Washington times and the Philadelphia Golf
Monthly. Why do you think Harry felt he had to lie if it is so conservative?
.
User: ""

Title: Re: HARRY LIES AGAIN 10 Feb 2006 09:23:05 AM
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 18:43:30 -0800, "Billy"
<nevermind@cox.net> wrote:


"Harry Krause" <harry.krause@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0e-dnbKH5fqjYXbeRVn-vw@comcast.com...

Billy wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:nbanu112sh42qsaeimf749l7d03k3h5kp0@4ax.com...

It's hard to overstate the significance of this article in the
Washington Times' magazine.


What Washington Times' magazine? Insite is no more a part of Washington
Times than the Philadelphia Golf Monthly



Insignt magazine is a conservative magazine published by the Washington
Times, crap-for-brains.


No it's not liar it is published by News World Communications

Who owns News World Communications?
Mickey Mouse?
.


User: "Lamont Cranston"

Title: Re: HARRY LIES AGAIN 10 Feb 2006 09:17:07 AM
Harry Krause wrote:

Billy wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:nbanu112sh42qsaeimf749l7d03k3h5kp0@4ax.com...

It's hard to overstate the significance of this article in the
Washington Times' magazine.



What Washington Times' magazine? Insite is no more a part of
Washington Times than the Philadelphia Golf Monthly



Insignt magazine is a conservative magazine published by the Washington
Times, crap-for-brains.

Good ol' Billy of the Double D platoon -- Dumber than Dogshit.
.
User: "Billy"

Title: Re: HARRY LIES AGAIN 10 Feb 2006 10:32:29 AM
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont@TheShadow.com> wrote in message
news:T72Hf.1668$Ql1.335@chiapp18.algx.net...

Harry Krause wrote:

Billy wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:nbanu112sh42qsaeimf749l7d03k3h5kp0@4ax.com...

It's hard to overstate the significance of this article in the
Washington Times' magazine.



What Washington Times' magazine? Insite is no more a part of Washington
Times than the Philadelphia Golf Monthly



Insignt magazine is a conservative magazine published by the Washington
Times, crap-for-brains.



Good ol' Billy of the Double D platoon -- Dumber than Dogshit.

No I'm not a democrat, I also know Washington Times does not own Insight.
.



User: ""

Title: Re: HARRY LIES AGAIN 10 Feb 2006 09:22:28 AM
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 18:32:18 -0800, "Billy"
<nevermind@cox.net> wrote:


"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:nbanu112sh42qsaeimf749l7d03k3h5kp0@4ax.com...


It's hard to overstate the significance of this article in the
Washington Times' magazine.


What Washington Times' magazine? Insite is no more a part of Washington
Times than the Philadelphia Golf Monthly

You mean it's not a part of your favorite cult leaders
empire?


.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Spying at the UN [March 3/4, 2003]
Israel First Loyalty, Thousands Spying for Israel, Neo-Cons ExposeCIA Agent Name to Punish American Who Exposed Israel Uranium Hoax
Ex-NSA chief, Kindasleazy Rice, defends her secret spying on Americans
Busholini on the hot seat for domestic spying.
What Congressmen were Briefed on US Spying?
If Bush is already spying on his own citizens, then why does he need the Patriot Act? Alternatively, if he's already spying on his own citizens, how can he be trusted with the Patriot Act?
GOP and Dem. Senators call for investigation of Bush spying
Officials Fault Case Bush Cited as Excuse for Spying
NSA Spying Broader Than Bush Admitted
Officials Want to Expand Review of Domestic Spying - New York Times
We now know Bush authorized massive illegal spying operations
Here's Why Bush’s Warrantless Spying Programs Puts Americans At Risk
Bush's domestic spying "conflicts with existing law and hinges on weak legal arguments."
Gonzales to Testify on domestic spying
Specter: If Bush Broke The Law With Warrantless Spying, Impeachment Is A Remedy.
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER