Of course we all know, as this is what liberals always mean when they call
for bipartisanship, is that anyone who opposes her/dems onerous
ideology/agenda must just shut up.

She can call the President any name she wants just as she has been doing
for years now. The fact remains though, that she just recently (earlier
this month) called for civility and bipartisanship, and also that she
would usher in a new era where her congress would be the most ethical &
honorable one in the history of the country. Of course we all know, as
this is what liberals always mean when they call for bipartisanship, is
that anyone who opposes her/dems onerous ideology/agenda must just shut
up. It also means the Imperial Princess Pelosi and her cronies have no
intention themselves of being civil and/or stopping the name calling. To
bad cause the pendulum swing both ways. So once again she lied and I
called her on it, and I'm glad that pisses you radical leftist morons off!

Thanks for proving my point and admitting your democrat hypocrites have
been lying all along!

"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45b316c4$0$8943$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

Bush sends Americans to die.

Pelosi calls him on it.

You blame Pelosi.


"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:c%psh.68716$wP1.29412@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...

The Imperial Princess Pelosi once again exemplifies how she speaks with
forked tongue by saying she would drum in a new era of Bi-Partisanship
( a case of please don't pay attention to what the man behind the
curtain is doing). And of course the fringe left will always fall for
anything the Imperial Princess tells them to believe since they have
never bee an ilk to think for themselves, much less employ critical
thinking skills.

Maybe if Princess Pelosi just promoted substantive legislation regarding
Iraq which reflects her true convictions like defunding the war (if that
is what she believes) instead of Paper-Tiger ***** and cut the word
war crap, she'd get the respect of her anointed speakership. However,
the hypocrite Imperial Princess would rather say she is being
Bi-Partisan while waging her poisonous comments of Bush, who actually
promotes his policy without character assassination of democrats.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070119/pl_nm/iraq_usa_dc_4

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Intensifying a war of words over a U.S. troop
buildup in Iraq, House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused
President George W. Bush on Friday of playing politics with soldiers'
lives, a charge the White House called "poisonous."

"The president knows that because the troops are in harm's way that we
won't cut off the resources," Pelosi, head of the Democratic-led House,
told ABC's "Good Morning America. "That's why he's moving so quickly to
put them in harm's way."
Saying Democrats were waging a "sound-bite war," White House spokeswoman
Dana Perino fired back: "Questioning the president's motivations and
suggesting that he for some political reason is rushing troops into
harm's way is not appropriate, it is not correct and it is unfortunate."
The bitter exchange marked an escalation in the political fight over
Bush's plan, unveiled last week to a skeptical public, to send 21,500
more troops to Iraq as part of a reworked war strategy.

She can call the President any name she wants just as she has been doing
for years now. The fact remains though, that she just recently (earlier
this month) called for civility and bipartisanship, and also that she
would usher in a new era where her congress would be the most ethical &
honorable one in the history of the country. Of course we all know, as
this is what liberals always mean when they call for bipartisanship, is
that anyone who opposes her/dems onerous ideology/agenda must just shut
up. It also means the Imperial Princess Pelosi and her cronies have no
intention themselves of being civil and/or stopping the name calling. To
bad cause the pendulum swing both ways. So once again she lied and I
called her on it, and I'm glad that pisses you radical leftist morons off!

Thanks for proving my point and admitting your democrat hypocrites have
been lying all along!

"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45b316c4$0$8943$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

Bush sends Americans to die.

Pelosi calls him on it.

You blame Pelosi.


"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:c%psh.68716$wP1.29412@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...

The Imperial Princess Pelosi once again exemplifies how she speaks with
forked tongue by saying she would drum in a new era of Bi-Partisanship
( a case of please don't pay attention to what the man behind the
curtain is doing). And of course the fringe left will always fall for
anything the Imperial Princess tells them to believe since they have
never bee an ilk to think for themselves, much less employ critical
thinking skills.

Maybe if Princess Pelosi just promoted substantive legislation regarding
Iraq which reflects her true convictions like defunding the war (if that
is what she believes) instead of Paper-Tiger ***** and cut the word
war crap, she'd get the respect of her anointed speakership. However,
the hypocrite Imperial Princess would rather say she is being
Bi-Partisan while waging her poisonous comments of Bush, who actually
promotes his policy without character assassination of democrats.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070119/pl_nm/iraq_usa_dc_4

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Intensifying a war of words over a U.S. troop
buildup in Iraq, House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused
President George W. Bush on Friday of playing politics with soldiers'
lives, a charge the White House called "poisonous."

"The president knows that because the troops are in harm's way that we
won't cut off the resources," Pelosi, head of the Democratic-led House,
told ABC's "Good Morning America. "That's why he's moving so quickly to
put them in harm's way."
Saying Democrats were waging a "sound-bite war," White House spokeswoman
Dana Perino fired back: "Questioning the president's motivations and
suggesting that he for some political reason is rushing troops into
harm's way is not appropriate, it is not correct and it is unfortunate."
The bitter exchange marked an escalation in the political fight over
Bush's plan, unveiled last week to a skeptical public, to send 21,500
more troops to Iraq as part of a reworked war strategy.

"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:WLKdnYDS5v9BIS_YnZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@comcast.com...

I stand behind what she says 100%

And I'm not a Democrat.

But you are a leftist.

"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:c%psh.68716$wP1.29412@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...

The Imperial Princess Pelosi once again exemplifies how she speaks with
forked tongue by saying she would drum in a new era of Bi-Partisanship

( a

case of please don't pay attention to what the man behind the curtain
is
doing). And of course the fringe left will always fall for anything the
Imperial Princess tells them to believe since they have never bee an
ilk

to

think for themselves, much less employ critical thinking skills.

Maybe if Princess Pelosi just promoted substantive legislation
regarding
Iraq which reflects her true convictions like defunding the war (if
that

is

what she believes) instead of Paper-Tiger ***** and cut the word war
crap, she'd get the respect of her anointed speakership. However, the
hypocrite Imperial Princess would rather say she is being Bi-Partisan

while

waging her poisonous comments of Bush, who actually promotes his policy
without character assassination of democrats.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070119/pl_nm/iraq_usa_dc_4

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Intensifying a war of words over a U.S. troop

buildup

in Iraq, House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused
President
George W. Bush on Friday of playing politics with soldiers' lives, a

charge

the White House called "poisonous."

"The president knows that because the troops are in harm's way that we

won't

cut off the resources," Pelosi, head of the Democratic-led House, told

ABC's

"Good Morning America. "That's why he's moving so quickly to put them
in
harm's way."
Saying Democrats were waging a "sound-bite war," White House
spokeswoman
Dana Perino fired back: "Questioning the president's motivations and
suggesting that he for some political reason is rushing troops into

harm's

way is not appropriate, it is not correct and it is unfortunate."
The bitter exchange marked an escalation in the political fight over

Bush's

plan, unveiled last week to a skeptical public, to send 21,500 more

troops

to Iraq as part of a reworked war strategy.

And I'm not a Democrat.

But you are a leftist.