Just as there are consequences for a war, there should be consequences
for people who lie to start one. An honorable nation can not be led by
a despicable and disgusting liar like Tony Blair and he would do well
to do us the last service and resign.
http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=485376
Charles Kennedy: Mr Blair misled us - and now he is looking silly
I have avoided accusations of 'lying' but it is surely as bad that he drove
us to an unnecessary war
28 January 2004
I met too many brave and dignified widows last October. The occasion was the
memorial service at St Paul's Cathedral, London, for the troops who died in
Iraq. It was moving and emotional. As I talked to the families of those who
had been killed, I found that some were angry and others disillusioned,
while many seemed simply hurt and bewildered. As a politician, I was
fiercely aware that we had let them down. Tony Blair kept his distance.
There can be no greater test of a Prime Minister than his leadership in time
of war. He is, in effect, playing God - making life and death decisions
about British soldiers as well as enemy combatants and civilians. Tony Blair
persuaded a reluctant Parliament that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass
destruction which were a "current and serious" threat to our national
security. So far, 58 British troops have died in Iraq, but no chemical or
biological weapons have been found.
I believe the Prime Minister made a disastrous error of judgment over Iraq
and last week's ICM poll showed that 48 per cent of the population believe
he lied. This is enormously damaging both to his integrity and the trust we
should have in the office.
Lord Hutton was asked to examine the narrow circumstances of David Kelly's
death. I hope the Kelly family will find some comfort in his words. The
distinguished judge may censure and blame certain people for the way they
treated Dr Kelly. But it's highly unlikely he will deal with the most
important question of all. He won't tell us why Mr Blair took us to war on a
false premise - saying there were weapons of mass destruction ready to be
launched in 45 minutes, when none have been found.
I have avoided bandying about accusations of "lying". Our Prime Minister is
the elected servant of the people and his behaviour reflects on all of us.
We do great damage to our democracy and to our international reputation when
we use such words lightly. I also believe it distracts from a matter of
equal importance, the question of the Prime Minister's judgement.
Of course, were it to be proved that the Prime Minister knew this 45-minute
claim was false, but went ahead in making his case to the nation, he would
certainly have to resign. But it is surely equally damaging that, convinced
as he was of the scale of Saddam's arsenal and the threat he posed, without
the hard facts to back up the case, Tony Blair drove us into an unnecessary
war.
As it happens, I believe the Prime Minister was sincere. I have known him
for 20 years and he made his case with passion. But - with all his forensic
barrister's skills - how did he fail to ask the critical questions? Why did
he allow a single, uncorroborated intelligence claim to achieve such huge
prominence? Why did he accept and pass on to the nation only the
intelligence which supported his case, while suppressing other key pieces of
advice, such as the assessment that a war could create great instability in
Iraq, distracting from the wider war on terrorism?
Whether knowingly or not, Tony Blair misled us; his judgement was seriously
flawed. Mr Blair clings to his assertions that in the end some evidence will
be found by the Iraq Survey Group. This is now starting to make him look
silly. Even if some weapons were eventually to turn up, they won't help him.
It is quite clear there was no vast, battle-ready arsenal. Tony Blair took
us to war on a false prospectus and we cannot, as a nation, let that pass
unquestioned.
The Prime Minister acted properly when he moved quickly to set up the Hutton
inquiry. He should now do the decent - and long overdue - thing and
establish an independent investigation to restore trust in his office.
On that basis, Lord Hutton's report should be the opening curtain and not
the last word. But there is a danger that won't happen.
The Conservatives are unintentionally helping to get the Prime Minister off
the hook. Michael Howard is pursuing the wrong issue. He suggested in
Parliament that the Prime Minister misled journalists in an informal
briefing on a plane shortly after David Kelly died. Of course, what happened
during that briefing is important, but set alongside the much greater
untruth perpetrated by Saddam's weapons of mass destruction it's just a
sideshow. And the Conservative leader has already conceded it's unlikely
that Lord Hutton will even mention it.
The problem for the Tories is that they can't credibly take on Tony Blair
about the real issues because they were his principal cheerleaders for the
war. But once the sound and fury of the mud-slinging over the despatch box
has died down, there is a danger the nation will be suffering from "inquiry
fatigue" and the appetite for knowledge, however incomplete, will have been
sated. If that happens, the Government spin doctors will heave a sigh of
relief and our democracy will be the poorer for it.
As we edged towards war, my party asked a series of questions. On Wednesday,
as leader of the Liberal Democrats, I shall, once again, be putting those
questions and I shall seek a proper inquiry. But I'm not holding my breath.
I suspect if the PM was confident of the outcome, such an inquiry would be
already under way. It's ironic. He's said time and again that history will
be his judge, and yet he looks set to deny history the opportunity of
getting the whole truth.
The writer is leader of the Liberal Democrat Party
.
|
