| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
15 May 2006 07:19:51 PM |
| Object: |
MUSLIMS ARE REALLY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION |
Just for the record, I have cut and pasted most of what you see here
from many sources.
The illiterate and pathetic flock of Mohammad followers' known as
Muslims is rampaging all around the world. Below are past and present
terrorist acts followed by an eerie silence from the Muslim/Islam
society/community.
Here is a historical review:
Muslims in 1972 kidnapped and killed Israeli athletes at the Munich
Summer
Olympics. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1983 bombed the U.S. embassy in Beirut, Lebanon. The attack
left 63 dead, including 17 Americans. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims in 1983 bombed the U.S. military barracks at Beirut airport,
killing 241 Marines. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1983 bombed French paratroopers in their barracks in West
Beirut: killed 58. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1983 bombed the U.S. embassy and other targets in Kuwait
City, Kuwait, killing 5 and injuring 80. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims in 1984 bombed the U.S. embassy annex in Beirut, Lebanon,
killing 24, including 2 U.S. military personnel. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims in 1984 hijacked Kuwait Airways Flight 221, from Kuwait to
Pakistan, and diverted to Tehran. 2 Americans killed. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1985 bombed a restaurant in Madrid, Spain that was
frequented by U.S. soldiers: killed 18 Spaniards and injured 82. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1985 hijacked and held for 17 days TWA Flight 847 from
Athens to Rome. Hijacked to Beirut, a U.S. Navy diver was executed. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1985 attack an Italian cruise ship, Achille Lauro. One U.S.
tourist killed. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1985 bombed airports in Rome, Italy and Vienna, Austria
killing 20 people, 5 of whom were Americans. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims in 1986 bombed a disco in West Berlin, Germany frequented by
U=2ES. servicemen, killing 2 and injuring hundreds. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims in 1988 destroyed Pan-Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland.
This Boeing 747 exploded in flight from plastic explosives killing two
hundred seventy people from 21 countries including 11 people in the
town of Lockerbie and 35 Syracuse University students: A total of 189
of the victims were Americans. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims tried to destroy the World Trade Center by exploding a car bomb
in the garage in 1993: Killing 6 and injuring 1,040. No Muslim outrage.
A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1995 bombed U.S. military headquarters in Riyadh, Saudi
Arabia killing 5 U.S. military servicemen. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims in 1996 a bomb exploded outside Khobar Towers military complex,
killing 19 American servicemen and injuring hundreds of others. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1998 bombed 2 U.S. embassies, killing 224 (213 in Nairobi,
Kenya and 11 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania) and injuring about 4,500. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2000 bombed the U.S. Navy destroyer USS Cole killing 17
servicemen. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims on September 11, 2001 flew two commercial airliners (American
Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175) into the World Trade
Center in New York City killing 2,749. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims on September 11, 2001 flew a commercial airliner (American
Airlines Flight 77) into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia killing 64
on board and 125 in the Pentagon.. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims on September 11, 2001 flew a commercial airliner (United
Airlines Flight 93) into the ground in Shanksville, Pennsylvania
killing 45. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2002 exploded a bomb outside the American consulate in
Karachi, Pakistan, killing 12. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2003 exploded a bomb at a housing complex for Westerners in
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia killing 34, including 8 Americans. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2004 attack the offices of a Saudi oil company in Khobar,
Saudi Arabia, took foreign oil workers hostage in a nearby residential
compound, leaving 22 people dead including one American. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2004 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia kidnapped and executed Paul
Johnson Jr., an American, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 2 other Americans
and BBC cameraman killed by gun attacks. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims in 2004 murdered a Dutch filmmaker who was producing a
documentary critical of the role of women in Islam. No Muslim outrage.
A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2004 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia stormed the U.S. consulate
killing 5 consulate employees. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2005 in Amman, Jordan bombed 3 American hotels: Radisson,
Grand Hyatt and Days Inn, killing 57. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
In Europe, the Middle East, the Pacific Rim ... the barbaric,
illiterate and pathetic flock of Mohammad known as Muslims is spreading
more mayhem. It seems that these parasitic Muslims are rioting and
firing their ever-present AK-47s into the air because of some silly
unflattering depictions of Mohammed cartoons that were published in
newspapers in Norway and Denmark. So what does this barbaric,
illiterate and infantile Muslim terrorist organization decide to do?
They Kill.
Muslim officials block the exit where schoolgirls are trying to escape
a burning building because their faces were exposed. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims cut off the heads of three teenaged girls on their way to
school in Indonesia. A Christian school. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims murder teachers trying to teach Muslim children in Iraq. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims murder over 80 tourists with car bombs outside cafes and hotels
in Egypt. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
A Muslim attacks a missionary children's school in India. Kills six.
No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims slaughter hundreds of children and teachers in Beslan, Russia.
Muslims shoot children in the back. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims fire rocket-propelled grenades into schools full of children in
Israel. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims murder more than 50 commuters in attacks on London subways and
busses. Over 700 are injured. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims massacre dozens of innocents at a Passover Seder. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims murder innocent vacationers in Bali. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims beat the charred bodies of Western civilians with their shoes,
then hang them from a bridge. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslim newspapers publish anti-Semitic cartoons. No Muslim outrage and
this sets the stage for additional terror acts.
Newspapers in Denmark and Norway publish cartoons depicting Mohammed.
Muslims are outraged. . Dead children: Dead tourists: Dead teachers:
Dead doctors: and Dead nurses. Death, destruction and mayhem around
the world at the hands of Muslims yet no Muslim outrage ... but publish
a cartoon depicting Mohammed with a bomb in his turban and all hell
breaks loose. Is this really about cartoons? They're rampaging and
burning flags. They're looking for Europeans to kidnap. They're
threatening innkeepers and generally raising holy Muslim hell not
because of any outrage over a cartoon. They're outraged because it is
part of the Islamic jihadist culture to be outraged. You don't really
need a reason. You just need an
excuse. Wandering around, destroying property, murdering children,
firing guns into the air and feigning outrage over the slightest
perceived insult is to a jihadist what tailgating is to a Steeler's
fan. I know and understand that these bloodthirsty murderers do not
represent the majority of the world's Muslims. When, though, do they
become outraged? When do they take to the streets to express their
outrage at the radicals who are making their religion the object of
worldwide hatred and ridicule? Islamic writer Salman Rushdie wrote of
these silent Muslims in a New York Times article three years ago. "As
their ancient, deeply civilized culture of love, art and philosophical
reflection is hijacked by paranoiacs, racists, liars, male
supremacists, tyrants, fanatics and violence junkies, why are they not
screaming?"
UK Muslims were 'outraged' when asked to condemn terror. UK Muslims
across a wide spectrum regarded the remarks as "outrageous" and
"disgraceful."
The Arab press has long allowed and encouraged the practice of
publishing cartoons and caricatures of their own that, with a
unrelentingly hateful, racist, and homicidal tone, target almost
exclusively one group for this journalistic malevolence: Jews and the
State of Israel. These cartoons regularly demonize Israel, depict its
citizens as having become virtual Nazis, and show Jews as animals and
subhuman sadists manipulating the United States and subjugating the
Muslim world.
The extent of the hatred and libelous accusations towards Israel in the
Arab media, and towards Jews worldwide, is so prevalent it has stunned
observers of the world press. Harold Evans, former editor of the Sunday
Times of London, for instance, noted how the use of these themes in
Arab cartoons help fuel the long-standing, corrosive myths which not
only make Jew hatred possible but inevitable. "The Muslim world's
relentless caricatures of the Jew are boringly on the same one note,"
Evans said. "Jews are always dirty, hook-nosed, money-grubbing,
vindictive and scheming parasites. They are barbarians who deliberately
spread vice, drugs and prostitution, and poison water."
Unlike Muslims, Israelis and Jews in other countries never seem to
react to the publication of these works by taking to the streets,
denouncing Islam, and calling for the beheading of the offending
cartoonists or the bombing of mosques. The U.S. State Department has
never publicly scolded the Arab press and cautioned them that
Israeli's "feelings might be hurt" with this type of journalistic
attack. And The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour,
has never made a public pronouncement, as she did in response to the
Danish cartoons, that she finds "alarming any behaviors that
disregard the beliefs of others. This kind of thing is unacceptable."
Since the Qu'ran itself calls Jews the 'descendents of apes and
pigs.' This in of itself completely invalidates any worth this book
may have as a religious manual. Whoever wrote it certainly did not get
this divine belief from a God or his disciple(s). If this
interpretation is literal (it is hard to believe it is), any sane and
intelligent human would have realized that since an ancient medieval
ignorant society or person wrote it, one would have instantly dismissed
the Qu'ran as a hoax.
The Qu'ran did inadvertently get half the story right; Humans do
descend from apes; although its not clear if pigs descended from apes
as well. Maybe apes descended from pigs. Nevertheless, in due course,
scientist will reveal the answer.
If you are a Muslim you have two choices. If you choose to speak out
against terrorism you support the western culture of freedom of all
things innately human. If you are a Muslim and choose to remain silent
you are against western civilized freedoms and therefore are seen
supporting unconditionally, the dysfunctionally ignorant, oppressive,
na=EFve, bigoted, racists, genocidal murderous fanatic lunatics within
the Muslim flock.
.
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: MUSLIMS ARE REALLY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION |
16 May 2006 07:04:30 PM |
|
|
Advice for Patriots
By Dr. William Pierce
Today let's talk about some of the things that have changed in America
since September 11. I'm not thinking about all of the new rigamarole
at airports or about how Mr. Bush's campaign of cruise-missile
diplomacy in the Middle East is going or even about how opening the
mail each morning in media offices around the country and in
politicians' offices in Washington has become a much more exciting
operation than it used to be
when Ted Kaczynski was the only person putting dangerous things into
letters.
I'm more interested in the changes in the Politically Correct party
line laid down for the lemmings by the media. I'm interested in
changes in the way Americans view the world. And I'm interested in the
changed prospects for the future of America.
The most interesting thing about the new party line is its stupidity.
The Jews were caught by surprise last month, and they had to whip up
something in a hurry in order to deflect blame from Israel and from
the U.S. government's support for Israel. Apparently the best they
could do on a moment's notice is the explanation that Osama bin Laden
attacked us
simply because he hates our freedom and democracy. Since they first
cooked up that explanation they've refined it quite a bit. Both the
Foreign Ministry in Israel and the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee, Israel's enormously powerful lobby in Washington, have been
circulating "talking papers" to their own people, to politicians, and
to everyone else who is likely to be making a public statement about
America's new war or about Washington's past policy in the Middle
East.
These "talking papers" tell people how to counter what the Jews call
Osama bin Laden's "lies" and also how to respond to anyone who
suggests that our government's support of Israel might have had
something to do with the September 11 attack. The papers warn people
never to raise this subject, but if someone else insists on talking
about it, it is to be
countered with the explanation that support for Israel had nothing at
all to do with the attack, that we would have been attacked even if we
weren't supporting Israel, and that the only reason for the attack is
Osama bin Laden's irrational hatred of America's freedom and
democracy.
I believe that it's clear that many people actually believe this
nonsense, judging by the number of cars with red, white, and blue
ribbons tied to their antennas. But these are the people who believe
everything Tom Brokaw or their beloved Big Brother in the White House
tells them. If George Bush came on TV and told them with that
mock-solemn expression of his that a Martian invasion force had just
landed, that the Martians were demanding one million sacrificial
virgins as their price for not destroying Hollywood and Washington,
and that U.S. Army troops would be going door to door to collect
virgins, the folks with the ribbons on their antennas would believe
it, and they would prepare to hand over any virgins in their
households. They would consider it their patriotic duty. The party
line may change from time to time, but lemmings never change.
Well, the lemmings may believe that U.S. support for Israel had
nothing to do with the September 11 attack or with the anthrax-laden
letters now going around, but no one else believes it. Last week the
media bosses were kicking themselves because they had let the text of
a statement Osama bin Laden had made be published in the United
States. They said that they had made a mistake in putting this
statement before the American public. They wouldn't publish any
further Osama bin Laden statements, they said, because the statements
might contain secret instructions for his operatives.
Everyone I've spoken with laughed at that excuse. In his last
statement Osama bin Laden said that Americans would not be secure and
would have no peace of mind as long as Palestinians were not secure in
their own land. That's the sort of powerful and simple message that
even Sally Soccer Mom and Joe Sixpack might understand, and that's
what the Jewish media bosses don't want the public to hear. They're
not worried about secret instructions; they're worried about the
lemmings figuring out what's going on.
Actually, I think there's very little danger of that. And really, the
changes I'm more interested in are in the outlook of the minority of
the population able to think for itself: the minority that doesn't
believe whatever Tom Brokaw says. You know, I've been talking to this
minority for years-decades, actually-warning them about the
consequences of letting their government get out of control, warning
them of the consequences of permitting the Jews of Hollywood and New
York to run our country through their control of our mass media,
warning them of the consequences of continuing to sit on their hands
and keep their mouths shut from fear of being denounced by the media
as "anti-Semites" or "racists."
And I wasn't having as much success as I wanted at getting them to pay
attention and change their ways. Many of those who listened wouldn't
do anything because what I was warning them about didn't seem quite
real. Despite all the changes they could see around them-the
deterioration of our cities and our schools, the darkening of the
racial complexion of America, the trashing of our culture by the mass
media, the increasingly
obvious efforts of the Jewish media bosses to persuade our young women
that they should bed down with non-Whites-despite everything, they
themselves managed to remain comfortable and economically secure, so
the things I was warning them about didn't seem quite real. They had
convinced themselves that they were above it all, that they could
continue to watch the destruction of their country and their people
all around them, and it would never affect them personally: that they
could remain secure and comfortable while everything around them went
to hell. Osama bin Laden jolted some of them awake on September 11:
some of those whose attention I hadn't been able to catch with my own
warnings. He convinced some of them that what they had been observing
going on around them for years was in fact real: that continuing to
ignore the degenerative processes promoted by the media and the
government and hoping for the best really wasn't a good strategy for
personal survival. In particular, he convinced many members of the
thinking minority that losing control of our government really is a
serious matter, that
permitting our government to be used by the Jews against their
neighbors in the Middle East-and also against the genuine interests of
the American people-could have real consequences at home.
I have the feeling that many of these thinking people are paying at
least a little more attention now to the things we've been talking
about here every week. The fact that the number of people who download
these broadcasts from my Web site each Saturday has nearly doubled
since September 11 is a pretty good indication of this, I believe.
Just as I'm getting more hate mail from the red-white-and-blue-ribbon
types, I'm also getting more thoughtful responses from the people who
understand and care. Which is to say, I think I have an audience now
that not only is bigger but also is more attentive and responsive.
That is really important.
I'm not discouraged by the fact that the attentive and responsive
people still constitute only a minority of a minority. I'm encouraged
by the fact that the attentive people now make up a larger minority of
the thinking portion of the population than they did before September
11. Important things always are done by minorities. Majorities don't
make
decisions; individuals do; small minorities do. History is made by
active minorities. Sometimes an active minority may use the passive
majority as a tool or a weapon, but the minority always acts in accord
with its own will.
What's important is which minority is making the decisions, which
minority is active at any particular moment. For at least the past 60
years it's been the wrong minority, an alien minority that is
implacably hostile to our people. If we are to survive, that must
change. Our minority must become active instead. Our minority must
grow to include more of the thinking portion of our population. And
that is happening now. That's been happening since September 11.
The people who understand and care have been forced to begin paying
attention. I have a very strong premonition that there will be other
things in the reasonably near future that will make them pay even
closer attention. The Bush government, just like the Clinton
government before it, thinks that it can stop terrorism with cruise
missiles and smart bombs. But just think for a moment: whether Osama
bin Laden survives the Bush government's current war against Israel's
enemies in the Middle East or not, he already has become immortal. In
the eyes of Muslims he has been elevated to a status in heaven
alongside Mohammed. His name will be praised, and stories will be told
about him around campfires throughout the Muslim world for countless
generations to come, long
after the Bush government has gone and been forgotten. Cruise missiles
can't take Osama bin Laden's immortality away from him. There's
nothing the Bush government can do to diminish his glory in the Muslim
world. In fact, the more cruise missiles and smart bombs the United
States unleashes on the Muslim world, the higher will Osama bin
Laden's esteem rise; the more will his strike against the United
States seem justified to his fellow Muslims.
Don't be fooled by the tame "house Muslims" the media bosses have been
trotting out to explain to the lemmings that violence is abhorrent to
"real Muslims." The real Muslims are the ones rioting against the
government in Pakistan now. The real Muslims are the ones singing
Osama bin Laden's praises now. And there will be no shortage of other
young Muslims lusting for a share in his glory, lusting to have their
praises sung around campfires too. Cruise missiles don't frighten
them. There are enough of them already in this country to keep things
jumping, thanks to the government's insane immigration policy of
recent decades. The anthrax-laced letters that have been going around
all were mailed from inside this country. And anthrax is by no means
the nastiest thing that can be mailed in an envelope. The media won't
even mention the biological warfare agents the government is really
afraid of, because they don't want to give anyone ideas.
The fact is, terrorism has been made much more fashionable since
September 11, and the stakes have been raised. Simple truck bombs
won't get much respect in the future, but I have a suspicion that
we'll see a few more of them anyway. And I suspect that we'll also see
people trying to outdo Osama bin Laden's September 11 televised
extravaganza. The
government and the media suspect the same thing, and they're
frightened. That's why they're trying so desperately to stifle dissent
and keep everyone pledging allegiance to the flag.
At the University of California in Los Angeles a library worker,
53-year-old Jonnie Hargis, has been suspended without pay because he
sent out an e-mail letter criticizing U.S. support for Israel's
aggression. The university administration explained that it has a
policy against using university computers for political messages, but
Hargis, who has worked at the UCLA library for 22 years, pointed out
that no one who has been sending out pro-Israel and pro-war messages
has been punished.
There are similar situations at other universities around the country.
Jews and neo-conservatives post belligerent, bloodthirsty messages
calling for the annihilation of all of the Jews' enemies in the Middle
East, including Iraq and Iran as well as Afghanistan. Anyone who calls
instead for eliminating the cause of the September 11 attack-that is,
for stopping the blind support by the U.S. government of Israel's
aggression-is censured and threatened with expulsion or with being
fired.
There are still people around who can remember how it was at our
universities during the Vietnam war. That was when treason ruled on
campuses. Students burned their draft cards and put up Viet Cong flags
and posters of Ho Chi Minh in their dormitories. Jewish activists in
groups such as Students for a Democratic Society organized pro-Viet
Cong
rallies on campuses. Professors encouraged this activity, and
administrators didn't interfere, citing free speech.
The switch to red, white, and blue ribbons and saluting the flag came
rather suddenly last month, and a lot of thinking people understand
why it came. They understand that it is when America is involved in a
war to promote Jewish interests that pledging allegiance to the flag
suddenly is declared fashionable. When Israel's welfare is threatened,
Jews, ordinarily noted for their cynicism and irreverence, suddenly
put their hands over their hearts and begin singing The Star-Spangled
Banner, and they glare at anyone who isn't singing loudly enough. And
people who make the mistake of asking why get fired or suspended. But
you know, firing people or suspending people who have dissenting
opinions doesn't go down well with the independent thinkers. And I'll
guarantee you:
there will be a lot more dissent before this war is over. And the
Jewish media won't be able to hide it all.
What we are beginning to see now is a sharpening division between the
Jews, their bought politicians, and the "I pledge allegiance,"
authoritarian types on one side, and everyone else on the other side.
We also saw a division, along different lines, during the Vietnam war,
with the authoritarians and the Jews on opposite sides instead of the
same
side. I believe that the division this time will develop faster and
become sharper.
I don't know how the war itself will develop. It was clear before it
began that the U.S. military machine is quite capable of flattening
Afghanistan or any other Third World country without suffering any
significant losses to its own personnel, simply because we can hit
them from a distance with a great deal of destructive power, and they
don't have the means to hit back-except through what we call
"terrorism." It is certain that there will be more terrorism,
although, of course, I cannot predict the form it will take or its
magnitude.
I can predict, however, that the media and the politicians will
denounce it as "cowardly" and will act as if America has been wronged:
that whatever form the next blow against America takes and wherever it
comes from, it will be declared "unprovoked." And I can predict that
the polls published by the media will continue to show nearly every
American
wildly enthusiastic about the war, even as the opposition to the war
grows.
One interesting thing about the opposition this time is that it is
growing both among the Gentile Left and among genuine patriots. During
the Vietnam war the members of the Gentile Left all were on the Jewish
side. Despite the current agreement between leftists and patriots on
the single issue of ending support for Israel and limiting the war in
the
Middle East, I don't see much chance of real collaboration between
these two elements. The Gentile Left is still hopelessly confused on
such essential issues as race and feminism and homosexuality and
permissiveness. But the war is indeed driving a wedge between Jews and
Gentile leftists-a deeper wedge than that driven by the development of
Jewish neo-conservatism after the Vietnam war, and for that we should
be thankful.
There may be other hopeful developments as well. The assassination in
Jerusalem this week of one of Israel's most bloodthirsty Jewish
militants by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
certainly was a welcome move. Until now all of the assassins have been
Jews, and all of the victims have been Palestinians. It's too soon to
know whether
or not this one act of retribution against the Israeli leadership will
be followed by other successful blows, but it may be that the events
of recent weeks have emboldened the Palestinians to act with more
imagination and enterprise than before.
Looking ahead a bit, there are several signs of hope here on our own
home front. The heightened sense of reality among non-lemmings, the
lessening of their sense of detachment, the stronger realization that
they cannot survive by continuing to sit on their hands and watch the
Jews destroy the world around them- -- this is the single most
important consequence of recent events. This, together with the
growing alienation between Gentile leftists and Jews, leaves the Jews
in a weaker position than they have been in a long time. They will
crack their whips more frantically than before, trying to keep
everyone in line, but the principal effect of that will be to generate
even more resentment against them.
Things are a bit brittle now. A few dozen more anthrax cases, another
truck bomb in a well chosen location, and substantial changes could
take place in a hurry: a stock market panic, martial law measures by
the Bush government, and a sharpening of the debate as to how we got
ourselves get into this mess in the first place. As the debate
sharpens, the Jews and their collaborators will pull out all of the
stops in an effort to stifle it, but I don't think that even a
declaration of martial law can stifle it now. Too many people already
smell the stink in Washington. Too many people already understand on
whose hands is the blood of 6,000 innocent Americans who died last
month. Too many people understand the true motivation behind the
current war against Israel's enemies in the
Middle East. The genie is out of the bottle now, and not even Mr.
Bush's new anti-terrorism agency-what does he call it? -- the Office
of Homeland Security? -- not even this new Federal agency can put it
back in the bottle.
It's a strange thing: in a novel I wrote more than 12 years ago - the
title is Hunter-I talked about the formation of a new anti-terrorism
agency, separate from the FBI. And I pointed out that the principal
aim of the new agency would not be to protect the public from
terrorism, but to protect the government from an increasingly restless
and disillusioned public: a sort of modern Praetorian Guard. I think
that we'll be seeing more developments in that direction in the next
few months, with the timing depending upon when the next surprise
comes and its magnitude.
Of course, I don't know what will happen next to shatter already
jangled nerves, but it is likely that something will happen. My advice
to responsible patriots now is this: Expect a surprise, and remain
calm when it comes. But don't wait for it to come to raise your voice.
Speak out now. Don't be intimidated by the mindless yahoos waving
their flags
or by the government or by the media. If you point out calmly and in a
reasoned way who is responsible for what happened to America last
month you will have more people agreeing with you than you might
imagine. If you call for your fellow Americans to join you in
regaining control of their government, the response will be greater
than at any time in recent years.
Thanks for being with me again today.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nog" |
|
| Title: Re: MUSLIMS ARE REALLY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION |
17 May 2006 11:32:39 AM |
|
|
Follow us or die!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: MUSLIMS ARE REALLY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION |
15 May 2006 08:49:36 PM |
|
|
Not all Muslims. Just the 90 percent of them that support the killing
of women and children.
------------------
www.cafepress.com/bush_doggers?pid=2794571
.
|
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: BUSHKULT REALLY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION |
17 May 2006 09:40:46 AM |
|
|
On 15 May 2006 18:49:36 -0700, wrote:
... support the killing
of women and children.
Of course you do: you're a bushkultie.
You're into human sacrifice.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: MUSLIMS ARE REALLY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION |
17 May 2006 12:44:11 PM |
|
|
You right except about your historical review is 1400 yr late and omits
many terror acts of Mo the merciless.
ebrainsh@yahoo.com wrote:
Just for the record, I have cut and pasted most of what you see here
from many sources.
The illiterate and pathetic flock of Mohammad followers' known as
Muslims is rampaging all around the world. Below are past and present
terrorist acts followed by an eerie silence from the Muslim/Islam
society/community.
Here is a historical review:
Muslims in 1972 kidnapped and killed Israeli athletes at the Munich
Summer
Olympics. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1983 bombed the U.S. embassy in Beirut, Lebanon. The attack
left 63 dead, including 17 Americans. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims in 1983 bombed the U.S. military barracks at Beirut airport,
killing 241 Marines. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1983 bombed French paratroopers in their barracks in West
Beirut: killed 58. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1983 bombed the U.S. embassy and other targets in Kuwait
City, Kuwait, killing 5 and injuring 80. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims in 1984 bombed the U.S. embassy annex in Beirut, Lebanon,
killing 24, including 2 U.S. military personnel. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims in 1984 hijacked Kuwait Airways Flight 221, from Kuwait to
Pakistan, and diverted to Tehran. 2 Americans killed. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1985 bombed a restaurant in Madrid, Spain that was
frequented by U.S. soldiers: killed 18 Spaniards and injured 82. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1985 hijacked and held for 17 days TWA Flight 847 from
Athens to Rome. Hijacked to Beirut, a U.S. Navy diver was executed. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1985 attack an Italian cruise ship, Achille Lauro. One U.S.
tourist killed. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1985 bombed airports in Rome, Italy and Vienna, Austria
killing 20 people, 5 of whom were Americans. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims in 1986 bombed a disco in West Berlin, Germany frequented by
U.S. servicemen, killing 2 and injuring hundreds. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims in 1988 destroyed Pan-Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland.
This Boeing 747 exploded in flight from plastic explosives killing two
hundred seventy people from 21 countries including 11 people in the
town of Lockerbie and 35 Syracuse University students: A total of 189
of the victims were Americans. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims tried to destroy the World Trade Center by exploding a car bomb
in the garage in 1993: Killing 6 and injuring 1,040. No Muslim outrage.
A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1995 bombed U.S. military headquarters in Riyadh, Saudi
Arabia killing 5 U.S. military servicemen. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims in 1996 a bomb exploded outside Khobar Towers military complex,
killing 19 American servicemen and injuring hundreds of others. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 1998 bombed 2 U.S. embassies, killing 224 (213 in Nairobi,
Kenya and 11 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania) and injuring about 4,500. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2000 bombed the U.S. Navy destroyer USS Cole killing 17
servicemen. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims on September 11, 2001 flew two commercial airliners (American
Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175) into the World Trade
Center in New York City killing 2,749. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims on September 11, 2001 flew a commercial airliner (American
Airlines Flight 77) into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia killing 64
on board and 125 in the Pentagon.. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims on September 11, 2001 flew a commercial airliner (United
Airlines Flight 93) into the ground in Shanksville, Pennsylvania
killing 45. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2002 exploded a bomb outside the American consulate in
Karachi, Pakistan, killing 12. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2003 exploded a bomb at a housing complex for Westerners in
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia killing 34, including 8 Americans. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2004 attack the offices of a Saudi oil company in Khobar,
Saudi Arabia, took foreign oil workers hostage in a nearby residential
compound, leaving 22 people dead including one American. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2004 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia kidnapped and executed Paul
Johnson Jr., an American, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 2 other Americans
and BBC cameraman killed by gun attacks. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims in 2004 murdered a Dutch filmmaker who was producing a
documentary critical of the role of women in Islam. No Muslim outrage.
A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2004 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia stormed the U.S. consulate
killing 5 consulate employees. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims in 2005 in Amman, Jordan bombed 3 American hotels: Radisson,
Grand Hyatt and Days Inn, killing 57. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
In Europe, the Middle East, the Pacific Rim ... the barbaric,
illiterate and pathetic flock of Mohammad known as Muslims is spreading
more mayhem. It seems that these parasitic Muslims are rioting and
firing their ever-present AK-47s into the air because of some silly
unflattering depictions of Mohammed cartoons that were published in
newspapers in Norway and Denmark. So what does this barbaric,
illiterate and infantile Muslim terrorist organization decide to do?
They Kill.
Muslim officials block the exit where schoolgirls are trying to escape
a burning building because their faces were exposed. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims cut off the heads of three teenaged girls on their way to
school in Indonesia. A Christian school. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims murder teachers trying to teach Muslim children in Iraq. No
Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims murder over 80 tourists with car bombs outside cafes and hotels
in Egypt. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
A Muslim attacks a missionary children's school in India. Kills six.
No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims slaughter hundreds of children and teachers in Beslan, Russia.
Muslims shoot children in the back. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist
act.
Muslims fire rocket-propelled grenades into schools full of children in
Israel. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims murder more than 50 commuters in attacks on London subways and
busses. Over 700 are injured. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims massacre dozens of innocents at a Passover Seder. No Muslim
outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslims murder innocent vacationers in Bali. No Muslim outrage. A
terrorist act.
Muslims beat the charred bodies of Western civilians with their shoes,
then hang them from a bridge. No Muslim outrage. A terrorist act.
Muslim newspapers publish anti-Semitic cartoons. No Muslim outrage and
this sets the stage for additional terror acts.
Newspapers in Denmark and Norway publish cartoons depicting Mohammed.
Muslims are outraged. . Dead children: Dead tourists: Dead teachers:
Dead doctors: and Dead nurses. Death, destruction and mayhem around
the world at the hands of Muslims yet no Muslim outrage ... but publish
a cartoon depicting Mohammed with a bomb in his turban and all hell
breaks loose. Is this really about cartoons? They're rampaging and
burning flags. They're looking for Europeans to kidnap. They're
threatening innkeepers and generally raising holy Muslim hell not
because of any outrage over a cartoon. They're outraged because it is
part of the Islamic jihadist culture to be outraged. You don't really
need a reason. You just need an
excuse. Wandering around, destroying property, murdering children,
firing guns into the air and feigning outrage over the slightest
perceived insult is to a jihadist what tailgating is to a Steeler's
fan. I know and understand that these bloodthirsty murderers do not
represent the majority of the world's Muslims. When, though, do they
become outraged? When do they take to the streets to express their
outrage at the radicals who are making their religion the object of
worldwide hatred and ridicule? Islamic writer Salman Rushdie wrote of
these silent Muslims in a New York Times article three years ago. "As
their ancient, deeply civilized culture of love, art and philosophical
reflection is hijacked by paranoiacs, racists, liars, male
supremacists, tyrants, fanatics and violence junkies, why are they not
screaming?"
UK Muslims were 'outraged' when asked to condemn terror. UK Muslims
across a wide spectrum regarded the remarks as "outrageous" and
"disgraceful."
The Arab press has long allowed and encouraged the practice of
publishing cartoons and caricatures of their own that, with a
unrelentingly hateful, racist, and homicidal tone, target almost
exclusively one group for this journalistic malevolence: Jews and the
State of Israel. These cartoons regularly demonize Israel, depict its
citizens as having become virtual Nazis, and show Jews as animals and
subhuman sadists manipulating the United States and subjugating the
Muslim world.
The extent of the hatred and libelous accusations towards Israel in the
Arab media, and towards Jews worldwide, is so prevalent it has stunned
observers of the world press. Harold Evans, former editor of the Sunday
Times of London, for instance, noted how the use of these themes in
Arab cartoons help fuel the long-standing, corrosive myths which not
only make Jew hatred possible but inevitable. "The Muslim world's
relentless caricatures of the Jew are boringly on the same one note,"
Evans said. "Jews are always dirty, hook-nosed, money-grubbing,
vindictive and scheming parasites. They are barbarians who deliberately
spread vice, drugs and prostitution, and poison water."
Unlike Muslims, Israelis and Jews in other countries never seem to
react to the publication of these works by taking to the streets,
denouncing Islam, and calling for the beheading of the offending
cartoonists or the bombing of mosques. The U.S. State Department has
never publicly scolded the Arab press and cautioned them that
Israeli's "feelings might be hurt" with this type of journalistic
attack. And The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour,
has never made a public pronouncement, as she did in response to the
Danish cartoons, that she finds "alarming any behaviors that
disregard the beliefs of others. This kind of thing is unacceptable."
Since the Qu'ran itself calls Jews the 'descendents of apes and
pigs.' This in of itself completely invalidates any worth this book
may have as a religious manual. Whoever wrote it certainly did not get
this divine belief from a God or his disciple(s). If this
interpretation is literal (it is hard to believe it is), any sane and
intelligent human would have realized that since an ancient medieval
ignorant society or person wrote it, one would have instantly dismissed
the Qu'ran as a hoax.
The Qu'ran did inadvertently get half the story right; Humans do
descend from apes; although its not clear if pigs descended from apes
as well. Maybe apes descended from pigs. Nevertheless, in due course,
scientist will reveal the answer.
If you are a Muslim you have two choices. If you choose to speak out
against terrorism you support the western culture of freedom of all
things innately human. If you are a Muslim and choose to remain silent
you are against western civilized freedoms and therefore are seen
supporting unconditionally, the dysfunctionally ignorant, oppressive,
na=EFve, bigoted, racists, genocidal murderous fanatic lunatics within
the Muslim flock.
.
|
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: BUSHKULT REALLY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION |
18 May 2006 09:26:14 AM |
|
|
Bush and Cheney are killing more people than
any followers of Islam.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kirtland" |
|
| Title: Re: BUSHKULT REALLY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION |
19 May 2006 01:21:00 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 18 May 2006 10:26:14 -0400, * US * wrote:
Bush and Cheney are killing more people than
any followers of Islam.
But he's bringing them "freedom" and "democracy". What a joke.........
.
|
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: BUSHKULT REALLY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION |
19 May 2006 07:49:02 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 19 May 2006 06:21:00 GMT, kirtland <kland@noway.org> wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2006 10:26:14 -0400, * US * wrote:
Bush and Cheney are killing more people than
any followers of Islam.
But he's bringing them "freedom" and "democracy". What a joke...
Indeed.
It'd be funnier if he weren't pillaging the US treasury
and destroying freedom/democracy here, too ...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
