Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders



 Politics > Politics-USA > Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Charles Farley"
Date: 09 Nov 2004 10:26:49 PM
Object: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders
Excerpt:
"There will be no mercy" said a document that the killer had
held over van Gogh's chest before skewering it there with a
final knife blow to his heart.
By then van Gogh, 47, had been shot several times and was
seen by one witness on his knees, pleading with his assailant,
"Don't do it ... we can still talk about it."
The response was a knife to the throat. The killer sawed
through the neck and spinal column, almost to the point of
decapitating him.
The London Times
November 7, 2004
Jihad wrecks Dutch race harmony
By Matthew Campbell
When Geert Wilders, a Dutch politician, collected his post from the
letterbox on Wednesday he got an unpleasant surprise. Among the bills
and junk mail was a letter addressing him as "ugly dog". It told him
he would soon be beheaded.
It was an unnerving way to start the day. Only 24 hours earlier Theo
van Gogh, the film maker who had often criticised radical Muslims, had
been riding along on his bicycle when a Muslim fanatic first shot and
then butchered him on a busy street with the nonchalance of a
slaughterhouse worker.
Now other people were being targeted, too, as evidence emerged of a
"brigade" of Dutch jihadists preparing to murder "the enemies of
Islam" in a terror campaign that would be easier to carry out than the
bombing of trains or heavily guarded government buildings.
"Do not think you are safe," said the letter to Wilders, who had been
planning to set up a party to help to tackle the "Islamic problem" in
Holland, "because we will catch you and cut off your ugly head."
He was not the only one to be threatened. "There will be no mercy"
said a document that the killer had held over van Gogh's chest before
skewering it there with a final knife blow to his heart.
By then van Gogh, 47, had been shot several times and was seen by one
witness on his knees, pleading with his assailant, "Don't do it ... we
can still talk about it."
The response was a knife to the throat. The killer sawed through the
neck and spinal column, almost to the point of decapitating him.
Wilders has been taken into protective police custody along with Ayaan
Hirsi Ali, a liberal MP of Somali origin who also appeared on the
list. Her offence was to call herself an ex-Muslim and jointly to
produce with van Gogh a film about the Islamic oppression of women.
The Dutch are not alone in their worries. All over Europe media
pundits, entertainers and politicians are forced to ponder the
chilling possibility that cross-border co-operation among closely
connected jihad cells might mean that they, too, were threatened by
the new terror.
For some Dutch officials it was evidence of a social experiment gone
horribly wrong. "We were naive in thinking people would exist in
society together," said Rita Verdonk, the immigration and integration
minister whose name also appears on the death list.
She added that Moroccan immigrants "have never learnt about Dutch
values", despite efforts to train them to respect the country's mores.
It is hardly surprising. Many of Holland's one million Muslims
consider the Dutch government to be depraved in its acceptance of
"abominations" such as drugs, prostitution and gay marriage. They want
nothing to do with it.
At the same time, Dutch tolerance no longer extends so readily these
days to immigration and religious diversity. In graffiti scrawled on
walls all over the city, the message is seen repeatedly, "Go home if
you don't like it".
That was what Ahmed Aboutaleb, the Muslim deputy mayor of Amsterdam,
would tell them when he was invited to talk to Muslim groups -- and it
was enough to get his name put on the hit list as well.
Also named was Job Cohen, the mayor. Then a newspaper received a
telephone call in heavily accented Dutch adding the name of Frits
Barend, a television chat show host, to the list.
The day would come, said the note found on van Gogh's body, when
"hair-raising screams will be squeezed from the lungs of the
non-believers -- the sword will be lifted against them". Enough to
give pause to anybody thinking of having a poke at an imam. Free
speech itself seemed to be under assault.
"Democracy is threatened," said Hein Donner, the justice minister, who
was horrified to learn from investigators that nine other people had
been arrested as well as the killer and were suspected of being part
of what one official called a "brigade of Islamic martyrs" preparing
to slit the throats of critics.
Tensions rose. Shouting matches erupted between Moroccans and Dutch
people at the scene of van Gogh's killing where well-wishers left a
carpet of flowers and handwritten notes, some of them angrily calling
for more control on radical Muslims.
At one point a car filled with dark-skinned young men pulled up
alongside the shrine. The windows came down to the sound of blaring
Arab music and whoops of delight from the passengers. Dutch men paying
their respects to van Gogh, a grandson of the famous artist's brother,
yelled at them to move on.
The killer, who the police referred to only as "Mohammed B", attended
the Al Tawheed mosque, considered a hotbed of radicalism. Its imam
refers to Christians and Jews as "kindling for hell fire" and says
homosexuals should be thrown off tall buildings, preferably head
first.
The killer had also befriended Samir Azzouz, an internationally
connected "holy warrior" accused of planning to blow up, among other
targets, Amsterdam's Schiphol airport. They stayed at a string of
addresses together, watching "jihad movies", investigators said.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-1347473_2,00.html
.

User: "BushkaBob"

Title: I can think of another filmmaker I'd rather see turned over to amob. 12 Nov 2004 06:22:59 PM
Michael Moore - Come out, come out, wherever you are.
.

User: "BuzzBoy"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 09 Nov 2004 11:10:36 PM
Muslims?
These thugs are sand niggers who deserve death
Hang them by the neck until dead and place their body on display wrapped
in bacon
Charles Farley wrote:

Excerpt:

"There will be no mercy" said a document that the killer had
held over van Gogh's chest before skewering it there with a
final knife blow to his heart.

By then van Gogh, 47, had been shot several times and was
seen by one witness on his knees, pleading with his assailant,
"Don't do it ... we can still talk about it."

The response was a knife to the throat. The killer sawed
through the neck and spinal column, almost to the point of
decapitating him.




The London Times
November 7, 2004

Jihad wrecks Dutch race harmony

By Matthew Campbell

When Geert Wilders, a Dutch politician, collected his post from the
letterbox on Wednesday he got an unpleasant surprise. Among the bills
and junk mail was a letter addressing him as "ugly dog". It told him
he would soon be beheaded.

It was an unnerving way to start the day. Only 24 hours earlier Theo
van Gogh, the film maker who had often criticised radical Muslims, had
been riding along on his bicycle when a Muslim fanatic first shot and
then butchered him on a busy street with the nonchalance of a
slaughterhouse worker.

Now other people were being targeted, too, as evidence emerged of a
"brigade" of Dutch jihadists preparing to murder "the enemies of
Islam" in a terror campaign that would be easier to carry out than the
bombing of trains or heavily guarded government buildings.

"Do not think you are safe," said the letter to Wilders, who had been
planning to set up a party to help to tackle the "Islamic problem" in
Holland, "because we will catch you and cut off your ugly head."

He was not the only one to be threatened. "There will be no mercy"
said a document that the killer had held over van Gogh's chest before
skewering it there with a final knife blow to his heart.

By then van Gogh, 47, had been shot several times and was seen by one
witness on his knees, pleading with his assailant, "Don't do it ... we
can still talk about it."

The response was a knife to the throat. The killer sawed through the
neck and spinal column, almost to the point of decapitating him.

Wilders has been taken into protective police custody along with Ayaan
Hirsi Ali, a liberal MP of Somali origin who also appeared on the
list. Her offence was to call herself an ex-Muslim and jointly to
produce with van Gogh a film about the Islamic oppression of women.

The Dutch are not alone in their worries. All over Europe media
pundits, entertainers and politicians are forced to ponder the
chilling possibility that cross-border co-operation among closely
connected jihad cells might mean that they, too, were threatened by
the new terror.

For some Dutch officials it was evidence of a social experiment gone
horribly wrong. "We were naive in thinking people would exist in
society together," said Rita Verdonk, the immigration and integration
minister whose name also appears on the death list.

She added that Moroccan immigrants "have never learnt about Dutch
values", despite efforts to train them to respect the country's mores.

It is hardly surprising. Many of Holland's one million Muslims
consider the Dutch government to be depraved in its acceptance of
"abominations" such as drugs, prostitution and gay marriage. They want
nothing to do with it.

At the same time, Dutch tolerance no longer extends so readily these
days to immigration and religious diversity. In graffiti scrawled on
walls all over the city, the message is seen repeatedly, "Go home if
you don't like it".

That was what Ahmed Aboutaleb, the Muslim deputy mayor of Amsterdam,
would tell them when he was invited to talk to Muslim groups -- and it
was enough to get his name put on the hit list as well.

Also named was Job Cohen, the mayor. Then a newspaper received a
telephone call in heavily accented Dutch adding the name of Frits
Barend, a television chat show host, to the list.

The day would come, said the note found on van Gogh's body, when
"hair-raising screams will be squeezed from the lungs of the
non-believers -- the sword will be lifted against them". Enough to
give pause to anybody thinking of having a poke at an imam. Free
speech itself seemed to be under assault.

"Democracy is threatened," said Hein Donner, the justice minister, who
was horrified to learn from investigators that nine other people had
been arrested as well as the killer and were suspected of being part
of what one official called a "brigade of Islamic martyrs" preparing
to slit the throats of critics.

Tensions rose. Shouting matches erupted between Moroccans and Dutch
people at the scene of van Gogh's killing where well-wishers left a
carpet of flowers and handwritten notes, some of them angrily calling
for more control on radical Muslims.

At one point a car filled with dark-skinned young men pulled up
alongside the shrine. The windows came down to the sound of blaring
Arab music and whoops of delight from the passengers. Dutch men paying
their respects to van Gogh, a grandson of the famous artist's brother,
yelled at them to move on.

The killer, who the police referred to only as "Mohammed B", attended
the Al Tawheed mosque, considered a hotbed of radicalism. Its imam
refers to Christians and Jews as "kindling for hell fire" and says
homosexuals should be thrown off tall buildings, preferably head
first.

The killer had also befriended Samir Azzouz, an internationally
connected "holy warrior" accused of planning to blow up, among other
targets, Amsterdam's Schiphol airport. They stayed at a string of
addresses together, watching "jihad movies", investigators said.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-1347473_2,00.html

.
User: "Professor"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 10 Nov 2004 12:09:19 AM
"BuzzBoy" <planetj7@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Gnhkd.4898$WC6.763@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

Muslims?

These thugs are sand niggers who deserve death

Hang them by the neck until dead and place their body on display wrapped
in bacon

Expressing such abominable sentiments discredits your cause.
.
User: "Fg"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 10 Nov 2004 09:33:23 AM
"Professor" <vze3vvj2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:jgikd.1922$uT1.1418@trndny03...

"BuzzBoy" <planetj7@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Gnhkd.4898$WC6.763@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

Muslims?

These thugs are sand niggers who deserve death

Hang them by the neck until dead and place their body on display wrapped
in bacon


Expressing such abominable sentiments discredits your cause.

i'll say. this person is full-on eating what the propaganda machine feeds...
.

User: "ShoNuff"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 10 Nov 2004 04:04:19 PM
I agree. But it IS a fun thought anyway!
"Professor" <vze3vvj2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:jgikd.1922$uT1.1418@trndny03...

"BuzzBoy" <planetj7@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Gnhkd.4898$WC6.763@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

Muslims?

These thugs are sand niggers who deserve death

Hang them by the neck until dead and place their body on display wrapped
in bacon


Expressing such abominable sentiments discredits your cause.


.
User: "Libs R Useless"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 10 Nov 2004 04:08:42 PM
And it's certainly no more offensive or abominable than "***** Christ" or
"Dung Mary", two recent works of Leftist "art" that the Libruls applauded
heartily.
"ShoNuff" <shonuff@papernapkin.net> wrote in message
news:xfwkd.1492$IZ2.413@lakeread06...

I agree. But it IS a fun thought anyway!


"Professor" <vze3vvj2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:jgikd.1922$uT1.1418@trndny03...

"BuzzBoy" <planetj7@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Gnhkd.4898$WC6.763@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

Muslims?

These thugs are sand niggers who deserve death

Hang them by the neck until dead and place their body on display wrapped
in bacon


Expressing such abominable sentiments discredits your cause.




.
User: "J Dubya"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 10 Nov 2004 07:18:41 PM
Libs R Useless wrote:

And it's certainly no more offensive or abominable than "***** Christ" or
"Dung Mary", two recent works of Leftist "art" that the Libruls applauded
heartily.

Not that you care, but neither work is recent. Andres Serrano
did "***** Christ" back in 1989, and Chris Ofili did "Dung Mary"
back in 1999.
Most Liberals I know who know about these works did not
applaud them, as they are merely profaning the sacred,
and as a form of artistic expression are (& were at the time)
trite & derivative. I.e., no new ideas here; move along.
Of course, I don't think either should be banned--
freedom of expression and all that.
-J Dubya
.
User: "bill"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 11 Nov 2004 01:09:53 AM
In article <d5zkd.8055$UH3.2987@fe61.usenetserver.com>,
J Dubya <jbwinston@gmail.com> wrote:

Libs R Useless wrote:

And it's certainly no more offensive or abominable than "***** Christ" or
"Dung Mary", two recent works of Leftist "art" that the Libruls applauded
heartily.


Not that you care, but neither work is recent. Andres Serrano
did "***** Christ" back in 1989, and Chris Ofili did "Dung Mary"
back in 1999.

Most Liberals I know who know about these works did not
applaud them, as they are merely profaning the sacred,
and as a form of artistic expression are (& were at the time)
trite & derivative. I.e., no new ideas here; move along.

Of course, I don't think either should be banned--
freedom of expression and all that.

-J Dubya

I also wouldn't ban it but how about some Democrats stand up once in a
while and call a ***** smeared whatever a ***** smeared whatever.
Instead I see news articles where liberals applaud the "art" and the
guts it took to smear ***** on something.
***** belongs in the toilet. We've all flushed masterpieces.
When they do it to an object because of someones faith isn't that what
liberals call a hate crime?
.



User: "Professor"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 10 Nov 2004 04:13:52 PM
Congratulations, you are officially a disgusting bigot. Your mother must be
so proud.
"ShoNuff" <shonuff@papernapkin.net> wrote in message
news:xfwkd.1492$IZ2.413@lakeread06...

I agree. But it IS a fun thought anyway!

"Professor" <vze3vvj2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:jgikd.1922$uT1.1418@trndny03...

"BuzzBoy" <planetj7@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Gnhkd.4898$WC6.763@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

Muslims?

These thugs are sand niggers who deserve death

Hang them by the neck until dead and place their body on display

wrapped

in bacon


Expressing such abominable sentiments discredits your cause.




.
User: "Libs R Useless"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 10 Nov 2004 04:49:43 PM
Congratulations, YOU are officially a dumb Librul. YOUR mother undoubtedly
wishes you had never been born.
"Professor" <vze3vvj2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:Aowkd.2126$uT1.659@trndny03...

Congratulations, you are officially a disgusting bigot. Your mother must
be
so proud.

"ShoNuff" <shonuff@papernapkin.net> wrote in message
news:xfwkd.1492$IZ2.413@lakeread06...

I agree. But it IS a fun thought anyway!

"Professor" <vze3vvj2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:jgikd.1922$uT1.1418@trndny03...

"BuzzBoy" <planetj7@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Gnhkd.4898$WC6.763@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

Muslims?

These thugs are sand niggers who deserve death

Hang them by the neck until dead and place their body on display

wrapped

in bacon


Expressing such abominable sentiments discredits your cause.






.
User: "J Dubya"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 10 Nov 2004 07:20:00 PM
Libs R Useless wrote:

Congratulations, YOU are officially a dumb Librul. YOUR mother undoubtedly
wishes you had never been born.

Does your mother know what you do on her computer
while she's at work?
-J Dubya
.


User: "ShoNuff"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 12 Nov 2004 03:57:56 PM
She is!
"Professor" <vze3vvj2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:Aowkd.2126$uT1.659@trndny03...

Congratulations, you are officially a disgusting bigot. Your mother must
be
so proud.

"ShoNuff" <shonuff@papernapkin.net> wrote in message
news:xfwkd.1492$IZ2.413@lakeread06...

I agree. But it IS a fun thought anyway!

"Professor" <vze3vvj2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:jgikd.1922$uT1.1418@trndny03...

"BuzzBoy" <planetj7@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:Gnhkd.4898$WC6.763@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

Muslims?

These thugs are sand niggers who deserve death

Hang them by the neck until dead and place their body on display

wrapped

in bacon


Expressing such abominable sentiments discredits your cause.






.





User: "Topaz"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 11 Nov 2004 02:10:29 PM
The Jews Are Our Misfortune
By Dr. William Pierce
If you've been listening to many of my broadcasts you will know that
the
issue I talk about most often is that of media control. In nearly
every
broadcast I have pointed out that the people who control the mass
media
of news and entertainment are able to manipulate the opinions and
attitudes of about 95 per cent of the population. I have pointed out
that the media bosses do this manipulation deliberately and in
collusion
with one another, taking advantage of the compelling need most people
have to conform their ideas and their behavior to a perceived norm.
The media bosses use their control over the mass media of
entertainment
-- and to a lesser extent over the news media -- to create an
artificial
norm that is presented to the public through television, motion
pictures, advertising, and other media, and this artificial norm is
the
one perceived as real by most of the public. Through their control of
public opinion the media bosses also control the democratic political
process and governmental policy in a way that is advantageous to them
and disadvantageous to the White public. And these media bosses are
overwhelmingly Jews.
That has been the message I have presented over and over again in many
of these broadcasts. I have talked about different facets of Jewish
media control and have presented different specifics, different
details,
in various broadcasts. I've discussed a number of different Hollywood
films or television shows as specific examples of the way in which the
Jews use their media control to brainwash the public, to promote
fashions and styles and behavior that are harmful to our people but
that
advance the long-term schemes of the Jews to further dominate and
exploit our society.
(Some of this may be outdated today, but it still explains why things
are the way they are)
I've talked about specific Jews who control various segments of the
mass
media, and I've pointed out specific instances of the destructive way
in
which they use their control. I've talked about the Jewish media boss
Sumner Redstone and his control of MTV and CBS and the Hollywood film
studio Paramount Pictures. I've talked about the Jewish media boss
Michael Eisner and his control of the Disney Company and ABC. I've
talked about the Jewish media boss Gerald Levin and his control of
Time
Warner and CNN. I've talked about the Jewish media boss Edgar Bronfman
and his control of the largest segment of the popular music industry
and
Universal Studios in Hollywood. And I've talked about dozens of other
Jewish media bosses and the media they control and the specific ways
in
which they use those media. In particular, during the past few months
I've talked about several recent Hollywood films which deliberately
target teenaged White girls and brainwash them with the notion that it
is fashionable for them to have sex with Black males.
And of course, I've talked about the Jewish control of the news media
as
well as the entertainment media. In a way similar to their use of the
entertainment media to set popular fashions, the Jewish media bosses
distort and censor the news in order to give the public a distorted
picture of what is happening in the world. I've given several very
specific examples of this Jewish management of the news in recent
months.
I've talked about the total blackout at the national level of the news
of the atrocious rape and massacre of Whites in Wichita, Kansas, by
Blacks last December, and I've talked about the almost total
suppression
of the news of the Black racial attacks on Whites in Seattle in the
Mardi Gras riot at the end of February this year. I also talked about
the downplaying of the racial aspects of the Black rioting in
Cincinnati
in April of this year, about the failure of the news media outside the
immediate Cincinnati area to mention the deliberate targeting of
Whites,
especially White women, by the Black rioters. And I described the
gross
distortions in the news coverage of the racial politics in York,
Pennsylvania, that led to the current White mayor of York being
charged
in May with the killing of a Black during a Black race riot in York 32
years ago.
I have pointed out repeatedly how all of this suppression of the news
and distortion of the news is aimed at creating and maintaining a
false
picture in the public mind of racial conflict in the United States. In
this false picture Whites always are the aggressors, Blacks or other
non-Whites are the innocent victims, and the root of all racial
conflict
is White racism.
In a number of my broadcasts I've discussed at length why the Jews do
what they do: why they use their media control in such a deceptive and
destructive way, what their motives are. I've also talked about how
they
collaborate. I've pointed out that their propaganda policies are not
formulated independently, but that they have a coherent party line
that
they all follow. I've given a number of specific examples of this.
Well, all of these things that I've talked about have not gone
unnoticed
by the Jewish media bosses themselves. When people expose their
activities or their scheming they pay attention. In particular, they
have been paying attention to these American Dissident Voices
broadcasts
and to the work of my organization, the National Alliance. They read
what's on our Web sites at natvan.com and natall.com and
resistance.com,
and they talk about it among themselves. This shows up pretty clearly
in
the uniform way in which their media respond to us. Whether it's the
Associated Press or Time magazine or the Washington Post or a
television
news commentator anywhere in the United States, they always use the
same
phrasing in talking about us. They always use the word "hate" in
referring to us. They always say that the National Alliance is the
"most
dangerous organized hate group" in America, despite the fact that all
we
do is disseminate to the public the truth about what they're doing.
That's what they regard as "dangerous" and as "hate."
If you want to see a current indicator of the fact that they do think
about us, go to the Web site promoting Steven Spielberg's new movie,
A.I. There you'll see a parody of a part of the National Alliance's
Web
site in the form of a page headed "Who Is the Anti-Robot Militia?"
It's
obviously copied, almost word for word, from the page "Who Is the
National Alliance?" on our Web site. It's difficult for me to
understand
what they hoped to accomplish with this parody. Perhaps they believe
that it will make people take us less seriously.
Somewhat less quirky but much more directly deceptive are their
standard
smokescreen responses. It used to be that whenever I would raise the
issue of Jewish monopoly control of the mass media of news and
entertainment during an interview or on a call-in program, I would
hear
the response from a Jew or an apologist for the Jews: "What about Ted
Turner? He's not a Jew," as if that negated everything I had said. Of
course, that response was used before Ted Turner's CNN was taken over
by
the very Jewish Time Warner. And now that Ted Turner has been eased
out
of all decision-making positions in the cable news network he built
and
has been replaced by Jews, one doesn't hear the Ted Turner response
any
longer.
The standard responses today, the ones I hear as often as I used to
hear
the Ted Turner response, are the "it's the shareholders" and the "it's
the big bankers." Whenever I start naming names -- whenever I begin
talking about the control over the media wielded by Michael Eisner or
Sumner Redstone, for example, a Jew will pop up with the response:
"Those guys don't control the media. It's the shareholders who control
the media. Eisner and Redstone are just employees. The shareholders
tell
them what to do." A variation on this theme is, "Eisner and Redstone
don't own the media. It's the big banks that own all of the media, and
most of the big bankers are Gentiles."
Well, of course, that's not really true, and they know it's not true.
The big Jewish media bosses are mostly quite autonomous. Sumner
Redstone, for example, owns outright two-thirds of the shares in his
media empire. His personal fortune is more than 12 billion dollars,
according to Forbes magazine this month. I'm quite sure he doesn't
check
with any shareholders before he dreams up some new piece of
race-mixing
filth for MTV.
As for Gentile bankers telling the Jewish media bosses what kind of
propaganda they must produce for the public, that's total nonsense. I
haven't yet done a study of the investment banking industry to
determine
what percentage of Jews and what percentage of Gentiles are involved
in
it, but one thing that's certain is that the Gentile bankers would
faint
dead away at the thought of telling Jewish media bosses such as
Michael
Eisner or the Sulzberger family or the Newhouses or Sumner Redstone to
cut back on the race-mixing propaganda. Gentile bankers as a class are
rich, deracinated capons, whose only interest is money.
Every Jewish propaganda medium -- CBS or MTV or Time magazine or the
New
York Times -- is staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and they all
know
what they're doing. They work as a tribe, as a swarm of termites
gnawing
at the foundations of our existence. There is total agreement among
the
media Jews as to the general thrust of their propaganda. They may
disagree on many of the details -- they may even compete against each
other for a bigger slice of the media pie -- but all agree on the
general goals of degrading and subverting Gentile civilization, of
corrupting Gentile institutions, of mongrelizing our race. Again, the
Jews work as a tribe, and that is the source of their strength and
their
success.
Gentile bankers, on the other hand, work only for themselves. They
would
not dream of combining and using their financial strength to protect
our
people from the Jews. They are terrified of the Jews, of the media.
The
more money they have, the more selfish and the more cowardly they are.
The huge difference, the decisive difference, between the Jews and our
people is that they work as a tribe, and we work as individuals. They
work together, rich Jews and poor Jews, for their common tribal
interests, against us, and until now we have failed to organize
effectively to defend ourselves against them.
Anyway, my point is that their defense against my exposure of their
activities and their power over our government is orchestrated -- that
is, they've all gotten together and decided what their defense will be
-- and it's a deliberate lie. As I continue to expose the destructive
activities of the Jewish media bosses, you will continue to hear them
and their apologists respond that they really don't have any power,
that
it's the Gentile shareholders and the Gentile bankers who control the
media. A lot of dimwits will believe that lie. A lot of couch
potatoes,
a lot of soccer moms, a lot of baseball fans, a lot of lemmings, will
believe that it's not the Jew Sumner Redstone who deliberately uses
MTV
to corrupt White teenagers; instead it's some cabal of Gentile
shareholders and Gentile bankers who tell him what to do, and Redstone
is only an employee who follows their orders.
I think it's time for us to orchestrate our exposure of the Jewish
media. I think it's about time for the public, lemmings and all, to
begin hearing a uniform charge against them, a uniform statement of
our
opposition to them. How about this: The Jews are our misfortune.
That's
simple, and it's true, and it's easy to remember. Repeat after me: The
Jews are our misfortune. Let's use that statement. Let's let everyone
hear it. Let's impress it on everyone's consciousness: The Jews are
our
misfortune.
Of course, when I say the Jews are our misfortune, I'm not talking
only
about the Jewish media bosses. I'm not talking only about the Jews at
the top, such as Sumner Redstone and the Sulzbergers and Michael
Eisner
and the others who formulate and direct the propaganda line against
Gentile society; I'm talking about the whole tribe, and I believe that
message comes across in the statement, the Jews are our misfortune.
Let
me tell you what the standard lemming response will be to that
statement, the response that they have been taught and will parrot
back.
First, from the religious lemmings it will be something like this:
"Oh,
no, the Jews aren't our misfortune, we owe everything to the Jews.
Don't
you know that Jesus was a Jew and God was his father? That makes God a
Jew. We must do what the Jews tell us. They are God's people." I'm
sure
that argument is embarrassing to some of the more sophisticated
apologists for the Jews, but many Christian Fundamentalists use it,
and
I've heard it often.

From the secular lemmings it will be more like: "Don't you know that

Freud and Einstein and Salk were Jews? We wouldn't have a space
program
if it weren't for Einstein. We wouldn't have a cure for polio if it
weren't for Salk. The Jews are our fortune, not our misfortune." Well,
of course, our space program has practically nothing to do with
Einstein
or his Jewishness. Gentile thinkers envisioned it and pioneered both
its
theoretical basis and its practical development. The German
theoretician, Hermann Oberth, and the Russian, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky,
were two of the Gentiles who independently demonstrated mathematically
the feasibility of space travel in the early years of the last
century.
The American rocket pioneer Robert Goddard and the German Wernher von
Braun designed actual rockets and built the vehicles which were the
precursors of today's space ships. Jews didn't become involved until
it
became glamorous and profitable. And the development of a polio
vaccine
hardly would have missed a beat if Jonas Salk had gone into the
garment
business instead of medicine. He was one of a team, and he got the
credit for the work of others as well as for his own work.
The reasons we hear these silly and groundless claims in the first
place
about how much we owe the Jews -- the reasons are Jewish media control
and Jewish tribalism, Jewish support for their own. Freud was given
the
enormous buildup he received for his theorizing about anal
personalities
and penis envy and the like because he was a Jew, not because of any
genuine merit in his theorizing. Other Jewish writers recognized him
as
one of their own and propelled him to a position of undeserved
authority, and his theories ultimately did an enormous amount of
damage
to the development of our understanding of psychology and mental
disease. Einstein was a competent mathematical physicist, but a great
deal of the publicity he received was based on the fact that he was a
Jew rather than on the merits of his work. As in the case of Salk,
Jewish publicists gave Einstein credit for the work of others as well
as
for his own work.
What we must do is look at the balance sheet. Is the damage done to
our
race by Karl Marx and all of his Jewish followers in the communist
movement -- the selective murder of more than 30 million of the best
of
our people in Europe during the past century -- offset by whatever
contributions Einstein and Salk and other Jews have made -- even if
they
did everything their Jewish boosters claim for them? Certainly, there
have been many other Jews who were competent and creative engineers
and
scientists besides Einstein and Salk. Not every clever Jew became a
lawyer or a scriptwriter or a pawn shop owner or a middleman. Some
became chemists or mathematicians or physicists. But can all of them
together make up for the mass murders Lazar Kaganovich perpetrated
aginst the Ukrainians, for the rapes and murders of German civilians
instigated by Ilya Ehrenburg, for the Eastern European girls still
being
forced into sexual slavery on a huge scale today by Israeli slave
dealers?
I think not. And I have not yet put on the balance sheet what the
Jewish
masters of America's mass media have done and are doing to us. What
can
possibly compensate White Americans for the deliberate, malevolent
corruption of our young people by just one Jewish gangster like Sumner
Redstone and his MTV? The race-mixing, culture-destroying, hip-hop
filth
churned out by Sumner Redstone's MTV seven days a week is the single
most destructive influence in American life today. And of course,
Redstone doesn't produce this filth all by himself. He has thousands
of
Jews working for him at every level, not only in MTV but also in CBS
and
in Paramount Pictures and in all of his other media properties.
And although MTV, targeting White teenagers as it does, may seem the
most blatantly and maliciously destructive of the Jewish media, it is
hardly much worse than some of the filth being poured into the minds
of
the American public by Michael Eisner's Disney empire: especially by
its
Miramax films division under the Weinstein brothers. The fact that
much
of the entertainment produced by Eisner's Disney Company is relatively
innocuous does not compensate for the fact that some of it is pure
poison. The poison is being introduced gradually, more and more each
year, and it is having its effect. When the Disney Company was
entirely
a Gentile company a few years ago, its output of entertainment may
sometimes have been excessively bland, but none of it was poison
designed to corrupt White Americans.
And what can possibly compensate on our balance sheet for what the
Jewish news media are doing in their deliberate, calculated distortion
of the picture of the world seen by the American public. It is a
picture
which has been designed to confuse White Americans, to undermine their
self-confidence, to induce feelings of racial guilt in them. Just one
example: the systematic suppression of the news of Black crimes
against
White people and the exaggeration of the news of every White crime
against non-Whites is not a fluke. It is done routinely by all of the
Jewish news media: by the New York Times, by the Washington Post, by
Time magazine and Newsweek magazine, by CNN and ABC News and CBS News
and NBC News and all the rest. And interracial crime is just one
issue.
The relations between the sexes; immigration; the foreign relations of
the United States with the rest of the world, especially in the Middle
East; and a hundred other important issues are similarly distorted in
their portrayal by the media. This deliberate distortion of the
public's
view of the world has done irreparable damage to the American system
of
government and to American society. And again: the distortion has been
deliberate, planned, systematic, and intended to do harm to us. No
number of funny Jewish comedians, or successful Jewish entrepreneurs
in
Silicon Valley or on Wall Street, or clever Jewish medical researchers
can compensate for this harm.
When we look at the balance sheet the conclusion is clear beyond any
doubt: the Jews are our misfortune. It's way past time for us to
accept
this conclusion, to overcome our fears of being labeled "anti-Semitic"
for accepting this conclusion, to brush aside these fears which have
been instilled in us by the propaganda of the mass media, and then to
begin working to improve our fortunes.
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.altermedia.info http://www.RealNews247.com
.
User: "Bert Hyman"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 11 Nov 2004 02:35:52 PM
In news:onh7p0pf1ibcubmac83t2hv2m0s9ip0tf1@4ax.com Topaz
<mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote:

The Jews Are Our Misfortune

Because they keep pointing out what absolute, blithering idiots you all
are?
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@visi.com
.
User: "Topaz"

Title: Re: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 11 Nov 2004 05:31:52 PM
The following is from:
<http://home.att.ne.jp/moon/fischer/list/p_54/54_0.htm>:
[Note: I have changed instances of '?g' and '?h' to double inverted
commas ("), instances of '?f' to apostrophes ('), instances of '?c' to
exclamation marks (!), and I have also inserted paragraph breaks -
more
exactly, double line breaks - where there are line breaks in the
original]
***BEGIN ARTICLE***
On July 13th 2004 at about 5:25 p.m. Robert James Fischer("Bobby"
Fischer) entered the Japanese immigration dept. on his way to Japan
Airlines flight JL 745 departing from Tokyo/Narita airport at 6:20
p.m.
for Manila Philippines. Bobby gave the immigration lady his passport
and she quickly stamped his exit visa. However he'd forgotten to fill
out the immigration departure form. She told him to fill it out at a
nearby writing stand. He took it over there and filled it out. But
when Bobby returned a couple of minutes later an immigration man had
replaced her. Bobby gave him back his passport and the filled out
immigration form. However when the immigration man put his passport
under a special light a beep went off or was set off and Bobby was
detained. Bobby was asked to take a nearby seat while they found out
what was the problem. Bobby took the seat and as he was waiting he
heard someone on the phone fiercely barking instructions to an
immigration official. The immigration official kept repeating in a
loud
militaristic manner "hai, hai!" After Bobby had waited there about 15
minutes or so he told the immigration official talking on the plone
that
his plane was leaving shortly and that he didn't want to miss the
flight. By now all pretense of civility was gone and the immigration
official fairly shouted at Bobby "I know that sit down!" and went
back
to his ***** phone call. After waiting there on his seat for about
half an hour or so altogether Bobby was told to accompany various
immigration security officials. Bobby went with them through the
office
to the left of the immigration exit counters and then down a ways to
an
elevator. Bobby and the security officials took the elevator down at
least one floor. Then Bobby and the immigration security officials
took
a long walk down the dark and narrow corridor to Bobby was told not
where. The atmosphere had turned threatening, foreboding, hostile and
sinister. The place was completely apart and isolated from other
passengers. There were only immigration types. Bobby asked "Where
are
we going?" He was told they were going to an office to talk. Bobby
stopped walking and said "What's the problem?" Bobby was told that he
should just go to the office to talk. Bobby said "About what?" Bobby
was told "We just talk." At some stage a young extremely fat half
Japanese and half Latino translator made his portly appearance. By
now
Bobby said "I'm not moving until I know what this is all about."
Bobby
tried to start walking in the direction of where he'd come from. He
was
blocked by a smirking young immigration security type. Bobby was now
surrounded by about at least 4 or 5 immigration security types plus
the
translator. The security types kept coming and going but overall
their
number slowly increased! Bobby demanded to know if he was under
arrest
and if so what were the charges against him. Bobby said he wasn't
moving until he found out what this was all about. Over and over and
over again Bobby was asked if he wished to see someone from the U.S.
embassy. Bobby was told he had a right to contact the U.S. embassy.
Bobby was told maybe they can help you. Bobby always answered
immediately and vehemently and with finality that he did not wish to
see
anyone from the U.S. embassy nor did he wish to contact the U.S.
embassy. Bobby explained that the U.S. embassy was itself the problem
not the solution. Bobby explained that the U.S. government is evil
and
that they were out to "get" him. Even the translator conceded to
Bobby
in Spanish that in his opinion Bush is a monster! Bobby asked to call
friend many times but they refused.
After everyone was standing in the hallway for about 45 minutes or so
a
half-crazed security official came out with Bobby's passport and they
showed Bobby what they said was his arrest warrant. But they wouldn't
let Bobby touch it. It appeared to be a 2 page document. It was in
Japanese and English. Bobby tried to read the first page from a
distance but only got a glimpse of the second page. The first page
said
that Bobby had illegally entered Japan and illegally left Japan!!!
Bobby asked "When did I illegally enter Japan?" He was told it was
all
there on the arrest warrant. Bobby said "Where's the date I illegally
entered?" Bobby said maybe it's in Japanese but that he didn't see it
in English. They said it's there in English too. They said that
everything on the arrest warrant was in Japanese and English. If the
date when Bobby allegedly illegally entered Japan was in English or
western numerals Bobby sure didn't see it. The older half-crazed
higher
level immigration official told Bobby that his passport was not valid?
Bobby said "Since when is it not valid?" You mean it was not valid
when
I entered Japan a few months ago?" The kook answered "That's right!"
Bobby continued "It wasn't valid when I entered Japan 3 months ago?
Since when hasn't it been valid." The kook answered "Oh, long before
that!" Bobby pressed on "Since when hasn't been valid?" The kook
answered since last November!!!
The kook said that the U.S. government told them that Bobby's passport
wasn't valid since then. The kooky higher level immigration official
then took out his immigration stamp and stamped Bobby's entry visa and
Bobby's exit visa in the passport invalid. All this without any
investigation or getting Bobby's side of the story. Simply on the
word
of the great United States! Bobby found all of this to be slightly
incredible because Bobby's passport was perfectly valid in every way
with about 2 and half years left on it till it expired on January 23rd
of 2007. Furthermore in October and November of 2003 Bobby had
personally visited the Bern, Switzerland U.S. embassy(the same U.S.
embassy that had originally issued the 10 year passport No. Z7792702
to
Bobby on January 24, 1997) because Bobby's passport was almost
completely full with almost no place left for more visa stamps. Bobby
had been sternly advised on several occasions by both Japanese and
Hong
Kong immigration officials that his passport urgently needed to get
more
pages put into it immediately so there would be space for more visa
stamps. In about late October of 2003 Bobby told the people in the
U.S.
embassy at Bern, Switzerland that he needed more pages for his
passport
otherwise he soon wouldn't be able to travel for lack of space to make
visa stamps. After about 10 days and many phone calls back and forth
and at least 2 visits to the embassy in Bern they finally gave Bobby
the
extra pages for his passport.
The embassy at Bern never explained to Bobby's what the delay was all
about except to say that the state department needed time to make the
decision whether or not to give him the extra pages. To Bobby
surprise
on November 6, 2003 they gave him the 20 or so extra page insert which
they professionally bound into his passport free of charge! Such
service! But that was about 8 months ago in neutral Switzerland. Now
Bobby was in U.S. occupied ?excuse US-U.S. controlled Japan. But it
is
highly significant and important to reemphasize that when Bobby
personally presented his perfectly valid U.S. passport No. Z7792702 to
the U.S. Embassy at Bern, Switzerland on November 6, 2003 far from
confiscating and destroying his passport they actually gave him an
about
20 page insert for it! The embassy perfectly sewed the insert into
Bobby's passport themselves in some high-tech manner so that it
appears
to be an integral part of the passport. If Bobby's passport were
"Illegal" or "revoked" or "Invalid" or whatever then one would think
that that was the time for the embassy to make their claim however
false, unlawful and illegal that claim might be! But that would be
overlooking the political dimension to all of this. Obviously the
filthy Jew-controlled U.S. government preferred to illegally and
criminally grab and destroy Bobby's passport only when Bobby was not
in
neutral Switzerland. So instead they planned to do the job elsewhere
at
a time and manner of their own choosing! The U.S. not only wanted to
grab and destroy Bobby's U.S. passport but more importantly they
wanted
to grab and destroy Bobby too. And neutral Switzerland was not the
right place to do it!
By now Bobby felt certain that there was a real possibility of his
being
chained and handcuffed and flown back to the filthy Jew-controlled
U.S.A. with a bag over his head that very night. So he decided not to
go down without a fight! The immigration officials security types and
the translator told Bobby that he was being detained and/or arrested
and
that he had to go with them. Bobby said "No, I'm not moving." At
this
point Bobby was surrounded by a total of about 15 people including the
translator and a young man with a video camera out and filming. At
this
point the immigration security guards made their move and attacked
Bobby. Bobby didn't touch them until they attacked him first. Of
course Bobby was overwhelmed. A short scuffle broke out where Bobby
ended up trying to protect himself, biting one of the guards who was
trying to grab him (but only biting into his heavy shirt), while he
also
swung his legs around to try to stay free from the group of men
attacking him, before they subdued him. They then put a black or brown
bag over Bobby's head and lifted him up by his legs and arms and
carried
him in a horizontal position to wherever they were taking him. Hands
and arms and legs were all over Bobby pummeling him, pushing him,
twisting him, suffocating him. One or more guards was deliberately
inflicting great pain by constantly twisting Bobby's right arm. Bobby
was sure it was going to break but it didn't. Also Bobby felt one or
more guards were trying to put handcuffs on him. Finally Bobby was
dumped into a room where one or more guards was sitting on or
otherwise
putting strong pressure on Bobby's back. All of the air was forced
out
of Bobby's lungs. What very little breathing Bobby could even attempt
to do was also blocked by the black or brown bag on his head. Bobby
shouted over and over again that "I can't breathe, I can't breathe"
but
they paid no attention. Bobby twisted his head back and forth
furiously
all the while shouting "I can't breathe I can't breathe!"
This went on for what seemed like about a minute or two. Bobby only
had
about a second or two left before he would have passed out and/or
died.
Bobby was already thinking: "So this is how I will die. Will my
friends
and loved ones ever really know the truth about how I was murdered?
What will the press say about it? It was all planned this way by the
Jews! It really is true all the horror stories all the "suicides'
all
the murders in custody! It's so damned easy!it's so quick! "Suddenly
after what seemed like an eternity the guy or guys got off of Bobby's
back and he could breathe! Apparently they'd just been taking their
sweet time about robbing Bobby's belongings, taking his belt and shoes
off taking his handcuffs off etc. Maybe they didn't want Bobby to see
the handcuffs. Or maybe one or more of them wanted to kill Bobby but
one or more of them didn't. Whatever Bobby is still alive! The bag
was
gone from Bobby's head the cuffs were off and Bobby was alone in a
prison cell. Bobby's belt was gone and so was his money his wallet,
shoes, etc. The young man continued to video Bobby from outside the
bars for sometime even after the guards left the prison cell. Now
Bobby
had time to survey the damage. His right arm hurt very much but
apparently was not broken. His right wrist was bloodied and bruised
with a good sized gash on the outside part of his right wrist about an
half an inch above the wrist-bone. A number of his teeth had been
chipped or broken or worse in the melee. After the fight Bobby took
out
a piece of one of his teeth and saved it. Bobby's left cheekbone was
also sore and obviously was hurt during the fight. OK. Let's move on
to the next phase.
The next day on July14th 2004 the guards came into Bobby's cell and
told
him that he had a visitor from the U.S. embassy in Tokyo who wanted to
see him. Bobby told them he didn't want to see anyone from the U.S.
embassy. They told Bobby that he had no choice. Bobby refused to go.
They grabbed Bobby by his arms and legs and told Bobby that he was
going
to see the visitor from U.S. embassy whether he liked it or not!
Bobby
was still hurting badly from the night before so he decided to go
without any further struggle. They took Bobby to a room (not the
special "visitors room" where the prisoner and the visitor are
separated
by a glass window) where the U.S. embassy man was either already
there
waiting or else came in a minute or so later. The embassy man did all
the talking while Bobby didn't say a word. He had in front of him on
his side of the table what appeared to be the remnants of Bobby's U.S.
passport. It now had numerous large holes in it along the edges.
Also
something appeared to be stamped on the inside of it. The embassy man
also had a photo copy of a letter or a purported letter to Bobby from
the United States embassy in Manila, Philippines dated December 11,
2003
advising Bobby that his passport was revoked. The embassy man
explained
to Bobby with what can only be described as a deliberate tongue in
cheek
or mock cat that ate the canary look on his face and obvious malicious
glee that since the State department didn't know exactly where to
reach
Bobby they thought that this would be the best chance to notify Bobby
of
the revocation of his passport because they know that Bobby visits the
Philippines from time to time! (Needless to say Bobby had never seen
or
heard of this letter before his forced meeting with the embassy man on
July 14, 2004. We'll have more to say about this letter later on.)
The embassy man further explained to Bobby that the revocation of his
passport would not hinder him from receiving from the U.S. embassy in
Tokyo a one time one trip passport only good to return to the United
States! The embassy man then added that well if Bobby had no further
questions he'd be leaving. Then he looked at Bobby intently and
maliciously and with twinkling eyes shot out: "Well, Mr. Fischer if
you
have no objection I'll be taking your passport back to the embassy
with
me." This was meant to be his coup de grace or piece de resistance.
What would Bobby say? What would Bobby do? If Bobby remained silent
the embassy man would say that Bobby didn't object to him taking
Bobby's
mutilated and destroyed passport back to the embassy with him. And
then
by extension the embassy man would claim or imply (with a straight
face)
that well, maybe Mr. Fischer didn't really mind that the U.S. had
grabbed and destroyed his passport because after all he knew that we
had
the legal right to do so! On the other hand if Bobby answered and said
that he does object he would break his silence and then the embassy
man
could say that Bobby had voluntarily met with him and that they had a
voluntary conversation and that Bobby didn't say this or he didn't say
that or he didn't assert his rights here or he didn't assert his
rights
there etc. Bobby answered and said, "Give me back my passport you son
of a *****!" At which the embassy man winced and replied that oh well
yes I'll leave it here with the security people with your belongings.
(he broke that promise about 5 minutes later when he left the Narita
airport immigration lockup with Bobby's passport! Jesus, usually it
takes even a Jew a little longer than that to break his word!) Bobby
asked the embassy man if he was a Jew. The embassy man said "Are
you?"
Bobby said "I asked you first!" The embassy man said that oh, no he
wasn't going to play that game, that he didn't have answer that
question. Bobby asked the embassy man his name. The embassy man said
his first name was "Peter." Bobby asked "Peter" "What's your last
name?" "Peter" told Bobby that "that doesn't concern you!" The
arrogance and criminality of the U.S. embassy people is almost
unbelievable. And at just about that point their conversation came to
an end and "Peter" left their meeting room. As Bobby was waiting in
the
meeting room with the door open for the guards to come and lead him
back
to his prison cell he saw "Peter" being so kind and effusive and
"respectful" with the Japanese immigration authorities as he shook
hands
with them one by one and bid them goodbye! A real gentleman, a real
gentleman!
By the way we should mention at some point and this is as good a time
as
any that after he was illegally arrested and imprisoned on July 13,
2004. Bobby never again saw his expensive European buffalo leather
U.S.
passport holder. Bobby bought it in Vienna Austria about 8 or 9 years
ago for a about $50 or $60 dollars and it's still in perfect
condition.
The Japanese immigration authorities swear that they don't have it so
that points to "Peter" and the U.S. embassy. Of course it's a very
"trivial" point but if Bobby stole some ones expensive leather
passport
holder he might go to prison for a while.
Perhaps now that the issue has been brought up "Peter" and the U.S.
embassy will hasten to return the stolen leather passport holder to
Bobby. But perhaps not! O.K.
Let's move on. Anyway, for a moment we forgot that it's completely
"legal" for the Jews to rob and plunder Bobby to their heart's
content.
Immediately after "Peter" left the immigration lock-up dept. the
immigration authorities gave Bobby on behalf of "Peter" a photocopy of
the aforementioned purported letter from the U.S. embassy in Manila to
"Bobby." But it's just a joke of course. This purported 2 pages
letter is from the embassy of the United States of America, Manila,
Philippines dated December 11, 2003 to Robert James Fischer signed by
Theodore Allegra consul of the United States of America. The
purported
letter has no other address! It seems when it comes to the Jews and
the
Jew-controlled U.S. government trying to "screw" Bobby anything goes!
This garbage people (the Jews) have no self-respect. Along with the
letter they gave Bobby the letter's supposed "enclosure" something
called "22 CFR Ch.1(4-1-97 Edition) Department of State" pages 252,
253,
254, 255, 256 and (presumably) 257. The absolute first time Bobby
ever
saw or heard of this supposed letter to him and it's supposed
enclosure
was July 14th 2004. Bobby never ever goes to the Philippine embassy
in
Manila. Bobby doesn't think he's ever been there in his life! But if
he ever did go there at anytime in his life it was surely many decades
ago!!! It's an absolute joke. As a matter of fact and just for the
record Bobby is not in the habit of visiting or calling U.S. embassy
anywhere in the world. Since Bobby left the U.S.A. in about July of
1992 (and he hasn't been back to the U.S.A. since then) the only
embassy
he has visited was the U.S. embassy in Bern, Switzerland. He visited
the Bern embassy on January 24, 1997 to purchase his U.S. Passport No.
Z7792702. He again visited the Bern embassy on or about October 27,
2003 and again on November 6, 2003 to get the aforementioned about 20
page passport insert. That is it. That is his sole contacts with
U.S.
embassy worldwide! The only other exception is a onetime visit in
about
1994 or 1995 to the U.S.A. library reading room in Budapest, Hungary.
Bobby made the visit with Mr. Pal Benko and at Mr. Benko's urging.
However Bobby found the atmosphere these to be so oppressive and scary
(guards, body check, bag check etc.) that he never went there again.
Bobby's attitude has been especially since he was indicted by the U.S.
government on trumped up political charges on December 15, 1992 that
the
less contact with U.S. government officials the better.
The last time Bobby was in the Philippines was around last summer.
Months before this alleged December 11, 2003 alleged letter was
written. Bobby hasn't been back to the Philippines since then. How
in
the world was Bobby ever to receive or even hear about this alleged
letter? Yet supposedly this sick joke of a "letter" is the heart of
the
Dept. of States case for "lifting" and then destroying Bobby's
passport!
The dirty Jews used very similar vicious illegal and criminal tactics
to
in about late 1998 or early 1999 rob and plunder all of Bobby's cash,
valuables and other belongings including his gold and silver coin
collections that he kept in storage at Bekins Moving and Storage
company(Pasadena, California branch). The robbery was committed by
Mr.
Bob Ellsworth, Bekins Moving and Storage company and the United States
government. In terms of monetary value the robbery was one of the
biggest if not the biggest robbery in the history of the United
States!!
But getting back to the matter at hand.
Page 254 of the 22 CFR Ch.1(4-1-97 Edition) Department of State
paragraph 51.75 reads: "Notification of denial or withdrawal of
passport." "Any person whose application for issuance of a passport
has
been denied, or who has otherwise been the subject of an adverse
action
taken on an individual basis with respect to his or her right to
receive
or use a passport shall be entitled to notification in writing of the
adverse action. The notification shall set forth the specific reasons
for the adverse action and the procedures for review available under
paragraphs 51.81 through 51.105." Then continuing to paragraph 51.81
"Time limits on hearing to review adverse action." "A person who has
been the subject of an adverse action with respect to his or her right
to receive or use a passport shall be entitled, upon request made
within
60 days after receipt of notice of such adverse action, to require the
Department or the appropriate Foreign Service post, as the case may
be,
to establish the basis for it's action in a proceeding before a
hearing
officer. If no such request is made within 60 days, the adverse
action
will be considered final and not subject to further administrative
review. If such request is made within 60 days, the adverse action
shall be automatically vacated unless such proceeding is initiated by
the Department or the appropriate Foreign Service post, as the case
may
be, within 60 days after request, or such longer period as is
requested
by the person adversely affected and agreed to by the hearing
officer."
Bobby was never properly notified in writing in the manner prescribed
by
the law that his passport had been revoked. Bobby doesn't have to
prove
that he was never properly notified in writing in the manner
prescribed
for by the law that his passport had been revoked. The U.S.
government
has to prove that Bobby was property notified in writing in the manner
prescribed for by the law that his passport had been revoked. That's
the way the system is supposed to work and everybody knows that.
That's
basic. Bobby challenges the U.S. government to prove that Bobby was
properly notified in writing in the manner prescribed for by the law
that his passport had been revoked. The U.S. government can't do it
because it's not true that Bobby was properly notified in writing in
the
manner prescribed for by the law that his passport had been revoked!
We
all know that the U.S. Government was a huge worldwide spy apparatus.
At last count the U.S. government has some 14 different spy
organizations. So we take this a step further.
We challenge the U.S. government to come up with any hard, genuine
evidence whatsoever that demonstrates that Bobby had ever seen or even
heard about or had any knowledge of any kind about this alleged letter
to him from the U.S. embassy in Manila, Philippines revoking his
passport dated December 11, 2003 and signed by Theodore Allegra Consul
of the United States of America before his forced meeting with "Peter"
of the U.S. embassy in Tokyo on July 14, 2004 in the Narita
International Airport immigration lockup!!! It simply can't be done.
Because Bobby didn't.
In Bobby's opinion there's a real possibility that this infamous
alleged
"letter" to Bobby dated December 11, 2003 from the U.S. embassy in
Manila, Philippines and signed by Theodore Allegra Consul of the
United
States of America was actually cooked up for prompt release in it's
precise final form by the CIA sometime on or after July 6, 2004 the
day
Bobby bought his Japan airlines round-trip ticket to the Philippines
and
made his reservation for flight JL 745 departing July 13, 2004 at
18:20
for Manila, Philippines! You say that can't happen? What world are
you
living in?
The letter was just meant to give the Japanese immigration authorities
a
cheap excuse a pretext a cover however false for cooperating with the
Tokyo U.S. embassy. Then the Japanese immigration authorities "acting
in good faith" and on "reliable information from the Tokyo U.S.
embassy
"Would have an excuse and pretext and a cover (though of course it
still
wouldn't be legal) for illegally canceling Bobby's entrance visa to
Japan of April 15, 2004 and illegally cancelling Bobby's exit visa
from
Japan of July 13, 2004 for illegally arresting Bobby and illegally and
brutally throwing him in the Narita international airport immigration
lockup (and nearly killing him in the process) for illegally turning
Bobby's passport over to the Tokyo U.S. embassy for its illegal
destruction by the Tokyo U.S. embassy and then for illegally forcing
Bobby to meet with "Peter" of the Tokyo U.S. embassy. The final step
for this charade, for this travesty of justice is if all goes
according
to plan is for the Japanese immigration authorities and the U.S.
embassy
in Tokyo to illegally deport Bobby to the U.S.A. where he will face a
kangaroo court on trumped up political charges. Then Bobby will be
convicted, imprisoned, tortured and murdered. Furthermore it is
Bobby's
conviction that the CIA has spread money around in the right places
and
in the right amounts to both the Japanese government and with the
Narita
international airport immigration authority to grease the wheels to
accomplish all of their dastardly plans for Bobby!
All right. As we've explained repeatedly Bobby's passport was never
revoked because it wasn't revoked in a legal manner. End of the
story.
But purely for the sake of arguments let's say that Bobby's passport
had
been revoked by the U.S. government and it had been revoked in a
completely legal and above board manner. Would that then give the
Japanese immigration authorities the right to confiscate Bobby's
passport and turn it over to the U.S. embassy in Tokyo and then for
the
U.S. embassy in Tokyo to physically destroy it??? Absolutely not.
Let's go back to 22 CFR Ch.1(4-1-97 Edition) paragraphs 51.76
"Surrender
of passport" "The bearer of a passport which is revoked shall
surrender
it to the Department or its authorized representative upon demand and
upon his or her refusal to do so such passport may be invalidated by
notifying the bearer in writing of the invalidation."
No strong ?arm tactics allowed by the Department. Unless the bearer
of
the passport voluntarily surrenders his or her passport to the
Department the department has no right to even touch the passport let
alone to physically mutilate or destroy it. That's the law. And you
had better believe that the Department and the Japanese immigration
authorities know it very well. Furthermore, if the Japanese
immigration
authorities truly believed that Bobby had entered and left Japan with
a
revoked passport and they considered that to be a crime then under no
circumstances could they mutilate or destroy the passport because the
passport would be the key evidence of the "crime." And by the same
token how could the Japanese immigration authorities turn over Bobby's
"evidential" passport to the Tokyo U.S. embassy for destruction and
mutilation? By doing so both the Japanese and the U.S. government
have
committed a serious crime.
Bobby is still appealing his arrest for allegedly illegally entering
Japan on April 15, 2004. But even if he wins the appeal so what? His
U.S. passport has already been destroyed by the Japanese and U.S.
government working in collusion! This amounts to pre-judgement of
Bobby's appeal. Finally both the Japanese and U.S. government by
illegally and in collusion destroying Bobby's passport have violated
in
a most brazen way Bobby's constitutional rights. Because the U.S.
constitution says that a person cannot be deprived of his property
without due process of a law!
Bobby has spent most of his time in Japan since January of 2000. He's
made a few good friends and acquaintances here. He's spent hundreds
of
thousands of dollars visiting Japanese "Onsen" (mineral bath). He's
spent over three hundred and fifty thousand dollars working with the
Seiko corporation trying to further develop his high-tech dream chess
clock. He's spent a small fortune on Japanese electronic products and
other Japanese products. But all this is outweighed by one lying
phone
call and one lying letter from the U.S. government. Irregardless of
how
this goes Bobby says "***** you" to the corrupt Japanese government and
Sayonara to Japan. Even if he lives and ever gets out of jail again
he
will never return to Japan again until every U.S. military base in
Japan
is closed and Japan is a free and independent country again.
I'm closing and in haste a few more words. Bobby swears that prior to
his being detained in the Narita airport by Japanese immigration
officials on about 5:30 p.m. on July 13, 2004. Bobby had never seen
or
heard a word or even a whisper from anyone at anytime anywhere to the
effect that his U.S. passport No. Z7792702 was "revoked" "invalid"
"expired" "cancelled" etc. Absolutely nothing ever, ever, ever. If
anyone says otherwise they are a LIAR. Furthermore, Bobby swears that
prior to his forced involuntary Narita immigration jailhouse meeting
with the Tokyo U.S. embassy man "Peter" on July 14, 2004. Bobby had
never seen or heard of and had no knowledge of any kind whatsoever at
anytime in his entire life of this alleged letter to Bobby dated
December 11, 2003 from the U.S. embassy in Manila, Philippines and
signed by Theodore Allegra Consul of the United States of America.
Bobby had no knowledge of it and never ever saw it or even heard about
prior to July 14, 2004. Never, ever, ever , ever, ever.
If anyone says otherwise they are simply a LIAR. Now, here's
something
to think about if anyone is really interested in truth of this matter.
Bobby arrived in Switzerland (from Japan) in about the middle of
October
2003. Bobby left Switzerland for Japan on December 16, 2003. During
all of this time Bobby never left Switzerland,
not even for a second. When Bobby visited the Bern, Switzerland U.S.
embassy he gave them in writing his swisscom mobile telephone sim card
number in Switzerland. The embassy called Bobby at that number
several
times. They had the number there's no question about that. Except
for
charging the phone's battery occasionally (and for whatever reason it
charges very quickly in Switzerland) that same sim phone number was on
and with a strong signal 24 hours a day! The infamous Allegra letter
to
"Bobby" (ha, ha, ha) was dated December 11, 2003. If the U.S. really
wanted to let Bobby know that his passport was "revoked" why not just
give Bobby a call on his swisscom sim card mobil phone and tell him
all
about it????? The U.S. is so full of ***** it's not even funny. No
wonder they're getting their asses kicked in Iraq and Afghanistan!
Japan beware you're backing a loser. Don't go down the drain with the
filthy Jew controlled U.S!
***END ARTICLE***
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.altermedia.info http://www.RealNews247.com
.



User: "Charles Farley"

Title: Re: Muslims Behead Dutch Filmmaker, Promise More Murders 13 Nov 2004 01:52:59 PM
Update:
Associated Press
November 12, 2004
Flames engulf mosque in Netherlands
THE HAGUE Netherlands -- Flames engulfed a mosque in southeastern
Netherlands early Saturday, the latest in a string of fires at Muslim
institutions since the killing of a Dutch filmmaker who was critical
of Islam.
A local broadcaster said the building, in the village of Helden near
the German border, was largely destroyed.
There was no immediate word on the cause.
There have been more than 20 incidents of fires or vandalism at Muslim
buildings - and a handful of retaliatory attacks on Christian churches
- since the Nov. 2 killing of filmmaker Theo van Gogh by a suspected
Muslim radical.
Van Gogh, a distant relative of the famous painter, was shot and
stabbed to death while cycling on an Amsterdam street. A note pinned
to his chest with a knife threatened Islamic holy war, or Jihad,
against non-Muslims.
Van Gogh had angered many Muslims with his movie "Submission," which
is highly critical of the treatment of women under Islam.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apeurope_story.asp?category=1103&slug=Netherlands%20Mosque%20Fire
Note: the word islam means "submission" -- hence the name
of Van Gogh's film.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Children now motivated by Islamic radicals to behead people. Liberals totally silent
Bush AWOL as Iraqis Behead Another American
U.S. Troops Behead VietCong Soldiers --- photo
Let's Behead The Queers
wake up islam : beheading = signs of pre-armageddon SURA 47 = behead ( they are only following allahs orders ) Rev 20v4 end times IT's REALITY folks
GOONS BEHEAD U.S. PRISONER
Senator and filmmaker take on Fox News! tvnl news
Filmmaker learns to worry about politics
Australian Filmmaker Tells How Israelis Persecute Palestinians
So-called filmmaker Michael Moore too fat!
Loose Change: Filmmaker uses Google Video to challenge official line on 9/11
9/11 Filmmaker on TVNL Radio, 12/20
Live Chat with No End In Sight Filmmaker Charles Ferguson
Re: JIHAD: LET KILL ALL DUTCH, AMERICAN AND BRITISH, Holland/UK is for Muslims only
Re: CHRISTIAN VALUES vs EVIL ARABIC MUSLIMS
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER