| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Charles Farley" |
| Date: |
24 Apr 2006 07:03:04 PM |
| Object: |
Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
Agence France-Presse
April 21, 2006
Malaysia demolishes century-old Hindu temple
KUALA LUMPUR -- Malaysian authorities have demolished a century-old
Hindu temple in Kuala Lumpur, bulldozing the building as devotees cried
and begged them to stop, Hindu groups said today.
The Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple was reduced to rubble after
Kuala Lumpur's city hall sent in bulldozers, they said.
In a complaint to police the temple's vice president, Subramaniam
Ragappan, said about 300 devotees were praying Tuesday when the
machines arrived, accompanied by police and city hall officials.
"We were forced to stop our prayers halfway as they proceeded to tear
down the temple," he said in a copy of the complaint obtained by AFP.
A copy of a letter from city hall to a local lawmaker, who had asked
for the temple to be left intact, said the demolition was going ahead
to make way for a building project. [A new mosque, perhaps? - CF]
"Everybody was crying and saying how could the government do this, but
they still destroyed the temple," Subramaniam told AFP. "For 100 years
we prayed there. How could they come to destroy the temple?" he said.
http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?gid=263&id=379485
See also:
Buddhas of Bamiyan statues, created in 630 A.D., destroyed by
muslims in March 2001:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan
.
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
24 Apr 2006 07:26:55 PM |
|
|
"In my initial post under this thread, I failed to mention the reseach
I am doing (for the last 18 months or so) at the Library of Congress,
which is the impact of Christianity on Chinese culture during the
16th,17th, and early 18th centuries-from a Chinese point of view. For
this purpose, I have read perhaps 200 books so far. Still, I find
posts in response to mine refreshing and perceptive; I thank you.
This post is added on the assumption that many readers may not be
aware of a Chinese emperor (Kang hsi)'s change of heart from tolerance
to the following, in 1721 (original in Chinese in the emperor's own
writing, translation is from Paul Rule's "Kung-tzu or Confucius?"
(1986), p 145; words in parentheses are added by me for clarification)
On reading this proclamation [from the pope, prohibiting Chinese
Christians from paying respects to Confucius], I can only conclude
that the Westerners are small minded. How can they talk about the
great ideas of China? No Westerners [who presented themselves on
behalf of the pope] understands Chinese books, and when they discuss
them, our people find many of their remarks ridiculous. Now I have
seen the Legation's proclamation, and it is just the same as Buddhist
and Taoist heresies and superstitutions. I have never seen such
nonsense as this. Henceforth no Westerner may propagate his
[missionaries at that time, all Catholics, were invariably male]
religion in China. It should be prohibited in order to avoid more
trouble.
From what I read, early Christianity in Europe sought tolerance when
it was in infancy, and switched to tactics to dominate once it had a
footing. Its followers tried to replicate this strategy in China, not
realizing that a footing, while firm in Europe with the conversion of
an emperor and such, may be infirm when that strategy is transplanted
to a culture with a longer and readily verifiable history, but of
which its followers have no knowledge, as suggested in the above
quotation."
David H Li
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
.
|
|
|
| User: "old hoodoo" |
|
| Title: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
24 Apr 2006 08:52:56 PM |
|
|
Topaz wrote:
"In my initial post under this thread, I failed to mention the reseach
I am doing (for the last 18 months or so) at the Library of Congress,
which is the impact of Christianity on Chinese culture during the
16th,17th, and early 18th centuries-from a Chinese point of view. For
this purpose, I have read perhaps 200 books so far. Still, I find
posts in response to mine refreshing and perceptive; I thank you.
This post is added on the assumption that many readers may not be
aware of a Chinese emperor (Kang hsi)'s change of heart from tolerance
to the following, in 1721 (original in Chinese in the emperor's own
writing, translation is from Paul Rule's "Kung-tzu or Confucius?"
(1986), p 145; words in parentheses are added by me for clarification)
On reading this proclamation [from the pope, prohibiting Chinese
Christians from paying respects to Confucius], I can only conclude
that the Westerners are small minded. How can they talk about the
great ideas of China? No Westerners [who presented themselves on
behalf of the pope] understands Chinese books, and when they discuss
them, our people find many of their remarks ridiculous. Now I have
seen the Legation's proclamation, and it is just the same as Buddhist
and Taoist heresies and superstitutions. I have never seen such
nonsense as this. Henceforth no Westerner may propagate his
[missionaries at that time, all Catholics, were invariably male]
religion in China. It should be prohibited in order to avoid more
trouble.
From what I read, early Christianity in Europe sought tolerance when
it was in infancy, and switched to tactics to dominate once it had a
footing. Its followers tried to replicate this strategy in China, not
realizing that a footing, while firm in Europe with the conversion of
an emperor and such, may be infirm when that strategy is transplanted
to a culture with a longer and readily verifiable history, but of
which its followers have no knowledge, as suggested in the above
quotation."
David H Li
The communists had one thing right....religion is a bad thing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
25 Apr 2006 09:35:29 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:52:56 -0500, old hoodoo
<alflags@cox-internet.com> wrote:
Topaz wrote:
"In my initial post under this thread, I failed to mention the reseach
I am doing (for the last 18 months or so) at the Library of Congress,
which is the impact of Christianity on Chinese culture during the
16th,17th, and early 18th centuries-from a Chinese point of view. For
this purpose, I have read perhaps 200 books so far. Still, I find
posts in response to mine refreshing and perceptive; I thank you.
This post is added on the assumption that many readers may not be
aware of a Chinese emperor (Kang hsi)'s change of heart from tolerance
to the following, in 1721 (original in Chinese in the emperor's own
writing, translation is from Paul Rule's "Kung-tzu or Confucius?"
(1986), p 145; words in parentheses are added by me for clarification)
On reading this proclamation [from the pope, prohibiting Chinese
Christians from paying respects to Confucius], I can only conclude
that the Westerners are small minded. How can they talk about the
great ideas of China? No Westerners [who presented themselves on
behalf of the pope] understands Chinese books, and when they discuss
them, our people find many of their remarks ridiculous. Now I have
seen the Legation's proclamation, and it is just the same as Buddhist
and Taoist heresies and superstitutions. I have never seen such
nonsense as this. Henceforth no Westerner may propagate his
[missionaries at that time, all Catholics, were invariably male]
religion in China. It should be prohibited in order to avoid more
trouble.
From what I read, early Christianity in Europe sought tolerance when
it was in infancy, and switched to tactics to dominate once it had a
footing. Its followers tried to replicate this strategy in China, not
realizing that a footing, while firm in Europe with the conversion of
an emperor and such, may be infirm when that strategy is transplanted
to a culture with a longer and readily verifiable history, but of
which its followers have no knowledge, as suggested in the above
quotation."
David H Li
The communists had one thing right....religion is a bad thing.
I don't agree with that. It's true that it's sometimes hard to stop
religions fighting each other. But on the other hand:
"It must be noted too that the attack on the dogmatic
principles underlying ecclesiastical teaching is increased steadily in
violence. And yet this human world of ours would be inconceivable
without the practical existence of a religious belief. The great
masses of a nation are not composed of philosophers. For the masses of
the people especially, faith is absolutely the only basis of a moral
outlook on life."
Mein Kampf
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles Farley" |
|
| Title: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
26 Apr 2006 09:37:16 PM |
|
|
What kind of lunatic cites Adolf Hitler?
I feel sorry for you "Topaz" -- you've been cheated
out of a normal life.
Hitler was a dweeb and a high school dropout, couldn't
get a date, and had no friends. He was a complete loser
before becoming a mass-murdering monster as well.
If you want to worship dweeb losers, why not at least
worship one who isn't dead:
http://www.imdb.com/gallery/granitz/4368/Events/4368/DJQualls_Ausse_7628697_400.jpg?path=pgallery&path_key=Qualls,%20DJ
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
27 Apr 2006 08:01:45 PM |
|
|
The Jews Are Our Misfortune
By Dr. William Pierce
If you've been listening to many of my broadcasts you will know that
the issue I talk about most often is that of media control. In nearly
every broadcast I have pointed out that the people who control the
mass media of news and entertainment are able to manipulate the
opinions and attitudes of about 95 per cent of the population. I have
pointed out
that the media bosses do this manipulation deliberately and in
collusion with one another, taking advantage of the compelling need
most people have to conform their ideas and their behavior to a
perceived norm.
The media bosses use their control over the mass media of
entertainment -- and to a lesser extent over the news media -- to
create an artificial norm that is presented to the public through
television, motion pictures, advertising, and other media, and this
artificial norm is the one perceived as real by most of the public.
Through their control of public opinion the media bosses also control
the democratic political process and governmental policy in a way that
is advantageous to them and disadvantageous to the White public. And
these media bosses are overwhelmingly Jews.
That has been the message I have presented over and over again in many
of these broadcasts. I have talked about different facets of Jewish
media control and have presented different specifics, different
details, in various broadcasts. I've discussed a number of different
Hollywood films or television shows as specific examples of the way in
which the Jews use their media control to brainwash the public, to
promote
fashions and styles and behavior that are harmful to our people but
that advance the long-term schemes of the Jews to further dominate and
exploit our society.
(Some of this may be outdated today, but it still explains why things
are the way they are)
I've talked about specific Jews who control various segments of the
mass media, and I've pointed out specific instances of the destructive
way in which they use their control. I've talked about the Jewish
media boss Sumner Redstone and his control of MTV and CBS and the
Hollywood film studio Paramount Pictures. I've talked about the Jewish
media boss Michael Eisner and his control of the Disney Company and
ABC. I've talked about the Jewish media boss Gerald Levin and his
control of Time Warner and CNN. I've talked about the Jewish media
boss Edgar Bronfman and his control of the largest segment of the
popular music industry and Universal Studios in Hollywood. And I've
talked about dozens of other Jewish media bosses and the media they
control and the specific ways in
which they use those media. In particular, during the past few months
I've talked about several recent Hollywood films which deliberately
target teenaged White girls and brainwash them with the notion that it
is fashionable for them to have sex with Black males.
And of course, I've talked about the Jewish control of the news media
as well as the entertainment media. In a way similar to their use of
the entertainment media to set popular fashions, the Jewish media
bosses distort and censor the news in order to give the public a
distorted picture of what is happening in the world. I've given
several very
specific examples of this Jewish management of the news in recent
months.
I've talked about the total blackout at the national level of the news
of the atrocious rape and massacre of Whites in Wichita, Kansas, by
Blacks last December, and I've talked about the almost total
suppression of the news of the Black racial attacks on Whites in
Seattle in the Mardi Gras riot at the end of February this year. I
also talked about
the downplaying of the racial aspects of the Black rioting in
Cincinnati in April of this year, about the failure of the news media
outside the immediate Cincinnati area to mention the deliberate
targeting of Whites, especially White women, by the Black rioters. And
I described the gross distortions in the news coverage of the racial
politics in York,
Pennsylvania, that led to the current White mayor of York being
charged in May with the killing of a Black during a Black race riot in
York 32 years ago.
I have pointed out repeatedly how all of this suppression of the news
and distortion of the news is aimed at creating and maintaining a
false picture in the public mind of racial conflict in the United
States. In this false picture Whites always are the aggressors, Blacks
or other non-Whites are the innocent victims, and the root of all
racial conflict
is White racism.
In a number of my broadcasts I've discussed at length why the Jews do
what they do: why they use their media control in such a deceptive and
destructive way, what their motives are. I've also talked about how
they collaborate. I've pointed out that their propaganda policies are
not formulated independently, but that they have a coherent party line
that
they all follow. I've given a number of specific examples of this.
Well, all of these things that I've talked about have not gone
unnoticed by the Jewish media bosses themselves. When people expose
their activities or their scheming they pay attention. In particular,
they have been paying attention to these American Dissident Voices
broadcasts and to the work of my organization, the National Alliance.
They read what's on our Web sites at natvan.com and natall.com and
resistance.com, and they talk about it among themselves. This shows up
pretty clearly in the uniform way in which their media respond to us.
Whether it's the Associated Press or Time magazine or the Washington
Post or a television news commentator anywhere in the United States,
they always use the same
phrasing in talking about us. They always use the word "hate" in
referring to us. They always say that the National Alliance is the
"most dangerous organized hate group" in America, despite the fact
that all we do is disseminate to the public the truth about what
they're doing. That's what they regard as "dangerous" and as "hate."
If you want to see a current indicator of the fact that they do think
about us, go to the Web site promoting Steven Spielberg's new
movie,A.I. There you'll see a parody of a part of the National
Alliance's Web site in the form of a page headed "Who Is the
Anti-Robot Militia?" It's obviously copied, almost word for word, from
the page "Who Is the National Alliance?" on our Web site. It's
difficult for me to understand what they hoped to accomplish with this
parody. Perhaps they believe that it will make people take us less
seriously.
Somewhat less quirky but much more directly deceptive are their
standard smokescreen responses. It used to be that whenever I would
raise the issue of Jewish monopoly control of the mass media of news
and entertainment during an interview or on a call-in program, I would
hear the response from a Jew or an apologist for the Jews: "What about
Ted
Turner? He's not a Jew," as if that negated everything I had said. Of
course, that response was used before Ted Turner's CNN was taken over
by the very Jewish Time Warner. And now that Ted Turner has been eased
out of all decision-making positions in the cable news network he
built and has been replaced by Jews, one doesn't hear the Ted Turner
response any longer.
The standard responses today, the ones I hear as often as I used to
hear the Ted Turner response, are the "it's the shareholders" and the
"it's the big bankers." Whenever I start naming names -- whenever I
begin talking about the control over the media wielded by Michael
Eisner or Sumner Redstone, for example, a Jew will pop up with the
response:
"Those guys don't control the media. It's the shareholders who control
the media. Eisner and Redstone are just employees. The shareholders
tell them what to do." A variation on this theme is, "Eisner and
Redstone don't own the media. It's the big banks that own all of the
media, and most of the big bankers are Gentiles."
Well, of course, that's not really true, and they know it's not true.
The big Jewish media bosses are mostly quite autonomous. Sumner
Redstone, for example, owns outright two-thirds of the shares in his
media empire. His personal fortune is more than 12 billion dollars,
according to Forbes magazine this month. I'm quite sure he doesn't
check
with any shareholders before he dreams up some new piece of
race-mixing filth for MTV.
As for Gentile bankers telling the Jewish media bosses what kind of
propaganda they must produce for the public, that's total nonsense. I
haven't yet done a study of the investment banking industry to
determine what percentage of Jews and what percentage of Gentiles are
involved in it, but one thing that's certain is that the Gentile
bankers would faint dead away at the thought of telling Jewish media
bosses such as Michael Eisner or the Sulzberger family or the
Newhouses or Sumner Redstone to cut back on the race-mixing
propaganda. Gentile bankers as a class are rich, deracinated capons,
whose only interest is money.
Every Jewish propaganda medium -- CBS or MTV or Time magazine or the
New York Times -- is staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and they
all know what they're doing. They work as a tribe, as a swarm of
termites gnawing at the foundations of our existence. There is total
agreement among the media Jews as to the general thrust of their
propaganda. They may disagree on many of the details -- they may even
compete against each other for a bigger slice of the media pie -- but
all agree on the general goals of degrading and subverting Gentile
civilization, of corrupting Gentile institutions, of mongrelizing our
race. Again, the Jews work as a tribe, and that is the source of their
strength and their success.
Gentile bankers, on the other hand, work only for themselves. They
would not dream of combining and using their financial strength to
protect our people from the Jews. They are terrified of the Jews, of
the media. The more money they have, the more selfish and the more
cowardly they are. The huge difference, the decisive difference,
between the Jews and our people is that they work as a tribe, and we
work as individuals. They
work together, rich Jews and poor Jews, for their common tribal
interests, against us, and until now we have failed to organize
effectively to defend ourselves against them.
Anyway, my point is that their defense against my exposure of their
activities and their power over our government is orchestrated - that
is, they've all gotten together and decided what their defense will be
-- and it's a deliberate lie. As I continue to expose the destructive
activities of the Jewish media bosses, you will continue to hear them
and their apologists respond that they really don't have any power,
that it's the Gentile shareholders and the Gentile bankers who control
the media. A lot of dimwits will believe that lie. A lot of couch
potatoes, a lot of soccer moms, a lot of baseball fans, a lot of
lemmings, will
believe that it's not the Jew Sumner Redstone who deliberately uses
MTV to corrupt White teenagers; instead it's some cabal of Gentile
shareholders and Gentile bankers who tell him what to do, and Redstone
is only an employee who follows their orders.
I think it's time for us to orchestrate our exposure of the Jewish
media. I think it's about time for the public, lemmings and all, to
begin hearing a uniform charge against them, a uniform statement of
our opposition to them. How about this: The Jews are our misfortune.
That's simple, and it's true, and it's easy to remember. Repeat after
me: The
Jews are our misfortune. Let's use that statement. Let's let everyone
hear it. Let's impress it on everyone's consciousness: The Jews are
our misfortune.
Of course, when I say the Jews are our misfortune, I'm not talking
only about the Jewish media bosses. I'm not talking only about the
Jews at the top, such as Sumner Redstone and the Sulzbergers and
Michael Eisner and the others who formulate and direct the propaganda
line against Gentile society; I'm talking about the whole tribe, and I
believe that message comes across in the statement, the Jews are our
misfortune. Let me tell you what the standard lemming response will be
to that statement, the response that they have been taught and will
parrot back.
First, from the religious lemmings it will be something like this:
"Oh, no, the Jews aren't our misfortune, we owe everything to the
Jews. Don't you know that Jesus was a Jew and God was his father? That
makes God a Jew. We must do what the Jews tell us. They are God's
people." I'm sure that argument is embarrassing to some of the more
sophisticated
apologists for the Jews, but many Christian Fundamentalists use it,
and I've heard it often.
From the secular lemmings it will be more like: "Don't you know that
Freud and Einstein and Salk were Jews? We wouldn't have a space
program if it weren't for Einstein. We wouldn't have a cure for polio
if it weren't for Salk. The Jews are our fortune, not our misfortune."
Well, of course, our space program has practically nothing to do with
Einstein or his Jewishness. Gentile thinkers envisioned it and
pioneered both its theoretical basis and its practical development.
The German theoretician, Hermann Oberth, and the Russian, Konstantin
Tsiolkovsky, were two of the Gentiles who independently demonstrated
mathematically the feasibility of space travel in the early years of
the last century. The American rocket pioneer Robert Goddard and the
German Wernher von Braun designed actual rockets and built the
vehicles which were the precursors of today's space ships. Jews didn't
become involved until it became glamorous and profitable. And the
development of a polio vaccine hardly would have missed a beat if
Jonas Salk had gone into the garment business instead of medicine. He
was one of a team, and he got the credit for the work of others as
well as for his own work.
The reasons we hear these silly and groundless claims in the first
place about how much we owe the Jews -- the reasons are Jewish media
control and Jewish tribalism, Jewish support for their own. Freud was
given the enormous buildup he received for his theorizing about anal
personalities and penis envy and the like because he was a Jew, not
because of any genuine merit in his theorizing. Other Jewish writers
recognized him as one of their own and propelled him to a position of
undeserved authority, and his theories ultimately did an enormous
amount of damage to the development of our understanding of psychology
and mental disease. Einstein was a competent mathematical physicist,
but a great deal of the publicity he received was based on the fact
that he was a Jew rather than on the merits of his work. As in the
case of Salk, Jewish publicists gave Einstein credit for the work of
others as well as for his own work.
What we must do is look at the balance sheet. Is the damage done to
our race by Karl Marx and all of his Jewish followers in the communist
movement -- the selective murder of more than 30 million of the best
of our people in Europe during the past century -- offset by whatever
contributions Einstein and Salk and other Jews have made -- even if
they did everything their Jewish boosters claim for them? Certainly,
there have been many other Jews who were competent and creative
engineers and scientists besides Einstein and Salk. Not every clever
Jew became a lawyer or a scriptwriter or a pawn shop owner or a
middleman. Some became chemists or mathematicians or physicists. But
can all of them together make up for the mass murders Lazar Kaganovich
perpetrated
aginst the Ukrainians, for the rapes and murders of German civilians
instigated by Ilya Ehrenburg, for the Eastern European girls still
being forced into sexual slavery on a huge scale today by Israeli
slave dealers?
I think not. And I have not yet put on the balance sheet what the
Jewish masters of America's mass media have done and are doing to us.
What can possibly compensate White Americans for the deliberate,
malevolent corruption of our young people by just one Jewish gangster
like Sumner Redstone and his MTV? The race-mixing, culture-destroying,
hip-hop filth churned out by Sumner Redstone's MTV seven days a week
is the single most destructive influence in American life today. And
of course, Redstone doesn't produce this filth all by himself. He has
thousands of Jews working for him at every level, not only in MTV but
also in CBS and in Paramount Pictures and in all of his other media
properties.
And although MTV, targeting White teenagers as it does, may seem the
most blatantly and maliciously destructive of the Jewish media, it is
hardly much worse than some of the filth being poured into the minds
of the American public by Michael Eisner's Disney empire: especially
by its Miramax films division under the Weinstein brothers. The fact
that much of the entertainment produced by Eisner's Disney Company is
relatively nnocuous does not compensate for the fact that some of it
is pure poison. The poison is being introduced gradually, more and
more each year, and it is having its effect. When the Disney Company
was entirely a Gentile company a few years ago, its output of
ntertainment may sometimes have been excessively bland, but none of it
was poison designed to corrupt White Americans.
And what can possibly compensate on our balance sheet for what the
Jewish news media are doing in their deliberate, calculated distortion
of the picture of the world seen by the American public. It is a
picture which has been designed to confuse White Americans, to
undermine their self-confidence, to induce feelings of racial guilt in
them. Just one example: the systematic suppression of the news of
Black crimes against White people and the exaggeration of the news of
every White crime against non-Whites is not a fluke. It is done
routinely by all of the Jewish news media: by the New York Times, by
the Washington Post, by Time magazine and Newsweek magazine, by CNN
and ABC News and CBS News and NBC News and all the rest. And
interracial crime is just one issue. The relations between the sexes;
immigration; the foreign relations of the United States with the rest
of the world, especially in the Middle East; and a hundred other
important issues are similarly distorted in their portrayal by the
media. This deliberate distortion of the public's view of the world
has done irreparable damage to the American system of government and
to American society. And again: the distortion has been deliberate,
planned, systematic, and intended to do harm to us. No number of funny
Jewish comedians, or successful Jewish entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley
or on Wall Street, or clever Jewish medical researchers can compensate
for this harm.
When we look at the balance sheet the conclusion is clear beyond any
doubt: the Jews are our misfortune. It's way past time for us to
accept this conclusion, to overcome our fears of being labeled
"anti-Semitic" for accepting this conclusion, to brush aside these
fears which have been instilled in us by the propaganda of the mass
media, and then to begin working to improve our fortunes.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "old hoodoo" |
|
| Title: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
24 Apr 2006 07:10:21 PM |
|
|
Charles Farley wrote:
Agence France-Presse
April 21, 2006
Malaysia demolishes century-old Hindu temple
KUALA LUMPUR -- Malaysian authorities have demolished a century-old
Hindu temple in Kuala Lumpur, bulldozing the building as devotees cried
and begged them to stop, Hindu groups said today.
The Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple was reduced to rubble after
Kuala Lumpur's city hall sent in bulldozers, they said.
In a complaint to police the temple's vice president, Subramaniam
Ragappan, said about 300 devotees were praying Tuesday when the
machines arrived, accompanied by police and city hall officials.
"We were forced to stop our prayers halfway as they proceeded to tear
down the temple," he said in a copy of the complaint obtained by AFP.
A copy of a letter from city hall to a local lawmaker, who had asked
for the temple to be left intact, said the demolition was going ahead
to make way for a building project. [A new mosque, perhaps? - CF]
"Everybody was crying and saying how could the government do this, but
they still destroyed the temple," Subramaniam told AFP. "For 100 years
we prayed there. How could they come to destroy the temple?" he said.
http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?gid=263&id=379485
See also:
Buddhas of Bamiyan statues, created in 630 A.D., destroyed by
muslims in March 2001:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan
Thank goodness the Hindus weren't displaying pictures of the prophet
Mohammed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
24 Apr 2006 08:40:53 PM |
|
|
old hoodoo wrote:
Charles Farley wrote:
Agence France-Presse
April 21, 2006
Malaysia demolishes century-old Hindu temple
KUALA LUMPUR -- Malaysian authorities have demolished a century-old
Hindu temple in Kuala Lumpur, bulldozing the building as devotees cried
and begged them to stop, Hindu groups said today.
The Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple was reduced to rubble after
Kuala Lumpur's city hall sent in bulldozers, they said.
In a complaint to police the temple's vice president, Subramaniam
Ragappan, said about 300 devotees were praying Tuesday when the
machines arrived, accompanied by police and city hall officials.
"We were forced to stop our prayers halfway as they proceeded to tear
down the temple," he said in a copy of the complaint obtained by AFP.
A copy of a letter from city hall to a local lawmaker, who had asked
for the temple to be left intact, said the demolition was going ahead
to make way for a building project. [A new mosque, perhaps? - CF]
"Everybody was crying and saying how could the government do this, but
they still destroyed the temple," Subramaniam told AFP. "For 100 years
we prayed there. How could they come to destroy the temple?" he said.
http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?gid=263&id=379485
See also:
Buddhas of Bamiyan statues, created in 630 A.D., destroyed by
muslims in March 2001:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan
Thank goodness the Hindus weren't displaying pictures of the prophet
Mohammed.
Don't forget the PBUH (Peace Be Upon Him) after you mention the name of
the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH)
;D
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
24 Apr 2006 11:07:54 PM |
|
|
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:4b5d3eFuqmkfU1@individual.net...
old hoodoo wrote:
Charles Farley wrote:
Agence France-Presse
April 21, 2006
Malaysia demolishes century-old Hindu temple
KUALA LUMPUR -- Malaysian authorities have demolished a century-old
Hindu temple in Kuala Lumpur, bulldozing the building as devotees cried
and begged them to stop, Hindu groups said today.
The Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple was reduced to rubble after
Kuala Lumpur's city hall sent in bulldozers, they said.
In a complaint to police the temple's vice president, Subramaniam
Ragappan, said about 300 devotees were praying Tuesday when the
machines arrived, accompanied by police and city hall officials.
"We were forced to stop our prayers halfway as they proceeded to tear
down the temple," he said in a copy of the complaint obtained by AFP.
A copy of a letter from city hall to a local lawmaker, who had asked
for the temple to be left intact, said the demolition was going ahead
to make way for a building project. [A new mosque, perhaps? - CF]
"Everybody was crying and saying how could the government do this, but
they still destroyed the temple," Subramaniam told AFP. "For 100 years
we prayed there. How could they come to destroy the temple?" he said.
http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?gid=263&id=379485
See also:
Buddhas of Bamiyan statues, created in 630 A.D., destroyed by
muslims in March 2001:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan
Thank goodness the Hindus weren't displaying pictures of the prophet
Mohammed.
Don't forget the PBUH (Peace Be Upon Him) after you mention the name of
the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH)
I thought that was ***** or Puke ore some equivalent.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "old hoodoo" |
|
| Title: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
24 Apr 2006 08:56:16 PM |
|
|
Defendario wrote:
old hoodoo wrote:
Charles Farley wrote:
Agence France-Presse
April 21, 2006
Malaysia demolishes century-old Hindu temple
KUALA LUMPUR -- Malaysian authorities have demolished a century-old
Hindu temple in Kuala Lumpur, bulldozing the building as devotees cried
and begged them to stop, Hindu groups said today.
The Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple was reduced to rubble after
Kuala Lumpur's city hall sent in bulldozers, they said.
In a complaint to police the temple's vice president, Subramaniam
Ragappan, said about 300 devotees were praying Tuesday when the
machines arrived, accompanied by police and city hall officials.
"We were forced to stop our prayers halfway as they proceeded to tear
down the temple," he said in a copy of the complaint obtained by AFP.
A copy of a letter from city hall to a local lawmaker, who had asked
for the temple to be left intact, said the demolition was going ahead
to make way for a building project. [A new mosque, perhaps? - CF]
"Everybody was crying and saying how could the government do this, but
they still destroyed the temple," Subramaniam told AFP. "For 100 years
we prayed there. How could they come to destroy the temple?" he said.
http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?gid=263&id=379485
See also:
Buddhas of Bamiyan statues, created in 630 A.D., destroyed by
muslims in March 2001:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan
Thank goodness the Hindus weren't displaying pictures of the prophet
Mohammed.
Don't forget the PBUH (Peace Be Upon Him) after you mention the name of
the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH)
;D
I thought about it but my fingers just refused to type it.... :-)
PBUH = "Place a bomb upon him."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Scotius" |
|
| Title: Re: Muslims Destroy Century-Old Hindu Temple |
28 Apr 2006 01:04:59 AM |
|
|
On 24 Apr 2006 17:03:04 -0700, "Charles Farley"
<CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote:
Agence France-Presse
April 21, 2006
Malaysia demolishes century-old Hindu temple
KUALA LUMPUR -- Malaysian authorities have demolished a century-old
Hindu temple in Kuala Lumpur, bulldozing the building as devotees cried
and begged them to stop, Hindu groups said today.
The Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple was reduced to rubble after
Kuala Lumpur's city hall sent in bulldozers, they said.
In a complaint to police the temple's vice president, Subramaniam
Ragappan, said about 300 devotees were praying Tuesday when the
machines arrived, accompanied by police and city hall officials.
"We were forced to stop our prayers halfway as they proceeded to tear
down the temple," he said in a copy of the complaint obtained by AFP.
A copy of a letter from city hall to a local lawmaker, who had asked
for the temple to be left intact, said the demolition was going ahead
to make way for a building project. [A new mosque, perhaps? - CF]
"Everybody was crying and saying how could the government do this, but
they still destroyed the temple," Subramaniam told AFP. "For 100 years
we prayed there. How could they come to destroy the temple?" he said.
http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?gid=263&id=379485
See also:
Buddhas of Bamiyan statues, created in 630 A.D., destroyed by
muslims in March 2001:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan
So ya' wanna invade Malaysia?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
