my favorite car sticker



 Politics > Politics-USA > my favorite car sticker

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 5

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Universal Soldier"
Date: 27 Feb 2005 02:24:09 AM
Object: my favorite car sticker
Annoy a liberal: work hard and be happy!
.

User: "Douglas Kerr"

Title: Re: my favorite car sticker 01 Mar 2005 05:53:21 AM
"Universal Soldier" <dood@wheres.my.car> wrote in message
news:29993134.nmQWHhePAU@cox.cox.net...

Annoy a liberal: work hard and be happy!

Working hard doesn't necessarily guarantee happiness.
.

User: "Dave Thompson"

Title: Re: my favorite car sticker 27 Feb 2005 11:45:56 PM
"Universal Soldier" <dood@wheres.my.car> wrote in message
news:29993134.nmQWHhePAU@cox.cox.net...

Annoy a liberal: work hard and be happy!

My reaction to that would be to have a sticker that says, "Annoy a
conservative: don't ask for their permission."
What I do have on my truck is.
A Jesus fish with legs, tools, and "Evolve" on it, been there for a while.
Gotten some angry stares.
One that says "My invisible friend thinks you have problems". No comments I
know of probably because conservatives don't really get it.
Another that says "liberal and proud". I had a guy give me some angry stares
over that one.
And also a recent one that says, "If you don't like my politics, I dare you
to tell it to my face."
Nothing yet on that one, but hoping some dumbass chest thumping conservative
is stupid enough to try doing it.
.
User: "Guy"

Title: Re: my favorite car sticker 28 Feb 2005 04:11:21 PM
"Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come> wrote in message
news:1125c0rs7ran573@corp.supernews.com...

"Universal Soldier" <dood@wheres.my.car> wrote in message
news:29993134.nmQWHhePAU@cox.cox.net...

Annoy a liberal: work hard and be happy!


My reaction to that would be to have a sticker that says, "Annoy a
conservative: don't ask for their permission."

What I do have on my truck is.

A Jesus fish with legs, tools, and "Evolve" on it, been there for a while.
Gotten some angry stares.

One that says "My invisible friend thinks you have problems". No comments
I know of probably because conservatives don't really get it.

Another that says "liberal and proud". I had a guy give me some angry
stares over that one.

And also a recent one that says, "If you don't like my politics, I dare
you to tell it to my face."

Nothing yet on that one, but hoping some dumbass chest thumping
conservative is stupid enough to try doing it.

One of my favorites which I saw on a pizza delivery car:
"I preferred it when it was the President getting screwed"
.

User: "Scott en Aztlán"

Title: Xtian Fish Badges 28 Feb 2005 09:37:18 AM
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:45:56 -0700, "Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come>
wrote:

What I do have on my truck is.

A Jesus fish with legs, tools, and "Evolve" on it, been there for a while.
Gotten some angry stares.

Have you seen the Xtian response? It's a bigger fish with the word
"TRUTH" on it eating the Darwin fish.
http://www.planeticthus.com/images/Products/AE-106-GS_detail.jpg
What would be a good "rebuttal" badge for this one?
--
Sloth Kills!
http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
.
User: "Paul"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 28 Feb 2005 07:19:56 PM
"Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:3fe6219sd52m8ie36q2g0innvk624qs3sf@4ax.com...


Have you seen the Xtian response? It's a bigger fish with the word
"TRUTH" on it eating the Darwin fish.

http://www.planeticthus.com/images/Products/AE-106-GS_detail.jpg

What would be a good "rebuttal" badge for this one?

The "Truth," fish on the right and the "Darwin," fish on the left. In
the middle is Calvin pissing on one and taking a dump on the other....
--
Democrats and Republicans: two bulls spewing the same *****.
.
User: "Dave Thompson"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 28 Feb 2005 07:48:44 PM
"Paul" <kretp@tmy.now> wrote in message
news:5pPUd.40354$u87.36068@bignews6.bellsouth.net...


"Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:3fe6219sd52m8ie36q2g0innvk624qs3sf@4ax.com...


Have you seen the Xtian response? It's a bigger fish with the word
"TRUTH" on it eating the Darwin fish.

http://www.planeticthus.com/images/Products/AE-106-GS_detail.jpg

What would be a good "rebuttal" badge for this one?


The "Truth," fish on the right and the "Darwin," fish on the left. In
the middle is Calvin pissing on one and taking a dump on the other....

Why would Calvin dump on evolution?


--
Democrats and Republicans: two bulls spewing the same *****.

Yeah, but you can take things too far. As an example, believing only
democrats support evolution or that evolution science can be dismissed as
creationism can.
.
User: "Paul"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 28 Feb 2005 08:53:20 PM
"Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come> wrote in message
news:1127ig4irpscs8b@corp.supernews.com...



"Paul" <kretp@tmy.now> wrote in message
news:5pPUd.40354$u87.36068@bignews6.bellsouth.net...

The "Truth," fish on the right and the "Darwin," fish on the left.

In

the middle is Calvin pissing on one and taking a dump on the

other....


Why would Calvin dump on evolution?

It really doesn't matter if he is pissing or dumping on the notion and
it doesn't matter which is on the right or the left (before you ask that
question). The combination of stickers/badges would be an expression of
annoyance with the rantings of people who prefer to live in the past
(both the creationists and the evolutionists) as opposed to dealing with
the legitimate problems of today and looking to the future. For the vast
majority of us, whether we were created or evolved has no effect on
whether or not we have to get up and go to work in the morning and we
are sick of hearing the arguement.

Democrats and Republicans: two bulls spewing the same *****.


Yeah, but you can take things too far. As an example, believing only
democrats support evolution or that evolution science can be dismissed

as

creationism can.

Again. Whether or not we were created or evolved means nothing to me.
The thing both theories have in common is they occurred in the past (and
the distant past at that) and IMO have nothing to do with the present.
Most of us have enough problems to deal without having to waste time on
trivial matters such as creationism vs. evolution and are sick of having
the whole argument shoved down our throats....
As for my opinions about the democrats and the republicans, my only
opinion on them is that they BOTH are nothing more than criminal
syndicates posing as legitimate organizations and neither one has the
interests of the People of the United States of America in mind...
.
User: "Dave Thompson"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 28 Feb 2005 09:23:22 PM
"Paul" <kretp@tmy.now> wrote in message
news:hJQUd.25482$hd6.12010@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


"Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come> wrote in message
news:1127ig4irpscs8b@corp.supernews.com...



"Paul" <kretp@tmy.now> wrote in message
news:5pPUd.40354$u87.36068@bignews6.bellsouth.net...


The "Truth," fish on the right and the "Darwin," fish on the left.

In

the middle is Calvin pissing on one and taking a dump on the

other....


Why would Calvin dump on evolution?


It really doesn't matter if he is pissing or dumping on the notion and
it doesn't matter which is on the right or the left (before you ask that
question). The combination of stickers/badges would be an expression of
annoyance with the rantings of people who prefer to live in the past
(both the creationists and the evolutionists) as opposed to dealing with
the legitimate problems of today and looking to the future.

What an idiot.
Science doesn't deal with legitimate problems?
Sheesh.
For the vast

majority of us, whether we were created or evolved has no effect on
whether or not we have to get up and go to work in the morning and we
are sick of hearing the arguement.

Well, the medicine and medical proceedures as well as the products and
methods that have been developed through science dependant on evolutionary
disciplines certainly do have an effect on you.


Democrats and Republicans: two bulls spewing the same *****.


Yeah, but you can take things too far. As an example, believing only
democrats support evolution or that evolution science can be dismissed

as

creationism can.


Again. Whether or not we were created or evolved means nothing to me.

Then you are incredibly short sighted.

The thing both theories have in common is they occurred in the past (and
the distant past at that) and IMO have nothing to do with the present.

You obviously know nothing about science. Thankfully your ignorance only
affects you at the moment.

Most of us have enough problems to deal without having to waste time on
trivial matters such as creationism vs. evolution and are sick of having
the whole argument shoved down our throats....

Man, I have never dealt with someone with his head so far in the sand.


As for my opinions about the democrats and the republicans, my only
opinion on them is that they BOTH are nothing more than criminal
syndicates posing as legitimate organizations and neither one has the
interests of the People of the United States of America in mind...

Well, that may be so. I'm an independant but I certainly don't discount the
importance of science and technology as you do for some unbelievable reason,
and I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a foot in
the door.
I suggest you get a better understanding of the world around and quit being
dismissive of things that you don't understand. Maybe you won't come off as
such a moron then.
.
User: "Usenet Sociopath"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 01 Mar 2005 09:38:40 AM
Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a foot in
the door.

Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.
.
User: "Fat, drunk, and Democrat is no way to go through life, son."

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 01 Mar 2005 09:44:41 AM
"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a foot in
the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.

<grin> I love watching the Libs make fools of themselves in their own
posts, with their pathetic command of the English language! I suspect Dave
really has no idea of the difference between "effect" and "affect".
.
User: "Mother of All Flockers"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 04 Mar 2005 02:37:32 PM
Fat, drunk Babs squeezed off this loaf:

[...]


<grin> I love watching the Libs make fools of themselves in their own
posts, with their pathetic command of the English language! I suspect Dave
really has no idea of the difference between "effect" and "affect".

Babs! Such the intellectual you are! Good for you!
You know the difference between effect and affect!
What a good girl! Before you know it, you'll finally
get out of the 9th grade (third try is the charm), and
you'll be able to go to vocational school and find a
job so you can move out of your mom's basement and
stop spending every waking moment posting spam and
gibberish on USENET.
Just to remind you, take a look at these:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/3638f08ddc4d2b7a
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/599907b86d0d4fe0
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/1534ed4e4fbbc3d2
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/dca705c345c7877b
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/aad421c49b41d8cc
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/6a8bc5392d824260
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/b82b0ff311818d3a
In short,
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics/search?q=Fraude+NNTP-posting-host&start=0&scoring=d&filter=0
SEVEN HUNDRED AND FORTY POSTS just to catalog your various sock puppets!
What an amazing douchebag!
HTH, ESaD,
-MF
.


User: "Dave Thompson"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 01 Mar 2005 01:11:36 PM
"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a foot in
the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.

Wow, another net nanny.
Yawn.
.
User: "Usenet Sociopath"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 01 Mar 2005 01:22:55 PM
Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a foot
in the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.


Wow, another net nanny.

Yawn.

That's the difference between you and I. I thank people for pointing out my
errors.
.
User: "Dave Thompson"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 01 Mar 2005 01:46:09 PM
"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1974959.gNiiEr3oqZ@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a foot
in the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.


Wow, another net nanny.

Yawn.


That's the difference between you and I. I thank people for pointing out
my
errors.

The difference between you and I is that I don't take the usenet as anything
particularly important and thus pointing out spelling errors is petty.
Get a life, son, and don't think you are doing anyone a favor by pointing
out spelling errors.
.
User: "Usenet Sociopath"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 01 Mar 2005 02:05:30 PM
Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1974959.gNiiEr3oqZ@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a foot
in the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.


Wow, another net nanny.

Yawn.


That's the difference between you and I. I thank people for pointing out
my
errors.


The difference between you and I is that I don't take the usenet as
anything particularly important and thus pointing out spelling errors is
petty.

"Spelling"? I don't think so. Lack of education is what you suffer from.
http://www.wonderfulwritingskillsunhandbook.com/html/affect_vs_effect.html

Get a life, son, and don't think you are doing anyone a favor by pointing
out spelling errors.

If your ego can't take it, it's your problem.
.
User: "Dave Thompson"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 01 Mar 2005 02:38:27 PM
"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1323445.V0ni0ZlyGs@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1974959.gNiiEr3oqZ@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a
foot
in the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.


Wow, another net nanny.

Yawn.


That's the difference between you and I. I thank people for pointing out
my
errors.


The difference between you and I is that I don't take the usenet as
anything particularly important and thus pointing out spelling errors is
petty.


"Spelling"? I don't think so. Lack of education is what you suffer from.
http://www.wonderfulwritingskillsunhandbook.com/html/affect_vs_effect.html

I bet you make spelling and punctuation errors all the time, but your spell
checker covers it up.
Getting all your words spelled correctly on a usenet post is about as
trivial as making a spelling error here. But if mastering your spellchecker
is all your substitute for content, then have a ball.



Get a life, son, and don't think you are doing anyone a favor by pointing
out spelling errors.


If your ego can't take it, it's your problem.

My ego can take it just fine. It's your ego that drives you to correct
people's spelling, and that's the problem.
.
User: "Usenet Sociopath"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 01 Mar 2005 07:25:14 PM
Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1323445.V0ni0ZlyGs@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1974959.gNiiEr3oqZ@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a
foot
in the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.


Wow, another net nanny.

Yawn.


That's the difference between you and I. I thank people for pointing
out my
errors.


The difference between you and I is that I don't take the usenet as
anything particularly important and thus pointing out spelling errors is
petty.


"Spelling"? I don't think so. Lack of education is what you suffer from.

http://www.wonderfulwritingskillsunhandbook.com/html/affect_vs_effect.html


I bet you make spelling and punctuation errors all the time, but your
spell checker covers it up.

Getting all your words spelled correctly on a usenet post is about as
trivial as making a spelling error here. But if mastering your
spellchecker is all your substitute for content, then have a ball.



Get a life, son, and don't think you are doing anyone a favor by
pointing out spelling errors.


If your ego can't take it, it's your problem.


My ego can take it just fine. It's your ego that drives you to correct
people's spelling, and that's the problem.

OK, you keep insisting it's a spelling error. Let's see:
1. "effect" should actually pass the spell checker
2. the rest of your post is spelled correctly, AFAICR
3. using "effect" instead of "affect" is a common error among certain
segments of the population
What's more likely:
1. You didn't know the difference between "effect" and "affect"
2. You just happened to type "e" (instead of any other 25 keys), while
demonstrating excellent marksmanship everywhere else (thanks to a spell
checker)?
.
User: "Dave Thompson"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 01 Mar 2005 09:06:50 PM
"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:2627580.nPAydpu2PT@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1323445.V0ni0ZlyGs@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1974959.gNiiEr3oqZ@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a
foot
in the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.


Wow, another net nanny.

Yawn.


That's the difference between you and I. I thank people for pointing
out my
errors.


The difference between you and I is that I don't take the usenet as
anything particularly important and thus pointing out spelling errors
is
petty.


"Spelling"? I don't think so. Lack of education is what you suffer from.

http://www.wonderfulwritingskillsunhandbook.com/html/affect_vs_effect.html


I bet you make spelling and punctuation errors all the time, but your
spell checker covers it up.

Getting all your words spelled correctly on a usenet post is about as
trivial as making a spelling error here. But if mastering your
spellchecker is all your substitute for content, then have a ball.



Get a life, son, and don't think you are doing anyone a favor by
pointing out spelling errors.


If your ego can't take it, it's your problem.


My ego can take it just fine. It's your ego that drives you to correct
people's spelling, and that's the problem.


OK, you keep insisting it's a spelling error. Let's see:

1. "effect" should actually pass the spell checker
2. the rest of your post is spelled correctly, AFAICR
3. using "effect" instead of "affect" is a common error among certain
segments of the population

What's more likely:

1. You didn't know the difference between "effect" and "affect"

2. You just happened to type "e" (instead of any other 25 keys), while
demonstrating excellent marksmanship everywhere else (thanks to a spell
checker)?

I'm curious why a spelling error is so important to you.
No, wait, I'm actually not.
But if you want to continue making an ***** out of yourself, I'll let you.
Your obsession over one word is much more an indicator of something wrong
than the error itself.
.
User: "BlackWater"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 02 Mar 2005 01:44:34 PM
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 20:06:50 -0700, "Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come>
wrote:

"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:2627580.nPAydpu2PT@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1323445.V0ni0ZlyGs@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1974959.gNiiEr3oqZ@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a
foot
in the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.


Wow, another net nanny.

Yawn.


That's the difference between you and I. I thank people for pointing
out my
errors.


The difference between you and I is that I don't take the usenet as
anything particularly important and thus pointing out spelling errors
is
petty.


"Spelling"? I don't think so. Lack of education is what you suffer from.

http://www.wonderfulwritingskillsunhandbook.com/html/affect_vs_effect.html


I bet you make spelling and punctuation errors all the time, but your
spell checker covers it up.

Getting all your words spelled correctly on a usenet post is about as
trivial as making a spelling error here. But if mastering your
spellchecker is all your substitute for content, then have a ball.



Get a life, son, and don't think you are doing anyone a favor by
pointing out spelling errors.


If your ego can't take it, it's your problem.


My ego can take it just fine. It's your ego that drives you to correct
people's spelling, and that's the problem.


OK, you keep insisting it's a spelling error. Let's see:

1. "effect" should actually pass the spell checker
2. the rest of your post is spelled correctly, AFAICR
3. using "effect" instead of "affect" is a common error among certain
segments of the population

What's more likely:

1. You didn't know the difference between "effect" and "affect"

2. You just happened to type "e" (instead of any other 25 keys), while
demonstrating excellent marksmanship everywhere else (thanks to a spell
checker)?


I'm curious why a spelling error is so important to you.

No, wait, I'm actually not.

But if you want to continue making an ***** out of yourself, I'll let you.

Your obsession over one word is much more an indicator of something wrong
than the error itself.

It's usenet tradition to obsess over microscopic
details - especially if you cannot rebut the actual
statements being made.
For the record :
http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/affect.html
"There are four distinct words here. When “affect” is accented on
the final syllable (a-FECT), it is a verb meaning “have an
influence on”: “The million-dollar donation from the industrialist
did not affect my vote against the Clean Air Act.” A much rarer
meaning is indicated when the word is accented on the first
syllable (AFF-ect), meaning “emotion.” In this case the word is
used mostly by psychiatrists and social scientists— people who
normally know how to spell it. The real problem arises when people
confuse the first spelling with the second: “effect.” This too can
be two different words. The more common one is a noun: “When I left
the stove on, the effect was that the house filled with smoke.”
When you affect a situation, you have an effect on it. The less
common is a verb meaning “to create“: “I’m trying to effect a
change in the way we purchase widgets.” No wonder people are
confused. Note especially that the proper expression is not “take
affect” but “take effect”—become effective. Hey, nobody ever said
English was logical: just memorize it and get on with your life."
In truth, I screw these two up every so often myself. No
biggie - context usually reveals what was ACTUALLY meant.
.
User: "Dave Thompson"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 02 Mar 2005 03:49:11 PM
"BlackWater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
news:422616db.28721739@news.east.earthlink.net...

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 20:06:50 -0700, "Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come>
wrote:

"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:2627580.nPAydpu2PT@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1323445.V0ni0ZlyGs@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1974959.gNiiEr3oqZ@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a
foot
in the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.


Wow, another net nanny.

Yawn.


That's the difference between you and I. I thank people for pointing
out my
errors.


The difference between you and I is that I don't take the usenet as
anything particularly important and thus pointing out spelling errors
is
petty.


"Spelling"? I don't think so. Lack of education is what you suffer
from.

http://www.wonderfulwritingskillsunhandbook.com/html/affect_vs_effect.html


I bet you make spelling and punctuation errors all the time, but your
spell checker covers it up.

Getting all your words spelled correctly on a usenet post is about as
trivial as making a spelling error here. But if mastering your
spellchecker is all your substitute for content, then have a ball.



Get a life, son, and don't think you are doing anyone a favor by
pointing out spelling errors.


If your ego can't take it, it's your problem.


My ego can take it just fine. It's your ego that drives you to correct
people's spelling, and that's the problem.


OK, you keep insisting it's a spelling error. Let's see:

1. "effect" should actually pass the spell checker
2. the rest of your post is spelled correctly, AFAICR
3. using "effect" instead of "affect" is a common error among certain
segments of the population

What's more likely:

1. You didn't know the difference between "effect" and "affect"

2. You just happened to type "e" (instead of any other 25 keys), while
demonstrating excellent marksmanship everywhere else (thanks to a spell
checker)?


I'm curious why a spelling error is so important to you.

No, wait, I'm actually not.

But if you want to continue making an ***** out of yourself, I'll let you.

Your obsession over one word is much more an indicator of something wrong
than the error itself.


It's usenet tradition to obsess over microscopic
details - especially if you cannot rebut the actual
statements being made.

For the record :

http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/affect.html

"There are four distinct words here. When “affect” is accented on
the final syllable (a-FECT), it is a verb meaning “have an
influence on”: “The million-dollar donation from the industrialist
did not affect my vote against the Clean Air Act.” A much rarer
meaning is indicated when the word is accented on the first
syllable (AFF-ect), meaning “emotion.” In this case the word is
used mostly by psychiatrists and social scientists— people who
normally know how to spell it. The real problem arises when people
confuse the first spelling with the second: “effect.” This too can
be two different words. The more common one is a noun: “When I left
the stove on, the effect was that the house filled with smoke.”
When you affect a situation, you have an effect on it. The less
common is a verb meaning “to create“: “I’m trying to effect a
change in the way we purchase widgets.” No wonder people are
confused. Note especially that the proper expression is not “take
affect” but “take effect”—become effective. Hey, nobody ever said
English was logical: just memorize it and get on with your life."

Spelling errors on the usenet are especially trivial since everyone has a
spellchecker. The only thing a mispelled word means is that someone didn't
use their spellchecker. For all we know netnannies mispell far more often
but just make sure they use their spellchecker.


In truth, I screw these two up every so often myself. No
biggie - context usually reveals what was ACTUALLY meant.

The one I screw up more is sit and set, the result of my dad being from the
south and using set for everything.
.
User: "Andrew Tompkins"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 03 Mar 2005 03:52:50 PM
"Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come> wrote in message
news:112cd71j3plfufd@corp.supernews.com...


"BlackWater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
news:422616db.28721739@news.east.earthlink.net...

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 20:06:50 -0700, "Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come>
wrote:

"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:2627580.nPAydpu2PT@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1323445.V0ni0ZlyGs@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1974959.gNiiEr3oqZ@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:


"Usenet Sociopath" <usenet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:1144120.JtZSMhbW7B@cox.cox.net...

Dave Thompson wrote:

I understand how theists and creationists can negatively effect
education and our technical and scientific standing if they get a
foot
in the door.


Sounds like they already effected (sic) yours.


Wow, another net nanny.

Yawn.


That's the difference between you and I. I thank people for pointing
out my
errors.


The difference between you and I is that I don't take the usenet as
anything particularly important and thus pointing out spelling errors
is
petty.


"Spelling"? I don't think so. Lack of education is what you suffer
from.

http://www.wonderfulwritingskillsunhandbook.com/html/affect_vs_effect.html


I bet you make spelling and punctuation errors all the time, but your
spell checker covers it up.

Getting all your words spelled correctly on a usenet post is about as
trivial as making a spelling error here. But if mastering your
spellchecker is all your substitute for content, then have a ball.



Get a life, son, and don't think you are doing anyone a favor by
pointing out spelling errors.


If your ego can't take it, it's your problem.


My ego can take it just fine. It's your ego that drives you to correct
people's spelling, and that's the problem.


OK, you keep insisting it's a spelling error. Let's see:

1. "effect" should actually pass the spell checker
2. the rest of your post is spelled correctly, AFAICR
3. using "effect" instead of "affect" is a common error among certain
segments of the population

What's more likely:

1. You didn't know the difference between "effect" and "affect"

2. You just happened to type "e" (instead of any other 25 keys), while
demonstrating excellent marksmanship everywhere else (thanks to a spell
checker)?


I'm curious why a spelling error is so important to you.

No, wait, I'm actually not.

But if you want to continue making an ***** out of yourself, I'll let you.

Your obsession over one word is much more an indicator of something wrong
than the error itself.


It's usenet tradition to obsess over microscopic
details - especially if you cannot rebut the actual
statements being made.

For the record :

http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/affect.html

"There are four distinct words here. When “affect” is accented on
the final syllable (a-FECT), it is a verb meaning “have an
influence on”: “The million-dollar donation from the industrialist
did not affect my vote against the Clean Air Act.” A much rarer
meaning is indicated when the word is accented on the first
syllable (AFF-ect), meaning “emotion.” In this case the word is
used mostly by psychiatrists and social scientists— people who
normally know how to spell it. The real problem arises when people
confuse the first spelling with the second: “effect.” This too can
be two different words. The more common one is a noun: “When I left
the stove on, the effect was that the house filled with smoke.”
When you affect a situation, you have an effect on it. The less
common is a verb meaning “to create“: “I’m trying to effect a
change in the way we purchase widgets.” No wonder people are
confused. Note especially that the proper expression is not “take
affect” but “take effect”—become effective. Hey, nobody ever said
English was logical: just memorize it and get on with your life."


Spelling errors on the usenet are especially trivial since everyone has a
spellchecker. The only thing a mispelled word means is that someone didn't
use their spellchecker. For all we know netnannies mispell far more often
but just make sure they use their spellchecker.


In truth, I screw these two up every so often myself. No
biggie - context usually reveals what was ACTUALLY meant.


The one I screw up more is sit and set, the result of my dad being from the
south and using set for everything.

Spellcheckers do have limitations such as misspelled words intentionally put in the
personal dictionary or a misspelled word that is itself a word (as in 'affect' and
'effect', or 'sit' and 'set').
--Andy
--------------------------------------------------
Andrew G. Tompkins
Software Engineer
Beaverton, OR
http://home.comcast.net/~andytom/Highways
--------------------------------------------------
.

User: "John David Galt"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 03 Mar 2005 04:59:41 PM
Dave Thompson wrote:

Spelling errors on the usenet are especially trivial since everyone has a
spellchecker. The only thing a mispelled word means is that someone didn't
use their spellchecker. For all we know netnannies mispell far more often
but just make sure they use their spellchecker.

In my experience, very few people need or use spell-checkers. You can
tell who they are because they commit a lot of the kinds of errors that
a spell-checker won't catch, such as using the wrong homonym.
.

User: "BlackWater"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 03 Mar 2005 10:29:47 AM
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:49:11 -0700, "Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come>
wrote:


"BlackWater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message


"There are four distinct words here. When “affect” is accented on
the final syllable (a-FECT), it is a verb meaning “have an
influence on”: “The million-dollar donation from the industrialist
did not affect my vote against the Clean Air Act.” A much rarer
meaning is indicated when the word is accented on the first
syllable (AFF-ect), meaning “emotion.” In this case the word is
used mostly by psychiatrists and social scientists— people who
normally know how to spell it. The real problem arises when people
confuse the first spelling with the second: “effect.” This too can
be two different words. The more common one is a noun: “When I left
the stove on, the effect was that the house filled with smoke.”
When you affect a situation, you have an effect on it. The less
common is a verb meaning “to create“: “I’m trying to effect a
change in the way we purchase widgets.” No wonder people are
confused. Note especially that the proper expression is not “take
affect” but “take effect”—become effective. Hey, nobody ever said
English was logical: just memorize it and get on with your life."


Spelling errors on the usenet are especially trivial since everyone has a
spellchecker.

I never use one. Of course I got through grade school just
before the lefties totally ruined things. Now my younger
brother, when he graduated, could barely read or write.
A difference of three years. They simply taught me to read,
write and spell by drill - do it again, do it faster, do
it better. By the time my brother got into the same grades
they'd switched over to a more 'theory oriented' approach
which totally confused the kids at the time they least
needed being confused.

The only thing a mispelled word means is that someone didn't
use their spellchecker. For all we know netnannies mispell far more often
but just make sure they use their spellchecker.

There are a few words I cannot remember - is it "their"
or "thier" for example ? The rule says the latter, but
the former *looks* better somehow. So, you'll commonly
see both in my posts.
Now as for GRAMMAR ... is there such a thing as a GOOD
grammar-checker ? So much of language is context-dependent
that it would be hell for a dumb machine to do anything
but make a few lame suggestions.

In truth, I screw these two up every so often myself. No
biggie - context usually reveals what was ACTUALLY meant.


The one I screw up more is sit and set, the result of my dad
being from the south and using set for everything.

Heh ... I had a yankee dad and southern mom ... so the
local dialects sort of cancelled each other out. (or
should that have been "cancelled-out each other" ?) :-)
.
User: "The Real Bev"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 04 Mar 2005 12:07:01 AM
BlackWater wrote:


On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:49:11 -0700, "Dave Thompson" <itsme@dk.come>
wrote:


"BlackWater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message


"There are four distinct words here. When ?affect? is accented on
the final syllable (a-FECT), it is a verb meaning ?have an
influence on?: ?The million-dollar donation from the industrialist
did not affect my vote against the Clean Air Act.? A much rarer
meaning is indicated when the word is accented on the first
syllable (AFF-ect), meaning ?emotion.? In this case the word is
used mostly by psychiatrists and social scientists- people who
normally know how to spell it. The real problem arises when people
confuse the first spelling with the second: ?effect.? This too can
be two different words. The more common one is a noun: ?When I left
the stove on, the effect was that the house filled with smoke.?
When you affect a situation, you have an effect on it. The less
common is a verb meaning ?to create?: ?I?m trying to effect a
change in the way we purchase widgets.? No wonder people are
confused. Note especially that the proper expression is not ?take
affect? but ?take effect?-become effective. Hey, nobody ever said
English was logical: just memorize it and get on with your life."


Spelling errors on the usenet are especially trivial since everyone has a
spellchecker.


I never use one. Of course I got through grade school just
before the lefties totally ruined things. Now my younger
brother, when he graduated, could barely read or write.
A difference of three years. They simply taught me to read,
write and spell by drill - do it again, do it faster, do
it better. By the time my brother got into the same grades
they'd switched over to a more 'theory oriented' approach
which totally confused the kids at the time they least
needed being confused.

I think it helps to do a lot of reading. I honestly don't remember
memorizing spelling words or doing grammar exercises to learn the proper
forms, I just parroted back stuff that I'd picked up subliminally. Same
with foreign languages. Unfortunately, that seems to be one of the
things that disappears as you grow old^H^H^Hup.

The only thing a mispelled word means is that someone didn't
use their spellchecker. For all we know netnannies mispell far more often
but just make sure they use their spellchecker.

A spellchxr won't find "loose" (instead of "lose") to be an error, even
though it's one of the most common. You can use them, but you can't
trust them.

There are a few words I cannot remember - is it "their"
or "thier" for example ? The rule says the latter, but
the former *looks* better somehow. So, you'll commonly
see both in my posts.

Think of "their" as "the iridium". You will never misspell it again.
Find handy mnemonics for other troublesome words -- sometimes just
pronouncing them funny is good enough.

Now as for GRAMMAR ... is there such a thing as a GOOD
grammar-checker ? So much of language is context-dependent
that it would be hell for a dumb machine to do anything
but make a few lame suggestions.

If there were such a thing, foreigners would all write perfect English.
Long ago I found a nifty little booklet at an educational supply store
that explained a lot of grammar rules in a reasonably understandable way
-- maybe you'll get lucky. It also helps to study a foreign language --
learning how other languages work illuminates the operation of your own.
--
Cheers, Bev
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
"They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again
incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
.
User: "Scott en Aztlán"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 04 Mar 2005 08:30:12 AM
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:07:01 -0800, The Real Bev
<bashley@myrealbox.com> wrote:

I think it helps to do a lot of reading. I honestly don't remember
memorizing spelling words or doing grammar exercises to learn the proper
forms, I just parroted back stuff that I'd picked up subliminally.

I did both. In 6th grade, the entire Language Arts class period was
spent doing drills and exercises. I moved to a different school (same
school district) for7th grade; I had learned so much in that 6th grade
class that I already knew everything they were teaching, and was
allowed to "work ahead" and do the 8th grade stuff.
It must have hit me at precisely the right time during my formative
process, as my grammar and spelling have been impeccable ever since -
and I never use a spell checker on USENET. ;)

Think of "their" as "the iridium". You will never misspell it again.

I never needed such mnemonic aids - although, thanks to one of the
Charlie Brown movies, I will always remember "I before E except after
C." :)
--
Sloth Kills!
http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
.
User: "Arif Khokar"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 04 Mar 2005 01:25:41 PM
Scott en Aztlán wrote:

It must have hit me at precisely the right time during my formative
process, as my grammar and spelling have been impeccable ever since -
and I never use a spell checker on USENET. ;)

I know I have problems spelling some words. Usually, I try to verify a
word's spelling on dictionary.com (mainly so that I remember how to
spell it the next time I decide to use it).
.
User: "Scott en Aztlán"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 04 Mar 2005 07:59:17 PM
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:25:41 GMT, Arif Khokar <akhokar1234@wvu.edu>
wrote:

I know I have problems spelling some words. Usually, I try to verify a
word's spelling on dictionary.com (mainly so that I remember how to
spell it the next time I decide to use it).

That's fine - at least you have the ability to detect when a word
doesn't look quite right, allowing you to double-check. Most of the
people who use spelling checkers need them because they would
otherwise never notice their misteaks.
[Closed Captioning for the Humor Impaired: That misspelling was
intentional.]
--
Sloth Kills!
http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 04 Mar 2005 08:27:57 PM
Scott en Aztl=E1n wrote:

On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:25:41 GMT, Arif Khokar <akhokar1234@wvu.edu>
wrote:

I know I have problems spelling some words. Usually, I try to

verify a

word's spelling on dictionary.com (mainly so that I remember how to
spell it the next time I decide to use it).


That's fine - at least you have the ability to detect when a word
doesn't look quite right, allowing you to double-check. Most of the
people who use spelling checkers need them because they would
otherwise never notice their misteaks.

[Closed Captioning for the Humor Impaired: That misspelling was
intentional.]

I inadvertently kept hitting "Change" on my spell checker one time
while proofing one of my stories for the newspaper; I didn't notice as
I kept changing any errors that it had highlighted a fellow I was
quoting whose last name was "Schley." It didn't recognize "Schley," of
course, and I accidently change it to "Schlep." Good thing he had a
sense of humor.
One change I caught before it got published was about the civil
engineering firm Morrison-Knudsen, which was doing a big highway
project here in Denver (to stay on topic). Spell-check didn't recognize
"Morrison" and suggested changing it to "Moron." I am so glad I caught
that one.
.




User: "BlackWater"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 05 Mar 2005 01:00:24 AM
The Real Bev <bashley@myrealbox.com> wrote:

BlackWater wrote:




There are a few words I cannot remember - is it "their"
or "thier" for example ? The rule says the latter, but
the former *looks* better somehow. So, you'll commonly
see both in my posts.


Think of "their" as "the iridium". You will never misspell it again.

So it's " 'I' before 'E' except after 'C' ... except for 'their' "?
No wonder English is so difficult for non-speakers ...

Find handy mnemonics for other troublesome words -- sometimes just
pronouncing them funny is good enough.

Now as for GRAMMAR ... is there such a thing as a GOOD
grammar-checker ? So much of language is context-dependent
that it would be hell for a dumb machine to do anything
but make a few lame suggestions.


If there were such a thing, foreigners would all write perfect English.
Long ago I found a nifty little booklet at an educational supply store
that explained a lot of grammar rules in a reasonably understandable way
-- maybe you'll get lucky. It also helps to study a foreign language --
learning how other languages work illuminates the operation of your own.

The WORDPERFECT suite contains "Grammatik" ... but it's not
particularly smart. SO much is contextual that unless a
computer can really UNDERSTAND what you're trying for it
won't be able to give you the proper grammar.
.
User: "The Real Bev"

Title: Re: Xtian Fish Badges 05 Mar 2005 11:56:57 PM
BlackWater wrote:


The Real Bev <bashley@myrealbox.com> wrote:

BlackWater wrote:

There are a few words I cannot remember - is it "their"
or "thier" for example ? The rule says the latter, but
the former *looks* better somehow. So, you'll commonly
see both in my posts.


Think of "their" as "the iridium". You will never misspell it again.


So it's " 'I' before 'E' except after 'C' ... except for 'their' "?

"...or when followed by G as in 'neighbor' and 'weigh.' Still doesn't
cover 'their,' of course, which comes from Old Norse via Middle English
("Whan that aprille with its shoures soote..." which is pronounced sort
of like modern German).

No wonder English is so difficult for non-speakers ...

One problem is that English has stolen words and grammar from a number
of other languages, each with its own set of rules. If we'd just
followed Shaxpere's lead we wouldn't have these problems and
proofreaders would have to find gainful employment.

--
Cheers,
Bev
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I've enjoyed just about as much of this as I can stand.
.





















  Page 1 of 5

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER