"John Ladasky" <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1159380147.848348.127430@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

dapra wrote:

The President should announce;

* We have no intention to force on Iraq a neo liberal economy.
Thereby we encourage you, the Iraqi people to rescind Bremmers, the
proconsul during the occupation, illegal orders (flat tax, 100%
repatriation of profit by foreigners, etc.). Furthermore, we stop
building a 'Vatican' size embassy.

* We do not want permanent military bases in Iraq. Thereby, we stop
building them.

* We do not want to 'steal' your oil. Thereby, we pull out our personal
from your oil ministry. You are free to sell your oil to the ones who
gives you the best deal.

All of that would take care of the justified suspicion of the Iraqis,
and diminish resistance to the occupation.

* We have the intention to leave Iraq as soon as possible. If you
restore security, we'll leave. And we grant you $20 billions for
rebuilding your country, with no strings attached, except ONE. Arrest or
expel all Al Qaeda or affiliated organizations and persons.

Of course my ideas are not World Domination or Perpetual War, Bush would
like to have, but it could result in a peaceful end of this misguided
advanture, the Iraq War.

That seems like a reasonable program to me. I don't know that $20
billion would be enough for reconstruction, though. There probably has
to be security funding, before the reconstruction money can be spent.
Until Iraq can stop the oil pipeline attacks, there's little hope of
them reconstructing the way that Rumsfeld and Cheney promised us they
would.

I know that the United States is building very permanent-looking
military installations in Iraq. And anyone who has seen Fahrenheit
9/11 has seen the video footage of the Iraq-for-sale economic
conference, hosted by American businesses. The one thing you mentioned
that I don't recall hearing before is that the United States has its
own people in positions of responsibility at Iraq's oil ministry. Do
you have a citation for this statement? Thanks.

At this point the only security Iraq can have as a single country is a
central government more brutal than Saddam, more brutal than BushCo's
occupation, more brutal than could allow democracy.

Since BushCo has the Shias, Sunnis, and Kurds at one another's throat the
most likely shape of peace would be three autonomous countries.

"John Ladasky" <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1159380147.848348.127430@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

dapra wrote:

The President should announce;

* We have no intention to force on Iraq a neo liberal economy.
Thereby we encourage you, the Iraqi people to rescind Bremmers, the
proconsul during the occupation, illegal orders (flat tax, 100%
repatriation of profit by foreigners, etc.). Furthermore, we stop
building a 'Vatican' size embassy.

* We do not want permanent military bases in Iraq. Thereby, we stop
building them.

* We do not want to 'steal' your oil. Thereby, we pull out our personal
from your oil ministry. You are free to sell your oil to the ones who
gives you the best deal.

All of that would take care of the justified suspicion of the Iraqis,
and diminish resistance to the occupation.

* We have the intention to leave Iraq as soon as possible. If you
restore security, we'll leave. And we grant you $20 billions for
rebuilding your country, with no strings attached, except ONE. Arrest or
expel all Al Qaeda or affiliated organizations and persons.

Of course my ideas are not World Domination or Perpetual War, Bush would
like to have, but it could result in a peaceful end of this misguided
advanture, the Iraq War.

That seems like a reasonable program to me. I don't know that $20
billion would be enough for reconstruction, though. There probably has
to be security funding, before the reconstruction money can be spent.
Until Iraq can stop the oil pipeline attacks, there's little hope of
them reconstructing the way that Rumsfeld and Cheney promised us they
would.

I know that the United States is building very permanent-looking
military installations in Iraq. And anyone who has seen Fahrenheit
9/11 has seen the video footage of the Iraq-for-sale economic
conference, hosted by American businesses. The one thing you mentioned
that I don't recall hearing before is that the United States has its
own people in positions of responsibility at Iraq's oil ministry. Do
you have a citation for this statement? Thanks.

At this point the only security Iraq can have as a single country is a
central government more brutal than Saddam, more brutal than BushCo's
occupation, more brutal than could allow democracy.

Since BushCo has the Shias, Sunnis, and Kurds at one another's throat the
most likely shape of peace would be three autonomous countries.

John Ladasky wrote:

dapra wrote:

The President should announce;

* We have no intention to force on Iraq a neo liberal economy.
Thereby we encourage you, the Iraqi people to rescind Bremmers, the
proconsul during the occupation, illegal orders (flat tax, 100%
repatriation of profit by foreigners, etc.). Furthermore, we stop
building a 'Vatican' size embassy.

* We do not want permanent military bases in Iraq. Thereby, we stop
building them.

* We do not want to 'steal' your oil. Thereby, we pull out our personal
from your oil ministry. You are free to sell your oil to the ones who
gives you the best deal.

All of that would take care of the justified suspicion of the Iraqis,
and diminish resistance to the occupation.

* We have the intention to leave Iraq as soon as possible. If you
restore security, we'll leave. And we grant you $20 billions for
rebuilding your country, with no strings attached, except ONE. Arrest
or
expel all Al Qaeda or affiliated organizations and persons.

Of course my ideas are not World Domination or Perpetual War, Bush
would
like to have, but it could result in a peaceful end of this
misguided
advanture, the Iraq War.

That seems like a reasonable program to me. I don't know that $20
billion would be enough for reconstruction, though. There probably has
to be security funding, before the reconstruction money can be spent.
Until Iraq can stop the oil pipeline attacks, there's little hope of
them reconstructing the way that Rumsfeld and Cheney promised us they
would.

I know that the United States is building very permanent-looking
military installations in Iraq. And anyone who has seen Fahrenheit
9/11 has seen the video footage of the Iraq-for-sale economic
conference, hosted by American businesses. The one thing you mentioned
that I don't recall hearing before is that the United States has its
own people in positions of responsibility at Iraq's oil ministry. Do
you have a citation for this statement? Thanks.


+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Ladasky Home Solar, Inc.: blowing sunshine up your |
| power grid since March 24, 2005. Fiat lux! |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Uptime Downtime kWh generated kWh consumed |
| 549 days 6.5 hours 10445 10343 |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+

Have you heard that Brown and Root have the concession for American
mess halls in Iraq? To the point where they have gotten the Iraqi
government to discourage and even prohibit the establishment of fast
food restaurants that might compete with their body count for contract
payments.