"Joe Blowtowski" <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0138j05802omqomp02pme470ov0sb4hcss@4ax.com...

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:24:51 -0600, "owl_1971@hotmail.com"
<owl_1971_spammers_tongues_are_toilet_paper@hotmail.com> wrote:

OK Prove it..

Don't change the subject by suggesting I need to dig up what was stated on
national television.

Is this site /credible/ enough for you?

site:georgewbush.com kerry

The ball is in your court.


--
Warm Regards,

Raven Cecil

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:27:35 -0700, Joe Blowtowski
<Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:24:51 -0600, "owl_1971@hotmail.com"
<owl_1971_spammers_tongues_are_toilet_paper@hotmail.com> wrote:

OK Prove it..

try using Google to SEARCH the Whitehouse's Website for KERRY
< http://www.google.com/search?as_q=site:www.whitehouse.gov+KERRY

use CHENEY REAL WORDS IN FULL CONTEXT

week insisting that America must be more "sensitive" to allies and
American citizens' concerns in the "war on terror." Cheney's retort:
"America has been in too many wars for any of our wishes, but not a
one of them was won by being sensitive." He went on: "A 'sensitive
war' will not destroy the evil men who killed 3,000 Americans and who
seek the chemical, nuclear and biological weapons to kill hundreds of
thousands more." Cheney's attack could have been leveled at himself
and others in the Bush administration, both of whom have frequently
used the "s" word. See these other examples of how Cheney's cheap
political attack contradicts his own stated positions on military
affairs and social issues.

PRESIDENT BUSH STRESSES NEED TO BE "SENSITIVE" IN MILTARY AFFAIRS: On
3/4/01, President Bush stressed the need to be "sensitive" in
conducting military affairs, stating, "because America is powerful, we
must be sensitive about expressing our power and influence." And just
last week, President Bush said, "In terms of the balance between
running down intelligence and bringing people to justice obviously is
-- we need to be very sensitive on that."

SPECIAL FORCES STATE NEED TO FIGHT "SENSITIVE WAR ON TERRORISM": The
Bush campaign's latest salvo, while aimed at Kerry, also is an attack
on the military's top special forces commanders. On 7/20/04, the Bush
administration sent one of the Air Force's top special forces officers
to Capitol Hill to assuage concerns about tactics being used in the
War on Terror. In his testimony, Chief Master Sgt. Robert Martens
reassured Republican Chairman Rep. Jim Saxton (R-NJ) that "our special
operators offer a seasoned, culturally sensitive war on terrorism."

VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SAYS MILITARY MUST NOT BE INSENSITIVE: On
4/13/04, Cheney said the Bush administration was focused on conducting
sensitive military operations. He stated, "We recognize that the
presence of U.S. forces can in some cases present a burden on the
local community. We're not insensitive to that. We work almost on a
continual basis with the local officials to remove points of friction
and reduce the extent to which problems arise in terms of those
relationships."

RUMSFELD STRESSES NEED TO BE "SENSITIVE" IN THE WAR: In the lead up to
the Iraq war and afterwards, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
promised the Pentagon would be "sensitive." On 2/5/03, he said "we
have to be sensitive, to the extent the world thinks the United States
is focused on the problems in Iraq, it's conceivable that someone
could make a mistake and believe that that's an opportunity for them
to take an action which they otherwise would have avoided." On 7/9/03,
he reassured the public that his department was being "sensitive" to
troop needs during the war. He said U.S. commanders are "sensitive to
the importance of troops knowing what the rotation plan will be so
they have some degree of certainty in their lives. And [they] are
sensitive to the importance of the quality of their lives."

GEN. RICHARD MYERS SAYS MILITARY NEEDS TO BE "SENSITIVE" IN WAR: On
10/31/01, Gen. Richard Myers, Bush's chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, was asked about whether the military would be "sensitive" to
religious issues in prosecuting the War on Terror. He said "We are, I
think, very culturally sensitive." On 1/7/03, Myers touted the Army's
ability to be "sensitive." He said "we can ask of our troops to go out
there and be, on the one hand, very sensitive to cultural issues, on
the other hand, be ready to respond in self-defense to a very ticklish
situation, all at the same time." On 11/19/03, Myers said U.S. troops
"are very sensitive to the balance between appropriate military action
and not trying to turn the average Iraqi against the coalition."

GEN. TOMMY FRANKS SAID THE WHITE HOUSE MADE SURE TO BE "SENSITIVE": On
7/10/03, Gen. Tommy Franks went to Capitol Hill to answer questions
about the War on Terror. He said the Bush administration explicitly
understood the "sensitive" need for the U.S. to continue pursuing al
Qaeda in Afghanistan, instead of appearing like it was solely focused
on Iraq. Franks said, "Everyone from the president to Secretary
Rumsfeld right through me were very sensitive, to be sure, that our
operations moved ahead in Afghanistan in parallel with what we were
doing in Iraq."

ASHCROFT CLAIMS THE ADMINISTRATION IS BEING "SENSITIVE" IN WAR ON
TERROR: Attorney General John Ashcroft has repeatedly stressed the
need for the Bush administration to be "sensitive" in fighting the War
on Terror. On 4/28/03, just a month after the U.S. invasion of Iraq,
Ashcroft said, "The United States is very sensitive about interfering
in the internal politics of other countries." On 3/20/02, he said the
Justice Department was making sure to be "sensitive" in hunting down
terrorists. He said, "The agents and officers who conducted the
interviews did so in a sensitive manner, showing full respect for the
rights and dignity of the individuals being interviewed."

CHENEY & LOTT URGE MILITARY TO BE SENSITIVE IN CONDUCTING WAR: In
conducting the first war in Iraq, then-Secretary of Defense *****
Cheney repeatedly stressed the need for America to fight a "sensitive"
war. On 9/11/90, Cheney told Congress that he "was very concerned
about…the clash of cultures" brought on by U.S. troops being stationed
in Saudi Arabia, and that the U.S. must "try to be sensitive." Sen.
Trent Lott (R-MS) concurred, saying, "I would agree to that. I think
[the Saudis] are sensitive, but we also are sensitive."

CHENEY SAYS PENTAGON MUST BE "SENSITIVE" IN DEVELOPING WEAPONS: On
2/7/90, Cheney told Congress that the Pentagon must be "sensitive" in
developing weapons. He said that he understood the need for the
Pentagon to explore civilian uses of weapons-related technology,
saying, "I think we need to be very sensitive to that as a
department."

WOLFOWITZ SAYS MILITARY MUST BE "SENSITIVE" IN WAR ON TERROR: On
11/9/01, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, a key hawk on
military issues, said the armed forces must be "sensitive" to
religious issues surrounding the War on Terror. He said, "I think
we've made it clear we're going to be sensitive to the fact that
Ramadan is the holiest month on the Muslim calendar and we will have
that in mind."

OK Liberal's
Name me one Negative thing George W. Bush, or ***** Cheney has
said about Lt. John Kerry

That IS the subject! Name him one negative thing Bush said about

You can't do it, obviously.

That's because you are a Kerry Supporter, and thus far, far removed

reality.

So you Kerry Supporters are now trying to claim Kerry didn't say
"sensitive"?

Kerry's flipflops (and yours) are killing your Democrat Party, sir.

"owl_1971@hotmail.com"
<owl_1971_spammers_tongues_are_toilet_paper@hotmail.com> wrote in

news:5eCdnflGcqcTlqncRVn-sg@comcast.com...

Cheney took a quote out of context stating Kerry wants to fight a more
sensitive war.
In reality "sensitive" was only one of the adjectives.

Of course Cheney, *with is highly involved military experience*, had

offer his expertise.

I hope Americans don't forget how much the war with Iraq benefits

Cheney's

former company.

"Joe Blowtowski" <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7d08j0l01l60iqalb9fettbbemqcrr46qb@4ax.com...

OK Liberal's

Name me one Negative thing George W. Bush, or ***** Cheney has
said about Lt. John Kerry

try using Google to SEARCH the Whitehouse's Website for KERRY
< http://www.google.com/search?as_q=site:www.whitehouse.gov+KERRY >

Anything and everything that Bush says is transcribed there. Let's
see if you can do it using the REAL WORDS SPOKEN by Bush
or Cheney, without using your usual LIBERAL News Sources

I don't think you can do it.. unless you call FACTS from Kerry's
voting record Negative Smears from Bush...


now on the flip-side...
John Kerry has SMEARED George Bush on a Daily basis for
about a year.

Just like he did when he was smearing his friends and fellow
Soldiers, then Lyndon Johnson, and then Richard Nixon, and
then ex. Gov Weld, and then Ronald Reagan, and G.H.W. Bush!

John Kerry has a long History of being a SMEAR Artist, in fact
he has been smearing his 'FECES' on people his whole life.
OK... Lets forget that for now


Let's see if any of you brainiac Libearls can name me one REAL
CREDIBLE negative thing that George W. Bush, or ***** Cheney
has said about Lt. John Kerry


www.whitehouse.gov

Joe Blowtowski <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<16k9j0lfse9ou08lf7ckr8eg90b5qb6av5@4ax.com>...

thank you think4yourself2k2
OK
Now what did Bush say that wasn't true?

You're never going to get anything from these people. I tried a while
ago asking for specifics of Fox news bias and not one person gave one
thing.

wore a blue suit today, they would think of that as a negative comment
made against Kerry. Never even think about looking at his past record
or statements and stating that anything he ever did or said was wrong.
They will run around crying if you do. They can't face the fact that
their candidate is just "not Bush" and not Kerry himself. They are
forced to make any excuse for him so their vote for him seems
reasonable. They will soon see that most of the country disagrees
with them and him.