Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD



 Politics > Politics-USA > Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Charles Farley"
Date: 04 Jan 2007 09:34:06 PM
Object: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD
"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
.

User: "hol99"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 04 Jan 2007 11:04:13 PM
"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167968046.684353.142210@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

Pssssst! Here's a clue: they're all in on it.
.
User: "whiterose"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 04 Jan 2007 11:20:18 PM
Pelosi was duped just like we were by the Lying Fool. Bush has
intelligence that is not shared with Congress, therefore Congress
cannot know what the president knows.
Ergo, any member of Congress can be lied to as easily as you or I.
WR
hol99 wrote:

"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167968046.684353.142210@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html


Pssssst! Here's a clue: they're all in on it.

.
User: "can_o_worms"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 12:01:02 AM
On 4 Jan 2007 21:20:18 -0800, "whiterose" <nigelshiftright@yahoo.com>
wrote:

hol99 wrote:

"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167968046.684353.142210@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html


Pssssst! Here's a clue: they're all in on it.


Pelosi was duped just like we were by the Lying Fool. Bush has
intelligence that is not shared with Congress, therefore Congress
cannot know what the president knows.

Ergo, any member of Congress can be lied to as easily as you or I.

WR

Gee that's odd.....I wasn't duped by neoCON *****.
Been listening closely to it throughout the late '90s.
I knew they were lying before they rushed Public Law 107-243
(authorization for use of force in Iraq) through Knesset West
"There's no naive in politics."
Chris Matthews
--
Recent legislation sponsored by the
"American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran.
No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.
***************
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 105
H R 282 2/3 YEA-AND-NAY 26-Apr-2006
BILL TITLE: To hold the current regime in Iran
accountable for its threatening behavior and to
support a transition to democracy in Iran
YEAS 397
Too numerous to list but include Democrats Jack Murtha,
John Conyers, Maxine Waters, Bernie Sanders, Barbara Lee,
and Lynn Woolsey.
NAYS 21
Tammy Baldwin - Dem
Earl Blumenauer - Dem
Allen Boyd - Dem
Peter DeFazio - Dem
John J. Duncan - Rep
Jeff Flake - Rep
John Hostettler - Rep
Walter B. Jones (NC) - Rep
Dennis Kucinich - Dem
Jim Leach - Rep
Jim McDermott - Dem
Jim McGovern - Dem
Cynthia McKinney - Dem
Jim Oberstar - Dem
Dave Obey - Dem
John Olver - Dem
Ron Paul - Rep
Nick Rahall - Dem
Vic Snyder - Dem
Pete Stark - Dem
Gene Taylor (MS) - Dem
********
Did I mention that this legislation was sponsored by
the "American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran ?
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll105.xml
No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.
.
User: "Docky Wocky"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 03:41:29 PM
I thought members of congress were all adults, and hip politicians, too.
Seems like the big shot libs have been fooling their drooling fans, and the
next few weeks is going to show that serious lack of any talent but bull
shitting..
Citizen Democrats are all excited about taking over congress, when they will
soon find out that all the folks now taking up space there are stupid
assholes that didn't know the score in 2002, and still don't know the score.
God help us. They are so damn partisan, they forgot all about being
Americans.
I guess when your total qualification for being a congresscritter is that
you are a flaming liberal anti-conservative, you have to expect some
deficits in performance when it comes to playing in the real world.
Pelosi and company are neophytes in the world of international terrorism.
They were not conned by Bush. They were conned by the Arabs and their
political agenda. Totally conned. And they are too stupid to realize it even
at this late a time.
The liberal congresscritters uniform past utterences prove that they are
lightweights in the terrorism department, and to expect any improvements in
anti-terrorism foreign policy out of that crew is going to be purely a
miracle.
Thank God for the internet and the things that it doesn't forget.
When it comes to protection of the American public, will the first 100 hour
marathon of liberal legislation include anything that will protect plain
folks from terrorists, or will the entire time be spent on an orgy of social
engineering?
.
User: "can_o_worms"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 06 Jan 2007 01:24:09 AM
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:41:29 GMT, "Docky Wocky" <mrchuck@lst.net>
wrote:

I thought members of congress were all adults, and hip politicians, too.
Seems like the big shot libs have been fooling their drooling fans, and the
next few weeks is going to show that serious lack of any talent but bull
shitting..

Citizen Democrats are all excited about taking over congress, when they will
soon find out that all the folks now taking up space there are stupid
assholes that didn't know the score in 2002, and still don't know the score.

God help us. They are so damn partisan, they forgot all about being
Americans.

I guess when your total qualification for being a congresscritter is that
you are a flaming liberal anti-conservative, you have to expect some
deficits in performance when it comes to playing in the real world.

Pelosi and company are neophytes in the world of international terrorism.
They were not conned by Bush. They were conned by the Arabs and their
political agenda.

You been getting your info from Michael Moore, Docky ?
I don't recall hearing that the Arabs having lobbied for
Public Law 107-243 (Authorization for use of force in Iraq)
I don't recall any Carlyle lobbyist (James Baker comes to
mind) or any other Energy lobbyist pushing for a war in
Iraq.....or Iran either.
Only AIPAC, The American Jewish Committee and
neoconservatives lobby for wars in the Middle East.....Unless
you have an inside track on some illegal lobbying activity that
we don't know about.

Totally conned. And they are too stupid to realize it even
at this late a time.

The liberal congresscritters uniform past utterences prove that they are
lightweights in the terrorism department, and to expect any improvements in
anti-terrorism foreign policy out of that crew is going to be purely a
miracle.

Thank God for the internet and the things that it doesn't forget.

When it comes to protection of the American public, will the first 100 hour
marathon of liberal legislation include anything that will protect plain
folks from terrorists, or will the entire time be spent on an orgy of social
engineering?

--
Scott Ritter on YouTube
Israel's influence of US policy & the Israel lobby
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O125hGt9qt4&NR
.



User: "Charles Farley"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 07:54:05 PM
whiterose wrote:


Charles Farley wrote:


"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html



"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html



Pelosi was duped just like we were by the Lying Fool.

That must explain why Pelosi made the above statement in 1998.
"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more
the very kind of threat Iraq poses now -- a rogue state with weapons of
mass destruction ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug
traffickers or organized criminals who travel the world among us
unnoticed.
If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in
his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they
can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the
United Nations Security Council and clear evidence of a weapons of mass
destruction program."
President Clinton
Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff
February 17, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
.



User: ""

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 11:50:28 AM
Charles Farley wrote:

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

She sure got fooled, didn't she?
BLP
.

User: "Scotius"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 08:16:13 PM
On 4 Jan 2007 19:34:06 -0800, "Charles Farley"
<CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote:

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

Thanks for bringing this up, but the fact is there were none
there and there's no reason to stay; would you not agree with that, or
is this a pathetic attempt to divert attention from the man who used
an excuse to invade another country for reasons that he and his
cronies are not willing to disclose?
.
User: "Charles Farley"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 06 Jan 2007 07:24:19 PM
Scotius wrote:


Charles Farley wrote:


"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years
in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of
my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue
and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have
talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he
has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html



"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html



Thanks for bringing this up

No problem.

but the fact is there were none there

Then why did Pelosi lie to the American people?
But really, it's a moot point as decisions must be made with the
information available, not information that may be available at
some time in the future. The burden on proof was on Saddam to
comply, as John Kerry so nicely summarized as he voted YES
to authorize US military force against Iraq:
"So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with
us since the end of the Persian Gulf War.
In U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441, the United Nations
has now affirmed that Saddam Hussein must disarm or face the
most serious consequences. LET ME MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THE BURDEN
IS RESOUNDINGLY ON SADDAM HUSSEIN to live up to the ceasefire
agreement he signed and make clear to the world how he disposed
of weapons he previously admitted to possessing."
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

and there's no reason to stay;

Actually, the Resolution for which a great many Democrats voted
YES, laid out not only the reasons to remove Saddam, but also
the reasons to stay:
"It should be the policy of the United States to support
efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and
PROMOTE THE EMERGENCE OF A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT to replace
that regime."
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec02/joint_resolution_10-11-02.html
These are just a handful of the many Democrats who voted YES
to the Resolution:
Kerry, John (D-MA)
Reid, Harry (D-NV)
Edwards, John (D-NC)
Clinton, Hillary (D-NY)
Cleland, Max (D-GA)
Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA)
Biden, Joseph (D-DE)
Schumer, Charles (D-NY)
Murtha, John (D-PA)
Etc, etc, etc, etc...
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
I don't believe you could characterize the above individuals
as Bush "cronies." Also, they were all certainly aware of the
reasons to authorize US military force against Iraq, since they
all voted YES to the Resolution (the content of which was widely
published and discussed, despite the fact that you have forgotten,
or were never aware of, its contents).
Here's the text of the Resolution, so you can get up to speed:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec02/joint_resolution_10-11-02.html
.
User: "can_o_worms"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 07 Jan 2007 10:49:02 AM
On 6 Jan 2007 17:24:19 -0800, "Charles Farley"
<CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote:

Scotius wrote:


Charles Farley wrote:


"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years
in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of
my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue
and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have
talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he
has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html



"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html



Thanks for bringing this up


No problem.



but the fact is there were none there


Then why did Pelosi lie to the American people?

But really, it's a moot point as decisions must be made with the
information available, not information that may be available at
some time in the future. The burden on proof was on Saddam to
comply, as John Kerry so nicely summarized as he voted YES
to authorize US military force against Iraq:

"So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with
us since the end of the Persian Gulf War.

In U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441, the United Nations
has now affirmed that Saddam Hussein must disarm or face the
most serious consequences. LET ME MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THE BURDEN
IS RESOUNDINGLY ON SADDAM HUSSEIN to live up to the ceasefire
agreement he signed and make clear to the world how he disposed
of weapons he previously admitted to possessing."

http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html



and there's no reason to stay;


Actually, the Resolution for which a great many Democrats voted
YES, laid out not only the reasons to remove Saddam, but also
the reasons to stay:

"It should be the policy of the United States to support
efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and
PROMOTE THE EMERGENCE OF A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT to replace
that regime."


http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec02/joint_resolution_10-11-02.html


These are just a handful of the many Democrats who voted YES
to the Resolution:

Kerry, John (D-MA)
Reid, Harry (D-NV)
Edwards, John (D-NC)
Clinton, Hillary (D-NY)
Cleland, Max (D-GA)
Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA)
Biden, Joseph (D-DE)
Schumer, Charles (D-NY)
Murtha, John (D-PA)
Etc, etc, etc, etc...

http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html


I don't believe you could characterize the above individuals
as Bush "cronies." Also, they were all certainly aware of the
reasons to authorize US military force against Iraq, since they
all voted YES to the Resolution (the content of which was widely
published and discussed, despite the fact that you have forgotten,
or were never aware of, its contents).

Here's the text of the Resolution, so you can get up to speed:

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec02/joint_resolution_10-11-02.html

That's Public Law 107-243 as mentioned elsewhere in the
thread........About a bunch of half assed excuses and
speculations for the purpose of a war......a political task
for Israel......and no oil lobbies lobbied for it, btw.
Only AIPAC, The American Jewish Committee and
neoconservatives lobby for wars in the Middle East.
--
Recent legislation sponsored by the
"American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran.
No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.
***************
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 105
H R 282 2/3 YEA-AND-NAY 26-Apr-2006
BILL TITLE: To hold the current regime in Iran
accountable for its threatening behavior and to
support a transition to democracy in Iran
YEAS 397
Too numerous to list but include Democrats Jack Murtha,
John Conyers, Maxine Waters, Bernie Sanders, Barbara Lee,
and Lynn Woolsey.
NAYS 21
Tammy Baldwin - Dem
Earl Blumenauer - Dem
Allen Boyd - Dem
Peter DeFazio - Dem
John J. Duncan - Rep
Jeff Flake - Rep
John Hostettler - Rep
Walter B. Jones (NC) - Rep
Dennis Kucinich - Dem
Jim Leach - Rep
Jim McDermott - Dem
Jim McGovern - Dem
Cynthia McKinney - Dem
Jim Oberstar - Dem
Dave Obey - Dem
John Olver - Dem
Ron Paul - Rep
Nick Rahall - Dem
Vic Snyder - Dem
Pete Stark - Dem
Gene Taylor (MS) - Dem
********
Did I mention that this legislation was sponsored by
the "American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran ?
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll105.xml
No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.
.



User: "can_o_worms"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 04 Jan 2007 11:50:02 PM
On 4 Jan 2007 19:34:06 -0800, "Charles Farley"
<CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote:

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

Well no thinking person ever considered the possibility
that Democrats aren't part of the problem at Knesset West.
I knew Junior's neoCON backers wanted a war with Iran
even before the 2000 primaries and surely after Dubya
and all the other Republican Presidential candidates,
except for Buchanan, promised to take out Sotdam at
an "American Jewish Commitee" fundraiser during the
2000 primaries (televised on C-SPAN for anyone to see)
Do you think the phony pols at Knesset West didn't
know what was going down by 2002 ?.....a task for the
treasonous religious right GOP to be sure since Clinton
(who formalized the policy of an Iraq regime change in '98)
was prevented from invading Iraq by the left and the
third-party-spoiler factor as posed by the Green Party.
But how stupid could Democrats be, at this point, to allow
Bush, Hillary the Hawk or "Surge" McCain to attack Iran?
Were they worth my gamble to vote largely Democrat last
November ? That's the question: Do they work for us or
the Israel lobby (guess what: There is no evidence that
oil interests lobbied for the Iraq war but AIPAC certainly
did)
None that I know of are willing to warn Junior not to take
the unconstitutional initiative to attack Iran yet.
--
Recent legislation sponsored by the
"American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran.
No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.
***************
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 105
H R 282 2/3 YEA-AND-NAY 26-Apr-2006
BILL TITLE: To hold the current regime in Iran
accountable for its threatening behavior and to
support a transition to democracy in Iran
YEAS 397
Too numerous to list but include Democrats Jack Murtha,
John Conyers, Maxine Waters, Bernie Sanders, Barbara Lee,
and Lynn Woolsey.
NAYS 21
Tammy Baldwin - Dem
Earl Blumenauer - Dem
Allen Boyd - Dem
Peter DeFazio - Dem
John J. Duncan - Rep
Jeff Flake - Rep
John Hostettler - Rep
Walter B. Jones (NC) - Rep
Dennis Kucinich - Dem
Jim Leach - Rep
Jim McDermott - Dem
Jim McGovern - Dem
Cynthia McKinney - Dem
Jim Oberstar - Dem
Dave Obey - Dem
John Olver - Dem
Ron Paul - Rep
Nick Rahall - Dem
Vic Snyder - Dem
Pete Stark - Dem
Gene Taylor (MS) - Dem
********
Did I mention that this legislation was sponsored by
the "American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran ?
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll105.xml
No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.
.
User: "Defendario"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 12:20:59 AM
can_o_worms wrote:

On 4 Jan 2007 19:34:06 -0800, "Charles Farley"
<CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote:

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html



Well no thinking person ever considered the possibility
that Democrats aren't part of the problem at Knesset West.

Thinking folks have known that Democrats have been in AIPACs pocket for
longer than the 'Pugs.

I knew Junior's neoCON backers wanted a war with Iran
even before the 2000 primaries and surely after Dubya
and all the other Republican Presidential candidates,
except for Buchanan, promised to take out Sotdam at
an "American Jewish Commitee" fundraiser during the
2000 primaries (televised on C-SPAN for anyone to see)

Do you think the phony pols at Knesset West didn't
know what was going down by 2002 ?.....a task for the
treasonous religious right GOP to be sure since Clinton
(who formalized the policy of an Iraq regime change in '98)
was prevented from invading Iraq by the left and the
third-party-spoiler factor as posed by the Green Party.

But how stupid could Democrats be, at this point, to allow
Bush, Hillary the Hawk or "Surge" McCain to attack Iran?

Well, the voters don't actually have that much to say about it.
The real question is will the military blindly follow the orders of a
madman into the jaws of WW III.
You know, the big one that Armageddonists have been promising...
:-\

Were they worth my gamble to vote largely Democrat last
November ? That's the question: Do they work for us or
the Israel lobby (guess what: There is no evidence that
oil interests lobbied for the Iraq war but AIPAC certainly
did)

You make an excellent point.
It's been proven that the Iraq war was begun on IsReeLs behalf, at least
in part.
See the article here: http://ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=23083

None that I know of are willing to warn Junior not to take
the unconstitutional initiative to attack Iran yet.

Zbiggy warned Bushler not to go there, and encouraged the Congress to
impeach if he did.



--

Recent legislation sponsored by the
"American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran.

No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.
***************
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 105

H R 282 2/3 YEA-AND-NAY 26-Apr-2006

BILL TITLE: To hold the current regime in Iran
accountable for its threatening behavior and to
support a transition to democracy in Iran

YEAS 397

Too numerous to list but include Democrats Jack Murtha,
John Conyers, Maxine Waters, Bernie Sanders, Barbara Lee,
and Lynn Woolsey.

NAYS 21

Tammy Baldwin - Dem
Earl Blumenauer - Dem
Allen Boyd - Dem
Peter DeFazio - Dem
John J. Duncan - Rep
Jeff Flake - Rep
John Hostettler - Rep
Walter B. Jones (NC) - Rep
Dennis Kucinich - Dem
Jim Leach - Rep
Jim McDermott - Dem
Jim McGovern - Dem
Cynthia McKinney - Dem
Jim Oberstar - Dem
Dave Obey - Dem
John Olver - Dem
Ron Paul - Rep
Nick Rahall - Dem
Vic Snyder - Dem
Pete Stark - Dem
Gene Taylor (MS) - Dem
********
Did I mention that this legislation was sponsored by
the "American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran ?

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll105.xml

No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.

.
User: "can_o_worms"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 12:53:03 AM
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:20:59 -0500, Defendario
<Defendario@netscape.com> wrote:

can_o_worms wrote:

On 4 Jan 2007 19:34:06 -0800, "Charles Farley"
<CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote:

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html



Well no thinking person ever considered the possibility
that Democrats aren't part of the problem at Knesset West.


Thinking folks have known that Democrats have been in AIPACs pocket for
longer than the 'Pugs.

Quite right and according to Dennis Ross, during a recently
un-televised and widely ignored debate on the lobby : AIPAC
still holds most of it's sway with the Democrats.

I knew Junior's neoCON backers wanted a war with Iran
even before the 2000 primaries and surely after Dubya
and all the other Republican Presidential candidates,
except for Buchanan, promised to take out Sotdam at
an "American Jewish Commitee" fundraiser during the
2000 primaries (televised on C-SPAN for anyone to see)

Do you think the phony pols at Knesset West didn't
know what was going down by 2002 ?.....a task for the
treasonous religious right GOP to be sure since Clinton
(who formalized the policy of an Iraq regime change in '98)
was prevented from invading Iraq by the left and the
third-party-spoiler factor as posed by the Green Party.

But how stupid could Democrats be, at this point, to allow
Bush, Hillary the Hawk or "Surge" McCain to attack Iran?


Well, the voters don't actually have that much to say about it.

The real question is will the military blindly follow the orders of a
madman into the jaws of WW III.

Oh Hell Yes.
You don't see an active duty General Zinni around for long.


You know, the big one that Armageddonists have been promising...
:-\

Were they worth my gamble to vote largely Democrat last
November ? That's the question: Do they work for us or
the Israel lobby (guess what: There is no evidence that
oil interests lobbied for the Iraq war but AIPAC certainly
did)


You make an excellent point.

It's been proven that the Iraq war was begun on IsReeLs behalf, at least
in part.

See the article here: http://ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=23083

Boy I like those guys at the Inter Press Service News Agency.
Realpolitic reading there.
I've read articles admitting as much in the NYT during the '04
elections. (for anyone too lazy to peruse the AIPAC website
or google search)

None that I know of are willing to warn Junior not to take
the unconstitutional initiative to attack Iran yet.


Zbiggy warned Bushler not to go there, and encouraged the Congress to
impeach if he did.

I'd forgotten that Sen. Joe Biden did so after being repeatedly
questioned by Matthews on Hardball once.....It was like pulling
teeth......I think we know about how much that's worth.
It's the Dems custom to let the "Pugs" have their war and see
how it goes before opposing it.



--

Recent legislation sponsored by the
"American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran.

No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.
***************
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 105

H R 282 2/3 YEA-AND-NAY 26-Apr-2006

BILL TITLE: To hold the current regime in Iran
accountable for its threatening behavior and to
support a transition to democracy in Iran

YEAS 397

Too numerous to list but include Democrats Jack Murtha,
John Conyers, Maxine Waters, Bernie Sanders, Barbara Lee,
and Lynn Woolsey.

NAYS 21

Tammy Baldwin - Dem
Earl Blumenauer - Dem
Allen Boyd - Dem
Peter DeFazio - Dem
John J. Duncan - Rep
Jeff Flake - Rep
John Hostettler - Rep
Walter B. Jones (NC) - Rep
Dennis Kucinich - Dem
Jim Leach - Rep
Jim McDermott - Dem
Jim McGovern - Dem
Cynthia McKinney - Dem
Jim Oberstar - Dem
Dave Obey - Dem
John Olver - Dem
Ron Paul - Rep
Nick Rahall - Dem
Vic Snyder - Dem
Pete Stark - Dem
Gene Taylor (MS) - Dem
********
Did I mention that this legislation was sponsored by
the "American Israel Public Affairs Committee"
to effect an eventual regime change in Iran ?

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll105.xml

No energy lobbies pushing this legislation.

.



User: "Roger"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 12:48:02 AM
Who controls the satellites?
Who controls the CIA?
Who controls the NSA?
Bush does. Well, he's supposed to at least.
"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167968046.684353.142210@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

.
User: "can_o_worms"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 01:12:03 AM
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:48:02 -0800, "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Who controls the satellites?

Who controls the CIA?

Who controls the NSA?

Bush does. Well, he's supposed to at least.

Well having Chalibi on the DoD payroll should have been
another clue for CONgress.....Fired by the CIA as a fraud
in '98....Wanted in Jordan for fraud and singled out as the
source of the obviously fraudulent Mohammed Atta meets
Iraqi Security chief story by Pat Buchanan before CONgress
voted on the obviously fraudulent Public Law 107-243
(authorization for use of force in Iraq)
Everyone with their head out of their ***** at Knesset West
knew that the Bush administration had a regime-change
agenda for Iraq.....It's not like we haven't ever been lied
into a war before.....Lyndon Johnson and the fraudulent
Tonkin Gulf story came to my mind at the time.


"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167968046.684353.142210@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html


--
New neoconservative favorite Senator McCain at
"American Israel Public Affairs Committee" Rally :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34139976@N00/163949842/
********
Free downloadable BBC USS Liberty documentary
A BBC video from 2004 called "Dead In The Water - The
Sinking of the USS Liberty", concerning the 1967 attack
on a U.S. intelligence ship by Israel, is available as a
free downloadable AVI - Click your right mouse and select
"download" at the green highlighted URL site at this link:
http://video.yahoo.com/video/profile?yid=video_disseminator
(the file is large, 305 MB)
Video Codec for all computer platforms: 3ivx D4 4.5.1 freeware
http://www.3ivx.com/download/index.html
********
Sen John McCain's Dad Implicated in
Coverup of Murder of US Servicemen.
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.libertarian/browse_frm/thread/cfa8de1c0ec2a131/b2e32efb5882cb23#b2e32efb5882cb23
.
User: "SBC Yahoo"

Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD 05 Jan 2007 10:46:42 AM
Have no fear, mindless libs, your Woman, Nancy Pelosi, is in charge, and
she made her most recent statement of
"The Democratic Congress is now open for the children"
This might give an indication that she is either advocating child
molestation in congress, or perhaps turning the government into the largest
day care center in the world. Our children are not Nancy Pelosi's business
or responsibility, they are their Parent's business and responsibility.
Only in communist countries do the children belong to the state
(government), and liberalism and communism have the same roots in the same
swamp.
In the meantime, they (Dens) prepare their vast and numerous spending plans
for the people, all the while forgetting to tell them of the huge increases
in taxes it will take to pay for a fraction of what they have planned for
us. Liberal Dems (at least those with a job) will begin to like Bush, when
he begins to VETO some of their tax and spend legislation.
She further expressed her qualifications to be Speaker of the House as
"having 6 children in 7 years is the best training for this job." I'd say
it is the best training for being a walking advertisement for Birth Control,
and nothing else, other than very poor judgment. Yes the country is in good
hands with the new, communist Democrats, and may God help us, We will
probably need to apply for foreign aid from China by the time they have
finished, we (the USA) will be bankrupt and the laughing stock of the world.
As a side note, Nancy Pelosi is running away from mentioning that she is
from San Francisco, she does not want the rest of the USA to know she is one
of the most left winged politicians in the bastion of liberalism, San
Francisco. She talked about being from New Jersey, which probably caused a
exodus from New Jersey.
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:1itrp2tvagmgrl775c3dj7vg5ra0degnsm@4ax.com...

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:48:02 -0800, "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Who controls the satellites?

Who controls the CIA?

Who controls the NSA?

Bush does. Well, he's supposed to at least.


Well having Chalibi on the DoD payroll should have been
another clue for CONgress.....Fired by the CIA as a fraud
in '98....Wanted in Jordan for fraud and singled out as the
source of the obviously fraudulent Mohammed Atta meets
Iraqi Security chief story by Pat Buchanan before CONgress
voted on the obviously fraudulent Public Law 107-243
(authorization for use of force in Iraq)

Everyone with their head out of their ***** at Knesset West
knew that the Bush administration had a regime-change
agenda for Iraq.....It's not like we haven't ever been lied
into a war before.....Lyndon Johnson and the fraudulent
Tonkin Gulf story came to my mind at the time.


"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167968046.684353.142210@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in
office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where
stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my
top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and
on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked
about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has
chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get
nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html




"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html







--
New neoconservative favorite Senator McCain at
"American Israel Public Affairs Committee" Rally :

http://www.flickr.com/photos/34139976@N00/163949842/

********
Free downloadable BBC USS Liberty documentary

A BBC video from 2004 called "Dead In The Water - The
Sinking of the USS Liberty", concerning the 1967 attack
on a U.S. intelligence ship by Israel, is available as a
free downloadable AVI - Click your right mouse and select
"download" at the green highlighted URL site at this link:


http://video.yahoo.com/video/profile?yid=video_disseminator

(the file is large, 305 MB)

Video Codec for all computer platforms: 3ivx D4 4.5.1 freeware

http://www.3ivx.com/download/index.html

********
Sen John McCain's Dad Implicated in
Coverup of Murder of US Servicemen.

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.libertarian/browse_frm/thread/cfa8de1c0ec2a131/b2e32efb5882cb23#b2e32efb5882cb23

.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER