| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Charles Farley" |
| Date: |
09 Apr 2004 05:07:54 PM |
| Object: |
Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Charles Farley" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
10 Apr 2004 09:42:09 PM |
|
|
qwerty wrote:
Charles Farley wrote:
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
You left off this part from her statement:
Nothing was left off, it's called an excerpt...
"While I support the President, I hope and pray that this conflict can be
resolved quickly and that the international community can find a lasting
solution through diplomatic means. "
Why did you leave that out?
Because it was irrelevant. Obviously, the conflict could not be
"resolved quickly" and "the international community" could not "find a
lasting solution through diplomatic means" because Saddam continued to
blow off UNSC Resolutions for another FIVE YEARS, and would have been
doing so today had he not been brought into compliance by force in
March 2003.
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
10 Apr 2004 09:47:03 PM |
|
|
"Charles Farley" <charles@farley.net> wrote in message
news:ghbh70dpi661e8bdfq17hphk0ovtk7u5l3@4ax.com...
qwerty wrote:
Charles Farley wrote:
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
You left off this part from her statement:
Nothing was left off, it's called an excerpt...
Uh, it wasn't left off? Then why did you fail to quote that portion? It's
called quoting out of context to give the appearence of a different meaning
to the actual quote...
"While I support the President, I hope and pray that this conflict can
be
resolved quickly and that the international community can find a lasting
solution through diplomatic means. "
Why did you leave that out?
Because it was irrelevant.
Irrelevant? Clinton was advocating a diplomatic solution, NOT WAR!
Obviously, the conflict could not be
"resolved quickly" and "the international community" could not "find a
lasting solution through diplomatic means" because Saddam continued to
blow off UNSC Resolutions for another FIVE YEARS, and would have been
doing so today had he not been brought into compliance by force in
March 2003.
Well, the policy of sanctions, inspections and diplomacy WORKED. Saddam had
no WMD after 1998.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles Farley" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
11 Apr 2004 03:29:18 AM |
|
|
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote:
"Charles Farley" wrote:
qwerty wrote:
Charles Farley wrote:
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
You left off this part from her statement:
Nothing was left off, it's called an excerpt...
Uh, it wasn't left off? Then why did you fail to quote that portion?
You see, that's how excerpts work, you cite the relevant portions.
It's called quoting out of context to give the appearence of a different
meaning to the actual quote...
Nothing was "out of context." No meanings were changed.
Congresswoman Pelosi stated:
1) As a member of the House Intelligence Committee she was keenly
aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons
is an issue of grave importance.
2) Saddam Hussein had been engaged in the development WMD.
3) Saddam Hussein made a mockery of the weapons inspection
process.
Your wishful thinking will not change these facts:
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
Why did you leave that out?
Because it was irrelevant.
Irrelevant? Clinton was advocating a diplomatic solution, NOT WAR!
Clinton who? This is Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi discussing Saddam's
WMD and his failure to disarm. You need to stop sniffing glue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
11 Apr 2004 11:26:35 AM |
|
|
"Charles Farley" <charles@farley.net> wrote in message
news:8vvh701mfb646jl2bjhav3tlmpnlk78ht7@4ax.com...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote:
"Charles Farley" wrote:
qwerty wrote:
Charles Farley wrote:
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly
aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an
issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been
engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is
a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
You left off this part from her statement:
Nothing was left off, it's called an excerpt...
Uh, it wasn't left off? Then why did you fail to quote that portion?
You see, that's how excerpts work, you cite the relevant portions.
No, that's how misquotes work, you leave off the relevant portions.
It's called quoting out of context to give the appearence of a different
meaning to the actual quote...
Nothing was "out of context." No meanings were changed.
Congresswoman Pelosi stated:
So leaving out her advocating diplomacy, sanctions and inspections over
going to war isn't changing the context?
1) As a member of the House Intelligence Committee she was keenly
aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons
is an issue of grave importance.
And she advocated diplomacy, sanctions and inspections over going to War.
2) Saddam Hussein had been engaged in the development WMD.
3) Saddam Hussein made a mockery of the weapons inspection
process.
And she advocated diplomacy, sanctions and inspections over going to War.
Your wishful thinking will not change these facts:
And she advocated diplomacy, sanctions and inspections over going to War.
Your wishful thinkging that she advocated Bush's failed strategy of War will
not change these facts!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
11 Apr 2004 11:53:03 AM |
|
|
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:%keec.50466$JE6.32213@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
You left off this part from her statement:
Nothing was left off, it's called an excerpt...
Uh, it wasn't left off? Then why did you fail to quote that portion?
You see, that's how excerpts work, you cite the relevant portions.
No, that's how misquotes work, you leave off the relevant portions.
You are wrong if the excerpt quotes all
of the relevant data, which it did according
to the subject of the thread.
When you are discussing the Second Amendment
to the US Constitution, do you quote the entire
Constitution, or just the relevent parts?
Just admit your error and move on. We all
make errors, and it takes courage to admit
it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
11 Apr 2004 12:47:11 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:sDeec.17566$Lh2.11272@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:%keec.50466$JE6.32213@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
You left off this part from her statement:
Nothing was left off, it's called an excerpt...
Uh, it wasn't left off? Then why did you fail to quote that
portion?
You see, that's how excerpts work, you cite the relevant portions.
No, that's how misquotes work, you leave off the relevant portions.
You are wrong if the excerpt quotes all
of the relevant data, which it did according
to the subject of the thread.
No, you left off the reason for those statements which was to support
continued sanctions, inspections and diplomatic solutions as oppossed to
War!
When you are discussing the Second Amendment
to the US Constitution, do you quote the entire
Constitution, or just the relevent parts?
LOL, talk about changing the subject!
Just admit your error and move on. We all
make errors, and it takes courage to admit
it.
LOL, just admit you're throwing in a "Red Herring" rather than admit YOUR
"error", aka LIE!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
11 Apr 2004 01:40:46 PM |
|
|
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:zwfec.50489$Ef7.3154@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:sDeec.17566$Lh2.11272@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:%keec.50466$JE6.32213@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
You are wrong if the excerpt quotes all
of the relevant data, which it did according
to the subject of the thread.
No, you left off the reason for those statements which was to support
continued sanctions, inspections and diplomatic solutions as oppossed to
War!
This will be my last post. You have been
shown the error of your ways, yet you
continue to defend the defenseless.
What you posted was not a "reason" for
the statement posted. Nice try, but no
banana.
When you are discussing the Second Amendment
to the US Constitution, do you quote the entire
Constitution, or just the relevent parts?
LOL, talk about changing the subject!
From the rest of your response, I can
understand how this could be beyond your
ability to comprehend.
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
11 Apr 2004 04:09:10 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:jdgec.11883$ux4.2057@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:zwfec.50489$Ef7.3154@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:sDeec.17566$Lh2.11272@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com> wrote in message
news:%keec.50466$JE6.32213@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
You are wrong if the excerpt quotes all
of the relevant data, which it did according
to the subject of the thread.
No, you left off the reason for those statements which was to support
continued sanctions, inspections and diplomatic solutions as oppossed to
War!
This will be my last post. You have been
shown the error of your ways, yet you
continue to defend the defenseless.
Waaaaa, Waaaaa, run away you little right-wing liar!
What you posted was not a "reason" for
the statement posted. Nice try, but no
banana.
When you are discussing the Second Amendment
to the US Constitution, do you quote the entire
Constitution, or just the relevent parts?
LOL, talk about changing the subject!
From the rest of your response, I can
understand how this could be beyond your
ability to comprehend.
Gee, what brought up the second Amendment? What does it have to do with
this discussion?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles Farley" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
12 Apr 2004 10:21:31 PM |
|
|
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rocketman" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
12 Apr 2004 10:27:58 PM |
|
|
"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a12aa624.0404121921.63997210@posting.google.com...
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
I guess Nancy read the same false intelligence reports that Powell and Condi
read.
Refresh my memory: How many WMD's have been found in Iraq so far?
ROTFLMAO!
America will kick Bush to the curb in November. Get used to it, and start
writing your letter of apology for all of your lies.
R
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles Farley" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
12 Apr 2004 11:27:40 PM |
|
|
"Rocketman" <rocketman@bikerider.com> wrote:
"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
I guess Nancy read the same false intelligence reports that
Powell and Condi read.
Pelosi Lied, People Died.
.
|
|
|
| User: "qwerty" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
13 Apr 2004 11:50:55 AM |
|
|
"Charles Farley" <charles@farley.net> wrote in message
news:q1rm70dgfon5t2neoeruvb6jmbe7dis0p7@4ax.com...
"Rocketman" <rocketman@bikerider.com> wrote:
"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
I guess Nancy read the same false intelligence reports that
Powell and Condi read.
Pelosi Lied, People Died.
Nope, she wanted a Diplomatic solution! You left off this part from her
statement:
"While I support the President, I hope and pray that this conflict can be
resolved quickly and that the international community can find a lasting
solution through diplomatic means. "
Why did you leave that out?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rocketman" |
|
| Title: Re: Nancy Pelosi on Saddam's WMD, Failure to Disarm |
12 Apr 2004 11:37:31 PM |
|
|
"Charles Farley" <charles@farley.net> wrote in message
news:q1rm70dgfon5t2neoeruvb6jmbe7dis0p7@4ax.com...
"Rocketman" <rocketman@bikerider.com> wrote:
"Charles Farley" <CircularErrorZero@yahoo.com> wrote
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware
that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue
of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a
threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Also a member of the House Intelligence Committee
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm
I guess Nancy read the same false intelligence reports that
Powell and Condi read.
Pelosi Lied, People Died.
Only an unrepentant Bushlicker would feel emboldened to spew such
deliciously self-incriminating irony.
I'd explain the irony of your statement to you; but it's obvious that you
just don't get it.
R
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
