| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"National Socialism" |
| Date: |
20 Jun 2004 08:40:00 PM |
| Object: |
Nationalism FAQ |
Archive-name: politics/nationalism
Posting-frequency: monthly
NATIONALISM
Frequently Asked Questions
Copyright 2002 LNSG-writers
This FAQ can be found online at:
http://www.nazi.org/library/faq/nationalism/
Version: 1.0
Contents
--------
I. What is Nationalism
II. Why is it useful?
III. How does it work?
IV. Nationalist Groups
V. Common Fallacies
VI. About the LNSG
I. What is Nationalism
----------------------
1. Scope of Nationalism
Most beliefs address a certain area of the human socialization
process, but nationalism is a concept that applies in social,
cultural and political contexts together. It is not a system of
government, like democracy or totalitarianism, nor an economic
system, like socialism or capitalism, but it is a values system that
determines the goals and methods of a society. As such it is not
limited to being a form of "control" but is more a form of worldview
that, when shared by a population, avoids the modern disease.
As a worldview, nationalism also encompasses elements of philosophy,
sociology and spirituality. It both explains why humans behave the
way they do and suggests a sensible method in which actions can be
conceived and executed. As such, it is a design system, more than a
dogmatic or moral system, and can be applied at every level of human
existence. Furthermore it permits experimentation and variation
between its systems of government, social organization and
mysticism, so long as it adheres to the basic principles of
Nationalism.
2. Definition of Nationalism
Nationalism is most conveniently described as belief in organizing
human beings by their evolutionary and cultural branch, the nation
(or meta-tribe). Nations are defined by those who founded them and
their genetic origins, which means that the only people forced to
associate with each other on a political level are those of the same
ethnicity. In a nationalist worldview, each person from every ethnic
group esteems his or her own ethnicity above all else, and stays
free from supranational groupings, organizations or corporations.
3. Humanity as Pantheism
Two essential spiritual views exist for those believe in mysticism:
(1) that there is an external source of control for this world which
manipulates it, to which at death we all go, and (2) that the source
of mysticism in the world is either the world itself, or within the
world - material, literal and "real" - as we know it.
Nationalism originates in a view that for the purposes of
government-making, we must operate according to (2) until we
discover a consistent means of exploring the intentions of any
"other worlds" which may exist according to (1). As such, it has a
pantheistic nature instead of a "dualistic" (believing in two
"worlds," the divine and the real) nature, and suggests that any
inspiration for our current actions must exist in appreciation of
the now, including the diversity of nature, which should be
preserved and nurtured through an attention spent keeping unique
groups separate, so they do not adulterate each other and produce a
compromise between their genetic stock, culture.
This objectivist view of the situation as presented by the history,
spiritual systems and unbiased scientists of our tribe, in the
current globalist political situation, is considered heresy and a
sign of "hate" - these are methods used to fight nationalism, and
have no basis in a scientific disagreement with nationalism. Most
people in the current time are conditioned to fear "Racism" in
anything which asserts genetic differences between populations are
extant. For them, we present a brief overview of racial theory here.
Race-Culture Theory
"A theory regarding race which supports both the historical theory
and the racial theory of the LNSG, 'parallel evolution,' is codified
under something known around here as Race-Culture Theory. This
theory states that race and culture influence one another through
development of a civilization; one might paraphrase it by saying
that cultural norms determine what traits survive, and race is a
record of the traits a culture has chosen; further, the implicit
corollary is that a culture will be changed by the introduction of a
new race within its population, as these people having been
conditioned with different genetic determiners of survival will have
been developed to exist in their culture, and will recognize living
outside of that ruleset will bring ambiguity and death.
In this concept, races do not exist on a purely linear construction;
they are the evolving populations of humanity which arose in
parallel and each carry distinct traits which are handily specific
to the culture and civilizations which produced each race. A few
more steps of analysis suggests that race-mixing produces then a
step back in evolution for members of all races, as they will have
replaced specific traits - characterists rendered by thousands of
years of evolutionary pressure toward a cultural ideal - with
generic traits, or compromises between potential traits in their
genetic profiles.
Thus the basis of the LNSG's position on race is formed: race is
culture is memory is values systems, and these are sacred to every
population. While we are pro-White, and acknowledge no goals other
than preservation of nature and our own tribe, we are committed to
honorable treatment of other populations and above all else,
honorable separation of the races and injunctions against
miscegenation (race-mixing), population-mixing and most of all use
of other races for chattel slavery and/or hired labor alike."
- http://www.nazi.org/party/theory/race/
4. Nations as Ecosystems
In the nationalist view, localized nations of ethnic groups ruling
themselves are like human ecosystems in that, while they are fully
specialized for their location and its character, they have a high
degree of internal variation and different roles served by each of
their members. As there are mice and eagles in a forest, there are
leaders and implementors in any human society, just as there are
those who break down the old in any ecosystem and those who seek
opportunity for change, much as there are those creatures in nature
who burrow under the earth, make dams, eat detritus and destroy
other life forms to make paths of their own.
As such, there is no single appearance to people within a race, nor
is there a single genetic marker or composite, but these people
share among them the greatest commonality in genetics, adaptive
inclinations and cultural background. Thus it is sensible to keep
these ecosystems isolated as much is possible to prevent an
introduction of the alien to a large degree, which then destroys
these areas. Much as a forest in the hands of industrialized
humanity is helpless, so is humanity and its 15,000 years of
cultural heritage in the hands of its modern technological
dominators.
5. Nature to Nation
Following the example of nature, we can adopt biological
organization systems for human use, as was common in the ancient
empires of Greek, Rome and Egypt (long before they collapsed shortly
after admitting non-ethnic citizens). Each tribe rules itself, and
the meta-tribe loosely unites them, enabling trade and exchange of
ideas. Tribes may interact with others freely, but if they choose to
intermix, they are exiled from the meta-nation. There are no
allegiances higher than nation, and each locality is ruled by the
people who live in it most immediately (in small groups) - people
who know each other as distant but vital kin - for whom land,
family, tribe and culture are interlocked, interdependent concepts.
In this type of system, the widescale pollution, over-development,
economic servitude to distant owners, and adulteration of culture is
stopped; as such, many people have correctly identified nationalism,
whether of democratic states or totalitarian ones, as the only force
that can consistently repel globalism.
Globalism, for the purposes of this essay, is defined as any system
in which nations are unified in trading or military groups, or
through the system of multi-national commerce, meaning that what
unites groups is dogma related to economic systems, with economics -
and not the people, their culture and heritage - as the primary
goal. At the time of this writing, a globalist state centered around
the interests of the United States and Israel seems likely, and will
quickly assimilate us all into the cultureless "trader's paradise"
of the United States, with only religiously xenophobic international
tribes keeping their identity protected for reasons of compassion.
II. How does it work?
---------------------
1. What are its basic ideas?
Nationalism is built around the idea of parallel evolution, or that
people, plants, animals, ideas, concepts, and languages evolve in
multiple threads simultaneously. This encloses several ideas,
including that of meritocratic parallel elitism, by which multiple
sub-species of idea or organism refine themselves according to the
specific needs of their locality (or in the case of humans, cultural
goals). It also holds a concept of uniqueness and diversity by which
groups not individuals are the measurement of diversity, and they
are correspondingly isolated to keep them from being "averaged," or
combined with others in such a way only the compromise - lowest
common denominator - of their traits prevails. In a parallelist
system, mixing threads results in a decrease of specialized function
and thus a reduction of evolution.
Naturally, this runs contrary to the globalist and internationalist
ideas that, propelled by a worldwide liberalization making way for
larger populations and great profits, suggest we should all merge
into a generic population to become better consumers. Nationalists
hold that the ultimate extension of egalitarianism is conformity,
much as communism through its desire to mold people into generics
reduced the ability of cultures to compete where innovation was
required. Similarly, liberalism slowly bogs us down with social
pretense of equality and in effect, becomes a self-fulfilling
prophecy that crushes individuality, destroys cultures and provides
only distant idealized leaders who most commonly facilitate
individual needs, not things of collective importance such as
environmental reconstruction.
2. How does this apply to government?
Government must serve the people, and the needs of the people as a
culture, as a part of a natural system, and as individuals.
Nationalism is accepting of any economic system and most political
ones, although its values as post-egalitarian will conflict in
varying degrees with democracy and communism. Most importantly,
nationalism as a political standard saves governments from having to
participate in global politics, and allows them to concentrate on
working for the people and local needs, including environmental
ones. As such, nationalism is a superior basis for civilization as a
whole - with its component disciplines of politics, society and
culture - and benefits any culture who adopts it.
3. How does this apply to society?
Society is the part of a civilization which exists outside of
official constraints, but is influenced by them and helps effect
them through its cultural and social tendencies. A nationalist
society would accept certain ideas, including those of ethnic
independence, meritocratic elitism, and specialization through
localization that would thwart the tendency of money, power and
religious symbolism to replace the goal with the method. In society,
this can be seen most clearly in how we value money more than the
sanity and health of our families, as evidenced by the increasing
pollution, lack of family cohesion and social disorder created in
the churning wake of our political and economic "advancement."
4. How does this apply to nature?
Local governments, composed of the people who live in an area and
are specifically adapted to its unique characteristics, are more in
touch with what is occurring in that area and planning for its
future than some distant organization which may see a piece of land
fit to be converted into a giant factory complex, resulting in
massive pollution and destruction of natural land for the benefits
of others, while a tiny portion of the profit goes back into the
local community. In a nationalist system, local governments would be
guardians of natural resources and ecosystems, and would be able to
fall into balance with a national economy that limited its imports,
reducing competition and allowing its economies to reach an internal
equilibrium, preserving higher salaries and making an ever-
increasing demand for money less of a motivation than the health of
the community as a whole.
5. How does nationalism relate to the superpower age?
Previous to the superpower age, the last gasp of nationalism was in
Europe and Asia attempting to resist cosmopolitanism,
internationalism and anti-meritocratic systems of government such as
communism. Through the help of mostly the United States, the
nationalists were defeated by a much larger force, mainly because of
political confusion in European nations leading to them being unable
to unite against the larger American and Soviet forces. Similarly,
Asia was too fractured by competing financial interests to see the
wisdom of the Japanese and Chinese nationalists who were fighting
for independent empires in that area. The version of nationalism
from the 1940s however barely resembles what it is today, which is
both more Traditional and modernized/post-modernized relative to the
older version of Nationalism. The Nationalism advocated in this FAQ
draws more from the Greco-Roman, Indic and Egyptian empires than it
does from China, Japan or Nazi Germany, although we recognize that
form of nationalism as being inspired by the same roots and thus an
ally in common.
III. Nationalist Groups
-----------------------
An extensive list of nationalist groups can be found here:
http://www.nazi.org/current/links/
Groups recommended exclusively by this author:
1. The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party - a sensible,
emotionally controlled, traditionalist nationalist party which
incorporates the best and most citizen-nurturing ideas of the
past 5,000 years of human politics.
http://www.nazi.org/
2. Overthrow/Bill White - this highly intelligent young man
writes about the importance of Radical Traditionalism and the
utility of National Socialism as a device to further develop
white culture and society. He is also a candidate in his local
area in Maryland.
http://www.overthrow.com/
3. The National Alliance - one of the oldest Nationalist groups
in America, this group has a National Socialist and traditionalist
flavor with a good understanding of the classic works, ideas and
actions of Indo-European culture.
http://www.natvan.com/
4. British National Party - although heavy on patriotic elements
from the era of the nation-state, the BNP advocates a strong
nationalist platform with an eye toward tradition, reclaiming
the UK for the people who created it.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/
IV. Common Fallacies
--------------------
1. "You're racists!"
While understanding that race is culture is ethnicity is heritage is
nation is part of nationalism, it is one part of nationalism and
without the sensible respect for others and cultural self-
determination that is part of any healthy nationalist outlook, race
becomes a dominant hot-button issue which is considered before all
others in a paranoid, reactionary backlash, whether anti-racism or
pro-racism. What we call "racism" today, or recognizing the
evolutionary differences between tribes, is natural to all people
but only those with bravery admit it.
2. "You're haters!"
It is important for any governmental system to be assertive about
doing what is healthy, even adamant or voilent about it, regardless
of how it inconveniences others. However, it is doubtful that
nationalists are propelled by hatred.
3. "You're anti-Semites!"
Every group has its national character, whether currently in their
nation or not. Each group must have a national ground as its home
nation, including Semites (Jews, Arabs, and many middle easterners).
In the context of Semitic Nationalism, we are pro-Semitic.
By the same token, however, no nation should allow alien populations
to reside within except as temporary visitors, and in our own
nations we do not want alien cultures, which for many tribes
(Africa, Asian and Indo-Europeans most notably) does not include
Semitic religions, psychology or philosophy. Semitic religions such
as Judaism or Christianity or Islam, Semitic cultures like Judaism,
and Semitic bloodlines belong in Semitic nations. This is a fair and
sensible action, because every culture, including Indo-European
tribes, deserves its right to tribal autonomy.
Some will say that nationalism excludes Jews, because since losing a
war in the land of Israel they wandered the world in a diaspora,
living in host nations while practicing the culture, religion and
mental outlook of a Semitic nation. In the minds of these people, it
is anti-Semitic to deny these exiles a home; in the view of a
nationalist, every tribe must preserve its own identity in its
homeland, thus Israelites must return to Israel or create a new
nation in one specific area.
"The Egyptians worship many animals and images of monstrous form;
the Jews have purely conceptions of Deity, as one in essence. They
call those profane who make representations of God in human shape of
perishable materials. They believe that Being to supreme and
eternal, neither capable of representation or decay. " Tacitus, on
Judaism
4. "You're conservatives!"
Conservative is a modern definition which means someone who in a
liberal system embraces as much of traditional values as is
possible. To nationalists, this is a paradoxical outlook, as having
given up on nation and culture, the conservative has no leg to stand
on defending that society from its degeneration at the hands of race
adulteration, social reprogramming and cultural reduction. Thus, no
nationalist is a conservative, although nationalists are by
definition the strongest argument for Tradition and traditionalism.
5. "You're liberals!"
Liberalism arose from a belief in egalitarianism, or the equality of
all people in a political or religious sense, and became convenient
during the industrial revolution as a way of convincing the masses
they were "empowered" when in fact they had less power to ever
change the system around them. Liberal ideals such as democracy make
consensus on anything but the lowest common denominator changes
unlikely, thus one gets "panem et circensus" alongside sentimental
reforms based on grand statements of emotional commonality, not
logic. No nationalist is a liberal, although by its own goalset
nationalism embraces many liberal reforms such as: environmentalism,
diversity, cultural preservation and tolerance of the unique views
of other groups.
In the chronologue of history, the development of liberalism can be
traced from its origins in the Judeo-Christian religions, which
proclaimed an equality of man and the importance of certain "grand
absolute statements," such as morality and pity and equality and
social neutrality, over any of the values of the previous order,
namely those of tribe, honor, justice and independence. As we are
not of a Semitic tribe, we do not see it fitting to embrace Semitic
dogma, although Semites are welcome to if they so desire, obviously.
6. "You'll never achieve anything!"
Nationalism has been the dominant system on earth until the pax
judaica, starting with the adoption of Christianity as the official
religion of the Roman empire, creators of the previous era as
defined by historians, pax romana. Pax judaica has been home to the
most frustrating and destructive events in history, including
unchecked industry eating natural ecosystems, cultural and ethnic
dissolution, and globalist superpowers and corporations wiht
unprecedented control over nation-states and individuals. Change is
inevitable and nationalism has succeeded far longer than
"internationalism" has, so it is likely we as a species will switch
back to the previous working model, with some changes to keep
current.
7. "There's proof races don't exist!"
From the LNSG:
We've heard this one many times; all of the arguments against race
so far advanced by the mainstream society centers around semantic
ideas of race. Thus, they are easily defeated if one looks at the
arguments being made, despite the flashy "proof" (facts and figures
unrelated to the actual question of race) being displayed by so-
called intellectuals.
A. "There must be a skin color gene which also includes
intelligence" - fallacy: race is a collection of traits linked only
by their presence in real world populations. It is not a symbolized,
denoted or signal-indicated thing in the human species. It is an
extant fact of what traits were accumulated in what localities by
each tribe (as opposed to a symbol, or marker, of what the grouping
- something humans must name - of those traits must be). Tribes are
like neanderthals and cro-magnons: different evolutionary branches
of the same organism, contributing different specialized DNA. As you
can see, this argument against race and its variants attempt to
confuse the reader with semantic issues, and then, constructing of
those semantic issues a fallacious argument attributed to those who
believe in race, demolishing the "straw man" and claiming to defeat
the original argument by extension.
An excellent example of this is Stephen Jay Gould's "the mismeasure
of man," whose basic argument against race can be summarized as,
"Because there is no clear marker of race, or clear links between
these traits indicated in the genes themselves, there is no race."
This is a clear fallacy, as all racists from the older tradition
have indicated that the grouping of traits is itself what defines
race, without requiring any symbolic confirmation from the DNA
itself, as the grouping already exists by producing individuals with
that DNA.
B. "Scientists recognize race doesn't exist" - not true, although
some vocals ones claim this. Pathologists can identify human bones
by race, and races achieve the same statistical results on IQ tests
regardless of socioeconomic background. Further, there are many
scientists who believe that race not only exists but is an important
biological and social determinant, but these do not seem to be
favored by the publishing, media or government industries.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/1HMMZ63NZISL/
C. "The white race is intolerant!"
If the Indo-Europeans were as a blanket policy "intolerant" of other
races, they would have eliminated the other races using the
technologies exclusive to white societies when they had a chance.
They did not, and in fact repulsed invasions of other tribes from
Europe and allowed intermarriage and citizen transplants to the
reasonable degree that occurred during normal commerce with other
nations; until the globalist agenda began advancing the idea of "one
world race" and culture, the Indo-European cause to begin racial
segregation was small. Today, however, commerce and media culture
threatens to merge the races into one of uniform traits, eliminating
all nationality and the uniqueness of local populations.
D. "You should feel guilty for having what whites do!"
Indo-Europeans designed and organized the culture of America and
Europe, and built it with almost exclusively white labor (slaves, as
fewer than a million of these laborers, accounted for very little of
this advance). There is no reason to feel guilty for the successes
of one's ancestors, nor to assume that giving the trappings of these
successes to those who could not create them for themselves is
anything other than a symbolical gesture out of pity, one which
exacerbates the problem after applying a short-term, temporary
solution.
E. "Racism was invented to justify slavery!"
If by "racism" you mean "racial awareness in a social and economic
context," there may be some truth to this, as economic systems were
working against the nationalist model when "racism" because a
fashionable justification for some of slavery. However, looking at a
definition of racism from the dictionary:
1 - The belief that race accounts for differences in
human character or ability and that a particular
race is superior to others.
2 - Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=racism
This form of thought existed far earlier, and in our view, is
inherent to any species and its enclosed sub-groupings, races. In
order to specialize, one must resist breeding and thus notice what
is different about other groups. This demonization of unwanted
traits in others is both instructive to people in how to live as
members of that culture, and useful in keeping everyone from
becoming averaged, which by the nature of conflict traits reduces
any kind of overall organization to the individual, producing
someone with semi-random traits. This is the reason that
interbreeding with neanderthals in European areas was kept to a
minimum, and that ancient civilizations in Greece, India, Africa,
the Middle East, Asia and the Americas were rigorously racist in
construction of caste systems and racial hierarchies.
"The Germans, I am apt to believe, derive their original from no
other people; and are nowise mixed with different nations arriving
amongst them: since anciently those who went in search of new
dwellings, travelled not by land, but were carried in fleets; and
into that mighty ocean so boundless, and, as I may call it, so
repugnant and forbidding, ships from our world rarely enter.
Moreover, besides the dangers from a sea tempestuous, horrid and
unknown, who would relinquish Asia, or Africa, or Italy, to repair
to Germany, a region hideous and rude, under a rigorous climate,
dismal to behold or to manure (TGF: To cultivate) unless the same
were his native country? In their old ballads (which amongst them
are the only sort of registers and history) they celebrate Tuisto, a
God sprung from the earth, and Mannus his son, as the fathers and
founders of the nation. To Mannus they assign three sons, after
whose names so many people are called; the Ingævones, dwelling next
the ocean; the Herminones, in the middle country; and all the rest,
Instævones. Some, borrowing a warrant from the darkness of
antiquity, maintain that the God had more sons, that thence came
more denomination of people, the Marsians, Gambrians, Suevians, and
Vandalians, and that these are the names truly genuine and original.
For the rest, they affirm Germany to be a recent word, lately
bestowed: for that those who first passed the Rhine and expulsed the
Gauls, and are now named Tungrians, were then called Germans: and
thus by degrees the name of a tribe prevailed, not that of the
nation; so that by an appellation at first occasioned by terror and
conquest, they afterwards chose to be distinguished, and assuming a
name lately invented were universally called Germans." - Tacitus, On
Germany
V. About the LNSG
-----------------
The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party (LNSGP) aims to
restore a nationalist system of global government and to, within the
Indo-European population, restore traditionalism and the time-
honored culture, society and genetics of our ancestors as the
dominant cultural and political force. Our platform incorporates
elements of National Socialism, individual independence through
Libertarian ideals, an more protective version of the outlook toward
nature adopted by the Green party, and elements of European
Traditionalism. Our view is that if we fix our own governments,
other nations will follow and we can maintain an intelligent, non-
destructive global order based on mutual autonomy. We view globalism
and international capital and social dogma as the largest threats
not only to our own culture, but the whole of humanity and the
environment which nurtures us, as these alien thought systems do not
include analysis of vital aspects of any natural system. For more
information, please visit our website at www.nazi.org.
_
|_|_ Copyright 2003 (c) Libertarian National Socialist
_| | Green Party (http://www.nazi.org/)
[EOF]
.
|
|
| User: "ClassWarz" |
|
| Title: Re: Nazi Nutcase FAQ |
20 Jun 2004 09:34:53 PM |
|
|
"National Socialism" <victory@nazi.org> wrote in message
news:1087782000.14361@nazi.org...
Archive-name: politics/nationalism
Posting-frequency: monthly
NATIONALISM
Frequently Asked Questions --rest of neo-con Nazi stupidity snipped
ANTI-NAZISM Frequently Asked Questions
1. How many Nazi troops were wiped out at the Battle of Stalingrad?
500,000--enemies of the Nazis, such as me, would like to do it again!
2. How many testicles did Hitler have?
One. This is a documented fact of history--I am not making this up.
3. Did Hitler have a gay lover?
Yes, he roomed with one before the First World War--they were a couple.
Again, I am not making this up!
4. Did Hitler have an incestuous relationship with his niece?
Yes, with Geli Raubal--she committed suicide as a result of Hitler's
perversions.
5. Did Hitler and the homosexual leader of the SA, Ernst Roehm have an
affair?
Probably, danger of this secret leaking out caused the so-called 'Night of
the Knives' affair that brought Himmler into prominence. Himmler, the
Nordic ideal, LOL!
6. Was Goering a drug addict?
Common knowledge, no further comment.
7. Was Goebbels a crossdresser?
Yes, another J. Edgar Hoover!
8. How many Israeli Jericho II missiles would it take to wipe out all the
anti-Semitic neo-Fascists of Europe?
Probably about 75, and European cities are well within range of these
missiles. Nazi devils! Better not tick off the wrong Israeli missile-man!!
CLASSWARZ
.
|
|
|
| User: "Polaris" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Nazi Nutcase FAQ |
22 Jun 2004 08:39:24 PM |
|
|
One of the points on the National Socialist party platform was that
the party was for positive Christianity. This is what it said:
"The party as such, stands for positive Christianity but does not
bind itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession."
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
" But all that I heard had the effect of arousing the strongest
antagonism in me. Everything was disparaged-the nation, because it
was held to be an invention of the 'capitalist' class (how often I had
heard that phrase!); the Fatherland, because it was held to be an
instrument in the hands of the bourgeosie for the exploitation of the
working masses; the authority of the law, because that was a means of
holding down the proletariat; religion, as a means of doping the
people, so as to exploit them afterward; morality, as a badge of
stupid and sheepish docility. There was nothing that they did not drag
in the mud.
"At first I remained silent; but that could not last very long."
"And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with
the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I
am defending the handiwork of the Lord."
"Was not the Press instrumental in bringing in a state of moral
degradation among our people? Were not morals and public decency made
to look ridiculous and classed as out-of-date and banal, until finally
our people also became modernized?"
"It must be noted too that the attack on the dogmatic
principles underlying ecclesiastical teaching increased steadily in
violence. And yet this human world of ours would be inconceivable
without the practical existance of a religious belief. The great
masses of a nation are not composed of philosophers. For the masses of
the people especially, faith is absolutely the only basis of a moral
outlook on life."
"And the founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of His
estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary He drove
those enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God"
"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."
Of religion he (the Jew) makes a mockery. Morality and decency
are described as anti-quated prejudices"
"Anyhow, the Jew has attained the ends he desired. Catholics and
Protestants are fighting with one another to their hearts content,
while the enemy of Aryan humanity and all Christendom is laughing up
his sleeve."
"the Jew trafficked in the freedom of the nation and sold our
country to the masters of international high finance. So in our day he
has succeeded again, this time by raising ructions between the two
German religious denominations while the foundations on which both
rest are being eaten away and destroyed through the poison injected by
the international and cosmopolitan Jew."
"The most devoted Protestant could stand side by side with the
most devoted Catholic in our ranks"
"The National Socialist Movement must see to it that at least in
our own country the mortal enemy is recognized and that the fight
against him may be a beacon light pointing to a new and better period
for other nations as well as showing the way of salvation for Aryan
humanity in the struggle for its existance."
Here is part of a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, delivered in
Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist
Party Congress:
"Almost without exception, the intellectual leaders of Marxist atheism
in Germany were Jews, among them being Erich Weinert, Felix Abraham,
Dr. Levy-Lenz and others. At regular meetings, held in the presence of
a notary public, members were requested to register their declaration
of withdrawal from their church for a fee of 2 Marks. And this the
fight for atheism was carried on. Between 1918 and 1933 the
withdrawals from the German Evangelical Churches alone amounted to
two-and-a-half million persons in Germany. The programme which these
atheistic societies laid down in regard to sexual matters is amply
charcterized in the following demands publicly expressed at meetings
and distributed in leaflet form:
1) The complete abrogation of the paragraphs of the law dealing with
the crime of abortion, and the right to have abortion procured free of
charge in State Hospitals.
2) Non-interference with prostitution.
3) The abrogation of all bourgeois-capitalistic regulations in regard
to marriage and divorce.
4) Official registration to be optional and the children to be
educated by the community.
5) Abrogation of all penalties for sexual perversities and amnesty to
be granted to all persons condemned as 'sexual criminals'.
"Truly a case of methodical insanity, which has for its aim the
wilful destruction of the nations and their civilization and the
substitute of barbarism as a fundamental principle of public life.
"Where are the men behind the scenes of this virulent world
movement? Who are the inventors of all this madness? Who transplanted
this ensemble into Russia and is today making the attempt to have it
prevail in other countries? The answer to these question discloses the
actual secret of our anti-Jewish policy and our uncomromising fight
against Jewry; for the Bolshevic International is in reality nothing
less than a Jewish International."
Adolf Hitler, 22 July 1933, writing to the Nazi Party (quoted from
John Cornwell's "Hitler's Pope"
"The fact that the Vatican is concluding a treaty with the new Germany
means the acknowledgement of the National Socialist state by the
Catholic Church. This treaty shows the whole world clearly and
unequivocally that the assertion that National Socialism [Nazism] is
hostile to religion is a lie."
Adolf Hitler, speaking in the Reichstag on 30 Jan. 1934
" Imbued with the desire to secure for the German people the great
religious, moral, and cultural values rooted in the two Christian
Confessions, we have abolished the political organizations but
strengthened the religious institutions."
Adolf Hitler, in his speech at Koblenz, to the Germans of the Saar, 26
Aug. 1934
"National Socialism neither opposes the Church nor is it
anti-religious, but on the contrary it stands on the ground of a real
Christianity.... For their interests cannot fail to coincide with ours
alike in our fight against the symptoms of degeneracy in the world of
to-day, in our fight against a Bolshevist culture, against atheistic
movement, against criminality, and in our struggle for a consciousness
of a community in our national life... These are not anti-Christian,
these are Christian principles! And I believe that if we should fail
to follow these principles then we should to be able to point to our
successes, for the result of our political battle is surely not
unblest by God."
Adolf Hitler, to Nazi leaders on 2 June 1937, as reported by a
correspondent of the "Daily Telegraph"
"We National Socialists, too, have deep in our hearts our own faith.
We cannot do otherwise. No man can mould the history of peoples or of
the world unless he has upon his will and his capacities the blessing
of Providence."
Adolf Hitler, speaking of the Winter Help Campaign on 5 Oct. 1937
This Winter Help Work is also in the deepest sense a Christian work.
When I see, as I so often do, poorly clad girls collecting with such
infinite patience in order to care for those who are suffering from
the cold while they themselves are shivering with cold, then I have
the feeling that they are all apostles of a Christianity-- and in
truth of a Christianity which can say with greater right than any
other: This is the Christianity of an honest confession, for behind it
stand not words but deeds.
Adolf Hitler, in Nuremberg on 6 Sept. 1938.
National Socialism is not a cult-movement-- a movement for worship; it
is exclusively a 'volkic' political doctrine based upon racial
principles. In its purpose there is no mystic cult, only the care and
leadership of a people defined by a common blood-relationship....
We will not allow mystically-minded occult folk with a passion for
exploring the secrets of the world beyond to steal into our Movement.
Such folk are not National Socialists, but something else-- in any
case something which has nothing to do with us. At the head of our
programme there stand no secret surmisings but clear-cut perception
and straightforward profession of belief. But since we set as the
central point of this perception and of this profession of belief the
maintenance and hence the security for the future of a being formed by
God, we thus serve the maintenance of a divine work and fulfill a
divine will-- not in the secret twilight of a new house of worship,
but openly before the face of the Lord....
Our worship is exclusively the cultivation of the natural, and for
that reason, because natural, therefore God-willed. Our humility is
the unconditional submission before the divine laws of existence so
far as they are known to us men.
Adolf Hitler, in his speech to the "Old Guard" at Munich on 24 Feb.
1939
If positive Christianity means love of one's neighbour, i.e. the
tending of the sick, the clothing of the poor, the feeding of the
hungry, the giving of drink to those who are thirsty, then it is we
who are the more positive Christians. For in these spheres the
community of the people of National Socialist Germany has accomplished
a prodigious work.
VOELKISCHER BEOBACHTER, 24 March 1933, Page 1
[Hitler's Speech at second meeting of the Reichstag of 1933, on
23 March 1933, asking for the adoption of the Enabling Act.]
"While the Government is determined to carry through the political and
moral purging of our public life, it is creating and insuring
prerequisites for a truly religious life. The Government sees in both
Christian confessions the most important factors for the maintenance
of our
folkdom. It will respect agreements concluded between them and the
States.
However, it respects that its work will meet with a similar
appreciation.
The Government will treat all other denominations with equal
objective justice.
It can never condone, though, that belonging to a certain
denomination
or to a certain race might be regarded as a license to commit or
tolerate
crimes. The Government will devote its care to the sincere living
together
of Church and State."
Hitler said in a speech in Berlin on March 23, 1933 "The Reich
government sees in Christianity the unshakable foundation of the
ethics and morality of the folk."
In a speech delivered April 12, 1922, published in "My New Order,"
and quoted in "Freethought Today" (April 1990), Hitler said:
"For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people. And when I
look on my people I see them work and work and toil and labor, and at
the end of the week they have only for their wages wretchedness and
misery. "When I go out in the morning and see these men
standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I
believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil, if I felt no pity
for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn
against those by whom today this poor people are plundered and
exploited."
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.altermedia.info http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
