This came up in discussion with DC in another thread, so why not
expand?

I am not a racial, or individual, egalitarian. I recognize that all
people are different and some are more competent at others in the three
ways that count:

1. Intelligence
2. Strength/Beauty
3. Moral Character

I am a complete biological determinist. You are 80% determined by your
genetics,

This came up in discussion with DC in another thread, so why not
expand?

I am not a racial, or individual, egalitarian. I recognize that all
people are different and some are more competent at others in the three
ways that count:

1. Intelligence
2. Strength/Beauty
3. Moral Character

I am a complete biological determinist. You are 80% determined by your
genetics, with 20% free space in which you can either improve yourself
or decrease yourself (cycle of karma). If you work upward, over
generations, you can make something more of yourself; this is how we
went from bacteria to chimps, and chimps to humans.

I am not interested, however, in classifying other races are lesser,
for two reasons:

I. It's bad science.

What is the objective purpose of life? It cannot be determined.
Therefore it's hard for us to rank superior/inferior except according
to our own values and for our own purposes.

II. It's bad nationalism.

If Asians and Whites are superior, why not breed with them and make an
ueberrace, as Nietzsche jokingly suggests? What about a black guy with
an IQ of 160 - shouldn't we breed with him? ***** NO. We breed only
among ourselves, and there's no variance on that issue.

There's another reason as well, although a tangential one. To think too
categorically about this issue is to miss the point: we want to breed
better whites, too, and not all stripes of whites should be bred
together. If we mix Slavs and Germans and Italians and Irish into one
pot, we basically accomplish what our enemies wanted us to: we've
obliterated our heritage and become generic people who will in due time
become interbred with others. We must breed not only tactically (breed
with own race) but strategically (breed according to developed trait
clusters, and breed for the best we can get within our own tribes).

Nationalism to me is the ability to say "I don't give a damn if Negroes
are the best people on earth; my own tribe stays my own tribe." I'm not
a "Pan-Aryan"; I laugh at such ideas, which are generally only endorsed
by low-quality people who want to feel that they are equal to the
mighty Aryans. That's like saying I should go to Harvard because a
distant cousin did... it's not eugenic, nor is it nationalism.

This doesn't mean the bottom line changes. Multiculturalism is insane
and will destroy my people; I wish to destroy it, by any means
necessary. Judaism is an alien religion and Jews are alien genetics;
they must be removed from among my people, by any means necessary. I
feel the same way, as did Dr. Pierce, about most Christian and Buddhist
sects. However, I'm pragmatic about what I do, and about what most
white people feel.

Most white people aren't interested in slagging other races. They
respond more to a positive message about their own, and having the
balls to say "I want to be with my own people" takes more guts than to
complain about how Negroes, etc. are bad and therefore we can "justify"
what we're doing. WE DO NOT NEED TO JUSTIFY ANYTHING. Our survival is
all we must know. Also, most white people now have friends of other
races and they recognize the positive traits of these people. So do I -
I don't feel a need to disdain them, only to separate them from our
people.

If you want to kvetch about "racial egalitarianism," I suppose you
might have a point to some. To me, the big picture is about building up
our own race and separating it, and the drama and egoism of
superior/inferior does not have a necessary place in that. I care only
about the end result. Everything else is just distraction.

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=21207