| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"LNSG" |
| Date: |
22 Nov 2003 08:07:34 PM |
| Object: |
Nationalist News Network: November 22, 2003 |
November 22, 2003
|==============================|
| N3: Nationalist News Network |
| a service of www.nazi.org |
|==============================|
Contents
I. News
II. Links
III. Opinion
IV. Letters
Welcome to the N3, a publication of the Nationalist News Network at
nazi.org. Our goal is to publish news and information related to the
Indo-European Nationalist, Traditionalist and Classicists communities.
Unsubscription information is at the bottom of this email.
|== News ==|
Another Hollywood Role Model
----------------------------
Particularly shocking are the teen discos she used to attend at a big
nightclub on Hollywood Boulevard. 'I'm embarrassed to say I used to go
a lot, but it's just gross. It's just a bunch of girls half-naked,
stomachs and thongs hanging out, and everyone goes to the centre of
the room and dances. And the guys are like vultures, they circle
around and grab a girl to grind against. There's kids snorting coke
off the toilet seats. Ugh! It's like the seventh ring of hell!'
http://film.guardian.co.uk/interview/interviewpages/0,6737,1085992,00.
html
[ This sounds like a society with a mental disease, if this is the way
it treats its adolescents. ]
Still in Denial Over Air Pollution
----------------------------------
Children with severe asthma start suffering from symptoms even at what
are now considered to be acceptable levels of air pollution, U.S.
researchers report. Ozone, created by traffic, industry and oil
refining, among other processes, is the prime offender, the
researchers write in this week's issue of the Journal of the American
Medical Association.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/conditions/10/08/asthma.pollution.reut/
index.html
[ They refuse to see the truth because there's profit to be made. What
most of you don't realize is that your take is small, and smaller than
your wealth would be under a nationalist socialist government. But
what you have now is so tangible - you can touch it and park it in
your driveway and brag about it to your friends. Good thinking. ]
Democracy is a Religion
-----------------------
The forces of democracy, both Israeli and Palestinian, face an unholy
alliance of corrupt autocrats and scheming theocrats who will do
anything to prevent the light of democracy from spreading its rays of
hope. Democracies are richer, freer and, most important, built on
hope, not fear. And what some fear most is a Palestinian society
without fear.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/comment/0,10551,1059067,00.html
[ This Jewish writer says the same thing as the American president:
it's the pure and "good" light of democracy against a dark and craven
natural world, and it's our job to make sure "good" wins. If you
believe that fairy tale, you're ready for another "War to End All
Wars." ]
Suicide Doesn't Go Away Either
------------------------------
Faced with a growing number of student suicides, some universities are
trying to combat the trend by offering depressed students the
anonymity of the Internet to seek mental health counseling.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/EDUCATION/10/06/college.suicides.ap/index.html
[ This horrible problem - wring your hands - there's no solution! - it
just keeps getting worse! We've done everything but the obvious, which
is to stop trying to overanalyze kids and instead to look inward for
the cause of rot. Our society is broken and it's not a place of any
hope in which to grow up, so it's not illogical that kids are killing
themselves. The media barons would rather you keep approaching suicide
in a Freudian, e.g. futile and disconnected, manner. ]
Suddenly, Genetics is Real
--------------------------
A honeybee turns on and off 40 percent of her genes as she matures
from being a "nurse" to a forager in her short, busy life, U.S.
researchers said. The findings suggest that genes and behavior are
more closely related than commonly believed -- that nature and nurture
are closely entwined, the researchers said.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science/10/10/bee.genes.reut/index.html
[ You are your genes and as you decide what choices to make in life,
you shape your genes. You can opt to move up the evolutionary ladder
or right back down it, and the latter choice will make your enemies
happy. ]
|== Links ==|
http://www.whiteextinction.com/
Brings home the reality of the current situation.
http://www.whiterevolution.com/
White nationalists who are active in public lobbying.
http://libreopinion.com/members/resistlist
Practical worldwide resistance.
http://www.whitedate.org/
Meet like-minded Nationalist and Traditionalist people.
http://dart.jeeran.com
Asian National Socialist party.
http://www.overthrow.com/
Explores Traditionalist and National Socialist politics.
|== Opinion ==|
Interview: Craig Smith of the LNSG
Posted on Sunday, October 05 @ 01:14:26 CDT
Skadi News: Hello, Mr. Smith. Thanks for speaking with Skadi News. The
first thing people might reasonably wonder is how the elements of your
party's name mesh. Given that Skadi's audience is largely from the
racially-aware right, I think most view libertarianism as laise-faire
individualism while national socialism is an apparently incompatible
folkish collectivism.
Craig Smith: Thank you for the opportunity to clarify our views
through Skadi News. Our beliefs are designed to merge past
Indo-European values with present-day political tokens, so might be
offputting to people from every political background.
As an example, we incorporate Libertarianism to reflect our belief in
not infringing upon the autonomy of intelligent people who aren't
doing anything to harm society, culture or the environment. However,
traditional Libertarianism has pigeonholed itself into being a form of
"conservative anarchy" which we all know translates into a lack of
collective social direction. While our party values the contribution
of individuals, we believe that the individual is only fully expressed
as a member of a culture, much as the individual can only survive as a
member of a social species.
Similarly we are, like the NSDAP, supportive of positive environmental
law and of finding ways for business and industry to operate without
destroying our natural environment. Since we come 50 years later, the
situation is even more dire as our oceans, air, earth and bodies are
polluted and natural species are eliminated through lack of habitat
brought on by excessive human land consumption. As a result, our
policies are more extreme, and this is where we differ from the Green
party: we are not liberal or conservative, and therefore we do not
have to serve liberal views of respecting individual authority above
environmental (and cultural) needs.
In many ways, this is similar to what Adolf Hitler did in Germany by
combining Nationalism, a traditional form of government, with
Socialism, which by that name was a recent invention. He realized the
importance was to make Nationalism compete in the political system of
the time, and if it required modifying socialism to serve Nationalist
ideals, that did not bother him. It was a wise choice, and we hope our
own choices measure up to that standard.
Skadi: When did LNSG come into being?
CS: The LNSG began existence sometime in late 1996 when several of us
were discussing our options at a farmhouse in Maryland. The political
situation was dire; a massive shift to leftist beliefs was further
undermining any hope traditionalist politics had in the mainstream
spectrum, and the only people who seemed to oppose it were so
entrenched in cultist National Socialist politics that they had no
interest in effective change within the broadest segment of American
society, which is people of mixed European descent, with primarily
English and German blood, who through culture and sometimes
Europeanized Christianity follow and understand some traditional
beliefs. Our goal was immediately clear: we wanted to reach the normal
people and debunk the myth that fascists had to be violent,
ineffective, clannish and brutal.
Skadi: One aspect of LNSG seems to advocate separation or
'districting' of not only race but subcultures as well. For example, a
'drug-using' district is mentioned. Can you explain this further?
CS: Districting is one of the most commonly-overlooked solutions to a
range of problems. For us, it's clear that America is currently a mix
of many races and cultures, and it makes sense to preserve these by
separating them. Without separation, the thoughtless in each group
intermix, and it's a chain reaction from that point as members of
those groups begin mixing in a slow progression from the
least-thoughtful to the most-thoughtful as the concept of mixing
becomes accepted by that society.
Similarly, something such as drug use is appropriate for some, but you
don't want it happening around those who have not yet formed opinions
of life and how to live it. In the current society, we moralize drug
use, and say it's "bad" or "evil," and then ignore the problem. A more
mature response is to recognize that we can't stop people from smoking
marijuana or taking cocaine, so we should give them an area in which
to do such things so that the behavior is isolated. This has several
positive effects besides removing drugs and paraphernalia from general
circulation on the streets: users get to see what a community of users
would be like, and to reflect on whether or not they want to join that
behavioral group. Further, they are protected from predation by
non-users, and are integrated into the economy so drug profits no
longer go overseas.
There are other applications of this. For example, homosexuality has
often been a bugbear of American conservatives, but in traditionalist
societies it was "tolerated" in certain geographical locations. Gay
communities should exist and should be separated from those of us who
do not want to be anywhere near such activity, such as those
interested in raising traditional families in which heterosexual
breeding is recognized as the correct process of nature by which one
replicates the culture. While we do not agree that these lifestyle
choices are good for everyone, we see it as impractical to slaughter
these people and would prefer to coexist with them on good terms. This
means we do not interfere in their culture, and they do not have the
power to interfere with ours.
You can think of it on a biological level, because our bodies provide
a perfect metaphor. The stomach contains acid which would destroy any
other system in the body, and the liver contains many chemicals which
would be instantly toxic elsewhere. By separating these functions, the
body can have them operating at the same time but if all goes well,
avoid poisoning itself by mixing chemicals from different areas of its
function.
Skadi: OK. Just how far is this concept taken? I mean, what about
Gothic or other youth subcultures?
CS: It really depends on how far the subculture goes in isolating its
members from general society by behavior. Most Gothic people or
headbangers or punkers would fit in to a society which was not
constantly looking for deviants to single out as "abnormal" and
"evil," because the real reasons Goths and company rebel against our
current society is that it has broken values and presents them with a
bleak future. However, cities are not static things; just as people
move out of apartments all the time now, in the future it could be
considered normal to temporarily assign a few square blocks on a
probationary period to new subcultures. This would not be required for
most youth subcultures because, as they do now, they would probably in
the future exist within the mainstream of society but have specific
gathering places, whether clubs or forest clearings or something else.
Some youth subcultures are clearly destructive and would be isolated
from general society. For example, gutterpunks come from the tradition
that arose when emo ("emotional" punk music, very leftist) merged with
crustcore (extremist anti-social anarchism) and we got a culture of
mostly affluent children who instead prefer to become homeless,
encrusted in filth and begging on the street for spare change to spend
on drugs, their extensive costumes, and the pedigree dogs many of them
choose to own. In any traditional society, of course, this is
something akin to mental dysfunction, as it is extreme protest without
any positive action taken, so our goal would be to give these people a
reasonable area in the metropolitan area. It would be assumed that
they would fundamentally change it physically through their behavior;
this leads to another point about districting.
Districting is a two-way street. On the easy side, any group gets to
have their own area on society's dime and they get to make their own
rules. On the hard side, the instant they separate, they're recognized
as a form of society itself in subculture form, and that type of
social design is seen as being partially in competition with others.
For example, will the gutterpunk community be able to keep its streets
safe, reproduce itself and generate any art or learning or social
achievements of merit? If not, it will be seen as unproductive by the
rest of society. There may be no repercussions from that, but the
change in perception of it is all that is needed in a healthy society.
Skadi: Is Judaism considered sufficiently unique to justify their own
district?
CS: Judaism requires a district outside of the West, as Jewish values
(and Judeo-Christian values, including unreconstructed Christianity)
are alien to Indo-European peoples. Thus they would be sent to the
middle east or, if secular, sent to the mixed-race area, as Jews like
Arabs and other Semites are essentially cosmopolitan mixed-race
peoples composed of varied parts Mongol Asian, North African Black and
Southern Caucasoid.
While in our society we would encourage study and learning of all
cultures worldwide, and would permit and encourage their books and
ideas to be debated in our institutes of learning, we would also
ensure that our culture values promoted an alternate and, for
Indo-Europeans, healthier view of existence than the superstitious,
passive, introverted, cowardly and venal beliefs of the
Judeo-Christians.
Skadi: Is membership in the party open to all races and subcultures?
CS: Yes, it is, although it requires someone of intellectual and
ethical stature to start a subsection of the party for that race,
culture or subculture. We do not apply our own standards as
Indo-Europeans to other races and subcultures, but will leave that to
the talented leaders we expect exist in these groups.
Our party does not, at the current time, aim for the kind of
centralization required to have an official leadership which rules
over other groups. Were one to exist, it would be a very abstract
version of the party which would seek to ensure that our generalized
beliefs were applied as appropriate locally in each wing of the party.
What we would like to see would be branches of the party existing in
every culture on earth, operating independently of each other
according to the same abstract principles as interpreted locally
according to the most general concepts we espouse, namely
environmentalism, naturalism, belief in race/heritage and an emphasis
on heroic and classical values. These will differ in each group but
not so widely that these generalized beliefs will be out of place.
Ideally, at some point, there will be no need for the LNSG to have
these branches, but as the environmental, industrial and globalism
crises worsen, the LNSG and its beliefs will inspire and influence
local parties worldwide to take up the banner for change to
traditional values. It's important in this context to remind the
readers that the last thousand or so years have been a deviation from
the successful system of traditionalist values, and only now are we
seeing the deferred consequences of many of the beliefs and actions of
the last thousand years. Life for individuals is similar in this
respect to the life of an ideology: only in the last years of the
individual or ideology do you see the sum total effect of that belief
in contrast to others, and can you declare what its worth or failings
were.
Skadi: So no one group is "in charge?"
CS: Our belief is in separation of heritage/race and subculture, so
for the Indo-European wing of our party, we would only administrate
Indo-Europeans and those subcultures we deemed appropriate for an
Indo-European society. Certain subcultures would clearly fit within
this pattern, especially those that apply during the years of youth,
and others might not. Our belief however is that in a society with
healthy values, there is less need for "rebellion" which provides the
impetus to most fragmentation cultures.
We have no goal of world domination, but a firm goal of
Aryan/Indo-European isolation from the rest of the world. Other
heritages/races will not exist in our lands, and we will not exist in
theirs. This leaves certain questions of world politics, including
nuclear proliferation, up for grabs, but those matters must be handled
in the future by a society which has cleaned up its own psychology and
can therefore look at the external questions from a healthy internal
perspective.
Skadi: The 'green' element in LNSG makes some sense. The right has a
long affiliation with environmental issues and attitudes. Haeckel, the
German National Socialists and Devi come to mind. The contrast, I've
always felt, is that while the Orient often seems submissive to
nature, the Semitic tradition is hostile to nature by making worldly
things 'evil.' National Socialism seems to take a middle road of
cooperative participation with nature. Are LNSG's environmental
stances 'middle of the road' or something more radical? I notice ELF
is linked on your site.
CS: It's hard for me to classify National Socialism as right or left;
in my view, it transcends those artificial divisions (if you notice,
both right and left in America and Europe espouse primary liberal
views of individualism, social values and morality). As a result, for
us there is only tradition, and Indo-European tradition has as you
have rightly noted both in modern and pre-modern times emphasized
cooperation with nature.
Judeo-Christian beliefs, in contrast, have emphasized denying and
demonizing the material world and thus, placing an onus upon the
believer to dominate nature and use it for the purposes of symbolic
success in this world, while awaiting another "perfect" world where
nature's law does not dominate. To our minds, this is insane, and this
subtle but pervasive attitude is responsible for the ease with which
industry has consumed most of our natural environment and polluted the
rest. (Most of modern "Western" law is based upon Judeo-Christian
precepts.)
In this context, none of what we do is middle of the road, but I would
answer your question from the point of view of a saner society, in
which context what we do would be considered moderate. We advocate
working with industry to alleviate the tremendous financial burden of
transferring to a green economy; we support eugenics and population
control as these are the only ways to stop human land overuse, and we
are advocates of reducing the first-world lifestyle to a more
efficient one while simultaneously depriving the third world of
technology they could not invent and cannot handle, especially as the
rampant pollution and land overuse of the third world is increasingly
seen for the vast greedy destruction that it is. A sane society would
espouse all of these things, especially eugenics and population
control, but in current society that is taboo, as is telling people
they don't have a "right" to have SUVs and giant inefficient houses
and disposable products p
rchased cheaply at Wal-Mart.
So with that in mind, let's look at ELF. ELF is primarily a terrorist
organization with the goal of awakening global consciousness to the
environmental problems presented by industrial society, much in the
same way that the Unabomber was a terrorist spreading an ideological
message. You can see here how the word "terrorist" has been overspun
in our society to mean "crazy violent person"; ELF and the Unabomber
were *sane* violent people who realized that another soft-spoken group
talking about saving the planet wouldn't get headlines in the same way
that threatening the people profitting from natural destruction would.
The LNSG supports ELF, Earth First!, FC and other groups which are
working to wake people up to the ongoing environmental travesty of
overexploitation, and we don't consider these groups radical. We think
they are moderates forced into extreme tactics by the complete denial
of this problem in current society.
To summarize, I would like to say that if the average person sat down
and thought about the situation, they would realize that we are all
here because our natural environment created us, and that despite
hundreds of years of medicine we still don't even completely
understand the human body or why some things help it heal. It is time
to back down from our human, Judeo-Christian, moral absolutist
arrogance toward nature and recognize that we are committing a
genocide of our natural environment and it is one from which we will
not recover. Our current leaders and industry and the masses of
dumbed-down electorate who demand their SUVs and new electronic
products every year (it helps them feel "successful") will do nothing
to initiate this process, so it depends on us. And in the LNSG, the
"Green" part - as it was in Hitler's NSDAP - is inseparable from the
rest of our beliefs.
One way to look at this returns to your comment about Semitic
religions being opposed to nature. In the absolutist moral religions
of the middle east, nature is something which opposes the "pure"
nature of "good," and therefore it must be subjugated. These religions
detest the inequality between human beings, and therefore hate
eugenics, competition, heroism, merit and anything else which will
promote the more competent and demote the less competent. They detest
the difference between the sexes, and wish to equalize it; they detest
the difference between the races, and wish to equalize it. They wish
to dominate nature. What they don't teach you in school is that this
perspective is entirely a recent one. For thousands of years before
Judaism even existed, humans were content to work with nature and
natural hierarchies, and had no bigotry against the natural process.
National Socialism is a return to this pre-Judean viewpoint, and the
LNSG is the most recent version of this belief.
Skadi: I have to admit a sneaking admiration for ELF. They have the
guts to act. But, as with most 'environmental' groups, there's a silly
mix of humanism. The Sierra Club sleazes it way around the immigration
question. Isn't the real culprit two-fold? Western over-consumption
and population growth - and particularly Third World population
growth?
CS: My commendations on your analysis here, as you are correct. The
problem is twofold and by current means, only one side will regulate
itself - the Indo-Europeans in the West who will cease breeding,
allowing third world immigration, intermixing and overbreeding to
drown them out and eliminate Indo-Europeans as a distinct population.
Our view is that this problem can be controlled from the West, namely
by refusing further immigrants and isolating current immigrants in
societies composed of their racial and cultural peers, so that they
sink or swim according to their own merits and organization. Further,
as detailed above, our view is that population as a whole must be
curtailed; in our view, the failing of most environmental movements is
that they preach to Western liberals who will recycle, carpool, reuse,
etc. and still make a microscopic dent in the problem as a whole. We
need to have fewer humans on earth, and there is no way around that
problem. Even were our technology to provide for a world population of
20 billion humans, the amount of space required not just for living
but for "getting away from the madding crowd" would destroy nature.
Even worse, with that many humans dysgenic breeding practices are
certain, and thus it is clear we would become an even more thoughtless
species incapable of long term planning.
ELF is admired greatly at LNSG headquarters, but this is mainly
because they act. They have refused to take the environmental crisis
lying down and, instead of trying to become a think-tank or
product-selling social stance like the Sierra Club, they have opted
for terrorism as their method. Terrorism brings the problem to the
front of public consciousness and ELF have succeed triumphantly in
doing this over the past few months especially. Our hope is that they
continue, and others copy their actions, as this alone is waking up
more people to the crisis over overpopulation, overconsumption,
overexploitation and pollution that is a necessary consequence of our
current course in society. By overstepping the bounds of socially
acceptable behavior, ELF and others have made it clear that our
current method of conceptualizing society and human futures is, in
itself, completely broken; while this does not directly address the
immigration question, it does not sidestep it either, as have most
humanist-oriented environmental groups.
In the view of the LNSG, groups like ELF exist as products of the
current time because environmental issues are denied. When one accepts
environmentalism as a foundation of any new belief, it becomes clear
that the human individual does not take precedence over all other
values, and thus we dethrone the individual and the concepts of
individual rights and the sanctity of life that, derived from the
Jewish and later Christian religions, have permeated the West for so
long and have allowed rampant industrial exploitation to become the
norm. From this perspective, people can lift the blinders of
death-fear from their eyes and realize that all people are not
"equal," and that not all races are the same and that not all of them
need to immigrate to the West or to be tolerated, genetically and
ideologically, in Indo-European society. Right now the direction in
which our society is heading is so incorrect, so pointless and
thoughtless, that it's almost too big of a question to tackle - "What
are we doing wrong, and how do we go right?" - so it is intelligent
that groups like ELF bite off what they can chew and start with a core
issue from which every other issue, including preservation of heritage
and race, descends.
Skadi: Why not mass deportation? Some might say that prior to 1950 the
world was neatly districted along ethnic lines. It's not as if the 33
million foreign-born 'Americans' don't have countries of their own.
From an environmental stand point, the mass movement of people to
advanced nations with high artificial carrying capacities stresses the
receiving nation and leaves the donar nation 'free' to breed. In most
cases, these advanced nations were displaying encouraging signs of
birth-rate stabilization. Don't we, at some point, have to enable
nature to 'fight back?' Do you support repatriation to any degree?
CS: Repatriation is a wonderful idea and we do not in any way oppose
it. There are two major environmental problems related to population
at the current time, and you've touched on both of them. The most
evident problem is first world overuse of resources, but the problem
no one wishes to speak of is third world overpopulation. Our belief is
that if Indo-Europeans consolidate their own society and stop offering
handouts, those who cannot achieve what Indo-European society has will
realize that they are not welcome in Indo-European society, and thus
will cease reliance on overbreeding and emigration as an "escape
valve." Currently, we offer a better way of life to anyone from the
third world who can make it to the West and claim he/she was
persecuted by any one of the demons of the third world; when this
changes, and when the relatively more prosperous Indo-European society
ejects mixed-race people to a society of their own, it is likely that
mixed-race society will collapse into third-world-style government and
thus will offer no better option to people in the homeland.
As you noted, when this escape valve is shut off, nature will "fight
back" by forcing these people to equalize populations within their
home countries, and this will check rampant third-world overbreeding.
It would be LNSG policy to cease all exports of technology to these
lands, and alternately, to develop technology in the West to replicate
the raw materials and resources found in the third world so no contact
would be required. This would entail massive investment in Western
infrastructure and the development of entirely new industries,
employing millions of Indo-European men and women in challenging and
highly paid jobs.
Skadi: Would you intervene in a region, or even a district,
experiencing starvation? Or let nature take its course?
CS: Our stance on hard-core misanthropic environmentalism is that it
is an inevitable viewpoint to adopt when one considers the resources
of earth. Currently, we have more than six billion humans on this
planet, and the consumption and waste they require is both denuding
and poisoning the planet. Ideally, humans would occupy a relatively
small area on planet earth, which would give nature the space it needs
to have multiple fault-tolerant systems for managing climate and
biological diversity. Therefore, in our view, the existing population
needs to be reduced through positive eugenics, and no future human
expansion must take place. In this view, of course, food aid is
insane, and, coming about the long way to answer your question, thus
our stance is that areas which are experiencing starvation must be
left alone to allow starvation to cull the population back to a
manageable size. In the Judeo-Christian "Western" view, this is
unconscionable in that individuals - "souls" - are permitted to die
and thus their individual rights and worth as human beings (et cetera)
are violated, but in our view the whole of the system, including
non-human lifeforms, and its health are more important than any
individual lives. Also, we ask people to be pragmatic: if an area
cannot support population, why force the issue? There is no reason to
assume that more humans is a better direction for our species to take
than a focus on fewer, but smarter, stronger, healthier and braver
humans.
I'll go further here, and say that societies choose either to be
eugenic or dysgenic. A dysgenic society accepts people simply because
they are human, and seeks quantity over quality; a eugenic society is
willing to make the (emotionally difficult) decisions to promote the
breeding of those who are smarter, stronger, braver, and capable of
making more complex decisions, and as a necessary consequence, to
allot fewer resources for the breeding of the less-capable,
less-intelligent, less-strong, and less-brave/of less leadership
ability. To our religiously-brainwashed population in the West at the
current time, this seems like blasphemy because, after all, all people
are equal. To our mindset however it is a way of channeling the energy
of life into fewer and more effective people so that we don't overrun
our planet while breeding ourselves into less-competent people.
Discrimination between two brands of cars to pick the better brand
eventually starves the companies which make less functional vehicles;
discrimination in favor of people who have a balance of intelligent,
strength, honor and bravery bred into them produces better human
beings but, naturally, as resources are given to the more intelligent
end of the spectrum, there is less available for the less capable. Our
view is that positive eugenics focuses first on promoting those who
are strong, and secondarily attempts to convince the less capable to
not breed or to accept state-sponsored retirement in exchange for
sterility. While this is expensive, it ensures that the next
generation will be exponentially more powerful than the current
generation, and thus that they will follow up on these policies and
will breed increasingly more powerful people.
Skadi: Does LNSG have a home city or region right now?
Currently, we have members active in Virginia, Missouri and Texas,
with more people joining our street teams in other states every day.
Our goal is to recruit people who will work with us to spread our
beliefs and knowledge in every part of the world where people of
Indo-European descent are living. Daily an average of four new people
sign up to become potential members. The main area we're experiencing
growth is in the number of people who are viewing our site and,
apparently, passing on the URLs or the information they find therein
through political channels.
Skadi: How do you propose to be more effective than previous attemtps?
You mentioned street teams. Is there a direct outlet for LNSG
activism? And does it serve to remove the old stigmas?
CS: The plan for activism can be expressed two ways: what we're doing
at the present time, and what is intended for the entire life of the
party as it responds to the different sociopolitical contexts in which
it will potentially operate. For the current time, our goal is to
demystify National Socialism and extreme environmentalism and to make
this association clear to the remaining thinking people on planet
earth. Most people in every society are not thinkers, but at this
time, with television and job-allegiance and mainstream politics being
the thorough stream of distraction that it is, few of the
intellectuals can even think on the level needed to understand why
leftist and rightist value conflicts are solved in third position
ideals. We are not populists, so for now, our goal is to reach
intelligent people and to show them the real reasons behind our
ideals, in dramatic contrast to the Hollywood vision as seen in, for
example, "American History X" and "Save the Last Dance."
Skadi: Thank You for taking the time to speak with Skadi News, Mr.
Smith. Any parting comments?
CS: We appreciate your publishing this interview, and thank you for
taking the time to pose insightful and relevant questions. If I had to
make any generalized comment, it would be this: humanity is at a
crossroads between two choices. One is to let technology dominate us,
and to become servants to the social values required for an industrial
society, and the other option is to dominate technology and to make it
serve our traditional values, including preservation of our natural
environment. If we don't start making choices soon, we will be
dependent on technology to replace our ruined planet and our society
will wholly lack any heroic or eugenic ambitions. I think most people
don't realize how bored and dissatisfied they are in this
convenience-oriented society, but if one thinks for a minute, it's
clear that while life now is convenient, and we have lots of
entertainment and electronic toys, the meaning has gone out of society
and it has become a form without a purpose except to maintain itself.
If we choose to do so now, we can get back on track, fix our problems
and move ahead to a more vital, less-uniform existence, and while the
value to this isn't obvious in the first ten seconds of thinking about
the issue, it is after that point, and I think as society's problems
increase as do boredom and frustration, more people are going to think
on this issue long enough to move ahead to that point of view. I
praise Skadi News and all other organizations willing to think within
these parameters for their foresight, and encourage all intellectually
brave people and free spirits to join us.
http://skadi.info/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=102&mode=&ord
er=0&thold=0
|== Letters ==|
From: "Trevor Poulsen - Portland, Oregon" <trevorpoulsen@email.com>
To: "Craig Smith" <craig@nazi.org>
Date: Web, 12 Nov 2003 00:16:04 -0800
Subject: NS and monogamy
On 12 Nov 2003 at 0:16, Trevor Poulsen - Portland, Oregon wrote:
What are your beliefs regarding proper sexual relations between
people? Have you considered the possibility that monogamous cultures
are eugenic? (Greece, Rome and especially 12th-19th Century Europe
were exceptions in a world of polygamists.)
[ Our belief is that any action which requires longer-term planning
will be eugenic. Dumber people can plan two weeks ahead in their
lives, but smarter ones can plan for years of involvement. Only the
latter group will produce anything of lasting importance. ]
From:
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:17:54 EDT
Subject: Nobody thinks of it,
To:
Nobody thinks of it, but more people died in the Soviet Gulag than in
the Nazi Concentration Camps. And the Soviet Communists were even
more vicious, savage, and sadistic about how they had captured,
tortured, and killed their victims. It is just easier for the US
Media to turn a blind eye, because most of the Soviet Communists'
victims were not Jews, were just Goyim. Goyim, in their eyes, are
less worthy victims.
[ Many people think of it, but few mention it, because goyim are
assumed to be the majority and therefore responsible for making sure
"everyone" is treated equally, if they want to be considered good
guys. Basically, there's no guilt markup on goyim, but on Jews? Only
suckers pay retail. ]
From: "the Kaiser" <jjmadboy@hotmail.com>
To: <>
Subject: WAKE UP!!!!!
Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 14:54:10 -0700
I think you should re-think your stance against the Jews. I shall send
you another e-mail with a link that I want you to read regarding the
Muslums. THEY ARE A MUCH, MUCH BIGGER THREAT!!! Jews are few and far
between and can be dealt with later. I reall dont care for them either
way, but for now we must use them for our interests in the middle
east. If the current Goverment controls the Oil industry, future
Goverments (i.e. LNSGP, National Alliance, whoever.) will be
automaticly thrown in to a position of Immediate power. I will send
you a link and then I will leave you to decide. If you still dont get
it, then I guess I oppose your organization. But I will always keep
your stance on Animal rights.
[ This assumes that oil is our only energy source, and we that we need
the middle east to have oil. Neither supposition is true. Our stance
is that all races need be separated and self-governing, only, so I
think we've got your concerns already covered. ]
From: "Muhammed OBAID" <night_terrorist@hotmail.com>
To:
Subject: info required
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:13:34 +0500
Dear sir,
i would like to have information on how to become a memeber of this
party.
I should add that i am actually an Arab but honestly speaking i agree
with all the concepts and understandings of nationalism. so please
dont make for me obstacles to join you. i have always been fond of
Nazis and i can be one of them too.
Best wishes.
[ Thank you for writing. As explained above to a gentleman having
concerns about internationalist effects on nationalism, the importance
is that every group have its own nationalist party. Those of us
working with the party now are all Indo-Europeans, so the optimum
solution is to have Arabs also start a nationalist party whom we can
endorse, support and promote. We will contact you in the future about
this. ]
(c) 2003 Nationalist News Network at www.nazi.org
To unsubscribe, please visit: http://www.nazi.org/current/mailist/
Send all letters and questions to:
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
