On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:16:34 -0400, "XTS" <xts@woh.rr.com> wrote:

I'm familiar with Sun-Tzu, but I am also familiar withe the Analects Of
Confucious, and the wisdom of Siddhartha. Bush had no reason for war,
therefore his war can be nothing but futile, and he cannot win somthing

on lies, deception, or simply without good intent.

Bush did indeed have his own personal if not contrived reasons for
attacking invading and occupying Iraq.

that he was hell-bent on not only removing Hussein and executing
regime change, but he had the Neo-con PNAC blueprint for the region in
terms of a Western military presence in the region. And of course
that is history, and of course and the saying, 'that the road to
disaster is paved with good intentions,' most certainly applies.

This nation should have known bush had ulterior motive to any battle plan

may concoct. He had Colin Powell at his disposal, and he put him at the
State dept, and placed the senile, crazy old man he plucked out of Serl
Phar. Rummy for the Defense Dept. I mean for God's sake, why didn't that
capture more attention than it did. I swear Tag, when he announced that I
brought it up to people and they did not think it was anything to worry
about. If you have Colin Powell and don't put him in the Penatgon over
rummy, the fish are already stinking up the joint! The DoD was in

hands from day one.

Bush 41 did everything he could to help his boy early on by dredging
up political dinosaurs such as Rumsfeld. And it comes with little to
no wonder why he is in the political quagmire he is in now - I refer
back to my earlier citation involving how former JCS Chairman Myers
was selected over Admiral Clark and that alone showed just how narrow
Rumsfeld's scope and understanding of the military was, even though
served, yet not in an combat, or operational sense of the service. In
fact, his stint in the service resembles the Chimp's time in the
reserves and Guard, but didn't go AWOL and was in fact rated and an
instructor. Needless to say, the DoD is a dynamic political organism
and when managed correctly may be effective in addressing the
threat(s) now confronting the nation - However, and to this point with
Gates is a wait-and-see, and I'm wondering why he hasn't been handed
the baton of "War Czar," and renaming the Dept. of Defense to the
"Department of War" - http://tinyurl.com/ysvvpo and to cut through the
rhetoric and semantic B.S.

--Bush's veto is a veto against the will of We The People Tag. He crossed
the line from president to Dictator the other morning when he told

what we voted for. That is not his right. It is not his job to

our election results to fit his twisted plans in Iraq. When we vote vote

democrats with a clear message, it is not his job to cloud that message
with his madness. However, he did get smacked down when he sent Patreaus

both chambers and he got no results. OUR CONGRESS did not go off message
even for the general. I was proud.

Gen. Petraeus, IMO is a pragmatist - He knows that he is being drawn
into this political mudslinging of which direction to go in Iraq and
doesn't like it one bit - In fact, most senior officers in the
military who are worth their salt would rather do without such
politicking and to simply do the job that they are charged with - He
knows that Bush and this Administration is using him as a tool, and
what he does and says from her on with become history, and a history
that he would prefer not to be associated with if in fact this
completely blows up in this Adminstration's face. Furthermore, it
doesn't help when the Commander-in-Chief looks upon himself as the
King of the country and what 'he says goes,' and feels that he can
scapegoat anyone, at anytime.

Now Tag, you are getting to the real root of the situation, and I'm glad
someone is.

Likewise.

You see bush cannot be succesful. Not now, not at this time. He should

it by now. He has had nothing but one thing after another blow up in his
face since his re-election. His sub standard intellect and his groomed

of ***** kissers will not allow him to see or understand why. One man in

administration knows why, and thats ***** Cheney, but he still insists on
trying to pound the square peg in the round hole, because he, at this

has no choice. But, that old codger has personally manipulated our

for a long time, and is the father of the Military Indiustrial complex,

he knows why it's all going bad, but he still wants to take the money and
run. Cheney is the quintessential Manchurian Candidate. He is the man,
owned by private corpoartions to turn the US into what we are on the

of now. What you said about Bush for all of his faults is true. This
nations, and the world at large will be a better place when he and cheney
are gone.

Absolutely. Cheney is Oz. He's that creepy old unassuming
personfication of all things bad that is happening to this
Administration, if not the country. For Christsakes, he shoots a man
in the face during some fake-***** drunken hunting party and the victim
goes on national television and basically declares, "Thank you, sir.
May I have another?" . . . That is 'power.' And a very evil one at
that.

There is something from Homer I like to think about when I think of the

of 4, Bush. Cheney, Rice and Rummy... "Their glory walks hand in hand

their doom." They are to busy with their glory to see their impending

You certainly know your history, and that which I applaud, but I think
Gandhi put it best . . ." What difference does it make to the dead,
the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought
under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and
democracy?"

The war Czar is very pecurliar move thing for a man like to bush to

He's so consumed with his role as commander, that a Czar could actually

nothing more than a weird bush alter-ego of some sort. I think he just

a fall guy to trot in front of Senate Commitees since American is back to
oversight. He just needs someone to tie to the whipping post, because

sure it wont be him.

Bingo. Have a great weekend.


http://tagheuerblog.blogspot.com/

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:16:34 -0400, "XTS" <xts@woh.rr.com> wrote:

I'm familiar with Sun-Tzu, but I am also familiar withe the Analects Of
Confucious, and the wisdom of Siddhartha. Bush had no reason for war,
therefore his war can be nothing but futile, and he cannot win somthing

on lies, deception, or simply without good intent.

Bush did indeed have his own personal if not contrived reasons for
attacking invading and occupying Iraq. Accounts well before 9/11 show
that he was hell-bent on not only removing Hussein and executing
regime change, but he had the Neo-con PNAC blueprint for the region in
terms of a Western military presence in the region. And of course
that is history, and of course and the saying, 'that the road to
disaster is paved with good intentions,' most certainly applies.

This nation should have known bush had ulterior motive to any battle plan

may concoct. He had Colin Powell at his disposal, and he put him at the
State dept, and placed the senile, crazy old man he plucked out of Serl
Phar. Rummy for the Defense Dept. I mean for God's sake, why didn't that
capture more attention than it did. I swear Tag, when he announced that I
brought it up to people and they did not think it was anything to worry
about. If you have Colin Powell and don't put him in the Penatgon over
rummy, the fish are already stinking up the joint! The DoD was in

hands from day one.

Bush 41 did everything he could to help his boy early on by dredging
up political dinosaurs such as Rumsfeld. And it comes with little to
no wonder why he is in the political quagmire he is in now - I refer
back to my earlier citation involving how former JCS Chairman Myers
was selected over Admiral Clark and that alone showed just how narrow
Rumsfeld's scope and understanding of the military was, even though
served, yet not in an combat, or operational sense of the service. In
fact, his stint in the service resembles the Chimp's time in the
reserves and Guard, but didn't go AWOL and was in fact rated and an
instructor. Needless to say, the DoD is a dynamic political organism
and when managed correctly may be effective in addressing the
threat(s) now confronting the nation - However, and to this point with
Gates is a wait-and-see, and I'm wondering why he hasn't been handed
the baton of "War Czar," and renaming the Dept. of Defense to the
"Department of War" - http://tinyurl.com/ysvvpo and to cut through the
rhetoric and semantic B.S.

--Bush's veto is a veto against the will of We The People Tag. He crossed
the line from president to Dictator the other morning when he told

what we voted for. That is not his right. It is not his job to

our election results to fit his twisted plans in Iraq. When we vote vote

democrats with a clear message, it is not his job to cloud that message
with his madness. However, he did get smacked down when he sent Patreaus

both chambers and he got no results. OUR CONGRESS did not go off message
even for the general. I was proud.

Gen. Petraeus, IMO is a pragmatist - He knows that he is being drawn
into this political mudslinging of which direction to go in Iraq and
doesn't like it one bit - In fact, most senior officers in the
military who are worth their salt would rather do without such
politicking and to simply do the job that they are charged with - He
knows that Bush and this Administration is using him as a tool, and
what he does and says from her on with become history, and a history
that he would prefer not to be associated with if in fact this
completely blows up in this Adminstration's face. Furthermore, it
doesn't help when the Commander-in-Chief looks upon himself as the
King of the country and what 'he says goes,' and feels that he can
scapegoat anyone, at anytime.

Now Tag, you are getting to the real root of the situation, and I'm glad
someone is.

Likewise.

You see bush cannot be succesful. Not now, not at this time. He should

it by now. He has had nothing but one thing after another blow up in his
face since his re-election. His sub standard intellect and his groomed

of ***** kissers will not allow him to see or understand why. One man in

administration knows why, and thats ***** Cheney, but he still insists on
trying to pound the square peg in the round hole, because he, at this

has no choice. But, that old codger has personally manipulated our

for a long time, and is the father of the Military Indiustrial complex,

he knows why it's all going bad, but he still wants to take the money and
run. Cheney is the quintessential Manchurian Candidate. He is the man,
owned by private corpoartions to turn the US into what we are on the

of now. What you said about Bush for all of his faults is true. This
nations, and the world at large will be a better place when he and cheney
are gone.

Absolutely. Cheney is Oz. He's that creepy old unassuming
personfication of all things bad that is happening to this
Administration, if not the country. For Christsakes, he shoots a man
in the face during some fake-***** drunken hunting party and the victim
goes on national television and basically declares, "Thank you, sir.
May I have another?" . . . That is 'power.' And a very evil one at
that.

There is something from Homer I like to think about when I think of the

of 4, Bush. Cheney, Rice and Rummy... "Their glory walks hand in hand

their doom." They are to busy with their glory to see their impending

You certainly know your history, and that which I applaud, but I think
Gandhi put it best . . ." What difference does it make to the dead,
the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought
under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and
democracy?"

The war Czar is very pecurliar move thing for a man like to bush to

He's so consumed with his role as commander, that a Czar could actually

nothing more than a weird bush alter-ego of some sort. I think he just

a fall guy to trot in front of Senate Commitees since American is back to
oversight. He just needs someone to tie to the whipping post, because

sure it wont be him.

Bingo. Have a great weekend.

http://tagheuerblog.blogspot.com/