Pitching For More Dead Americans: A Neo-Con Fetish
The Ward Churchill of the demented right-wing has a deathwish for
terror in order to unite the country
Prison Planet | August 10, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson
Another feverish Neo-Con has come out of the closet and admitted to
enjoying the fetish that he shares with scores of other Administration
apologists - a deathwish for more terror and more dead Americans in
order to unite the country behind Bush.
"ONE MONTH from The Anniversary, I'm thinking another 9/11 would help
America," laments Stu Bykofsky in his Philadelphia Daily News
column .
"Remember the community of outrage and national resolve? America had
not been so united since the first Day of Infamy - 12/7/41.
We knew who the enemy was then.
America's fabric is pulling apart like a cheap sweater.
What would sew us back together?
Another 9/11 attack.
It will take another attack on the homeland to quell the chattering of
chipmunks and to restore America's righteous rage and singular purpose
to prevail."
That's right - we need more terror or the terrorists will win!
Bykofsky is disappointed that 600,000 plus dead civilians along with
thousands of slain troops in Iraq isn't enough to convince Americans
that the war should be prosecuted with more vigor, so he's yearning
for a kick up the backside in the form of thousands of dead Americans
at home.
One could be forgiven for being cynical and thinking that Bykofsky, a
plodding Neo-Con hack who nobody had heard of before last night, was
just pushing the boat out in a desperate ploy to get a link on the
Drudge Report, but reading his previous frenzied Bush administration
boot-licking columns it becomes clear that Bykofsky actually means
it .
Bykofsky screeches about the perils of "global terrorists who use
Islam to justify their hideous sins, including blowing up women and
children," and then invites them to slaughter more Americans - and
even helps pinpoint the targets they should attack!
"The Golden Gate Bridge. Mount Rushmore. Chicago's Wrigley Field. The
Philadelphia subway system," gushes Bykofsky.
Perhaps he should volunteer to send his own kids into those targets as
jumbo jets are slammed into them, since Bykofsky is so eager to
witness more American blood spilled in the name of the empire.
Or is there a greater threat? If Bykofsky has the courage of his
convictions behind him, would he be willing to strap himself with
explosives and run into a crowded shopping mall for the good of the
country?
Obviously not, but only in using such extreme examples as a parallel
can we begin to fathom the vulgarity of Bykofsky's remarks.
Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal
Military College in Kingston, Ontario, recently told the Toronto Star
that "The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist
attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago."
The same sentiment was also explicitly expressed in a 2005 GOP memo ,
which yearned for new attacks that would "validate" the President's
war on terror and "restore his image as a leader of the American
people."
Last month, former Republican Senator Rick Santorum suggested that a
series of "unfortunate events," namely terrorist attacks, will occur
within the next year and change American citizen's perception of the
war.
And the month before that, the new chairman of the Arkansas Republican
Party Dennis Milligan said that there needed to be more attacks on
American soil for President Bush to regain popular approval.
An army of Neo-Cons secretly share the same fetish - they would
exploit a hollow opportunity to say "I told you so," even at the
expense of thousands of dead dads, moms, sons, daughters and babies.
Bykofsky and his cohorts are so aghast that the majority of Americans
now take them for what they are - maniacal devotees to a blood soaked
and failed neo-conservative doctrine - that they'd rather see innocent
people be blown to bits than admit they're wrong.
In some countries, this kind of demented rhetoric is illegal - it's
classified as glorification of terror in Britain, and their rants are
no less volatile than some of the propaganda spewed by Muslim clerics
who have been arrested and deported for advocating violence.
These rabid blowhards should be thankful that America still clings on
to its first amendment - in the face of a terrorist assault that they
encourage - otherwise they would soon find out that openly pitching
for mass murder doesn't sit too well with the authorities.
Bykofsky has just written himself into history as the Ward Churchill
of the delirious right-wing and the two share a lot in common.
Both express the uncanny ability of being able to match the ignorance
of their comments with the depth of their depravity.
http://www.infowars.com/articles/terror/pitching_for_more_dead_americans_neocon_fetish.htm
.
|
