New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not
Involved
http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs20060517_NewDoctoredVideoofPentagonAttackReleaseConfirmsBoeingWasNotInvolved.php
Joe Quinn
Signs of the Times
17/05/2006
It only took four and a half years, but finally the U.S. government has
seen fit to confirm what so many of us have been saying all along -
Pentagon security cameras recorded no evidence of a Boeing 757 hitting
the Pentagon.
The videos comprise the footage from each of the two security cameras
stationed close to each other at one end of the Pentagon. The first
video contains nothing new given that it is simply the footage from
which 5 stills were taken and released in early 2002 by the Pentagon,
the extra footage merely being the scene after the impact. The second
video comprises previously unseen footage from the security camera that
is slightly closer to the impact point. The Pentagon alleges that in
this video the "nose cone" of a plane can be seen in one frame. It
should be noted that the security cameras appear to be the standard
type installed in train stations and airports around the world. Most
people will have seen footage from such cameras showing people walking
in "jumps", which is due to the fact that the camera records a still
image every 2 seconds or so.
Basically then, while the mainstream press is trumpeting the line that
"the Defence Department has released "the video of Flight 77 hitting
the Pentagon", nothing could be further from the truth because there is
still no evidence of a Boeing 757 in the security camera footage. If
mainstream press reporters were to be honest (for once in their lives)
the most they could state would be that: "the DOD has released a video
of the attack on the Pentagon in which something appears in one frame
of the footage and the U.S. government claims that this 'something' is
the nose cone of Flight 77."
Let's take a look at this "nose cone":
http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/images/nose_cone.jpg
This, ladies and gentlemen, is "Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon". This,
is supposed to "finally put to rest" the "conspiracy theory" (backed up
by massive evidence) that Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon. This, is
apparently the best the DOD can do, or is prepared to do, to convince
the world that they are telling the truth about what happened on 9/11.
It doesn't say much for their confidence in their own story, does it.
Below is a zoom of the same "nose cone":
http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/images/nose_cone_zoom.jpg
Is it more clear now? Can you see Flight 77 in all its glory? All we
can see is an amorphous white blob that looks more like a car than the
nose cone of any aircraft. Obviously the images are too grainy to be of
any use to anyone. At this point then, the most we can say is that an
amorphous white blob with definite Islamic terrorists leanings hit the
Pentagon on 9/11.
The above image comprises one frame and 2 seconds (7 and 8) of the
footage, the next and subsequent frames show the explosion, there is
nothing in between, at least not on this camera footage. On the footage
from the second camera, from which the original five stills were cut,
an image of "Flight 77" moving between the right most edge of the
camera angle and the Pentagon facade is visible. Perhaps you remember
it. For old times' sake, let's have a look:
http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/images/smoke_trail.jpg
As you can see, this image, along with the new image of the "nose cone"
appears to back up the idea that it was indeed an amorphous white blob
that hit the Pentagon. Case closed? Well there is still the problem of
where the hell the plane is in the above still. If, as the government
claims, this image shows Flight 77 a few dozen feet from the Pentagon,
we are still left with the question of, "where the hell is the plane!?"
The side of the Pentagon is 971 feet long and the "blob" or smoke trail
in the above image is no more than 750 feet (250yards) from the camera.
Remember the indelible images of those huge planes flying into the
World Trade Center towers? The WTC planes were approximately the same
distance from the observers on the ground as the "blob" in the above
image was from the camera. So why can't we see a large 757 in the above
image?
To sum up: At this stage, absent any new future video from the DOD, the
U.S. government's "evidence" that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon consists
of:
the "nose cone" frame
the white smoke trail or "blob" frame
the explosion at the Pentagon frames.
Convincing stuff, eh? This evidence is all the more suspect given the
fact that the FBI confiscated tapes from at least two other video
cameras in the area that would surely provide a more complete picture,
but they refuse to release them.
The release of the DOD video footage comes at a very interesting time.
Some readers may be aware that the pre-eminent Cannes film festival is
just starting. Fewer however will be aware that the "Pentagon Strike"
Flash animation is being shown at this year's festival. While we are
not paranoid per se, we couldn't help but feel it was a little strange
that the DOD would release their videos on the very day that our team
set off to Cannes to promote the Pentagon strike flash. If we were
"paranoid", we might say that the release of these videos is an attempt
at pre-emptive damage control over potential exposure at Cannes. Of
course, it will also simply help to raise the profile of all things
'Pentagonian', which can only help our team in Cannes.
A word on the response from alternative new pundits and 9/11
researchers about the new videos: Most appear to agree that there is
nothing new in the videos that in any way discredits the sound
allegations that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. A few notable
editorialists however are attempting to revive the dead horse that is
the claim that the "no Boeing at the pentagon" theory is one big
government-sponsored Psyops. The theory goes that government spooks are
deliberately fuelling the "no Boeing" theories in an attempt to draw in
as many researchers as possible - a honey trap for conspiracy theorists
if you will - and then, when enough have been lured in, destroy their
reputations by releasing a definitive video that shows clearly that
Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
While possible, in a remote sort of way, I seriously doubt that if the
U.S. government has had access to a tape for four and a half years that
could prove categorically that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, that they
would have put up with so much rabble rousing from the "fringe" rather
than simply quashing their claims from the outset. The simple truth is
that the U.S. government has NO recourse to any evidence that can
disprove the claims of serious 9/11 researchers because no such
evidence exists.
Serious 9/11 researchers claim that a section of the U.S. government
and military helped to orchestrate the 9/11 attacks, that the WTC
towers were deliberately demolished, and that Flight 77 was very
obviously not the plane that hit the Pentagon. The U.S government, and
the agencies that are tasked with preserving its hold on power, have
been actively running interference over the threat of exposure of the
truth about 9/11 by the alternative media for the past four years.
The decades-old tactic of the CIA's Counter Intelligence Programs where
their agents infiltrate "movements" in an attempt to sow discord from
within is a major part of this "running interference". It is noticeable
therefore that the only area of discord among 9/11 "truth seekers" is
the Pentagon attack and whether or not Flight 77 was involved. Let me
put it bluntly: The success of government Psyops on 9/11 is measured
not by how many people can be made to believe the "no Boeing at the
Pentagon" claim but rather by how many 9/11 researchers can be
convinced that the "no Boeing at the Pentagon" claim is a government
Psyop and should be avoided.
The attack on the Pentagon is the real Achilles heel of the official
9/11 story.
Let me explain:
Even in the event that evidence for the obvious controlled demolition
of the WTC towers were to be publicly revealed and accepted, the U.S
government could plausibly claim that 'al-Qaeda' somehow managed to
plant explosives in the buildings, that this evidence had somehow been
overlooked due to "incompetence" in the 9/11 investigation. The
incompetence angle could be used, as it has been already, as a
plausible explanation for many other areas that would ordinarily point
to government complicity. The Pentagon attack, however, is a very
different matter. If it were ever to be publicly revealed that it was
not Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon, there is simply no way that the
U.S government continue to claim that "al-Qaeda did it" or lie its way
out of it, because they would have to explain what happened to Flight
77 and its passengers. It is for this reason that the "no Boeing at the
Pentagon" theory has been thoroughly attacked and maligned by
government shills and many alleged 9/11 investigators.
The Pentagon attack holds the key to the entire 9/11 mystery, it
presents the best opportunity to blow the lid completely off the entire
sordid deal and reveal the very, very disturbing reality of the nature
of the U.S. government and that other Middle Eastern agency and the
roles they both played in wantonly murdering almost 3,000 American
citizens on September 11th 2001.
.
|
