| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Abel Malcolm" |
| Date: |
09 Oct 2005 01:27:07 AM |
| Object: |
New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
The Bush Republicans have been so horribly wrongheaded to hand out all
those huge tax cuts of theirs, most of which have gone to the richest
1% of Americans only (the very consituency that contributes to Bush's
campaign), add that mistake to that other horribly wrongheaded mistake
of theirs, the wasting of some $7 billion per month on that completely
unnecessary and illegal/immoral war in Iraq, this is why the Repugs
have just out and out neglected all the vital and necessary spending on
our domestic and infrastructure needs.
It would have cost less than $100 million to fix and upgrade the levee
system in New Orleans, which the Democrats wanted to spend, but the
Republicans opposed. Less than a $100 million, and the entire post
Katrina flood disaster would have been averted, saving us the hundreds
of billions of dollars we will be spending now to clean up that mess.
It is also worth noting that only 2 years ago we had the worst power
outages in U.S. history, where millions of Americans experienced power
blackouts in much of New York, Ohio and other parts of the Northeast.
That problem, to put in a nutshell, and former Energy Secretary Bill
Richardson described it best, "We're the world's greatest superpower,
but we have a 3rd world electricity grid".
We NEED to bring our power grids back to the 21st century. We need to
modernize our grids, but to do that, we will have to set up a national
"rules of the road" on governing and managing and providing better
access to the nation's transmission system. Presently, we have a
strange patchwork of utility companies, and they use the electric lines
in the same way that truckers use highways, they thus have no interest
in upgrading the grids, no more than truckers have an interest in
fixing potholes on the highway. So you better believe that it's the
role of the federal government to either build up or to help set up the
financial incentives for these utility companies to build the new
transmission lines.
Here's what all the experts agree on, our entire electric system is
being overworked, and it needs to be upgraded. Due to the
Republicans' gross neglect and mismanagement of our domestic needs, we
are falling way behind the rest of the world, such as Japan, for
example, where they are utilizing state of the art fiber optic
technology, whose wires are much thinner than the unsightly, bulky and
unstable electric wires that we see overhead in our cities, and the
fiber optic cable wires are safely tucked, built underground, where
they carry electricty and telephone and television/internet cable
connections, e.t.c., all of this carried in one very thin but sturdy
wire. This is the latest technology, we should be investing in it.
What our government has been "investing" in instead (as per the
Republicans), is that our tax dollars have been used to deliberately
reward corporations that eliminate American jobs. This is exactly
what Bush's father did with our tax dollars until
Clinton ended the practice when he was elected in 1992. Bush jr. has
now gone right back to the same old failed policies of past Republican
presidents, he's using our tax dollars once again to reward the
corporations that relocate overseas.
This "pro-corporation" and "anti-worker" policy of Bush's father was
promptly re-instated when Bush jr. stole the 2000 election, and it
continues unabated to this day. As a result, we are losing jobs every
day. Millions of jobs are lost each year, especially those high paying
manufacturing jobs. And the automobile industry is just one such
example of how our businesses used to utilize the most advanced
technology and employed the most highly educated workforce. But now,
unfortunately, because of Republican policies, these corporations are
going overseas instead, leaving our citizens screwed up and in the
lurk. The latest news has it that GM's sales are down about 5% from
last year's, and Ford's sales are down by about 2%. Toyota, on the
other hand, has had it's best recorded U.S. sales ever seen in its
history, increasing by more than 25% from last year's, due in large
part because sales of their Prius hybrid fuel efficient vehicle are up,
way up, by 208% from last year's. Hybrid vehicles get double the gas
mileage of regular gas powered vehicles, and they are a great deal less
polluting, see:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/hybrid-car1.htm
Imagine that. And Bush campaigned against Al Gore, in 2000, actually
telling the American people that our country will lose jobs if we pay
attention to the environment. Al Gore said that this is a "false
choice" for Bush to say that we have to choose between jobs and the
environment. Al Gore kept insisting that pollution free technology
will in itself create jobs that the world is in desperate demand for.
But Bush, and his Republican cohorts, along with this right-winged
corporate controlled media of ours, kept arguing that we will lose jobs
if we vote for the environmentally conscience Democrats.
Let's face it, not only our electric grid system, but also our railroad
and public transportation technology is just as much on a par with the
3rd world as well. Compare our public transport system, our slow,
inefficient and noisy train system to Britain's, Germany's or Japan's,
and you too will agree with me, our public transport system is horribly
backwards. Take a vacation, go overseas, and see how far our nation is
lagging behind these other countries.
And let's talk about education spending too, because even as the rest
of the world, such as Ireland's government and Japan's government, for
instance, they have been steadily increasing funding for education and
schools, which have churned out the latest automobile engineers, but
the U.S. government, under George Bush's tutelage has actually been
cutting funding for education. Compare the results.
While the U.S. automobile industry and many other industries have been
miserably declining, the U.S. oil industry, in marked contrast, has
been making record high profits, profits that have been going thru the
high stratosphere. They are making so much money that they don't even
know what to do with their money. Here's an idea, why don't they build
more refineries? But then, if they do, it will increase supply and
then lower the price of gas, thus reducing their profits, and they
don't want that to happen.
We have oil companies sitting on unused refineries, deliberately so,
completely closed down, while they pretend that they want to sell it to
other oil companies. It's that same old Enron tactic where they
deliberately are creating a shortage.
It was a little more than 5 years ago that the energy companies (which
have very close ties to George Bush and the Republicans), led by Enron,
had deliberately created an energy shortage here in California,
resulting in record high energy prices. California
suffered greatly, while Republicans all over the country laughed at our
misfortune. Now the oil companies (who have very close ties to George
Bush and the Republicans) are doing the same exact thing to the rest of
the country that Enron did to California back in 2000/2001.
There should be an investigation to determine whether the current
energy shortage that has led to record high gas prices is a real
shortage or is the result of deliberate market manipulations. But then
you better believe that this investigation will never be done while the
Republicans are in power, because they now control all branches of our
government. And then ALL the oil companies, each and every single one
of them, all of them donate to the Republican party. So the
Republicans will never allow such an investigation.
We NEED a new energy policy. But not one concocted by the oil
industry, as we have now. Here's just one example of how things could
change, the Clinton administration, for example, he ordered sharp
increases in the efficiency of air-conditioners, and this worked out
very well, because air-conditioners are a major demand on peak load
days. But when Bush became President in 2001, just to placate the
energy industry that financed his campaign, Bush immediately retracted
and eliminated Clinton's call for increased a/c efficiency.
A good national energy policy would do 3 very basic things:
#1. Curb demand & implement energy conservation policies
#2. Modernize transmission, and
#3. Encourage new, nonpolluting power sources.
Let's stop wasting that $7 billion per month on the useless Iraq war
and we'll have more than enough money to do all the things that I've
mentioned here.
While I'm at it, let me repost this, it as a perfect example of why we
need to upgrade our nation's infrastructure needs. I posted this last
week, but no one responded to it. So I'll keep re-posting it until
someone responds.
Four years ago, on 9/11/01, hundreds of New York city Firefighters died
in the World Trade Center, because their radio freqencies were not
callibrated to pick up the same radio frequency that the New York city
Police department used. So when the New York city Police, flying in
helicopters clearly saw the twin buildings were near collapse they
tried to warn the firefighters, but the firefighters could not hear
them. The independent and bipartisan 9/11 Commission (whose creation
the Republicans opposed) discovered this, and they emphasized it in the
strongest possible terms that this unorganized communications system
needs to be upgraded. But unfortunately, and we have seen this in the
Katrina disaster, that the 9/11 Commission's reccomendations were
completely ignored. In the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, we found
out that all the radio communications systems of the First Responders
was just as unorganized and failing as it was in 9/11/01 when we lost
hundreds of firemen there.
Fixing the radio communications systems of First Responders, so that
they have the ability to instantly communicate with each other does not
even require that much money, and it would be money very well spent
too. What is required, for the most part, is that all the
communications systems be looked into and organized in a way that
allows all the different departments to communicate with each other.
This should be our first and most immediate concern, to upgrade the
patchwork of emergency communications systems across the country,
because effective and realiable communication is the most basic
lynchpin of any emergency system. This mammoth problem should be fixed
by the federal level, it is the Bush administration that should get
involved here. No one else can solve this problem, as it is, local
officials are very reluctant to give up authority on their own to buy
their own little customized systems.
An independent/bipartisan Katrina commission would undoubtedly expose
this same exact problem, if and when, or if ever we get such a
commission created to study the government's handling of the Katrina
disaster.
Abel Malcolm
THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Educate yourself & go to these links:
http://www.moveon.org & http://www.humanity.org &
http://ww11.e-tractions.com/truemajority/run/oreo &
www.democracynow.org
& http://alternet.org/ & http://www.huffingtonpost.com &
http://thinkprogress.org/
.
|
|
| User: "George.com" |
|
| Title: Re: New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
09 Oct 2005 04:37:12 AM |
|
|
"Abel Malcolm" <AbelMalcolm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128839227.062228.252350@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The Bush Republicans have been so horribly wrongheaded to hand out all
those huge tax cuts of theirs, most of which have gone to the richest
1% of Americans only (the very consituency that contributes to Bush's
campaign), add that mistake to that other horribly wrongheaded mistake
of theirs, the wasting of some $7 billion per month on that completely
unnecessary and illegal/immoral war in Iraq, this is why the Repugs
have just out and out neglected all the vital and necessary spending on
our domestic and infrastructure needs.
It would have cost less than $100 million to fix and upgrade the levee
system in New Orleans, which the Democrats wanted to spend, but the
Republicans opposed. Less than a $100 million, and the entire post
Katrina flood disaster would have been averted, saving us the hundreds
of billions of dollars we will be spending now to clean up that mess.
It is also worth noting that only 2 years ago we had the worst power
outages in U.S. history, where millions of Americans experienced power
blackouts in much of New York, Ohio and other parts of the Northeast.
That problem, to put in a nutshell, and former Energy Secretary Bill
Richardson described it best, "We're the world's greatest superpower,
but we have a 3rd world electricity grid".
We NEED to bring our power grids back to the 21st century. We need to
modernize our grids, but to do that, we will have to set up a national
"rules of the road" on governing and managing and providing better
access to the nation's transmission system. Presently, we have a
strange patchwork of utility companies, and they use the electric lines
in the same way that truckers use highways, they thus have no interest
in upgrading the grids, no more than truckers have an interest in
fixing potholes on the highway. So you better believe that it's the
role of the federal government to either build up or to help set up the
financial incentives for these utility companies to build the new
transmission lines.
Here's what all the experts agree on, our entire electric system is
being overworked, and it needs to be upgraded. Due to the
Republicans' gross neglect and mismanagement of our domestic needs, we
are falling way behind the rest of the world, such as Japan, for
example, where they are utilizing state of the art fiber optic
technology, whose wires are much thinner than the unsightly, bulky and
unstable electric wires that we see overhead in our cities, and the
fiber optic cable wires are safely tucked, built underground, where
they carry electricty and telephone and television/internet cable
connections, e.t.c., all of this carried in one very thin but sturdy
wire. This is the latest technology, we should be investing in it.
Don't be surprised. The economic perverts (National party) who were in power
in New Zealand from 1990 to 1999 spent SFA on our infrastructure. They did
however find enough money to pass tax cuts. The social democratic government
in place now (Labour) has spent billions resurrecting our power, roads,
rail, hospitals. They have implemented a range of clean air and water
policies, signed Kyoto and planned phased introduction of bio-fuels. The
opposition National party want to pull out of Kyoto as the US and Australia
have not signed up to it. Good old head in the sand ***** from the right
wing economic perverts.
rob
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
09 Oct 2005 10:32:10 AM |
|
|
"George.com" <roblyn@ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
news:diaoa2$gri$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
"Abel Malcolm" <AbelMalcolm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128839227.062228.252350@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The Bush Republicans have been so horribly wrongheaded to hand out all
those huge tax cuts of theirs, most of which have gone to the richest
1% of Americans only (the very consituency that contributes to Bush's
campaign), add that mistake to that other horribly wrongheaded mistake
of theirs, the wasting of some $7 billion per month on that completely
unnecessary and illegal/immoral war in Iraq, this is why the Repugs
have just out and out neglected all the vital and necessary spending on
our domestic and infrastructure needs.
It would have cost less than $100 million to fix and upgrade the levee
system in New Orleans, which the Democrats wanted to spend, but the
Republicans opposed. Less than a $100 million, and the entire post
Katrina flood disaster would have been averted, saving us the hundreds
of billions of dollars we will be spending now to clean up that mess.
If the corrupt bozos of the local governments hadn't spent the levee money
on airplanes, and casinos, perhaps the levees would not have failed.
Giving fed money to a pack of corrupt dem local hicks is never effective.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Boy" |
|
| Title: Re: New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
09 Oct 2005 04:31:13 PM |
|
|
"Abel Malcolm" <AbelMalcolm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128839227.062228.252350@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The Bush Republicans have been so horribly wrongheaded to hand out all
those huge tax cuts of theirs, most of which have gone to the richest
1% of Americans only (the very consituency that contributes to Bush's
campaign), add that mistake to that other horribly wrongheaded mistake
of theirs, the wasting of some $7 billion per month on that completely
unnecessary and illegal/immoral war in Iraq, this is why the Repugs
have just out and out neglected all the vital and necessary spending on
our domestic and infrastructure needs.
It would have cost less than $100 million to fix and upgrade the levee
system in New Orleans, which the Democrats wanted to spend, but the
Republicans opposed. Less than a $100 million, and the entire post
Katrina flood disaster would have been averted, saving us the hundreds
of billions of dollars we will be spending now to clean up that mess.
And if they would of started 20 years ago they would not have been finished
with the upgrade to the levee system in New Orleans in time for Katrina.
They could not upgrade the levee system because of the court injunctions
through the years by tree huggers.
It is also worth noting that only 2 years ago we had the worst power
outages in U.S. history, where millions of Americans experienced power
blackouts in much of New York, Ohio and other parts of the Northeast.
That problem, to put in a nutshell, and former Energy Secretary Bill
Richardson described it best, "We're the world's greatest superpower,
but we have a 3rd world electricity grid".
States like California would not allow new power plants to be built. If you
do not build most plant to keep up with the demand you will have outages.
We NEED to bring our power grids back to the 21st century. We need to
modernize our grids, but to do that, we will have to set up a national
"rules of the road" on governing and managing and providing better
access to the nation's transmission system. Presently, we have a
strange patchwork of utility companies, and they use the electric lines
in the same way that truckers use highways, they thus have no interest
in upgrading the grids, no more than truckers have an interest in
fixing potholes on the highway. So you better believe that it's the
role of the federal government to either build up or to help set up the
financial incentives for these utility companies to build the new
transmission lines.
You want to give tax breaks to those big corporations? I thought you have
posted that there should be no tax breaks for the rich? What gives?
Here's what all the experts agree on, our entire electric system is
being overworked, and it needs to be upgraded. Due to the
Republicans' gross neglect and mismanagement of our domestic needs, we
are falling way behind the rest of the world, such as Japan, for
example, where they are utilizing state of the art fiber optic
technology, whose wires are much thinner than the unsightly, bulky and
unstable electric wires that we see overhead in our cities, and the
fiber optic cable wires are safely tucked, built underground, where
they carry electricty and telephone and television/internet cable
connections, e.t.c., all of this carried in one very thin but sturdy
wire. This is the latest technology, we should be investing in it.
Fiber optic lines do not carry electrical power, they transmit light
signals. I feel that you may of mistaken fiber optic lines for
superconductor lines. Superconductor lines can conduct huge amounts of power
in a small line.
It wasn't the republicans that stopped investing into the research of
superconductors. The US was the leader in superconductor research until
Clinton in his first year in office cut funding for it. Just south of Dallas
Texas there is a supercollider that was shut down by Clinton. All
superconductor research was stopped in the US and now we are very far behind
in this technology.
What our government has been "investing" in instead (as per the
Republicans), is that our tax dollars have been used to deliberately
reward corporations that eliminate American jobs.
How? Bush Sr. did sign NAFTA that did move some jobs to Mexico, but no tax
dollars were used and there are still import tax charged to items coming
from Mexico. Clinton signed China as most faverat trading partner. Doing
this made it so that items coming from China were not taxed and that not
olny shut down many factories in the US but also many that had moved to
Mexico.
This is exactly
what Bush's father did with our tax dollars until
Clinton ended the practice when he was elected in 1992. Bush jr. has
now gone right back to the same old failed policies of past Republican
presidents, he's using our tax dollars once again to reward the
corporations that relocate overseas.
Lets take a company that has moved out of the US. Kerry owns Heinz and has
moved it completely out of the US. What US tax dollars were used to help
Kerry move his companies out of the country?
Ø This "pro-corporation" and "anti-worker" policy of Bush's father was
promptly re-instated when Bush jr. stole the 2000 election, and it
continues unabated to this day. As a result, we are losing jobs every
day. Millions of jobs are lost each year, especially those high paying
manufacturing jobs. And the automobile industry is just one such
example of how our businesses used to utilize the most advanced
technology and employed the most highly educated workforce. But now,
unfortunately, because of Republican policies, these corporations are
going overseas instead, leaving our citizens screwed up and in the
lurk.
I hate to tell you, but these jobs had been going overseas for just a few
more years than the Bushes had been on the Whitehouse. This trend started
when I was a child. As companies were forced to comply with environmental
laws they started going to countries that had no laws. I remember hearing
the adults talking about this in the 60's.
Ø The latest news has it that GM's sales are down about 5% from
last year's, and Ford's sales are down by about 2%. Toyota, on the
other hand, has had it's best recorded U.S. sales ever seen in its
history, increasing by more than 25% from last year's, due in large
part because sales of their Prius hybrid fuel efficient vehicle are up,
way up, by 208% from last year's. Hybrid vehicles get double the gas
mileage of regular gas powered vehicles, and they are a great deal less
polluting, see:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/hybrid-car1.htm
Imagine that. And Bush campaigned against Al Gore, in 2000, actually
telling the American people that our country will lose jobs if we pay
attention to the environment. Al Gore said that this is a "false
choice" for Bush to say that we have to choose between jobs and the
environment. Al Gore kept insisting that pollution free technology
will in itself create jobs that the world is in desperate demand for.
But Bush, and his Republican cohorts, along with this right-winged
corporate controlled media of ours, kept arguing that we will lose jobs
if we vote for the environmentally conscience Democrats.
People are not buying the hybrid cars because of the environment, they are
buying them because gasoline is $3 a gallon.
Ø
Let's face it, not only our electric grid system, but also our railroad
and public transportation technology is just as much on a par with the
3rd world as well. Compare our public transport system, our slow,
inefficient and noisy train system to Britain's, Germany's or Japan's,
and you too will agree with me, our public transport system is horribly
backwards. Take a vacation, go overseas, and see how far our nation is
lagging behind these other countries.
Ø
In the US we have been in a love affair with the automobile. We like our
freedom that the public transportation system in the US does not give us and
has not had to give us.
Ø
And let's talk about education spending too, because even as the rest
of the world, such as Ireland's government and Japan's government, for
instance, they have been steadily increasing funding for education and
schools, which have churned out the latest automobile engineers, but
the U.S. government, under George Bush's tutelage has actually been
cutting funding for education. Compare the results.
Ø
That funny, the last report I saw said that Bush has spent more on public
education than any other president. I seem to remember you making a post
about how much Bush has spent on education and all it has to show for it is
a test.
Ø
While the U.S. automobile industry and many other industries have been
miserably declining, the U.S. oil industry, in marked contrast, has
been making record high profits, profits that have been going thru the
high stratosphere. They are making so much money that they don't even
know what to do with their money. Here's an idea, why don't they build
more refineries? But then, if they do, it will increase supply and
then lower the price of gas, thus reducing their profits, and they
don't want that to happen.
Ø
The record profits that you talk about are due to China buying massive
amounts of oil causing the price of crude oil to go up. There are two things
that set the price of gasoline, the price of crude oil and supply and
demand. If they were to build more refineries in the US under current
regulations, I have been told that to make any money they would have to
charge the prices they are now charging with the price of crude oil back
down to $10 a barrel.
Ø
We have oil companies sitting on unused refineries, deliberately so,
completely closed down, while they pretend that they want to sell it to
other oil companies. It's that same old Enron tactic where they
deliberately are creating a shortage.
The ones that are closed down need repairs that would force the oil
companies to loose their grandfathered rights and updates would cause them
to have to comply with environmental laws that would cause them not to make
money.
Ø
It was a little more than 5 years ago that the energy companies (which
have very close ties to George Bush and the Republicans), led by Enron,
had deliberately created an energy shortage here in California,
resulting in record high energy prices.
Ø
California suffered because they make it unreasonable to build power plants
and California get the outages that it deserves.
Ø California
suffered greatly, while Republicans all over the country laughed at our
misfortune. Now the oil companies (who have very close ties to George
Bush and the Republicans) are doing the same exact thing to the rest of
the country that Enron did to California back in 2000/2001.
There should be an investigation to determine whether the current
energy shortage that has led to record high gas prices is a real
shortage or is the result of deliberate market manipulations. But then
you better believe that this investigation will never be done while the
Republicans are in power, because they now control all branches of our
government. And then ALL the oil companies, each and every single one
of them, all of them donate to the Republican party. So the
Republicans will never allow such an investigation.
We NEED a new energy policy. But not one concocted by the oil
industry, as we have now. Here's just one example of how things could
change, the Clinton administration, for example, he ordered sharp
increases in the efficiency of air-conditioners, and this worked out
very well, because air-conditioners are a major demand on peak load
days. But when Bush became President in 2001, just to placate the
energy industry that financed his campaign, Bush immediately retracted
and eliminated Clinton's call for increased a/c efficiency.
Why do we need a law to do this? If you and others were stead fast in your
beliefs you would not buy the air conditioners that have a high energy use
and only buy the ones that are low energy. You just want a law to control
others. This is why California is so bad off. They pass laws to control
others and when the others move out the ones that are left cry because there
is no power or jobs.
Ø
A good national energy policy would do 3 very basic things:
#1. Curb demand & implement energy conservation policies
#2. Modernize transmission, and
#3. Encourage new, nonpolluting power sources.
Let's stop wasting that $7 billion per month on the useless Iraq war
and we'll have more than enough money to do all the things that I've
mentioned here.
While I'm at it, let me repost this, it as a perfect example of why we
need to upgrade our nation's infrastructure needs. I posted this last
week, but no one responded to it. So I'll keep re-posting it until
someone responds.
Four years ago, on 9/11/01, hundreds of New York city Firefighters died
in the World Trade Center, because their radio freqencies were not
callibrated to pick up the same radio frequency that the New York city
Police department used. So when the New York city Police, flying in
helicopters clearly saw the twin buildings were near collapse they
tried to warn the firefighters, but the firefighters could not hear
them. The independent and bipartisan 9/11 Commission (whose creation
the Republicans opposed) discovered this, and they emphasized it in the
strongest possible terms that this unorganized communications system
needs to be upgraded. But unfortunately, and we have seen this in the
Katrina disaster, that the 9/11 Commission's reccomendations were
completely ignored. In the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, we found
out that all the radio communications systems of the First Responders
was just as unorganized and failing as it was in 9/11/01 when we lost
hundreds of firemen there.
You seem to not know anything about how the world works. The federal
government has no control over what radios or haw many frequencies a state
or city government uses.
Ø
Fixing the radio communications systems of First Responders, so that
they have the ability to instantly communicate with each other does not
even require that much money, and it would be money very well spent
too. What is required, for the most part, is that all the
communications systems be looked into and organized in a way that
allows all the different departments to communicate with each other.
This should be our first and most immediate concern, to upgrade the
patchwork of emergency communications systems across the country,
because effective and realiable communication is the most basic
lynchpin of any emergency system. This mammoth problem should be fixed
by the federal level, it is the Bush administration that should get
involved here. No one else can solve this problem, as it is, local
officials are very reluctant to give up authority on their own to buy
their own little customized systems.
An independent/bipartisan Katrina commission would undoubtedly expose
this same exact problem, if and when, or if ever we get such a
commission created to study the government's handling of the Katrina
disaster.
We do not live in Russia; we live in the United States. This is a group of
states that chose to bond together for the common good for all states. Each
state is sovereign to is own laws and how it governs its self as long as it
follows the constitution of the Untied States which was agreed when the
state joined the United States. The federal government has no right to tell
a state how it must be run as long as it is following the US constitution.
Therefore the federal government can not tell any state what equipment they
must have for their police of fire fighters.
Have you graduated high school? This is taught in the 11th and 12th grades.
Ø
Ø > Abel Malcolm
THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
| User: "rachel dafny" |
|
| Title: Re: New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
10 Oct 2005 12:18:20 AM |
|
|
President Al Gore here. I'm the inventor of the Internet, Photoshop,
and the Ionic Breeze.
Today for the first time in 20 years I walked into a supermarket. It
was a big step for me, but I was sick of the crap the secret service
jocks kept buying for me. I asked for a Sleepytime Herbal Chamomile Tea
Infuser and they bring me back Lipton Green Tea! Hornswaggled!
The Official Blog of President Al Gore:
http://NewsoftheDay.com/algore
http://NewsoftheDay.com/algore
http://NewsoftheDay.com/algore
PEOPLE, I MADE THE INTERNET AND I CAN SHUT IT OFF. NO POTTY TALK.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PagCal" |
|
| Title: Re: New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
09 Oct 2005 05:04:32 AM |
|
|
Aparently, Flex-Fuel cars are a big hit in Brazil. They can run on 100%
bio-alcohol as well as gasoline. The kicker is the alcohol is 1/2 the
price of gas.
Why don't we see this sort of inovation in America?
---
Accents
Dual Fuel Cars Revive Brazil's Alcohol Industry
By Mario Osava*
The new "bi-fuel" vehicles could expand the use of renewable energy,
which had been on the decline in the late 1990s.
RIO DE JANEIRO - Brazil's automotive industry, which had made advances
in using fuel alcohol as a means to confront the oil crisis of the
1970s, is taking another step, manufacturing cars that run on gasoline,
alcohol or a mix of the two -- and maintaining the same level of vehicle
performance.
The car manufacturers Volkswagen, of German origins, and the U.S.-based
General Motors put the first dual fuel vehicles on the market here in
April and June, respectively. The technogical innovation is a result of
Brazilian industry, although the two companies are transnationals.
The result benefits the environment, because reducing gasoline
consumption and increasing alcohol use means lower emissions of carbon
dioxide, a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming, Manoel
Paulo de Toledo, engineering and inspection manager for the Sao Paulo
state technology and environment entity CETESB, told Tierramérica.
Substituting a fossil fuel with a plant-based renewable fuel "is the
correct route to take," especially for curbing climate change, agrees
Eduardo quartim, project coordinator at the Ecoar Institute, a Sao Paulo
environmental group.
Furthermore, explained CETESB's Toledo, alcohol production creates
economic and social benefits for Brazil because it "generates employment
and gives the rural population a reason to stay."
Sugar cane, the raw material for alcohol, absorbs as much or more carbon
dioxide than what is emitted by alcohol comubstion. And sugar cane
byproducts, like the pulp and sediments, are used to generate
electricity and as fertliser.
The bi-fuel automobile increases Brazil's opportunities to export
vehicles, alcohol and automotive technology. Several countries,
including the United States, China and Canada, already consume gasoline
with alcohol added.
There are nearly two million "flex fuel" cars in the United States, but
there the process "is different because they use a mix with a maximum of
85 percent alcohol," which obligates adding 15 percent gasoline, noted
Joao Alvarez Filho, Volkswagen manager for engines and transmission.
The new Brazilian models can run on just gasoline, or 100 percent
alcohol, or any proportion mix of the two, he said in a coversation with
Tierramérica. The company prefers to call this innovation "total flex",
to reflect the true range of possibilities.
The Brazilian advantage was to develop the dual fuel-based on cars that
run exclusively on alcohol, which the country has produced for more than
25 years, a pioneer in the technology.
As of July, 6,100 of these new cars had been sold, and buyer
satisfaction is high, but it is too early to predict just how far the
market for total flex vehicles will go. Some experts believe that in the
long term all Brazilian cars will be bi-fuel. Another possibility is
that the dual fuel will "kill" the alcohol-only engine.
Volkswagen began to develop the new cars four years ago, with the sole
objective of "allowing users complete freedom in choosing fuels," said
Alvarez.
But the new car is also a response to drivers' worries about alcohol
supplies. Alcohol-fuelled cars conquered the Brazilian market in the
1980s, and represented more than 90 percent of car manufacturing within
a few years. Cheap alcohol and expensive gasoline pushed this trend.
But alcohol shortages in 1989 and 1990 sharply undermined the popularity
of the new fuel. Sales of alcohol-powered cars plummeted to less than
one percent of total vehicle sales.
Also contributing to the decline was the fact that oil prices fell, and
that the state-owned oil giant Petrobrás, a monopoly at the time, wanted
to sell within Brazil the fuel that it was exporting at a loss, says
Alfred Szwarc, technical consultant for the Sugar Cane Agro-Industry
Union, an organisation of Brazil's major sugar and alcohol producers.
Now the bi-fuel car has emerged because petroleum prices have gone up
again, with the international price at 25 to 30 dollars a barrel, more
than twice what was 13 or 14 years ago, Szwarc noted in a conversation
with Tierramérica.
The fact that dual fuel vehicles are on the market is helping consumers
get past their hesitations about alcohol-only motors. Drivers are no
longer subject to shortages or high prices of one fuel or the other,
because they can always use the cheaper one.
As for the environmental benefits, for now there are no major
differences in Brazil in the level of contaminants -- carbon dioxide,
hydrocarbons or nitrogen oxide -- produced by alcohol and
gasoline-driven cars, according to Toledo.
Alcohol generates more aldehydes, carcinogenic substances, but gasoline
produces "innumerable substances that are at least as toxic" as
aldehydes, he said.
* Mario Osava is an IPS correspondent.
Abel Malcolm wrote:
The Bush Republicans have been so horribly wrongheaded to hand out all
those huge tax cuts of theirs, most of which have gone to the richest
1% of Americans only (the very consituency that contributes to Bush's
campaign), add that mistake to that other horribly wrongheaded mistake
of theirs, the wasting of some $7 billion per month on that completely
unnecessary and illegal/immoral war in Iraq, this is why the Repugs
have just out and out neglected all the vital and necessary spending on
our domestic and infrastructure needs.
It would have cost less than $100 million to fix and upgrade the levee
system in New Orleans, which the Democrats wanted to spend, but the
Republicans opposed. Less than a $100 million, and the entire post
Katrina flood disaster would have been averted, saving us the hundreds
of billions of dollars we will be spending now to clean up that mess.
It is also worth noting that only 2 years ago we had the worst power
outages in U.S. history, where millions of Americans experienced power
blackouts in much of New York, Ohio and other parts of the Northeast.
That problem, to put in a nutshell, and former Energy Secretary Bill
Richardson described it best, "We're the world's greatest superpower,
but we have a 3rd world electricity grid".
We NEED to bring our power grids back to the 21st century. We need to
modernize our grids, but to do that, we will have to set up a national
"rules of the road" on governing and managing and providing better
access to the nation's transmission system. Presently, we have a
strange patchwork of utility companies, and they use the electric lines
in the same way that truckers use highways, they thus have no interest
in upgrading the grids, no more than truckers have an interest in
fixing potholes on the highway. So you better believe that it's the
role of the federal government to either build up or to help set up the
financial incentives for these utility companies to build the new
transmission lines.
Here's what all the experts agree on, our entire electric system is
being overworked, and it needs to be upgraded. Due to the
Republicans' gross neglect and mismanagement of our domestic needs, we
are falling way behind the rest of the world, such as Japan, for
example, where they are utilizing state of the art fiber optic
technology, whose wires are much thinner than the unsightly, bulky and
unstable electric wires that we see overhead in our cities, and the
fiber optic cable wires are safely tucked, built underground, where
they carry electricty and telephone and television/internet cable
connections, e.t.c., all of this carried in one very thin but sturdy
wire. This is the latest technology, we should be investing in it.
What our government has been "investing" in instead (as per the
Republicans), is that our tax dollars have been used to deliberately
reward corporations that eliminate American jobs. This is exactly
what Bush's father did with our tax dollars until
Clinton ended the practice when he was elected in 1992. Bush jr. has
now gone right back to the same old failed policies of past Republican
presidents, he's using our tax dollars once again to reward the
corporations that relocate overseas.
This "pro-corporation" and "anti-worker" policy of Bush's father was
promptly re-instated when Bush jr. stole the 2000 election, and it
continues unabated to this day. As a result, we are losing jobs every
day. Millions of jobs are lost each year, especially those high paying
manufacturing jobs. And the automobile industry is just one such
example of how our businesses used to utilize the most advanced
technology and employed the most highly educated workforce. But now,
unfortunately, because of Republican policies, these corporations are
going overseas instead, leaving our citizens screwed up and in the
lurk. The latest news has it that GM's sales are down about 5% from
last year's, and Ford's sales are down by about 2%. Toyota, on the
other hand, has had it's best recorded U.S. sales ever seen in its
history, increasing by more than 25% from last year's, due in large
part because sales of their Prius hybrid fuel efficient vehicle are up,
way up, by 208% from last year's. Hybrid vehicles get double the gas
mileage of regular gas powered vehicles, and they are a great deal less
polluting, see:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/hybrid-car1.htm
Imagine that. And Bush campaigned against Al Gore, in 2000, actually
telling the American people that our country will lose jobs if we pay
attention to the environment. Al Gore said that this is a "false
choice" for Bush to say that we have to choose between jobs and the
environment. Al Gore kept insisting that pollution free technology
will in itself create jobs that the world is in desperate demand for.
But Bush, and his Republican cohorts, along with this right-winged
corporate controlled media of ours, kept arguing that we will lose jobs
if we vote for the environmentally conscience Democrats.
Let's face it, not only our electric grid system, but also our railroad
and public transportation technology is just as much on a par with the
3rd world as well. Compare our public transport system, our slow,
inefficient and noisy train system to Britain's, Germany's or Japan's,
and you too will agree with me, our public transport system is horribly
backwards. Take a vacation, go overseas, and see how far our nation is
lagging behind these other countries.
And let's talk about education spending too, because even as the rest
of the world, such as Ireland's government and Japan's government, for
instance, they have been steadily increasing funding for education and
schools, which have churned out the latest automobile engineers, but
the U.S. government, under George Bush's tutelage has actually been
cutting funding for education. Compare the results.
While the U.S. automobile industry and many other industries have been
miserably declining, the U.S. oil industry, in marked contrast, has
been making record high profits, profits that have been going thru the
high stratosphere. They are making so much money that they don't even
know what to do with their money. Here's an idea, why don't they build
more refineries? But then, if they do, it will increase supply and
then lower the price of gas, thus reducing their profits, and they
don't want that to happen.
We have oil companies sitting on unused refineries, deliberately so,
completely closed down, while they pretend that they want to sell it to
other oil companies. It's that same old Enron tactic where they
deliberately are creating a shortage.
It was a little more than 5 years ago that the energy companies (which
have very close ties to George Bush and the Republicans), led by Enron,
had deliberately created an energy shortage here in California,
resulting in record high energy prices. California
suffered greatly, while Republicans all over the country laughed at our
misfortune. Now the oil companies (who have very close ties to George
Bush and the Republicans) are doing the same exact thing to the rest of
the country that Enron did to California back in 2000/2001.
There should be an investigation to determine whether the current
energy shortage that has led to record high gas prices is a real
shortage or is the result of deliberate market manipulations. But then
you better believe that this investigation will never be done while the
Republicans are in power, because they now control all branches of our
government. And then ALL the oil companies, each and every single one
of them, all of them donate to the Republican party. So the
Republicans will never allow such an investigation.
We NEED a new energy policy. But not one concocted by the oil
industry, as we have now. Here's just one example of how things could
change, the Clinton administration, for example, he ordered sharp
increases in the efficiency of air-conditioners, and this worked out
very well, because air-conditioners are a major demand on peak load
days. But when Bush became President in 2001, just to placate the
energy industry that financed his campaign, Bush immediately retracted
and eliminated Clinton's call for increased a/c efficiency.
A good national energy policy would do 3 very basic things:
#1. Curb demand & implement energy conservation policies
#2. Modernize transmission, and
#3. Encourage new, nonpolluting power sources.
Let's stop wasting that $7 billion per month on the useless Iraq war
and we'll have more than enough money to do all the things that I've
mentioned here.
While I'm at it, let me repost this, it as a perfect example of why we
need to upgrade our nation's infrastructure needs. I posted this last
week, but no one responded to it. So I'll keep re-posting it until
someone responds.
Four years ago, on 9/11/01, hundreds of New York city Firefighters died
in the World Trade Center, because their radio freqencies were not
callibrated to pick up the same radio frequency that the New York city
Police department used. So when the New York city Police, flying in
helicopters clearly saw the twin buildings were near collapse they
tried to warn the firefighters, but the firefighters could not hear
them. The independent and bipartisan 9/11 Commission (whose creation
the Republicans opposed) discovered this, and they emphasized it in the
strongest possible terms that this unorganized communications system
needs to be upgraded. But unfortunately, and we have seen this in the
Katrina disaster, that the 9/11 Commission's reccomendations were
completely ignored. In the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, we found
out that all the radio communications systems of the First Responders
was just as unorganized and failing as it was in 9/11/01 when we lost
hundreds of firemen there.
Fixing the radio communications systems of First Responders, so that
they have the ability to instantly communicate with each other does not
even require that much money, and it would be money very well spent
too. What is required, for the most part, is that all the
communications systems be looked into and organized in a way that
allows all the different departments to communicate with each other.
This should be our first and most immediate concern, to upgrade the
patchwork of emergency communications systems across the country,
because effective and realiable communication is the most basic
lynchpin of any emergency system. This mammoth problem should be fixed
by the federal level, it is the Bush administration that should get
involved here. No one else can solve this problem, as it is, local
officials are very reluctant to give up authority on their own to buy
their own little customized systems.
An independent/bipartisan Katrina commission would undoubtedly expose
this same exact problem, if and when, or if ever we get such a
commission created to study the government's handling of the Katrina
disaster.
Abel Malcolm
THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Educate yourself & go to these links:
http://www.moveon.org & http://www.humanity.org &
http://ww11.e-tractions.com/truemajority/run/oreo &
www.democracynow.org
& http://alternet.org/ & http://www.huffingtonpost.com &
http://thinkprogress.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "chess" |
|
| Title: Re: New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
09 Oct 2005 05:30:53 AM |
|
|
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:QW52f.2494$Zf.291@fe05.lga...
Aparently, Flex-Fuel cars are a big hit in Brazil. They can run on 100%
bio-alcohol as well as gasoline. The kicker is the alcohol is 1/2 the
price of gas.
Why don't we see this sort of inovation in America?
Big Oil!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Boy" |
|
| Title: Re: New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
09 Oct 2005 04:41:40 PM |
|
|
"chess" <chess88@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Ji62f.3245$gj1.472@fed1read05...
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:QW52f.2494$Zf.291@fe05.lga...
Aparently, Flex-Fuel cars are a big hit in Brazil. They can run on 100%
bio-alcohol as well as gasoline. The kicker is the alcohol is 1/2 the
price of gas.
Why don't we see this sort of inovation in America?
Big Oil!
It is now 1/2 the price but it will be higher or at the same price of gas
when the price drops back down.
.
|
|
|
| User: "PagCal" |
|
| Title: Re: New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
09 Oct 2005 07:18:35 PM |
|
|
Roy Boy wrote:
"chess" <chess88@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Ji62f.3245$gj1.472@fed1read05...
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:QW52f.2494$Zf.291@fe05.lga...
Aparently, Flex-Fuel cars are a big hit in Brazil. They can run on 100%
bio-alcohol as well as gasoline. The kicker is the alcohol is 1/2 the
price of gas.
Why don't we see this sort of inovation in America?
Big Oil!
It is now 1/2 the price but it will be higher or at the same price of gas
when the price drops back down.
Gas will never come back down.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Boy" |
|
| Title: Re: New Energy Policy Needed & an Upgrading of Infrastructure |
11 Oct 2005 06:55:40 PM |
|
|
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:vri2f.10165$Ue7.339@fe03.lga...
Roy Boy wrote:
"chess" <chess88@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Ji62f.3245$gj1.472@fed1read05...
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:QW52f.2494$Zf.291@fe05.lga...
Aparently, Flex-Fuel cars are a big hit in Brazil. They can run on 100%
bio-alcohol as well as gasoline. The kicker is the alcohol is 1/2 the
price of gas.
Why don't we see this sort of inovation in America?
Big Oil!
It is now 1/2 the price but it will be higher or at the same price of gas
when the price drops back down.
Gas will never come back down.
Yes it will. If the oil companies don't let it come back down there will be
companies that will bring gasoline from other countries to the US.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|