| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" |
| Date: |
24 Oct 2003 06:00:04 AM |
| Object: |
New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
I guess not too many people knew that Deibold's "blackbox" paperless voting
machines were already used in the 2000 election. Not surprisingly, there is
evidence from Diebold's own memos that they had been tampered with and
because of this Gore lost 16,000 votes. That's the official story,
personally I think someone at Diebold did the tampering on behalf of Bu$h.
If these voting machines aren't removed by 2004, you can bet Bu$h will be
elected again, even if no one votes for him...
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
--
--=( Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí )=----- ----- --- - -
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
--- --- ---=================----------- - -
Bin Laden, before turning to the Dark Side:
http://www.sid-ss.net/911/obl-at14.jpg
.
|
|
| User: "that bloke" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
24 Oct 2003 02:32:33 PM |
|
|
Bush is the President now.
And it's just as well. Otherwise billions of tax dollars wouldn't be
disappearing into a black hole in Iraq.
Get over it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
24 Oct 2003 06:39:46 PM |
|
|
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, "that bloke" <th@t.bloke.com>
wrote:
Bush is the President now.
And it's just as well. Otherwise billions of tax dollars wouldn't be
disappearing into a black hole in Iraq.
Get over it.
Is that what you'll be saying on the way to Ashcroft's concentration camp?
I, and the rest of us aren't going to "get over it".
Bu$h is going down, I will personally see to it. Watch...
--
--=( Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí )=----- ----- --- - -
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
--- --- ---=================----------- - -
Bin Laden, before turning to the Dark Side:
http://www.sid-ss.net/911/obl-at14.jpg
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
24 Oct 2003 07:13:08 PM |
|
|
"R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" <abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote in message
news:OBK941EC807276690001138@r2-dv8.anarchy.gov...
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, "that bloke" <th@t.bloke.com>
wrote:
Bush is the President now.
And it's just as well. Otherwise billions of tax dollars wouldn't be
disappearing into a black hole in Iraq.
Get over it.
Is that what you'll be saying on the way to Ashcroft's concentration camp?
I, and the rest of us aren't going to "get over it".
Bu$h is going down, I will personally see to it. Watch...
Is that a death threat to the office of the President?
.
|
|
|
| User: "--= Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí =--" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 12:23:22 AM |
|
|
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, "Daniel" <Daniel@home.com>
wrote:
"R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" <abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote in message
news:OBK941EC807276690001138@r2-dv8.anarchy.gov...
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, "that bloke"
<th@t.bloke.com> wrote:
Bush is the President now.
And it's just as well. Otherwise billions of tax dollars wouldn't
be disappearing into a black hole in Iraq.
Get over it.
Is that what you'll be saying on the way to Ashcroft's concentration
camp?
I, and the rest of us aren't going to "get over it".
Bu$h is going down, I will personally see to it. Watch...
Is that a death threat to the office of the President?
No, it is a legal threat. George WMD Bu$h will be imprisoned for his
crimes. if they choose to execute him on the Texas electric chair, then so
be it.
--
--=( Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí )=----- ----- --- - -
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
--- --- ---=================----------- - -
Bin Laden, before turning to the Dark Side:
http://www.sid-ss.net/911/obl-at14.jpg
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Weather Underground" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
24 Oct 2003 05:22:50 PM |
|
|
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 12:13 AM, Daniel <mailto:Daniel@home.com> wrote:
"R.A.G.U.N.S. =A8" <abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote in message
news:OBK941EC807276690001138@r2-dv8.anarchy.gov...
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, "that bloke" <
th@t.bloke.com>
wrote:
Bush is the President now.
And it's just as well. Otherwise billions of tax dollars wouldn't
be
disappearing into a black hole in Iraq.
Get over it.
Is that what you'll be saying on the way to Ashcroft's
concentration
camp?
I, and the rest of us aren't going to "get over it".
Bu$h is going down, I will personally see to it. Watch...
Is that a death threat to the office of the President?
***** YOU.. that's a threat to Vote in the next election YOu
FUCKHead!!!
You Bushite ***** parasites can't take that people in this country
(USA) hate the way he stole the election, then stole all their money (
record surplus to record deficit in 2 years) .. And that soon he will
get thrown from office and put up on coruption and war crimes
trials... and if there is justice..
But go ahead and keep the homeland gestapo busy tracking people down
who just post to the usenet.. It distracts them from the real
threats!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
24 Oct 2003 10:45:03 PM |
|
|
"Weather Underground" <WX@fortalnet.com.br> wrote in message
news:BBBF56C2-237648@64.56.247.120...
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 12:13 AM, Daniel <mailto:Daniel@home.com> wrote:
"R.A.G.U.N.S. ¨" <abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote in message
news:OBK941EC807276690001138@r2-dv8.anarchy.gov...
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, "that bloke" <
th@t.bloke.com>
wrote:
Bush is the President now.
And it's just as well. Otherwise billions of tax dollars wouldn't
be
disappearing into a black hole in Iraq.
Get over it.
Is that what you'll be saying on the way to Ashcroft's
concentration
camp?
I, and the rest of us aren't going to "get over it".
Bu$h is going down, I will personally see to it. Watch...
Is that a death threat to the office of the President?
***** YOU.. that's a threat to Vote in the next election YOu
FUCKHead!!!
Do you need a hug? You seem a little hostile.... Also, you NEED to vote in
the next election, not just threaten to. It is your duty to vote.
You Bushite ***** parasites can't take that people in this country
(USA) hate the way he stole the election
Stole? Do you understand how the Electoral College works? Not too bright
there, are ya bubba?
Please read this: http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecworks.htm I made it easy for
you.
then stole all their money (record surplus to record deficit in 2 years) ..
And that soon he will
get thrown from office and put up on coruption and war crimes
trials... and if there is justice..
You really crack me up bubba! It's your ignorance, it's so..... sincere!
But go ahead and keep the homeland gestapo busy tracking people down
who just post to the usenet.. It distracts them from the real
threats!!!!
I'm surprised, with your advanced case of cretinism, that you could even
figure out how to turn on a computer. But I'm proud of you bubba, you beat
the odds.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
24 Oct 2003 11:31:29 PM |
|
|
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:3lmmb.1131$RQ1.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
<snip>
Stole? Do you understand how the Electoral College works?
Not too bright
there, are ya bubba?
Please read this: http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecworks.htm I
made it easy for
you.
Now read slowly.....the voting machine mechanisms took away
16,000 votes... with those 16,000 votes, Gore would have won
the electoral votes for Florida....as well as the popular
vote for the US.... understand now?
Where do they get these conservatives, anyway? From
kindergarten?
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
24 Oct 2003 11:45:10 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:GLCdnXqgmrI-YQSiRVn-gQ@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:3lmmb.1131$RQ1.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
<snip>
Stole? Do you understand how the Electoral College works?
Not too bright
there, are ya bubba?
Please read this: http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecworks.htm I
made it easy for
you.
Now read slowly.....the voting machine mechanisms took away
16,000 votes... with those 16,000 votes, Gore would have won
the electoral votes for Florida....as well as the popular
vote for the US.... understand now?
Now read slowly... of those 16,000 votes, how many were for Gore? How many
were taken away from Bush?
Was there anything illegal going on? No. Was this the way all elections have
been held for many years previous? Yes.
Newsflash!!!! GORE LOST THE ELECTION!! Get over it already!
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
25 Oct 2003 02:14:35 AM |
|
|
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:qdnmb.982$Px2.793@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:GLCdnXqgmrI-YQSiRVn-gQ@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:3lmmb.1131$RQ1.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
<snip>
Stole? Do you understand how the Electoral College
works?
Not too bright
there, are ya bubba?
Please read this: http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecworks.htm
I
made it easy for
you.
Now read slowly.....the voting machine mechanisms took
away
16,000 votes... with those 16,000 votes, Gore would have
won
the electoral votes for Florida....as well as the
popular
vote for the US.... understand now?
Now read slowly... of those 16,000 votes, how many were
for Gore? How many
were taken away from Bush?
Was there anything illegal going on? No. Was this the way
all elections have
been held for many years previous? Yes.
You apparently didn't read the entire article, twit. All
16,000 belonged to Gore until another 600 voters voted.
Was there anything illegal going on? Maybe. Was this the way
all elections have been held for many years previous? NO.
You twit, these machines were new.
"DELAND, Fla., Nov. 11 - Something very strange happened on
election night to Deborah Tannenbaum, a Democratic Party
official in Volusia County. At 10 p.m., she called the
county elections department and learned that Al Gore was
leading George W. Bush 83,000 votes to 62,000. But when she
checked the county's Web site for an update half an hour
later, she found a startling development: Gore's count had
dropped by 16,000 votes, while an obscure Socialist
candidate had picked up 10,000--all because of a single
precinct with only 600 voters."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
25 Oct 2003 04:31:58 AM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5bWdndZ-Bb5BvweiRVn-gg@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:qdnmb.982$Px2.793@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:GLCdnXqgmrI-YQSiRVn-gQ@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:3lmmb.1131$RQ1.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
<snip>
Stole? Do you understand how the Electoral College
works?
Not too bright
there, are ya bubba?
Please read this: http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecworks.htm
I
made it easy for
you.
Now read slowly.....the voting machine mechanisms took
away
16,000 votes... with those 16,000 votes, Gore would have
won
the electoral votes for Florida....as well as the
popular
vote for the US.... understand now?
Now read slowly... of those 16,000 votes, how many were
for Gore? How many
were taken away from Bush?
Was there anything illegal going on? No. Was this the way
all elections have
been held for many years previous? Yes.
You apparently didn't read the entire article, twit. All
16,000 belonged to Gore until another 600 voters voted.
Was there anything illegal going on? Maybe. Was this the way
all elections have been held for many years previous? NO.
You twit, these machines were new.
"DELAND, Fla., Nov. 11 - Something very strange happened on
election night to Deborah Tannenbaum, a Democratic Party
official in Volusia County. At 10 p.m., she called the
county elections department and learned that Al Gore was
leading George W. Bush 83,000 votes to 62,000. But when she
checked the county's Web site for an update half an hour
later, she found a startling development: Gore's count had
dropped by 16,000 votes, while an obscure Socialist
candidate had picked up 10,000--all because of a single
precinct with only 600 voters."
Who is the twit? Twit! The quote you supply does not, number one, prove
anything. Number two, read your own quote:
"Gore's count had dropped by 16,000 votes, while an obscure Socialist
candidate had picked up 10,000--all because of a single precinct with only
600 voters."
So 600 voters can turn into 16,000 votes for Gore? You forgot to include
something important from the article.... Besides, this is all based on one
person's story?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 12:29:41 AM |
|
|
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:iqrmb.1092$Px2.362@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:5bWdndZ-Bb5BvweiRVn-gg@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:qdnmb.982$Px2.793@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:GLCdnXqgmrI-YQSiRVn-gQ@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:3lmmb.1131$RQ1.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
<snip>
Stole? Do you understand how the Electoral College
works?
Not too bright
there, are ya bubba?
Please read this:
http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecworks.htm
I
made it easy for
you.
Now read slowly.....the voting machine mechanisms
took
away
16,000 votes... with those 16,000 votes, Gore would
have
won
the electoral votes for Florida....as well as the
popular
vote for the US.... understand now?
Now read slowly... of those 16,000 votes, how many
were
for Gore? How many
were taken away from Bush?
Was there anything illegal going on? No. Was this the
way
all elections have
been held for many years previous? Yes.
You apparently didn't read the entire article, twit. All
16,000 belonged to Gore until another 600 voters voted.
Was there anything illegal going on? Maybe. Was this the
way
all elections have been held for many years previous?
NO.
You twit, these machines were new.
"DELAND, Fla., Nov. 11 - Something very strange happened
on
election night to Deborah Tannenbaum, a Democratic Party
official in Volusia County. At 10 p.m., she called the
county elections department and learned that Al Gore was
leading George W. Bush 83,000 votes to 62,000. But when
she
checked the county's Web site for an update half an hour
later, she found a startling development: Gore's count
had
dropped by 16,000 votes, while an obscure Socialist
candidate had picked up 10,000--all because of a single
precinct with only 600 voters."
Who is the twit? Twit! The quote you supply does not,
number one, prove
anything. Number two, read your own quote:
"Gore's count had dropped by 16,000 votes, while an
obscure Socialist
candidate had picked up 10,000--all because of a single
precinct with only
600 voters."
So 600 voters can turn into 16,000 votes for Gore? You
forgot to include
something important from the article.... Besides, this is
all based on one
person's story?
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you get it?
No, not just one person. Read the balance at the link....
many many many saw and reported the issues but were IGNORED
in Jeb Bush's state.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spitfire" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 01:05:06 AM |
|
|
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you get it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop a legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 05:02:49 AM |
|
|
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so... the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 11:07:29 AM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vqmdnWnzuN9HNAaiRVn-tA@wideopenwest.com...
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so... the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
Kind of like Gore wanted to discount absentee voters their rights?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 11:59:11 AM |
|
|
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:lbTmb.3055$RQ1.3001@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:vqmdnWnzuN9HNAaiRVn-tA@wideopenwest.com...
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you
get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop
a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office
wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so...
the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have
as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly
opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
Kind of like Gore wanted to discount absentee voters their
rights?
Hell, we'll let you have all of those discounted absentee
voters as long as we get the black voters Jeb blocked out of
the polls and we get to ditch the new voting machines that
robbed Gore of 16,000 votes. Do you actually think your
absentee voters would have made a bit of difference has ALL
of the votes been counted rather than just adding the
absentee ones on?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Killer Pretzel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 12:49:15 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
news:HqWdnYTZJr_slgGiRVn-sQ@wideopenwest.com:
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:lbTmb.3055$RQ1.3001@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:vqmdnWnzuN9HNAaiRVn-tA@wideopenwest.com...
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you
get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop
a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office
wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so...
the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have
as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly
opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
Kind of like Gore wanted to discount absentee voters their
rights?
Hell, we'll let you have all of those discounted absentee
voters as long as we get the black voters Jeb blocked out of
the polls and we get to ditch the new voting machines that
robbed Gore of 16,000 votes. Do you actually think your
absentee voters would have made a bit of difference has ALL
of the votes been counted rather than just adding the
absentee ones on?
What I don't understand is why only certain absentee ballots in certain
Florida counties were so precious while others were actively blocked by
the BushCorp. Oh wait, I do understand. Absentee ballots in primarily
republican counties from people who were more likely to vote for Bush
were good. Absentee ballots in primarily democratic counties and from
people more likely to vote for Gore were bad. Therefore, you go on TV and
rant and rave about making sure the first category of absentee ballots
are counted (even if they are late or illegally postmarked or illegally
signed) while you go to court to sue to actively prevent any counting of
the second category of absentee ballots - even if they are perfectly
legal and on time.
--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas,
probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on -
shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again."
-George WMD Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
"Don't be fooled again"
-Me, August 1, 2003.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 03:42:42 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:HqWdnYTZJr_slgGiRVn-sQ@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:lbTmb.3055$RQ1.3001@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:vqmdnWnzuN9HNAaiRVn-tA@wideopenwest.com...
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you
get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop
a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office
wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so...
the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have
as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly
opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
Kind of like Gore wanted to discount absentee voters their
rights?
Hell, we'll let you have all of those discounted absentee
voters as long as we get the black voters Jeb blocked out of
the polls and we get to ditch the new voting machines that
robbed Gore of 16,000 votes. Do you actually think your
absentee voters would have made a bit of difference has ALL
of the votes been counted rather than just adding the
absentee ones on?
Well, you kind of missed the point I was trying to make in that Gore isn't
without his faults as well. He tried to get some completely legal absentee
ballots discounted just so he could win. Does that make him better or worse
or the same as GWB? They were both playing the game and Bush played it
better. As to the voting machines robbing Gore. If there was illegal
activity with regards to these machines, heads should roll. How come the
mainstream media hasn't picked up this story? Why isn't there an
investigation?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Killer Pretzel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 03:52:08 PM |
|
|
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in
news:mdXmb.3318$RQ1.375@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:HqWdnYTZJr_slgGiRVn-sQ@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:lbTmb.3055$RQ1.3001@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:vqmdnWnzuN9HNAaiRVn-tA@wideopenwest.com...
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you
get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop
a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office
wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so...
the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have
as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly
opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
Kind of like Gore wanted to discount absentee voters their
rights?
Hell, we'll let you have all of those discounted absentee
voters as long as we get the black voters Jeb blocked out of
the polls and we get to ditch the new voting machines that
robbed Gore of 16,000 votes. Do you actually think your
absentee voters would have made a bit of difference has ALL
of the votes been counted rather than just adding the
absentee ones on?
Well, you kind of missed the point I was trying to make in that Gore
isn't without his faults as well. He tried to get some completely
legal absentee ballots discounted just so he could win. Does that make
him better or worse or the same as GWB? They were both playing the
Gore is and was an *****. If I had been registered as a democrat in 1988, I
would have voted against him in the primary. However, if you are going to
contend that Gore tried to have *legal* absentee ballots discounted,
you'll need a cite for that. As I recall, the only absentees they went
after were those that were incorrectly postmarked or illegally signed.
game and Bush played it better. As to the voting machines robbing
Gore. If there was illegal activity with regards to these machines,
heads should roll. How come the mainstream media hasn't picked up this
story? Why isn't there an investigation?
Two words: corporate media. Why isn't there an investigation into all the
lies Bush told in the runup to the war? The media is owned and controlled
by people who want Bush to stay in power. Tax cuts, consolidation,
deregulation - Bush is everything they want. Welcome back to the 9th
century.
--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas,
probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on -
shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again."
-George WMD Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
"Don't be fooled again"
-Me, August 1, 2003.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 09:09:17 PM |
|
|
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:mdXmb.3318$RQ1.375@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:HqWdnYTZJr_slgGiRVn-sQ@wideopenwest.com...
<snip>
Hell, we'll let you have all of those discounted
absentee
voters as long as we get the black voters Jeb blocked
out of
the polls and we get to ditch the new voting machines
that
robbed Gore of 16,000 votes. Do you actually think your
absentee voters would have made a bit of difference has
ALL
of the votes been counted rather than just adding the
absentee ones on?
Well, you kind of missed the point I was trying to make in
that Gore isn't
without his faults as well. He tried to get some
completely legal absentee
ballots discounted just so he could win.
He should have simply made certain that ALL of the absentee
ballots were counted rather than simply trying to discount
the ones that they conveniently counted in Bush strong
counties and yet overlooking on Bush weak counties.
Does that make him better or worse
or the same as GWB? They were both playing the game and
Bush played it
better. As to the voting machines robbing Gore. If there
was illegal
activity with regards to these machines, heads should
roll. How come the
mainstream media hasn't picked up this story? Why isn't
there an
investigation?
Boy, you are a twit, aren't you? This thread started with an
article/story about the machines... it has been all over the
press in Ohio. Where are you living? Puerto Rico or
something?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 09:27:58 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2uednZCF1KHDEQGiRVn-uA@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:mdXmb.3318$RQ1.375@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:HqWdnYTZJr_slgGiRVn-sQ@wideopenwest.com...
<snip>
Hell, we'll let you have all of those discounted
absentee
voters as long as we get the black voters Jeb blocked
out of
the polls and we get to ditch the new voting machines
that
robbed Gore of 16,000 votes. Do you actually think your
absentee voters would have made a bit of difference has
ALL
of the votes been counted rather than just adding the
absentee ones on?
Well, you kind of missed the point I was trying to make in
that Gore isn't
without his faults as well. He tried to get some
completely legal absentee
ballots discounted just so he could win.
He should have simply made certain that ALL of the absentee
ballots were counted rather than simply trying to discount
the ones that they conveniently counted in Bush strong
counties and yet overlooking on Bush weak counties.
Does that make him better or worse
or the same as GWB? They were both playing the game and
Bush played it
better. As to the voting machines robbing Gore. If there
was illegal
activity with regards to these machines, heads should
roll. How come the
mainstream media hasn't picked up this story? Why isn't
there an
investigation?
Boy, you are a twit, aren't you? This thread started with an
article/story about the machines... it has been all over the
press in Ohio. Where are you living? Puerto Rico or
something?
You mean this one?
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
LOL, you twit, an article from New Zealand AND it is simply promoting a
BOOK!!! ROFLMFAO!
Yes, one person writes a book, and viola! It has to be true! LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
27 Oct 2003 12:35:14 AM |
|
|
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:2h0nb.3516$Px2.2708@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:2uednZCF1KHDEQGiRVn-uA@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:mdXmb.3318$RQ1.375@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:HqWdnYTZJr_slgGiRVn-sQ@wideopenwest.com...
<snip>
Hell, we'll let you have all of those discounted
absentee
voters as long as we get the black voters Jeb
blocked
out of
the polls and we get to ditch the new voting
machines
that
robbed Gore of 16,000 votes. Do you actually think
your
absentee voters would have made a bit of difference
has
ALL
of the votes been counted rather than just adding
the
absentee ones on?
Well, you kind of missed the point I was trying to
make in
that Gore isn't
without his faults as well. He tried to get some
completely legal absentee
ballots discounted just so he could win.
He should have simply made certain that ALL of the
absentee
ballots were counted rather than simply trying to
discount
the ones that they conveniently counted in Bush strong
counties and yet overlooking on Bush weak counties.
Does that make him better or worse
or the same as GWB? They were both playing the game
and
Bush played it
better. As to the voting machines robbing Gore. If
there
was illegal
activity with regards to these machines, heads should
roll. How come the
mainstream media hasn't picked up this story? Why
isn't
there an
investigation?
Boy, you are a twit, aren't you? This thread started
with an
article/story about the machines... it has been all over
the
press in Ohio. Where are you living? Puerto Rico or
something?
You mean this one?
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
LOL, you twit, an article from New Zealand AND it is
simply promoting a
BOOK!!! ROFLMFAO!
Yes, one person writes a book, and viola! It has to be
true! LOL
Did you happen to notice that the first quote from the link
you provided was from the Washington Post Sunday , November
12, 2000 ; Page A22. Yeah, right, it wasn't out in any
mainstream media. Did you bother to read the link you
provided before you made a complete idiot out of yourself?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spitfire" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 04:41:24 PM |
|
|
Daniel wrote:
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:HqWdnYTZJr_slgGiRVn-sQ@wideopenwest.com...
"Daniel" <Daniel@home.com> wrote in message
news:lbTmb.3055$RQ1.3001@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:vqmdnWnzuN9HNAaiRVn-tA@wideopenwest.com...
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you
get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop
a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office
wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so...
the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have
as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly
opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
Kind of like Gore wanted to discount absentee voters their
rights?
Hell, we'll let you have all of those discounted absentee
voters as long as we get the black voters Jeb blocked out of
the polls and we get to ditch the new voting machines that
robbed Gore of 16,000 votes. Do you actually think your
absentee voters would have made a bit of difference has ALL
of the votes been counted rather than just adding the
absentee ones on?
Well, you kind of missed the point I was trying to make in that Gore isn't
without his faults as well. He tried to get some completely legal absentee
ballots discounted just so he could win. Does that make him better or worse
or the same as GWB? They were both playing the game and Bush played it
better. As to the voting machines robbing Gore. If there was illegal
activity with regards to these machines, heads should roll. How come the
mainstream media hasn't picked up this story? Why isn't there an
investigation?
http://www.fair.org/media-woes/media-woes.html
http://www.takebackthemedia.com
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spitfire" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 04:09:33 PM |
|
|
Daniel wrote:
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vqmdnWnzuN9HNAaiRVn-tA@wideopenwest.com...
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so... the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
Kind of like Gore wanted to discount absentee voters their rights?
Oh look, another lie.
Gore insisted all the absentee ballots were counted. A lot of them
came from Israel and they loved Joe. Then it was discovered the Republicans
were completing incomplete absentee ballots for Bush that should have
been disqualified and throwing out the ones for Gore.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spitfire" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 05:56:52 AM |
|
|
JoettaB wrote:
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so... the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
He might have if he didn't behave as if he had performed
a Right Wing coup of the Country.
The guy acts like he has a mandate even though more people voted
against him.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 12:00:19 PM |
|
|
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9BB620.76E14DB9@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you
get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop
a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office
wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so...
the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have
as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly
opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
He might have if he didn't behave as if he had performed
a Right Wing coup of the Country.
The guy acts like he has a mandate even though more people
voted
against him.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
It just shows his arrogance and most people are sick of it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spitfire" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
26 Oct 2003 04:04:59 PM |
|
|
JoettaB wrote:
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9BB620.76E14DB9@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
"Spitfire" <spitfire78@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3F9B71C1.F57F09E@my-deja.com...
JoettaB wrote:
Gore's count DROPPED... you twit. DROPPED. Do you
get
it?
Yeah. You can't accept the fact that Bush sued to stop
a
legal
ballot count that it later turned out that he lost.
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
Doesn't matter. We still know that the twit in office
wasn't
the one the majority of people voted to put there, so...
the
twit will never have the respect he would normally have
as
president. He might have if he hadn't so admantly
opposed
recounts. But he did. So he won't. In fact, he'll more
likely be a one-time wonder like his daddy.
He might have if he didn't behave as if he had performed
a Right Wing coup of the Country.
The guy acts like he has a mandate even though more people
voted
against him.
It just shows his arrogance and most people are sick of it.
http://www.bushflash.com/ihr.html
--
Spitfire
You done yet?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Loblaw" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
25 Oct 2003 04:38:15 AM |
|
|
Yep, Let's see. Bush became President of the USA in 2000. Bush
supporters are still retaliating against any criticism by blaming a guy who
was President 3 years ago.
Now, some bright light in the USA is saying "New Evidence of 2000 Vote
Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold"
I'm beginning to think that all people from the USA are fucked in the head.
The US motto is "look back and blame!"
I hope you accept my opinoin. Now, can someone please tell me why I should
want to be an American?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
25 Oct 2003 02:46:57 PM |
|
|
"Bob Loblaw" <Bob_Loblaw_remove@lycos.de> wrote in message
news:bndggu$102blf$1@ID-15498.news.uni-berlin.de...
Yep, Let's see. Bush became President of the USA in 2000. Bush
supporters are still retaliating against any criticism by blaming a guy
who
was President 3 years ago.
Some are.
Now, some bright light in the USA is saying "New Evidence of 2000 Vote
Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold"
Pretty amazing isn't it?
I'm beginning to think that all people from the USA are fucked in the
head.
Some are, but mostly its Politicians (Democrat AND Republican)
The US motto is "look back and blame!"
Seems to be the case huh?
I hope you accept my opinoin. Now, can someone please tell me why I
should
want to be an American?
Your opinion is always welcome here, someone may not agree with it, but it's
good talk about things..... Do you want to be an American?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
25 Oct 2003 02:11:29 PM |
|
|
Bob Loblaw wrote:
Yep, Let's see. Bush became President of the USA in 2000. Bush
supporters are still retaliating against any criticism by blaming a guy who
was President 3 years ago.
Now, some bright light in the USA is saying "New Evidence of 2000 Vote
Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold"
I'm beginning to think that all people from the USA are fucked in the head.
The US motto is "look back and blame!"
I hope you accept my opinoin. Now, can someone please tell me why I should
want to be an American?
America is not the administration, regardless of what the rightards tell
you. You can hate Bush and not hate America.
You have much to be proud of.
Don't let the current tone of the country get to you. It's the last gasp
before the death of conservatism in the U.S. They may not be going down
without a fight, but they're still going down.
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
revolutionary act.
- George Orwell
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "that bloke" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence of 2000 Vote Rigging By Bu$h & Diebold |
25 Oct 2003 06:57:22 AM |
|
|
Was there anything illegal going on? No. Was this the way all elections
have
been held for many years previous? Yes.
Great to see that you condone the loss of democractic voting fairness.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
