| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Black Elk" |
| Date: |
03 Sep 2005 04:09:01 PM |
| Object: |
New Orleans and Baghdad-two sides of the same policy |
New Orleans and Baghdad-two sides of the same policy
By Bill Van Auken
3 September 2005
As US National Guard troops-just returned from Iraq-moved into New Orleans
Friday with "shoot-to-kill" orders, and Blackhawk helicopters flew over the
city, the essential unity between the policies pursued by Washington at home
and abroad found stark expression.
Lt. Gen. Steven Blum of the National Guard said half of the 7,000 National
Guardsmen arriving in Louisiana had shortly before been serving overseas and
were "highly proficient in the use of lethal force."
Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco declared, "They have M-16s and they are
locked and loaded. These troops know how to shoot to kill... and I expect
they will."
The reaction of the Bush administration to the catastrophe of its own making
in the invasion of Iraq and its response to the disaster unleashed by
Hurricane Katrina on the US Gulf Coast have both revealed gross incompetence
and a criminal contempt for human life. Both have led to soaring death tolls
and immense suffering.
There are direct connections between the humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq
and the one that is unfolding in New Orleans. Barely a month ago, Lt.
Colonel Pete Schneider of the Louisiana National Guard complained to the
media that essential equipment the force had taken to Iraq last
October-humvees, high-water vehicles, generators and refuelers-had been left
in the country. He stressed that in the event of a serious natural disaster,
the lack of the equipment could pose problems in mounting a speedy rescue
and relief response.
The failure of the levee and the flooding of 80 percent of New Orleans are
linked to repeated budget cuts carried out by the Bush administration since
the war in Iraq began.
In the 2004 budget, the Army Corps of Engineers requested $11 million for a
hurricane protection project in the New Orleans area. It was allotted just
half that amount, $5.5 million. In the 2005 budget, the Corps requested
$22.5 million, and received one quarter of its request, $5.7 million. In the
2006 budget, the Bush administration proposed an appropriation of just $2.9
million.
Where the money meant to reinforce the levees and protect New Orleans went
was no mystery to local officials. Walter Maestri, emergency management
chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, told the Times-Picayune in June 2004:
"It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to
handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price
we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can't be finished, and we
are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue
for us."
Meanwhile, FEMA-the Federal Emergency Management Agency-the principal agency
for dealing with such disasters, has been "systematically downgraded and all
but dismantled by the Department of Homeland Security," as Eric Holdeman,
the director of the Office of Emergency Management in King County,
Washington, wrote in the Washington Post this week. Instead, disaster relief
resources have been shifted to the so-called "global war on terrorism," the
all-purpose pretext for US military aggression abroad.
Vast funds expended on the Iraq war and other acts of US militarism have
been drained away from social spending at home. With the upcoming approval
of yet another emergency spending bill for Iraq, Congress will have
appropriated $250 billion for the war. Washington is spending on average
$5.4 billion a month on the war. Thus, the Pentagon will expend in less than
two months the equivalent of the entire relief package that the Bush
administration has requested for New Orleans and the devastated Gulf Coast.
The outrage of New Orleans' abandoned citizens, who shout "we want help" and
ask angrily why Washington has proven incapable of supplying the most basic
forms of organization or relief, strangely echoes protests by the people of
Baghdad and other Iraqi cities.
With the US occupation now halfway into its third year, three out of four
Iraqi families report irregular electricity. Cuts in water supply are
frequent, and fully 40 percent of urban households report sewage in the
streets. A nationwide health crisis is growing worse, child malnutrition is
widespread, and the carnage against civilians continues every day.
This chaos and gross negligence have characterized the US occupation since
day one. After US troops rolled into Baghdad, mobs were allowed-if not
actively encouraged-to systematically loot Iraqi government facilities,
schools and hospitals, deepening the immense destruction already wrought by
American bombs, shells and missiles.
As a pre-invasion memo leaked from the Blair government in Britain earlier
this year warned, Washington had decided upon war but had given "little
thought" to the invasion's aftermath. That is, as it prepared to militarily
occupy a war-ravaged country of 27 million people, the Bush administration
had no concern or even plans for what would happen to them.
It is a tragic irony that thousands of young men and women in the Louisiana
and Mississippi National Guard are deployed in Iraq, sent to kill and be
killed for a lie. Not a few of them are drawn from poor and working class
families that have suffered the worst from Hurricane Katrina. The Bush
administration and its Democratic allies-having abandoned their fabricated
claims about weapons of mass destruction-now insist that these troops are
fighting a war to bring "democracy" to Iraq.
But the national disgrace in New Orleans poses an obvious question: what can
a government that abandons its own people to die in the streets and presides
over levels of social inequality that shock the conscience of the world
teach anyone about "democracy?"
Iraq was from its origins a predatory war-an exercise in international
plunder. It was aimed at employing overwhelming military force to seize
control of vital energy resources and thereby assert the geopolitical
hegemony of American capitalism against its economic rivals.
The plundering of Iraq has gone hand-in-hand with the looting of the
American treasury at home by means of unending cuts in social spending
together with massive tax cuts for the top income brackets. These policies
are carried out by a government and a two-party political system that is
dedicated to serving interests of a financial oligarchy and is as
indifferent to the lives of the poor and working class in New Orleans as it
is to the people of Iraq.
http://wsws.org/articles/2005/sep2005/noir-s03_prn.shtml
--
"Those seeking profits," Jefferson wrote, "were they given total freedom,
would not be the ones to trust to keep government pure and our rights
secure. Indeed, it has always been those seeking wealth who were the source
of corruption in government. No other depositories of power have ever yet
been found, which did not end in converting to their own profit the earnings
of those committed to their charge."
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0618-03.htm
--
The fair use of a copyrighted work:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
