Politics > Politics-USA > New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue."
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Sky King" |
| Date: |
30 Aug 2005 01:13:51 PM |
| Object: |
New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
Scientist at Work | Jon Miller
Scientific Savvy? In U.S., Not Much
By CORNELIA DEAN
Published: August 30, 2005
CHICAGO - When Jon D. Miller looks out across America, which he can
almost do from his 18th-floor office at Northwestern University Medical
School in Chicago, he sees a landscape of haves and have-nots - in
terms not of money, but of knowledge.
Dr. Jon D. Miller of Northwestern says scientific illiteracy undermines
citizens' ability to take part in the democratic process.
Dr. Miller, 63, a political scientist who directs the Center for
Biomedical Communications at the medical school, studies how much
Americans know about science and what they think about it. His findings
are not encouraging.
While scientific literacy has doubled over the past two decades, only
20 to 25 percent of Americans are "scientifically savvy and alert," he
said in an interview. Most of the rest Scientist at Work | Jon Miller
Scientific Savvy? In U.S., Not Much
E-Mail This
Printer-Friendly
Single-Page
Reprints
By CORNELIA DEAN
Published: August 30, 2005
CHICAGO - When Jon D. Miller looks out across America, which he can
almost do from his 18th-floor office at Northwestern University Medical
School in Chicago, he sees a landscape of haves and have-nots - in
terms not of money, but of knowledge.
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
Steve Kagan for The New York Times
Dr. Jon D. Miller of Northwestern says scientific illiteracy undermines
citizens' ability to take part in the democratic process.
Dr. Miller, 63, a political scientist who directs the Center for
Biomedical Communications at the medical school, studies how much
Americans know about science and what they think about it. His findings
are not encouraging.
While scientific literacy has doubled over the past two decades, only
20 to 25 percent of Americans are "scientifically savvy and alert," he
said in an interview. Most of the rest "don't have a clue." At a time
when science permeates debates on everything from global warming to
stem cell research, he said, people's inability to understand basic
scientific concepts undermines their ability to take part in the
democratic process.
At a time when science permeates debates on everything from global
warming to stem cell research, he said, people's inability to
understand basic scientific concepts undermines their ability to take
part in the democratic process.
(the bad news about 9/11 deniers continued here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/30/science/30profile.html)
.
|
|
| User: "SmirkS" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 01:54:35 PM |
|
|
Lie King posted:
While scientific literacy has doubled over the past two decades, only
20 to 25 percent of Americans are "scientifically savvy and alert,"
meaning most people don't know that steel doesn't melt in a fuel fire.
~~
It may be "obvious" that a heavy plane hitting a skyscraper would deliver
a "tremendous" shock, but it doesn't follow that the building must
therefore collapse. In 1945 the Empire State Building was hit by a B-25
bomber, but it was still standing last time I saw it. "Ah yes, but it was
the impact plus the fires!" Well, when the B-25 hit the Empire State
Building "its fuel tanks were reported to have exploded, engulfing the
79th floor in flames", as we read at Empire State Building Withstood
Airplane Impact.
"Ah, but none of the buildings mentioned above were struck by a 390,000
pound aircraft traveling at 350+ m.p.h." Well, each of the Twin Towers was
still standing 50 minutes after being hit, so it was not the impacts which
caused them to collapse. "Ah, but the intense heat of the burning jet
fuel!" Actually, according to NIST's chief WTC-investigator the jet fuel
burnt itself out in less than ten minutes. Don't believe it? Read through
Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11: Claim #6.
What you have heard ever since 9/11 on network TV and in the mainstream
media such as the New York Times and all the other corporate-controlled
newspapers is simply the official story, repeated over and over, on the
assumption that if a lie is repeated often enough then people will believe
it. Especially if it is a big lie.
--
TheTruthHurts.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sky King" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 02:38:10 PM |
|
|
<SmirkS> wrote:
Lie King posted:
While scientific literacy has doubled over the past two decades, only
20 to 25 percent of Americans are "scientifically savvy and alert,"
meaning most people don't know that steel doesn't melt in a fuel fire.
Only the 9/11 Denial Movement, to whom you have turned over your brain,
claims everyone believes that.
Therefore, the NYT article is about people like you, Smirky.
Have a swell day, loony.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SmirkS" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 03:06:30 PM |
|
|
Sky King posted:
Only the 9/11 Denial Movement, to whom you have turned over your brain,
claims everyone believes that.
you know nothing about me.
but i have to consider that you lie for a living. no one with a life would
spend this much time supporting a theory as dumb as the one you claim.
Therefore, the NYT article is about people like you, Smirky.
Have a swell day, loony.
having one, thanks.
--
TheTruthHurts.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sky King" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 06:26:28 PM |
|
|
<SmirkS> wrote:
Sky King posted:
Only the 9/11 Denial Movement, to whom you have turned over your brain,
claims everyone believes that.
you know nothing about me.
Except what you have written right here. Duh.
but i have to consider that you lie for a living. no one with a life would
spend this much time supporting a theory as dumb as the one you claim.
You see, I know a lot about you. You just illustrated my statement
above, smirky.
Therefore, the NYT article is about people like you, Smirky.
Have a swell day, loony.
having one, thanks.
Not with that sore butt I just kicked raw, smirky.
--
TheTruthHurts.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
31 Aug 2005 08:05:15 AM |
|
|
<SmirkS> wrote:
Lie King posted:
While scientific literacy has doubled over the past two decades, only
20 to 25 percent of Americans are "scientifically savvy and alert,"
meaning most people don't know that steel doesn't melt in a fuel fire.
[snip]
Meaning that you have to be "scientifically unsavvy" to believe
that such a statement has anything to do with the collapse
of the WTC.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 06:29:28 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:54:35 -0500, "<SmirkS>" <me@privacy.net> wrote:
Lie King posted:
While scientific literacy has doubled over the past two decades, only
20 to 25 percent of Americans are "scientifically savvy and alert,"
meaning most people don't know that steel doesn't melt in a fuel fire.
~~
It may be "obvious" that a heavy plane hitting a skyscraper would deliver
a "tremendous" shock, but it doesn't follow that the building must
therefore collapse. In 1945 the Empire State Building was hit by a B-25
bomber, but it was still standing last time I saw it. "Ah yes, but it was
the impact plus the fires!" Well, when the B-25 hit the Empire State
Building "its fuel tanks were reported to have exploded, engulfing the
79th floor in flames", as we read at Empire State Building Withstood
Airplane Impact.
And a B-25 weighs less than one engine on a 767.
B-25: 21,100 pounds empty, 33,000 pounds normal loaded, 35,000 pounds
gross, 41,800 pounds maximum overload.
A 767 engine - around 63,000 pounds
***
The normal fuel load on a B-25 was 974 gallons, a 767 carries 23,980
gallons.
***
The B-25 made a hole in the Empire State Building that was eighteen
feet wide and twenty feet high.
The 767 in WTC1 made a hole that was probably 150 feet across and 30
or 40 feet high.
***
The WTC was tube-in-tube construction and the Empire State Building
was a traditional steel beam building with lots of redundancy.
***
Do you begin to see a pattern?
.
|
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 'official' 9/11 Lies - bushkulties "don't have a clue." |
01 Sep 2005 08:36:38 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:29:28 -0400, Disinformation wrote:
Do you begin to see a pattern?
If you could do that, you'd notice that no one had
more means, motive, or opportunity to cause 9/11
than your fascist fuhrer Bush and his crime gang.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/270605insidejob.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 'official' 9/11 Lies - bushkulties "don't have a clue." |
03 Sep 2005 07:38:33 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:36:38 -0400, * US * wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:29:28 -0400, Disinformation wrote:
Do you begin to see a pattern?
If you could do that, you'd notice that no one had
more means, motive, or opportunity to cause 9/11
than your fascist fuhrer Bush and his crime gang.
You need to look again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 'official' 9/11 Lies - bushkulties "don't have a clue." |
03 Sep 2005 10:42:23 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:29:28 -0400, Disinformation wrote:
Do you begin to see a pattern?
If you could do that, you'd notice that no one had
more means, motive, or opportunity to cause 9/11
than your fascist fuhrer Bush and his crime gang.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/270605insidejob.htm
You can't name a one, loser.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 'official' 9/11 Lies - bushkulties "don't have a clue." |
04 Sep 2005 08:35:11 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 23:42:23 -0400, * US * wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:29:28 -0400, Disinformation wrote:
Do you begin to see a pattern?
If you could do that, you'd notice that no one had
more means, motive, or opportunity to cause 9/11
than your fascist fuhrer Bush and his crime gang.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/270605insidejob.htm
You can't name a one, loser.
Usama bin Laden.
.
|
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 'official' 9/11 Lies - bushkulties "don't have a clue." |
05 Sep 2005 09:01:57 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:29:28 -0400, Disinformation wrote:
Do you begin to see a pattern?
If you could do that, you'd notice that no one had
more means, motive, or opportunity to cause 9/11
than your fascist fuhrer Bush and his crime gang.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/270605insidejob.htm
You can't name a one, loser. Osama is working
with Bush and Cheney. If you weren't stupefied
you'd have known that fact for awhile now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 'official' 9/11 Lies - bushkulties "don't have a clue." |
05 Sep 2005 08:16:13 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 10:01:57 -0400, * US * wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:29:28 -0400, Disinformation wrote:
Do you begin to see a pattern?
If you could do that, you'd notice that no one had
more means, motive, or opportunity to cause 9/11
than your fascist fuhrer Bush and his crime gang.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/270605insidejob.htm
Already did.
.
|
|
|
| User: "* US *" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 'official' 9/11 Lies - bushkulties "don't have a clue." |
06 Sep 2005 09:40:29 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:29:28 -0400, Disinformation wrote:
Do you begin to see a pattern?
If you could do that, you'd notice that no one had
more means, motive, or opportunity to cause 9/11
than your fascist fuhrer Bush and his crime gang.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/270605insidejob.htm
You can't name a one, loser. Osama is working
with Bush and Cheney. If you weren't stupefied
you'd have known that fact for awhile now.
Bush has obeyed Osama's every command, in fact.
"Disinformation" is the slave of bin Laden no less.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Marcum" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
01 Sep 2005 04:50:00 AM |
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.politics.]
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:29:28 -0400,
<> wrote:
And a B-25 weighs less than one engine on a 767.
B-25: 21,100 pounds empty, 33,000 pounds normal loaded, 35,000 pounds
gross, 41,800 pounds maximum overload.
A 767 engine - around 63,000 pounds
***
The normal fuel load on a B-25 was 974 gallons, a 767 carries 23,980
gallons.
***
The B-25 made a hole in the Empire State Building that was eighteen
feet wide and twenty feet high.
The 767 in WTC1 made a hole that was probably 150 feet across and 30
or 40 feet high.
***
The WTC was tube-in-tube construction and the Empire State Building
was a traditional steel beam building with lots of redundancy.
***
Do you begin to see a pattern?
How big was the hole in WTC 7? How many pounds was the airplane that
hit it?
--
Don't let the oil companies do to the rest of America what Katrina did
to New Orleans!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ghidorah" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 02:25:46 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:13:51 -0700, Sky King wrote:
<snip>
(the bad news about 9/11 deniers continued here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/30/science/30profile.html)
Now that's some concrete evidence you present there, that really clears up
many of the questions concerning 9/11. I really like how it has nothing to
do with 9/11. Are you implying that anyone who questions the events of
9/11 lack the mental facilities to understand the issue? I can only
assume you include yourself in the the 20% to 25% of "scientifically
savvy and alert" Americans, so you should have no problem grasping the
following:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/index.php?n=1&id=1
-ghidorah
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sky King" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 02:44:18 PM |
|
|
ghidorah wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:13:51 -0700, Sky King wrote:
<snip>
(the bad news about 9/11 deniers continued here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/30/science/30profile.html)
Now that's some concrete evidence you present there, that really clears up
many of the questions concerning 9/11. I really like how it has nothing to
do with 9/11.
That's a hoot. It has everything to do with 9/11 Deniers. Apparently,
you're upset so you must be one of them.
Are you implying that anyone who questions the events of
9/11 lack the mental facilities to understand the issue?
It has been demonstrated by those very 9/11 Deniers themselves. Right
here. Repeatedly.
I can only
assume you include yourself in the the 20% to 25% of "scientifically
savvy and alert" Americans, so you should have no problem grasping the
following:
I grasp easily that the 9/11 Denial Movement is not only clueless about
science but have no clue about critical and logical thinking.
Otherwise they wouldn't be making such pathetic asses of themselves,
constantly repeating debunked nonsense and ignoring evidence.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ghidorah" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 03:12:47 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:44:18 -0700, Sky King wrote:
ghidorah wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:13:51 -0700, Sky King wrote:
<snip>
(the bad news about 9/11 deniers continued here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/30/science/30profile.html)
Now that's some concrete evidence you present there, that really clears up
many of the questions concerning 9/11. I really like how it has nothing to
do with 9/11.
That's a hoot. It has everything to do with 9/11 Deniers. Apparently,
you're upset so you must be one of them.
Who said I was upset? Like the implications of the article you presented,
the basis of your statements are based solely on your own assumptions.
Are you implying that anyone who questions the events of
9/11 lack the mental facilities to understand the issue?
It has been demonstrated by those very 9/11 Deniers themselves. Right
here. Repeatedly.
I'm not defending every quack on Usenet wearing a tin-foil hat, but I'm
also not one of them. I just want the questions about 9/11 answered and
the perpetrators of this heinous crime brought to justice. Right now,
there are far more perplexing questions about the events than adequate
answers.
I can only
assume you include yourself in the the 20% to 25% of "scientifically
savvy and alert" Americans, so you should have no problem grasping the
following:
I grasp easily that the 9/11 Denial Movement is not only clueless about
science but have no clue about critical and logical thinking.
If such a logical answer exists and the evidence of such is so
irrefutable, than present it instead of attempting to make some offhanded
personal attack by implying that anyone who doesn't agree with you must
not have the capacity to understand the issue critically and logically.
Otherwise they wouldn't be making such pathetic asses of themselves,
constantly repeating debunked nonsense and ignoring evidence.
Kooks are kooks, no matter what the issue is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sky King" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 06:24:23 PM |
|
|
You must be a newbie here, gibberish.
And you must have never read a single thing about the evidence of what
happened on 9/11.
You idiots are a dime a dozen.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SmirkS" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
31 Aug 2005 08:53:47 AM |
|
|
Lie King posted:
You must be a newbie here, gibberish.
obviously, if they're going to continue arguing 9/11 with you.
--
TheTruthHurts.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ghidorah" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 06:39:33 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:24:23 -0700, Sky King wrote:
You must be a newbie here, gibberish.
And you must have never read a single thing about the evidence of what
happened on 9/11.
You idiots are a dime a dozen.
LOL Great response. What better way to support your argument than childish
name calling.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sky King" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
30 Aug 2005 07:57:33 PM |
|
|
ghidorah wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:24:23 -0700, Sky King wrote:
You must be a newbie here, gibberish.
And you must have never read a single thing about the evidence of what
happened on 9/11.
You idiots are a dime a dozen.
LOL Great response. What better way to support your argument than childish
name calling.
I never bother with "name calling", gibberish.
Read the title of this thread for your education.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Asmodeus" |
|
| Title: New study identifies Sky King's problem as Cognitive dissonance |
31 Aug 2005 02:56:45 AM |
|
|
Sky King wrote:
ghidorah wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:24:23 -0700, Sky King wrote:
You must be a newbie here, gibberish.
And you must have never read a single thing about the evidence of what
happened on 9/11.
You idiots are a dime a dozen.
LOL Great response. What better way to support your argument than childish
name calling.
I never bother with "name calling", gibberish.
Yeh right:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/61e7dfb3c4927b2f?dmode=source&hl=en
"Therefore, the NYT article is about people like you, Smirky.
Have a swell day, loony."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/d2d4699e838df277?dmode=source&hl=en
"You must be a newbie here, gibberish.
And you must have never read a single thing about the evidence of what
happened on 9/11.
You idiots are a dime a dozen."
That's what earned you the moniker of Lie King.
Read the title of this thread for your education.
I agree, particulary the current title of this thread.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SmirkS" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies Sky King's problem as Cognitive dissonance |
31 Aug 2005 08:54:20 AM |
|
|
Asmodeus posted:
I never bother with "name calling", gibberish.
Yeh right:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/61e7dfb3c4927b2f?dmod
e=source&hl=en
"Therefore, the NYT article is about people like you, Smirky.
Have a swell day, loony."
<chuckle>
--
TheTruthHurts.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sky King" |
|
| Title: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
31 Aug 2005 07:35:25 AM |
|
|
Asmodeus wrote:
Sky King wrote:
ghidorah wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:24:23 -0700, Sky King wrote:
You must be a newbie here, gibberish.
And you must have never read a single thing about the evidence of what
happened on 9/11.
You idiots are a dime a dozen.
LOL Great response. What better way to support your argument than childish
name calling.
I never bother with "name calling", gibberish.
Yeh right:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/61e7dfb3c4927b2f?dmode=source&hl=en
"Therefore, the NYT article is about people like you, Smirky.
Have a swell day, loony."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/d2d4699e838df277?dmode=source&hl=en
"You must be a newbie here, gibberish.
And you must have never read a single thing about the evidence of what
happened on 9/11.
You idiots are a dime a dozen."
That's what earned you the moniker of Lie King.
Read the title of this thread for your education.
I agree, particulary the current title of this thread.
Every word I wrote is true. It is not just "name calling."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MuhammadColumbo" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
01 Sep 2005 02:18:29 PM |
|
|
The orderers of 9/11 strikes are USA administration top managers, and the
executing people are US army top secret team using raytheon remote control
technology. For more details, see http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/
"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1125425631.597789.243790@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Scientist at Work | Jon Miller
Scientific Savvy? In U.S., Not Much
.
|
|
|
| User: "george" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
03 Sep 2005 07:43:13 PM |
|
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
The orderers of 9/11 strikes are USA administration top managers, and the
executing people are US army top secret team using raytheon remote control
technology. For more details, see http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/
Your mummy isn't going to like it when she finds out you've been
playing on her computor..
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "MuhammadColumbo" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
04 Sep 2005 02:19:52 PM |
|
|
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1125794593.769273.23170@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
The orderers of 9/11 strikes are USA administration top managers, and the
executing people are US army top secret team using raytheon remote
control
technology. For more details, see http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/
Your mummy isn't going to like it when she finds out you've been
playing on her computor..
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Begin to read and understand that article, then you will have right to
answer. If you don't understand, ask to your mummy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "george" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
04 Sep 2005 03:49:48 PM |
|
|
The article answers every point raised by the claims that an airliner
wasn't flown into the Pentagon.
There were 4 airliners hijacked that day. 3 were flown into targets and
the 4th was bought down by the heroic passengers.
The cellphone traffic from all those aircraft to relatives on the
ground are well known and reported..
Why a French writer with an anti American agenda is more believable
than the people who were there is beyond me!
.
|
|
|
| User: "MuhammadColumbo" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
05 Sep 2005 04:56:43 PM |
|
|
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1125866988.227547.192120@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The article answers every point raised by the claims that an airliner
wasn't flown into the Pentagon.
There were 4 airliners hijacked that day. 3 were flown into targets and
the 4th was bought down by the heroic passengers.
The cellphone traffic from all those aircraft to relatives on the
ground are well known and reported..
Why a French writer with an anti American agenda is more believable
than the people who were there is beyond me!
I am not to be believed. Only evidences can be believed. And if you are able
to think, you are able to find the truth yourself. You don't need to believe
any phone report, nor any conspiracy theorist whoever he can be.
In that case, you can check all relevant evidences in my web site. But for
the phone calls, you can check NOTHING. Because all those calls can be pure
hollywood made. But evidences like take off, deviation and crash times can
not be hided and you can check them in all reports coming from all sources.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sky King" |
|
| Title: Re: New study identifies root problem of the 9/11 Denial Movement: deniers "don't have a clue." |
05 Sep 2005 07:55:06 PM |
|
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a =E9crit dans le message de news:
1125866988.227547.192120@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The article answers every point raised by the claims that an airliner
wasn't flown into the Pentagon.
There were 4 airliners hijacked that day. 3 were flown into targets and
the 4th was bought down by the heroic passengers.
The cellphone traffic from all those aircraft to relatives on the
ground are well known and reported..
Why a French writer with an anti American agenda is more believable
than the people who were there is beyond me!
I am not to be believed.
We already know that, Muhammad. Glad you finally agree.
Only evidences can be believed. And if you are able
to think, you are able to find the truth yourself.
We have, but we wonder why YOU will not accept the truth.
Why is that, Muhammad?
You don't need to believe
any phone report, nor any conspiracy theorist whoever he can be.
Thank you, Muhammad. We have never believed any conspiracy theorist and
certainly not you and your science fiction!
Now, it's time to get back to your studies, Muhammad. Hurry!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
