| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Howard Rothenburg" |
| Date: |
13 Jul 2003 03:56:19 PM |
| Object: |
New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
nypost.com [house.gif] Post Home Delivery
JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK
By BRIAN BLOMQUIST
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[envelope.gif] Email [document.gif] Archives
[printer.gif] Print [c.gif] Reprint
July 12, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - A federal judge helping to rebuild Iraq's judicial system says he's come up with
an intriguing document linking Saddam Hussein to Osama bin Laden.
Federal appellate Judge Gilbert Merritt, who is currently in Iraq, said an Iraqi lawyer brought him documents
that included the name of an Iraqi officer in that country's embassy in Pakistan who was described as
"responsible for the coordination of activities with the Osama bin Laden group."
"It seems to me to be strong proof that the two were in contact and conspiring to perform terrorist acts,"
Merritt, a Democrat and longtime family friend of Al Gore, wrote in a dispatch for The Tennesseean newspaper -
charges similar to those previously reported by The Weekly Standard.
"Until this time, I have been skeptical about these claims," wrote the Cincinnati-based judge. "Now I have
changed my mind."
Merritt, who was sent to Iraq by the Justice Department to help rebuild the country's judiciary, recounted the
strange history of how the intriguing document came to light.
He said an Iraqi lawyer recently brought him a Nov. 14, 2002, edition of a newspaper controlled by Saddam's
sadistic son Uday that included photos of Saddam, bin Laden, and a "List of Honor" - 600 names of "regime
persons," including all 55 of the wanted deck-of-card Iraqis.
The lawyer told Merritt that Uday had published the list to make the men more loyal, but Saddam hit the roof
when he saw it and sent his henchmen to confiscate the newspapers, even going door to door to force people to
turn them over. The lawyer had kept his copy.
On the list was the name of an Iraqi intelligence officer, Abid Al-Karim Muhamed Aswood, who was based in
Pakistan and "responsible for the coordination of activities with the Osama bin Laden group."
Back to: Regional News | National News | World News | Home
[nosmoking.gif] Has your bar or restaurant been fined or warned for having patrons smoke? Give The Post a call
at 212 930-8500 and tell us your story.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
| User: "tom_terrific" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
23 Jul 2003 12:40:16 PM |
|
|
I find it interesting that not one of Bush's detractors posted a reply
to this post, even to discredit it. Must be that they're so afraid of
the truth that they will ignore it in the hopes that nobody else reads
it.
Tom
Howard Rothenburg <hrothenb@bcpl.net> wrote in message news:<Pine.GSO.4.55.0307131651360.7474@mail>...
nypost.com [house.gif] Post Home Delivery
JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK
By BRIAN BLOMQUIST
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[envelope.gif] Email [document.gif] Archives
[printer.gif] Print [c.gif] Reprint
July 12, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - A federal judge helping to rebuild Iraq's judicial system says he's come up with
an intriguing document linking Saddam Hussein to Osama bin Laden.
Federal appellate Judge Gilbert Merritt, who is currently in Iraq, said an Iraqi lawyer brought him documents
that included the name of an Iraqi officer in that country's embassy in Pakistan who was described as
"responsible for the coordination of activities with the Osama bin Laden group."
"It seems to me to be strong proof that the two were in contact and conspiring to perform terrorist acts,"
Merritt, a Democrat and longtime family friend of Al Gore, wrote in a dispatch for The Tennesseean newspaper -
charges similar to those previously reported by The Weekly Standard.
"Until this time, I have been skeptical about these claims," wrote the Cincinnati-based judge. "Now I have
changed my mind."
Merritt, who was sent to Iraq by the Justice Department to help rebuild the country's judiciary, recounted the
strange history of how the intriguing document came to light.
He said an Iraqi lawyer recently brought him a Nov. 14, 2002, edition of a newspaper controlled by Saddam's
sadistic son Uday that included photos of Saddam, bin Laden, and a "List of Honor" - 600 names of "regime
persons," including all 55 of the wanted deck-of-card Iraqis.
The lawyer told Merritt that Uday had published the list to make the men more loyal, but Saddam hit the roof
when he saw it and sent his henchmen to confiscate the newspapers, even going door to door to force people to
turn them over. The lawyer had kept his copy.
On the list was the name of an Iraqi intelligence officer, Abid Al-Karim Muhamed Aswood, who was based in
Pakistan and "responsible for the coordination of activities with the Osama bin Laden group."
Back to: Regional News | National News | World News | Home
[nosmoking.gif] Has your bar or restaurant been fined or warned for having patrons smoke? Give The Post a call
at 212 930-8500 and tell us your story.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
23 Jul 2003 06:41:08 PM |
|
|
"tom_terrific" <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1cd66dcc.0307230940.7829ad45@posting.google.com...
I find it interesting that not one of Bush's detractors posted a reply
to this post, even to discredit it. Must be that they're so afraid of
the truth that they will ignore it in the hopes that nobody else reads
it.
Tom
I'd like to see what the CIA says about its authenticity first. The last
time people walked up to people and revealed "smoking gun" proof of
something was when a reporter in Rome bought some documents about Niger...
--
New definition of irony:
'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of the
'30's and '40's
- they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". '
-Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tom_terrific" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
24 Jul 2003 04:07:26 PM |
|
|
"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:<bfn6eg$ttp$1@slb4.atl.mindspring.net>...
"tom_terrific" <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1cd66dcc.0307230940.7829ad45@posting.google.com...
I find it interesting that not one of Bush's detractors posted a reply
to this post, even to discredit it. Must be that they're so afraid of
the truth that they will ignore it in the hopes that nobody else reads
it.
Tom
I'd like to see what the CIA says about its authenticity first. The last
time people walked up to people and revealed "smoking gun" proof of
something was when a reporter in Rome bought some documents about Niger...
Then why would you want to hear from the CIA . . . you'd just discount
what they said if you didn't like what you heard or you'd crow if they
said what you wanted to hear.
Tom
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
24 Jul 2003 08:10:52 PM |
|
|
"tom_terrific" <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1cd66dcc.0307240537.4a241242@posting.google.com...
"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:<bfn6eg$ttp$1@slb4.atl.mindspring.net>...
"tom_terrific" <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1cd66dcc.0307230940.7829ad45@posting.google.com...
I find it interesting that not one of Bush's detractors posted a reply
to this post, even to discredit it. Must be that they're so afraid of
the truth that they will ignore it in the hopes that nobody else reads
it.
Tom
I'd like to see what the CIA says about its authenticity first. The last
time people walked up to people and revealed "smoking gun" proof of
something was when a reporter in Rome bought some documents about
Niger...
Then why would you want to hear from the CIA . . . you'd just discount
what they said if you didn't like what you heard or you'd crow if they
said what you wanted to hear.
Where did you get that? The CIA has a misinformation dept, true, but that
isn't the intelligence gathering and reporting side...
....well, pre-Bush it wasn't.
--
New definition of irony:
'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of the
'30's and '40's
- they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". '
-Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: ".BitHead." |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
23 Jul 2003 10:10:08 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:41:08 -0700, "Lawson English"
<english7@mindspring.com> wrote:
"tom_terrific" <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1cd66dcc.0307230940.7829ad45@posting.google.com...
I find it interesting that not one of Bush's detractors posted a reply
to this post, even to discredit it. Must be that they're so afraid of
the truth that they will ignore it in the hopes that nobody else reads
it.
Tom
I'd like to see what the CIA says about its authenticity first. The last
time people walked up to people and revealed "smoking gun" proof of
something was when a reporter in Rome bought some documents about Niger...
(Chuckle)
NOW the CIA is relvant, eh?
----
_____________________________________________________________
/BitHead's Place: Political commentary from the REAL world. /\
/ http://home.rochester.rr.com/bitheads/ _/ /\
/Bit's weekly commentaries also available internationally: / \/
/ http://www.rightpoint.ca/ http://clik.to/bithead/ \ /
/ http://greysanctuary.com/columnists/bithead/index.asp /\
__________________________________________________________/ /
\ __________________________________________________________\/
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
23 Jul 2003 10:36:27 PM |
|
|
".BitHead." <bithead@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lejuhv053rnqh9qc73gbnb3onuoo1ilpso@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:41:08 -0700, "Lawson English"
<english7@mindspring.com> wrote:
"tom_terrific" <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1cd66dcc.0307230940.7829ad45@posting.google.com...
I find it interesting that not one of Bush's detractors posted a reply
to this post, even to discredit it. Must be that they're so afraid of
the truth that they will ignore it in the hopes that nobody else reads
it.
Tom
I'd like to see what the CIA says about its authenticity first. The last
time people walked up to people and revealed "smoking gun" proof of
something was when a reporter in Rome bought some documents about
Niger...
(Chuckle)
NOW the CIA is relvant, eh?
When have I said otherwise? Do you live in some odd world where everyone who
disagrees with you is really the same person using a different internet
account?
--
New definition of irony:
'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of the
'30's and '40's
- they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". '
-Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eflorack" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
24 Jul 2003 04:37:42 PM |
|
|
"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:<bfnk7n$kcm$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>...
".BitHead." <bithead@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lejuhv053rnqh9qc73gbnb3onuoo1ilpso@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:41:08 -0700, "Lawson English"
<english7@mindspring.com> wrote:
"tom_terrific" <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1cd66dcc.0307230940.7829ad45@posting.google.com...
I find it interesting that not one of Bush's detractors posted a reply
to this post, even to discredit it. Must be that they're so afraid of
the truth that they will ignore it in the hopes that nobody else reads
it.
Tom
I'd like to see what the CIA says about its authenticity first. The last
time people walked up to people and revealed "smoking gun" proof of
something was when a reporter in Rome bought some documents about
Niger...
(Chuckle)
NOW the CIA is relvant, eh?
When have I said otherwise? Do you live in some odd world where everyone who
disagrees with you is really the same person using a different internet
account?
Not hardly.
But are you really going to deny that the overwhelming leftist
position was that the CIA and other such agencies were less than
desireable?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brooks Gregory" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
24 Jul 2003 04:58:10 PM |
|
|
"eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:bd154db5.0307240601.6b134e08@posting.google.com...
"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:<bfnk7n$kcm$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>...
".BitHead." <bithead@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lejuhv053rnqh9qc73gbnb3onuoo1ilpso@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:41:08 -0700, "Lawson English"
<english7@mindspring.com> wrote:
"tom_terrific" <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1cd66dcc.0307230940.7829ad45@posting.google.com...
I find it interesting that not one of Bush's detractors posted a
reply
to this post, even to discredit it. Must be that they're so afraid
of
the truth that they will ignore it in the hopes that nobody else
reads
it.
Tom
I'd like to see what the CIA says about its authenticity first. The
last
time people walked up to people and revealed "smoking gun" proof of
something was when a reporter in Rome bought some documents about
Niger...
(Chuckle)
NOW the CIA is relvant, eh?
When have I said otherwise? Do you live in some odd world where everyone
who
disagrees with you is really the same person using a different internet
account?
Not hardly.
But are you really going to deny that the overwhelming leftist
position was that the CIA and other such agencies were less than
desireable?
I thiink this is one of those Rove Gotchas he has in his pocket for use at a
later date. There have been several other references to other connections in
"The Economist" magazine and I can not for the life of me understand why
this administration has not used them to their political advantage. Some of
the references, it is pretty obvious they are authentic and valid.
--
A lot of little boys never grow up.
They just change the name of
their game from "Cowboys and
Indians" to "Democrats and Republicans"
Brooks Gregory
www.campaignline.com
www.theaapc.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
24 Jul 2003 08:25:11 PM |
|
|
"Brooks Gregory" <brooks@swbtnet.com> wrote in message
news:oBYTa.1593$jW.1486@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com...
"eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:bd154db5.0307240601.6b134e08@posting.google.com...
"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:<bfnk7n$kcm$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>...
".BitHead." <bithead@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
(Chuckle)
NOW the CIA is relvant, eh?
When have I said otherwise? Do you live in some odd world where
everyone
who
disagrees with you is really the same person using a different
internet
account?
Not hardly.
But are you really going to deny that the overwhelming leftist
position was that the CIA and other such agencies were less than
desireable?
I thiink this is one of those Rove Gotchas he has in his pocket for use at
a
later date. There have been several other references to other connections
in
"The Economist" magazine and I can not for the life of me understand why
this administration has not used them to their political advantage. Some
of
the references, it is pretty obvious they are authentic and valid.
Maybe there IS specific information that establishes an Saddam-9/11
connection. If there is, it completely contradicts the congressional report
that was just released today where it is claimed that there is no specific
information about such a link. And if Saddam didn't have anything to do with
9/11, I doubt if he had much contact with OBL at all.
BTW, I was in the USAF for 5 years. I hated almost every second of my time
there, and I was truely dismayed by some of the tactics I saw used by the
OSI (including against me), but I wouldn't claim that those tactics were
uncalled for, given the circumstances, just that they are very open to
abuse.
Likewise, the CIA's job, however repugnant it may be at times, and however
often individuals may "cross the line" in performing their job, is still
essential for our country's security. The point of oversight of the CIA
isn't to hamstring it, but to help it to do its job without becoming a tool
for fulfilling private agendas in the government, as has been the case with
the FBI and likely has been and often will be the case with both the FBI and
CIA in the future. We can't completely stamp out corruption and abuse -we
can only try to keep it at least slightly under control. Beware the
demagogues who stride into power proclaiming that THEIRS will be the
ultimate moral and ethical administration because they know damn well that
they're lying from the getgo. The best we can hope for are people that don't
let agendas and corruption get TOO far out of control.
--
New definition of irony:
'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of the
'30's and '40's
- they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". '
-Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brooks Gregory" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
25 Jul 2003 06:40:39 AM |
|
|
"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:bfq0tg$md$1@slb2.atl.mindspring.net...
"Brooks Gregory" <brooks@swbtnet.com> wrote in message
news:oBYTa.1593$jW.1486@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com...
"eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:bd154db5.0307240601.6b134e08@posting.google.com...
"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:<bfnk7n$kcm$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>...
".BitHead." <bithead@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
(Chuckle)
NOW the CIA is relvant, eh?
When have I said otherwise? Do you live in some odd world where
everyone
who
disagrees with you is really the same person using a different
internet
account?
Not hardly.
But are you really going to deny that the overwhelming leftist
position was that the CIA and other such agencies were less than
desireable?
I thiink this is one of those Rove Gotchas he has in his pocket for use
at
a
later date. There have been several other references to other
connections
in
"The Economist" magazine and I can not for the life of me understand why
this administration has not used them to their political advantage. Some
of
the references, it is pretty obvious they are authentic and valid.
Maybe there IS specific information that establishes an Saddam-9/11
connection. If there is, it completely contradicts the congressional
report
that was just released today where it is claimed that there is no
specific
information about such a link. And if Saddam didn't have anything to do
with
9/11, I doubt if he had much contact with OBL at all.
BTW, I was in the USAF for 5 years. I hated almost every second of my time
there, and I was truely dismayed by some of the tactics I saw used by the
OSI (including against me), but I wouldn't claim that those tactics were
uncalled for, given the circumstances, just that they are very open to
abuse.
Small world. I was in the OSI in Peshawar in 1960.
Likewise, the CIA's job, however repugnant it may be at times, and however
often individuals may "cross the line" in performing their job, is still
essential for our country's security. The point of oversight of the CIA
isn't to hamstring it, but to help it to do its job without becoming a
tool
for fulfilling private agendas in the government, as has been the case
with
the FBI and likely has been and often will be the case with both the FBI
and
CIA in the future. We can't completely stamp out corruption and abuse -we
can only try to keep it at least slightly under control. Beware the
demagogues who stride into power proclaiming that THEIRS will be the
ultimate moral and ethical administration because they know damn well that
they're lying from the getgo. The best we can hope for are people that
don't
let agendas and corruption get TOO far out of control.
--
New definition of irony:
'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of
the
'30's and '40's
- they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". '
-Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter.
I bet you would be surprised to learn the judge that made the link is one of
Al Gore's best friends. Some people just realize that this is about America,
not party loyalty.
--
A lot of little boys never grow up.
They just change the name of
their game from "Cowboys and
Indians" to "Democrats and Republicans"
Brooks Gregory
www.campaignline.com
www.theaapc.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
25 Jul 2003 10:51:04 AM |
|
|
"Brooks Gregory" <brooks@swbtnet.com> wrote in message news:f19Ua.3475
[...]
I bet you would be surprised to learn the judge that made the link is one
of
Al Gore's best friends. Some people just realize that this is about
America,
not party loyalty.
Why would I care? I'm neither a registered democrat or registered
republican.
Again: I'd like to see the CIA or other intelligence group's "unbiased"
assessment of the evidence and what it means.
--
New definition of irony:
'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of the
'30's and '40's
- they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". '
-Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "eflorack" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
25 Jul 2003 08:30:12 AM |
|
|
"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:<bfq0tg$md$1@slb2.atl.mindspring.net>...
BTW, I was in the USAF for 5 years. I hated almost every second of my time
there, and I was truely dismayed by some of the tactics I saw used by the
OSI (including against me),
(BitHEad perks....)
but I wouldn't claim that those tactics were
uncalled for, given the circumstances, just that they are very open to
abuse.
So too are most thing government is involved with. Which, in turn, is
why so many people were concerned about Bill Clinton.
Likewise, the CIA's job, however repugnant it may be at times, and however
often individuals may "cross the line" in performing their job, is still
essential for our country's security. The point of oversight of the CIA
isn't to hamstring it, but to help it to do its job without becoming a tool
for fulfilling private agendas in the government, as has been the case with
the FBI and likely has been and often will be the case with both the FBI and
CIA in the future. We can't completely stamp out corruption and abuse -we
can only try to keep it at least slightly under control.
But here's the rub; if the CIA at it's level of power is ripe for
abuse, what of those set in power over them such as 'oversight'
groups? Think you that these are immune to abuse, regardless of what
their stated purpose is?
Beware the
demagogues who stride into power proclaiming that THEIRS will be the
ultimate moral and ethical administration because they know damn well that
they're lying from the getgo.
Point of order, and as a backing of my earlier comment; Didn't Bill
Clinton make such a claim?
The best we can hope for are people that don't
let agendas and corruption get TOO far out of control.
Or, at the least that the agendae are ones that do not run afoul of
OUR agendae.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: ".BitHead." |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
24 Jul 2003 08:23:31 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:58:10 -0500, "Brooks Gregory"
<brooks@swbtnet.com> wrote:
"eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:bd154db5.0307240601.6b134e08@posting.google.com...
"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:<bfnk7n$kcm$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>...
".BitHead." <bithead@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lejuhv053rnqh9qc73gbnb3onuoo1ilpso@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:41:08 -0700, "Lawson English"
<english7@mindspring.com> wrote:
"tom_terrific" <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1cd66dcc.0307230940.7829ad45@posting.google.com...
I find it interesting that not one of Bush's detractors posted a
reply
to this post, even to discredit it. Must be that they're so afraid
of
the truth that they will ignore it in the hopes that nobody else
reads
it.
Tom
I'd like to see what the CIA says about its authenticity first. The
last
time people walked up to people and revealed "smoking gun" proof of
something was when a reporter in Rome bought some documents about
Niger...
(Chuckle)
NOW the CIA is relvant, eh?
When have I said otherwise? Do you live in some odd world where everyone
who
disagrees with you is really the same person using a different internet
account?
Not hardly.
But are you really going to deny that the overwhelming leftist
position was that the CIA and other such agencies were less than
desireable?
I thiink this is one of those Rove Gotchas he has in his pocket for use at a
later date. There have been several other references to other connections in
"The Economist" magazine and I can not for the life of me understand why
this administration has not used them to their political advantage. Some of
the references, it is pretty obvious they are authentic and valid.
Because once the mouse trap has been spring, it's not of much use.
----
_____________________________________________________________
/BitHead's Place: Political commentary from the REAL world. /\
/ http://home.rochester.rr.com/bitheads/ _/ /\
/Bit's weekly commentaries also available internationally: / \/
/ http://www.rightpoint.ca/ http://clik.to/bithead/ \ /
/ http://greysanctuary.com/columnists/bithead/index.asp /\
__________________________________________________________/ /
\ __________________________________________________________\/
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
.
|
|
|
| User: "banjocat" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
26 Jul 2003 09:22:15 AM |
|
|
..BitHead. <bithead@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message news:<ci11ivcgjp89kj9t2kcchrsajvm4t6qtha@4ax.com>...
Because once the mouse trap has been spring, it's not of much use.
"spring"?
Since you've been lecturing me on grammar, you'd better check your own
post from now on, punk.
Remember that you started this *grammar* flame war. Live with it,
jackass.
"The mind boggles.... someone who doesn't know the differece
between "their", "they're", and "there", and someone who as a matter
of routine defends someone who tried to re-define the word "is",
attempting to one-up someone over the meanings of words." says,
bithead/eflorack/zola, obviously not knowing the difference between
*between* and *among*.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eflorack" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
26 Jul 2003 01:48:21 PM |
|
|
(banjocat) wrote in message news:<de641e5b.0307260622.ddf5aac@posting.google.com>...
.BitHead. <bithead@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message news:<ci11ivcgjp89kj9t2kcchrsajvm4t6qtha@4ax.com>...
Because once the mouse trap has been spring, it's not of much use.
"spring"?
Since you've been lecturing me on grammar, you'd better check your own
post from now on, punk.
Another example of Selwyn making something out of nothing.
Hint: Look at your keyboard, you moron.
If you look really close and check your 1st grad reader, you may
notice the I directly next to the U.... See it there?
What kind of chance do you suppose that what you're trying to push as
a gramatical error is simply a *typo*?
Remember that you started this *grammar* flame war. Live with it,
jackass.
No. I simply responded to it. You're just pissed because I slapped you
back as usual.
"The mind boggles.... someone who doesn't know the differece
between "their", "they're", and "there", and someone who as a matter
of routine defends someone who tried to re-define the word "is",
attempting to one-up someone over the meanings of words." says,
bithead/eflorack/zola, obviously not knowing the difference between
*between* and *among*.
Given you obviously missed the real cause here, my statement holds.
You're still a proven liar, and just now, you've proven yourself to be
a vicious, petty fool, as well.
Nice going, Selwyn.
Don't you ever learn?
.
|
|
|
| User: "banjocat" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
26 Jul 2003 07:38:36 PM |
|
|
(eflorack) wrote in message news:<bd154db5.0307261048.7d39a33b@posting.google.com>...
banjocat@bellsouth.net (banjocat) wrote in message news:<de641e5b.0307260622.ddf5aac@posting.google.com>...
.BitHead. <bithead@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message news:<ci11ivcgjp89kj9t2kcchrsajvm4t6qtha@4ax.com>...
Because once the mouse trap has been spring, it's not of much use.
"spring"?
Since you've been lecturing me on grammar, you'd better check your own
post from now on, punk.
Another example of Selwyn making something out of nothing.
Hint: Look at your keyboard, you moron.
If you look really close and check your 1st grad reader, you may
notice the I directly next to the U.... See it there?
What kind of chance do you suppose that what you're trying to push as
a gramatical error is simply a *typo*?
Remember that you started this *grammar* flame war. Live with it,
jackass.
No. I simply responded to it. You're just pissed because I slapped you
back as usual.
You *started* it, liar. See the paragraph directly below.
"The mind boggles.... someone who doesn't know the differece
between "their", "they're", and "there", and someone who as a matter
of routine defends someone who tried to re-define the word "is",
attempting to one-up someone over the meanings of words." says,
bithead/eflorack/zola, obviously not knowing the difference between
*between* and *among*.
Given you obviously missed the real cause here, my statement holds.
You're still a proven liar, and just now, you've proven yourself to be
a vicious, petty fool, as well.
LOL... When YOU make a grammar mistake, you demand a pass... Got it, hypocrite.
Nice going, Selwyn.
Don't you ever learn?
.
|
|
|
| User: "banjocat" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
27 Jul 2003 10:56:27 AM |
|
|
On 27 Jul 2003 06:48:24 -0700, (eflorack)
wrote:
banjocat@bellsouth.net (banjocat) wrote in message news:<de641e5b.0307261638.50300aa6@posting.google.com>...
If you look really close and check your 1st grad reader, you may
notice the I directly next to the U.... See it there?
What kind of chance do you suppose that what you're trying to push as
a gramatical error is simply a *typo*?
Remember that you started this *grammar* flame war. Live with it,
jackass.
No. I simply responded to it. You're just pissed because I slapped you
back as usual.
You *started* it, liar. See the paragraph directly below.
"The mind boggles.... someone who doesn't know the differece
between "their", "they're", and "there", and someone who as a matter
of routine defends someone who tried to re-define the word "is",
attempting to one-up someone over the meanings of words." says,
bithead/eflorack/zola, obviously not knowing the difference between
*between* and *among*.
That wasn't the start of the argument.
Pay attention, moron. You started the grammar flaming.
What's laughable is that you provided your own grammar error in that
flame. LOL...
That was just the point at which you *lost* the argument.
The argumented was concerning Bondummy's recent lie.
You diverted the discussion with a silly grammar flame.
Now, that you've failed in your little distraction, cite where
I claimed there was an implied "never" in bondummy's statement.
Can't do it, can you, punk?
.
|
|
|
| User: "eflorack" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
04 Aug 2003 10:11:54 AM |
|
|
banjocat <banjocat@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:<s4t7ivsberrj11760bfle4dpsqbpaak3vr@4ax.com>...
On 27 Jul 2003 06:48:24 -0700, (eflorack)
wrote:
banjocat@bellsouth.net (banjocat) wrote in message news:<de641e5b.0307261638.50300aa6@posting.google.com>...
If you look really close and check your 1st grad reader, you may
notice the I directly next to the U.... See it there?
What kind of chance do you suppose that what you're trying to push as
a gramatical error is simply a *typo*?
Remember that you started this *grammar* flame war. Live with it,
jackass.
No. I simply responded to it. You're just pissed because I slapped you
back as usual.
You *started* it, liar. See the paragraph directly below.
"The mind boggles.... someone who doesn't know the differece
between "their", "they're", and "there", and someone who as a matter
of routine defends someone who tried to re-define the word "is",
attempting to one-up someone over the meanings of words." says,
bithead/eflorack/zola, obviously not knowing the difference between
*between* and *among*.
That wasn't the start of the argument.
Pay attention, moron. You started the grammar flaming.
Pay attention yourself, Twerp. You got back what you fired at me.
What's laughable is that you provided your own grammar error in that
flame. LOL...
That was just the point at which you *lost* the argument.
The argumented was concerning Bondummy's recent lie.
You diverted the discussion with a silly grammar flame.
Now, that you've failed in your little distraction, cite where
I claimed there was an implied "never" in bondummy's statement.
The claim was implied when you proceeded to point up the reletive few
instances as 'proof' of your false claim that he lied. Without that
point being implied, your arguemnt has no substance at all.
Which would be normal, for you, anwyay.
.
|
|
|
| User: "banjocat" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Post: JUDGE FINDS OSAMA-SADDAM LINK |
04 Aug 2003 06:32:58 PM |
|
|
(eflorack) wrote in message news:<bd154db5.0308040711.5a1a0dc5@posting.google.com>...
banjocat <banjocat@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:<s4t7ivsberrj11760bfle4dpsqbpaak3vr@4ax.com>...
On 27 Jul 2003 06:48:24 -0700, (eflorack)
wrote:
banjocat@bellsouth.net (banjocat) wrote in message news:<de641e5b.0307261638.50300aa6@posting.google.com>...
If you look really close and check your 1st grad reader, you may
notice the I directly next to the U.... See it there?
What kind of chance do you suppose that what you're trying to push as
a gramatical error is simply a *typo*?
Remember that you started this *grammar* flame war. Live with it,
jackass.
No. I simply responded to it. You're just pissed because I slapped you
back as usual.
You *started* it, liar. See the paragraph directly below.
"The mind boggles.... someone who doesn't know the differece
between "their", "they're", and "there", and someone who as a matter
of routine defends someone who tried to re-define the word "is",
attempting to one-up someone over the meanings of words." says,
bithead/eflorack/zola, obviously not knowing the difference between
*between* and *among*.
That wasn't the start of the argument.
Pay attention, moron. You started the grammar flaming.
Pay attention yourself, Twerp. You got back what you fired at me.
Wrong again, liar... I've cited where you started it.
What's laughable is that you provided your own grammar error in that
flame. LOL...
That was just the point at which you *lost* the argument.
The argumented was concerning Bondummy's recent lie.
You diverted the discussion with a silly grammar flame.
Now, that you've failed in your little distraction, cite where
I claimed there was an implied "never" in bondummy's statement.
The claim was implied when you proceeded to point up the reletive few
instances as 'proof' of your false claim that he lied. Without that
point being implied, your arguemnt has no substance at all.
LOL... You couldn't back up your ***** claim, that I claimed an
"implied" never so, you shoot for an "implied" "implied". You really
are the idiot, aren't you, zolanasty?
Which would be normal, for you, anwyay.
Thanks for providing the laugh of the day with your claim of an
"implied" "implied", fool.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
