| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"BigBushMandate" |
| Date: |
12 Nov 2004 02:51:13 PM |
| Object: |
New York Times circulation FLAT! Liberals being REJECTED! |
The New York Times used to be a decent newspaper, but it has now become
little more than the house organ for the DNC. As a consequence, its
circulation numbers are now FLAT. Same thing happened to the liberal Boston
Globe, whose parent company is the leftist New York Times.
Liberals are being REJECTED!
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashnp.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Croatoan" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Times circulation FLAT! Liberals being REJECTED! |
12 Nov 2004 04:42:57 PM |
|
|
In article <5n9ld.24983$KJ6.23235@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"BigBushMandate" <Dems@Nowhere.com> wrote:
The New York Times used to be a decent newspaper, but it has now become
little more than the house organ for the DNC. As a consequence, its
circulation numbers are now FLAT. Same thing happened to the liberal Boston
Globe, whose parent company is the leftist New York Times.
Liberals are being REJECTED!
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashnp.htm
There are times when a newspaper will lower its circulation on purpose.
They get 2/3 or their revenue from ads.
Can't say why it is lower unless you are in the board room.
--
http://www.employees.org/~croatoan/
.
|
|
|
| User: "ChiefJusticeThomas" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Times circulation FLAT! Liberals being REJECTED! |
12 Nov 2004 04:58:59 PM |
|
|
"Croatoan" <croatoan@employees.org> wrote in message
news:R%ald.268$iI2.4546@twister.southeast.rr.com...
In article <5n9ld.24983$KJ6.23235@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"BigBushMandate" <Dems@Nowhere.com> wrote:
The New York Times used to be a decent newspaper, but it has now become
little more than the house organ for the DNC. As a consequence, its
circulation numbers are now FLAT. Same thing happened to the liberal
Boston
Globe, whose parent company is the leftist New York Times.
Liberals are being REJECTED!
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashnp.htm
There are times when a newspaper will lower its circulation on purpose.
They get 2/3 or their revenue from ads.
Can't say why it is lower unless you are in the board room.
Wrong again. We CAN say why it is lower for the liberal New York Times and
higher for the unbiased New York Post - it is because liberals are being
REJECTED!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roedy Green" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Times circulation FLAT! Liberals being REJECTED! |
12 Nov 2004 03:48:45 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:51:13 GMT, "BigBushMandate" <Dems@Nowhere.com>
wrote or quoted :
The New York Times used to be a decent newspaper, but it has now become
little more than the house organ for the DNC. As a consequence, its
circulation numbers are now FLAT. Same thing happened to the liberal Boston
Globe, whose parent company is the leftist New York Times.
Liberals are being REJECTED!
You will find that true of all traditional newspapers. TV and tabloid
newspapers are taking over. News is not news. It is propaganda and
entertainment.
see http://mindprod.com/election.html for how Bush stole the 2004
election and ended the great American experiment in democracy.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
See http://mindprod.com/iraq.html photos of Bush's war crimes
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Flip Flopper" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Times circulation FLAT! Liberals being REJECTED! |
12 Nov 2004 03:06:24 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:51:13 GMT, "BigBushMandate" <Dems@Nowhere.com>
wrote:
The New York Times used to be a decent newspaper, but it has now become
little more than the house organ for the DNC. As a consequence, its
circulation numbers are now FLAT. Same thing happened to the liberal Boston
Globe, whose parent company is the leftist New York Times.
Liberals are being REJECTED!
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashnp.htm
As much as I'd like to see the NY Times die, I think fewer people are
reading newspapers due to the Internet and cable news networks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BigBushMandate" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Times circulation FLAT! Liberals being REJECTED! |
12 Nov 2004 04:07:56 PM |
|
|
"Flip Flopper" <Kerry@Atrocities.org> wrote in message
news:mc9ap01tld7ga1o3p9dnrrc1jh8thmn10s@4ax.com...
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:51:13 GMT, "BigBushMandate" <Dems@Nowhere.com>
wrote:
The New York Times used to be a decent newspaper, but it has now become
little more than the house organ for the DNC. As a consequence, its
circulation numbers are now FLAT. Same thing happened to the liberal
Boston
Globe, whose parent company is the leftist New York Times.
Liberals are being REJECTED!
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashnp.htm
As much as I'd like to see the NY Times die, I think fewer people are
reading newspapers due to the Internet and cable news networks.
No, because USA Today is UP 2.8% and New York Post is UP 5.2%! Liberals
are being REJECTED!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wolfram" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Times circulation FLAT! Liberals being REJECTED! |
12 Nov 2004 03:07:59 PM |
|
|
What kind of a statistician are you?
The NY Times and the Boston Globe are up 0.2%,
but
4. Los Angeles Times, 902,164, down 5.6 percent
5. New York Daily News, 715,052, down 1.6 percent
6. The Washington Post, 707,690, down 3 percent
8. Chicago Tribune, 600,988, down 2 percent
10. San Francisco Chronicle, 468,370, down 8.5 percent
12. The Arizona Republic, 413,268, down 4.4 percent
13. The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J., 400,042, down 2.1 percent
17. The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, 354,309, down 3 percent
18. Detroit Free Press, 348,838, down 1.1 percent
19. The San Diego Union-Tribune, 339,032, down 3.7 percent
This just means that newspapers have a hard time in general and you just do
not get the numbers right.
"BigBushMandate" <Dems@Nowhere.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:5n9ld.24983$KJ6.23235@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
The New York Times used to be a decent newspaper, but it has now become
little more than the house organ for the DNC. As a consequence, its
circulation numbers are now FLAT. Same thing happened to the liberal
Boston
Globe, whose parent company is the leftist New York Times.
Liberals are being REJECTED!
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashnp.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "BigBushMandate" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Times circulation FLAT! Liberals being REJECTED! |
12 Nov 2004 04:05:56 PM |
|
|
"Wolfram" <elias@web.in-berlin.de> wrote in message
news:1100293671.760868@elch.in-berlin.de...
What kind of a statistician are you?
What kind are you?
The NY Times and the Boston Globe are up 0.2%,
As I said, FLAT circulation numbers. You sound dense.
This just means that newspapers have a hard time in general and you just
do not get the numbers right.
No, it does NOT mean that because OTHER newspapers, ones that are BALANCED
rather than left wing like the New York Times is, papers such as the New
York Post and USA Today, are INCREASING their circulation numbers! You
sound dense.
"BigBushMandate" <Dems@Nowhere.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:5n9ld.24983$KJ6.23235@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
The New York Times used to be a decent newspaper, but it has now become
little more than the house organ for the DNC. As a consequence, its
circulation numbers are now FLAT. Same thing happened to the liberal
Boston
Globe, whose parent company is the leftist New York Times.
Liberals are being REJECTED!
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashnp.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "soxfan" |
|
| Title: Re: New York Times circulation FLAT! Liberals being REJECTED! |
12 Nov 2004 04:27:27 PM |
|
|
"BigBushMandate" <Dems@Nowhere.com> wrote in message
No, it does NOT mean that because OTHER newspapers, ones that are BALANCED
rather than left wing like the New York Times is, papers such as the New
York Post and USA Today, are INCREASING their circulation numbers! You
sound dense.
holy *****...... Drudge and the NY Post?? you don't call yourself
informed do you?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
