"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:661Mg.18304$lk6.12927@tornado.southeast.rr.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:edq328$941$1@news.albasani.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:l6_Lg.15420$lk6.14526@tornado.southeast.rr.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:edpmlr$phu$1@news.albasani.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:YRXLg.13544$lk6.7955@tornado.southeast.rr.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:edp8lh$2ui$1@news.albasani.net...
Isn't it true that nothing from the first "Contract on America" ever
was passed into law? So why bother making proposals that you aren't
serious about?
Make English the Official Language of Government.
Nope - unless people can be jailed for not speaking English correctly.
Next time Bush says "gonna", "wanna" or "terrist" off to the slammer
he goes!
YES! We don't need forms in every language. If you want to live
here, you must assimulate to english. If you don't, you don't belong
here.
Amd if you can't pronounce words correctly (that means you South and New
Jersey!) we have a nice cell waiting for you!
what the ***** are you talking about? local dialetics are not
languages.
English ONLY! That's IT! If you can't speak ENGLISH than it's JAIL FOR
YOU.
What are you - soft on non-English speakers? Maybe you're some COMMIE
PINKO TERRORIST LOVING ATHIEST?
Go back to Russia you commie!!!
again, *****, where does it say if you use slang you go to jail.
Where does jail ever appear in that part?
Just like a lib, make up lies and hope nobody notices.
Keep God in the Pledge.
Better yet, get rid of "the Pledge" - it's a meaningless waste of
time. Congress croaks "the Pledge" every damned day and they still do
a terrible job.
Better yet, keep god in the pledge and if you don't want to recite it,
you don't have to.
Waste of time - the "Pledge" doesn't accomplish anything.
Require a Voter ID Card.
Meaningless and not needed.
Because it means that democrats have a easier time to cheat.
Repeal the Death Tax, for Good.
There is no "death tax" - nobody is taxed for dying. Newt must be a
moron!
you libs call it the silver spoon tax.
There is no "death tax" or "silver spoon tax".
stick your finger in the *****, little boy blue.
I'm male so the ***** wouldn't appreciate it.
BTW - when will Republicans cut spending so we can ACTUALLY AFFORD a tax
cut?
Are you come COMMIE?
GO BACK TO RUSSIA COMMIE!
It means that when someone dies, instead of their property or
bussinesses going to their heirs, there is a 50% to be paid to the
goverment. It means family bussinesses and farms are sold to pay for
it. It needs to go!
Are there examples of "family farms" or "family businesses" that had to
be sold to pay an inheritance tax? I've not heard of that happening.
It does happen. Just because you don't believe it doesn't mean you are
right.
AGAIN - do you have some examples or not?
I'm still waiting, and I'm betting you have no examples.
Waiting
waiting
waiting
AND YOU STILL HAVE NOTHING!
Restore Property Rights.
And privacy rights - no more mandatory drug tests, no more arresting
people for behavior that harms nobody but the person who does it.
apples and oranges. Two differnt things.
I'm just making a suggestion - neither business or government has any
right to make anyone pee in a cup and be "tested". Anyone who believes
in limited government knows this.
YES THEY DO!!! I don't want a high truck driver on the same road as I
am on!
Too frigging late. Truck drivers are constantly driving without enough
sleep, which is worse than being high.
Or a airline pilot with diabetes that he doesn't know he has yet, god
forbid he were to pass out with low blood sugar while on the air.
Which has what to do with what? Most jobs that require drug tests don't
merit them. Who the F does it matter to if the guy who stocks bluejeans in
Wal-Mart gets stoned after work? Why is it OK for people to get drunk
outside of work but it's the company's business if you get stoned after
work?
Oh, that's right - you conservatives love to submit to authority - it must
be that extra X chromosome you all carry.
why don't disband all police and let live.
Disbanding police would be foolish. I'd rather police were trying to
catch murderers, thieves and people who out CIA agents than bothering
hippies smoling pot.
Achieve Sustainable Energy Independence.
As if you could trust Republicans to handle energy policy!
LOL
Better than we can trust dems. Their solution is a 'windfall tax'.
The Republicans have never in my life been interested in sustainable
energy outside of "pump more oil".
And dems think the solution is MORE TAXES!
It might take taxes to pay for research. You get what you pay for.
Control Spending and Balance the Budget.
That's easy - elect Democrats. Republicans have proven they can't
balance the budget or control spending.
You are kidding
Just looking at the facts man.
I have!
when Reagan got a agreement with Tip O'Neil about tax cuts and cut
spending, more money got to the coffers and Tip and company spent all
that money.
Never heard that tale. I do know that Reagan ran against Carter's $30
Billion deficits, than Reagan ran up $250 billion deficits. Reagan
didn't have the stones to veto a spending bill, Clinton did. Not the
Democrats fault that Reagan was a *****.
Because you can't see past what Howard Dean tells you.
I see you're surrendering on that point too. Reagan was a ***** who only
knew how to tax, borrow and spend.
Tie Education Funding to Teacher Accountability.
Nope - that's one of those "easy answers to complex questions". Of
course Newt knows nothing about education so he has no business
offering "solutions".
BECAUSE THE CURRENT SYSTEM WORKS SO WELL OF JUST THROWING MONEY AT THE
PROBLEM!
There needs to be accountablilty, it's as simple as that.
The feds don't give that much money to education in the first place.
Education is done my local government. The Feds ought to give them more
money and localities can figure out how best to spend it. Not all
solutions come from inside the beltway Newt. I know you all think
Washington DC knows how to do everything better than anyone else, but
outside the beltway we think you might be wrong.
My mom is a teacher. I have read her texts, they are idiotic! She is
forced to pass kids that have no knowledge of the material they were to
learn! THE REASON IS SO IT WILL BE SOMEOTHER SCHOOLS PROBLEM!
How is that a FEDERAL problem? I have numerous relatives who have taught
or are teaching in the NC school system. Nobody is forced to pass kids who
don't know the material. Education is a local issue.
Defend America From the Irreconcilable Wing of Islam
Clinton was doing that when all you guys could do was focus on where
Clinton's penis had been spending it's spare time. Terrorism is only a
problem when you have a political party that doesn't take it
seriously - like the Republicans!
LOL
And remember children, if it weren't for the evil republicans and their
hatred of blow jobs
Republicans love blowjobs. Newt used to get them from his staffers when
he was speaker.
, Bill Clinton would have caught Osama by himself and we would know
peace!
Why didn't Bush do anything about the threat of terrorism?
LOL
Watch the road to 9/11 or do you think that is just a bunch of lies.
I don't watch much TV, and I never watch network television. Docu-dramas
are for chicks and Network ***** is for people who don't know how to read -
which are you?
Focus on Iran and North Korea. The American people are very prepared
to believe we face extraordinary threats from a nuclear North Korea
and an Iranian regime actively seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
Any actions in Iraq need to be recast in terms of their impact on
Iran. A weak America in Iraq will be unable to stop Iran. Stopping
Iran is potentially literally a matter of life and death. Congress
should hold hearings on the scale of the Iranian and North Korean
threat, the statements of their key leaders and the requirements for
action to replace these dictatorships before they succeed in killing
millions of Americans. The Santorum Iranian democracy bill should be
forced out of the Senate in the context of these threats. Everything
about Iraq should be debated within this larger and much more
dangerous context.
Had to leave that last paragraph intact just because every word is so
fucking stupid. Why should the Iranians be interested in giving up
nukes when our policy is to replace their government?
assholesaywhat?
Please be clear.
You surrender on that question is duly noted.
If nothing they can do will appease the Americans, why do anything?
So Iran and NK with nukes don't scare you?
I thought your anti-missile shield would protect the USA! You mean it
doesn't work worth *****? How many hundred billion dollars did we toss
down the drain on that one?
Nukes in the hands of the Iranians doesn't scare me - I don't scurry
around being afraid of the world like you Republicans do. The Iranians
aren't going to nuke the USA - they like living as much as we do. Aside
from that, what can we do about it now? Bush has shown the world that
the USA is a paper tiger - we can't even secure 3rd world backwaters
like Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush has made America look weaker than
President Carter ever did!
So Iran and NK iwht nukes don't scare you!
Not really. Iran is no where near having nukes, and they have no ability
or reason to send them at the USA. Ever hear of deterance? During the COld
War we had to worry about the Soviets and their thousands of nukes were
aimed at us for decades. We didn't ***** our pants over it. I guess your
generation is a bit yellow.
it does me.
That's why you're a Republican. Conservatives and Republicans like to
follow leaders around like good little sheep. Your typical Republican
slinks around with his tail between his ***** covered legs, quivering and
shivering at any sudden noise or new idea.
They know that Republicans have so weakened the US military they have
nothing to fear outside a few missiles.
idiot
Your side has made it so we are no longer a serious threat to Iran -
great job Brownie!
Coming from the side that has constantly voted against developing
almost every military weapon and veihicle for the past 30 years!
Examples?
Didn't think you had any!
LOL
Zell Miller had some in his 2004 Repubilcan National Convention speech.
Really? I didn't watch the Republican convention. Maybe you could provide
some examples. From what I understand he counted any vote against an
appropriation bill as a series of votes against countless individual
weapons systems. So why don't you back up your ***** and show how the
Democrats in congress have, in mass, voted against every military system
and vehicle for the past 30 years.
Maybe you'll finally back up your claims?
Have a nice afternoon!
Hope you get nut cancer and die!
How "culture of life" of you!
.
