Turin wrote:

Some coward, using a throwaway account, disguising his IP address, using
X-no-archive, and calling himself, "Baldwin" <baldwinpark8@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Turin wrote:

One world government is going right on schedule.
Call it "New World Order" if it makes you feel better.


Yep. My man, Albert Pike, had it right. Say goodbye to your
holes, Midwest maggots.....Southern scum...folksy trash. Wave to the
rest of your *****, self-styled "Americana", too. And, get out
that VOTE! hahaha

.....Civilization is finally coming for you scruffy low-lives.

And America is still far better than your pinko *****. Pinkos are terrorists and
sub-human savages like the Islamic extremists are. America is here to stay.

Nice soundbites, Stupid. Did you Google each one, while you could've
been d/ling more video games? Or, were you doing a little more deep
reading at www.McCarthys1950s.com? ...More proof that the real America
(not to mention, the rest of the world) has evolved another ten IQ
points past the breeders.

LOL Turin.

Yeah. We've got some nice internment-camps for you genetic
deficiencies, where you'll also be able to play with your spud guns
during structured playtime. ....later, *****......

That will probably be the best place for them. After Bush finishes
betraying his precious conservatives they're not going to be too happy
and might start using bad language everywhere they go. It will be fun
to watch them thrash but it will be more fun to see them behind do it
behind barbed wire fences LOLOL!

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/090706N.shtml


*Election 2006 & World War III*
By Robert Parry
Consortium News

Thursday 07 September 2006

As Americans go to the polls in two months, they should have one
thought fixed in their minds: they will be voting on whether to
commit the nation to fighting World War III against large segments of
the world's one billion Muslims. Beyond the cost in blood and
treasure, this war will mean the end of the United States as a
democratic Republic.

That's one way of putting it LOL

Those are the stakes that were made clear by George W. Bush in an
alarmist speech to an association of U.S. military officers on Sept.
5. He declared that the United States must battle not only likely or
even possible threats from terrorists, but the most fantastical
dreams of Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda about a mystical global
"caliphate."

Will there be white slavery in this calphate?

Adopting some of the most extreme rhetoric favored by his
neoconservative advisers, Bush also broadened the "war on terror"
beyond al-Qaeda-inspired terrorists and the Sunni-dominated Iraqi
insurgency to include the Shiite-run Hezbollah movement in Lebanon
and the Shiite government of Iran.

May as well George. An' throw in the Hindus and the Amish. There
aren't too many parts of the world left who aren't our enemies.

"As we continue to fight al-Qaeda and these Sunni extremists
inspired by their radical ideology, we also face the threat posed by
Shia extremists, who are learning from al-Qaeda, increasing their
assertiveness and stepping up their threats," Bush said.

It seems like both liberals an' conservatives use the word 'extreme'
for everything that they can't find legitimate fault with. Anyone who
won't compromise his belief to be part of the herd is extreme an'
that's bad. Oh well. It's not like there is a difference between a
liberal or a conservative.

"This Shia strain of Islamic radicalism is just as dangerous, and
just as hostile to America, and just as determined to establish its
brand of hegemony across the broader Middle East," Bush continued.
"And the Shia extremists have achieved something that al-Qaeda has so
far failed to do: In 1979, they took control of a major power, the
nation of Iran, subjugating its proud people to a regime of tyranny,
and using that nation's resources to fund the spread of terror and
pursue their radical agenda."

It's a good thing he said Shia an' Iran because for a second I thought
he was talking about USA an' Iraq..

Bush also cited his determination to defeat Hezbollah, a Shiite
movement in Lebanon that is now a prominent part of the elected
Lebanese government and broadly popular because its militia battled
the Israeli army when it invaded Lebanon in July.

Bush referred to Hezbollah's leader as "the terrorist Nasrallah,"
suggesting the United States has joined Israel in its determination
to kill Sheikh Sayyad Hassan Nasrallah who was rated the most
respected leader in the Middle East by an August 2006 poll in Egypt,
which is considered one of Washington's staunchest regional allies.

Ranked second in that Egyptian poll was Iran's president Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, another target of the Bush administration.

Admadinejad sure stands his ground.

By contrast,

Egypt's pro-American president Hosni Mubarak wasn't even in the top
10, coming in 11th. Polls across the Middle East also have shown
almost universal disapproval of the Bush administration and its policies.

So, Bush has set the United States on course to battle not only
the stateless terrorists of al-Qaeda and the stubborn insurgents in
Iraq but Islamic political leaders who have widespread support among
the Muslim masses. How the United States would win such a war or even
assemble the vast numbers of soldiers needed is hard to comprehend.

Nukes!

*"World War III"*

Bush's virtual declaration of war on the Islamic world ranks as
possibly the most ambitious military plan in American history - and
without doubt the most reckless. This so-called "long war," which
Bush's followers hail as "World War III," would mean fighting large
portions of a religious movement that has the allegiance of about
one-sixth of the planet's population.

Muslims are concentrated in nations from northern Africa to East
Asia, but also include large numbers in Europe and North America.

Nevertheless, in his address to the military officers, Bush
talked bravely about how confident he is that the United States will
win this war. "America will not bow down to tyrants," he declared to
applause.

As from one tyrant to another.

Bush's experience over the past five years, however, suggests
that his strategy would require a full-scale transformation of the
United States into a warrior nation, committed to a virtual endless
struggle against any and all Islamic extremists who harbor thoughts
of power, no matter how fanciful those imaginings might be.

LOLOL recruiters can't even make current quotas! They have to beg the
guys in their 40s to join.

A key point in Bush's argument is that al-Qaeda has expressed a
dream of creating a "caliphate" reaching from Spain to Indonesia.
Bush described the steps to this empire as starting with "numerous,
decentralized operating bases across the world, from which they can
plan new attacks, and advance their vision of a unified, totalitarian
Islamic state that can confront and eventually destroy the free world."

But the reality is that prior to Bush's presidency, al-Qaeda was
a marginal movement in the Islamic world, driven out of countries
across northern Africa, hounded by secular governments in the Middle
East, and expelled even from the Sudan.

Freedom fighters against the forces of evil! :)

In summer 2001, as Bush brushed aside CIA warnings about bin
Laden's plans to strike inside the United States, al-Qaeda leaders
were holed up in caves in Afghanistan, literally chased to the ends
of the earth.

Then, after the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington - and the
U.S. counterattack in Afghanistan - bin Laden fled to the mountains
of Tora Bora where he apologized to his followers for leading them to
what looked like defeat both militarily and politically, since the
vast majority of Muslims had joined the rest of the world in
condemning the 9/11 attacks.

Hmm I never heard about that

At that crucial moment, the Saudi terrorist leader set off on
horseback along with a small band of supporters and was surprised to
find that Bush hadn't ordered in U.S. troops to cut off al-Qaeda's
escape routes. Bush already was shifting his focus to Iraq, which was
governed by a secular dictator who had persecuted Islamic extremists
like bin Laden. [See, for instance, Ron Suskind's account in The One
Percent Doctrine.]

*Military Blunder*

The failure to trap or kill bin Laden at Tora Bora might rank as
one of modern history's worst military blunders. But in his Sept. 5
speech, Bush instead cited other historical failures - what he called
missed opportunities to eliminate Lenin and Hitler when they were
living in obscurity and writing about their improbable dreams of power.

Ha! Bush isn't worthy even to speak the name of Lenin. Bush was born
with a silver spoon in his mouth an' had to use family connections to
steal two elections. Lenin built a movement from the ground up out of
little more than books.

"In the early 1900s, an exiled lawyer in Europe published a
pamphlet called 'What Is To Be Done?' - in which he laid out his
plans to launch a communist revolution in Russia," Bush said. "The
world did not heed Lenin's words, and paid a terrible price. ...

"In the 1920s, a failed Austrian painter published a book in
which he explained his intention to build an Aryan super-state in
Germany and take revenge on Europe and eradicate the Jews. The world
ignored Hitler's words, and paid a terrible price."

But the problem with Bush's history lesson is that wiping out
some future Lenin or Hitler would require killing or imprisoning
anyone who wrote about political change in a way that rulers
considered objectionable or threatening at that time. While
"predictive assassination" might eliminate a Lenin or a Hitler, it
also might kill a Mandela or a Jefferson.

What Bush appears to be advocating is the end of free speech and
free thought, or at least the regulation and punishment of speech and
thought that he disdains. Bush is extending his concept of
"preemptive war" - launching attacks against countries that might
present a future threat to the United States - to "preemptive thought
control," eliminating political opponents who might pose some future
threat.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits the U.S.
government from criminalizing speech. But Bush is indicating that he
and his political followers believe that, amid the "war on terror,"
it is justifiable to do just that.

*Al-Qaeda Plot*

In another chilling passage in his speech, Bush laid out a
scenario for labeling criticism of him in the U.S. news media as part
of al-Qaeda's terrorist strategy. Bush claimed that bin Laden wrote
to Taliban leader Mullah Omar about launching "a media campaign ...
to create a wedge between the American people and their government."

Bush said this media campaign would send the American people
messages, including "that their government [will] bring them more
losses, in finances and casualties." Bush continued that bin Laden's
media plan "aims at creating pressure from the American people on the
American government to stop their campaign against Afghanistan."

Bush cited this supposed al-Qaeda manipulation of the U.S. media
as one of the reasons that "bin Laden and his allies are absolutely
convinced they can succeed in forcing America to retreat and causing
our economic collapse. They believe our nation is weak and decadent,
and lacking in patience and resolve. And they're wrong."

As Bush defines domestic criticism of his war's costs "in
finances and casualties" as part of a terrorist scheme, it's not hard
to imagine how Bush's devoted followers will react. Any expression of
concern that Bush is charting a course toward mad destruction will be
attacked as somehow acting in concert with terrorists.

Though Bush has said that his goal in waging his vague and
seemingly endless "war on terror" is to defend freedom, the reality
behind Bush's grim vision is the emergence of an American
totalitarianism where objectionable thought will be repressed and
dissent will be equated with treason.

Sounds like a reporter who's worried about his job LOL

Stormy

The President has now made clear that he wants the Nov. 7
congressional elections to be a referendum on whether Americans will
follow him into this dark future.

--------

/Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s
for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book,/ Secrecy &
Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, /can be
ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com <http://secrecyandprivilege.com>.
It's also available at Amazon.com <http://Amazon.com>, as is his 1999
book,/ Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.'

-------






- - -

This has been another "Down with rejects, Up with humanity" moment, with:

Turin


I have such sites to show you...
------------------------

http://members.fortunecity.com/turinturambar/
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First
http://mail2world.com/Blog/Turin@mail2zeus.com

------------------------

"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall burn in hell forever and ever...."

-----

--
- - -

This has been another enlightening moment, with:

Turin


I have such sites to show you...
------------------------

http://members.fortunecity.com/turinturambar/
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First
http://mail2world.com/Blog/Turin@mail2zeus.com

------------------------

"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall burn in hell forever and ever...."

-----