| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"DGVREIMAN" |
| Date: |
25 May 2005 12:44:39 PM |
| Object: |
NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED |
NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbrooks@msn.com>
Newsgroups: alt.war.vietnam,alt.news-media
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: SEVEN DIFFERENT LOCATIONS (WAS Re: THE LIBEL GANG
REVEALED
.... Nigel in part said: "You either were assigned to a specific
unit of the 25th Infantry (which you refuse to name) or your
were not...
(C) Copyright 2005 by Doug Grant (Tm) all rights reserved.
Doug Says: Nigel is lying again. How can the units I was assigned
to for rations and quarters reveal anything about what Nigel has
falsely claimed I have said? Nigel's US Army history is that of a
two-year draftee PX Commando. He does not have a clue how the US
Army works, and he clearly is not an expert on US Army, units,
their assignments, nor how they operated. Nigel said he wanted to
contact people that knew me, and no doubt he wants to ask them
leading and defamatory questions riddled with lies and
distortions, so as to solicit a negative response about me - much
the same as he did against the Silver Star winner Abrahams. That
is the reason Nigel always presents his FOIA request on me as a
threat - "Tick Tock" and all that. No thanks Nigel, we have all
seen your "investigative" tactics at work, and lies, distortions,
libel, defamation, fabrications, embellishment and false claims
to be a "federal agent" is not something I would wish on anyone I
ever knew in Vietnam.
The only way to prove or disprove everything I (or anyone else
involved in this issue) have ever said about our military service
is to exchange military records, verify those records with a
court order, in a legal arena. Nigel knows that entering a legal
arena and the resulting comprehensive release of all records will
prove him a liar, a defamer and a libeler. That is why each time
I offer a "comprehensive" release of military records coming
directly from the US Military in a legal arena, Nigel and his
gang runs, ducks, cowers, hides, whines, babbles excuses, lies,
snips out the offers, dodges, twists in the wind, pisses their
pants, and generally howl and bark insults and dodges form that
offer. Nigel and his gang et al are simply trying their desperate
best to hide the evidence that Nigel has been caught defaming and
lying about a real vet again just like he did in respect to the
Silver Star winner Abrahams. Yet what Nigel and his gang did to
that Silver Star winner is mild compared to what he is trying to
do to me.
(The court order will also require that Nigel and Gang members
reveal their true identities and aliases they are using on the
NG - and I believe Nigel absolutely wants to hide that
information as well).
Nigel in part said:
"The most telling thing about all of this is that rather than
immediately claim that your posts had been quips, forgeries,
the work product of others employed or associated with you -
you chose to go on the attack. It was not until some months
after the initial exchanges that you realized an FOIA request
was really in the works and you came up with the "quips,
forgeries, work of employess" story."
Doug Says: Nigel above has been caught, once again, in an
outright lie. I have already told Nigel that Google Archives
proves irrefutably there are not less than 75 previous archived
posts dating as far back as 1997 that state our group was using a
cooperative typist. I even searched and posted some of those
Google archived posts stating such facts for Nigel (see below for
some of them reposted here). I also proved that there were not
less than 59 Google archived posts that mention my posts were
being forged, also dating back to 1997. I also proved that there
are not less than 1700 Google archived posts mentioning aliases
both in respect to my accounts and others. Yet incredibly, and in
spite of all this evidence to the contrary, Nigel states above
that I never said anything about a cooperative typist or others
using my accounts until *after* he filed his FOIA request on me!
What absolute and outright, flagrant, and glaring lies this
"pretend Federal Agent" spews - and he claims he is searching for
the "truth?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
(I should also mention that other members of the Nigel gang such
as the hate America/Hate President Bush/Cyberstalker member
SteveL and aliases et al also is lying about this issue in his
posts as well - so as usual, Nigel lies, and his gang members
repeat it so as to help Nigel further his lies, distortions,
smears and libel).
Seven Different Places At the Same Time
Any investigation of the posts from the accounts Nigel has listed
as all coming from me clearly show posts on those accounts came
from not less than seven different geographical locations - some
which are thousands of miles apart. So along with Nigel's claim
of being a "mind reader" (which ability must have been achieved
from either seances or the wanton murder of chickens or other
small animals) now along with the rest of Nigel's bizarre claims
of mystic powers, Nigel is also claiming that I have the ability
to break the laws of physics, and post and exist in not less than
seven different locations simultaneously!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
So what did Nigel do when he was confronted with this irrefutable
and overwhelming evidence he lied when he said I wrote all those
quips he posted? He ducked, ran, hid, ignored, dodged, whined,
barked insults, and generally ran red-faced to his gang members
and told them to hide this evidence as much as they could. The
Cyberstakers, like SteveL, were also caught twisting in the wind
with their lies, and they are doing much the same as the rest of
the Nigel gang of smear merchants and fake Veterans. I must say
they are fun to watch scatter and bluster, and twist in the wind
red-faced when their lies were exposed. SteveL should be used to
it by now since he has been caught lying and distorting dozens of
times in the past, but I suspect getting caught in mid hype and
distortion is something new for the PFA Nigel Brooks.
(PFA="Pretend Federal Agent").
Investigator? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
So how can someone that claims he was once a "professional
investigator" for the US Custom Service lie, con, deceive,
distort, libel and try to ignore and hide as much evidence as he
can? Is Nigel a credit to the Custom Service or is he their
embarrassment? Based upon Nigel's obvious and glaring lies and
attempts to hide evidence in respect to his smear campaigns
against me and others, I would suspect the latter - Hell, I
believe also Nigel is an embarrassment to all Vietnam Vets, not
to mention any Government agency he ever worked for in the past.
(I would love to hear some names of perpetrators that Nigel
claimed he "investigated" - I wonder how much evidence Nigel hid,
lied about, distorted, and manipulated in those cases?)
I do not know Nigel Brooks personally. But I do know many other
GI's that opted to receive their ETS in Vietnam. ALL that I knew
were immoral village rats that loved to wallow in the filth and
whores of Vietnam. ALL I knew that stayed in that ***** hole after
ETS had a Vietnamese ***** in tow, or were running whores or
drugs, or was working the black market. These scum not only ran
civilian operations that dealt in the black market, but when they
got in trouble the first people they would call would be the US
Army to help them deliver their "goods." They thought nothing of
putting GI's in harm's way so they could deliver their goods,
grab that healthy paycheck, and get back to their hootch and
whores, and whatever else they were into in that filth hole known
as Vietnam. Many a good GI died keeping these scum in whores,
drugs, black market deals, and healthy paychecks. I thought them
scum and the lowlifes of the world then and I still do today- and
so did every other GI I ever knew. That might be what Nigel's
smear campaign against me and other real vets is all about -
considering his best chum Reese was over in Vietnam helping
Charlie celebrate his *victory* over all of our dead comrades,
and stuffing tourist money down the pockets of those VC that are
still holding our MIA's and POW's as slaves. Does Nigel and gang
members promote trips to Vietnam? Is that what they are into?
Helping our enemy keep our POW's as slaves and promoting trips to
Vietnamese brothels? (Any information in that regard will be
appreciated).
Nigel in part said: "Even more telling is the fact that you are
frantically doing
everything that you can to prevent the authorized disclosure
under FOIA procedures. Something that will not prevail Mr.
Reiman. You might wish to claim that the disclosure of your
military record would violate your right to privacy - but that
claim will not prevail. You have freely posted your Vietnam
experiences on the internet for years - you have no privacy in
respect to those things you have freely posted about.
tick tock tick tock
Nigel Brooks"
Tick Tock Threats Abounding
Doug Says: Nigel is caught lying again in the above paragraph.
Never have I posted any of my personal information on the
internet. Not once - ever. I have posted about Vietnam, but I
have not revealed any personal information unless the person
emailed me first and proved his identity and then I exchanged
detailed information only via email or personal correspondence.
(Note that Nigel also lied when he said that I never invited
email about Vietnam, and then when I posted a Google archive that
proved I did, Nigel also tried to hide that post along with his
gang members).
Considering all the threats, defamation, lies, distortions, and
libel I have received from Nigel and his gang, I would be an
absolute idiot to agree to release any personal information to
Nigel so he can post it all over the internet and thereby incite
identity theft and other attacks on me and my family. Nigel is
trying to cause me harm, cause me emotional distress, and attack
me anyway he can with whatever false information he can think of
or fabricate. He has made that fact clear, and one of his common
tactics is to *incite* defamation, attacks and any other distress
or threats he and his gang members can incite via lies,
distortions, defamation and outrageous libel and libel per se.
So of course I am not willing to allow Nigel to receive any
personal information on me from any source without an impartial
and legal control on that information. And I assure all the US
Army HRC nor the NARA will release any information to Nigel
unless he first goes to court. Then, we will be in a legal arena
and the court will be watching what Nigel does with his FOIA
information, and the court will also order my records, his
records, and all the gang's records as well.
I Am Willing to Back Up Everything
In that aforementioned legal arena, I am willing to state here
and now that I will back up every statement *I* have ever made
about my military service, under oath, with real documents. So if
anyone is really interested in the truth about this issue, they
should support and endorse such revelations in such a legal
arena. Ducking that comprehensive release of information on
*everyone* involved in this issue that the court will order,
including information on the cyberstalkers like SteveL and his
aliases, can only mean these people are lying and they really
wish to continue to suppress and hide the real truth and
evidence.
Below are samples of hundreds of Google Archived Posts on my old
accounts that prove Nigel and his gang are lying about when I
announced the cooperative Typist(s) and others that were using my
account. It is amazing that Nigel tried to use Google archives to
support his smear campaign against me, but then out of the other
side of his mouth he tries to hide and dismiss the same Google
archived posts that prove he is lying! Can't have one without the
other Nigel - and clearly you should have investigated these
accounts before you starting lying about who said what when.
This post is growing too long, and if anyone would like to see
even more proof Nigel and his gang are lying, email me.
Since I have proved irrefutably that Nigel Brooks and his gang
have been and are lying about the quips they have falsely
attributed to me, and their intrepreations of the quips I
actually did write, I do not intend to initiate any other posts
on the AWV newsgroup UNLESS I am defamed and libeled some more.
Then you can be sure I will reply to that libel and defend myself
thoroughly.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Below are some of the excerpts from posts that poor ol PFA Nigel
is trying to hide:
From: "DOUGLAS REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net> - Find messages
by
this author
Date: 1997/12/06
Subject: Re: More FRAUD! Grant confuses aliases again!!!
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
I notice that Solinas is cutting and posting again. He is real
good at
that. DeGennaro sent some email out with the same claims until
the ATT
manager checked it out.
Also, these posts were made in the East Coast, and I am located
on the
West
Coast, it is easy to determine which computer was used. Moreover,
Solinas
said before all of these individuals existed but will lie, and
now he is
back on the lie that they are all my aliases. But note he still
is
ignoring the offers of irrefutable proof. Moreover, if these
people are
using a typist then such errors could occur. I do not know the
facts, but
I do know that using a typist is not in violation with the CFV.
Nor has
it
anyhing to do with the fact the accounts in question used their
real
names
to vote, and voted from their own accounts/. That fact has been
proved,
and we are willing to provide any type of additional proof that
is
requested of us to verify that fact, including AOL bills and
other
documents.
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.blackjack, news.groups
From: "DOUGLAS REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net> - Find messages
by
this author
Date: 1997/12/27
Subject: Re: I Demand RGBJ Re-Vote
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
Please state where in the CFV it says a group of people cannot
use a
typist? Are you such an idiot that you do not realize that many
people find the collective use of a typist productive - or is
that
too much for you to comprehend? I know Solinas has lied about the
CFV, and they have posted the lie that a "typist" is a violation
of
the CFV. But if you want to lie and libel right along with him,
be
my guest. Just do not expect anyone to believe you no matter how
much you forge names and openly lie. One more idiot making an *****
out of himself with lies is fun, but still booring considering
your
alias fits right in with the rest.
Doug Grant (Tm)
DOUGLAS REIMAN <dggr...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Woops! I said that *I* have never used an alias. Many people use
aliases
on this newsgroup - most do in fact. I never have. I always
signed my
name with a version of Doug Grant. You and Abdul and friends
claimed that
Floyd Young (and about 50 or 60 other names) were MY aliases.
You were
trying to represent to the newbies that I was only one crazy
person that
was questioning all those fantastic system claims. You did not
want to
admit that dozens of former professional players were agreeing
with me.
So
now you have changed your story once again. I suggest you get
your
facts
straight before you post anymore self serving lies.
Doug Grant (Tm)
No Systems To Sell
Ah, but Doug did say that he and others "share the same typist."
What's the story there?
Who is the typist?
How do they share him or her?
Exactly what does that phrase mean?
John Chandler Sep 17 1997, 3:00 am show options
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.blackjack
From: (John Chandler) - Find messages by
this
author
Date: 1997/09/17
Subject: Yo, Abdul! (Was: Bye Bye Dougie Bye Bye Con)
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
In article <01bcc31a$b552cdc0$89ee93cf@dgÂ>,
DOUGLAS REIMAN <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
directed The Common Typist to write:
I have provided so much math to this group you should have it
coming out
of
your ears. But as long as you *ignore* it, I guess you can lie
and claim
you have never seen it.
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.blackjack
From: "DOUGLAS REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net> - Find messages
by
this author
Date: 1997/09/07
Subject: Re: Abdul, Moderated, Jimske, EC Davis, Pref Shuff
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
This question certainly is not tough or embarrasing. I have
already
answered it several times. A typist is someone who types. You
should
know
that - check your speller or call your mommy - she will explain
it to you.
I must say that I am getting tired of baby-sitting some on this
newsgroup.
If you do not know the meaning of a particiular word, then ask
someone
else
or look it up. Sheesh what wimps!
Doug Grant (Tm)
No Systems To Sell
.
|
|
| User: "Nigel Brooks" |
|
| Title: Re: NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED |
25 May 2005 03:16:24 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:gOidndQ3BuEeJAnfRVn-1A@comcast.com...
NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED
Copyright Nigel Brooks - All rights reserved 2005
Mr. Reiman
Your disparaging remarks concerning my service in Vietnam as both a member
of the United States Army and as a Civilian, along with your disparaging
remarks concerning my service as a criminal investigator with the United
States Government are noted. I would remind you that it is you who brought
up my service as a criminal investigator with the US Government - not I. In
doing so you have frantically tried to link my inquiries concerning your
Vietnam service to some imaginary association which you claim I have with my
former employer. Nothing could be further from the truth. My employment
with the US Government is of none of your business.
Concerning your veiled diatribes against those who worked in Vietnam in a
civilian capacity. In a past exchange, I politely provided you information
concerning my service in the US Military in Vietnam and my subsequent
service in Vietnam as a civilian working for Equipment Incorporated and as a
civilian investigator with the Army and Air Force Exchange Service. You
subsequently decided to take the information which I had provided you
regarding my time in Vietnam and characterize it as being that of a mere two
year draftee, px commando, etc etc.
My conclusion concerning your attacks is that it is obvious that you are
doing all you can to prevent the lawful release of your publicly available
military records under FOIA. The most logical reason for your frantic
attempts in that regard can only be because there is something in those
records which you do not wish revealed - there is something there that is
deeply troubling to you and you wish it to remain secret.
Your pathetic attempts to deny a member of the public access to records
which are considered publicly available under the Freedom of Information Act
is a violation of my right to know. Absolutely nothing shall deter me from
getting what is publicly available and any attempt by you to stop me from
that goal will be countered.
For at least the past 8 years, you have posted information concerning your
service in Vietnam and what you claim to have been your experiences in
Vietnam on the USENET. In doing so, you have forfeited any reasonable
expectation of privacy with regard to any records available under the
Freedom of Information Act.
This posting of yours containing the disparaging remarks concerning my over
30 years of combined military and civilian service with the United States
Government shall become part of the record in the event that I am forced to
take this matter into the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Missouri, St Louis Division.
Furthermore - your characterization of SteveL as being a "serial liar" is a
violation of my copyright of the term which I coined a number of months ago
about you. You are hereby requested to cease and desist in the use of the
term without approriate attribution
tick tock tick tock (copyright Nigel Brooks - All rights reserved - 2005)
--
Nigel Brooks
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cory Bhreckan " |
|
| Title: Re: NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED |
25 May 2005 03:41:11 PM |
|
|
Nigel Brooks wrote:
<snip>
Furthermore - your characterization of SteveL as being a "serial liar" is a
violation of my copyright of the term which I coined a number of months ago
about you.
Not to take sides in this or anything but the term "serial liar" has
been around alot longer than "a number of months". It used quite a bit
in the early '70s decribing Tricky *****. It has been used against every
US President since.
You are hereby requested to cease and desist in the use of the
term without approriate attribution
tick tock tick tock (copyright Nigel Brooks - All rights reserved - 2005)
Now back to your public and rather amusing squabble.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED |
25 May 2005 03:52:02 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:41:11 -0400, Cory Bhreckan <"
CBhreckan"@maelstrom.com> wrote:
Nigel Brooks wrote:
<snip>
Furthermore - your characterization of SteveL as being a "serial liar" is a
violation of my copyright of the term which I coined a number of months ago
about you.
Not to take sides in this or anything but the term "serial liar" has
been around alot longer than "a number of months". It used quite a bit
in the early '70s decribing Tricky *****. It has been used against every
US President since.
You are hereby requested to cease and desist in the use of the
term without approriate attribution
tick tock tick tock (copyright Nigel Brooks - All rights reserved - 2005)
Now back to your public and rather amusing squabble.
I have missed the amusing bits some how.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cory Bhreckan " |
|
| Title: Re: NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED |
25 May 2005 04:01:29 PM |
|
|
Eris wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:41:11 -0400, Cory Bhreckan <"
CBhreckan"@maelstrom.com> wrote:
Nigel Brooks wrote:
<snip>
Furthermore - your characterization of SteveL as being a "serial liar" is a
violation of my copyright of the term which I coined a number of months ago
about you.
Not to take sides in this or anything but the term "serial liar" has
been around alot longer than "a number of months". It used quite a bit
in the early '70s decribing Tricky *****. It has been used against every
US President since.
You are hereby requested to cease and desist in the use of the
term without approriate attribution
tick tock tick tock (copyright Nigel Brooks - All rights reserved - 2005)
Now back to your public and rather amusing squabble.
I have missed the amusing bits some how.
I'm easily amused. I am especialy amused by posters who slap copyright
notices all over their posts, as if anyone would want to steal it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rita Hansard" |
|
| Title: Re: NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED |
25 May 2005 04:47:49 PM |
|
|
"Cory Bhreckan" <" CBhreckan"@maelstrom.com> wrote in message
news:4294e92e@news101.his.com...
Eris wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:41:11 -0400, Cory Bhreckan <"
CBhreckan"@maelstrom.com> wrote:
Nigel Brooks wrote:
<snip>
Furthermore - your characterization of SteveL as being a "serial liar"
is a violation of my copyright of the term which I coined a number of
months ago about you.
Not to take sides in this or anything but the term "serial liar" has been
around alot longer than "a number of months". It used quite a bit in the
early '70s decribing Tricky *****. It has been used against every US
President since.
You are hereby requested to cease and desist in the use of the term
without approriate attribution
tick tock tick tock (copyright Nigel Brooks - All rights reserved -
2005)
Now back to your public and rather amusing squabble.
I have missed the amusing bits some how.
I'm easily amused. I am especialy amused by posters who slap copyright
notices all over their posts, as if anyone would want to steal it.
So glad to see that you understand intended sarcasm.
Rita (Not a lawyer)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Political Pagan" |
|
| Title: Re: NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED |
26 May 2005 12:08:01 AM |
|
|
Cory Bhreckan <" CBhreckan"@maelstrom.com> wrote in
news:4294e92e@news101.his.com:
I'm easily amused. I am especialy amused by posters who slap copyright
notices all over their posts, as if anyone would want to steal it.
It's called sarcastic mocking of Doogie.
--
"It's interesting. I see all these political ads and all these
commentators say it's our job as Americans to vote. Let me tell
you something, with Bush in charge of the economy, this might
be the only job you have all year." -Jay Leno
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nigel Brooks" |
|
| Title: Re: NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED |
25 May 2005 05:08:32 PM |
|
|
Spoilsport
--
Nigel Brooks
"Cory Bhreckan" <" CBhreckan"@maelstrom.com> wrote in message
news:4294e46c$1@news101.his.com...
Nigel Brooks wrote:
<snip>
Furthermore - your characterization of SteveL as being a "serial liar"
is a violation of my copyright of the term which I coined a number of
months ago about you.
Not to take sides in this or anything but the term "serial liar" has been
around alot longer than "a number of months". It used quite a bit in the
early '70s decribing Tricky *****. It has been used against every US
President since.
You are hereby requested to cease and desist in the use of the term
without approriate attribution
tick tock tick tock (copyright Nigel Brooks - All rights reserved - 2005)
Now back to your public and rather amusing squabble.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: NIGEL BROOK'S LIES EXPOSED |
25 May 2005 03:45:00 PM |
|
|
only DOUGIE tells the truth,,,EVERYONE else is a liar
or look it up. Sheesh what wimps!
Doug Grant (Tm)
No Systems To Sell
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
