| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Spaulding Greystoke" |
| Date: |
03 Dec 2005 09:42:05 AM |
| Object: |
NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
Damn, their own graphics conflict with each other.
--
http://www.bedoper.com
You have been banned for the following reason:
You broke about every forum rule possible.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.bautforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19
.
|
|
| User: "Harvey" |
|
| Title: Re: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
03 Dec 2005 04:34:46 PM |
|
|
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97216296775DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the
planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
Damn, their own graphics conflict with each other.
Actually there was no fire in WTC1 core because there was no fire
anywhere. WTC was never hit. By anything. It's still there, just hidden,
and is now a secret training base for invisible spies of a rogue branch
of the CIA. It's a hideous plot.
--
http://www.bedoper.com
You have been banned for the following reason:
You broke about every forum rule possible.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.bautforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spaulding Greystoke" |
|
| Title: Re: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
03 Dec 2005 04:53:49 PM |
|
|
"Harvey" <researchermd@netscape.net> wrote in news:7budnTOBvqnggA_eRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97216296775DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the
planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
Damn, their own graphics conflict with each other.
Actually there was no fire in WTC1 core because there was no fire
anywhere. WTC was never hit. By anything. It's still there, just
hidden,
and is now a secret training base for invisible spies of a rogue branch
of the CIA. It's a hideous plot.
How wonderfully retarded of you.
--
http://www.bedoper.com
You have been banned for the following reason:
You broke about every forum rule possible.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.bautforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harvey" |
|
| Title: Re: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
03 Dec 2005 05:06:53 PM |
|
|
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9721ABC8FB6DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
"Harvey" <researchermd@netscape.net> wrote in
news:7budnTOBvqnggA_eRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97216296775DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the
planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
Damn, their own graphics conflict with each other.
Actually there was no fire in WTC1 core because there was no fire
anywhere. WTC was never hit. By anything. It's still there, just
hidden,
and is now a secret training base for invisible spies of a rogue
branch
of the CIA. It's a hideous plot.
How wonderfully retarded of you.
I got proof, Jason. Check any recent picture, even the ones on your
microcephalic site, of downtown NY. You can't see the WTC buildings.
Proof right there before your eyes. They're hidden. It's a huge
conspiracy.
--
http://www.bedoper.com
You have been banned for the following reason:
You broke about every forum rule possible.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.bautforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spaulding Greystoke" |
|
| Title: NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
03 Dec 2005 06:27:23 PM |
|
|
"Harvey" <researchermd@netscape.net> wrote in news:sbadnRvQx9aZuA_eRVn-
hg@comcast.com:
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9721ABC8FB6DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
"Harvey" <researchermd@netscape.net> wrote in
news:7budnTOBvqnggA_eRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97216296775DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the
planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
NIST: NO FIRE IN WTC 1 CORE
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
Damn, their own graphics conflict with each other.
Actually there was no fire in WTC1 core because there was no fire
anywhere. WTC was never hit. By anything. It's still there, just
hidden,
and is now a secret training base for invisible spies of a rogue
branch
of the CIA. It's a hideous plot.
How wonderfully retarded of you.
I got proof, Jason. Check any recent picture, even the ones on your
microcephalic site, of downtown NY. You can't see the WTC buildings.
Proof right there before your eyes. They're hidden. It's a huge
conspiracy.
Yes. As I said, you're a drooling moron.
--
http://www.bedoper.com
You have been banned for the following reason:
You broke about every forum rule possible.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.bautforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harvey" |
|
| Title: Re: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
03 Dec 2005 09:25:06 PM |
|
|
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9721BBA606E3112345666@207.14.113.17...
"Harvey" <researchermd@netscape.net> wrote in
news:sbadnRvQx9aZuA_eRVn-
hg@comcast.com:
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9721ABC8FB6DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
"Harvey" <researchermd@netscape.net> wrote in
news:7budnTOBvqnggA_eRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97216296775DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the
planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself
to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
NIST: NO FIRE IN WTC 1 CORE
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
Damn, their own graphics conflict with each other.
Actually there was no fire in WTC1 core because there was no fire
anywhere. WTC was never hit. By anything. It's still there, just
hidden,
and is now a secret training base for invisible spies of a rogue
branch
of the CIA. It's a hideous plot.
How wonderfully retarded of you.
I got proof, Jason. Check any recent picture, even the ones on your
microcephalic site, of downtown NY. You can't see the WTC buildings.
Proof right there before your eyes. They're hidden. It's a huge
conspiracy.
Yes. As I said, you're a drooling moron.
Cite? For the "as I said"? Can you PROVE you said I was a drooling moron
before just now?
--
http://www.bedoper.com
You have been banned for the following reason:
You broke about every forum rule possible.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.bautforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
04 Dec 2005 08:03:55 AM |
|
|
Spaulding Greystoke wrote:
"Harvey" <researchermd@netscape.net> wrote in news:sbadnRvQx9aZuA_eRVn-
hg@comcast.com:
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9721ABC8FB6DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
"Harvey" <researchermd@netscape.net> wrote in
news:7budnTOBvqnggA_eRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
"Spaulding Greystoke" <KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97216296775DE12345666@207.14.113.17...
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the
planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
NIST: NO FIRE IN WTC 1 CORE
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
LMFAO! According to our resident retard, Jason, 600 degrees is normal
core temperature.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
03 Dec 2005 10:28:30 AM |
|
|
Spaulding Greystoke wrote:
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
Damn, their own graphics conflict with each other.
Wow... get this... Jason claims there was no fire in the core, and then
tries to prove it by linking to the above graphic.
Tell us, Jason, was it always 600 degrees in the elevators?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Happy Hippy" |
|
| Title: Re: NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
03 Dec 2005 11:01:27 AM |
|
|
Spaulding Greystoke wrote:
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
Damn, their own graphics conflict with each other.
You guys better watch out.
They already got the Terrorist Act passed, and
you could get thrown in jail with no trial
indefinitely for questioning Bush et al.
It looks to me like the good ol' USA has been
hijacked.
John
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sky King" |
|
| Title: Re: NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
03 Dec 2005 11:38:20 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:01:27 -0600, Happy Hippy <J0HN@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
Spaulding Greystoke wrote:
Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote in
news:mlg2p1dkss0o28bdj0nnm81fj53hea1vfd@4ax.com:
On 2 Dec 2005 15:58:23 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1133512559.483079.209270@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
"Since the temperatures created by the burning fuels from the planes,
were not high enough to deform the steel supports, some other
explaination must be explored to find out the true cause of the
towers
collapse. "
It is unfortunate that you could not have been there yourself to
experience this cool burning fire that you imagine.
NIST says there basically WAS NO FIRE in the WTC 1 core.
Cite?
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/floortemps_f6_36.jpg
Damn, their own graphics conflict with each other.
You guys better watch out.
They already got the Terrorist Act passed, and
you could get thrown in jail with no trial
indefinitely for questioning Bush et al.
It looks to me like the good ol' USA has been
hijacked.
John
Nothing to worry about. The 9/11 Denial Movement is so stupid that it makes
Bush look like a genius. No reason to throw your best assets into jail.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cleopatra" |
|
| Title: Re: NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core |
03 Dec 2005 11:07:47 AM |
|
|
X-No-archive: yes
Happy Hippy wrote:
(snip)
It looks to me like the good ol' USA has been
hijacked.
Translation: Us liberals can't win elections anymore. Woe is us!
Cleopatra
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
