| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"grinder" |
| Date: |
11 May 2007 01:56:00 PM |
| Object: |
No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of wrongdoing has
not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents. Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was convicted of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was destroyed.
.
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
11 May 2007 08:46:52 PM |
|
|
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was convicted of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges all the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "WF Peifer" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
13 May 2007 12:13:59 PM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges all the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any wrongdoing on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader and broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something absurdly minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
13 May 2007 04:44:52 PM |
|
|
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges all the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any wrongdoing on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "Titix" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
17 May 2007 01:34:09 AM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any wrongdoing
on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
For having sex. Starr was not appointed to find what kind sex Clinton was
having.
He was to investigate the White Water and found NOTHING on Clinton.
Gosh, you right wingers have one track mind! Now here we have an
administration
with all kinds of scandals, a war in false pretence with thousands killed
and many
more thousands crippled for life, tramping on our Constitution, and you
folkies *****
don't demand an impeachment. Do you morons see the difference?
But I think you neocons are finished. Just wait for the elections in 08.
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some
people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "WF Peifer" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
13 May 2007 07:18:48 PM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any wrongdoing
on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
*****. Starr didn't find any smoking guns to tie to Clinton regarding
Whitewater, and had to go back to the GOP-controlled Congress to get them to
allow him to expand the scope of his witch hunt. And all the while he was
acting as a pro bono legal advisor to the GOP-paid lawyers who were helping
Paula Jones with her "without merit" civil case, a clear conflict of
interest.
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "Titix" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
17 May 2007 02:12:28 AM |
|
|
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:A4ednYHyobwtAdrbnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse
to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was
convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore
it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any wrongdoing
on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
*****. Starr didn't find any smoking guns to tie to Clinton regarding
Whitewater, and had to go back to the GOP-controlled Congress to get them
to
allow him to expand the scope of his witch hunt. And all the while he was
acting as a pro bono legal advisor to the GOP-paid lawyers who were
helping
Paula Jones with her "without merit" civil case, a clear conflict of
interest.
--
Everybody knows that repubs (neocons) are law breakers, you can see it
every day on the news. And they still continuo to break the law and lie
about it.
That's why Gonzo can't remember a thing. These people are not fit to hold
any
public office.
They witch hunted Clinton for 8 years, and I wonder if they were jealous of
him
because even now that he's been out of office for 6 yrs. they still bring
him out on
every discussion where the corruption of this administration is mentioned.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
17 May 2007 08:21:41 AM |
|
|
"Titix" <nospam@spamfree.com> wrote in message
news:DfT2i.591$C96.461@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:A4ednYHyobwtAdrbnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse
to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was
convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges
all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore
it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any
wrongdoing
on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
*****. Starr didn't find any smoking guns to tie to Clinton regarding
Whitewater, and had to go back to the GOP-controlled Congress to get them
to
allow him to expand the scope of his witch hunt. And all the while he
was
acting as a pro bono legal advisor to the GOP-paid lawyers who were
helping
Paula Jones with her "without merit" civil case, a clear conflict of
interest.
--
Everybody knows that repubs (neocons) are law breakers, you can see it
every day on the news. And they still continuo to break the law and lie
about it.
People like William Jefferson (who was laundering money and used military
assessts during Katrina to retrive that money), Harry Reid (who forgot about
a land deal witch was improper), John Murtha (abscam), Ms. America Pelosi
(who exempt american samoa from the minimum wage law because a plant there
had it's corprate headquarters in Nancy's district), and GARY STUDDS (who
raped kids and not only got a standing ovation, but a committee chairmanship
out of it).
That's why Gonzo can't remember a thing. These people are not fit to hold
any
public office.
Not all of our guys are saints, don't go thinking all of you guys are pure
and holy.
They witch hunted Clinton for 8 years, and I wonder if they were jealous
of
him
because even now that he's been out of office for 6 yrs. they still bring
him out on
every discussion where the corruption of this administration is mentioned.
Because his equally dishonest and immoral wife is running for president.
If she gets the job, it would reason what he would do in the white house.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "WF Peifer" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
17 May 2007 07:23:51 PM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f2hhdl$7o0$1@news.albasani.net...
"Titix" <nospam@spamfree.com> wrote in message
news:DfT2i.591$C96.461@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:A4ednYHyobwtAdrbnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent.
Refuse
to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was
convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges
all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just
ignore
it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any
wrongdoing
on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader
and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something
absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
*****. Starr didn't find any smoking guns to tie to Clinton
regarding
Whitewater, and had to go back to the GOP-controlled Congress to get
them
to
allow him to expand the scope of his witch hunt. And all the while he
was
acting as a pro bono legal advisor to the GOP-paid lawyers who were
helping
Paula Jones with her "without merit" civil case, a clear conflict of
interest.
--
Everybody knows that repubs (neocons) are law breakers, you can see it
every day on the news. And they still continuo to break the law and lie
about it.
People like William Jefferson (who was laundering money and used military
assessts during Katrina to retrive that money),
A dirtbag, and a disgrace. We'll give you one there. That would make the
score about 350-1.
Harry Reid (who forgot about
a land deal witch was improper),
The deal wasn't improper. It was totally legal, and didn't even violate any
Senate ethics rules. The only thing that was "improper" was the way he
reported it on his ethics reporting paperwork, which he corrected as soon as
the error was brought to his attention.
John Murtha (abscam),
Yeah, the one guy targeted by the (later judged to be "entrapment") sting
operation to be caught on tape saying "Not interested", and subsequently
cleared of all wrongdoing.
Ms. America Pelosi
(who exempt american samoa from the minimum wage law because a plant there
had it's corprate headquarters in Nancy's district),
Like American Saipan, Tom DeLay's favorite collection of sweatshops and
brothels, which he refered to as his "petri dish of capitalism", American
Samoa has ALWAYS been exempt from the minimum wage law. It was Pelosi and
the Democrats that were trying to get that changed, while DeLay and the
Republicans were fighting to keep it the same.
and GARY STUDDS (who
raped kids and not only got a standing ovation, but a committee
chairmanship
out of it).
Try to keep the facts straight.
1. A long-term consentual affair is not "rape".
2. He was censured by the Democratic House.
3. He LOST his ranking in the House because of the censure.
4. The standing ovation he got was from his constituents, because he had
done a GREAT job of representing them.
5. He was reelected, and finally got back into a chairmanship committee 10
years after the censure.
That's why Gonzo can't remember a thing. These people are not fit to
hold
any
public office.
Not all of our guys are saints, don't go thinking all of you guys are pure
and holy.
They witch hunted Clinton for 8 years, and I wonder if they were jealous
of
him
because even now that he's been out of office for 6 yrs. they still
bring
him out on
every discussion where the corruption of this administration is
mentioned.
Because his equally dishonest and immoral wife is running for president.
If she gets the job, it would reason what he would do in the white house.
Please cite what Hillary has done that would characterize her as either
"dishonest" or "immoral". Personally, I don't like her or support her, but
if you're going to slander someone, at least have some good rumors to back
it up. Don't just make up ***** as you go along.
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
17 May 2007 12:08:10 PM |
|
|
On May 17, 6:21 am, "SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
"Titix" <nos...@spamfree.com> wrote in message
news:DfT2i.591$C96.461@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPei...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:A4ednYHyobwtAdrbnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPei...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <sea...@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse
to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was
convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges
all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore
it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any
wrongdoing
on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
*****. Starr didn't find any smoking guns to tie to Clinton regarding
Whitewater, and had to go back to the GOP-controlled Congress to get them
to
allow him to expand the scope of his witch hunt. And all the while he
was
acting as a pro bono legal advisor to the GOP-paid lawyers who were
helping
Paula Jones with her "without merit" civil case, a clear conflict of
interest.
--
Everybody knows that repubs (neocons) are law breakers, you can see it
every day on the news. And they still continuo to break the law and lie
about it.
People like William Jefferson (who was laundering money and used military
assessts during Katrina to retrive that money), Harry Reid (who forgot about
a land deal witch was improper), John Murtha (abscam), Ms. America Pelosi
(who exempt american samoa from the minimum wage law because a plant there
had it's corprate headquarters in Nancy's district), and GARY STUDDS (who
raped kids and not only got a standing ovation, but a committee chairmanship
out of it).> That's why Gonzo can't remember a thing. These people are not fit to hold
any
public office.
Not all of our guys are saints, don't go thinking all of you guys are pure
and holy.
They witch hunted Clinton for 8 years, and I wonder if they were jealous
of
him
because even now that he's been out of office for 6 yrs. they still bring
him out on
every discussion where the corruption of this administration is mentioned.
Because his equally dishonest and immoral wife is running for president.
If she gets the job, it would reason what he would do in the white house.
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Good God, no. We can't allow that adulterer and seducer of young girls
placed in his care as interns ever to enter the White House again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SyVyN11" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
17 May 2007 05:29:57 PM |
|
|
<wrabenator@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179421690.018041.20350@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 17, 6:21 am, "SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
"Titix" <nos...@spamfree.com> wrote in message
news:DfT2i.591$C96.461@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPei...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:A4ednYHyobwtAdrbnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPei...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <sea...@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent.
Refuse
to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find
documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was
convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges
all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just
ignore
it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any
wrongdoing
on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and
Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader
and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't
had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something
absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
*****. Starr didn't find any smoking guns to tie to Clinton
regarding
Whitewater, and had to go back to the GOP-controlled Congress to get
them
to
allow him to expand the scope of his witch hunt. And all the while he
was
acting as a pro bono legal advisor to the GOP-paid lawyers who were
helping
Paula Jones with her "without merit" civil case, a clear conflict of
interest.
--
Everybody knows that repubs (neocons) are law breakers, you can see it
every day on the news. And they still continuo to break the law and lie
about it.
People like William Jefferson (who was laundering money and used military
assessts during Katrina to retrive that money), Harry Reid (who forgot
about
a land deal witch was improper), John Murtha (abscam), Ms. America Pelosi
(who exempt american samoa from the minimum wage law because a plant
there
had it's corprate headquarters in Nancy's district), and GARY STUDDS (who
raped kids and not only got a standing ovation, but a committee
chairmanship
out of it).> That's why Gonzo can't remember a thing. These people are
not fit to hold
any
public office.
Not all of our guys are saints, don't go thinking all of you guys are
pure
and holy.
They witch hunted Clinton for 8 years, and I wonder if they were
jealous
of
him
because even now that he's been out of office for 6 yrs. they still
bring
him out on
every discussion where the corruption of this administration is
mentioned.
Because his equally dishonest and immoral wife is running for president.
If she gets the job, it would reason what he would do in the white house.
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Good God, no. We can't allow that adulterer and seducer of young girls
placed in his care as interns ever to enter the White House again.
If that's your bag, fine. I was talking about ***** like giving the
chinesse missle tech or trusting North Korea and then having NK reneg on
their deal weeks after signing it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "fargo116" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
17 May 2007 05:34:11 PM |
|
|
On May 17, 4:29 pm, "SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
<wrabena...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179421690.018041.20350@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 17, 6:21 am, "SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
"Titix" <nos...@spamfree.com> wrote in message
news:DfT2i.591$C96.461@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPei...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:A4ednYHyobwtAdrbnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPei...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <sea...@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent.
Refuse
to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find
documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was
convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges
all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just
ignore
it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any
wrongdoing
on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and
Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader
and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't
had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something
absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
*****. Starr didn't find any smoking guns to tie to Clinton
regarding
Whitewater, and had to go back to the GOP-controlled Congress to get
them
to
allow him to expand the scope of his witch hunt. And all the while he
was
acting as a pro bono legal advisor to the GOP-paid lawyers who were
helping
Paula Jones with her "without merit" civil case, a clear conflict of
interest.
--
Everybody knows that repubs (neocons) are law breakers, you can see it
every day on the news. And they still continuo to break the law and lie
about it.
People like William Jefferson (who was laundering money and used military
assessts during Katrina to retrive that money), Harry Reid (who forgot
about
a land deal witch was improper), John Murtha (abscam), Ms. America Pelosi
(who exempt american samoa from the minimum wage law because a plant
there
had it's corprate headquarters in Nancy's district), and GARY STUDDS (who
raped kids and not only got a standing ovation, but a committee
chairmanship
out of it).> That's why Gonzo can't remember a thing. These people are
not fit to hold
any
public office.
Not all of our guys are saints, don't go thinking all of you guys are
pure
and holy.
They witch hunted Clinton for 8 years, and I wonder if they were
jealous
of
him
because even now that he's been out of office for 6 yrs. they still
bring
him out on
every discussion where the corruption of this administration is
mentioned.
Because his equally dishonest and immoral wife is running for president.
If she gets the job, it would reason what he would do in the white house.
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Good God, no. We can't allow that adulterer and seducer of young girls
placed in his care as interns ever to enter the White House again.
If that's your bag, fine. I was talking about ***** like giving the
chinesse missle tech or trusting North Korea and then having NK reneg on
their deal weeks after signing it.
Wrab, if the coward hasn't put you in his killfile already, point out
to him that Big Bill never gave the Chinese any missile tech and ask
him what deal involving the NK he's talking about. Is he talking about
one we were watching to see if they'd renege on it or is he talking
about the one where the Drunken Frat Boy reneged on one of Big Bill's
promises so the NKs said "Well ***** it then," and reneged on theirs?
Better hurry before he puts his awesome killfilter on you. He does
that when he gets backed into a corner.
S. Olson
S. Olson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "fargo116" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
17 May 2007 05:45:34 PM |
|
|
On May 17, 4:29 pm, "SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
<wrabena...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179421690.018041.20350@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 17, 6:21 am, "SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
"Titix" <nos...@spamfree.com> wrote in message
news:DfT2i.591$C96.461@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPei...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:A4ednYHyobwtAdrbnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPei...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <sea...@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent.
Refuse
to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find
documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was
convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges
all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just
ignore
it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any
wrongdoing
on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and
Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader
and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't
had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something
absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
*****. Starr didn't find any smoking guns to tie to Clinton
regarding
Whitewater, and had to go back to the GOP-controlled Congress to get
them
to
allow him to expand the scope of his witch hunt. And all the while he
was
acting as a pro bono legal advisor to the GOP-paid lawyers who were
helping
Paula Jones with her "without merit" civil case, a clear conflict of
interest.
--
Everybody knows that repubs (neocons) are law breakers, you can see it
every day on the news. And they still continuo to break the law and lie
about it.
People like William Jefferson (who was laundering money and used military
assessts during Katrina to retrive that money), Harry Reid (who forgot
about
a land deal witch was improper), John Murtha (abscam), Ms. America Pelosi
(who exempt american samoa from the minimum wage law because a plant
there
had it's corprate headquarters in Nancy's district), and GARY STUDDS (who
raped kids and not only got a standing ovation, but a committee
chairmanship
out of it).> That's why Gonzo can't remember a thing. These people are
not fit to hold
any
public office.
Not all of our guys are saints, don't go thinking all of you guys are
pure
and holy.
They witch hunted Clinton for 8 years, and I wonder if they were
jealous
of
him
because even now that he's been out of office for 6 yrs. they still
bring
him out on
every discussion where the corruption of this administration is
mentioned.
Because his equally dishonest and immoral wife is running for president.
If she gets the job, it would reason what he would do in the white house.
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Good God, no. We can't allow that adulterer and seducer of young girls
placed in his care as interns ever to enter the White House again.
If that's your bag, fine. I was talking about ***** like giving the
chinesse missle tech or trusting North Korea and then having NK reneg on
their deal weeks after signing it.
Wrabe, make sure that Sylvia the ***** Burner has not put you into his
killfile before telling him that Big Bill never gave and missile
technology to the Chinese. He does that with things he doesn't like.
If Sylvia holds his breath, stomps his feet and turns blue, ask him
why such a serious charge was never ever included in the Articles of
Impeachment.
S. Olson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lamont Cranston" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
14 May 2007 10:05:48 AM |
|
|
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f27td4$34e$1@news.albasani.net...
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of
wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was
destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges all
the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any wrongdoing on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was
obliged to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
Starr was not involved in the impeachment.
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: No evidence of Gonzales wrong doing. |
13 May 2007 03:47:31 PM |
|
|
On May 13, 2:44 pm, "SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
"WF Peifer" <WFPei...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:AfWdnVIAWuBmpdrbnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com...
"SyVyN11" <syvy...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:f232qr$7qd$1@news.albasani.net...
"grinder" <sea...@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:4%21i.8980$Ut6.5245@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"The list of accusations has mushroomed, but the evidence of wrongdoing
has not," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the
committee.
This has the same scent as the outing of the C.I.A. agent. Refuse to
testify. Provide misleading information. Can't find documents.
Stonewall.
Someone should ask Mr. Smith how many murders Al Capone was convicted
of.
Answer: ZERO. Because nobody would testify and evidence was destroyed.
Silly, liberals don't need proof! Either they make the charges all the
proof they need, or if proof goes against them, they'll just ignore it.
This sounds like an amazingly accurate description of Ken Starr's
"Whitewater Investigation". Starr found no evidence of any wrongdoing on
the part of those he was chartered to investigate (Bill and Hillary
Clinton), so he just made the scope of his investigation broader and
broader
until he found relatively minor wrongdoing by others who hadn't had
contact
with the Clintons in years, and then finally found something absurdly
minor
in a completely unrelated matter to go after Bill with.
Wrong-o, as a investigation found out evidence of a crime, Starr was obliged
to take it to trial.
In this case impeachment.
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
