| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Paul J. Berg" |
| Date: |
20 Jan 2007 12:21:22 PM |
| Object: |
NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
~
With Hillary Clinton's announcement that she in the 2008 presidential
race, we should ask ourselves ~ "Do we really want another former high
school cheerleader, who worked on Barry Goldwater's 1964 presidential
campaign, in The White House?" Has not six years of George W. Bush
shown us that this type of individual is not what we need running the
country.
~
.
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
23 Jan 2007 02:23:14 PM |
|
|
"Baxter" <lbax02.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:12rar9noirnml12@corp.supernews.com...
Nothing says "Y'all come back now" like taking the word of an illegal
alien/drug lord in the criminal trial against two border agents who are
imprisoned for trying to stop him except ignoring the pleas of the public
and Congress to pardon the agents for doing their job.
Shove it in your ear gatt
For what purpose? *removes gloves*
it was every day people not much different from you that sat on that jury
and convicted those agents when they heard the
actual -facts- of the story instead of the propaganda you're purveying.
OJ didn't commit murder, did he? Because he was found not guilty, right?
Do you know that they heard the actual facts? Were you there? What about
the three jurors who claim they were coerced into a guilty verdict?
Do you think these folks would have gotten that long of a sentence if they
were white?
"Ramos also said that both supervisors who were at the scene knew shots had
been fired but did not file reports.
Mary Stillinger, Ramos' attorney, and Maria Ramirez, Compean's attorney,
said during the trial that every other Border Patrol agent at the scene also
failed to report shots had been fired."
http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_4141562
Good job, Baxter. You, Bush and Alberto Gonzalez finally agree on
something.
-c
"How are we supposed to follow the Border Patrol strategy of apprehending
terrorists or drug smugglers if we are not supposed to pursue fleeing
people?" he continued. "Everybody who's breaking the law flees from us. What
are we supposed to do? Do they want us to catch them or not?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Baxter" |
|
| Title: Re: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
23 Jan 2007 08:57:32 PM |
|
|
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12rcrlniss8mu85@corp.supernews.com...
"Baxter" <lbax02.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:12rar9noirnml12@corp.supernews.com...
Nothing says "Y'all come back now" like taking the word of an illegal
alien/drug lord in the criminal trial against two border agents who are
imprisoned for trying to stop him except ignoring the pleas of the
public
and Congress to pardon the agents for doing their job.
Shove it in your ear gatt
For what purpose? *removes gloves*
Whaddya gonna do? Gum me to death?
it was every day people not much different from you that sat on that
jury
and convicted those agents when they heard the
actual -facts- of the story instead of the propaganda you're purveying.
OJ didn't commit murder, did he? Because he was found not guilty, right?
Whether OJ committed murder or not, is not relevant. OJ got off because the
procecution didn't prove he did it. The facts the procecution presented
weren't sufficient.
Do you know that they heard the actual facts? Were you there?
Certainly YOU weren't there - yet you somehow know more than those who were
there and did hear the facts of the case. In that you're just like BT.
What about
the three jurors who claim they were coerced into a guilty verdict?
Oh, that's a new twist - wasn't in any of the original versions of the
story. Keep embellishing - perhaps you can write your best seller based on
this. Perhaps if you added a dragon or some elves in there.
Feh!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "lein" |
|
| Title: Re: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
22 Jan 2007 05:21:44 PM |
|
|
Paul J. Berg wrote:
~
With Hillary Clinton's announcement that she in the 2008 presidential
race, we should ask ourselves ~ "Do we really want another former high
school cheerleader, who worked on Barry Goldwater's 1964 presidential
campaign, in The White House?" Has not six years of George W. Bush
shown us that this type of individual is not what we need running the
country.
How can someone who couldn't stand up to her cheatin husband, stand up
to the Chicoms?
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
22 Jan 2007 06:48:58 PM |
|
|
"lein" <boomer_the_cat@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1169508104.577383.67350@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
How can someone who couldn't stand up to her cheatin husband, stand up
to the Chicoms?
What should she have done? Divorce him? That's right wing religion at its
finest: "'Til death do us part (yeah, my *****)"
She championed---get this, yer gonna hate it--family values by NOT DIVORCING
and, instead, by working through their marital issues. Remember what a
wedding VOW is, Lein?
Apparently, she's damned for that, too, huh? Now, if she'd have been a good
conservative like Gingrich, she'd be a good candidate, huh?
"Gingrich has been married three times. In 1962, Gingrich married his first
wife, Jackie Battley, resulting in the birth of two daughters. He began to
discuss divorce with Jackie in 1981, while she was in the hospital
recovering from cancer surgery. Gingrich married his second wife, Marianne
Ginther, in the fall of 1981. [4] They divorced in 1999 because of her
dislike for Washington D.C. and other difficuties. A year later, he married
a House aide, Callista Bisek [5] amid rumors the two had an affair during
his previous marriage."
Lein, hypocrisy like yours is why I can no longer support the so-called
"right" so-called "conservative" wing. As long as -they're- the ones
doing it, it's cool. But regardless of what the opponent does, they're
considered morally inferior.
Jesus would disagree.
-c
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Cipale" |
|
| Title: Re: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
22 Jan 2007 11:38:24 AM |
|
|
gatt wrote:
"lein" <boomer_the_cat@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1169508104.577383.67350@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
How can someone who couldn't stand up to her cheatin husband, stand up
to the Chicoms?
What should she have done? Divorce him? That's right wing religion at its
finest: "'Til death do us part (yeah, my *****)"
She championed---get this, yer gonna hate it--family values by NOT DIVORCING
and, instead, by working through their marital issues. Remember what a
wedding VOW is, Lein?
Apparently, she's damned for that, too, huh? Now, if she'd have been a good
conservative like Gingrich, she'd be a good candidate, huh?
"Gingrich has been married three times. In 1962, Gingrich married his first
wife, Jackie Battley, resulting in the birth of two daughters. He began to
discuss divorce with Jackie in 1981, while she was in the hospital
recovering from cancer surgery. Gingrich married his second wife, Marianne
Ginther, in the fall of 1981. [4] They divorced in 1999 because of her
dislike for Washington D.C. and other difficuties. A year later, he married
a House aide, Callista Bisek [5] amid rumors the two had an affair during
his previous marriage."
Lein, hypocrisy like yours is why I can no longer support the so-called
"right" so-called "conservative" wing. As long as -they're- the ones
doing it, it's cool. But regardless of what the opponent does, they're
considered morally inferior.
Jesus would disagree.
-c
The piety of the right is only exceeded by their hypocrisy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "lein" |
|
| Title: Re: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
23 Jan 2007 10:04:59 AM |
|
|
Joe Cipale wrote:
gatt wrote:
"lein" <boomer_the_cat@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1169508104.577383.67350@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
How can someone who couldn't stand up to her cheatin husband, stand up
to the Chicoms?
What should she have done? Divorce him? That's right wing religion at its
finest: "'Til death do us part (yeah, my *****)"
She championed---get this, yer gonna hate it--family values by NOT DIVORCING
and, instead, by working through their marital issues. Remember what a
wedding VOW is, Lein?
Apparently, she's damned for that, too, huh? Now, if she'd have been a good
conservative like Gingrich, she'd be a good candidate, huh?
"Gingrich has been married three times. In 1962, Gingrich married his first
wife, Jackie Battley, resulting in the birth of two daughters. He began to
discuss divorce with Jackie in 1981, while she was in the hospital
recovering from cancer surgery. Gingrich married his second wife, Marianne
Ginther, in the fall of 1981. [4] They divorced in 1999 because of her
dislike for Washington D.C. and other difficuties. A year later, he married
a House aide, Callista Bisek [5] amid rumors the two had an affair during
his previous marriage."
Lein, hypocrisy like yours is why I can no longer support the so-called
"right" so-called "conservative" wing. As long as -they're- the ones
doing it, it's cool. But regardless of what the opponent does, they're
considered morally inferior.
Jesus would disagree.
-c
The piety of the right is only exceeded by their hypocrisy.
ONe thing for sure, with a Hillary presidency, the FBI will have to go
to the white house to review their own files.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lobby Dosser" |
|
| Title: Re: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
23 Jan 2007 01:27:00 AM |
|
|
"lein" <boomer_the_cat@my-deja.com> wrote:
Paul J. Berg wrote:
~
With Hillary Clinton's announcement that she in the 2008 presidential
race, we should ask ourselves ~ "Do we really want another former
high school cheerleader, who worked on Barry Goldwater's 1964
presidential campaign, in The White House?" Has not six years of
George W. Bush shown us that this type of individual is not what we
need running the country.
How can someone who couldn't stand up to her cheatin husband, stand up
to the Chicoms?
What do you mean "couldn't stand up to her cheatin husband"? You got no
idea What he paid and may Still be paying.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Scratch" |
|
| Title: Re: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
22 Jan 2007 11:16:27 PM |
|
|
lein wrote:
Paul J. Berg wrote:
~
With Hillary Clinton's announcement that she in the 2008 presidential
race, we should ask ourselves ~ "Do we really want another former high
school cheerleader, who worked on Barry Goldwater's 1964 presidential
campaign, in The White House?" Has not six years of George W. Bush
shown us that this type of individual is not what we need running the
country.
How can someone who couldn't stand up to her cheatin husband, stand up
to the Chicoms?
I think somewhere along the line she made the comment she didn't know it
was going on so if true why in the world would anyone think you could
discern world matters when she wasn't even observant enough to know her
husband was cheating on her?
The rabid left is sooooo...... stupid at times.
--
"If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a
nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan
http://www.highvolumemedia.com/thebullhorn/WarOnTerror/ClintonsFailures/
\"POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE
CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON\"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul J. Berg" |
|
| Title: Re: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL CHEERLEADERS |
21 Jan 2007 10:04:27 PM |
|
|
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
"Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:2281-45B25DA2-958@storefull-3237.bay.webtv.net...
~
With Hillary Clinton's announcement that she in the 2008 presidential
race, we should ask ourselves ~ "Do we really want another former high
school cheerleader, who worked on Barry Goldwater's 1964 presidential
campaign, in The White House?" Has not six years of George W. Bush
shown us that this type of individual is not what we need running the
country.
Don't worry about it. Hillary is setting up for VP nomnation. She knows
that if she is nominated for President that they will lose the South. By
contrast, if they nominate a man and then put her as VP the South
will love it, all the rednecks down there will be saying "damn straight,
man wears the pants in the family!"
Ted
But what will the rednecks say if Barack Obama is the one wearing the
pants?
~
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
