It's the most ridiculous item of the day!

On Fox News recently, Bill O'Reilly spent a little time pontificating
on America's culture wars.

Specifically, on the subject of - yup - gay marriage.

And guess what?

Freedom-loving Bill disagrees with it.

I'm shocked.

But Bill's ramblings took a bizarre turn when he discussed the
California judges who have not prevented homosexuals from marrying in
San Francisco:

"Marriage licenses continue to be issued in San Francisco in defiance
of California state law, and one of the judges who refused to stop the
madness is James Warren," said Bill.

"James Warren is himself a homosexual, according to 'San Francisco'
magazine, begging the question as to why he did not recuse himself.
That would not have been ridiculous. That would have been fair."

Excuse me?

Well then I guess straight judges shouldn't rule on the case either,
since they'll obviously be biased against homosexuals.

Perhaps a panel of nine hermaphrodites should be assembled to rule on
the case.

I wonder - does Bill also think that black judges should recuse
themselves from racial discrimination cases?

Or that female judges should recuse themselves from sexual
discrimination cases?

Most ridiculous item of the day, indeed.


From The Democratic Underground
http://www.democraticunderground.com/

Harry