http://www.survivalistskills.com/NONEDARE.HTM
The secretive and powerful global groups behind the 'New World Order'
"None Dare Call It Conspiracy"
by Gary Allen
An astonishing and enduring classic on the secretive goals and
conspiracies of the wealthy and dynastic establishment families,
including their fostering and promoting of national and global
socialism for their own ends and their globalist dreams of World
Government.
Read this fascinating extract from 'None Dare Call It Conspiracy'...
"This act (the Federal Reserve Act) establishes the most gigantic
trust on Earth...When the President signs this act, the invisible
government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust
Investigation, will be legalized...The new law will create inflation
whenever the trusts want inflation..." Congressman Charles A.
Lindbergh Sr., December, 1913
"IN THE UNITED STATES TODAY WE HAVE IN EFFECT TWO GOVERNMENTS...We
have the duly constituted government...Then we have an independent,
uncontrolled and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve
System, operating the money powers reserved to Congress by the
Constitution." - Congressman Wright Patman, (former) Chairman of the
House Banking Committee
"Those that create and issue the money and credit direct the policies
of government and hold in their hands the destiny of the people." -
Reginald McKenna, (former) president of the Midlands Bank of England.
Chapter 3
The Money Manipulators
Many college history professors tell their charges that the books they
will be using in the class are "objective". But stop and ask yourself:
Is it possible to write a history book without a particular point of
view? There are billions of events that take place in the world each
day. To think of writing a complete history of a nation covering even
a year is to entertain a fantastic conceit.
Not only is a historian's ability to write an "objective" history
limited by the sheer volume of happenings but by the fact that many of
the most important happenings never appear in the papers or even in
somebody's memoirs. The decisions reached by the "big boys" in the
smoke-filled rooms are not reported in even the New York Times, which
ostensibly reports all the news that's fit to print. ("All the news
that fits" is a more accurate desription.)
In order to build his case, a historian must select a miniscule number
of facts from the limited number that are known. If he does not have a
"theory", how does he separate important facts from unimportant ones?
As Professor Stuart Crane has pointed out, this is why every book
"proves" its author's theory. But no book is objective. No book can be
objective and this book (NDCC) is not objective. The information in it
is true, but the book is not objective. We have carefully selected the
facts to prove our case...
Most of the facts that we bring out are readily verifiable at any
large library. But our contention is that we have arranged these facts
in the order that most accurately reflects their true significance in
history. These are the facts as the Establishment does not want you to
know them.
Have you ever had the experience of walking into a mystery movie
two-thirds of the way through? Confusing, was'nt it? All the evidence
made it look as though the butler were the murderer, but in the final
scenes you find out that, surprisingly, it was the man's wife all
along. You have to stay and see the beginning of the film. Then, as
all the pieces fall into place, the story makes sense.
This situation is similar to one millions of Americans find themselves
in today. They are confused by current happenings in the nation. They
have come in as the movie, so to speak, is going into its conclusion.
The earlier portion of the mystery is needed to make the whole thing
understandable. (Actually, we are not really starting at the
beginning, but we are going back far enough to give meaning to today's
happenings.)
In order to understand the conspiracy (to usurp the constitutional
right of governments to coin money so as to force these governments to
borrow money with usury [interest]), it is neccesary to have some
rudimentary knowledge of banking and, particularly, of international
bankers. While it would be an over- simplification to ascribe the
entire conspiracy to the international bankers, they nevertheless have
played the key role. Think of the (world) conspiracy as a hand with
one finger labeled "international banking", others labelled "charity
foundations" (i.e. Ford, Carnegie, Rockefeller Foundations, etc.), the
"anti- religion movement", "Fabian Socialism", and "Communism". But it
was the International Bankers of whom Professor Carroll Quigly (of the
Foreign Service School at Georgetown University) was speaking when we
quoted him earlier (in this book) as stating that THEIR AIM IS NOTHING
LESS THAN CONTROL OF THE WORLD THROUGH FINANCE. (Professor Quigly does
not see anything harmful in this(!), only objects to the secrecy with
which these aims are cloaked. Hence his book, a 1300 hundred page, 8
pound tome, Tragedy and Hope.) Where do governments get the enormous
amount of money they need? Most of course comes from taxation; but
governments often spend more than they are willing to tax from their
citizens and so are forced to borrow. Our national (U.S.) debt is now
(1974) 455 billion dollars - every cent of it borrowed at interest
from somewhere.
The public is led to believe that our government borrows from "the
people" through savings bonds. Actually, however, only a small
percentage of the national debt is held by individuals in this form.
Most government bonds, except those held by the government itself
through its trust funds, are held by vast banking firms known as
international banks.
For centuries there has been big money to be made by international
bankers in the financing of governments and kings. Such operators,
however, are faced with certain thorny problems. We know that smaller
banking operations protect themselves by taking collateral, but what
kind of collateral can you get from a government or a king?. What if
the banker comes to collect and the king says, "Off with his head!"
The process through which one collects a debt from a government or a
monarch is not a subject taught in the business schools of our
universities, and most of us - having never been in the business of
lending money to kings - have not given the problem much thought. But
there is a king- financing business, and to those who can ensure
collection it is lucrative indeed.
Economics professor Stuart Crane notes that there are two means used
to collateralize loans to governments and kings. Whenever a business
firm borrows big money its creditor obtains a voice in management to
protect his investment. Like a business, no government can borrow big
money unless willing to surrender to the creditor some measure of
sovereignty as collateral. Certainly, international bankers who have
loaned hundreds of billions of dollars to governments around the world
command considerable influence in the policies of such goverments.
But the ultimate advantage that the creditor has over the government
or ruler is the threat that if the borrower steps out of line the
banker can finance an enemy or rival and can even create an enemy by
such means. Therefore, if you want to stay in the king-financing
business, it is wise to have an enemy or a rival waiting in the wings
to unseat every ruler to whom you lend. If the king does'nt have an
enemy, you must create one.
Pre-eminent in playing this game was the famous House of Rothschild
(German for Redshield, a name adopted by this family for the red
shield over the front door of their house). Its founder, Meyer Amschel
Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfurt, Germany, kept one of his five
sons at home to run the Frankfurt bank, and sent the others to Paris,
London, Vienna and Naples. The Rothschilds became incredibly wealthy
during the nineteenth century by financing governments to war with one
another. According to Professor Stuart Crane:
"If you will look back at every war in Europe during the Nineteenth
Century, you will see that they always ended with the establishment of
a 'balance of power'. With every re-shuffling there was a balance of
power in a new grouping around the House of Rothschild in England,
France or Austria. They grouped nations, so that if any king stepped
out of line a war would break out and the war would be decided by
which way the financing went. Researching the debt positions of the
warring nations will usually indicate who was to be punished."
In describing the characteristics of the Rothschilds and other major
international bankers, Professor Quigly tells us that they remained
different from ordinary bankers in several ways: they were
cosmopolitan and international; they were close to governments and
were particularly concerned with government debt, including foreign
government debts; these bankers came to be called "international
bankers". (Quigly,Tragedy and Hope, p.52)
A major reason for the historical blackout on the role of the
international bankers in political history is that the Rothschilds
were Jewish. ANTI-SEMITES HAVE PLAYED INTO THE HANDS OF THE
CONSPIRACY, by trying to portray the conspiracy as a Jewish conspiracy
to rule the world. Nothing could be further from the truth! The
traditionally Anglo-Saxon J.P.Morgan and the Baptist Rockefeller
international banking institutions have played a key role in the
conspiracy. But there is no denying the importance of the Rothschilds
and their satellites. However, it is just as unreasonable and immoral
to blame the Jewish people for the crimes of the Rothschilds as it is
to hold Baptists accountable for the crimes of the Rockefellers.
The Jewish members of the conspiracy have used an organization called
the Anti-Defamation League (A.D.L.) as an instrument to try to
convince everyone that any mention of the Rothschilds or their allies
is an attack on the Jewish people. In this way they have stifled
almost all honest scholarship on international bankers and made the
subject taboo in the universities. Any individual or book exploring
this subject is immediately attacked by hundreds of A.D.L. committees
all over the country. The A.D.L. has never let truth or logic
interfere with its highly professional smear jobs... But actually,
nobody has more of a right than the Jewish people to take just
vengeance on the Rothschilds and their clique. The Jewish Warburgs
(bankers), part of the Rothschild empire, helped finance Adolph
Hitler. There were few, if any, Rothschilds or Warburgs in the Nazi
concentration camps! They sat out the war in luxurious hotels in Paris
or emigrated to the United States or England. As a group, the Jewish
people have suffered most at the hands of these power-seekers. A
Rothschild has much more in common with a Rockefeller than with a
Jewish tailor from Budapest or the Bronx. Since the keystone of the
international banking empires has been government bonds, IT HAS BEEN
IN THE INTEREST OF THESE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIERS TO ENCOURAGE
GOVERNMENT DEBT. The higher the debt, the more the interest on the
debt. Nothing drives government deeply into debt like a war (in 1935,
before the out- break of World War Two, total U.S. public debt was $28
billion 708 million, or $225.55 per capita. In 1940, before the attack
on Pearl Harbour, the public debt was $42 billion 968 million, or
$325.23 per capita. But, by 1945, with the cessation of hostilities,
it was $258 billion 682 million, or $1,848.60 per capita! -ed.); and
it has not been an uncommon practice among the international bankers
to finance both sides of the bloodiest military conflicts! For
example, during the American Civil War the North was financed by the
Rothchilds through their American agent, August Belmont, and the
American South through the Erlangers, Rothschild relatives.
But while wars and revolutions have been useful to the international
financiers in gaining or increasing control over governments, the key
to such control has always been control of money. You can control a
government if you have it in your debt; a creditor is in a position to
demand the privileges of monopoly from the sovereign. Money-seeking
governments have granted monopolies in state banking, natural
resources, oil concessions, transportation, medicine, and others.
However, the monopoly the international financiers have most coveted
is control over a nation's money.
Eventually, these bankers actually owned as private corporations the
central banks of the various European nations. The Bank of England,
Bank of France and Bank of Germany were not owned by their respective
governments, as almost everyone imagines, but were PRIVATELY-OWNED
MONOPOLIES granted by the heads of state, usually in return for loans.
Under this system, observed Reginald McKenna, president of the
Midlands Bank of England: "Those that create and issue the money and
credit direct the policies of government and hold in their hands the
destiny of the people." ONCE THE GOVERNMENT IS IN DEBT TO THE BANKERS
IT IS AT THEIR MERCY. A frightening example was cited by the London
Financial Times of September 26, 1921, which revealed that even at the
time: "Half a dozen men at the top of the Big Five Banks could upset
the whole fabric of government finance by refraining from renewing
Treasury Bills."
All those who have sought dictatorial control over modern nations have
understood the necessity of a central bank. When The League of Just
Men hired a hack revolutionary named Karl Marx to write a blue-print
for conquest called The Communist Manifesto, the fifth plank read:
"Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a
national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly." Lenin was
later to write that the establishment of a central bank was ninety
percent of communizing a country! Such conspirators knew that you
cannot take control of a nation without military force unless that
nation has a central bank through which you can control its economy.
The anarchist Bakunin sarcastically remarked of the followers of Karl
Marx: "They have one foot in the bank and one foot in the socialist
movement."
The international financiers set up their own front men in charge of
each of Europe's central banks. Professor Quigly reports:
"It must not be felt that the heads of the world's chief central banks
were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not.
Rather they were the technicians and agents of the dominent investment
bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up, and who were
perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial
powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers
(also called "international" or "mercantile" bankers) who remained
largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks.
These formed a system of international cooperation and national
dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than
that of their agents in the central banks..." (Quigly, op.cit.,
pp.326-7)
Dr. Quigly also reveals that the international bankers who owned and
controlled the Banks of England and France maintained their power even
after those Banks were theoretically socialized.
Naturally, those who controlled the central banks of Europe were eager
from the start to fasten a similar establishment on the United States.
From the earliest days, the Founding Fathers had been conscious of
attempts to control America thruogh money manipulation, and they
carried on a running battle with the international bankers. Thomas
Jefferson wrote to John Adams: "...I sincerely believe, with you, that
banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies..."
(read the rest on the webpage, i quoted about a third)
http://www.survivalistskills.com/NONEDARE.HTM
.
|
