Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned. This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions. Her dedication to the pro-life cause seems akin to
Heinrich Himmler leading kaddish at Auschwitz. Ms. McCovey best hope
that atheists are right about God and the here-after because if they
aren't, she's going to roast down yonder.
.
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 12:07:45 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in news:1107660946.696596.252140
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned. This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions. Her dedication to the pro-life cause seems akin to
Heinrich Himmler leading kaddish at Auschwitz. Ms. McCovey best hope
that atheists are right about God and the here-after because if they
aren't, she's going to roast down yonder.
The abortion battle ended 30 years ago.
Your side lost.
Get over it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Graham" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 03:45:04 AM |
|
|
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in news:1107660946.696596.252140
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned. This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions. Her dedication to the pro-life cause seems akin to
Heinrich Himmler leading kaddish at Auschwitz. Ms. McCovey best hope
that atheists are right about God and the here-after because if they
aren't, she's going to roast down yonder.
The abortion battle ended 30 years ago.
If only Roe v. Wade held up constitutionally.
Your side lost.
Get over it.
The constitution lost....
Nationalizing the abortion issue by claiming abortion is in the
constitution, and thus imposing the most liberal abortion laws on all 50
states, was the best way to make sure the issue won't go away, since so
many people in so many states were hugely unhappy with the result.
Abortion never used to be an issue for presidential elections. Now it
will never go away, because of the arrogant Supreme Court decision in
1973.
Liberals have the best track record on decisive politics, mainly because
liberal ***** judges have never been held accountable for their lies and
abuse of power.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 04:46:04 AM |
|
|
"Graham" <fdsgjkh@fghgf.gfhgh> wrote in message
news:4205E720.8C452AB8@fghgf.gfhgh...
If only Roe v. Wade held up constitutionally.
[snip rest of lies]
If only you weren't so deliberately deluded.....
Susan
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 08:07:44 AM |
|
|
Graham <fdsgjkh@fghgf.gfhgh> wrote in news:4205E720.8C452AB8@fghgf.gfhgh:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in news:1107660946.696596.252140
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned. This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions. Her dedication to the pro-life cause seems akin to
Heinrich Himmler leading kaddish at Auschwitz. Ms. McCovey best hope
that atheists are right about God and the here-after because if they
aren't, she's going to roast down yonder.
The abortion battle ended 30 years ago.
If only Roe v. Wade held up constitutionally.
It does. Case closed.
Your side lost.
Get over it.
The constitution lost....
Nationalizing the abortion issue by claiming abortion is in the
constitution, and thus imposing the most liberal abortion laws on all 50
states, was the best way to make sure the issue won't go away, since so
many people in so many states were hugely unhappy with the result.
Abortion never used to be an issue for presidential elections. Now it
will never go away, because of the arrogant Supreme Court decision in
1973.
Liberals have the best track record on decisive politics, mainly because
liberal ***** judges have never been held accountable for their lies and
abuse of power.
Why are you blaming it on liberals? It was
a Republican-dominated Supreme Court that wrote
the decision, and it has been Republican-dominated
Courts that have upheld it for the last 30 years.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Graham" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 03:46:18 AM |
|
|
Graham wrote:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in news:1107660946.696596.252140
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned. This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions. Her dedication to the pro-life cause seems akin to
Heinrich Himmler leading kaddish at Auschwitz. Ms. McCovey best hope
that atheists are right about God and the here-after because if they
aren't, she's going to roast down yonder.
The abortion battle ended 30 years ago.
If only Roe v. Wade held up constitutionally.
Your side lost.
Get over it.
The constitution lost....
Nationalizing the abortion issue by claiming abortion is in the
constitution, and thus imposing the most liberal abortion laws on all 50
states, was the best way to make sure the issue won't go away, since so
many people in so many states were hugely unhappy with the result.
Abortion never used to be an issue for presidential elections. Now it
will never go away, because of the arrogant Supreme Court decision in
1973.
Liberals have the best track record on decisive politics,
I meant, "divisive"
mainly because
liberal ***** judges have never been held accountable for their lies and
abuse of power.
word...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 02:00:08 PM |
|
|
In talk.abortion, Graham
<fdsgjkh@fghgf.gfhgh>
wrote
on Sun, 06 Feb 2005 22:45:04 +1300
<4205E720.8C452AB8@fghgf.gfhgh>:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in news:1107660946.696596.252140
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned. This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions. Her dedication to the pro-life cause seems akin to
Heinrich Himmler leading kaddish at Auschwitz. Ms. McCovey best hope
that atheists are right about God and the here-after because if they
aren't, she's going to roast down yonder.
The abortion battle ended 30 years ago.
If only Roe v. Wade held up constitutionally.
Dred Scott was revisited; Roe vs. Wade may be revisited too.
In fact, it probably will be; please choose your position.
I select [2] as being the most likely, though it depends on
the nominees Bush picks and of course the actual case brought
before the Court (which might be well after Bush leaves office!) --
there may be as many as 4 retirements prior to 2008, especially
since the Honorable Justice William Rehnquist is in treatment for
thyroid cancer.
[1] Status quo, Roe v. Wade et al reconfirmed and no changes to the
existing system.
[2] Supremes ignore the issue on a technicality and/or stare decisis.
[3] Roe v. Wade overturned; some states immediately pass anti-abortion
laws, and other states leave theirs alone; ultimately the
Supreme Court passes on whether it is legal to restrict
travel from state to state for the purpose of procuring
an operation which is illegal in the source state.
[3a] It is illegal to travel from one state to another in
order to do something considered illegal in the first state.
(See also [4].)
[3b] It is not illegal to travel from one state to another
in order to do something considered illegal in the first state.
[3b1] It is illegal to travel from one state to another
to procure an abortion for a minor.
[3b2] It is not illegal to travel from one state to another
to procure an abortion for a minor.
(See also [4].)
[4] Roe v. Wade overturned in such a fashion as to allow a partial
or total federal ban.
[4a] Rape and incest exception allowed.
[4a1] Rape alleged, prior to procedure granting.
[4a2] Rape proven (in open court), prior to procedure granting.
[4a3] Rape proven, perpetrator identified, prior to procedure
granting.
[4a4] Rape proven, perpetrator caught (or perhaps killed) [*],
prior to procedure granting.
[4a5] Rape proven, perpetrator tried and convicted, prior to
procedure granting.
[4a6] Rape proven, perpetrator tried and convicted and
sentence served, prior to procedure granting.
(Note: California law requires at least 3 year's
sentence for rape, and therefore effectively
denies the procedure. Penal code, section 264.)
[4b] Rape and incest exception denied.
[4b1] Health alleged, prior to procedure granting.
[4b2] Health evaluated, prior to procedure granting.
[4b3] Health evaluated by a licensed doctor in her or
her guardian's hire [+], prior to procedure granting.
[4b4] Health evaluated by independent medical team,
prior to procedure granting.
[4b5] Health evaluated by independent medical team,
and all court challenges (up to, if necessary,
Supreme Court) sustained, prior to procedure granting.
[4b6] Health denied.
[4bx1] Health includes mental/psychological.
[4bx2] Health does not include mental/psychological.
[5] Constitutional Amendment that would allow a total federal ban.
(AIUI, this is in the works, and has been for 30 years.)
(Did I miss any? :-) )
Note that none of these assumes anything at all about
whether a religion (hers? her guardian's? his?) considers
an abortion to be the termination of a baby's life or not.
I'm not quite sure how to factor that in -- and it's not
all that relevant for a secular legal system, barring
something really weird happening in the meantime.
Your side lost.
Get over it.
The constitution lost....
Nationalizing the abortion issue by claiming abortion is in the
constitution, and thus imposing the most liberal abortion laws on all 50
states, was the best way to make sure the issue won't go away, since so
many people in so many states were hugely unhappy with the result.
Abortion never used to be an issue for presidential elections. Now it
will never go away, because of the arrogant Supreme Court decision in
1973.
There are other decisions, as well. Doe v. Bolton, for example.
Liberals have the best track record on decisive politics, mainly because
liberal ***** judges have never been held accountable for their lies and
abuse of power.
So hold 'em accountable by voting them out. Duh.
[*] the subbranches can get a little weird, if the perp is, say,
a pimp who gets caught in a shootout. Trial
in absentia might be possible.
[+] the issue of minors having sex is an unfortunate fact of
life at present.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 07:02:00 PM |
|
|
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote in
message news:8s7id2-089.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net...
Note that none of these assumes anything at all about
whether a religion (hers? her guardian's? his?) considers
an abortion to be the termination of a baby's life or not.
That's because they don't care what OTHER people's religious beliefs are.
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
07 Feb 2005 01:00:11 AM |
|
|
In talk.abortion, Susan Cohen
<flavia13@verizon.net>
wrote
on Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:02:00 GMT
<c6zNd.21349$uc.13864@trnddc03>:
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote in
message news:8s7id2-089.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net...
Note that none of these assumes anything at all about
whether a religion (hers? her guardian's? his?) considers
an abortion to be the termination of a baby's life or not.
That's because they don't care what OTHER people's religious beliefs are.
Should they? After all, we all "know" that the One True Truth(tm)
is that the unborn preborn little innocent child baby foetus
thingy is Infinitely Precious(tm), and that moms who get
abortions to kill it are eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil.
Of course, one wonders how eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil it is to
intrude on the private lives of the citizenry in order to
enforce these notions. And here I thought the Republicans
were all for independent ownership of everything and
self-determination -- except where women are involved, I guess.
Does this seem consistent to anyone else? It sure doesn't look
all that consistent to me. The pro-choice position has its
problems, admittedly (sex-selection? abortion safety?
possibility of aborting Einstein -- or Hitler?) but at least
it doesn't require the police to arrest an arbitrary woman
coming out of a clinic. (Unless that woman owns the clinic,
perhaps, and it's been shut down and she no longer has a
license to practice. Different issue, and in that case,
they'd have a very clear notion of whom to arrest, and on
what charges.)
Susan
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 06:01:23 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:00:08 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> said in alt.atheism:
[3a] It is illegal to travel from one state to another in
order to do something considered illegal in the first state.
I can just see all the new "tourist attractions" in states that allow
abortion if all this comes to pass.
Anyone interested in a tour of the Long Island Duck? (It only takes 5
minutes, once you get there, which takes about 1-1/2 hours once you
get off the plane - assuming no heavy traffic, which is fantasy land.)
But, hey, that's why she flew to New York <nudge, nudge, wink, wink>.
That she decided to have an abortion once she got here isn't a
violation of any law.
--
"To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus
was not born of a virgin."
Cardinal Bellarmine,[1615, during the trial of Galileo]
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 06:26:31 PM |
|
|
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in
news:nobd01lulknjoclb8kv17h2t711oaj3af7@4ax.com:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:00:08 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> said in alt.atheism:
[3a] It is illegal to travel from one state to another in
order to do something considered illegal in the first state.
I can just see all the new "tourist attractions" in states that allow
abortion if all this comes to pass.
I can remember when a "Colorado vacation"
meant trip to get an abortion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 08:28:49 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:26:31 -0600, Mitchell Holman
<ta2eenNoEmail@comcast.com> said in alt.atheism:
I can remember when a "Colorado vacation"
meant trip to get an abortion.
Much too far for a NYC boy to send his girlfriend.
--
"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is
a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the
crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due
to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious
indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility
corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of
nature and of our own being."
- Albert Einstein to Guy H. Raner Jr., Sept. 28, 1949, from article by
Michael R. Gilmore in Skeptic magazine, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1997
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
09 Feb 2005 07:51:25 AM |
|
|
In article <1107660946.696596.252140@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
youngopinions@aol.com says...
This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions.
Codswallop! :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
10 Feb 2005 04:51:58 PM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <1107660946.696596.252140@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
youngopinions@aol.com says...
This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions.
Codswallop! :-)
Don't go saying words like that to Duke - he'll think it's some sort of
sex technique!
B.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
11 Feb 2005 02:18:45 PM |
|
|
Budikka666 wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
< snip >
Codswallop! :-)
Don't go saying words like that to Duke - he'll think it's some sort of
sex technique!
It isn't?
Then what the heck have I been *doing*?!
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
| User: "Arturo Magidin" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
11 Feb 2005 02:22:49 PM |
|
|
In article <374i96F5978lbU1@individual.net>,
Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
< snip >
Codswallop! :-)
Don't go saying words like that to Duke - he'll think it's some sort of
sex technique!
It isn't?
Then what the heck have I been *doing*?!
Using a fish to hit someone really hard? I mean, sounds like you've
been using cods to wallop someone...
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@math.berkeley.edu
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
12 Feb 2005 08:23:55 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <374i96F5978lbU1@individual.net>, Tukla Ratte lumbered
into the room and mumbled:
Budikka666 wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
< snip >
Codswallop! :-)
Don't go saying words like that to Duke - he'll think it's some sort of
sex technique!
It isn't?
Then what the heck have I been *doing*?!
Nobody knew but we were afraid to say anything...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
11 Feb 2005 07:32:03 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:18:45 -0600, Tukla Ratte
<tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
< snip >
Codswallop! :-)
Don't go saying words like that to Duke - he'll think it's some sort of
sex technique!
It isn't?
Then what the heck have I been *doing*?!
Is walloping the cod piece like spanking the monkey?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
12 Feb 2005 12:40:43 PM |
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:18:45 -0600, Tukla Ratte
<tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
< snip >
Codswallop! :-)
Don't go saying words like that to Duke - he'll think it's some
sort of
sex technique!
It isn't?
Then what the heck have I been *doing*?!
Is walloping the cod piece like spanking the monkey?
Neigh, Lad! You're flogging a dead horse with that....
B.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
11 Feb 2005 06:20:07 PM |
|
|
Tukla Ratte wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
< snip >
Codswallop! :-)
Don't go saying words like that to Duke - he'll think it's some
sort of
sex technique!
It isn't?
Then what the heck have I been *doing*?!
For someone who bills himself as "Tukla, Eater of Theists", I'm not
sure I want to know! ;)
B.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
12 Feb 2005 01:18:51 PM |
|
|
In article <1108075918.071851.146010@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
budikka1@netscape.net says...
Codswallop! :-)
Don't go saying words like that to Duke - he'll think it's some sort of
sex technique!
<grin>
How about 'fiddlesticks' then? :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
13 Feb 2005 06:56:16 AM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <1108075918.071851.146010@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
budikka1@netscape.net says...
Codswallop! :-)
Don't go saying words like that to Duke - he'll think it's some
sort of
sex technique!
<grin>
How about 'fiddlesticks' then? :-)
The problem is that Duke is so perverse he'd probably derive some lewd
meaning from even that! Then he'd create a lie from it about you and
start spreading it all over Usenet!
What *are* fiddle sticks, precisely, anyway?! Are they bows that you
would use with a fiddle?
B.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
14 Feb 2005 10:40:32 PM |
|
|
In article <1108299376.421041.61400@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
budikka1@netscape.net says...
What *are* fiddle sticks, precisely, anyway?! Are they bows that you
would use with a fiddle?
The Chambers dictionary just defines it as 'nonsense'.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
15 Feb 2005 04:42:38 AM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <1108299376.421041.61400@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
budikka1@netscape.net says...
What *are* fiddle sticks, precisely, anyway?! Are they bows that
you
would use with a fiddle?
The Chambers dictionary just defines it as 'nonsense'.
You'd think a dictionary called "Chambers" would have a little more
depth!
B.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
05 Feb 2005 10:01:22 PM |
|
|
Interesting perspective on who Ms. Mccovey must be. Have you had a
chance to read her biography?
This is a very un-atheistic comment.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Riain" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
05 Feb 2005 10:07:40 PM |
|
|
That is a very un-THEIST comment...
<mark2climb@mac.com> wrote in message =
news:1107662482.516609.207960@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
: Interesting perspective on who Ms. Mccovey must be. Have you had a
: chance to read her biography? =20
:=20
: This is a very un-atheistic comment.
:
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
05 Feb 2005 11:29:56 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned.
Now that she's no longer worried about an unwanted pregnancy.
Pro-lie hypcorites are real good at trying to tell other people what
to do.
This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions.
Just as you're directly responsible for the killing of hundredfs of
millions.
Murderer.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Graham" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 03:39:03 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned.
Now that she's no longer worried about an unwanted pregnancy.
Pro-lie hypcorites are real good at trying to tell other people what
to do.
She never had an abortion, retard.
This woman has been directly responsible for the slaughter
of untold millions.
Just as you're directly responsible for the killing of hundredfs of
millions.
Murderer.
Lunatic. ***** off, you pathetic pond scum.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 01:04:36 PM |
|
|
Graham <fdsgjkh@fghgf.gfhgh> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned.
Now that she's no longer worried about an unwanted pregnancy.
Pro-lie hypcorites are real good at trying to tell other people what
to do.
She never had an abortion, retard.
I didn't say that she did.
You're not too smart, are you?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
07 Feb 2005 03:41:20 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in
the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned. This woman has been directly responsible for the
slaughter
of untold millions.
Right there is where this clueless dipshit leaves reality and heads off
into la-la land, to join his so-called "pro-life" hypocrites, most of
whom are no doubt Bushites (or maybe just shites) who support the
slaughter of literally thousands of children in Iraq. They could have
saved these lives by keeping Bush out of office and the US out of Iraq,
but no, so by this Young punk's own logic, they're directly responsible
for those deaths.
And maybe they're directly responsible for the deaths of literally
millions of children from malaria in Africa, all for the want of
insecticide and medication.
And they're certianly responsible for the deaths of literally thousands
of people through the ages - deaths brought about wantonly and
intentionally by Christians in various purges, witch-hunts and
crusades.
And how about those deaths the Catholics let Hitler get away with int
he forties?
Her dedication to the pro-life cause seems akin to
Heinrich Himmler leading kaddish at Auschwitz. Ms. McCovey best hope
that atheists are right about God and the here-after because if they
aren't, she's going to roast down yonder.
Actually, no - all she has to do is ask for forgiveness on her death
bed, and she will join Hernan Cortes, Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler
and Chingis Khan for all eternity in heaven, alongside history's
bloodiest despot - god himself, who, by the Bible's own account,
slaughtered nations of people, and on one occasion, the entire
population of a planet.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Norma McCovey |
06 Feb 2005 07:43:36 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Norma McCovey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v Wade fame, has been back in
the
news again; still leading the fight to have this horrific ruling
overturned. This woman has been directly responsible for the
slaughter
of untold millions. Her dedication to the pro-life cause seems akin
to
Heinrich Himmler leading kaddish at Auschwitz. Ms. McCovey best hope
that atheists are right about God and the here-after because if they
aren't, she's going to roast down yonder.
More blind blather from a blind believer, but why are we surprised that
a addict of a robot religion wants to turn everyone else into robots,
too? Why am I surprised at the hypocrisy of these people? They follow
one of the bloodiest cults in history and have the gall to whine about
what they perceive as injustice!
The anti-abortionists are nothing but sadists. They want to bring
endless unwanted children into the world and then sit by and watch them
suffer. For if they truly wanted to end abortion, as most people
ultimately do, they would be setting up a societal infrastructure which
would obviate the necessity for it.
You need to read Newsweek for the week of January 24th, page 79,
"Connecting the Dots", where Anna Quindlen discusses Mississippi, a
state with 3m population, only one abortion clinic and the strictest
abortion laws in the US. After instituting these laws, the number of
second-trimester abortions increased by 50%. Now they've passed a bill
than bans abortions after the first trimester.
Despite this, Mississippi has the highest infant mortality rate in the
US and ranks 43rd in states regarding the number of women who have
health insurance.
Average income there is $31K. The cost of raising a child to age 18 is
$200K. Nationwide, teen birth-rate has been declining. Not in
Mississippi, where 200 children were born to girls under age 15 in 2001
22 of every 1,000 children there are abused or neglected. Where's your
concern for these? Why aren't you bitching about that, instead of
demanding that an endless parade of unwanted children be delivered to
face poverty, abuse, child molestation and neglect?
Blacks in Mississippi represent only 37% of the population, but 75% of
the abortions. A black woman earns only less than 4/5 what a white
woman earns. Mississipi has the highest percent of population living
below the poverty line, the highest percentage of women in prison,
which increased more than 13% recently. You want to abuse these women
more? Of course you do. You're a fundie. That's what fundies do.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
