| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Lady Liberty" |
| Date: |
15 Feb 2006 11:51:19 PM |
| Object: |
Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy |
http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2006-
02/15/article04.shtml
Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy
"We appreciate the Norwegian stance which is different from
Denmark," said Qaradawi.
By Farahat Al-Abbar, IOL Correspondent
DOHA, February, 15 2006, (IslamOnline.net) – The Norwegian
parliament has amended the Penal Code to criminalize blasphemy in
the wake of the republication of Danish cartoons that lampooned
Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) by a Norwegian
magazine, Christian and Muslim leaders in Norway said on Tuesday,
February 14.
"Law 150-A, which has been approved by parliament, criminalizes
blasphemy and clearly prohibits despising others or lampooning
religions in any form of expression, including the use of
photographs," Norway's Deputy Archbishop Oliva Howika told
reporters after a meeting in Doha with Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi,
the head of the International Union of Muslim Scholars.
Howika was among a Norwegian delegation that also included the
chairman of the Supreme Islamic Council in Norway, Mohamed
Hamdan.
"Under the new law, the crime of blasphemy will be punished
either by a fine or imprisonment," Howika said, promising
Qaradawi to fax him a copy of the law after being published in
the country's official gazette.
Hamdan regretted the burning of the Norwegian embassy in the
Syrian capital Damascus, but said the government had blamed the
magazine for the violent reaction.
"The Norwegian government made it clear more than one time that
it would not condone blasphemy," he said.
Last September, Denmark's mass circulation daily Jyllands-Posten
ran 12 cartoons of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). One of the photos
showed the prophet as wearing a bomb-shaped turban and another
showing him as a knife-wielding nomad flanked by shrouded women.
Many European newspapers, including the Norwegian Magazinet,
reprinted the drawings, triggering an outcry across the Muslim
world and calls to boycott Danish products and Norwegian
products.
Any image of the Prophet -- let alone biting caricatures -- is
considered blasphemous under Islam.
The editor of the Norwegian magazine at issue apologized to
Muslims on February 10, for publishing the cartoons.
Vebjoern Selbekk, who initially defended his January 10
publication of the cartoons in his magazine as an expression of
press freedom, appeared before TV cameras shaking hands after his
apology with Muslim leaders.
Apology Accepted
Hamdan (R) and Howika during the meeting with Qaradawi.
The delegation distributed copies of the magazine's apology note
to the Muslim minority after the meeting with the prominent
Muslim scholar as well as an apology translated into Arabic from
the minister of labor.
"We accepted the apology in principle," Qaradawi said. "We do
appreciate the Norwegian stance which is different from that
taken [initially] by Denmark. The Norwegian prime minister has
condemned the cartoons at the very outset."
The Danish newspaper has apologized for offending Muslims,
although not for printing the drawings.
Four months after the publication, Danish Prime Minister Anders
Fogh Rasmussen on Monday, February 13, met with a Muslim group to
discuss the fallout from the cartoons crisis. He initially
refused to meet ambassadors of Muslim countries to contain the
crisis under the pretext of free speech.
"Muslims want all people to live in peace, cooperation and love.
We don't call for strife. All people are created by God, so there
was no need for this strife," Qaradawi told reporters..
"We were deeply hurt by the cartoons. The Danish newspaper could
have defused the crisis by offering an immediate apology to the
Muslims. Had it apologized, the issue would have been resolved,"
he said.
He pointed out that there is a difference between "freedom of
expression" and freedom of insulting"
"Freedom of expression is all about expressing an opinion. In the
cartoons case, there is no opinion or counter-opinion," he said.
Qaradawi called anew on the United Nations to adopt a resolution
banning blasphemy to head off similar incidents in the future. He
also urged the European Union to criminalize blasphemy against
any religion, including pagan religions.
The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is pressing for
a ban on religious intolerance to be part of the bedrock of a
planned new United Nations human rights body.
According to the text of an OIC proposal, the new UN body should
state clearly that the "defamation of religions and prophets is
inconsistent with the right to freedom of expression" and that
states, organizations and the media have a "responsibility in
promoting tolerance and respect for religious and cultural
values."
--
Lady Liberty
http//planetarybillofrights.org/
JOBS : http://planetarybillofrights.org/jobs.htm
.
|
|
| User: "mimus" |
|
| Title: Re: Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy |
16 Feb 2006 12:34:42 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:51:19 -0600, Lady Liberty wrote:
http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2006-
02/15/article04.shtml
Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy
"We appreciate the Norwegian stance which is different from
Denmark," said Qaradawi.
By Farahat Al-Abbar, IOL Correspondent
DOHA, February, 15 2006, (IslamOnline.net) The Norwegian
parliament has amended the Penal Code to criminalize blasphemy in
the wake of the republication of Danish cartoons that lampooned
Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) by a Norwegian
magazine, Christian and Muslim leaders in Norway said on Tuesday,
February 14.
"Law 150-A, which has been approved by parliament, criminalizes
blasphemy and clearly prohibits despising others or lampooning
religions in any form of expression, including the use of
photographs," Norway's Deputy Archbishop Oliva Howika told
reporters after a meeting in Doha with Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi,
the head of the International Union of Muslim Scholars.
Howika was among a Norwegian delegation that also included the
chairman of the Supreme Islamic Council in Norway, Mohamed
Hamdan.
"Under the new law, the crime of blasphemy will be punished
either by a fine or imprisonment," Howika said, promising
Qaradawi to fax him a copy of the law after being published in
the country's official gazette.
Hamdan regretted the burning of the Norwegian embassy in the
Syrian capital Damascus, but said the government had blamed the
magazine for the violent reaction.
"The Norwegian government made it clear more than one time that
it would not condone blasphemy," he said.
Last September, Denmark's mass circulation daily Jyllands-Posten
ran 12 cartoons of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). One of the photos
showed the prophet as wearing a bomb-shaped turban and another
showing him as a knife-wielding nomad flanked by shrouded women.
Many European newspapers, including the Norwegian Magazinet,
reprinted the drawings, triggering an outcry across the Muslim
world and calls to boycott Danish products and Norwegian
products.
Any image of the Prophet -- let alone biting caricatures -- is
considered blasphemous under Islam.
The editor of the Norwegian magazine at issue apologized to
Muslims on February 10, for publishing the cartoons.
Vebjoern Selbekk, who initially defended his January 10
publication of the cartoons in his magazine as an expression of
press freedom, appeared before TV cameras shaking hands after his
apology with Muslim leaders.
Apology Accepted
Hamdan (R) and Howika during the meeting with Qaradawi.
The delegation distributed copies of the magazine's apology note
to the Muslim minority after the meeting with the prominent
Muslim scholar as well as an apology translated into Arabic from
the minister of labor.
"We accepted the apology in principle," Qaradawi said. "We do
appreciate the Norwegian stance which is different from that
taken [initially] by Denmark. The Norwegian prime minister has
condemned the cartoons at the very outset."
The Danish newspaper has apologized for offending Muslims,
although not for printing the drawings.
Four months after the publication, Danish Prime Minister Anders
Fogh Rasmussen on Monday, February 13, met with a Muslim group to
discuss the fallout from the cartoons crisis. He initially
refused to meet ambassadors of Muslim countries to contain the
crisis under the pretext of free speech.
"Muslims want all people to live in peace, cooperation and love.
We don't call for strife. All people are created by God, so there
was no need for this strife," Qaradawi told reporters..
"We were deeply hurt by the cartoons. The Danish newspaper could
have defused the crisis by offering an immediate apology to the
Muslims. Had it apologized, the issue would have been resolved,"
he said.
He pointed out that there is a difference between "freedom of
expression" and freedom of insulting"
"Freedom of expression is all about expressing an opinion. In the
cartoons case, there is no opinion or counter-opinion," he said.
Qaradawi called anew on the United Nations to adopt a resolution
banning blasphemy to head off similar incidents in the future. He
also urged the European Union to criminalize blasphemy against
any religion, including pagan religions.
The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is pressing for
a ban on religious intolerance to be part of the bedrock of a
planned new United Nations human rights body.
According to the text of an OIC proposal, the new UN body should
state clearly that the "defamation of religions and prophets is
inconsistent with the right to freedom of expression" and that
states, organizations and the media have a "responsibility in
promoting tolerance and respect for religious and cultural
values."
Well, count Norway out in the global struggle to preserve and expand
liberty.
What a spineless bunch of hypocrites, to side with the thugs who burned
their embassy over cartoonists.
--
Nothing so illuminates the end as the means.
And the means is frequently the real end.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy |
16 Feb 2006 12:38:54 PM |
|
|
(mimus) wrote in
news:xgq69snwdo32$.so5l8x27ofmy$.dlg@40tude.net:
Well, count Norway out in the global struggle to preserve and
expand liberty.
Norway has a state church; what would you expect?
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
| User: "mimus" |
|
| Title: Re: Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy |
16 Feb 2006 12:44:55 PM |
|
|
On 16 Feb 2006 18:38:54 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
tinmimus99@hotmail.com (mimus) wrote in
news:xgq69snwdo32$.so5l8x27ofmy$.dlg@40tude.net:
Well, count Norway out in the global struggle to preserve and
expand liberty.
Norway has a state church; what would you expect?
Really? is that allowed under the EU (even such as it is)?
--
Nothing so illuminates the end as the means.
And the means is frequently the real end.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy |
16 Feb 2006 12:50:48 PM |
|
|
(mimus) wrote in
news:iymc2xnb8kma$.b8ormhxubw38$.dlg@40tude.net:
On 16 Feb 2006 18:38:54 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
(mimus) wrote in
news:xgq69snwdo32$.so5l8x27ofmy$.dlg@40tude.net:
Well, count Norway out in the global struggle to preserve and
expand liberty.
Norway has a state church; what would you expect?
Really? is that allowed under the EU (even such as it is)?
Norway isn't in the EU.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
| User: "mimus" |
|
| Title: Re: Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy |
17 Feb 2006 12:20:51 PM |
|
|
On 16 Feb 2006 18:50:48 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
tinmimus99@hotmail.com (mimus) wrote in
news:iymc2xnb8kma$.b8ormhxubw38$.dlg@40tude.net:
On 16 Feb 2006 18:38:54 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
tinmimus99@hotmail.com (mimus) wrote in
news:xgq69snwdo32$.so5l8x27ofmy$.dlg@40tude.net:
Well, count Norway out in the global struggle to preserve and
expand liberty.
Norway has a state church; what would you expect?
Really? is that allowed under the EU (even such as it is)?
Norway isn't in the EU.
Ah. Ignorant Amurrican me.
But is that allowed under the EU, yadda yadda, I wonder still?
--
Nothing so illuminates the end as the means.
And the means is frequently the real end.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy |
17 Feb 2006 12:26:15 PM |
|
|
(mimus) wrote in
news:1bxqo5z9f4jqr$.1ndk887p84req.dlg@40tude.net:
On 16 Feb 2006 18:50:48 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
(mimus) wrote in
news:iymc2xnb8kma$.b8ormhxubw38$.dlg@40tude.net:
On 16 Feb 2006 18:38:54 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
(mimus) wrote in
news:xgq69snwdo32$.so5l8x27ofmy$.dlg@40tude.net:
Well, count Norway out in the global struggle to preserve and
expand liberty.
Norway has a state church; what would you expect?
Really? is that allowed under the EU (even such as it is)?
Norway isn't in the EU.
Ah. Ignorant Amurrican me.
But is that allowed under the EU, yadda yadda, I wonder still?
Probably not a problem, since the Brits still have the Church of
England with the Queen at its head, and I'm pretty sure the Danes
kept theirs, although Sweden broke the connection back in 2000.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
| User: "mimus" |
|
| Title: Re: Norway Criminalizes Blasphemy |
17 Feb 2006 12:32:48 PM |
|
|
On 17 Feb 2006 18:26:15 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
tinmimus99@hotmail.com (mimus) wrote in
news:1bxqo5z9f4jqr$.1ndk887p84req.dlg@40tude.net:
On 16 Feb 2006 18:50:48 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
tinmimus99@hotmail.com (mimus) wrote in
news:iymc2xnb8kma$.b8ormhxubw38$.dlg@40tude.net:
On 16 Feb 2006 18:38:54 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
tinmimus99@hotmail.com (mimus) wrote in
news:xgq69snwdo32$.so5l8x27ofmy$.dlg@40tude.net:
Well, count Norway out in the global struggle to preserve and
expand liberty.
Norway has a state church; what would you expect?
Really? is that allowed under the EU (even such as it is)?
Norway isn't in the EU.
Ah. Ignorant Amurrican me.
But is that allowed under the EU, yadda yadda, I wonder still?
Probably not a problem, since the Brits still have the Church of
England with the Queen at its head, and I'm pretty sure the Danes
kept theirs, although Sweden broke the connection back in 2000.
I'm not sure that the CofE gets financial assistance from taxes in the UK,
although it might be laundered through the "civil list" (I assume that's
still around) in the final form of (traditional) royal or "princely"
donations . . . .
--
Nothing so illuminates the end as the means.
And the means is frequently the real end.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|