Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers



 Politics > Politics-USA > Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: ""
Date: 09 May 2004 04:31:53 AM
Object: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers
I agree wholeheartedly with Radwa Mohammed, in this article, when she
says that the photographed tortures in the Abu Ghraib prison, done by
only a few Americans, is "defaming the West", and that Arabs are
generalizing that all Americans are brutal killers, in much the same way
that Americans have generalized that all Arabs are terrorists. There
are over-generalizations on both sides it seems.

But not all Americans are brutal sadistic killers, the world needs to
know that. Speaking as a Democrat myself, we care about the poor, the
oppressed, about fairness, human rights, and all that kind of stuff. I
don't know about Republicans, but us Democrats care about these things,
we don't support the torture of human beings anywhere, not in any way,
shape or form.

Abel Malcolm
http://www.democrats.org
______

Iraqi prisoner photos cause Arabs to doubt U.S. intentions

Abuse by GIs equated with Hussein era

Charles Levinson, Chronicle Foreign Service

Saturday, May 8, 2004

www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/05/08/MNG0P6I7S31.DTL

Cairo -- Abuses by American soldiers at Abu Ghraib prison, where Iraqis
were often tortured under Saddam Hussein, have drawn angry denunciations
in the Middle East, with many Arabs saying the shocking photos starkly
illustrate the gap between America's rhetoric of liberation and the
harsh reality of daily life in Iraq under the U.S.-led occupation.

"The prevailing attitude is anger, extreme anger about this," said Nizar
Hamzeh, a political science professor at the American University in
Beirut who is an expert in Islamic movements. "People think the United
States, judging by this, is not a defender of democracy. On the
contrary, the U.S. is no different than Saddam Hussein."

America's global status as a democratic totem seems to have exacerbated
Arab reactions to photos of the abuse that have been printed in
newspapers throughout the Middle East.

A cartoon in the Egyptian state-run daily Al Akhbar showed an Iraqi
prisoner strung up from the ceiling and attached to electrical wires.
Beside him, a U.S. soldier stands at a blackboard pointing to the words
"democracy," "human rights" and "freedom."

President Bush's apology Thursday, in which he said he was "sorry for
the humiliation suffered by the Iraqi prisoners," does not appear to
have assuaged Arab anger.

"Bush's apology is not acceptable,'' said Marwa Kamel, a 25-year-old
English teacher. "He has known about what has been happening (in Abu
Ghraib prison) for a long time, and I believe that he accepted it. But
now he is trying to claim that he rejects it."

Others, however, warned against judging all Americans by the actions of
a few.

"The American people themselves are not brutal, and torture is not their
policy," said Hisham Refaat, 44, an engineer for Casio Watch Co., who
was standing at a Cairo bus stop with three friends. He blamed the
abuses on "exceptional groups who want to inflame the dispute between
the Arabs and the Americans to pave the way for more wars."

Even among the most vocal anti-American activists, there has been praise
for the U.S. and British media for reporting mistreatment by their own
troops.

"I think we have hidden photographs about the same kinds of torture in
all Arab prisons," said Hamdeen Sabahy, an independent member of Egypt's
National Assembly and a firebrand anti-war activist. "The difference is
that we can't publish it."

Amr Abdel Rahman, a human rights researcher for the European Commission
in Cairo, agreed. "The Saddam regime used to systematically torture
their people as well,'' he said, "but we didn't see pictures on
Al-Jazeera or in the government-controlled media."

Egypt's links with Washington and charges of rights abuses at home leave
the government open to criticism in the wake of the scandal.

Noha Ahmed, a veiled, 26-year-old marketing consultant, considers the
furor over the abuse as a smoke screen for her own government. "The
Egyptian government is exaggerating this scandal," she said, "to draw
people's attention away from the misery they are living in."

Hers is a minority opinion, however, amid the many angry denunciations
of the United States.

Radwa Muhammad, 25, a smartly dressed translator in Cairo, said bitterly
that the soldiers' actions were "defaming the West" and added, "I don't
mind generalizing, because America measured all the Arabs by a few
terrorists, so now we have the right to generalize and describe all
Americans as brutal killers."

Only in Kuwait, the staunchest U.S. ally in the region, has the response
been muted.

"When they burned American bodies and the Iraqis were singing songs
celebrating this and pushing these bodies into the street, that was more
shocking for us than this," said Inaam Soud al Hassan, a member of the
Kuwait Human Rights Organization. "This is just a few naked bodies. This
wasn't as serious for us."

Some who have witnessed decades of rights abuses in the Middle East saw
the photos as proof, once again, of the brutalizing effects of war.

"I know what torture means, and I don't wish that for anyone, Iraqis or
foreigners," said Riad al-Turk, a democracy activist who was jailed by
Syria from 1981 to 1998 and rearrested in 2001, at the age of 71, for
advocating change from "dictatorship to democracy" on Al-Jazeera. But he
added: "This is how occupation forces treat the occupied people in all
places. It is practiced by Arab leaders, and it is practiced by
Americans and the British and the Israelis."

Al-Turk called for the United Nations to take over in Iraq. "They have
credibility more than any other country," he said.

Many in the region predicted that the scandal would inflame the
resistance to the occupation in Iraq and to U.S. policy throughout the
region.

"These pictures urge people to seek revenge and will strengthen the will
of the Iraqi people," said Doaa Muhammad, 24, a recent law school
graduate. "When you imagine your father and brother in that situation,
you will resist in any way you can."

Nudity and sexuality are taboo topics in Muslim cultures, so the photos
of American soldiers mocking nude detainees deeply offended Arabs and
heightened widespread feelings of shame over the perceived U.S.
subjugation of Iraqis.

Gamal Khashoggi, former editor of Saudi Arabia's Al Watan newspaper,
blamed the abuse on anti-Muslim bias in "right-wing publications in
America."

"They treat us -- the Arabs -- as if we are subhuman,'' said Khashoggi,
an adviser to the Saudi ambassador to England. "When you read those
kinds of things or are influenced by those kinds of remarks, then they
think it is OK to go and beat the hell out of some Arab, destroy their
morals, insult their pride."

Hassan Fadlallah, news director Al-Manar satellite television in
Lebanon, which is owned by the militant Muslim organization Hezbollah,
said the abuse was "adding to the hate and loathing of the Arabs and
Muslims toward the U.S. because it shows that the occupation has not
come for the Iraqis' salvation but rather for their humiliation.''

.

User: "ManWorld42"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 13 May 2004 12:36:45 AM
wrote in message news:<22942-409DFA89-85@storefull-3133.bay.webtv.net>...

I agree wholeheartedly with Radwa Mohammed, in this article, when she
says that the photographed tortures in the Abu Ghraib prison, done by
only a few Americans, is "defaming the West", and that Arabs are
generalizing that all Americans are brutal killers, in much the same way
that Americans have generalized that all Arabs are terrorists. There
are over-generalizations on both sides it seems.

Well, I doubt if too many people are so stupid as to over-generalize
to such an extent. Nonetheless, the photos do prove that the US way
of life do not automatically guarantee moral superiority. The problem
is that the only justification left for the war in Iraq now rests on
the moral superiority of the US system of government. I was watching
Lynndie England's interview on Sixty Minutes 2 tonight, and she
admitted that those abuses were done specifically to target the taboos
of the Iraqi people. If the abuses were systemic, they will reflect
very bad on the US.

But not all Americans are brutal sadistic killers, the world needs to
know that. Speaking as a Democrat myself, we care about the poor, the
oppressed, about fairness, human rights, and all that kind of stuff. I
don't know about Republicans, but us Democrats care about these things,
we don't support the torture of human beings anywhere, not in any way,
shape or form.

Well Abel, were you in a war? How can you guarantee that you will
fare any better than those accused of the abuses. If you were never
in a war, then you are full of it. People of all cultures and
nationalities have been known to commit atrocities in times of war.
Take the Japanese for example. A couple of weeks ago, PBS had a news
segment portraying them as a cultured and civilized people with great
respect for the social order. In Japan, you don't even need to take
your key out of your motorcycle when you are away from it for goodness
sake. Nonetheless, the Japanese army committed countless atrocities
in Asia during the Second World War. Why? It was a war stupid. It
is not right. It is because war is hell.

Abel Malcolm
http://www.democrats.org

[deleted]
.

User: "Sigourney Smoley"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 11 May 2004 10:38:12 PM
wrote in message news:<22942-409DFA89-85@storefull-3133.bay.webtv.net>...

I agree wholeheartedly with Radwa Mohammed, in this article, when she
says that the photographed tortures in the Abu Ghraib prison, done by
only a few Americans, is "defaming the West", and that Arabs are
generalizing that all Americans are brutal killers, in much the same way
that Americans have generalized that all Arabs are terrorists. There
are over-generalizations on both sides it seems.

The US is in dialogue with itself. The idea that only a few Americans
were involved is utter nonsense. The White House definitely knew that
Iraqis were being tortured.
The vast majority of the rapes and sexual assaults were not filmed.
It would be entirely dishonest to suggest that the jail scandal did
not have additional culprits in the US.
The abuses were known about by hundreds of Americans. The Iaqi
civilian workers and translators spread the bad news to the streets of
Iraq. The abuses in all their horrid detail were suspected by many
Iraqis.


But not all Americans are brutal sadistic killers, the world needs to
know that. Speaking as a Democrat myself, we care about the poor, the
oppressed, about fairness, human rights, and all that kind of stuff.

Any American who did not honestly think the Iraqi prisoners were being
tortured was being rather naive. The current debate in the US is
intrinsically racist. The victims have been excluded from the debate
whilst the 'stupid white men' have been talking amongst themselves.

I
don't know about Republicans, but us Democrats care about these things,
we don't support the torture of human beings anywhere, not in any way,
shape or form.

Abel Malcolm
http://www.democrats.org

Torture was definitely the policy according to the Red Cross. The
American people might want to vote for a President who is opposed to
torture. The problem with Abu Ghraib was that it was too American
rather than not American enough.
.
User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 12 May 2004 11:35:51 AM
On Tue, 11 May 2004 20:38:12 -0700, Sigourney Smoley wrote:

Any American who did not honestly think the Iraqi prisoners were being
tortured was being rather naive.

Anyone who equates the paint spread by the broad brush term of "Iraqui"
and uses it to generalize the identity of prisoners as equals to all
"Iraqui" people, has an agenda of propaganda to frame and hang in the
Gallery of political Arts devoted to the culture of Animal Farms.
.


User: "PagCal"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 09 May 2004 05:40:10 AM

Not all Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers

No, you've got it wrong. All Americans can easily become sadistic
killers. Read the referenced experiments at Stanford University to see
that this is so.
Read on ...
---
Bush is trying to defuse the latest Iraqi torture pics as the work of
a few rogue Americans, but this is simply not the case.
If you read through the attached link and summary, it's clear that
this propensity of evil exists within all of us.
The only way we are able to operate in a humane way, is through
social structures that reinforce this behavior.
Bush must take the blame, as the commander in chief, for not setting
up and monitoring these structures.
http://www.prisonexp.org/
A Simulation Study of the
Psychology of Imprisonment
Conducted at Stanford University
Welcome to the Stanford Prison Experiment web site, which features an
extensive slide show and information about this classic psychology
experiment. What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does
humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? These are some of the
questions we posed in this dramatic simulation of prison life conducted
in the summer of 1971 at Stanford University.
How we went about testing these questions and what we found may astound
you. Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison
life had to be ended prematurely after only six days because of what the
situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a
few days, our guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed
and showed signs of extreme stress. Please join me on a slide tour of
describing this experiment and uncovering what it tells us about the
nature of Human Nature.
.
User: "Bob"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 09 May 2004 10:22:38 AM
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:109s2kb220kp025@corp.supernews.com...

Not all Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers


No, you've got it wrong. All Americans can easily become sadistic
killers. Read the referenced experiments at Stanford University to see
that this is so.

Since you use "can become", it would apply
to any nationality ... which makes it
meaningless.
.

User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 08 May 2004 07:02:40 AM
On Sun, 09 May 2004 06:40:10 -0400, PagCal wrote:

Not all Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers


No, you've got it wrong. All Americans can easily become sadistic
killers. Read the referenced experiments at Stanford University to see
that this is so.

Read on ...

---

Bush is trying to defuse the latest Iraqi torture pics as the work of
a few rogue Americans, but this is simply not the case.

A structure born of imorality brought on by Liberal control of the
education system which has changed the product of this generation
and has painted itself into the picture of man for all to see, and
you want to make implications that the results of Liberialism is the
fault of the Right and Bush? Typical.


If you read through the attached link and summary, it's clear that
this propensity of evil exists within all of us.

Keep that in mind.


The only way we are able to operate in a humane way, is through
social structures that reinforce this behavior.

The social structure the Left has brought forth in America has
become exactally NOT what you describe. All the rules are by the wayside
and the brave new world of young Americans are expressing exactally what
they were taught to do, nothing more, nothing less. Congradulations my
Dear Socialist Marxist, you have won your battle for the minds of the
American youth and they are paving the streets of the world with the
stones you provided them.


Bush must take the blame, as the commander in chief, for not setting
up and monitoring these structures.

If the character flaws are in and part of all mankind as you point out,
how then is it that you can focus on one individual as the "Blame" for
a flaw that is inherient in all mankind?
I must correct you by way of your own words so that truth takes
precidence above bias.
Bush can be responsible for only 1/(Total Humans Alive). In other words
he can only be responsible for his own actions. If his action is to
make all mankind face the problem and know that 'the acts' are inherent
and latent in all of us, then he will be a great leader. If on the other
hand he chooses the path you have laid out for him, what do you suppose
the outcome will be if Bush elects to become a 'Jesus Christ' and take
on the blame for a flaw that plagues the whole world of man?
Still think Bush should take the blame? Or, would you rather he take
the action of leading the world into a better understanding of itself?
If there is forgiveness in him, can he use it to ignite the fire of
understanding? Is it possible to stop the designs of Islam to conquer
the world and find a solution to appease it into stopping it's motion?
If you were in Bush's shoes at the moment, and know what he knows, what
course of action would you take? I am curious as to how your projection
of thought into the apex of the pyramid of world power would effect me,
my life, and my neighbors around me, and especally all my Hacker friends.
I do not expect links from you, I expect you to in your own words tell
me how you would handle the problems of the world. Impress me.


http://www.prisonexp.org/

A Simulation Study of the
Psychology of Imprisonment
Conducted at Stanford University

Welcome to the Stanford Prison Experiment web site, which features an
extensive slide show and information about this classic psychology
experiment. What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does
humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? These are some of the
questions we posed in this dramatic simulation of prison life conducted
in the summer of 1971 at Stanford University.

How we went about testing these questions and what we found may astound
you. Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison
life had to be ended prematurely after only six days because of what the
situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a
few days, our guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed
and showed signs of extreme stress. Please join me on a slide tour of
describing this experiment and uncovering what it tells us about the
nature of Human Nature.

.
User: "Kel"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 10 May 2004 02:07:34 PM
"00:00:00Hg" <snack@tack.crucnh> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.05.08.12.02.37.351295@tack.crucnh...

On Sun, 09 May 2004 06:40:10 -0400, PagCal wrote:

Not all Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers


No, you've got it wrong. All Americans can easily become sadistic
killers. Read the referenced experiments at Stanford University to see
that this is so.

Read on ...

---

Bush is trying to defuse the latest Iraqi torture pics as the work of
a few rogue Americans, but this is simply not the case.


A structure born of imorality brought on by Liberal control of the
education system which has changed the product of this generation
and has painted itself into the picture of man for all to see, and
you want to make implications that the results of Liberialism is the
fault of the Right and Bush? Typical.

No, the problems have come from Rumsfeld and the formation of a Guantanamo
style prison system and the US deciding it didn't give a monkeys about the
Geneva Convention after 9-11. From Rumsfeld dismissing Geneva it's a very
short journey to the end of the dog lead Miss England held round that Iraqis
throat.
The fish rots from the head. Fire Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz.
.
User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 10 May 2004 02:53:27 PM
On Mon, 10 May 2004 20:07:34 +0100, Kel wrote:

The fish rots from the head. Fire Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz.

On that I agree. It does not remove the fact however, that
liberal control of institutions have debased the morals
of youth so that as to allow them to act out what they have
been taught in the real world and reflect upon us all an image
of social entropy.
Just today oral sex has been pronounced as an alternative for youth
to prevent pregnancy, endorsed by the British government.
Were one to look at all of this with a clinical eye he would
conclude that sanity has deserted the human race.
There are no forbiden fruit left on the tree.
.


User: "JohnAndrew"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 10 May 2004 10:24:22 PM
Hg, I am happen to be a "Socialist Marxist," and I think
you're a little over the top in attributing all the social
ills of American society to the "Left."
At least the way
I look at the world, the socialist left has never come
close to holding power in the United States - which maybe
is a good thing, considering what Communism did in Stalin's
Russia.
If you want to complain about the liberal welfare state
and the culture of instant gratification in which many
American teenagers live - well, you may be right about some
of the character flaws they create. But (a) youth culture
is partly the creation of BUSINESS - of the TV and movie
industry, with hard-eyed businessmen in charge looking
for what sells, and profiting from the marketing of fad
after fad after fad to the public.
Yeah, some Hollywood types are leftists, and the TV/movie
business may appeal a lot to some populist themes. But
the movie and TV business is run for profit, just like any
other business, and people like me don't control it.
I guess you're saying that rightwing Republicans like you
don't control the culture business either. Fair enough. But
just because you're not in control doesn't mean that I am.
And I refuse to take responsibility for a popular American
culture that promotes violence on TV to sell products and
that often enough profits from promoting war, when I've been
marching against war since I was in college.
Another potential source of American violence, I also will
argue, lies in this country's quite violent social history -
you know, slavery, the Civil War, the Mexican War, the wars
to displace the Indians, the shootouts between cattle ranchers
and sheep growers in the Old West, the wars between rival
bootleggers in Prohibition-era Chicago.
All this fighting throughout American history may have been
a good or a bad thing, depending on your perspective. But
it's left this society with an amazingly violent culture, with
a culture that entertains itself by watching fictional killings
on TV. And it isn't all the fault of the American left, which
anyway is fairly tiny.
It seems to me that the real point of the Stanford experiments,
though, is not that AMERICANS are potential torturers, but that
ALL human beings are. If you're a rightwing Christian, you might
say that all of us have sinned and come short of the glory of
God; none of us is completely blameless at heart.
Again if you happen to be a rightwing Christian, which maybe
you're not, doesn't it make sense for all of us to admit this?
And to look at the "beam" in our own eyes rather than the speck
of dust clogging up our neighbor's vision, as Jesus advised his
followers in the Sermon on the Mount?
If you're not a rightwing Christian, if you're some kind of
Social Darwinist/atheist, maybe, I don't see why you would be
surprised at every human being's innate capacity for violence.
But I really don't know what you're thinking here, so maybe
I shouldn't try to put words in your mouth.
I do want to say
that if you're going to blame me, as a "Socialist Marxist,"
for the current condition of the United States, then I want to
have my own secret police force and effective ownership over
all of the factories, oil companies and government agencies.
I'm just not going to accept that "Socialist Marxists" should
get the blame for this society when we don't have any real power.
"00:00:00Hg" <snack@tack.crucnh> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.05.08.12.02.37.351295@tack.crucnh>...

On Sun, 09 May 2004 06:40:10 -0400, PagCal wrote:

Not all Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers


No, you've got it wrong. All Americans can easily become sadistic
killers. Read the referenced experiments at Stanford University to see
that this is so.

Read on ...

---

Bush is trying to defuse the latest Iraqi torture pics as the work of
a few rogue Americans, but this is simply not the case.


A structure born of imorality brought on by Liberal control of the
education system which has changed the product of this generation
and has painted itself into the picture of man for all to see, and
you want to make implications that the results of Liberialism is the
fault of the Right and Bush? Typical.



If you read through the attached link and summary, it's clear that
this propensity of evil exists within all of us.


Keep that in mind.


The only way we are able to operate in a humane way, is through
social structures that reinforce this behavior.


The social structure the Left has brought forth in America has
become exactally NOT what you describe. All the rules are by the wayside
and the brave new world of young Americans are expressing exactally what
they were taught to do, nothing more, nothing less. Congradulations my
Dear Socialist Marxist, you have won your battle for the minds of the
American youth and they are paving the streets of the world with the
stones you provided them.



Bush must take the blame, as the commander in chief, for not setting
up and monitoring these structures.


If the character flaws are in and part of all mankind as you point out,
how then is it that you can focus on one individual as the "Blame" for
a flaw that is inherient in all mankind?

I must correct you by way of your own words so that truth takes
precidence above bias.

Bush can be responsible for only 1/(Total Humans Alive). In other words
he can only be responsible for his own actions. If his action is to
make all mankind face the problem and know that 'the acts' are inherent
and latent in all of us, then he will be a great leader. If on the other
hand he chooses the path you have laid out for him, what do you suppose
the outcome will be if Bush elects to become a 'Jesus Christ' and take
on the blame for a flaw that plagues the whole world of man?

Still think Bush should take the blame? Or, would you rather he take
the action of leading the world into a better understanding of itself?
If there is forgiveness in him, can he use it to ignite the fire of
understanding? Is it possible to stop the designs of Islam to conquer
the world and find a solution to appease it into stopping it's motion?

If you were in Bush's shoes at the moment, and know what he knows, what
course of action would you take? I am curious as to how your projection
of thought into the apex of the pyramid of world power would effect me,
my life, and my neighbors around me, and especally all my Hacker friends.

I do not expect links from you, I expect you to in your own words tell
me how you would handle the problems of the world. Impress me.




http://www.prisonexp.org/

A Simulation Study of the
Psychology of Imprisonment
Conducted at Stanford University

Welcome to the Stanford Prison Experiment web site, which features an
extensive slide show and information about this classic psychology
experiment. What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does
humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? These are some of the
questions we posed in this dramatic simulation of prison life conducted
in the summer of 1971 at Stanford University.

How we went about testing these questions and what we found may astound
you. Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison
life had to be ended prematurely after only six days because of what the
situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a
few days, our guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed
and showed signs of extreme stress. Please join me on a slide tour of
describing this experiment and uncovering what it tells us about the
nature of Human Nature.

.

User: "Juan M. Gandia Sanmartin"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 10 May 2004 06:50:40 PM
On Sat, 08 May 2004 07:02:40 -0500, "00:00:00Hg" <snack@tack.crucnh>
wrote:
Dear NG Companions
As first I must apologize for my poor knowledge of the English
language. It would be a pity if you don't understand/misunderstand
what I will write next.
It was a very interesting discussion about Americans and Sadism.
I'm sure that in the whole America's population there is only a few
number of persons that would consciously do injures or willingly
humiliate another persons and these few persons are insane. I'm sure
that if these guards at the Iraq prison would have seen during his
civil life a film in which would appear soldiers doing that what they
have done, they would be shocked and would have said that such thigs
are criminal.
The question is: Why they have done that if normally they would not
do?
Usually we say that people don't do many criminal things because:
a) You have got a education at home showing you what is wrong and what
is right.
b) There is a society which has developed rules of living together and
also the power to punish the wrongdoer.
But now again the question: Why the Hell they have done that?
IMHO I think is a mix of fail of above expressed rules.
I'm a Spaniard and I'm observing here in Spain too that in the last
time parents are more and more not accepting his primary
responsability of giving a social education to his children.
They are giving excuses such as " this is a matter of the school"
or "this child is an evil. I try but it's impossible to educate him"
The truth is that to social educate a children is a very difficult job
today and if you want to have any succes, you must begin very early
and wear a lot of patience. If you want begin when the child has four
years, sorry but it's too late. The children has learned other things
and now is listening the voices of the exterior and no more papa and
mama.
Well, we have now one of the problems: childrens that don't have had a
social education at home are potential wrongdoers but most of them
don't do anything wrong in his full life. Why??
Because the exterior voices that he/she was listening in its youth
and, probably, his own life experience show them that there is a big
trouble if you violate the rules of the established society. And so
many potential wrongdoers are only bad drivers or, occasionally,
bothering or offending other people.
But in the case of the guards of the Iraq prison, they are gone too
far. And the question is: Why??
I think that it was because the two barriers which prevents us from
doing such a miserable act (social education and law) were not present
at all in this prison.
I can understand the fault of social education in a person ( it's a
pity but ***** happens) but if I were an American citizen I would never
accept that the person which was responsible for the application of
the law in the territory under his charge would accept such sadistic
acts without punish it. It is again the image of America. You gave him
a duty and he was running away from the enemy.
If you were a employer and you have a worker that when you are not
present, stop to work and goes to the bar. Would you accept it?
Certainly not. Allright then, please, think the following: You are in
a ship, a big one with more than 200 millions passengers. The ship is
called US America and you have a captain, a pilot and so far, a crew.
But all these persons, no matter how important they are, THEY ARE YOUR
WORKERS. They are here to bring the ship in a safe, nice harbour and
not to make this ship his personal Love Boat.
It is my humble opinion
Juan

On Sun, 09 May 2004 06:40:10 -0400, PagCal wrote:

Not all Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers


No, you've got it wrong. All Americans can easily become sadistic
killers. Read the referenced experiments at Stanford University to see
that this is so.

Read on ...

---

Bush is trying to defuse the latest Iraqi torture pics as the work of
a few rogue Americans, but this is simply not the case.


A structure born of imorality brought on by Liberal control of the
education system which has changed the product of this generation
and has painted itself into the picture of man for all to see, and
you want to make implications that the results of Liberialism is the
fault of the Right and Bush? Typical.



If you read through the attached link and summary, it's clear that
this propensity of evil exists within all of us.


Keep that in mind.


The only way we are able to operate in a humane way, is through
social structures that reinforce this behavior.


The social structure the Left has brought forth in America has
become exactally NOT what you describe. All the rules are by the wayside
and the brave new world of young Americans are expressing exactally what
they were taught to do, nothing more, nothing less. Congradulations my
Dear Socialist Marxist, you have won your battle for the minds of the
American youth and they are paving the streets of the world with the
stones you provided them.



Bush must take the blame, as the commander in chief, for not setting
up and monitoring these structures.


If the character flaws are in and part of all mankind as you point out,
how then is it that you can focus on one individual as the "Blame" for
a flaw that is inherient in all mankind?

I must correct you by way of your own words so that truth takes
precidence above bias.

Bush can be responsible for only 1/(Total Humans Alive). In other words
he can only be responsible for his own actions. If his action is to
make all mankind face the problem and know that 'the acts' are inherent
and latent in all of us, then he will be a great leader. If on the other
hand he chooses the path you have laid out for him, what do you suppose
the outcome will be if Bush elects to become a 'Jesus Christ' and take
on the blame for a flaw that plagues the whole world of man?

Still think Bush should take the blame? Or, would you rather he take
the action of leading the world into a better understanding of itself?
If there is forgiveness in him, can he use it to ignite the fire of
understanding? Is it possible to stop the designs of Islam to conquer
the world and find a solution to appease it into stopping it's motion?

If you were in Bush's shoes at the moment, and know what he knows, what
course of action would you take? I am curious as to how your projection
of thought into the apex of the pyramid of world power would effect me,
my life, and my neighbors around me, and especally all my Hacker friends.

I do not expect links from you, I expect you to in your own words tell
me how you would handle the problems of the world. Impress me.




http://www.prisonexp.org/

A Simulation Study of the
Psychology of Imprisonment
Conducted at Stanford University

Welcome to the Stanford Prison Experiment web site, which features an
extensive slide show and information about this classic psychology
experiment. What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does
humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? These are some of the
questions we posed in this dramatic simulation of prison life conducted
in the summer of 1971 at Stanford University.

How we went about testing these questions and what we found may astound
you. Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison
life had to be ended prematurely after only six days because of what the
situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a
few days, our guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed
and showed signs of extreme stress. Please join me on a slide tour of
describing this experiment and uncovering what it tells us about the
nature of Human Nature.


.
User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 10 May 2004 08:12:16 PM
On Mon, 10 May 2004 23:50:40 +0000, Juan M. Gandia Sanmartin wrote:

On Sat, 08 May 2004 07:02:40 -0500, "00:00:00Hg" <snack@tack.crucnh>
wrote:

Dear NG Companions
As first I must apologize for my poor knowledge of the English
language. It would be a pity if you don't understand/misunderstand
what I will write next.

I understand and conclude we see eye to eye.
The time has come for the people of the world to rise up in one voice
as seperate and unique Nations and cultures and take from each the best
of thought and combine the matrix into a unified Mandate for all
governments of the world. Not a "United Nations". I said "Unique".
If the established cultures of the world are unified as the United
Nations would direct, we will be faced with with curtural entropy.

Each country and it's cultures must remain intact as autonomous
entities.
I believe the United States should follow it's own Constitution and
keep out of the affairs of other nations. I also believe China should
restore the Dali Lama to Tibet and pay repairations to it's peoples.
I am sure that both the US and China will do that as they have now seen
my disapproval.
I also believe the world has a problem and it's name is Islam.
Islam has declared it's superiority and is extending it's reach.
As if by hypnosis nations are falling into it's grasp. Even in
America Islam is revered above all religions by the Satanic Left
and the Democratic Party.
.
User: "Erik A. Mattila"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 10 May 2004 09:20:10 PM
00:00:00Hg wrote:

On Mon, 10 May 2004 23:50:40 +0000, Juan M. Gandia Sanmartin wrote:


On Sat, 08 May 2004 07:02:40 -0500, "00:00:00Hg" <snack@tack.crucnh>
wrote:

Dear NG Companions
As first I must apologize for my poor knowledge of the English
language. It would be a pity if you don't understand/misunderstand
what I will write next.



I understand and conclude we see eye to eye.

The time has come for the people of the world to rise up in one voice
as seperate and unique Nations and cultures and take from each the best
of thought and combine the matrix into a unified Mandate for all
governments of the world. Not a "United Nations". I said "Unique".

If the established cultures of the world are unified as the United
Nations would direct, we will be faced with with curtural entropy.

Each country and it's cultures must remain intact as autonomous
entities.

I believe the United States should follow it's own Constitution and
keep out of the affairs of other nations. I also believe China should
restore the Dali Lama to Tibet and pay repairations to it's peoples.
I am sure that both the US and China will do that as they have now seen
my disapproval.

I also believe the world has a problem and it's name is Islam.

Islam has declared it's superiority and is extending it's reach.
As if by hypnosis nations are falling into it's grasp. Even in
America Islam is revered above all religions by the Satanic Left
and the Democratic Party.

Wait a minute...I thought it was White Christian Nations that tried to
conquer the world and impose its values everywhere more or less by the
sword. Have I been reading the wrong history books?
eam


.
User: ""

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 16 May 2004 08:35:15 AM

emattila@oco.net wrote:

Islam is revered above all religions by the
Satanic Left and the Democratic Party.


Wait a minute...I thought it was White
Christian Nations that tried to conquer the
world and impose its values everywhere
more or less by the sword. Have I been
reading the wrong history books?
eam


Thank you, Erik. You are absolutely right about that, it is the White
Christian nations that are trying to conquer the world and impose their
phony "democratic" values.

Where did that weirdo come from? What country is he/she/it from? Since
when was Islam revered in America? And how dare this creep lump the
"Satanic Left" with the Democratic Party! Who's the Satanic Left
anyways? Would that be Osama bin Laden, because he's a Republican, so
that would make him one of the "Satanic Right", along with Jerry
Fallwell, Pat Robertson, Jeb Bush, e.t.c.

Yeah, "Satanic Right" sounds better. But then is Satan every right?
That would be an oxymoron, you know, like "compassionate conservative".
Abel Malcolm
Send Bush to Iraq - Bring our troops home
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Educate yourself & go to these links:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6164.htm &
www.moveon.org & www.salon.com & www.buzzflash.com &
www.democracynow.org & www.democrats.org & www.bushwatch.com &
www.americanprogress.org
.
User: "Erik A. Mattila"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 16 May 2004 07:36:19 PM
wrote:

emattila@oco.net wrote:

Islam is revered above all religions by the
Satanic Left and the Democratic Party.




Wait a minute...I thought it was White
Christian Nations that tried to conquer the
world and impose its values everywhere
more or less by the sword. Have I been
reading the wrong history books?
eam


Thank you, Erik. You are absolutely right about that, it is the White
Christian nations that are trying to conquer the world and impose their
phony "democratic" values.

Where did that weirdo come from? What country is he/she/it from? Since
when was Islam revered in America? And how dare this creep lump the
"Satanic Left" with the Democratic Party! Who's the Satanic Left
anyways? Would that be Osama bin Laden, because he's a Republican, so
that would make him one of the "Satanic Right", along with Jerry
Fallwell, Pat Robertson, Jeb Bush, e.t.c.

Yeah, "Satanic Right" sounds better. But then is Satan every right?
That would be an oxymoron, you know, like "compassionate conservative".

Abel Malcolm

You're welcome, Abel. I don't know about Satan - the only thing I've
ever really read about this entity is Mark Twain's "Letters from the
Earth." Satan had a pretty good sense of humor by that account. He
would really be laughing these days, I think.
Erik


Send Bush to Iraq - Bring our troops home

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Educate yourself & go to these links:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6164.htm &
www.moveon.org & www.salon.com & www.buzzflash.com &
www.democracynow.org & www.democrats.org & www.bushwatch.com &
www.americanprogress.org

.
User: "James Brock"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 17 May 2004 05:15:45 PM
"Erik A. Mattila" <emattila@oco.net> wrote in message
news:40A80903.5020308@oco.net...



AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote:

emattila@oco.net wrote:

Islam is revered above all religions by the
Satanic Left and the Democratic Party.




Wait a minute...I thought it was White
Christian Nations that tried to conquer the
world and impose its values everywhere
more or less by the sword. Have I been
reading the wrong history books?
eam


Thank you, Erik. You are absolutely right about that, it is the

White

Christian nations that are trying to conquer the world and impose their
phony "democratic" values.

Where did that weirdo come from? What country is he/she/it from? Since
when was Islam revered in America? And how dare this creep lump the
"Satanic Left" with the Democratic Party! Who's the Satanic Left
anyways? Would that be Osama bin Laden, because he's a Republican, so
that would make him one of the "Satanic Right", along with Jerry
Fallwell, Pat Robertson, Jeb Bush, e.t.c.

Yeah, "Satanic Right" sounds better. But then is Satan every right?
That would be an oxymoron, you know, like "compassionate conservative".

Abel Malcolm


You're welcome, Abel. I don't know about Satan - the only thing I've
ever really read about this entity is Mark Twain's "Letters from the
Earth." Satan had a pretty good sense of humor by that account. He
would really be laughing these days, I think.

Erik

Stupid idiots. There is no Satan.



Send Bush to Iraq - Bring our troops home

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Educate yourself & go to these links:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6164.htm &
www.moveon.org & www.salon.com & www.buzzflash.com &
www.democracynow.org & www.democrats.org & www.bushwatch.com &
www.americanprogress.org


.
User: "Erik A. Mattila"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 17 May 2004 07:01:14 PM
James Brock wrote:

"Erik A. Mattila" <emattila@oco.net> wrote in message
news:40A80903.5020308@oco.net...


AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote:

emattila@oco.net wrote:


Islam is revered above all religions by the
Satanic Left and the Democratic Party.



Wait a minute...I thought it was White
Christian Nations that tried to conquer the
world and impose its values everywhere
more or less by the sword. Have I been
reading the wrong history books?
eam


Thank you, Erik. You are absolutely right about that, it is the


White

Christian nations that are trying to conquer the world and impose their
phony "democratic" values.

Where did that weirdo come from? What country is he/she/it from? Since
when was Islam revered in America? And how dare this creep lump the
"Satanic Left" with the Democratic Party! Who's the Satanic Left
anyways? Would that be Osama bin Laden, because he's a Republican, so
that would make him one of the "Satanic Right", along with Jerry
Fallwell, Pat Robertson, Jeb Bush, e.t.c.

Yeah, "Satanic Right" sounds better. But then is Satan every right?
That would be an oxymoron, you know, like "compassionate conservative".

Abel Malcolm


You're welcome, Abel. I don't know about Satan - the only thing I've
ever really read about this entity is Mark Twain's "Letters from the
Earth." Satan had a pretty good sense of humor by that account. He
would really be laughing these days, I think.

Erik


Stupid idiots. There is no Satan.

Then who is your lord and master, David...er, I mean James?



Send Bush to Iraq - Bring our troops home

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Educate yourself & go to these links:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6164.htm &
www.moveon.org & www.salon.com & www.buzzflash.com &
www.democracynow.org & www.democrats.org & www.bushwatch.com &
www.americanprogress.org




.




User: "JohnAndrew"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 11 May 2004 06:32:10 AM
Erik - You're partly right, but only partly.
For the last
1,300 years or so, militant Islam and militant Christianity
have taken turns trying to conquer the world, haven't they?
And they're not the only civilizations to have gone on a
rampage of conquest and exploitation when they felt they
could get away with it.
The kingdom of Burma, of all places, was engaged in regional
wars of expansion and the enslavement of neighboring peoples
up until the early 1800s, when the British carved up Burma
in three wars and imposed their own - er - "benevolent" rule
on a fractious people.
In West Africa during the centuries of the Atlantic Slave Trade,
there were local kingdoms and city states whose leaders cheerfully
conquered and enslaved their neighbors in order to sell them
to the Europeans and Americans. It wasn't either Islam or Christianity
that inspired a lot of these guys - just normal human bloody-mindedness
and a willingness to kick butt for fun and profit.
So we're all potentially culpable, aren't we? I'm not saying
this justifies what the US has done at Abu Ghraib, or what
al Qaeda claims credit for having done at the World Trade
Towers, or what the Israelis and Palestinians are busy doing
to each other.
But isn't there a lot of evidence that when given the chance
and the motivation, people of all colors, races and creeds
can be sadistic buttheads?
*****
"Erik A. Mattila" <emattila@oco.net> wrote in message news:<40A0385A.70001@oco.net>...

00:00:00Hg wrote:

On Mon, 10 May 2004 23:50:40 +0000, Juan M. Gandia Sanmartin wrote:


On Sat, 08 May 2004 07:02:40 -0500, "00:00:00Hg" <snack@tack.crucnh>
wrote:

Dear NG Companions
As first I must apologize for my poor knowledge of the English
language. It would be a pity if you don't understand/misunderstand
what I will write next.



I understand and conclude we see eye to eye.

The time has come for the people of the world to rise up in one voice
as seperate and unique Nations and cultures and take from each the best
of thought and combine the matrix into a unified Mandate for all
governments of the world. Not a "United Nations". I said "Unique".

If the established cultures of the world are unified as the United
Nations would direct, we will be faced with with curtural entropy.

Each country and it's cultures must remain intact as autonomous
entities.

I believe the United States should follow it's own Constitution and
keep out of the affairs of other nations. I also believe China should
restore the Dali Lama to Tibet and pay repairations to it's peoples.
I am sure that both the US and China will do that as they have now seen
my disapproval.

I also believe the world has a problem and it's name is Islam.

Islam has declared it's superiority and is extending it's reach.
As if by hypnosis nations are falling into it's grasp. Even in
America Islam is revered above all religions by the Satanic Left
and the Democratic Party.


Wait a minute...I thought it was White Christian Nations that tried to
conquer the world and impose its values everywhere more or less by the
sword. Have I been reading the wrong history books?

eam


.
User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 11 May 2004 11:54:03 AM
On Tue, 11 May 2004 04:32:10 -0700, JohnAndrew wrote:

Erik - You're partly right, but only partly.

For the last
1,300 years or so, militant Islam and militant Christianity
have taken turns trying to conquer the world, haven't they?

It would seem so, but as you said; The problem started 1300 years
ago. What gave rise to Islam?
What is the difference?


And they're not the only civilizations to have gone on a
rampage of conquest and exploitation when they felt they
could get away with it.

The kingdom of Burma, of all places, was engaged in regional
wars of expansion and the enslavement of neighboring peoples
up until the early 1800s, when the British carved up Burma
in three wars and imposed their own - er - "benevolent" rule
on a fractious people.

The sun never sets on the folly of man.


In West Africa during the centuries of the Atlantic Slave Trade,
there were local kingdoms and city states whose leaders cheerfully
conquered and enslaved their neighbors in order to sell them
to the Europeans and Americans. It wasn't either Islam or Christianity
that inspired a lot of these guys - just normal human bloody-mindedness
and a willingness to kick butt for fun and profit.

So? If you put a bunch of people on an island you have an island
full of people. Leave them alone and they will not stay home for
all thins are better around them.


So we're all potentially culpable, aren't we? I'm not saying
this justifies what the US has done at Abu Ghraib, or what
al Qaeda claims credit for having done at the World Trade
Towers, or what the Israelis and Palestinians are busy doing
to each other.

Down right weird ain't it. Do you think things will change?
I do. I think things will change but only as spots on a tiger.


But isn't there a lot of evidence that when given the chance
and the motivation, people of all colors, races and creeds
can be sadistic buttheads?

Or buttheaded sadists. Apparently you can see the center of
depravity and why it balances the way it does. Good, glad I
am not the only one, and some day I hope I hope they'll join
us, and the world can live as one.


*****
"Erik A. Mattila" <emattila@oco.net> wrote in message news:<40A0385A.70001@oco.net>...

00:00:00Hg wrote:

On Mon, 10 May 2004 23:50:40 +0000, Juan M. Gandia Sanmartin wrote:


On Sat, 08 May 2004 07:02:40 -0500, "00:00:00Hg" <snack@tack.crucnh>
wrote:

Dear NG Companions
As first I must apologize for my poor knowledge of the English
language. It would be a pity if you don't understand/misunderstand
what I will write next.



I understand and conclude we see eye to eye.

The time has come for the people of the world to rise up in one voice
as seperate and unique Nations and cultures and take from each the best
of thought and combine the matrix into a unified Mandate for all
governments of the world. Not a "United Nations". I said "Unique".

If the established cultures of the world are unified as the United
Nations would direct, we will be faced with with curtural entropy.

Each country and it's cultures must remain intact as autonomous
entities.

I believe the United States should follow it's own Constitution and
keep out of the affairs of other nations. I also believe China should
restore the Dali Lama to Tibet and pay repairations to it's peoples.
I am sure that both the US and China will do that as they have now seen
my disapproval.

I also believe the world has a problem and it's name is Islam.

Islam has declared it's superiority and is extending it's reach.
As if by hypnosis nations are falling into it's grasp. Even in
America Islam is revered above all religions by the Satanic Left
and the Democratic Party.


Wait a minute...I thought it was White Christian Nations that tried to
conquer the world and impose its values everywhere more or less by the
sword. Have I been reading the wrong history books?

eam


.


User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 11 May 2004 10:53:35 AM
On Mon, 10 May 2004 19:20:10 -0700, Erik A. Mattila wrote:

Have I been reading the wrong history books?

As long as you read any, you have read possible rewritten.
The key is your life. If it has been long you have an unwritten
history of experience with which to judge current things.
When you rely on the perspectives of others be careful what you
collect to add to your collection of opinions.
The one thing science cannot grasp is the nature of man.

.



User: "ad"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 11 May 2004 03:23:17 AM
test
"Juan M. Gandia Sanmartin" <BoodahXXX@XXXgmx.net> wrote in message
news:of00a056v7lk2rf8u7h2eihhs86fli5nr9@4ax.com...

On Sat, 08 May 2004 07:02:40 -0500, "00:00:00Hg" <snack@tack.crucnh>
wrote:

Dear NG Companions
As first I must apologize for my poor knowledge of the English
language. It would be a pity if you don't understand/misunderstand
what I will write next.
It was a very interesting discussion about Americans and Sadism.
I'm sure that in the whole America's population there is only a few
number of persons that would consciously do injures or willingly
humiliate another persons and these few persons are insane. I'm sure
that if these guards at the Iraq prison would have seen during his
civil life a film in which would appear soldiers doing that what they
have done, they would be shocked and would have said that such thigs
are criminal.
The question is: Why they have done that if normally they would not
do?
Usually we say that people don't do many criminal things because:
a) You have got a education at home showing you what is wrong and what
is right.
b) There is a society which has developed rules of living together and
also the power to punish the wrongdoer.
But now again the question: Why the Hell they have done that?
IMHO I think is a mix of fail of above expressed rules.

I'm a Spaniard and I'm observing here in Spain too that in the last
time parents are more and more not accepting his primary
responsability of giving a social education to his children.
They are giving excuses such as " this is a matter of the school"
or "this child is an evil. I try but it's impossible to educate him"
The truth is that to social educate a children is a very difficult job
today and if you want to have any succes, you must begin very early
and wear a lot of patience. If you want begin when the child has four
years, sorry but it's too late. The children has learned other things
and now is listening the voices of the exterior and no more papa and
mama.
Well, we have now one of the problems: childrens that don't have had a
social education at home are potential wrongdoers but most of them
don't do anything wrong in his full life. Why??
Because the exterior voices that he/she was listening in its youth
and, probably, his own life experience show them that there is a big
trouble if you violate the rules of the established society. And so
many potential wrongdoers are only bad drivers or, occasionally,
bothering or offending other people.
But in the case of the guards of the Iraq prison, they are gone too
far. And the question is: Why??
I think that it was because the two barriers which prevents us from
doing such a miserable act (social education and law) were not present
at all in this prison.
I can understand the fault of social education in a person ( it's a
pity but ***** happens) but if I were an American citizen I would never
accept that the person which was responsible for the application of
the law in the territory under his charge would accept such sadistic
acts without punish it. It is again the image of America. You gave him
a duty and he was running away from the enemy.
If you were a employer and you have a worker that when you are not
present, stop to work and goes to the bar. Would you accept it?
Certainly not. Allright then, please, think the following: You are in
a ship, a big one with more than 200 millions passengers. The ship is
called US America and you have a captain, a pilot and so far, a crew.
But all these persons, no matter how important they are, THEY ARE YOUR
WORKERS. They are here to bring the ship in a safe, nice harbour and
not to make this ship his personal Love Boat.

It is my humble opinion
Juan

On Sun, 09 May 2004 06:40:10 -0400, PagCal wrote:

Not all Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers


No, you've got it wrong. All Americans can easily become sadistic
killers. Read the referenced experiments at Stanford University to see
that this is so.

Read on ...

---

Bush is trying to defuse the latest Iraqi torture pics as the work of
a few rogue Americans, but this is simply not the case.


A structure born of imorality brought on by Liberal control of the
education system which has changed the product of this generation
and has painted itself into the picture of man for all to see, and
you want to make implications that the results of Liberialism is the
fault of the Right and Bush? Typical.



If you read through the attached link and summary, it's clear that
this propensity of evil exists within all of us.


Keep that in mind.


The only way we are able to operate in a humane way, is through
social structures that reinforce this behavior.


The social structure the Left has brought forth in America has
become exactally NOT what you describe. All the rules are by the

wayside

and the brave new world of young Americans are expressing exactally

what

they were taught to do, nothing more, nothing less. Congradulations my
Dear Socialist Marxist, you have won your battle for the minds of the
American youth and they are paving the streets of the world with the
stones you provided them.



Bush must take the blame, as the commander in chief, for not setting
up and monitoring these structures.


If the character flaws are in and part of all mankind as you point out,
how then is it that you can focus on one individual as the "Blame" for
a flaw that is inherient in all mankind?

I must correct you by way of your own words so that truth takes
precidence above bias.

Bush can be responsible for only 1/(Total Humans Alive). In other words
he can only be responsible for his own actions. If his action is to
make all mankind face the problem and know that 'the acts' are inherent
and latent in all of us, then he will be a great leader. If on the

other

hand he chooses the path you have laid out for him, what do you suppose
the outcome will be if Bush elects to become a 'Jesus Christ' and take
on the blame for a flaw that plagues the whole world of man?

Still think Bush should take the blame? Or, would you rather he take
the action of leading the world into a better understanding of itself?
If there is forgiveness in him, can he use it to ignite the fire of
understanding? Is it possible to stop the designs of Islam to conquer
the world and find a solution to appease it into stopping it's motion?

If you were in Bush's shoes at the moment, and know what he knows, what
course of action would you take? I am curious as to how your projection
of thought into the apex of the pyramid of world power would effect me,
my life, and my neighbors around me, and especally all my Hacker

friends.


I do not expect links from you, I expect you to in your own words tell
me how you would handle the problems of the world. Impress me.




http://www.prisonexp.org/

A Simulation Study of the
Psychology of Imprisonment
Conducted at Stanford University

Welcome to the Stanford Prison Experiment web site, which features an
extensive slide show and information about this classic psychology
experiment. What happens when you put good people in an evil place?

Does

humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? These are some of the
questions we posed in this dramatic simulation of prison life conducted
in the summer of 1971 at Stanford University.

How we went about testing these questions and what we found may astound
you. Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison
life had to be ended prematurely after only six days because of what

the

situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a
few days, our guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed
and showed signs of extreme stress. Please join me on a slide tour of
describing this experiment and uncovering what it tells us about the
nature of Human Nature.



.


User: "PagCal"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 09 May 2004 03:48:16 PM
You, Mr. Polyanna Republican thought you could unleash the dogs of war,
and then, Oh, just apologize when they killed and tortured the Iraqi.
Well, it's never worked in the past, it won't work now, nor will it ever
work in the future. Any lame comparisions you Polyanna Republicans make
to Japan or Germany show that you've only read history out of comic books.
And what did Bush try for? A liberal democracy where none have ever
existed before. It's not only stupid, but moronic. The foundations, such
as a middle class, simply don't exist in Iraq. As well, threw most of
the country out of work by also trying social engineering such as
privitization, which certainly won't get people back to work any time soon.
And torture at Sadam's old prison of a few hundred people is not the
worst of it. We've killed between 8k and 10k civilians, and wounded
typically 10x that number or around 100k Iraqi. And, we keep at it, as
if more firepower in Falujah or Najaf will somehow FINALLY win the
hearts and minds. Those pics don't make it into Western Press daily, but
they do make it into Arab press daily - and they show us a butchers,
defilers, and killers of women and children.
And then, of course we use DU ammunition, which spikes birth defects by
3x to 10x in the country. After the '91 war, the first question became,
'Does the kid have all it's arms and legs?' - and sadly, with our new
and improved computerized warfare, we'll guarantee this question well
into the future.
Can it get worse?
Well, Mr. Polyanna Republican, did you know that Rummy said we haven't
seen the worst of it. He's got snuff videos, and rape videos - some with
sound, and hundreds of other pictures - all waiting to dribble out into
the news.
Did we eleminate Al-Quaeda?
No, we've created a failed state where they can flourish.
.
User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 08 May 2004 11:10:34 AM
If you want to address me, then please use proper quoting procedures
and address the issue, topic, and subject by paragraph. Makes things
easier to follow.
The below diatribe of yours is useless pablum spewed like by a flaming
Liberal that cannot maintain his composure much less his thinking
process. You can drop the play acting and come out of the closet.
No one will think ill of you if your true humanity illuminates the
discourse.
Bush has flaws and has taken actions that effect the emotions of
many across all demographics, so if you want to have an intelligent
conversation and possibly learn something you did not know, then
let's set at the table as observers in common. I am not a republican.
I am not a democrat. I am not an anything political except possibly
apolitical. I have never voted nor will I ever. I stand alone as
an independant observer that weighs things by merit. I judge but
I pass no sentence. My word is my sword and it is very sharp and
double edged.
"Pollyanna"? :-D
On Sun, 09 May 2004 16:48:16 -0400, PagCal wrote:

You, Mr. Polyanna Republican thought you could unleash the dogs of war,
and then, Oh, just apologize when they killed and tortured the Iraqi.
Well, it's never worked in the past, it won't work now, nor will it ever
work in the future. Any lame comparisions you Polyanna Republicans make
to Japan or Germany show that you've only read history out of comic books.

And what did Bush try for? A liberal democracy where none have ever
existed before. It's not only stupid, but moronic. The foundations, such
as a middle class, simply don't exist in Iraq. As well, threw most of
the country out of work by also trying social engineering such as
privitization, which certainly won't get people back to work any time soon.

And torture at Sadam's old prison of a few hundred people is not the
worst of it. We've killed between 8k and 10k civilians, and wounded
typically 10x that number or around 100k Iraqi. And, we keep at it, as
if more firepower in Falujah or Najaf will somehow FINALLY win the
hearts and minds. Those pics don't make it into Western Press daily, but
they do make it into Arab press daily - and they show us a butchers,
defilers, and killers of women and children.

And then, of course we use DU ammunition, which spikes birth defects by
3x to 10x in the country. After the '91 war, the first question became,
'Does the kid have all it's arms and legs?' - and sadly, with our new
and improved computerized warfare, we'll guarantee this question well
into the future.

Can it get worse?

Well, Mr. Polyanna Republican, did you know that Rummy said we haven't
seen the worst of it. He's got snuff videos, and rape videos - some with
sound, and hundreds of other pictures - all waiting to dribble out into
the news.

Did we eleminate Al-Quaeda?

No, we've created a failed state where they can flourish.

.
User: "PagCal"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 10 May 2004 05:33:46 AM
You should observe the first rule of debate = stay on subject.
What are you babbling about now? It's as if you have no defense for what
you've and the other Polyanna Republicans have done.
.
User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 10 May 2004 08:11:14 AM
On Mon, 10 May 2004 06:33:46 -0400, PagCal wrote:

You should observe the first rule of debate = stay on subject.

It's impossile with a Liberal apparently.
By staying on subject you mean you will lead and I will follow.
No thanks, If you cannot stay on earth much less the subject how
am I to get you to stop dodging long enough to FOCUS on your folly?


What are you babbling about now? It's as if you have no defense for what
you've and the other Polyanna Republicans have done.

You see, I told you I am apolitical yet you insist on labeling.
Again, no thanks, you have unwittingly proved my point, and now
this conversation is over.
Now go away an learn some proper posting style.
.






User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 08 May 2004 09:25:30 AM
On Sun, 09 May 2004 02:31:53 -0700, AbelMalcolm wrote:

Speaking as a Democrat myself, we care about the poor, the
oppressed, about fairness, human rights, and all that kind of stuff.

That's nice to hear. Seeing it in practice is as rare as watching the
birth of a Phoenix though. In fact the Democrats should drop the jackass
as the emblem of their party and adopt the Phosnix. Birds of Fire.
Republicans should elect changees in symbolism also. The elephant should
give way to the beaver or better yet the groundhog so the party can see
the shadow of it's former self at least one day a year depending on the
weather.


.
User: "kstahl"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 09 May 2004 05:31:06 PM
00:00:00Hg wrote:

On Sun, 09 May 2004 02:31:53 -0700, AbelMalcolm wrote:


Speaking as a Democrat myself, we care about the poor, the
oppressed, about fairness, human rights, and all that kind of stuff.



That's nice to hear. Seeing it in practice is as rare as watching the
birth of a Phoenix though. In fact the Democrats should drop the jackass
as the emblem of their party and adopt the Phosnix. Birds of Fire.

Republicans should elect changees in symbolism also. The elephant should
give way to the beaver or better yet the groundhog so the party can see
the shadow of it's former self at least one day a year depending on the
weather.





Gotta love those beavers. They are so warm and furry.
.
User: "00:00:00Hg"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 08 May 2004 12:39:08 PM
On Sun, 09 May 2004 18:31:06 -0400, kstahl wrote:

00:00:00Hg wrote:

On Sun, 09 May 2004 02:31:53 -0700, AbelMalcolm wrote:


Speaking as a Democrat myself, we care about the poor, the
oppressed, about fairness, human rights, and all that kind of stuff.



That's nice to hear. Seeing it in practice is as rare as watching the
birth of a Phoenix though. In fact the Democrats should drop the jackass
as the emblem of their party and adopt the Phosnix. Birds of Fire.

Republicans should elect changees in symbolism also. The elephant should
give way to the beaver or better yet the groundhog so the party can see
the shadow of it's former self at least one day a year depending on the
weather.





Gotta love those beavers. They are so warm and furry.

Humm.... Beavers, Bush... Yep, fits!
.



User: "jlm2005"

Title: Re: Not All Americans Are Brutal Sadistic Killers 16 Mar 2005 05:59:52 PM
We should not at all be so horrified by all of this abuse. We did,
after all, ask for it by giving the military police free reign over
detainees.
Because the government decided that the prisoners deserved any of the
same unalienable rights to which all humans are entitled, the police
have gone on a rampage and become power-hungry animals.
This will all soon be turned back on us, though. We can expect local
law enforcement agencies to do the same to us in the future; the
precident has been set.
None of these hideous problems would be facing us now if we had not
stripped these people of their rights to begin with. If we had simply
tried or released them, we would not be exposed for the bloodthirsty
mongrels that we are.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles