Not enough protective armor? Rumsfeld tells American troops to suck it up.



 Politics > Politics-USA > Not enough protective armor? Rumsfeld tells American troops to suck it up.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 08 Dec 2004 09:44:45 PM
Object: Not enough protective armor? Rumsfeld tells American troops to suck it up.
From The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 12/8/04:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/202906_rummyed.html
Scrapping for armor
There ought to be a medal to reward the courage demonstrated yesterday
by Army Spc. Thomas Wilson, one of the Tennessee Army National Guard
citizen soldiers who make up most of the 278th Regimental Combat Team
preparing to leave Kuwait for action in Iraq.
To the cheers of his comrades, Wilson asked Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld, "Why do we soldiers have to dig through local
landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to
uparmor our vehicles?"
Rumsfeld, whose cold-iron scowl can wilt uppity members of Congress,
asked Wilson to repeat the question.
"We do not have proper armored vehicles to carry us north," Wilson
insisted.
Rumsfeld's flinty response:
"You go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or
wish to have at a later time."
In other words, quit your bellyaching.
Of course, going to war in Iraq with any sort of army was a choice,
and a misguided one.
There were no threatening weapons of mass destruction.
There was no link to the 9/11 attacks or their perpetrators.
The war's timing and the troop strengths and level of equipment were
all decisions made by Rumsfeld and President Bush.
They were bad choices.
They've meant too few troops to maintain security, let alone civil
order, and they exposed U.S. troops to unnecessary risks through
insufficiently armored vehicles.
And there's more to it than simply underestimating the ferocity of
insurgent resistance to the U.S.-led invasion.
The situation in Iraq casts doubt on Rumsfeld's thesis of a new way to
wage war -- using quick strikes with fast vehicles on tires instead of
tracks.
It proved an effective way to achieve a battlefield victory against a
far weaker adversary but has left our forces unprepared and unequipped
to maintain the peace.
Roughly half of American deaths might have been prevented with
better-armored vehicles.
Rumsfeld should have recognized the notion of U.S. troops scavenging
garbage dumps for makeshift armor as the outrageous scandal that it is
and should have promised his troops the heads of every responsible
officer.
Instead, he told his troops to suck it up.
__________________________________________________________
Harry
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Army chief tells Bush: there's not enough money for Iraq war.
More U$ Troops Headed to Iraq - No One Else Stupid Enough to Go
ESPN hired pigboy Limbaugh - the Goodyear Blimp wasn't enough wind.
Reagan miniseries wasn't "flattering" enough. Hey I've got yer flattering right here.
Elect Bush- we've waited long enough for Armageddon.
Homeland_Insecurity idle threat - Man enough to follow up?
``The Media Want Kerry to Win" - Reason Enough for Them to Lose
Bush's one-fingered victory salute - Is he really mature enough for office?
Thank GOD There Are Enough Decent, Intelligent People In This Country...!
~WHEN IS BUSH'S ROTTEN LEADERSHIP ENOUGH ALREADY?~
!Enough Is Enough!
Not enough students test as 'gifted'? Just change definition and do more tests
BREAKING: Remember just a few weeks ago the Saudis said we'd have enough oil for 50 years?
Compass' Departure as New Orleans Chief 'Right, but not enough,' says SAF
God's Messenger salvationsplan: please consider that we already have enough G*d Messengers with Heinirich, the self proclaimed Messiah!
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER