Not In Our Name: Vietnam, Iraq and the Voters' Pledge



 Politics > Politics-USA > Not In Our Name: Vietnam, Iraq and the Voters' Pledge

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Termagnard"
Date: 14 Jul 2006 02:33:01 AM
Object: Not In Our Name: Vietnam, Iraq and the Voters' Pledge
Not In Our Name: Vietnam, Iraq and the Voters' Pledge
Sign the VotersForPeace Pledge Today www.VotersForPeace.US
By Dan Ellsberg
According to recent opinion polls, most Iraqis don't believe that
we're making things better or safer in their country. What does that
say about the legitimacy of prolonged occupation, much less permanent
American bases in Iraq? What does it mean for continued American
armored patrols such as the one last November in Haditha, which, we now
learn, led to the deaths of a Marine and 24 unarmed civilians?
Questions very much like these nagged at my conscience at the height
of the Vietnam War, and led, eventually, to the publication of the
first of the Pentagon Papers in June of 1971, 35 years ago.
As a former Marine Commander and defense analyst in 1970, I had
exclusive access to highly classified defense documents for research
purposes. They came to be known as the Pentagon Papers and constituted
a 47-volume, top-secret Defense Department history of American
involvement in Vietnam titled, "U.S. Decision-making in Vietnam,
1945-68." The Pentagon Papers made it very clear that I, like the rest
of the American public, had been misled about the origins and purposes
of the war I had participated in -- just as are the 85% of the troops
in Iraq today who still believe that Saddam Hussein was responsible for
9/11 and that he was allied with Al Qaeda.
That period had several similarities to this one. Congress was
debating the withdrawal of U.S. armed forces from Indochina while
President Nixon was making secret plans to expand, rather than exit
from, the ongoing war in Southeast Asia -- including a major air
offensive against North Vietnam, possibly using nuclear weapons. Today,
the Bush administration's threats to wage war against Iran are
explicit, with officials reiterating regularly that the nuclear
"option" is "on the table." Americans saw the color photographs of the
My Lai massacre; now we are seeing photographs eerily similar to those
from Haditha: women, children, old men and babies, all shot at short
range.
What was it that prompted me to begin copying 7,000 pages of highly
classified documents -- an act that I fully expected would send me to
prison for life? I came to the conclusion that the system I had been
part of, giving my unquestioning loyalty to for 15 years, as a Marine,
a Pentagon official and a State Department officer in Vietnam, was a
system that lies reflexively, at every level, from sergeant to
commander in chief, about murder. And I had the evidence to prove it.
The papers showed very clearly how we had become engaged in a reckless
war of choice in someone else's country -- a country that had not
attacked us -- for our own domestic and external purposes. It became
clear to me that the justifications that had been given for our
involvement were false. And if the war itself was unjust, then all the
victims of our firepower were being killed without justification.
That's murder.
Today, there must be, at the very least, hundreds of civilian and
military officials in the Pentagon, CIA, State Department, National
Security Agency and White House who have in their safes and computers
comparable documentation of intense internal debates -- so far
carefully concealed from Congress and the public -- about prospective
or actual war crimes, reckless policies and domestic crimes: the
Pentagon Papers of Iraq, Iran or the ongoing war on U.S. liberties.
Some of those officials, I hope, will choose to accept the personal
risks of revealing the truth -- earlier than I did -- before more lives
are lost or a new war is launched.
Haditha holds a mirror up not just to American troops in the field,
but to our whole society. Not just to the liars in government but to
those who believe them too easily. And to all of us in the public, in
the administration, in Congress and the media who dissent so far
ineffectively or who stand by as murder is being done and do nothing to
stop it or expose it.
Americans must summon the civil courage to face what is being done
in their name and to refuse to be accomplices. The Voters' Pledge is
one way to do this. The Voters' Pledge is a project comprising many of
the major organizations in the antiwar movement-United for Peace and
Justice, Peace Action, Gold Star Families for Peace, Code Pink, and
Democracy Rising-as well as groups with broader agendas like the
National Organization for Women, Progressive Democrats of America,
AfterDowningStreet.com, and magazines including the American
Conservative and The Nation. The goal of this coalition is to build a
base of antiwar voters that cannot be ignored by anyone running for
office in the United States. We want millions of voters to sign the
pledge and say no to pro-war candidates.
You can help right now by visiting www.VotersForPeace.US and
immediately signing the Voters' Pledge.
VotersForPeace
6930 Carroll Ave., Suite 240
Takoma Park, MD 20912
(301) 270-2355
Copyright 2006 VotersForPeace.US & Dan Ellsberg
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER